Search

The differential formation of excitatory (glutamate-mediated) and inhibitory (GABA-mediated) synapses is a critical step for the proper functioning of the brain. An imbalance in these synapses may lead to various neurological disorders such as autism, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome and epilepsy (1-4). Synapses are formed through communication between the appropriate synaptic partners (5-8). However, the molecular mechanisms that mediate the formation of specific synaptic types are not known. Here we show that two members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family, FGF22 and FGF7, promote the organization of excitatory and inhibitory presynaptic terminals, respectively, as target-derived presynaptic organizers. FGF22 and FGF7 are expressed by CA3 pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus. The differentiation of excitatory or inhibitory nerve terminals on dendrites of CA3 pyramidal neurons is specifically impaired in mutants lacking FGF22 or FGF7. These presynaptic defects are rescued by postsynaptic expression of the appropriate FGF. FGF22-deficient mice are resistant to epileptic seizures, and FGF7-deficient mice are prone to them, as expected from the alterations in excitatory/inhibitory balance. Differential effects of FGF22 and FGF7 involve both their distinct synaptic localizations and their use of different signalling pathways. These results demonstrate that specific FGFs act as target-derived presynaptic organizers and help to organize specific presynaptic terminals in the mammalian brain., Target (postsynaptic cell)-derived 'presynaptic organizers' promote the local differentiation of presynaptic axons into functional nerve terminals at sites of synaptic contact (5-8). This presynaptic differentiation includes the clustering of synaptic [...]

Nitric oxide (NO) relaxes the internal anal sphincter (IAS), but its enzymatic source(s) remains unknown; neuronal (nNOS) and endothelial (eNOS) NO synthase (NOS) isoforms could be involved. Also, interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) may be involved in IAS relaxation. We studied the relative roles of nNOS, eNOS, and c-Kit-expressing ICC for IAS relaxation using genetic murine models. The basal IAS tone and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) were assessed in vivo by a purpose-built solid-state manometric probe and by using wild-type, nNOS-deficient ([nNOS.sup.-/-]), eNOS-deficient ([eNOS.sup.-/-]), and W/[W.sup.v] mice (lacking certain c-Kit-expressing ICC) with or without L-arginine or [N.sup.[omega]]-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) treatment. Moreover, the basal tone and response to electrical field stimulation (EFS) were studied in organ bath using wild-type and mutant IAS. In vivo, the basal tone of [eNOS.sup.-/-] was higher and W/Wv was lower than wild-type and [nNOS.sup.-/-] mice. L-Arginine administered rectally, but not intravenously, decreased the basal tone in wild-type, [nNOS.sup.-/-], and W/[W.sup.v] mice. However, neither L-arginine nor L-NAME affected basal tone in [eNOS.sup.-/-] mice. In vitro, L-arginine decreased basal tone in wild-type and [nNOS.sup.-/-] IAS but not in [eNOS.sup.-/-] or wild-type IAS without mucosa. The in vivo RAIR was intact in wild-type, [eNOS.sup.-/-], and W/[W.sup.v] mice but absent in all [nNOS.sup.-/-] mice. EFS-induced IAS relaxation was also reduced in [nNOS.sup.-/-] IAS. Thus the basal IAS tone is largely controlled by eNOS in the mucosa, whereas the RAIR is controlled by nNOS. c-Kit-expressing ICC may not be essential for the RAIR. basal internal anal sphincter tone; electrical field stimulation; internal anal sphincter; nitric oxide synthases; rectoanal inhibitory reflex

Specific formation of excitatory and inhibitory synapses is crucial for proper functioning of the brain. Fibroblast growth factor 22 (FGF22) and FGF7 are postsynaptic-cell-derived presynaptic organizers necessary for excitatory and inhibitory presynaptic differentiation, respectively, in the hippocampus. For the establishment of specific synaptic networks, these FGFs must localize to appropriate synaptic locations -- FGF22 to excitatory and FGF7 to inhibitory postsynaptic sites. Here, we show that distinct motor and adaptor proteins contribute to intracellular microtubule transport of FGF22 and FGF7. Excitatory synaptic targeting of FGF22 requires the motor proteins KIF3A and KIF17 and the adaptor protein SAP102 (also known as DLG3). By contrast, inhibitory synaptic targeting of FGF7 requires the motor KIF5 and the adaptor gephyrin. Time-lapse imaging shows that FGF22 moves with SAP102, whereas FGF7 moves with gephyrin. These results reveal the basis of selective targeting of the excitatory and inhibitory presynaptic organizers that supports their different synaptogenic functions. Finally, we found that knockdown of SAP102 or PSD95 (also known as DLG4), which impairs the differentiation of excitatory synapses, alters FGF7 localization, suggesting that signals from excitatory synapses might regulate inhibitory synapse formation by controlling the distribution of the inhibitory presynaptic organizer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We examined ACh-induced [Ca2+]i dynamics in pancreatic acinar cells prepared from mAChR subtype-specific knockout (KO) mice. ACh did not induce any [Ca2+]i increase in the cells isolated from M1/M3 double KO mice. In the cells from M3KO mice, ACh (0.3–3μM) caused a monotonic [Ca2+]i increase. However, we found characteristic oscillatory [Ca2+]i increases in cells from M1KO mice in lower concentrations of ACh (0.03–0.3μM). We investigated the receptor specific pattern of [Ca2+]i increase in COS-7 cells transfected with M1 or M3 receptors. ACh induced the oscillatory [Ca2+]i increase in M3 expressing cells, but not in cells expressing M1, which exhibited monotonic [Ca2+]i increases. IP3 production detected in fluorescent indicator co-transfected cells was higher in M1 than in M3 expressing cells. From the examination of four types of M1/M3 chimera receptors we found that the carboxyl-terminal region of M3 was responsible for the generation of Ca2+ oscillations. The present results suggest that the oscillatory Ca2+ increase in response to M3 stimulation is dependent upon a moderate IP3 increase, which is suitable for causing Ca2+-dependent IP3-induced Ca2+ release. The C-terminal domain of M3 may contribute as a regulator of the efficiency of Gq and PLC cooperation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

How are excitatory (glutamatergic) and inhibitory (GABAergic) synapses established? Do distinct molecular mechanisms direct differentiation of glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses? In the brain, glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic connections are formed with specific patterns. To establish such precise synaptic patterns, neurons pass through multiple checkpoints during development, such as cell fate determination, cell migration and localization, axonal guidance and target recognition, and synapse formation. Each stage offers key molecules for neurons/synapses to obtain glutamatergic or GABAergic specificity. Some mechanisms are based on intrinsic systems to induce gene expression, whereas others are based on extrinsic systems mediated by cell-cell or axon-target interactions. Recent studies indicate that specific formation of glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses is controlled by the expression or activation of different sets of molecules during development. In this review, the authors outline stages critical to the determination of glutamatergic or GABAergic specificity and describe molecules that act as determinants of specificities in each stage, with a particular focus on the synapse formation stage. They also discuss possible mechanisms underlying glutamatergic and GABAergic synapse formation via synapse-type specific synaptic organizers. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]