Search

Gβγ subunits mediate many different signaling processes in various compartments of the cell, including the nucleus. To gain insight into the functions of nuclear Gβγ signaling, we investigated the functional role of Gβγ signaling in the regulation of GPCR-mediated gene expression in primary rat neonatal cardiac fibroblasts. We identified a novel, negative, regulatory role for the Gβ(1)γ dimer in the fibrotic response. Depletion of Gβ(1) led to derepression of the fibrotic response at the mRNA and protein levels under basal conditions and an enhanced fibrotic response after sustained stimulation of the angiotensin II type I receptor. Our genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Gβ(1) colocalized and interacted with RNA polymerase II on fibrotic genes in an angiotensin II-dependent manner. Additionally, blocking transcription with inhibitors of Cdk9 prevented association of Gβγ with transcription complexes. Together, our findings suggest that Gβ(1)γ is a novel transcriptional regulator of the fibrotic response that may act to restrict fibrosis to conditions of sustained fibrotic signaling. Our work expands the role for Gβγ signaling in cardiac fibrosis and may have broad implications for the role of nuclear Gβγ signaling in other cell types.

Although technical prowess in screening for drugs has increased dramatically with the development of high content imaging, resonance energy transfer- and intensiometric biosensors, translation into the clinic has stagnated and not all drugs work in all patients. This is likely due to 1) our rudimentary understanding of disease mechanisms, and 2) our increasing use of generic, cell-based screens which have moved us away from biologically relevant tissues, organs, and patients. Here, we focus on emerging tools to undertake screening and evaluate drug actions in models ranging from heterologous expression systems, primary cells, patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells and organoids to in vivo models.

Genetically encoded biosensors can be used to track signaling events in living cells by measuring changes in fluorescence emitted by one or more fluorescent proteins. Here, we describe the use of genetically encoded biosensors based on Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET), combined with high-content microscopy, to image dynamic signaling events simultaneously in thousands of neurons in response to drug treatments. We first applied this approach to examine intercellular variation in signaling responses among cultured striatal neurons stimulated with multiple drugs. Using high-content FRET imaging and immunofluorescence, we identified neuronal subpopulations with unique responses to pharmacological manipulation and used nuclear morphology to identify medium spiny neurons within these heterogeneous striatal cultures. Focusing on protein kinase A (PKA) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling in the cytoplasm and nucleus, we noted pronounced intercellular differences among putative medium spiny neurons, in both the magnitude and kinetics of signaling responses to drug application. Importantly, a conventional “bulk” analysis that pooled all cells in culture yielded a different rank order of drug potency than that revealed by single-cell analysis. Using a single-cell analytical approach, we dissected the relative contributions of PKA and ERK1/2 signaling in striatal neurons and unexpectedly identified a novel role for ERK1/2 in promoting nuclear activation of PKA in striatal neurons. This finding adds a new dimension of signaling crosstalk between PKA and ERK1/2 with relevance to dopamine D1 receptor signaling in striatal neurons. In conclusion, high-content single-cell imaging can complement and extend traditional population-level analyses and provides a novel vantage point from which to study cellular signaling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT High-content imaging revealed substantial intercellular variation in the magnitude and pattern of intracellular signaling events driven by receptor stimulation. Since individual neurons within the same population can respond differently to a given agonist, interpreting measures of intracellular signaling derived from the averaged response of entire neuronal populations may not always reflect what happened at the single-cell level. This study uses this approach to identify a new form of cross-talk between PKA and ERK1/2 signaling in the nucleus of striatal neurons.

The inaccessibility of human cardiomyocytes significantly hindered years of cardiovascular research efforts. Post-mortem tissue or biopsies from diseased patients, which remain scarcely available, rendered it possible to study end-stage heart disease yet the inclusion of healthy human cardiac materials for basic science research was beyond reach. To overcome these limitations, non-human cell sources were used as proxies to study heart function and associated diseases. Rodent models became increasingly acceptable surrogates to model the human heart either in vivo or through in vitro cultures. More recently, due to concerns regarding animal to human translation, including cross-species differences, the use of human inducible stem cell derived cardiomyocytes presented a renewed opportunity. We think it necessary to conduct a comparative study, assessing cellular signalling through cardiac G protein-coupled receptors and bulk transcriptomics of traditional rat neonatal cardiomyocytes and human iPSC-CMs. Genetically-encoded biosensors were used to interrogate nuclear protein kinase A (PKA) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/ 2 (ERK1/2) in rat and human-derived cardiomyocyte populations. To increase data granularity, a single-cell analytical approach was conducted for an in-depth examination of existing differences between both in vitro cardiomyocyte models. Using automated high content microscopy, our analyses of nuclear PKA and ERK1/2 signaling revealed distinct response clusters in rat and human CMs. In line with this, bulk RNA-seq demonstrated key differences regarding the expression patterns of GPCRs, G proteins and effectors. Overall, our study demonstrates that human stem cell derived models of the cardiomyocyte do provide significant advantages and should be taken advantage of.

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a cardiovascular condition that develops when the left ventricle of the heart enlarges, compromising its function and diminishing its capacity to pump oxygenated blood throughout the body. After patients are diagnosed with DCM, disease progression can lead to heart failure and the need for a heart transplantation. DCM is a complex disease where underlying causes can be idiopathic, genetic, or environmental. An incomplete molecular understanding of disease progression poses challenges for drug discovery efforts as effective therapeutics strategies remain elusive. Decades of research using primary cells or animal models have increased our understanding of DCM but has been hampered due to the inaccessibility of human cardiomyocytes, to model cardiac disease, in vitro, in a dish. Here, our goal is to leverage patient-derived hiPSC-CMs and to combine them with biosensors to understand how cellular signalling is altered in DCM. With high sensitivity and versatility, optical biosensors represent the ideal tools to dissect the molecular determinants of cardiovascular disease, in an unbiased manner and in real-time at the level of single cells. By characterizing the pathobiology of dilated cardiomyopathy in a patient-specific manner using high content biosensor-based assays, we aim to uncover personalized mechanisms for the occurrence and development of DCM and as a pathway to development of personalized therapeutics.

The role of different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the cardiovascular system is well understood in cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). In the former, stimulation of Gs-coupled receptors leads to increases in contractility, whereas stimulation of Gq-coupled receptors modulates cellular survival and hypertrophic responses. In VSMCs, stimulation of GPCRs also modulates contractile and cell growth phenotypes. Here, we will focus on the relatively less well-studied effects of GPCRs in cardiac fibroblasts, focusing on key signaling events involved in the activation and differentiation of these cells. We also review the hierarchy of signaling events driving the fibrotic response and the communications between fibroblasts and other cells in the heart. We discuss how such events may be distinct depending on where the GPCRs and their associated signaling machinery are localized in these cells with an emphasis on nuclear membrane-localized receptors. Finally, we explore what such connections between the cell surface and nuclear GPCR signaling might mean for cardiac fibrosis.

A comprehensive understanding of signalling downstream of GPCRs requires a broad approach to capture novel signalling modalities in addition to established pathways. Here, using an array of sixteen validated BRET-based biosensors, we analyzed the ability of seven different β-adrenergic ligands to engage five distinct signalling pathways downstream of the β1-adrenergic receptor (β1AR). In addition to generating signalling signatures and capturing functional selectivity for the different ligands toward these pathways, we also revealed coupling to signalling pathways that have not previously been ascribed to the βAR. These include coupling to Gz and G12 pathways. The signalling cascade linking the β1AR to calcium mobilization was also characterized using a combination of BRET-based biosensors and CRISPR-engineered HEK 293 cells lacking the Gαs subunit or with pharmacological or genetically engineered pathway inhibitors. We show that both Gs and G12 are required for the full calcium response. Our work highlights the power of combining signal profiling with genome editing approaches to capture the full complement of GPCR signalling activities in a given cell type and to probe their underlying mechanisms.

In the heart, left ventricular hypertrophy is initially an adaptive mechanism that increases wall thickness to preserve normal cardiac output and function in the face of coronary artery disease or hypertension. Cardiac hypertrophy develops in response to pressure and volume overload but can also be seen in inherited cardiomyopathies. As the wall thickens, it becomes stiffer impairing the distribution of oxygenated blood to the rest of the body. With complex cellular signalling and transcriptional networks involved in the establishment of the hypertrophic state, several model systems have been developed to better understand the molecular drivers of disease. Immortalized cardiomyocyte cell lines, primary rodent and larger animal models have all helped understand the pathological mechanisms underlying cardiac hypertrophy. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes are also used and have the additional benefit of providing access to human samples with direct disease relevance as when generated from patients suffering from hypertrophic cardiomyopathies. Here, we briefly review in vitro and in vivo model systems that have been used to model hypertrophy and provide detailed methods to isolate primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes as well as to generate cardiomyocytes from human iPSCs. We also describe how to model hypertrophy in a "dish" using gene expression analysis and immunofluorescence combined with automated high-content imaging.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is the primary neuropeptide controlling reproduction in vertebrates. GnRH stimulates follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) synthesis via a G protein-coupled receptor, GnRHR, in the pituitary gland. In mammals, GnRHR lacks a C-terminal cytosolic tail (Ctail) and does not exhibit homologous desensitization. This might be an evolutionary adaptation that enables LH surge generation and ovulation. To test this idea, we fused the chicken GnRHR Ctail to the endogenous murine GnRHR in a transgenic model. The LH surge was blunted, but not blocked in these mice. In contrast, they showed reductions in FSH production, ovarian follicle development, and fertility. Addition of the Ctail altered the nature of agonist-induced calcium signaling required for normal FSH production. The loss of the GnRHR Ctail during mammalian evolution is unlikely to have conferred a selective advantage by enabling the LH surge. The adaptive significance of this specialization remains to be determined.

Over the last decade, the urotensinergic system, composed of one G protein-coupled receptor and two endogenous ligands, has garnered significant attention as a promising new target for the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases. Indeed, this system is associated with various biomarkers of cardiovascular dysfunctions and is involved in changes in cardiac contractility, fibrosis, and hypertrophy contributing, like the angiotensinergic system, to the pathogenesis and progression of heart failure. Significant investment has been made toward the development of clinically relevant UT ligands for therapeutic intervention, but with little or no success to date. This system therefore remains to be therapeutically exploited. Pepducins and other lipidated peptides have been used as both mechanistic probes and potential therapeutics; therefore, pepducins derived from the human urotensin II receptor might represent unique tools to generate signaling bias and study hUT signaling networks. Two hUT-derived pepducins, derived from the second and the third intracellular loop of the receptor (hUT-Pep2 and [Trp1, Leu2]hUT-Pep3, respectively), were synthesized and pharmacologically characterized. Our results demonstrated that hUT-Pep2 and [Trp1, Leu2]hUT-Pep3 acted as biased ago-allosteric modulators, triggered ERK1/2 phosphorylation and, to a lesser extent, IP1 production, and stimulated cell proliferation yet were devoid of contractile activity. Interestingly, both hUT-derived pepducins were able to modulate human urotensin II (hUII)- and urotensin II-related peptide (URP)-mediated contraction albeit to different extents. These new derivatives represent unique tools to reveal the intricacies of hUT signaling and also a novel avenue for the design of allosteric ligands selectively targeting hUT signaling potentially.

The activity of striatal medium-spiny projection neurons is regulated by dopamine acting principally at D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. The dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) is a Gαs/olf-coupled GPCR which activates a cAMP/PKA/DARPP-32 signalling cascade that increases excitability and facilitates plasticity, partly through the regulation of transcription. Transcriptional regulation downstream of the D1R involves the activation of PKA, which can translocate to the nucleus to phosphorylate various targets. The chromatin reader Brd4 regulates transcription induced by neurotrophic factors in cortical neurons and has also been implicated in dopamine-dependent striatal functions. Brd4 is activated by phosphorylation; this facilitates its binding to acetylated histones at promoters and enhancers. In non-neuronal cells, Brd4 is recruited to chromatin in response to PKA signalling. However, it is unknown whether Brd4 is involved in transcriptional activation by the D1R in striatal neurons. Here, we demonstrate that cAMP/PKA signalling increases Brd4 recruitment to dopamine-induced genes in striatal neurons, and that knockdown or inhibition of Brd4 modulated D1R-induced gene expression. Specifically, inhibition of Brd4 with the bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 suppressed the expression of ∼25% of D1R-upregulated genes, while increasing the expression of a subset of immediate-early genes, including Fos and Jun. This pro-transcriptional effect of JQ1 was P-TEFb-dependent, and mediated through inhibition of the BD1 bromodomain of Brd4. Finally, we report that JQ1 treatment downregulated expression of many GPCRs and also impaired ERK1/2 signalling in striatal neurons. Our findings identify Brd4 as a novel regulator of D1R-dependent transcription and delineate complex bi-directional effects of bromodomain inhibitors on neuronal transcription.

How G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) interact with one another remains an area of active investigation. Obligate dimers of class C GPCRs such as metabotropic GABA and glutamate receptors are well accepted, although whether this is a general feature of other GPCRs is still strongly debated. In this review, we focus on the idea that GPCR dimers and oligomers are better imagined as parts of larger metastable signalling complexes. We discuss the nature of functional oligomeric entities, their stabilities and kinetic features and how structural and functional asymmetries of such metastable entities might have implications for drug discovery. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Receptor heteromers and their allosteric receptor-receptor interactions'.

Genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors allow intracellular signaling dynamics to be tracked in live cells and tissues using optical detection. Many such biosensors are based on the principle of Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET), and we have recently developed a simple approach for in vivo detection of FRET-based biosensor signals using fiber photometry. By combining fiber photometry with FRET-based biosensors, we were able to track GPCR-dependent signaling pathways over time, and in response to drug treatments in freely-moving adult rats. Recording from specific neuronal populations, we can quantify intracellular signaling while simultaneously measuring behavioral responses. Our approach, described in detail here, uses adeno-associated viruses infused intracerebrally in order to express genetically-encoded FRET-based biosensors. After several weeks to allow biosensor expression, fiber photometry is used in order to record drug responses in real time from freely-moving adult rats. This methodology would be compatible with other mammalian species and with many biosensors. Hence, it has wide applicability across a spectrum of neuroscience research, ranging from the study of neural circuits and behavior, to preclinical drug development and screening.

Genetically-encoded biosensors are used to track biochemical activities in living cells by measuring changes in fluorescence emitted by one or more fluorescent proteins. In the present article, we describe the application of genetically-encoded FRET biosensors with high content microscopy to image the signaling responses of thousands of neurons in response to drug treatments. We applied this approach to reveal intercellular variation in signaling responses among cultured striatal neurons stimulated with multiple drugs. The striatum is largely composed of medium-spiny GABAergic neurons which are divided into two broad sub-types based in part on their expression of dopamine D1 vs. D2 receptors. Using high content FRET imaging and immunofluorescence, we identified neuronal sub-populations with unique responses to pharmacological manipulation. Focusing on dopamine- and glutamate-regulated PKA and ERK1/2 signaling in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, we identified pronounced intercellular differences, in both the magnitude and kinetics of signaling responses to drug application. Importantly, we found that a conventional “bulk” analysis that included all cells in culture yielded a different rank order of drug potency than that revealed by our single-cell analysis. The high degree of heterogeneity that we observed at the single cell level would not have been detectable using common population-level analyses, derived for example from western blotting or plate reader-based measurements. In conclusion, our single-cell analytical approach highlights the limitations of population-level analyses, and provides a novel way to study signaling biology.

International audience; G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest group of receptors involved in cellular signaling across the plasma membrane and a major class of drug targets. The canonical model for GPCR signaling involves three components — the GPCR, a heterotrimeric G protein and a proximal plasma membrane effector — that have been generally thought to be freely mobile molecules able to interact by ‘collision coupling’. Here, we synthesize evidence that supports the existence of GPCR–effector macromolecular membrane assemblies (GEMMAs) comprised of specific GPCRs, G proteins, plasma membrane effector molecules and other associated transmembrane proteins that are pre-assembled prior to receptor activation by agonists, which then leads to subsequent rearrangement of the GEMMA components. The GEMMA concept offers an alternative and complementary model to the canonical collision-coupling model, allowing more efficient interactions between specific signaling components, as well as the integration of the concept of GPCR oligomerization as well as GPCR interactions with orphan receptors, truncated GPCRs and other membrane-localized GPCR-associated proteins. Collision-coupling and pre-assembled mechanisms are not exclusive and likely both operate in the cell, providing a spectrum of signaling modalities which explains the differential properties of a multitude of GPCRs in their different cellular environments. Here, we explore the unique pharmacological characteristics of individual GEMMAs, which could provide new opportunities to therapeutically modulate GPCR signaling.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) result in chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Genetic studies have shown that the GPR65 gene, as well as its missense coding variant, GPR65*Ile231Leu, is associated with IBD. We aimed to define the signalling and biological pathways downstream of GPR65 activation and evaluate the impact of GPR65*231Leu on these. METHODS: We used HEK 293 cells stably expressing GPR65 and deficient for either Gα(s), Gα(q/11) or Gα(12/13), to define GPR65 signalling pathways, IBD patient biopsies and a panel of human tissues, primary immune cells and cell lines to determine biologic context, and genetic modulation of human THP-1-derived macrophages to examine the impact of GPR65 in bacterial phagocytosis and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. RESULTS: We confirmed that GPR65 signals via the Gα(s) pathway, leading to cAMP accumulation. GPR65 can also signal via the Gα(12/13) pathway leading to formation of stress fibers, actin remodelling and RhoA activation; all impaired by the IBD-associated GPR65*231Leu allele. Gene expression profiling revealed greater expression of GPR65 in biopsies from inflamed compared to non-inflamed tissues from IBD patients or control individuals, potentially explained by infiltration of inflammatory immune cells. Decreased GPR65 expression in THP-1-derived macrophages leads to impaired bacterial phagocytosis, increased NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion in response to an inflammatory stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that GPR65 exerts its effects through Gα(s)- and Gα(12/13)-mediated pathways, that the IBD-associated GPR65*231Leu allele has compromised interactions with Gα(12/13) and that KD of GPR65 leads to impaired bacterial phagocytosis and increased inflammatory signaling via the NLRP3 inflammasome. This work identifies a target for development of small molecule therapies.

The activity of striatal medium-spiny projection neurons is regulated by D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. The D1 receptor (D1R) is a Gα

Over the last decade, the urotensinergic system has garnered significant attention as a promising new target for the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases and also cancer. Significant investment toward the development of clinically relevant UT ligands for therapeutic intervention has been made but have met little to no success to date. The UT system, which has yet to be effectively targeted, therefore remains to be therapeutically exploited. The discovery of allosteric sites that allow modulation of receptor activity will increase the searchable chemical space against a disease-relevant target. Pepducins and other lipidated peptides have been used as both mechanistic probes and potential therapeutics. Therefore, pepducins derived from the human urotensin II receptor might represent unique tools to generate signaling bias and study UT signaling networks. Two hUT-derived pepducins, derived from the second and the third intracellular loop of UT, respectively, have been synthesized and pharmacologically characterized. Our results demonstrated that hUT-Pep2 and [Trp1, Leu2]hUT-Pep3 acted as biased ago-allosteric modulators, triggered ERK1/2 phosphorylation and to a lesser extent, IP1 production, stimulated cell proliferation yet were devoid of contractile activity. Interestingly, both hUT-derived pepducins were able to modulate hUII- and URP-mediated contraction albeit to different extents. These new derivatives represent unique tools to reveal the intricacies of hUT signaling and also a novel avenue to design allosteric ligands selectively targeting UT signaling that could prove to be useful for the treatment of hUT-associated diseases.

As with many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the signalling pathways regulated by the dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) are dynamic, cell type-specific, and can change in the face of disease or drug exposures. In striatal neurons, the D1R activates cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) signalling. However, in Parkinson’s disease (PD), alterations in this pathway lead to functional upregulation of extracellular regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2), contributing to l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID). In order to detect D1R activation in vivo and to study the progressive dysregulation of D1R signalling in PD and LID, we developed ratiometric fiber-photometry with Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosensors and optically detected PKA and ERK1/2 signalling in freely moving rats. We show that in Parkinsonian animals, D1R signalling through PKA and ERK1/2 is sensitized, but that following chronic treatment with l-DOPA, these pathways become partially desensitized while concurrently D1R activation leads to greater induction of dyskinesia.

Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is driven by neurohormonal activation of specific G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in cardiomyocytes and is accompanied by large-scale changes in cardiomyocyte gene expression. These transcriptional changes require activity of positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb), which is recruited to target genes by the bromodomain protein Brd4 or the super elongation complex (SEC). Here, we describe GPCR-specific regulation of these P-TEFb complexes and a novel mechanism for activating Brd4 in primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. The SEC was required for the hypertrophic response downstream of either the α(1)-adrenergic receptor (α(1)-AR) or the endothelin receptor (ETR). In contrast, Brd4 inhibition selectively impaired the α(1)-AR response. This was corroborated by the finding that the activation of α(1)-AR, but not ETR, increased Brd4 occupancy at promoters and superenhancers of hypertrophic genes. Transcriptome analysis demonstrated that the activation of both receptors initiated similar gene expression programs, but that Brd4 inhibition attenuated hypertrophic genes more robustly following α(1)-AR activation. Finally, we show that protein kinase A (PKA) is required for α(1)-AR stimulation of Brd4 chromatin occupancy. The differential role of the Brd4/P-TEFb complex in response to distinct GPCR pathways has potential clinical implications, as therapies targeting this complex are currently being explored for heart failure.

Inhibitors targeting the general RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription machinery are candidate therapeutics in cancer and other complex diseases. Here, we review the molecular targets and mechanisms of action of these compounds, framing them within the steps of RNAPII transcription. We discuss the effects of transcription inhibitors in vitro and in cellular models (with an emphasis on cancer), as well as their efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies. We also discuss the rationale for inhibiting broadly acting transcriptional regulators or RNAPII itself in complex diseases.

Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is driven by neurohormonal activation of specific G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in cardiomyocytes and is accompanied by large-scale changes in cardiomyocyte gene expression. These transcriptional changes require activity of positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb), which is recruited to target genes by the bromodomain protein Brd4 or the Super Elongation Complex (SEC). Here we describe GPCR-specific regulation of these P-TEFb complexes and a novel mechanism for activating Brd4 in primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. The SEC was required for the hypertrophic response downstream of either the α1-adrenergic receptor (α1-AR) or the endothelin receptor (ETR). In contrast, Brd4 inhibition selectively impaired the α1-AR response. This was corroborated by the finding that activation of α1-AR, but not ETR, increased Brd4 occupancy at promoters and super enhancers of hypertrophic genes. Transcriptome analysis demonstrated that activation of both receptors initiated similar gene expression programs, but that Brd4 inhibition attenuated hypertrophic genes more robustly following α1-AR activation. Finally, we show that protein kinase A (PKA) is required for α1-AR stimulation of Brd4 chromatin occupancy. The differential role of the Brd4/P-TEFb complex in response to distinct GPCR pathways has potential clinical implications as therapies targeting this complex are currently being explored for heart failure.

As the largest family of cell surface receptors, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent an important strategic class of therapeutic targets. Attaining a clearer perspective of how such signaling complexes set molecular events in motion could have significant impact on our understanding and treatment of human diseases. As such, many experimental approaches have set out to better understand signaling networks associated with individual receptors to understand signaling architectures and their relationship to signaling outcomes. However, designing in vitro assays aimed at addressing signaling events downstream of single GPCRs must also take into account their propensity to form homo- and heterooligomeric complexes. In the context of GPCR oligomers, physical interactions with a partner protein can have a number of potential consequences, which we will explore in this review. We will also discuss methods used to identify putative dimer partners as well as the various techniques used to study the functional consequences of such complex formation. Since the full functional significance and physiological relevance of GPCR oligomers remains incompletely understood, owing in part to technical limitations, new tools to elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying allosteric co-regulation occurring between two GPCRs are required. Accordingly, using the example of the FP/AT

Gβγ subunits play critical roles in the modulation of a large number of canonical effectors following the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Many of these events occur at the cell surface. However, a number of recent studies of Gβγ function have revealed that they regulate a large number of processes at distinct subcellular sites, transforming our understanding of GPCR function in general and Gβγ signaling in particular. Gβγ subunits have now been identified as regulators of anterograde and retrograde trafficking of proteins, functional modulators of intracellular organelles such as mitochondria, and regulators of transcriptional events. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of these novel noncanonical roles of Gβγ subunits, with a focus on events occurring in the Golgi apparatus, mitochondria, and the nucleus.

As the largest family of cell surface receptors, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent an important strategic class of therapeutic targets. Attaining a clearer perspective of how such signaling complexes set molecular events in motion could have significant impact on our understanding and treatment of human diseases. As such, many experimental approaches have set out to better understand signaling networks associated with individual receptors to understand signaling architectures and their relationship to signaling outcomes. However, designing in vitro assays aimed at addressing signaling events downstream of single GPCRs must also take into account their propensity to form homo- and heterooligomeric complexes. In the context of GPCR oligomers, physical interactions with a partner protein can have a number of potential consequences, which we will explore in this review. We will also discuss methods used to identify putative dimer partners as well as the various techniques used to study the functional consequences of such complex formation. Since the full functional significance and physiological relevance of GPCR oligomers remains incompletely understood, owing in part to technical limitations, new tools to elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying allosteric co-regulation occurring between two GPCRs are required. Accordingly, using the example of the FP/AT1R heterodimer, we discuss the potential of the FlAsH-BRET approach as a simple tool to reveal how allosteric information is transmitted via conformational rearrangements within putative GPCR complexes and as a means to deorphanize receptors.

International audience; The pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), which exists in two isoforms of 27 and 38 amino acids, can induce neuronal protection in vitro and in vivo following the activation of PAC1, a class B G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). With its potent neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects, this peptide represents a promising avenue for the development of therapeutic strategies to potentially cure or at least slow the progression of neurodegenerative disorders. Beyond the canonical G protein signal effectors, GPCRs are also coupled to a multitude of intracellular signaling pathways that can be independently activated by biased ligands, thereby expanding vastly the potential for discovering new drugs. Interestingly, some studies have demonstrated distinct signaling features for the PACAP isoforms. With this observation in mind, we assessed the impact of chemical and structural modifications introduced into specific regions of the PACAP isoforms on their neuroprotective effects, and determined the role played by these physico-chemical and structural features on their signaling signatures. Each compound was also evaluated for its ability to bind the PACAP receptors, promote cell survival in a cellular model of Parkinson's disease and stimulate the signaling partners associated with PAC1 activation, including Gs and Gq, as well as β-arrestin 1 and 2. Our results demonstrate that PACAP38 and its related analogs exert a more potent neuroprotective action than their 27-amino acid counterparts and that this neuroprotective effect is dependent on both Gq and Gs-dependent signaling. This study will definitely improve our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with PACAP neuroprotection.

There is significant evidence that internal pools of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exist and may be affected by both endogenous signaling molecules and hydrophobic pharmaceutical ligands, once assumed to only affect cell surface versions of these receptors. Here, we discuss evidence that the biology of nuclear GPCRs in particular is complex, rich, and highly interactive with GPCR signaling from the cell surface. Caging existing GPCR ligands may be an excellent means of further stratifying the phenotypic effects of known pharmacophores such as β-adrenergic, angiotensin II, and type B endothelin receptor ligands in the cardiovascular system. We describe some synthetic strategies we have used to design ligands to go from in cellulo to in vivo experiments. We also consider how surface and intracellular GPCR signaling might be integrated and ways to dissect this. If they could be selectively targeted, nuclear GPCRs and their associated nucleoligands would represent a completely novel area for exploration by Pharma.

The signalling functions of many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed in the myocardium are incompletely understood. Among these are the endothelin receptor (ETR) family and α1-adrenergic receptor (α1-AR), which are thought to couple to the G protein Gαq. In this study, we used transcriptome analysis to compare the signalling networks downstream of these receptors in primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. This analysis indicated increased expression of target genes of cAMP responsive element modulator (CREM) after 24 h treatment with the α1-AR agonist phenylephrine, but not the ETR agonist endothelin-1, suggesting a specific role for the α1-AR in promoting cAMP production in cardiomyocytes. To validate the difference observed between these two GPCRs, we used heterologous expression of the receptors and genetically encoded biosensors in HEK 293 cell lines. We validated that both α1A- and α1B-AR subtypes were able to lead to the accumulation of cAMP in response to phenylephrine in both the nucleus and cytoplasm in a Gαs-dependent manner. However, the ETR subtype ETA did not affect cAMP levels in either compartment. All three receptors were coupled to Gαq signalling as expected. Further, we showed that activation of PKA in different compartments was α1-AR subtype specific, with α1B-AR able to activate PKA in the cytoplasm and nucleus and α1A-AR only able to in the nucleus. We provide evidence for a pathway downstream of the α1-AR, and show that distinct pools of a receptor lead to differential activation of downstream effector proteins dependent on their cellular compartment.

International audience; Benzotriazepin-2-ones were designed to mimic the suggested bioactive γ-turn conformation of the Bip-Lys-Tyr tripeptide in Urocontrin ([Bip4]URP), which modulates the urotensin II receptor (UT) and differentiates the effects of the endogenous ligands urotensin II (UII) and urotensin II-related peptide (URP). Twenty-six benzotriazepin-2-ones were synthesized by acylation of anthranilate-derived amino ketones with an aza-glycine equivalent, chemoselective nitrogen functionalization, and ring closure. Several mimics exhibited selective modulatory effects on hUII- and URP-associated vasoconstriction in an ex vivo rat aortic ring bioassay. The C5 p-hydroxyphenethenyl benzotriazepin-2-one 20g decreased hUII potency and efficacy without changing URP induced vasoconstriction. Its saturated phenethyl counterpart 23g decreased URP potency without influencing hUII-mediated contraction. To our knowledge, 20g and 23g represent the first achiral molecules that modulate selectively hUII and URP biological activities. Effectively synthesized, benzotriaepin-2-one turn mimics offer the potential to differentiate the respective roles, signaling pathways, and phenotypic outcomes of hUII and URP in the UT system.

The signal transduction by G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) is mediated by heterotrimeric G proteins composed from one of the 16 Gα subunits and the inseparable Gβγ complex assembled from a repertoire of 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subunits. However, the functional role of compositional diversity in Gβγ complexes has been elusive. Using optical biosensors, we examined the function of all Gβγ combinations in living cells and uncovered two major roles of Gβγ diversity. First, we demonstrate that the identity of Gβγ subunits greatly influences the kinetics and efficacy of GPCR responses at the plasma membrane. Second, we show that different Gβγ combinations are selectively dispatched from the plasma membrane to various cellular organelles on a timescale from milliseconds to minutes. We describe the mechanisms regulating these processes and document their implications for GPCR signaling via various Gα subunits, thereby illustrating a role for the compositional diversity of G protein heterotrimers.

The authors would like to point out that the wrong version of Fig. 7 has appeared in the published article. The figure currently appearing as Fig. 7 was, as part of the review process, incorporated into Fig. 6 and a new Fig. 7 was included. The submitted manuscript for review was correct, but unfortunately in the final uploads and proofing an error must have occurred and went undetected. The authors and journal apologise for this error. The correct Fig. 7 is below: [Figure presented]

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transmit information to the cell interior by transducing external signals to heterotrimeric G protein subunits, Gα and Gβγ subunits, localized on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. Though the initial focus was mainly on Gα-mediated events, Gβγ subunits were later identified as major contributors to GPCR-G protein signalling. A broad functional array of Gβγ signalling has recently been attributed to Gβ and Gγ subtype diversity, comprising 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subtypes, respectively. In addition to displaying selectivity towards each other to form the Gβγ dimer, numerous studies have identified preferences of distinct Gβγ combinations for specific GPCRs, Gα subtypes and effector molecules. Importantly, Gβ and Gγ subtype-dependent regulation of downstream effectors, representing a diverse range of signalling pathways and physiological functions have been found. Here, we review the literature on the repercussions of Gβ and Gγ subtype diversity on direct and indirect regulation of GPCR/G protein signalling events and their physiological outcomes. Our discussion additionally provides perspective in understanding the intricacies underlying molecular regulation of subtype-specific roles of Gβγ signalling and associated diseases.

International audience; While sharing common biological activity, the two endogenous ligands of the G protein-coupled receptor UT: urotensin II (UII) and urotensin II-related peptide (URP) also exhibit distinct effects, which could be explained by distinct interactions with their cognate receptor (UT). Accordingly, introduction of a similar substitution at the intracyclic Tyr residue in UII and URP led to compounds with divergent pharmacologic profiles. Hypothesizing that the Tyr(6) residue of URP is a key-element to understand the specific activation of UT by URP, we undertook a study of the structure-activity relationship in which this particular residue was replaced by non-natural and constrained amino acids. Each compound was evaluated for its ability to bind UT, to induce rat aortic ring contraction and to activate Gq and G12 signalling pathways. We identified [Pep(6)]URP, that binds UT with an affinity similar to that of URP, but behaves as a biased ligand. Used as an antagonist, this peptide is also able to selectively reduce the maximal aortic contraction of URP but not UII. Our results suggest that the orientation of the Tyr residue can stabilize at least two different conformations of UT, leading to biased signalling and a probe-dependent allosteric effect.