Search

Your search keyword '"Teixeira, Catia P."' showing total 20 results
Start Over Author "Teixeira, Catia P."
20 results on '"Teixeira, Catia P."'

3. Some Psychological Implications of Black Struggle

Author

Leach, Colin Wayne and Teixeira, Catia P.

Subjects
Violence -- Psychological aspects -- Social aspects, Political science, Social sciences
Abstract

Yet another long, hot summer in 2020 brought to the broader consciousness--in the US and well beyond--what Black folks have known for centuries about the ways in which racial hegemony [...]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Spatial agency bias and word order flexibility:a comparison of 14 European languages

Author

Suitner, Caterina, Maass, Anne, Navarrete, Eduardo, Formanowicz, Magdalena, Bratanova, Boyka, Cervone, Carmen, Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Kuppens, Toon, Lipourli, Eleni, Rakić, Tamara, Scatolon, Andrea, Teixeira, Catia P., Wang, Zhenlan, Pedro Sobral, Maria, Carrier, Antonin, Suitner, Caterina, Maass, Anne, Navarrete, Eduardo, Formanowicz, Magdalena, Bratanova, Boyka, Cervone, Carmen, Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Kuppens, Toon, Lipourli, Eleni, Rakić, Tamara, Scatolon, Andrea, Teixeira, Catia P., Wang, Zhenlan, Pedro Sobral, Maria, and Carrier, Antonin

Abstract

The Spatial Agency Bias predicts that people whose native language is rightward written will predominantly envisage action along the same direction. Two mechanisms contribute jointly to this asymmetry: (a) an embodied process related to writing/reading; (b) a linguistic regularity according to which sentence subjects (typically the agent) tend to precede objects (typically the recipient). Here we test a novel hypothesis in relation to the second mechanism, namely that this asymmetry will be most pronounced in languages with rigid word-order. A pre-registered study on 14 European languages (n=420) varying in word-order flexibility confirmed a rightward bias in drawings of interactions between two people (agent and recipient). This bias was weaker in more flexible languages, confirming that embodied and linguistic features of language interact in producing it.

Published
2021

10. Spatial agency bias and word order flexibility : a comparison of 14 European languages

Author

Suitner, Caterina, Maass, Anne, Navarrete, Eduardo, Formanowicz, Magdalena, Bratanova, Boyka, Cervone, Carmen, Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Kuppens, Toon, Lipourli, Eleni, Rakić, Tamara, Scatolon, Andrea, Teixeira, Catia P., Wang, Zhenlan, Pedro Sobral, Maria, Carrier, Antonin, Suitner, Caterina, Maass, Anne, Navarrete, Eduardo, Formanowicz, Magdalena, Bratanova, Boyka, Cervone, Carmen, Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Kuppens, Toon, Lipourli, Eleni, Rakić, Tamara, Scatolon, Andrea, Teixeira, Catia P., Wang, Zhenlan, Pedro Sobral, Maria, and Carrier, Antonin

Abstract

The Spatial Agency Bias predicts that people whose native language is rightward written will predominantly envisage action along the same direction. Two mechanisms contribute jointly to this asymmetry: (a) an embodied process related to writing/reading; (b) a linguistic regularity according to which sentence subjects (typically the agent) tend to precede objects (typically the recipient). Here we test a novel hypothesis in relation to the second mechanism, namely that this asymmetry will be most pronounced in languages with rigid word-order. A pre-registered study on 14 European languages (n=420) varying in word-order flexibility confirmed a rightward bias in drawings of interactions between two people (agent and recipient). This bias was weaker in more flexible languages, confirming that embodied and linguistic features of language interact in producing it.

Published
2021

11. Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

Author

Brandt, Mark J., Kuppens, Toon, Spears, Russell, Andrighetto, Luca, Autin, Frederique, Babincak, Peter, Badea, Constantina, Bae, Jaechang, Batruch, Anatolia, Becker, Julia C., Bocian, Konrad, Bodroža, Bojana, Bourguignon, David, Bukowski, Marcin, Butera, Fabrizio, Butler, Sarah E., Chryssochoou, Xenia, Conway, Paul, Crawford, Jarret T., Croizet, Jean Claude, de Lemus, Soledad, Degner, Juliane, Dragon, Piotr, Durante, Federica, Easterbrook, Matthew J., Essien, Iniobong, Forgas, Joseph P., González, Roberto, Graf, Sylvie, Halama, Peter, Han, Gyuseog, Hong, Ryan Y., Houdek, Petr, Igou, Eric R., Inbar, Yoel, Jetten, Jolanda, Jimenez Leal, William, Jiménez-Moya, Gloria, Karunagharan, Jaya Kumar, Kende, Anna, Korzh, Maria, Laham, Simon M., Lammers, Joris, Lim, Li, Manstead, Antony S.R., Međedović, Janko, Melton, Zachary J., Motyl, Matt, Ntani, Spyridoula, Owuamalam, Chuma Kevin, Peker, Müjde, Platow, Michael J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, Christine, Rubin, Mark, Saab, Rim, Sankaran, Sindhuja, Shepherd, Lee, Sibley, Chris G., Sobkow, Agata, Spruyt, Bram, Stroebaek, Pernille, Sümer, Nebi, Sweetman, Joseph, Teixeira, Catia P., Toma, Claudia, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, van der Toorn, Jojanneke, van Hiel, Alain, Vásquez-Echeverría, Alejandro, Vazquez, Alexandra, Vianello, Michelangelo, Vranka, Marek, Yzerbyt, Vincent, Zimmerman, Jennifer L., Leerstoel Ellemers, Social identity: Morality and diversity, Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research, ERC, Tilburg University [Netherlands], University of Groningen [Groningen], Universita degli studi di Genova, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage (CeRCA), Université de Poitiers-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of Presov, Université Paris Nanterre - UFR Sciences psychologiques et sciences de l'éducation (UPN SPSE), Université Paris Nanterre (UPN), Gwangju Welfare Foundation, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), University of Osnabrueck, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Partenaires INRAE, University of Novi Sad, Psychologie Ergonomique et Sociale pour l'Expérience utilisateurs (PErSEUs), Université de Lorraine (UL), Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie = Jagiellonian University (UJ), College of DuPage, Panteion University [Athens], The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO), Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of Granada [Granada], University of Hamburg, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca [Milano] (UNIMIB), University of Sussex, FernUniversität in Hagen, University of New South Wales [Sydney] (UNSW), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC), Czech Academy of Sciences [Prague] (CAS), Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Chonnam National University [Gwangju], National University of Singapore (NUS), University of Economics [Prague], University of Limerick (UL), University of Toronto, University of Queensland [Brisbane], Universidad de los Andes [Bogota] (UNIANDES), University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Ural State Law University, University of Melbourne, University of Cologne, Cardiff University, Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrade, Serbia, University of Illinois [Chicago] (UIC), University of Illinois System, MEF University [Istanbul], Australian National University (ANU), DePaul University [Chicago], University of Newcastle [Australia] (UoN), American University of Beirut [Beyrouth] (AUB), University of Warsaw (UW), University of Northumbria at Newcastle [United Kingdom], University of Auckland [Auckland], Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (KU), Sabanci University [Istanbul], University of Exeter, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Utrecht University [Utrecht], Leiden University, Universiteit Gent = Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), Universidad de la República [Montevideo] (UDELAR), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Universita degli Studi di Padova, Charles University [Prague] (CU), Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), Universidad de la República [Montevideo] (UCUR), UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Department of Social Psychology, Università degli studi di Genova = University of Genoa (UniGe), University of Prešov, Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne (UNIL), SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (SWPS), Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Universidad de Granada = University of Granada (UGR), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca = University of Milano-Bicocca (UNIMIB), Prague University of Economics and Business (VSE), University of Newcastle [Callaghan, Australia] (UoN), University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH), Universiteit Leiden, Universiteit Gent = Ghent University (UGENT), Università degli Studi di Padova = University of Padua (Unipd), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Tours-Université de Poitiers, Peker, Müjde, Sociology, Brussels Interdisciplinary Research centre on Migration and Minorities, Leerstoel Ellemers, Social identity: Morality and diversity, Social Psychology, Brandt, M, Kuppens, T, Spears, R, Andrighetto, L, Autin, F, Babincak, P, Badea, C, Bae, J, Batruch, A, Becker, J, Bocian, K, Bodroža, B, Bourguignon, D, Bukowski, M, Butera, F, Butler, S, Chryssochoou, X, Conway, P, Crawford, J, Croizet, J, de Lemus, S, Degner, J, Dragon, P, Durante, F, Easterbrook, M, Essien, I, Forgas, J, González, R, Graf, S, Halama, P, Han, G, Hong, R, Houdek, P, Igou, E, Inbar, Y, Jetten, J, Jimenez Leal, W, Jiménez‐moya, G, Kumar Karunagharan, J, Kende, A, Korzh, M, Laham, S, Lammers, J, Lim, L, Manstead, A, Međedović, J, Melton, Z, Motyl, M, Ntani, S, Kevin Owuamalam, C, Peker, M, Platow, M, Prims, J, Reyna, C, Rubin, M, Saab, R, Sankaran, S, Shepherd, L, Sibley, C, Sobkow, A, Spruyt, B, Stroebaek, P, Sümer, N, Sweetman, J, Teixeira, C, Toma, C, Ujhelyi, A, van der Toorn, J, van Hiel, A, Vásquez‐ Echeverría, A, Vazquez, A, Vianello, M, Vranka, M, Yzerbyt, V, and Zimmerman, J

Subjects
CONTROL, Social psychology (sociology), H Social Sciences (General), COMPENSATORY, STRATEGIES, Psychologie sociale, Social Psychology, media_common.quotation_subject, SELF-ESTEEM, L300, MODELS, POWER, Social Sciences, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, legitimacy, 050109 social psychology, UNCERTAINTY, 050105 experimental psychology, SYSTEM-JUSTIFICATION THEORY, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 10. No inequality, Social identity theory, Research Articles, Legitimacy, COMPENSATORY CONTROL, status, M-PSI/05 - PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE, media_common, social identity, system justification, HYPOTHESIS, STABILITY, Dynamique des groupes, 05 social sciences, Self-esteem, Social mobility, Moderation, C800, status, legitimacy, social identity, system justification, Psychology, System justification, INEQUALITY, Social psychology, Research Article, Social status
Abstract

The relationships between subjective status and perceived legitimacy are important for understanding the extent to which people with low status are complicit in their oppression. We use novel data from 66 samples and 30 countries (N = 12,788) and find that people with higher status see the social system as more legitimate than those with lower status, but there is variation across people and countries. The association between subjective status and perceived legitimacy was never negative at any levels of eight moderator variables, although the positive association was sometimes reduced. Although not always consistent with hypotheses, group identification, selfesteem, and beliefs in social mobility were all associated with perceived legitimacy among people who have low subjective status. These findings enrich our understanding of the relationship between social status and legitimacy., Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research 15110006, H2020 European Research Council 759320, Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies 15130009, Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) CONICYT FONDECYT 1161371, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness PSI2016-79971-P, Grant Agency of the Czech Republic 20-01214S, Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences RVO: 68081740

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Is Martin Luther King or Malcom X the More Acceptable Face of Protest? High-Status Groups' Reactions to Low- Status Groups' Collective Action: High status groups’ reactions to low status groups’ collective action

Author

Teixeira, Catia P., Spears, Russell, Yzerbyt, Vincent Y., and Social Psychology

Subjects
social inequality, NEEDS-BASED MODEL, IN-GROUP, normative and non-normative actions, RECONCILIATION, Support for collective action, EFFICACY, SELF, SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL, INTERGROUP CONTACT, Normative and nonnormative actions, SUPPORT, high-status groups, GROUP IDENTIFICATION, GROUP MEMBERS
Abstract

Work on collective action focuses mainly on the perspective of disadvantaged groups. However, the dynamics of social change cannot be fully understood without taking into account the reactions of the members of advantaged groups to collective action by low-status groups. In 10 experiments conducted in 4 different intergroup contexts (N = 1349), we examine advantaged groups support for normative versus non-normative collective action by disadvantaged groups. Experiments 1a to 1e show that normative collective action is perceived as more likely to improve the disadvantaged group's position and that non-normative collective action is perceived as more damaging to the advantaged group's social image. Also, these differences are due to differences in perceptions of actions violating norms of protest and perceptions of protesters as blaming the advantaged group for the inequality. Experiments 2a to 3 show that high compared with low identified members of advantaged groups distinguish more between types of collective action, showing a greater preference for the normative type. Both a mediational design and an experimental-causal-chain design (Experiments 3 and 4) show that support among high identifiers depends more on whether collective action damages the high-status group's social image than on whether it actually reduces inequality. Findings suggest that high-status groups' support for collective action is not only shaped by the perceived likelihood of change but also by its potential damage to the image of the high-status ingroup.

Published
2020

13. Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

Author

Leerstoel Ellemers, Social identity: Morality and diversity, Brandt, Mark J., Kuppens, Toon, Spears, Russell, Andrighetto, Luca, Autin, Frederique, Babincak, Peter, Badea, Constantina, Bae, Jaechang, Batruch, Anatolia, Becker, Julia C., Bocian, Konrad, Bodroža, Bojana, Bourguignon, David, Bukowski, Marcin, Butera, Fabrizio, Butler, Sarah E., Chryssochoou, Xenia, Conway, Paul, Crawford, Jarret T., Croizet, Jean Claude, de Lemus, Soledad, Degner, Juliane, Dragon, Piotr, Durante, Federica, Easterbrook, Matthew J., Essien, Iniobong, Forgas, Joseph P., González, Roberto, Graf, Sylvie, Halama, Peter, Han, Gyuseog, Hong, Ryan Y., Houdek, Petr, Igou, Eric R., Inbar, Yoel, Jetten, Jolanda, Jimenez Leal, William, Jiménez-Moya, Gloria, Karunagharan, Jaya Kumar, Kende, Anna, Korzh, Maria, Laham, Simon M., Lammers, Joris, Lim, Li, Manstead, Antony S.R., Međedović, Janko, Melton, Zachary J., Motyl, Matt, Ntani, Spyridoula, Owuamalam, Chuma Kevin, Peker, Müjde, Platow, Michael J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, Christine, Rubin, Mark, Saab, Rim, Sankaran, Sindhuja, Shepherd, Lee, Sibley, Chris G., Sobkow, Agata, Spruyt, Bram, Stroebaek, Pernille, Sümer, Nebi, Sweetman, Joseph, Teixeira, Catia P., Toma, Claudia, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, van der Toorn, Jojanneke, van Hiel, Alain, Vásquez-Echeverría, Alejandro, Vazquez, Alexandra, Vianello, Michelangelo, Vranka, Marek, Yzerbyt, Vincent, Zimmerman, Jennifer L., Leerstoel Ellemers, Social identity: Morality and diversity, Brandt, Mark J., Kuppens, Toon, Spears, Russell, Andrighetto, Luca, Autin, Frederique, Babincak, Peter, Badea, Constantina, Bae, Jaechang, Batruch, Anatolia, Becker, Julia C., Bocian, Konrad, Bodroža, Bojana, Bourguignon, David, Bukowski, Marcin, Butera, Fabrizio, Butler, Sarah E., Chryssochoou, Xenia, Conway, Paul, Crawford, Jarret T., Croizet, Jean Claude, de Lemus, Soledad, Degner, Juliane, Dragon, Piotr, Durante, Federica, Easterbrook, Matthew J., Essien, Iniobong, Forgas, Joseph P., González, Roberto, Graf, Sylvie, Halama, Peter, Han, Gyuseog, Hong, Ryan Y., Houdek, Petr, Igou, Eric R., Inbar, Yoel, Jetten, Jolanda, Jimenez Leal, William, Jiménez-Moya, Gloria, Karunagharan, Jaya Kumar, Kende, Anna, Korzh, Maria, Laham, Simon M., Lammers, Joris, Lim, Li, Manstead, Antony S.R., Međedović, Janko, Melton, Zachary J., Motyl, Matt, Ntani, Spyridoula, Owuamalam, Chuma Kevin, Peker, Müjde, Platow, Michael J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, Christine, Rubin, Mark, Saab, Rim, Sankaran, Sindhuja, Shepherd, Lee, Sibley, Chris G., Sobkow, Agata, Spruyt, Bram, Stroebaek, Pernille, Sümer, Nebi, Sweetman, Joseph, Teixeira, Catia P., Toma, Claudia, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, van der Toorn, Jojanneke, van Hiel, Alain, Vásquez-Echeverría, Alejandro, Vazquez, Alexandra, Vianello, Michelangelo, Vranka, Marek, Yzerbyt, Vincent, and Zimmerman, Jennifer L.

Published
2020

14. Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

Author

UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Brandt, Mark J., Kuppens, Toon, Spears, Russell, Andrighetto, Luca, Autin, Frederique, Babincak, Peter, Badea, Constantina, Bae, Jaechang, Batruch, Anatolia, Becker, Julia C., Bocian, Konrad, Bodroža, Bojana, Bourguignon, David, Bukowski, Marcin, Butera, Fabrizio, Butler, Sarah E., Chryssochoou, Xenia, Conway, Paul, Crawford, Jarret T., Croizet, Jean‐Claude, Lemus, Soledad, Degner, Juliane, Dragon, Piotr, Durante, Federica, Easterbrook, Matthew J., Essien, Iniobong, Forgas, Joseph P., González, Roberto, Graf, Sylvie, Halama, Peter, Han, Gyuseog, Hong, Ryan Y, Houdek, Petr, Igou, Eric R., Inbar, Yoel, Jetten, Jolanda, Jimenez Leal, William, Jiménez‐Moya, Gloria, Karunagharan, Jaya Kumar, Kende, Anna, Korzh, Maria, Laham, Simon M., Lammers, Joris, Lim, Li, Manstead, Antony S. R., Međedović, Janko, Melton, Zachary J., Motyl, Matt, Ntani, Spyridoula, Owuamalam, Chuma Kevin, Peker, Müjde, Platow, Michael J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, Christine, Rubin, Mark, Saab, Rim, Sankaran, Sindhuja, Shepherd, Lee, Sibley, Chris G., Sobkow, Agata, Spruyt, Bram, Stroebaek, Pernille, Sümer, Nebi, Sweetman, Joseph, Teixeira, Catia P., Toma, Claudia, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, Toorn, Jojanneke, Hiel, Alain, Vásquez‐Echeverría, Alejandro, Vazquez, Alexandra, Vianello, Michelangelo, Vranka, Marek, Yzerbyt, Vincent, Zimmerman, Jennifer L., UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Brandt, Mark J., Kuppens, Toon, Spears, Russell, Andrighetto, Luca, Autin, Frederique, Babincak, Peter, Badea, Constantina, Bae, Jaechang, Batruch, Anatolia, Becker, Julia C., Bocian, Konrad, Bodroža, Bojana, Bourguignon, David, Bukowski, Marcin, Butera, Fabrizio, Butler, Sarah E., Chryssochoou, Xenia, Conway, Paul, Crawford, Jarret T., Croizet, Jean‐Claude, Lemus, Soledad, Degner, Juliane, Dragon, Piotr, Durante, Federica, Easterbrook, Matthew J., Essien, Iniobong, Forgas, Joseph P., González, Roberto, Graf, Sylvie, Halama, Peter, Han, Gyuseog, Hong, Ryan Y, Houdek, Petr, Igou, Eric R., Inbar, Yoel, Jetten, Jolanda, Jimenez Leal, William, Jiménez‐Moya, Gloria, Karunagharan, Jaya Kumar, Kende, Anna, Korzh, Maria, Laham, Simon M., Lammers, Joris, Lim, Li, Manstead, Antony S. R., Međedović, Janko, Melton, Zachary J., Motyl, Matt, Ntani, Spyridoula, Owuamalam, Chuma Kevin, Peker, Müjde, Platow, Michael J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, Christine, Rubin, Mark, Saab, Rim, Sankaran, Sindhuja, Shepherd, Lee, Sibley, Chris G., Sobkow, Agata, Spruyt, Bram, Stroebaek, Pernille, Sümer, Nebi, Sweetman, Joseph, Teixeira, Catia P., Toma, Claudia, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, Toorn, Jojanneke, Hiel, Alain, Vásquez‐Echeverría, Alejandro, Vazquez, Alexandra, Vianello, Michelangelo, Vranka, Marek, Yzerbyt, Vincent, and Zimmerman, Jennifer L.

Abstract

The relationships between subjective status and perceived legitimacy are important for understanding the extent to which people with low status are complicit in their oppression. We use novel data from 66 samples and 30 countries (N = 12,788) and find that people with higher status see the social system as more legitimate than those with lower status, but there is variation across people and countries. The association between subjective status and perceived legitimacy was never negative at any levels of eight moderator variables, although the positive association was sometimes reduced. Although not always consistent with hypotheses, group identification, self-esteem, and beliefs in social mobility were all associated with perceived legitimacy among people who have low subjective status. These findings enrich our understanding of the relationship between social status and legitimacy. © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Published
2020

15. Spatial agency bias and word order flexibility: A comparison of 14 European languages

Author

Suitner, Caterina, primary, Maass, Anne, additional, Navarrete, Eduardo, additional, Formanowicz, Magdalena, additional, Bratanova, Boyka, additional, Cervone, Carmen, additional, Hakoköngäs, Juho Eemeli, additional, Kuppens, Toon, additional, Lipourli, Eleni, additional, Rakić, Tamara, additional, Scatolon, Andrea, additional, Teixeira, Catia P., additional, Wang, Zhenlan, additional, Sobral, Maria Pedro, additional, and Carrier, Antonin, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Emotions in context: Anger causes ethnic bias but not gender bias in men but not women

Author

Kuppens, Toon, Pollet, Thomas V, Teixeira, Catia P, Demoulin, Stephanie, Roberts, S Craig, Little, Anthony, and Social Psychology

Subjects
INFORMATION, PREJUDICE, IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST, MOOD, THREAT, INTERGROUP BIAS, COMPETITION, MALE-WARRIOR HYPOTHESIS, STEREOTYPIC THINKING, JUDGMENT, health care economics and organizations, humanities
Abstract

Emotions influence information processing because they are assumed to carry valuable information. We predict that induced anger will increase ethnic but not gender intergroup bias because anger is related to conflicts for resources, and ethnic groups typically compete for resources, whereas gender groups typically engage in relations of positive interdependence. Furthermore, we also predict that this increased ethnic intergroup bias should only be observed among men because men show more group-based reactions to intergroup conflict than women do. Two studies, with 65 and 120 participants, respectively, indeed show that anger induction increases ethnic but not gender intergroup bias and only for men. Intergroup bias was measured with an implicit measure. In Study 2, we additionally predict (and find) that fear induction does not change ethnic or gender intergroup bias because intergroup bias is a psychological preparation for collective action and fear is not associated with taking action against out-groups. We conclude that the effect of anger depends on its specific informational potential in a particular intergroup context. These results highlight that gender groups differ on a crucial point from ethnic groups and call for more attention to the effect of people's gender in intergroup relations research. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Published
2012

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results