Search

Direct-to-patient mobile teledermoscopy is a feasible and useful adjunct to smartphone imaging for monitoring patient-identified lesions of concern, achieving comparable diagnostic and management accuracy as in-office dermatology.

ABSTRACT Objective Methods Results Conclusions To perform an economic evaluation to determine whether or not teledermatology (TD) units in primary care (PC) centers offer an alternative in terms of cost‐utility and cost per quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) to conventional dermatology consultations (face‐to‐face dermatology [F‐F/D]) at the hospital from the perspective of the Public Health System (PHS) and the patients.This is a randomized, controlled, nonblinded, and multicenter study. During 6 months, data from 450 patients (TD: 225 vs. F‐F/D: 225) were collected. From both perspectives, costs, quality of life, and costs per QALYs were analyzed. The QALY scores were estimated from the EuroQol‐5D‐5L (EQ5D‐5L) questionnaire responses.From the perspective of the PHS, the cost per patient was 53.04% lower in the TD group (p < 0.001). Hospital visits decreased by 72.43% in the TD group (p < 0.001). From the patients’ perspective, TD reduced costs per patient by 77.59% (p < 0.001). The cost per QALY was 63.34% higher in the F‐F/D group (p < 0.001). The TD group's total costs were 56.34% lower (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients in the TD group gained 0.05 QALYs more than those in the F‐F/D group (p = 0.004).This study shows that TD units in PC represent a significant cost‐effective alternative to conventional hospital follow‐up. To enhance TD in PC, it is important to introduce remote consultation platforms incorporating artificial intelligence for prediagnosis. This will enable general practitioners and nurses to make more accurate initial assessments. It is also crucial to provide thorough training to healthcare personnel using these technologies to ensure more efficient and personalized care. Public health nurses will benefit from gaining new skills in managing digital tools, which will help in the early identification of dermatological diseases and reduce unnecessary referrals to specialists. This will optimize resources and improve response times for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although the number of teledermatology studies is increasing, not all variables have been researched in equal depth, so there remains a lack of robust evidence for some teledermatology initiatives. This review describes the landscape of teledermatology research and identifies knowledge gaps and research needs. This evidence map can be used to inform clinicians about the current knowledge about teledermatology and guide researchers for future studies. Methods: Our evidence map was conducted according to the Campbell Collaboration checklist for evidence and gap maps. Eight databases were searched (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, and OpenGray), and only included systematic reviews of teledermatology involving humans published in English; while excluding non-systematic reviews (i.e., abstracts, conference proceedings, editorials, commentaries, or letters). From 909 records, 14 systematic reviews published between 2004 and 2022 were included. Our analysis focused on the systematic reviews' characteristics, dermatological conditions studied, rate of overlap and quality assessment of primary studies reviewed, and main findings reported. Results: Teledermatology was reportedly comparable with clinic dermatology and generally accepted by patients as a mode of care delivery for dermatological conditions. However, there are concerns about privacy, communication, completeness of information transmitted, familiarity with the technology, and technical problems. Healthcare professionals were generally satisfied with teledermatology but found telemedicine consultations longer than face-to-face consultations, and less confident in asynchronous teledermatology than conventional consultations. Teledermatology was reportedly more cost-effective than clinic dermatology; especially considering the distance traveled by patients, referral volume to teledermatology, and clinic dermatology costs. Although patients and providers are satisfied with teledermatology, face-to-face dermatology has higher diagnostic and management accuracy. Teledermatology was also used for training medical professionals. Regarding the validity and reliability of teledermatology outcome measures, no significant discussions were found. Conclusions: COVID-19 spotlighted telemedicine in clinical care, and we must ensure telemedicine continually improves with robust research. Further research is necessary for establishing a standardized outcome set, enhancing accuracy, concordance, cost-effectiveness, and safety, comparing teledermatology with non-dermatologist care, examining its effectiveness in non-Western low and middle-income countries, and incorporating patient involvement for improved study design. Systematic review registration: https://www.researchregistry.com/ (Unique Identifying Number: reviewregistry878). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vitiligo is a common skin disorder where melanocytes, the cells that produce skin pigment, are destroyed by the immune system, leading to white patches on the skin and mucous membranes. This condition affects 0.4% to 2.0% of the global population, with a higher prevalence in females and often beginning in childhood. In India, about 1% of the population is affected, particularly in northern regions, with a higher incidence in females and links to other autoimmune diseases. This review examines recent progress in understanding vitiligo and its treatment. It focuses on the genetic, autoimmune, and environmental factors involved in the disease and highlights new therapies, such as targeted molecular treatments and advanced repigmentation methods. Current research shows that oxidative stress and genetic predispositions contribute to the autoimmune destruction of melanocytes. Novel drug delivery systems, including liposomes, nanoemulsions, and nanostructured lipid carriers, have improved treatment effectiveness. Clinical trials are exploring new treatments like Ruxolitinib cream and melanocyte transplantation, while teledermatology is becoming useful for managing patients. Vitiligo also poses a significant economic burden due to its impact on patients’ quality of life. Continued research is essential to develop better, more accessible treatments and reduce the economic impact of vitiligo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology is expanding rapidly, with ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM) from OpenAI, showing promise in patient education, clinical decision-making, and teledermatology. Despite its potential, the ethical, clinical, and practical implications of its application remain insufficiently explored. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, challenges, and future prospects of ChatGPT in dermatology, focusing on clinical applications, patient interactions, and medical writing. ChatGPT was selected due to its broad adoption, extensive validation, and strong performance in dermatology-related tasks. Methods: A thorough literature review was conducted, focusing on publications related to ChatGPT and dermatology. The search included articles in English from November 2022 to August 2024, as this period captures the most recent developments following the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, ensuring that the review includes the latest advancements and discussions on its role in dermatology. Studies were chosen based on their relevance to clinical applications, patient interactions, and ethical issues. Descriptive metrics, such as average accuracy scores and reliability percentages, were used to summarize study characteristics, and key findings were analyzed. Results: ChatGPT has shown significant potential in passing dermatology specialty exams and providing reliable responses to patient queries, especially for common dermatological conditions. However, it faces limitations in diagnosing complex cases like cutaneous neoplasms, and concerns about the accuracy and completeness of its information persist. Ethical issues, including data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the need for transparent guidelines, were identified as critical challenges. Conclusions: While ChatGPT has the potential to significantly enhance dermatological practice, particularly in patient education and teledermatology, its integration must be cautious, addressing ethical concerns and complementing, rather than replacing, dermatologist expertise. Future research should refine ChatGPT's diagnostic capabilities, mitigate biases, and develop comprehensive clinical guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Homelessness in the United States is a significant public health issue, with dermatologic disease being the most prevalent health concern among the undomiciled and sheltered populations. Despite a growing need for dermatologic care, the supply of dermatologists remains insufficient, contributing to disparities in healthcare access for this vulnerable group. This review aims to detail the spectrum of dermatologic conditions experienced by homeless individuals, identify barriers to adequate care, and explore teledermatology as a potential solution to bridge these gaps. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, analyzing studies and reports on dermatologic issues prevalent among the homeless population and the efficacy of teledermatology in addressing these concerns. Homeless individuals face a wide range of dermatologic problems, from common conditions like acne and eczema to severe issues such as cellulitis, leg ulcers, and skin cancer. Drug abuse, domestic and sexual abuse, and parasitic infestations further complicate the dermatologic health of this population. Teledermatology has emerged as a promising tool to enhance access to dermatologic care, showing significant improvements in clinical outcomes and accessibility, especially in underserved urban settings. However, challenges remain, such as the digital divide affecting the elderly and low-income populations, which could potentially exacerbate disparities. Addressing the dermatologic needs of the homeless population requires a multifaceted approach. Teledermatology offers a viable solution to improve care access and efficiency, but additional efforts are necessary to ensure inclusivity and avoid further marginalization. Volunteer-driven multidisciplinary clinics also play a crucial role in providing care, though they face challenges in continuity and resource availability. Future strategies should focus on integrating teledermatology with other supportive services to create a comprehensive care model for this underserved population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Asynchronous teledermatology (TD) has shown promise in improving access to dermatological care, yet studies reveal varied methodologies and results. This study aimed to design a mobile app using the store-and-forward model, marking a pioneering effort in Iran to facilitate written documentation of patient history and skin lesion imagery for accurate diagnosis. Conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, this study involved the development and implementation of a smartphone app to collect clinical data and photographs from 89 patients at a dermatology clinic. Diagnoses made at the clinic served as the gold standard. Three dermatologists independently reviewed the app-recorded data, providing diagnoses that were compared to in-person assessments using the Kappa coefficient and agreement percentage. Lesions were predominantly located on the whole body (47%), with psoriasis (19.1%), acne vulgaris (11.2%), and eczema (10%) being the most common. The overall inter-observer Kappa value demonstrated excellent agreement at 0.856. The study's findings endorse the use of a mobile app for TD as an effective adjunct in regions with scarce dermatological services, such as Iran. To promote the broader application of TD, ongoing research is essential to further establish its reliability and practicality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Suboptimal access to dermatologic care is dependent on patient location and insurance type. Although there have been attempts to address access issues, barriers to providing excellent dermatologic care to all patients at the right time still exist. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of Dermatology Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) project participation on primary care providers' diagnostic and treatment tendencies and accuracy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study constructed using Dermatology Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes case and recommendation data from November 2015 to June 2021. The University of Missouri-based Dermatology Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes specialty hub team offers regularly scheduled live interactive tele-mentoring sessions for primary care providers who practice in rural and underserved areas. 524 patient cases presented by 25 primary care providers were included in the analysis. Of those, 449 cases were included in diagnostic concordance, and 451 in treatment concordance analysis. Results: Less than 40% of all diagnoses were fully concordant with an expert panel. Over 33% of patients were misdiagnosed, and over 26% received partially correct diagnosis. Only 16% of all treatment recommendations were fully concordant with an expert panel. Discussion: Diagnostic and treatment accuracy of participants is low, and Dermatology Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes platform ensured patients received correct diagnosis and treatment quickly. Although tele-dermatology models are effective, they continue to be underutilized. Dermatologists in practice and training should be encouraged to adopt innovative clinical educational models, like Dermatology ECHO, to expand access to dermatologic expertise for the most marginalized populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Blurry images in teledermatology and consultation increased the diagnostic difficulty for both deep learning models and physicians. We aim to determine the extent of restoration in diagnostic accuracy after blurry images are deblurred by deep learning models. Methods: We used 19,191 skin images from a public skin image dataset that includes 23 skin disease categories, 54 skin images from a public dataset of blurry skin images, and 53 blurry dermatology consultation photos in a medical center to compare the diagnosis accuracy of trained diagnostic deep learning models and subjective sharpness between blurry and deblurred images. We evaluated five different deblurring models, including models for motion blur, Gaussian blur, Bokeh blur, mixed slight blur, and mixed strong blur. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic accuracy was measured as sensitivity and precision of correct model prediction of the skin disease category. Sharpness rating was performed by board-certified dermatologists on a 4-point scale, with 4 being the highest image clarity. Results: The sensitivity of diagnostic models dropped 0.15 and 0.22 on slightly and strongly blurred images, respectively, and deblurring models restored 0.14 and 0.17 for each group. The sharpness ratings perceived by dermatologists improved from 1.87 to 2.51 after deblurring. Activation maps showed the focus of diagnostic models was compromised by the blurriness but was restored after deblurring. Conclusions: Deep learning models can restore the diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic models for blurry images and increase image sharpness perceived by dermatologists. The model can be incorporated into teledermatology to help the diagnosis of blurry images. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oral finasteride and topical minoxidil are the current standard of care for male androgenetic alopecia and a combination of the two treatments can be considered for greater efficacy. Clinical trials of topical finasteride have also yielded promising results, but routine care data are lacking. Aims: To examine patient‐reported outcomes of men with androgenetic alopecia who received topical finasteride admixed with minoxidil compared to the current standard of care (oral finasteride). Methods: Retrospective, cross‐sectional study with data from a German direct‐to‐consumer teledermatology platform between December 2021 and January 2023. Patient‐reported outcomes were collected through voluntary follow‐up questionnaires provided after 6 weeks on topical finasteride/minoxidil or oral finasteride treatment. Results: A total of 1545 patients who received topical finasteride/minoxidil treatment were included; 238 (15.4%) participated in the follow‐up questionnaire. At week six, 62.2% (148/238) reported positive changes in their hair appearance, and 44.1% (105/238) reported an improvement of self‐esteem. Treatment‐related adverse events were reported in 11.8% (28/238). Full treatment adherence was observed in 74.4% (177/238). Comparing the topical treatment group to those receiving oral finasteride, lower treatment adherence was reported, along with higher rates of local adverse events; no difference was found in the incidence of sexual adverse events. Conclusion: Based on patient‐reported outcomes, topical finasteride/minoxidil seems to be effective and well tolerated, but not superior to oral finasteride. Lower treatment adherence for topical usage must be considered when considering treatment options. Additional real‐world data are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical finasteride/minoxidil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Dermatologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Background Although the number of teledermatology studies is increasing, not all variables have been researched in equal depth, so there remains a lack of robust evidence for some teledermatology initiatives. This review describes the landscape of teledermatology research and identifies knowledge gaps and research needs. This evidence map can be used to inform clinicians about the current knowledge about teledermatology and guide researchers for future studies. Methods Our evidence map was conducted according to the Campbell Collaboration checklist for evidence and gap maps. Eight databases were searched (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, and OpenGray), and only included systematic reviews of teledermatology involving humans published in English; while excluding non-systematic reviews (i.e., abstracts, conference proceedings, editorials, commentaries, or letters). From 909 records, 14 systematic reviews published between 2004 and 2022 were included. Our analysis focused on the systematic reviews’ characteristics, dermatological conditions studied, rate of overlap and quality assessment of primary studies reviewed, and main findings reported. Results Teledermatology was reportedly comparable with clinic dermatology and generally accepted by patients as a mode of care delivery for dermatological conditions. However, there are concerns about privacy, communication, completeness of information transmitted, familiarity with the technology, and technical problems. Healthcare professionals were generally satisfied with teledermatology but found telemedicine consultations longer than face-to-face consultations, and less confident in asynchronous teledermatology than conventional consultations. Teledermatology was reportedly more cost-effective than clinic dermatology; especially considering the distance traveled by patients, referral volume to teledermatology, and clinic dermatology costs. Although patients and providers are satisfied with teledermatology, face-to-face dermatology has higher diagnostic and management accuracy. Teledermatology was also used for training medical professionals. Regarding the validity and reliability of teledermatology outcome measures, no significant discussions were found. Conclusions COVID-19 spotlighted telemedicine in clinical care, and we must ensure telemedicine continually improves with robust research. Further research is necessary for establishing a standardized outcome set, enhancing accuracy, concordance, cost-effectiveness, and safety, comparing teledermatology with non-dermatologist care, examining its effectiveness in non-Western low and middle-income countries, and incorporating patient involvement for improved study design. Systematic review registration https://www.researchregistry.com/ (Unique Identifying Number: reviewregistry878).

Abstract Asynchronous teledermatology (TD) has shown promise in improving access to dermatological care, yet studies reveal varied methodologies and results. This study aimed to design a mobile app using the store-and-forward model, marking a pioneering effort in Iran to facilitate written documentation of patient history and skin lesion imagery for accurate diagnosis. Conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, this study involved the development and implementation of a smartphone app to collect clinical data and photographs from 89 patients at a dermatology clinic. Diagnoses made at the clinic served as the gold standard. Three dermatologists independently reviewed the app-recorded data, providing diagnoses that were compared to in-person assessments using the Kappa coefficient and agreement percentage. Lesions were predominantly located on the whole body (47%), with psoriasis (19.1%), acne vulgaris (11.2%), and eczema (10%) being the most common. The overall inter-observer Kappa value demonstrated excellent agreement at 0.856. The study's findings endorse the use of a mobile app for TD as an effective adjunct in regions with scarce dermatological services, such as Iran. To promote the broader application of TD, ongoing research is essential to further establish its reliability and practicality.

Telemedicine emerged as an alternative care delivery system used to offer effective long-term management to patients with chronic, inflammatory conditions such as psoriatic disease. Teledermatology can provide reliable clinical information through thorough history-taking and virtual evaluations that include patient-provided images and disease activity assessment tools that may help accurately diagnose and manage patients with psoriasis. The integration of validated screening tools for psoriatic arthritis and effective teledermatology practices may improve access to specialists, thus avoiding preventable delays in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Although the provision of telehealthcare should not completely replace high quality, in-person dermatologic or rheumatologic visits, the convenience and collaborative nature of teledermatology may lead to expanded access and expedited care in the appropriate setting, whether it be in a virtual or in-person visit.

Abstract Introduction Up to 25% of children and 5.6% of adults in the USA have atopic dermatitis (AD), with substantial impacts on quality of life. Effective control can be challenging despite therapy efforts. The emergence of information and communication technologies (ICT) in AD management prompted this study to assess its impact on self-management. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess outcomes from peer-reviewed clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of teledermatology, mobile health (mHealth) apps, and electronic devices for managing AD. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase for articles written in English and published until May 2023. Results Twelve trials with 2424 participants were selected from 811 studies. A meta-analysis of 1038 individuals reported a mean difference (MD) of −1.57 [95% confidence interval (CI): −2.24, −0.91] for the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). A meta-analysis of 495 individuals reported a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) MD of −0.59 [95% CI: −0.95, −0.23]. Despite heterogeneity (I 2 = 47% and I 2 = 74%), the impact was significant (P ≤ 0.001). SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) showed an insignificant MD of −0.12 (P = 0.91). Conclusion mHealth applications and telemonitoring show significant improvement in patients’ quality of life (DLQI) and self-management (POEM) but no significant impact on AD severity (SCORAD).

Abstract Introduction Teledermatology is the practice of dermatology through communication technologies. The aim of this study is to analyze its implementation in a Spanish health area during its first two years. Methods Cross-sectional descriptive study. It included interconsultations between dermatologists and family physicians in the Salamanca Health Area (Spain) after the implementation of the non-face-to-face modality over a period of two consecutive years. A total of 25,424 consultations were performed (20,912 face-to-face and 4,512 non-face-to-face); 1000 were selected by random sampling, half of each modality. Main measures: referral rate, response time and resolution time, type of pathology, diagnostic concordance, and quality of consultation. Results The annual referral rate was 42.9/1000 inhabitants (35.3 face-to-face and 7.6 non-face- to-face). The rate of face-to-face referrals was higher in urban areas (37.1) and the rate of non- face-to-face referrals in rural areas (10.4). The response time for non-face-to-face consultations was 2.4 ± 12.7 days and 56 ± 34.8 days for face-to-face consultations (p

Monkeypox is a zoonotic disease caused by the monkeypox virus and classically presents as a vesicular rash accompanied by fever and lymphadenopathy. Singapore reported the first imported case of monkeypox infection on 21 June 2022, the first local unlinked case on 6 July 2022, and the first local linked case on 5 August 2022. Telemedicine was used in the management of monkeypox close contacts to (1) screen for the development of signs and symptoms consistent with monkeypox infection, (2) assess for successful post-exposure prophylaxis via direct visualisation of vaccination site morphological progression, (3) detect serious reactions arising from post-exposure prophylaxis administration, and (4) evaluate for deterioration in mental health status during the 21-day quarantine period. A case series of 13 close contacts who received post-exposure prophylaxis in the form of the ACAM2000 live Vaccinia virus preparation is presented, illustrating the safe and efficacious application of telemedicine in the clinical follow-up of quarantined close contacts throughout the 21-day incubation period, and post-exposure prophylaxis monitoring. Inherent limitations included difficulties in the assessment of sensitive areas such as the peri-genital and peri-anal regions and video quality–related issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, teledermatology became a popular mode of health care delivery. Thus, deciphering which diagnoses are best suited for synchronous video visits is important to guide providers on appropriate patient care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 1,647 submitted synchronous video visits from September 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 at a single, large academic institution. Results: Video visits' follow-up rate was significantly associated with diagnosis subtype (p < 0.001). Compared with patients with skin lesions and nonskin dermatologic conditions, patients with a rash had higher odds of being recommended to have their follow-up visit as a video visit (odds ratio [OR] = 0.222, p < 0.001; OR = 0.296, p < 0.001). Patients with a rash had lower odds of being recommended to have their follow-up visit as an in-person office visit when compared with skin lesions (OR = 9.679, p < 0.001), nonskin dermatologic conditions (OR = 4.055, p < 0.001), and other skin dermatologic conditions (OR = 2.23, p < 0.01). Demographically, employed, middle-aged patients with private insurance made up the majority of video visit usage. African American patients were less likely to utilize a video visit compared with Asian patients (OR = 2.06, p < 0.038). Conclusions: Certain dermatologic diagnoses, most notably rashes, are more conducive to video visit management. Rashes made up 86% of new patient video visits, were more likely to have video visit follow-up if needed and were more likely to not require further follow-up indicating that the management of rashes from initial diagnosis to completion in care is suitable for video visit management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This research investigates the use of teledermoscopy, a method that involves patients using a smartphone dermatoscope attachment to take pictures of skin lesions for remote evaluation by dermatologists. This approach aims to reduce the need for in-person visits for skin cancer screening and triage. This study found that incorporating smartphone dermatoscope images significantly reduced the number of lesions requiring in-person evaluation compared to clinical images alone. This suggests that patient-led teledermoscopy could decrease unnecessary visits for benign lesions, potentially improving access to dermatology consultations for patients with suspicious or malignant lesions. Overall, this research highlights a promising strategy to enhance skin cancer detection and streamline healthcare delivery in dermatology through telemedicine. Introduction: Teledermatology, defined as the use of remote imaging technologies to provide dermatologic healthcare services to individuals in a distant setting, has grown considerably in popularity since its widespread implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teledermoscopy employs a smartphone dermatoscope attachment paired with a smartphone camera to visualize colors and microstructures within the epidermis and superficial dermis that cannot be seen with the naked eye ABCD criteria alone. Methods: Our retrospective observational cohort and case–control study evaluated the utility of loaning a smartphone dermatoscope attachment to patients for remote triage of self-selected lesions of concern for skin cancer. The primary outcome was the number (percentage) of in-person follow-up visits required for patients who submitted lesion images, either with or without accompanying dermoscopic images. A medical record review was conducted on all Oregon Health & Science University Department of Dermatology spot check image submissions utilizing the smartphone dermatoscopes between August 2020 and August 2022. De-identified dermoscopic images of lesions that included corresponding non-dermoscopic clinical images in their submission (n = 70) were independently reviewed by a blinded expert dermoscopist. The expert used standard clinical algorithms (ABCD criteria for clinical images; dermoscopy three-point checklist for dermoscopic images) to determine whether the imaged lesion should be converted to an in-person visit for further evaluation and consideration for biopsy. Results: Of the 70 lesions submitted with corresponding clinical and dermoscopy images, 60 met the criteria for in-person evaluation from clinical (non-dermoscopic) image review compared to 28 meeting the criteria for in-person evaluation from dermoscopic images of the same lesion. Thus, a 53% reduction in conversion to an in-person consultation with the addition of smartphone dermatoscope images in virtual lesion triage was observed (p < 0.001, McNemar's Test). Conclusion: Implementing patient-led teledermoscopy may reduce the frequency of in-person visits for benign lesions and consequently improve access to in-person dermatology consultations for patients with concerning and possibly malignant lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, teledermatology has rapidly emerged as a healthcare delivery method with potential implications for managing chronic inflammatory dermatoses like atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: This study assesses the utility of telemedicine in the management of AD by comparing virtual care with traditional in-office visits with the aim of identifying differences in clinical outcomes between these 2 healthcare delivery modalities. Methods: Patients of all ages with AD were recruited from 2 dermatology practices. Consecutive patients presenting to the clinics who met the inclusion criteria were invited to enrol in the study. Those who consented to participate were randomly assigned to the virtual or in-person arm of the study, with the opportunity to decline care in either study arm. The inclusion criteria required participants to have a confirmed diagnosis of AD. Exclusion criteria included significant comorbidity that might affect the course of treatment, inaccessibility to teleconsults such as not having a camera for video conferences, and self-declared limitations in operating Zoom. Patients were assessed at baseline (week 0), 4 to 6 weeks, and 8 to 12 weeks using 6 efficacy parameters. Results: In the virtual group, all 6 dermatological measures suggested improved outcomes. Average Body Surface Area scores decreased (β = −.07, 95% CI = −0.1, −0.3) over the course of follow-up. Virtual care patients had 80% lower odds of moderate-to-severe uncontrolled disease (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.06, 0.5) and pruritus (OR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.7) over time. Conclusions: This study supports teledermatology as a feasible and effective option for providing follow-up care for atopic dermatitis patients of various demographic standings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: One of the challenges faced by the Colombian Health System is to improve access to health services for the dispersed and isolated rural population, particularly in the field of dermatology. This article examines the implementation of a teledermatology service using a PC and camera versus smartphone technology. Methods: A total of 542 teledermatology visits were conducted, involving 478 patients, in addition to 64 visits for clinical follow-up for patients as per the dermatologist's recommendation. Out of the 478 patients, 461 met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study. The data collection instrument from the general practitioner or referring provider covered three consultation moments: (1) sending an initial consultation, (2) providing a response to the patient, and (3) sending a follow-up consultation. Seven hundred forty-seven records were completed by the general practitioner for the three consultation moments. Furthermore, 372 consultations were documented by the dermatologist or referring provider for two moments: (1) response to the initial consultation by the dermatologist, and (2) response to the follow-up consultation by the dermatologist. After validating the information reported in the instruments, a descriptive analysis of the data was conducted, utilizing absolute frequencies and percentages for qualitative variables and measures of central tendency (mean, median, standard deviation, and interquartile range) for quantitative variables. The data were analyzed from 747 records of the referring provider instrument related to 461 patients, between 18 and 98 years of age, with a predominantly female representation. Results: The results indicated that for teleconsultations conducted using a mobile device, the average total duration of the teleconsultation was longer on the traditional platform compared with the mobile device (13.03 vs. 8.27 min). Additionally, it was observed that the time taken to store, send, and capture a single image (clinical or dermoscopic) using the mobile device was three times lower than that on the conventional platform (25 vs. 75 s). Similar findings were noted for teleconsultations carried out by the dermatologist, predominantly utilizing a mobile device. The average consultation time was shorter for the mobile device compared with the traditional platform (8.14 vs. 12 min). Conclusions: The cost reduction suggests that the operation of the service is more efficient with smartphone technology in comparison to the use of a PC and camera. Teledermatology with smartphones provides a streamlined, efficient, and technically sound process for obtaining clinical and dermoscopic images. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper explores the role of teledermatology (TD) in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) at various stages of patient care. The study aims to assess the benefits, limitations, and patient experiences surrounding TD integration into MMS practices. We conducted a PubMed search using keywords related to TD and MMS, categorizing selected articles into pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative stages of MMS. TD reduced waiting times (26.10 days for TD compared to 60.57 days for face-to-face [FTF]) and consultation failure rates (6% for TD vs. 17% for FTF) for MMS preoperative consultations. It also shortened time to treatment by two weeks and led to notable travel savings (162.7 min, 144.5 miles, and $60.00 per person). Telepathology facilitated communication and decision-making during MMS, improving accuracy and efficiency, especially in challenging cases requiring collaboration where physical presence of another surgeon or pathologist is not feasible. Telepathology definitively diagnosed benign lesions and malignant tumors in 81.8% of cases (18/22). Additionally, there was a 95% agreement between conventional light microscopy diagnosis and telepathology in tumors (19/20), and 100% agreement for all 20 Mohs frozen section consultations. For post-operative follow-up, telephone follow-up (TFU) and text messaging proved effective, cost-efficient alternatives with high patient satisfaction (94% in New Zealand and 96% in the U.K.) and early complication identification. This study underscores TD's multifaceted benefits in MMS: enhanced patient experience preoperatively, improved communication during surgery, and cost-effective postoperative follow-up. Limitations include the financial expense and technical issues that can arise with TD (connectivity problems, delays in video/audio transmission, etc.). Further studies are needed to explore emerging TD modalities in post-operative patient management. The integration of TD into MMS signifies a progressive step in dermatological care, offering convenient, cost-effective, and better solutions with the potential to enhance patient experiences and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Up to 25% of children and 5.6% of adults in the USA have atopic dermatitis (AD), with substantial impacts on quality of life. Effective control can be challenging despite therapy efforts. The emergence of information and communication technologies (ICT) in AD management prompted this study to assess its impact on self-management. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess outcomes from peer-reviewed clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of teledermatology, mobile health (mHealth) apps, and electronic devices for managing AD. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase for articles written in English and published until May 2023. Results: Twelve trials with 2424 participants were selected from 811 studies. A meta-analysis of 1038 individuals reported a mean difference (MD) of −1.57 [95% confidence interval (CI): −2.24, −0.91] for the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). A meta-analysis of 495 individuals reported a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) MD of −0.59 [95% CI: −0.95, −0.23]. Despite heterogeneity (I2 = 47% and I2 = 74%), the impact was significant (P ≤ 0.001). SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) showed an insignificant MD of −0.12 (P = 0.91). Conclusion: mHealth applications and telemonitoring show significant improvement in patients' quality of life (DLQI) and self-management (POEM) but no significant impact on AD severity (SCORAD). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnostic accuracy rate of live videoconferencing (LVC) teledermatology, by board‐certified dermatologists compared to non‐dermatologists has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of board‐certified dermatologists, dermatology specialty trainees, and board‐certified internists in LVC teledermatology. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of clinicians from different specialties in diagnosing the same group of patients. The clinicians were isolated from each other during the diagnosis process. We enrolled 18 volunteer physicians (six board‐certified dermatologists, six dermatology specialty trainees, and six board‐certified internists) who reviewed the skin conditions of 18 patients via LVC teledermatology. The diagnostic accuracy of the participating physicians was evaluated using the final diagnosis as the reference standard. The diagnostic accuracy averages were compared according to the physicians' specialties and disease categories. The mean ± standard deviation diagnostic accuracy of the most detailed level diagnosis was 83.3% ± 3.5% (range, 77.8%–89.0%) for board‐certified dermatologists, 53.7 ± 20.7% (range 27.8%–77.8%) for dermatology specialty trainees, and 27.8 ± 5.0% (range, 22.2%–33.3%) for board‐certified internists. Board‐certified dermatologists showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy, not only against board‐certified internists (p < 0.0001) but also against dermatology specialty trainees (p < 0.05). Disease categories with high accuracy rates (≥80%) only by board‐certified dermatologists were inflammatory papulosquamous dermatoses (87.5%), compared to 58.3%, and 20.8% for dermatology specialty trainees and board‐certified internists respectively). For inflammatory erythemas and other reactive inflammatory dermatoses the accuracy rates for board‐certified dermatologists, dermatology specialty trainees, and board‐certified internists were 83.3%, 33.3%, 8.3% respectively; for melanoma in situ neoplasms, 83.3%, 50.0%, 66.7% respectively), and for genetic disorders of keratinization 83.3%, 33.3%, and 0% respectively). Our findings showed that board‐certified dermatologists may have high diagnostic accuracy with practical safety and effectiveness in LVC teledermatology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Telemedicine, including teledermatology, has become a central component of modern medicine. Its importance, especially during the COVID‐19 pandemic, underlines its potential to optimize access to dermatological care. The study aims to assess the potential of teledermatology, understand the importance of linking digital and physical practices, and analyze the adoption of online services based on participants' demographic and experiential factors. Methods: This cross‐sectional survey was conducted among users of the telemedicine platform from July 2022 to March 2023. The platform ("OnlineDoctor") allows users to contact dermatologists for remote dermatological consultations. The survey included questions about the participants' dermatological concerns, their reasons for using teledermatology, their satisfaction with the recommendations and their willingness to continue using telemedicine in the future. Data was collected via the RedCap online platform. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were carried out. Results: Overall, 1141 people participated in the study (mean age 44.0 years [SD 14.6], 61.4% women). Results showed that 52.7% of participants with skin conditions had not consulted a dermatologist in the previous year. Shorter waiting times and the lack of face‐to‐face appointments were the main reasons for using the online platform. In total, 77.6% (n = 885) of participants indicated they would use teledermatology as their first choice if they had an upcoming skin condition. Age, gender, and satisfaction with previous consultations impacted the use of teledermatology as the first choice for future skin conditions. Conclusion: Teledermatology is characterized by various benefits, including reduced waiting times and improved accessibility to treatment. Nevertheless, the study underscores the importance of a hybrid care approach involving direct interaction with physicians. Teledermatology can be transformative in meeting dermatologic needs, mainly when traditional face‐to‐face consultation is limited. A deep understanding of user preferences and widespread adoption of digital services can pave the way for the successful adoption of teledermatology platforms, improving healthcare accessibility and efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Teledermatology is the practice of dermatology through communication technologies. The aim of this study is to analyze its implementation in a Spanish health area during its first two years. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study. It included interconsultations between dermatologists and family physicians in the Salamanca Health Area (Spain) after the implementation of the non-face-to-face modality over a period of two consecutive years. A total of 25,424 consultations were performed (20,912 face-to-face and 4,512 non-face-to-face); 1000 were selected by random sampling, half of each modality. Main measures: referral rate, response time and resolution time, type of pathology, diagnostic concordance, and quality of consultation. Results: The annual referral rate was 42.9/1000 inhabitants (35.3 face-to-face and 7.6 non-face- to-face). The rate of face-to-face referrals was higher in urban areas (37.1) and the rate of non- face-to-face referrals in rural areas (10.4). The response time for non-face-to-face consultations was 2.4 ± 12.7 days and 56 ± 34.8 days for face-to-face consultations (p < 0.001). The resolution rate for non-face-to-face consultations was 44%. Diagnostic concordance, assessed by the kappa index, was 0.527 for face-to-face consultations and 0.564 for non-face-to-face consultations. Greater compliance with the quality criteria in the non-attendance consultations. Conclusions: Teledermatology appears to be an efficient tool in the resolution of dermatological problems, with a rapid, effective, and higher quality response for attention to skin pathologies. Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05625295. Registered on 21 November 2022 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT05625295). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Teledermatology provides a platform for swift specialist advice without the potential need for face‐to‐face review. Our objectives were to investigate the effectiveness, accuracy and diagnostic concordance of the platform with regard to the remote management of skin conditions. Methods: We undertook a single‐centre, retrospective chart review over a 1‐year period, comprising a total of 1703 teledermatology referrals. Two physicians independently assessed the diagnostic concordance between telederm diagnosis (TD), in‐person diagnosis (ID) and histopathological diagnosis (HD). Results: There were a total of 1703 TD referrals, of which 341 were rejected, leaving 1362 referrals for evaluation. Sixty‐five per cent of these referrals were managed remotely and discharged with advice, although 4.6% of these were later re‐referred for an in‐person review. A total of 20% of referrals were rejected, of which the majority was due to a lack of appropriate imaging. The total concordance of TD compared to ID was 76.4%. When comparing the TD and ID/HD, we obtained a Kappa value of 0.636 indicating substantial agreement. In terms of accuracy, there were 49 biopsy‐proven skin cancers picked up by the service in this cohort of data. Of these, 61.2% were given an accurate diagnosis on first impression via teledermatology, 14.3% were given a different diagnosis but correctly categorised as skin cancer and 24.5% could not be assessed; however, they were triaged and escalated based upon clinical suspicion. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that teledermatology is an effective platform in terms of diagnosis and remote management, with adequate diagnostic accuracy and concordance to in‐person diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An eConsult is a growing teledermatology tool that has the potential to address health disparities. Trends in teledermatology usage are still being defined in the context of the pandemic, postpandemic recovery, and a growing nonphysician primary care provider population. Objective: The aim was to understand teledermatology utilization trends for asynchronous dermatology eConsults in the geographically expansive state of Texas. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study examined the eConsult tool within a large, nonprofit health system, comparing characteristics of 893 eConsult visits with 27,189 in-person dermatology encounters from January 2022 to March 2023. Results: When comparing the demographics of patients seen through eConsult versus traditional in-person visits, eConsults demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of pediatric (22.5% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.001), Hispanic/Latino (20.5% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001), African American (12.5% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001), Asian (4.6% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001), and American Indian (1.0% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.049) patients compared with in-person visits. eConsult users came from areas with a lower percentage of bachelor's degree holders, reduced average household income, and an increased proportion of Medicaid and Tricare users. Physicians (MD/DO) submitted more eConsult cases than nonphysician providers (NPPs), with comparable diagnostic agreement with teledermatologists and similar recommendation rates for in-person dermatology visits. Conclusions: While the limitation of this study was that it was a descriptive data analysis in a single health care system with limited generalizability, eConsults hold promise to broaden dermatologic access for underserved groups, especially children, individuals from underrepresented backgrounds, and Medicaid and Tricare members. While no significant diagnostic or referral differences were seen for eConsults initiated by primary care physician and NPPs, these changing trends should continue to be examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the growth of telemedicine. The challenge was in the way of dermatologists, who needed a comprehensive examination of the lesions. Here, we tried a tele-management of patients with autoimmune bullous diseases. Methods:This cross-sectional study was conducted on confirmed bullous disorder cases. Demographic data and the status of COVID-19 infection were assessed in the patients. Some of the cases were provided online, and some with office visits. Drug and treatment plan changes were compared between these two groups. All statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 20. Result:Totally, 100 patients, including 46 males (46.0%) and 54 females (54.0%), 48.15 ± 11.11 years old, were studied. Among them, 73 were pemphigus vulgaris (73.0%), 11 were bullous pemphigoid (11.0%), 10 were pemphigus foliaceus (10.0%), and the other 6 (6.0%) were categorized as other autoimmune bullous diseases. During the pandemic, 38 cases (38.0%) had COVID-19 infection. 72 patients had office and 28 had online visits. Treatment plans after visits during the pandemic (p = 0.588) and drug dose change (p = 0.297) showed no significant difference between office and online visits. Conclusion:Our patients tended to plan office visits more than online; however, we found no differences regarding the plan or treatment changes. Online visit has good efficacy, but further investigation in case of provision of a suitable platform and getting the attention of the patients is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Short-term teledermoscopic monitoring helps to distinguish early melanomas from nevi. As the incidence of melanoma is increasing, there are several benefits of patients taking their own dermoscopic images, but only a few previous studies have investigated the feasibility of this approach. Objectives: We sought to examine patient ability to take evaluable dermoscopic images of atypical melanocytic lesions in need of short-term monitoring. Methods: Patients were asked to take follow-up images in their homes using a borrowed dermoscope and their own smartphone. We investigated if the management decision differed when assessing follow-up images taken by patients compared to follow-up images taken by hospital staff. Lesions were rated as either changed, unchanged, or in need of further monitoring. In addition, image quality and patients’ attitudes towards taking dermoscopic follow-up images were studied. Results: Ninety-five patients with 132 lesions completed the study. Images taken by hospital staff were of better quality than images taken by patients (P

Abstract is missing (Quiz)

BACKGROUND: In-hospital dermatological care has shifted from dedicated dermatology wards to consultation services, and some consulted patients may require postdischarge follow-up in outpatient dermatology. Safe and timely care transitions from inpatient-to-outpatient specialty care are critical for patient health, but communication around these transitions can be disjointed, and workflows can be complex. OBJECTIVE: In this 3-phase quality improvement effort, we developed and evaluated an intervention that leveraged an electronic health record (EHR) feature, known as SmartPhrase, to enable a new workflow to improve transitions from inpatient care to outpatient dermatology. METHODS: Phase 1 (February-March 2021) included interviews with patients and process mapping with key stakeholders to identify gaps and inform an intervention: a SmartPhrase table and associated workflow to promote collection of patient information needed for scheduling follow-up and closed-loop communication between dermatology and scheduling teams. In phase 2 (April-May 2021), semistructured interviews-with dermatologists (n=5), dermatology residents (n=5), and schedulers (n=6)-identified pain points and refinements. In phase 3, the intervention was evaluated by triangulating data from these interviews with measured changes in scheduling efficiency, visit completion, and messaging volume preimplementation (January-February 2021) and postimplementation (April-May 2021). RESULTS: Preintervention pain points included unclear workflow for care transitions, limited patient input in follow-up planning, multiple messaging channels (eg, EHR based, email, and phone messages), and time-inefficient patient tracking. The intervention addressed most pain points; interviewees reported the intervention was easy to adopt and improved scheduling efficiency, workload, and patient involvement. More visits were completed within the desired timeframe of 14 days after discharge during the postimplementation period (21/47, 45%) than the preimplementation period (28/41, 68%; P=.03). The messaging workload also decreased from 88 scheduling-related messages sent for 25 patients before implementation to 30 messages for 8 patients after implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient-to-outpatient specialty care transitions are complex and involve multiple stakeholders, thus requiring multifaceted solutions. With deliberate evaluation, broad stakeholder input, and iteration, we designed and implemented a successful solution using a standard EHR feature, SmartPhrase, integrated into a standardized workflow to improve the timeliness of posthospital specialty care and reduce workload.

Abstract Background Difficulty obtaining a dermatological consultation is an obstacle to the early diagnosis of melanoma. On the one hand, patients survival depends on the lesion thickness at the time of diagnosis. On the other hand, dermatologists treat many patients with benign lesions. Optimizing patient care pathways is a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the e-mail transmission of photographs of suspected melanoma lesions between general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists reduces the time to dermatological consultation for patients whose suspicious skin lesions ultimately require resection. Methods We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled study in primary care involving 51 French GPs between April 2017 and August 2019. A total of 250 patients referred to a dermatologist for a suspected melanoma lesion were included GPs were randomized to either the smartphone arm or the usual care arm. In the smartphone arm, the GPs referred patients to the dermatologist by sending 2 photographs of the suspicious lesion using their smartphone. The dermatologist then had to set up an appointment at an appropriate time. In the usual care arm, GPs referred patients to a dermatologist according to their usual practice. The primary outcome was the time to dermatological consultation for patients whose lesion ultimately required resection. Results 57 GPs volunteered were randomized (27 to the smartphone arm, and 30 to the usual care arm). A total of 125 patients were included in each arm (mean age: 49.8 years; 53% women) and followed 8 months. Twenty-three dermatologists participated in the study. The time to dermatological consultation for patients whose suspicious skin lesion required resection was 56.5 days in the smartphone arm and 63.7 days in the usual care arm (mean adjusted time reduction: -18.5 days, 95% CI [-74.1;23.5], p = .53). Conclusions The e-mail transmission of photographs from GPs to dermatologists did not improve the dermatological management of patients whose suspicious skin lesions ultimately required resection. Further research is needed to validate quality criteria that might be useful for tele-expertise in dermatology. Trial Registration Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under reference number NCT03137511 (May 2, 2017).

Nello Tommasino, Matteo Megna, Sara Cacciapuoti, Alessia Villani, Fabrizio Martora, Angelo Ruggiero, Lucia Genco, Luca Potestio Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, ItalyCorrespondence: Luca Potestio, Section of Dermatology - Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, 80131, Italy, Tel +39 - 081 – 7462457, Fax +39 - 081 – 7462442, Email potestioluca@gmail.comAbstract: Teledermatology may be defined as the application of telemedicine to dermatology. According to published data, teledermatology is more widespread in Europe and North America, probably where resources for health care are greater than in other areas of the world. Indeed, teledermatology requires advanced technology to be efficient, as high image quality is necessary to allow the dermatologist to make correct diagnoses. Thanks to the recent advances in this field, teledermatology is become routinary in daily clinical practice. However, its use has been improved over time, overcoming several challenges. The aim of this narrative review is to retrace the almost 30-year history of teledermatology, to address the new challenges posed by advancing technologies such as artificial intelligence and the implications it may have on healthcare.Keywords: teledermatology, artificial intelligence, dermatology

Abstract Background With the increasing incidence of skin cancer and limited access to specialised care, teledermoscopy (TDS) may represent a useful triage tool for skin cancer detection. Objectives An evaluation of a 3‐year TDS project in primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in Belgium (TELESPOT project). Methods A total of nine PHCs were trained to use an in‐house developed smartphone‐based application for macroscopic and dermoscopic acquisition of skin lesions, subsequently analysed independently by two investigators in a tertiary university skin cancer centre. The primary outcome was the proportion of high‐priority management (HPM) recommendations. Secondary outcomes included the TDS diagnoses, the quality of image acquisition, the mean time between HPM recommendations and subsequent surgery, the correlation between HPM reports and histopathology after surgery as well as patient and general practitioner satisfaction scores. All the endpoints were compared between the initial year of the TDS project and the subsequent 2‐year extension period of the study. Results Over 3 years, a total of 478 lesions were analysed in 335 patients: initial phase (105 lesions from 76 patients in six PHCs) and extension phase (373 lesions from 259 patients in nine PHCs). An HPM was recommended in 9.2% (initial and extension phases: 7.6% and 15.7%, respectively). The dermoscopic‐histological correlation achieved 84.1%. The median delay between HPM and surgery was 9 days. Conclusions This TDS project avoided unnecessary tertiary care visits in about 9 out of 10 cases, increased the HPM by a ninefold in comparison with the conventional care pathway and provided excellent satisfaction levels for PHCs and patients. Long‐term participation improved the triage quality for suspect skin lesions by 2.24‐fold.

Background: Difficulty obtaining a dermatological consultation is an obstacle to the early diagnosis of melanoma. On the one hand, patients survival depends on the lesion thickness at the time of diagnosis. On the other hand, dermatologists treat many patients with benign lesions. Optimizing patient care pathways is a major concern. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the e-mail transmission of photographs of suspected melanoma lesions between general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists reduces the time to dermatological consultation for patients whose suspicious skin lesions ultimately require resection. Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled study in primary care involving 51 French GPs between April 2017 and August 2019. A total of 250 patients referred to a dermatologist for a suspected melanoma lesion were included GPs were randomized to either the smartphone arm or the usual care arm. In the smartphone arm, the GPs referred patients to the dermatologist by sending 2 photographs of the suspicious lesion using their smartphone. The dermatologist then had to set up an appointment at an appropriate time. In the usual care arm, GPs referred patients to a dermatologist according to their usual practice. The primary outcome was the time to dermatological consultation for patients whose lesion ultimately required resection. Results: 57 GPs volunteered were randomized (27 to the smartphone arm, and 30 to the usual care arm). A total of 125 patients were included in each arm (mean age: 49.8 years; 53% women) and followed 8 months. Twenty-three dermatologists participated in the study. The time to dermatological consultation for patients whose suspicious skin lesion required resection was 56.5 days in the smartphone arm and 63.7 days in the usual care arm (mean adjusted time reduction: -18.5 days, 95% CI [-74.1;23.5], p =.53). Conclusions: The e-mail transmission of photographs from GPs to dermatologists did not improve the dermatological management of patients whose suspicious skin lesions ultimately required resection. Further research is needed to validate quality criteria that might be useful for tele-expertise in dermatology. Trial Registration: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under reference number NCT03137511 (May 2, 2017). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction:Teledermatology adoption continues to increase, in part, spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzes the utility and cost savings of a store-and-forward teledermatology consultative system within the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods:Retrospective cohort of 4,493 patients across 14 remote sites in Tennessee and Kentucky from May 2017 through August 2019. The study measured the agreement between the teledermatology diagnoses and follow-up face-to-face clinic evaluations as well as the cost effectiveness of the teledermatology program over the study period. Results:Fifty-four percent of patients were recommended for face-to-face appointment for biopsy or further evaluation. Most patients, 80.5% received their face-to-face care by a VA dermatologist. There was a high level of concordance between teledermatologist and clinic dermatologist for pre-malignant and malignant cutaneous conditions. Veterans were seen faster at a VA clinic compared with a community dermatology site. Image quality improved as photographers incorporated teledermatologist feedback. From a cost perspective, teledermatology saved the VA system $1,076,000 in community care costs. Discussion:Teledermatology is a useful diagnostic tool within the VA system providing Veteran care at a cost savings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dermatology consultations in Québec, Canada, face accessibility challenges, with most dermatologists concentrated in urban areas. Teledermatology, offering remote diagnosis and treatment, holds promise in overcoming these limitations. However, concerns regarding patient-doctor relationships and logistical issues exist. Objectives: This article aims to introduce a dermatology patient learning pathway (PLP) developed by the Centre of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public (CEPPP), focusing on knowledge, abilities, and skills mobilized by patients and their loved ones at key moments of the life course with an illness, as well as emerging educational needs. Methods: The PLP development was co-developed with dermatology patient and caregiver partners, stakeholders, and the CEPPP team. The process encompassed stakeholder engagement, exploration, recruitment of patient and caregiver partners, co-development of the PLP draft, and validation through consensus building. Results: The PLP methodology led to the creation of 44 learning objectives, comprising a total of 107 subobjectives. These objectives were organized into 8 phases of the patient life course with a dermatological condition: (1) prevention and predisposition; (2) discovery, self-examination, or observation of a change; (3) first consultation; (4) wandering; (5) consultation with a dermatologist; (6) diagnosis; (7) treatments; and (8) living with it. Conclusions: The dermatology PLP serves as a resource outlining patient competency across different stages of managing a dermatological condition throughout their life course. In the context of teledermatology, the PLP might facilitate patient and caregiver engagement by helping select appropriate information and tools to support active participation in care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Since during the COVID-19 pandemic nail psoriasis was evaluated exclusively with teledermatology, dermatologists started to face the difficulty in rating it concurrent with other onycopathies (i.e., onychotillomania and onychophagy). Thus, we aimed to improve the existing severity scores and verify the value in different clinical settings (i.e., in person vs. teledermatology (video or picture)). Methods: This multicenter prospective observational study evaluated patients with nail psoriasis and screened them for onychophagy or onychotillomania in telemedicine from May 2020 to January 2021. For therapeutic purposes patients with nail psoriasis were followed and rated with the Nijmegen-Nail psoriasis Activity Index tooL (N-NAIL) for 9 months; at the same time, N-NAIL and a new dedicated index that monitor also the changes in nail dimension (Galeazzi-(G) N-NAIL) were tested for accuracy. We assessed inter- and intraobserver agreement for the three different settings (in person, video, and pictures). Results: In our cohort of 382 patients with nail psoriasis after a clinical and dermatoscopic assessment we found 20 (5.24%) patients with onychophagy and 17 (4.45%) patients with onychotillomania. Analysis of the impact of nail psoriasis on patients revealed that onycholysis and crumbing, followed by subungual hyperkeratosis, were the clinical signs that prevalently bothered patients. N-NAIL score displayed moderate intra- and interobserver agreement. Over the 9 months follow-up, N-NAIL vs. GN-NAIL displayed a solid correlation at all the examined time points, i.e., baseline and after 3, 6, and 9 months. Conclusion: We created a new tool, the GN-NAIL capable of efficiently scoring nail psoriasis severity in complex cases, such as patients with onychotillomania and onychophagy, and monitor response to treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although teledermatology has been proven internationally to be an effective and safe addition to the care of patients in primary care, there are few pilot projects implementing teledermatology in routine outpatient care in Germany. The aim of this cluster randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether referrals to dermatologists are reduced by implementing a store-and-forward teleconsultation system in general practitioner practices. Methods: Eight counties were cluster randomized to the intervention and control conditions. During the 1-year intervention period between July 2018 and June 2019, 46 general practitioner practices in the 4 intervention counties implemented a store-and-forward teledermatology system with Patient Data Management System interoperability. It allowed practice teams to initiate teleconsultations for patients with dermatologic complaints. In the four control counties, treatment as usual was performed. As primary outcome, number of referrals was calculated from routine health care data. Poisson regression was used to compare referral rates between the intervention practices and 342 control practices. Results: The primary analysis revealed no significant difference in referral rates (relative risk = 1.02; 95% confidence interval = 0.911–1.141; p =.74). Secondary analyses accounting for sociodemographic and practice characteristics but omitting county pairing resulted in significant differences of referral rates between intervention practices and control practices. Matched county pair, general practitioner age, patient age, and patient sex distribution in the practices were significantly related to referral rates. Conclusions: While a store-and-forward teleconsultation system was successfully implemented in the German primary health care setting, the intervention's effect was superimposed by regional factors. Such regional factors should be considered in future teledermatology research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In 2019, Maccabi Health Services (MHS) rolled out the store-and-forward "Dermadetect" teledermatology consultation (TC) application. Study goal was to analyze MHS records of TCs (August 2019–February 2021) for the rate and reasons for face-to-face consultations (FTFC) occurring shortly after a TC with emphasis on FTFCs resulting in a different diagnosis for the same indication. Methods: The records of FTFCs held up shortly after TCs were reviewed and classified into cases marked as unsuited for teledermatology, cases in which the indication differed, and cases with the same indication, which were analyzed for concordance of diagnoses. Results: Dermadetect was used by 12,815 MHS beneficiaries. In 30% of cases, following FTFC occurred within the subsequent 5 months, and 901 of them occurred in the subsequent 2 weeks and were analyzed. Thirty percent were not suited for teledermatology, 15% were held for a different indication, and 55% occurred for the same indication. The diagnosis concordance between the TC and recurrent FTFC for the same indication was 97.4%, with full concordance at 68.1% and partial concordance at 29.3%. Overall, 13 patients (1.4%) of the 901 patients using the application only once had a subsequent FTFC within 2 weeks and received a different diagnosis than the one given in the TC. Conclusions: When considering the implementation of store-and-forward TC's, a 30% rate of following FTFC's during the next 5 months should be considered when planning the reimbursement model. Diagnosis discordance may be disregarded due to its low rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction:Image quality and acquisition protocol adherence assessment is a neglected area in teledermatology. We examine if it is feasible to use deep learning methods to automate the assessment of the adherence of examinations to image acquisition protocols. In this study, we focused on the quality criteria of two image acquisition protocols: (1) approximation image and (2) panoramic image, as these are present in all teledermatology examination protocols currently used by the Santa Catarina State Integrated Telemedicine and Telehealth System (STT/SC). Methods:We use a data set of 36,102 teledermatological examinations performed at the STT/SC during 2021. As our validation process, we adopted standard machine learning metrics and an inter-rater agreement (IRA) study with 11 dermatologists. For the approximation image protocol, we used the Mask-Region based Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN) Object Detection Deep Learning (DL) architecture to identify the presence of a lesion identification tag and a ruler used to provide a frame reference of the lesion. For the panoramic image protocol, we used DensePose, a pose estimation DL, architecture to assess the presence of a whole patient body and its orientation. A combination of the two approaches was additionally validated through an IRA study between specialists. Results:Mask-RCNN achieved a score of 96% mean average precision (mAP), while DensePose presented 75% mAP. IRA achieved a level of agreement of 96.68% with the Krippendorff alpha score. Conclusions:Our results show the feasibility of using deep learning to automate the image quality and protocol adherence assessment in teledermatology, before the specialist's manual analysis of the examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:Early detection of melanoma improves survival; however, patients face long wait times to receive dermatology care. Teledermatology (TD) is a promising tool to optimize access to care and has shown promise for the identification of malignancies but has not been well studied for melanoma. We evaluated the utility of TD as a triage tool to allow high-risk lesions of concern to be seen more expeditiously. Methods:Patient sociodemographic factors and histological characteristics of 836 melanomas biopsied between March 2020 and November 2022 in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health system were retrospectively evaluated, stratified by initial appointment type of TD versus in-person visit. Results:Patients first seeking care through teledermatology had shorter wait times to initial evaluation (p < 0.001) and eventual biopsy (p < 0.001), and these melanomas had higher Breslow thickness (p < 0.001), were more ulcerated (p = 0.002), invasive (p = 0.001), and of a more aggressive subtype (p = 0.007) than those initially evaluated in-person. TD was also utilized by a higher proportion of younger (p = 0.001) and non-white (p = 0.03) patients who identified their own lesion (p < 0.001). Conclusions:TD may be a strategy to improve melanoma outcomes by providing an accessible avenue of expedited care for high-risk lesions associated with worse clinical prognosticators of disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]