Search

Background: The pediatric emergency department is a high-value site for screening and resource referral for health-related social needs. However, best practices for this unique environment remain unclear. This study's objective was to introduce a consensus-based social care training toolkit for the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) setting., Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi study to establish consensus on social care practice and develop a user-friendly toolkit. Initially, five priority areas (sections) were identified. Participants reviewed literature and shared their expertise to draft preliminary sections of the toolkit. Two rounds of the modified Delphi process were conducted, involving a ranking system, significant qualitative feedback, and a final approval stage, resulting in the finalized toolkit., Results: Seventeen participants were included in the Delphi process, including pediatric and general EM faculty and trainees, as well as a social worker and public health professor. Forty-two content items were ranked in the first Delphi round. Based on a combination of score cut-off and extensiveness of qualitative comments, items were either minorly edited and kept (29%) or sent back to their section for review (71%). The second Delphi round integrated further suggested edits, and all participants in this final round approved the publicly available version of the toolkit., Conclusion: By utilizing diverse sources of information and a consensus-driven process of the modified Delphi, we generated best practice recommendations for the design, implementation, and training of social care programs in the PEM setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Natalie Tedford’s institution has received grant funding from the American Academy of Pediatrics Community Access to Child Health Program for investigator-initiated research and from the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health for investigator-collaborative research. This is not related to this study. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines recommend that febrile infants at low risk for invasive bacterial infection be discharged from the emergency department (ED) if primary care provider (PCP) follow-up occurs within 24 hours. We aimed to (1) assess the association between having electronic health record (EHR) documentation of a PCP and ED disposition and (2) describe documentation of potential barriers to discharge and plans for post-discharge follow-up in low-risk febrile infants., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter, cross-sectional study of low-risk febrile infants. Descriptive statistics characterized ED disposition on the basis of the day of the visit, EHR documentation of PCP, scheduled or recommended PCP follow-up, and barriers to discharge., Results: Most infants (3565/4042, 90.5%) had EHR documentation of a PCP. Compared with discharged infants, a similar proportion of hospitalized infants had EHR documentation of PCP (90.3% vs 91.2%, P = .47). Few infants (1.5%) had barriers to discharge documented. Of the 3360 infants (83.1%) discharged from the ED, 1544 (46.0%) had documentation of scheduled or recommended 24-hour PCP follow-up. Discharged infants with weekday visits were more likely than those with weekend visits to have documentation of scheduled or recommended 24-hour follow-up (50.0% vs 35.5%, P < .001)., Conclusions: Most infants had a documented PCP, yet fewer than half had documentation of a scheduled or recommended 24-hour follow-up. A dedicated focus on determining post-ED care plans that are safe and patient-centered may improve the quality of care for this population., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Competing Interests: Cannon Nelson and Tala Mujahed declare they have no conflicts of interest. Natalie J. Tedford's institution has received grant funding from the American Academy of Pediatrics Community Access to Child Health Program for investigator‐initiated research and from the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health for investigator‐collaborative research.

Importance: Febrile infants at low risk of invasive bacterial infections are unlikely to benefit from lumbar puncture, antibiotics, or hospitalization, yet these are commonly performed. It is not known if there are differences in management by race, ethnicity, or language., Objective: To investigate associations between race, ethnicity, and language and additional interventions (lumbar puncture, empirical antibiotics, and hospitalization) in well-appearing febrile infants at low risk of invasive bacterial infection., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter retrospective cross-sectional analysis of infants receiving emergency department care between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to July 2023. Pediatric emergency departments were determined through the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee. Well-appearing febrile infants aged 29 to 60 days at low risk of invasive bacterial infection based on blood and urine testing were included. Data were available for 9847 infants, and 4042 were included following exclusions for ill appearance, medical history, and diagnosis of a focal infectious source., Exposures: Infant race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, and other race or ethnicity) and language used for medical care (English and language other than English)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was receipt of at least 1 of lumbar puncture, empirical antibiotics, or hospitalization. We performed bivariate and multivariable logistic regression with sum contrasts for comparisons. Individual components were assessed as secondary outcomes., Results: Across 34 sites, 4042 infants (median [IQR] age, 45 [38-53] days; 1561 [44.4% of the 3516 without missing sex] female; 612 [15.1%] non-Hispanic Black, 1054 [26.1%] Hispanic, 1741 [43.1%] non-Hispanic White, and 352 [9.1%] other race or ethnicity; 3555 [88.0%] English and 463 [12.0%] language other than English) met inclusion criteria. The primary outcome occurred in 969 infants (24%). Race and ethnicity were not associated with the primary composite outcome. Compared to the grand mean, infants of families that use a language other than English had higher odds of the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]; 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). In secondary analyses, Hispanic infants, compared to the grand mean, had lower odds of hospital admission (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.93). Compared to the grand mean, infants of families that use a language other than English had higher odds of hospital admission (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.08-1.46)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among low-risk febrile infants, language used for medical care was associated with the use of at least 1 nonindicated intervention, but race and ethnicity were not. Secondary analyses highlight the complex intersectionality of race, ethnicity, language, and health inequity. As inequitable care may be influenced by communication barriers, new guidelines that emphasize patient-centered communication may create disparities if not implemented with specific attention to equity.

To examine the clinical outcomes of topical lidocaine exposures in pediatric patients reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS). We performed a retrospective review of the NPDS in pediatric patients with topical lidocaine toxicity from 2000 to 2020. Specific data analyzed were age, exposure chronicity, medical outcome, clinical effects, treatments, and disposition. Narrative case records were requested from poison centers. Of 37 cases identified, mean age was 5 years with age distribution of 1- to 0 days (n = 8), 1 to 24 months (n = 11), and 2-18 years (n = 18). Exposure chronicity was acute in 33 (89.2%) or chronic in 4 (10.8%). Moderate effects were seen in 25 (67.6%), major effects in 10 (27%), and 2 deaths (5.4%). The most common clinical effects included cyanosis (29.7%), seizures (18.9%), central nervous systems (CNS) depression (13.5%), drowsiness/lethargy (13.5%), and tachycardia (10.8%). The most common treatments were dilution/irrigation (35.1%), intravenous (IV) fluids (29.7%), oxygen (29.7%), methylene blue (27%), benzodiazepines (13.5%), and intubation (10.8%). Non-intensive care unit (ICU) disposition occurred for 23 patients (62.2%) and ICU admission for 14 (37.8%). Case details were requested for 37 cases, 16 cases (43.2%) were provided. Of the 2 deaths, 1 had significant cardiac history. The most common use of topical lidocaine was at home prior to a dermatologic procedure (37.5%). Topical lidocaine can induce serious outcomes resulting in ICU level care or death; however, moderate/major effects were well tolerated without comorbidities. Most patients discharged home. Given frequent use of topical, especially in outpatient settings, greater vigilance should be taken with prescriptions, instructions for use, and anticipatory guidance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of unmet social needs (USN) in a pediatric emergency department (PED) patient population and examine disparities in USN by self-selected language and patient demographics., Methods: We surveyed a convenience sample of English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of patients <18-years-old presenting to a free-standing children's hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah. In the caregiver's self-selected language, the pediatric version of the Screener for Intensifying Community Referrals for Health (p-SINCERE) assessed patient demographics and 10 areas of social needs. The primary outcome was presence of USN. Descriptive statistics compared 1) self-selected languages and 2) absence versus presence of USN. Patient and caregiver-level risk factors associated with USN were identified using multivariable logistic regression., Results: Of the 10,156 patients seen in our PED from 04/01/2021 to 08/03/2021, there were 9922 eligible, 5357 approached, and 3987 enrolled caregivers. Of the 3987 caregivers enrolled, self-selected language was English for 3662 (91.8%) and Spanish for 325 (8.2%). There were 1680 enrolled caregivers with ≥1 USN, representing 39.7% of English-speaking and 70.2% of Spanish-speaking caregivers (P < .001). The odds of having ≥1 USN was more than 2 times higher in Spanish-speakers than in English-speakers after adjustment., Conclusions: USN are common for families presenting for care to a PED, especially among Spanish-speaking caregivers. Furthermore, this study demonstrates disparities in limited English proficiency, race and ethnicity, and child insurance status. These findings support the practicality of utilizing the PED as an access point to initiate social need screening and referrals to address social determinants of health and health disparities., (Copyright © 2022 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia of unclear etiology. We present a unique case of an 8-year-old girl with chronic ITP who was subsequently diagnosed with T-lymphoblastic lymphoma at age 11. The clinical course was complicated by the occurrence of nonepileptiform events with bizarre behavior changes following the administration of nelarabine and intrathecal and high-dose systemic methotrexate. This case highlights an unusual co-occurrence of hematologic malignancy and chronic ITP in an otherwise healthy child. We speculate that underlying genetic or immunologic lesions may predispose a subset of pediatric ITP patients to the development of hematologic malignancies., Competing Interests: None of the authors have financial relationships or conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript to disclose., (Copyright © 2019 Ryan A. Denu et al.)