Search

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Despite the excellent clinical outcomes from brachytherapy treatments compared with other modalities and the low associated costs, there have been reports of a decline in utilization of brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate in detail the trend in utilization of brachytherapy in the province of Quebec, Canada, from 2011 to 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS All radiotherapy clinics in the province of Quebec, and among these the clinics that provide brachytherapy treatments, were identified. This observational retrospective cohort study involved analysis of data compiled by the Ministere de la Sante et des Services Sociaux du Quebec for the period of 2011 to end of 2019 on all brachytherapy procedures performed in the province of Quebec. Time series graphs were used to describe the number of high dose rate (HDR) and low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy treatments during the studied time period. Statistical analysis was conducted using R statistical software. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2019, 12 hospitals in the province of Quebec provided radiotherapy treatments, and all of them offered brachytherapy services. The median annual number of brachytherapy sessions was 4413 (range 3930-4829). HDR brachytherapy represented over 90% of all brachytherapy treatments throughout the study period. Significant changes over time were observed in the number of treatments: at least 5% change was seen only for the two most common subtypes of brachytherapy, HDR interstitial and HDR intracavitary, with an increase of 9.6% and a decrease of 9.2%, respectively. The use of other subtypes of brachytherapy (HDR-plesiotherapy, LDR-interstitial, LDR-intracavitary, LDR-eye plaque) was stable between 2011 and 2019, with ≤ 2.5% variation. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates an overall steady use of brachytherapy between 2011 and 2019 in Quebec. Brachytherapy offers numerous advantages for the treatment of diverse cancer sites. Although more sophisticated external beam radiotherapy treatments have emerged in the last decades, the precision and cost-effectiveness of brachytherapy remain unbeaten. To ensure the continued use and availability of brachytherapy, governments must put in place policies and regulations to that effect. Training and exposure of future health care professionals to brachytherapy within Quebec and Canada is essential to provide all patients the same access to this life saving modality.

Background Randomized studies have shown low compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy and external beam radiation (CT/EBRT) with total mesorectal excision. We hypothesize that giving neoadjuvant CT before local treatment would improve CT compliance. Methods Between 2010–2017, 180 patients were randomized (2:1) to either Arm A (AA) with FOLFOX x6 cycles prior to high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and surgery plus adjuvant FOLFOX x6 cycles, or Arm B (AB), with neoadjuvant HDRBT with surgery and adjuvant FOLFOX x12 cycles. The primary endpoint was CT compliance to ≥85% of full-dose CT for the first six cycles. Secondary endpoints were ypT0N0, five-year disease free survival (DFS), local control and overall survival (OS). Results Patients were randomized to either AA (n = 120, median age (MA) 62 years) or AB (n = 60, MA 63 years). 175/180 patients completed HDRBT as planned (97.2%). In AA, two patients expired during CT; three patients post-randomization received short course EBRT because of progression under CT (n = 2, AA) or personal preference (n = 1, AB). ypT0N0 was 31% in AA and 28% in AB (p = 0.7). CT Compliance was 80% in AA and 53% in AB (p = 0.0002). Acute G3/G4 toxicity was 35.8% in AA and 27.6% in AB (p = 0.23). With a median follow-up of 48.5 months (IQR 33–72), the five-year DFS was 72.3% with AA and 68.3% with AB (p = 0.74), the five-year OS 83.8% for AA and 82.2% for AB (p = 0.53), and the five-year local recurrence was 6.3% for AA and 5.8% for AB (p = 0.71). Conclusion We confirmed improved compliance to neoadjuvant CT in this study. Although there is no statistical difference in ypT0N0 rate, local recurrence, and DFS between the two arms, a trend towards favourable oncological outcomes is observed.

Background: Older cancer patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease may benefit from chemotherapy alone or combined with radiotherapy. However, chemotherapy is often omitted either because of physician bias or because of its underlying comorbidity, thus compromising their survival. The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic is compounding this issue because of the fear of immunosuppression induced by chemotherapy on the elderly which makes them more vulnerable to the virus. Summary: Immunotherapy has less effect on the patient bone marrow compared to chemotherapy. The potential synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy may improve local control and survival for older patients with selected cancer. Preliminary data are encouraging because of better survival and local control in diseases which are traditionally resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy such as melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Key Message: We propose a new paradigm combining immunotherapy at a reduced dose and/or extended dosing intervals and hypofractionated radiotherapy for older patients with selected cancer which needs to be tested in future clinical trials.

Rectal adenocarcinoma is a quite radioresistant tumor. In order to achieve non-operative management (NOM) radiotherapy plays a major role. Targeted radiotherapy aiming at high precision 3D radiotherapy uses stereotactic image-guided external beam radiotherapy machines. To further safely increase the tumor dose, endocavitary brachytherapy (ECB) is an original approach. There are two different ways to perform such an ECB: contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) using a 50 kV X-ray generator with an X-ray tube positioned under eye guidance into the rectal cavity and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) using iridium-192 sources positioned into the rectal cavity under image guidance. This study focused on CXB. CXB uses a small mobile generator that produces 50 kV X-rays with limited penetration. This technique is well adapted to accessible tumors of limited size and especially needs a high dose rate (≥15 Gy/minutes) for rectal tumors. It is performed on an ambulatory basis. A total dose between 80–110 Gy is delivered in 3–4 fractions over 3 to 6 weeks into a small volume (5 cm3). CXB was pioneered in the 1970s by Papillon using the Philips RT 50TM. Since 2009, the Papillon P50TM has been used in 11 institutions in Europe. The OPERA Phase III trial tested the hypothesis that a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) compared to an EBRT boost (9 Gy/5 fr) for T2–T3 ab < 5 cm and N0–N1 < 8 mm will increase the 3-year organ preservation (OP) rate when combined with 45 Gy/5 weeks with concomitant capecitabine. Out of more than 300 patients with tumors < 3 cm (1962–1992), Papillon reported a long-term local control close to 85%. Similar results were published in Europe and USA at that time. The Lyon R96-2 Phase III trial (2004) demonstrated that, when combined with preoperative EBRT, a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) significantly increased the rate of clinical complete response (cCR) and sphincter preservation, with some patients having OP at 10 years. With more than 2000 patients treated in Europe (2010–2020) using the Papillon 50TM, organ preservation appears possible in close to 80% of cases in selected early T2–T3. The OPERA trial closed after 141 inclusions (2015–2020) after an independent data monitoring committee recommendation because of promising results. At the 2-year follow-up (blinded data), the rate of cCR and OP were 77% and 72%, respectively, for the 141 tumors, and for T < 3 cm (61 pts), they were 86% and 85%, respectively, with good bowel function. The final results should be available in 2022. Organ preservation using NOM appears to be a promising approach for rectal cancer. A CXB boost with chemoradiotherapy in selected early T2–T3 could become an attractive option to achieve a planned OP. This approach should be proposed to well-informed patients after discussion in an MDT.

Background: Coronavirus disease 19 carry a high mortality rate among older patients and minorities such as ethnic Africans and Latinos through the induction of a cytokines storm. Many pharmacologic interventions were proposed to improve the mortality rate from normal organ damage such as pneumonia. Low dose whole lung radiotherapy has been used in the past to treat pneumonia and may improve survival through modulation of the inflammatory cytokines. However, there is a lot of controversy about the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality. Thus, a review of the clinical studies using irradiation for COVID-19 pneumonia is needed to answer those questions Methods: A literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted. Reported studies were analyzed to assess safety, efficacy, and inflammatory biomarkers response following low dose whole lung radiotherapy Results: Patients who required artificial ventilation for COVID-19 did not benefit from low dose whole lung radiotherapy, most likely due to severe lung damage. The inflammatory response may be attenuated after irradiation but it is unclear whether it is independent of the steroid effect. Conclusion: Randomized studies are required to assess the effect low dose whole lung radiotherapy for COVID-19 pneumonia and its anti-inflammatory property. Such studies are needed for emerging countries with limited resources as radiotherapy may be cost-effective to reduce hospital admission and intensive care unit monitoring.

(1) Background: The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has led to improvement in local recurrence (LR) outcomes. Furthermore, the addition of preoperative external beam radiotherapy to TME reduces LR to less than 6%. As a trade-off to these gradual improvements in local therapies, the oncology community’s work is now focusing on mitigating treatment-related toxicities. In other words, if a small proportion of 4–6% of rectal cancer patients benefit from additional local therapy beyond TME, the burden of acute and long-term side effects must be considered with care. (2) Methods: With the introduction of better-quality imaging for tumor visualization and treatment planning, a new conformed radiation treatment was introduced with high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy. The treatment concept was tested in phase I and II studies: first in the pre-operative setting, and then as a boost after external beam radiation therapy, as a dose-escalation study, to achieve higher local tumor control. (3) Results: HDREBT is safe and effective in achieving a high tumor regression rate and was well tolerated in a phase II multicenter and two matched-pair studies. (4) Conclusions: HDREBT is a conformed radiation therapy that is safe and effective, and is presently explored in a phase III dose-escalation study in the NOM of patients with operable rectal cancer.

IntroductionLate gastro-intestinal toxicities (LGIT) secondary to pelvic radiotherapy (RT) are well described in the literature. LGIT are mainly related to rectal or ano-rectal irradiation; however, involvement of the anal canal (AC) in the occurrence of LGIT remains poorly described and understood.Materials and MethodsThe aim of this work was to explore the potential role of the AC in the development of LGIT after prostate irradiation and identify predictive factors that could be optimized in order to limit these toxicities. This narrative literature review was realized using the Pubmed database. We identified original articles published between June 1997 and July 2019, relating to LGIT after RT for localized prostate cancer and for which AC was identified independently. Articles defining the AC as part of an anorectal or rectal volume only were excluded.ResultsA history of abdominal surgery or cardio-vascular risk, anticoagulant or tobacco use, and the occurrence of acute GIT during RT increases the risk of LGIT. A dose-effect relationship was identified between dose to the AC and development of LGIT. Identification and contouring of the AC and adjacent anatomical structures (muscles or nerves) are justified to apply specific dose constraints. As a limitation, our review mainly considered on 3DCRT which is no longer the standard of care nowadays; we did not identify any reports in the literature using moderately hypofractionated RT for the prostate and AC specific dosimetry.ConclusionThese results suggest that the AC may have an important role in the development of LGIT after pelvic RT for prostate cancer. The individualization of the AC during planning should be recommended in prospective studies.

Purpose To investigate differences between prescribed and postimplant calculated dose in 192Ir high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) by evaluating dose to clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) calculated with a Monte Carlo–based dose calculation software, RapidBrachyMC. In addition, dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity were compared among the radionuclides 192Ir, 75Se, and 169Yb for use in HDR-EBT. Methods and Materials Postimplant dosimetry was evaluated using 23 computed tomography (CT) images from patients treated with HDR-EBT using the 192Ir microSelectron v2 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) source and the Intracavitary Mold Applicator Set (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which is a flexible applicator capable of fitting a tungsten rod for OAR shielding. Four tissue segmentation schemes were evaluated: (1) TG-43 formalism, (2) materials and nominal densities assigned to contours of foreign objects, (3) materials and nominal densities assigned to contoured organs in addition to foreign objects, and (4) materials specified as in (3) but with voxel mass densities derived from CT Hounsfield units. Clinical plans optimized for 192Ir were used, with the results for 75Se and 169Yb normalized to the D90 of the 192Ir clinical plan. Results In comparison to segmentation scheme 4, TG-43–based dosimetry overestimates CTV D90 by 6% (P = .00003), rectum D50 by 24% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 by 5% (P = .00003) for 192Ir. For 169Yb, CTV D90 is overestimated by 17% (P = .00003) and rectum D50 by 39% (P = .00003), and pelvic bone D50 is significantly underestimated by 27% (P = .007). Postimplant dosimetry calculations also showed that a 169Yb source would give 20% (P = .00003) lower rectum V60 and 17% (P = .00008) lower rectum D50. Conclusions Ignoring high-Z materials in dose calculation contributes to inaccuracies that may lead to suboptimal dose optimization and disagreement between prescribed and calculated dose. This is especially important for low-energy radionuclides. Our results also show that with future magnetic resonance imaging–based treatment planning, loss of CT density data will only affect calculated dose in nonbone OARs by 2% or less and bone OARs by 13% or less across all sources if material composition and nominal mass densities are correctly assigned.

Purpose We describe methods to improve dose delivery for patients with rectal cancer receiving boost brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy. Methods and materials Patients with rectal cancer who were ineligible or refusing surgery are treated with external beam radiotherapy and subsequently with three weekly image-guided volume-adapted high-dose-rate brachytherapy boosts of 10 Gy to the residual clinical target volume, for a total of 30 Gy in three fractions. Tungsten shielding placed at the center of intracavitary mold applicator and double-balloon technique was used to improve dose conformity to the target. Results Our results show that the use of tungsten shield and double balloon reduces the dose gradient within the target volume to receive the prescription boost dose of 10 Gy from maximum dose of 60 Gy down to 20 Gy. Conclusions We outlined two methods for achieving higher high-dose-rate brachytherapy dose conformity using the tungsten shielding rods (to spare contralateral healthy tissues) and double-balloon technique (to decrease dose gradient within the target to minimize dose to the proximal mucosa).

Background: We explored image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy patients electing non-operative management for rectal cancer. We present the first pre-planned interim analysis. Methods: In this open-label phase II–III randomized study, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with 5-FU/Capecitabine. They were randomized 1:1 to receive either an EBRT boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm A) or three weekly adaptive brachytherapy (IGAEBT) boosts totaling 30 Gy (Arm B). Patient characteristics and toxicity are presented using descriptive analyses; TME-free survival between arms with the intention to treat the population is explored using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 40 patients were in this analysis. Baseline characteristics were balanced; acute toxicities were similar. Complete clinical response (cCR) was 50% (n = 10/20) in Arm A and 90% in Arm B (n = 18/20). Median follow-up was 1.3 years; 2-year TME-free survival was 38.6% (95% CI: 16.5–60.6%) in the EBRT arm and 76.6% (95% CI: 56.1–97.1%) in the IGAEBT arm. Conclusions: Radiation intensification with IGAEBT is feasible. This interim analysis suggests an improvement in TME-free survival when comparing IGAEBT with EBRT, pending confirmation upon completion of this trial.

BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) carry a high mortality rate among older patients and minorities such as ethnic Africans and Latinos. The chronic baseline systemic inflammation of older patients and minorities may make them more vulnerable to the cytokines storm generated by the viral infection in addition to preexisting co-morbidity. Even though multiple organs failure result from the cytokine storm, pneumonia and respiratory failure often lead to death. OBJECTIVE Low dose whole lung radiotherapy (LDWLRT) may modulate the inflammatory response and may decrease the need for artificial ventilation, thus improving mortality rate. METHODS A phase I-II prospective trials enrolling 500 patients, 65 years old or older from 25 countries will be conducted to investigate the impact of LDWLRT on mortality rate of COVID-19 patients. The patients who will be selected would have developed pneumonias but did not require artificial ventilation. These patients will be followed for a year after receiving this treatment. Their physical activities will be monitored through the ordinal scale and will be correlated with their cytokines status and oxygen saturation rate to assess the impact of the residual inflammation on their daily life. Mortality rates between different ethnic group will be compared and correlated with their cytokines response to the virus and number of co-morbidities. RESULTS We postulate that LDWLRT may improve survival rates of all patients by preventing the need for artificial ventilation which is associated with a high mortality. The inflammatory response between different ethnic groups before and following radiotherapy will be valuable to serve as baseline for future prospective pandemic studies as it has not been reported before. CONCLUSIONS Once the study is complete, we may be able to demonstrate that LDWLRT may improve survival through its anti-inflammatory property CLINICALTRIAL NCT 04493294

The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic is unprecedented as it reached all countries in the world within a record short period of time. Even though COVID-19 infection may be just severe in any adults, older adults (65-year-old or older) may experience a higher mortality rate. Among those affected, cancer patients may have a worse outcome compared to the general population because of their depressed immune status. As the health resources of most countries are limited, clinicians may face painful decisions about which patients to save if they require artificial ventilation. Cancer patients, especially the older ones, may be denied supportive care because of their shorter life expectancy. Thus, special considerations should be taken to prevent infection of older cancer patients and to provide them with adequate social support during their cancer treatment. The following proposal was reached: (1) Education of health care providers about the special needs of older cancer patients and their risks of infection. (2) Special consideration such as surgical masks and separate scheduling should be made to protect them from being infected. (3) Social services such as patient navigators should be provided to ensure adequate medical supply, food, and daily transportation to cancer centers. (4) Close monitoring through phone calls, telecommunication to ensure social distancing and psychological support from patient family to prevent anxiety and depression. (5) Shorter course of radiotherapy by use of hypofractionation where possible to decrease the needs for daily transportation and exposure to infection. (6) Enrollment of older cancer patients in clinical trials for potential antiviral medications if infection does occur. (7) Home health care telemedicine may be an effective strategy for older cancer patients with COVID-19 infection to avoid hospital admission when health care resources become restricted. (8) For selected patients, immunotherapy and targeted therapy may become the systemic therapy of choice for older cancer patients and need to be tested in clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant pelvic radiotherapy is widely used for patients with advanced rectal cancer. The trade-off between dose and response is well-established, yet little consensus remains on the precise methods of delivery and doses given in different scenarios. Professor Vuong reviews the evidence base and trial evidence on the escalation of radiotherapy dose and the methods of achieving this.

background: Pathological extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer, but can also be identified on MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI). We perform a meta-analysis to determine the risk of metastatic disease at presentation and after surgery in mrEMVI-positive patients compared with negative tumours. methods: Electronic databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2016. Conventional meta-analytical techniques were used to provide a summative outcome. Quality assessment of the studies was performed. results: Six articles reported on mrEMVI in 1262 patients. There were 403 patients in the mrEMVI-positive group and 859 patients in the mrEMVI-negative group. The combined prevalence of mrEMVI-positive tumours was 0.346(range=0.198–0.574). Patients with mrEMVI-positive tumours presented more frequently with metastases compared to mrEMVI-negative tumours (fixed effects model: odds ratio (OR)=5.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.75, 8.61), z=8.21, df=2, P

Purpose Several radionuclides with high (60Co, 75Se) and intermediate (169Yb, 153Gd) energies have been investigated as alternatives to 192Ir for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tissue heterogeneities for these five high- to intermediate-energy sources in prostate and head & neck brachytherapy. Methods and Materials Treatment plans were generated for a cohort of prostate (n = 10) and oral tongue (n = 10) patients. Dose calculations were performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS, an in-house Geant4-based Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Treatment plans were simulated using 60Co, 192Ir, 75Se, 169Yb, and 153Gd as the active core of the microSelectron v2 source. Two dose calculation scenarios were presented: (1) dose to water in water (Dw,w), and (2) dose to medium in medium (Dm,m). Results Dw,w overestimates planning target volume coverage compared with Dm,m, regardless of photon energy. The average planning target volume D90 reduction was ∼1% for high-energy sources, whereas larger differences were observed for intermediate-energy sources (1%–2% for prostate and 4%–7% for oral tongue). Dose differences were not clinically relevant ( Conclusions Dw,w underestimates the dose to bones and, to a lesser extent, overestimates the dose to soft tissues for radionuclides with average energies lower than 192Ir. Further studies regarding bone toxicities are needed before intermediate-energy sources can be adopted in cases where bones are in close vicinity to the tumor.

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is an uncommon yet rising cancer worldwide. Definitive chemo-radiation (CRT) remains the best curative treatment option for non-metastatic cases in terms of local control, recurrence-free and progression-free survival. Still, despite overall good results, with 80% five-year survival, a subgroup of ASCC patients displays a high level of locoregional and/or metastatic recurrence rates, up to 35%, and may benefit from a more aggressive strategy. Beyond initial staging, there is no reliable marker to predict recurrence following CRT. Imaging, mostly positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bears an important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of ASCC. The routine use of radiomics may enhance the quality of information derived from these modalities. It is thought that including data derived from radiomics into the input flow of machine learning algorithms may improve the prediction of recurrence. Although some studies have shown glimmers of hope, more data is needed before offering practitioners tools to identify high-risk patients and enable extensive clinical application, especially regarding the matters of imaging normalization, radiomics process standardization and access to larger patient databases with external validation in order to allow results extrapolation. The aim of this review is to present a critical overview from this data.

A cytokine storm induced by SARS-Cov2 may produce pneumonitis which may be fatal for older patients with underlying lung disease. Hyper-elevation of Interleukin1 (IL-1), Tumor necrosis factor-1alfa (TNF-1 alfa), and Interleukin 6 (IL-6) produced by inflammatory macrophage M1 may damage the lung alveoli leading to severe pneumonitis, decreased oxygenation, and potential death despite artificial ventilation. Older patients may not be suitable candidates for pharmaceutical intervention targeting IL-1/6 blockade or artificial ventilation. Low dose total lung (LDTL) irradiation at a single dose of 50 cGy may stop this cytokine cascade, thus preventing, and/or reversing normal organs damage. This therapy has been proven in the past to be effective against pneumonitis of diverse etiology and could be used to prevent death of older infected patients. Thus, LDRT radiotherapy may be a cost-effective treatment for this frail patient population whom radiation -induced malignancy is not a concern because of their advanced age. This hypothesis should be tested in future prospective trials.

Background Esophageal cancer treatment requires large radiation fields due to the deep location of the esophagus in the mediastinum and the high incidence of radial spread. There is no optimal radiation technique to ensure appropriate target coverage and minimal dose to all normal structures. Methods Fifteen consecutive cases of locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with radical chemoradiation (CRT) were analyzed. The total prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. A total of 60 plans were generated for analysis, including four different methods for each case. Method 1 consisted of a four-field conformal technique; method 2 was a two-plan technique (antero-posterior (AP), postero-anterior (PA), two posterior oblique fields (RPO and LPO)); method 3 was a three-field conformal technique (AP, LPO, RPO); and method 4 was a volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) technique. Dose ratios were calculated using the minimum, maximum, mean, and median doses of methods 2-4 over the dose of method 1. Ratios for the planning target volume (PTV) and to surrounding organs were analyzed. Results The mean PTV dose ratio ranged from 0.994 to 1.048 (SD = 0.01) representing an adequate target coverage for all techniques based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA). For the lungs, method 2 had the lowest lung V20 with a ratio of 0.861 (SD = 0.12), whereas method 3 had the highest with 1.644 (SD = 0.14). For the heart, method 3 had the lowest heart V40 with a mean dose ratio of 0.807 (SD = 0.09), whereas method 2 had the highest with 1.160 (SD = 0.11). For the liver, method 2 had the lowest V30 with a mean ratio of 0.857 (SD = 0.1) whereas method 4 had the highest with 1.672 (SD = 0.48). For the spinal cord, method 3 had the lowest mean dose ratio of 0.559 (SD = 0.09) whereas method 2 had the highest with 1.094 (SD = 0.04). Conclusion The four radiation techniques for esophageal cancer treatment were appropriate for target coverage. Method 2 had the most organ-sparing effect for the lungs and liver, and method 3 for the heart and spinal cord. VMAT did not add any significant sparing. A case-by-case decision should be made based on the patient’s comorbidities.

Clinical complete response (cCR) in rectal cancer is being evaluated as a tool to identify patients who would not require surgery in the curative management of rectal cancer. Our study reviews mucosal changes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer in patients treated at our center. Pathology reports were retrieved for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) or high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT). The macroscopic appearance of the specimen was compared with pathologic staging. This study included 282 patients: 88 patients underwent neoadjuvant CRT and 194 patients underwent HDRBT; all patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME). There were 160 male and 122 female patients with a median age of 65 years (range 29–87). The median time between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was 50 and 58 days. Sixty patients (21.2%) were staged as ypT0N0, 21.2% had a pathologic complete response (pCR), and only 3.2% had a cCR. Of the 67 patients with initial involvement of the circumferential radial margin (CRM), 44 converted to pathologic CRM−. Two hundred seventy-three patients (96.8%) had mucosal abnormalities. Of the 222 patients with residual tumor, 70 patients had no macroscopic tumor visualized but an ulcer in its place. Most patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer have residual mucosal abnormalities which preclude to a cCR as per published criteria from Brazil. Further studies are required to optimize clinical evaluation and MRI imaging in selected patients.

Aim High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) appears to be associated with less treatment-related toxicity compared with external beam radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. The present study compared the effect of preoperative treatment strategies on overall survival, cancer-specific deaths, and local recurrences between a Dutch and Canadian expert center with different preoperative treatment strategies. Patients and methods We included 145 Dutch and 141 Canadian patients with cT3, non-metastasized rectal cancer. All patients from Canada were preoperatively treated with HDRBT. The preoperative treatment strategy for Dutch patients consisted of either no preoperative treatment, short-course radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing overall survival. We adjusted for age, cN stage, (y)pT stage, comorbidity, and type of surgery. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were cancer-specific deaths and local recurrences. Results Five-year overall survival was 70.9% (95% CI 62.6%–77.7%) in Dutch patients compared with 86.9% (80.1%–91.6%) in Canadian patients, resulting in an adjusted HR of 0.70 (95% CI 0.39–1.26; p = 0.233). Of 145 Dutch patients, 6.9% (95% CI 2.8%–11.0%) had a local recurrence and 17.9% (95% CI 11.7%–24.2%) patients died of rectal cancer, compared with 4.3% (95% CI 0.9%–7.5%) local recurrences and 10.6% (95% CI 5.5%–15.7%) rectal cancer deaths out of 141 Canadian patients. Conclusion We did not detect statistically significant differences in overall survival between a Dutch and Canadian expert center with different treatment strategies. This finding needs to be further investigated in a randomized controlled trial.

High-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) is a novel treatment modality for patients with rectal cancer. It is based on modern tumor imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is used to choose eligible patients and improve tumor visualization. Treatment planning is performed using 3D CT simulation and 3D treatment planning. Treatments are delivered on an outpatient basis and require minimal local anesthesia. Validation of this technique was carried out through a preoperative study. In this chapter, we describe the technical aspects of HDREBT and the ongoing studies exploring the clinical applications of this treatment modality for patients with rectal cancer: As neoadjuvant treatment for patients with operable rectal tumor As a dose escalation modality following external beam radiation for elderly and medically inoperable patients As a modality to promote to sphincter preservation surgery (SPS) for patients with low-lying rectal cancer As an option to improve local control in patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer in the setting of previous pelvic radiation therapy

Purpose: We introduced the concept of Dynamic Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) for rectal cancer, last year. To continue our work, we studied different shield designs and investigated the system's tolerance against systematic setup errors. Methods: As previously presented, our system uses a cylindrical tungsten shield to create a directional radiation profile, which is modulated through translation and rotation using a specialized robotic arm. We used Monte Carlo simulations and an in‐house gradient projection optimization algorithm to look at key design parameters. First, we used ideal phantoms to study treatment quality from shield radii ranging 0.5–1.5 cm in 0.25 cm increments. Second, using 36 patient plans, the dependence on radial source position within the shield was studied. We also analyzed the tolerance of the system to systematic setup errors by simulating dose distributions from possible inaccuracies. These included translational and rotational errors as well as possible Ir‐192 source misplacements by the afterloading system. Results: Changes in shield radius followed steady patterns. Increasing the radius showed a consistent increase in dose conformality to the tumor volume and better sparing to surrounding tissues. However, there was also a linear increase in total dwell time. There was a trade off to changing the radial position of the source. As the source is brought away from the center, there is a decrease in conformality to the tumor volume, but sparing to healthy tissues was increased and there is a decrease in total dwell time. We found that any potential setup errors for our system, within anticipated margins, had negligible effects on the dose distributions (< 3% deviation). Conclusion: Various parameters for shield designs must be balanced for an effective DMBT application. It was found that the system is highly robust against systematic setup uncertainties.

Rectal cancers can be categorized into three clinical subgroups: early, intermediate, and those locally advanced. For the latter two cases, preoperative radiotherapy is recommended. An advanced type of cancer is diagnosed whenever a cT3 lesion threatens or invades mesorectal fascia or when a cT4 tumor overgrows into organs not readily resectable. For the intermediate-risk group, tumor shrinkage before surgery is not needed and preoperative radiotherapy is aimed at reducing the risk of local recurrence. There are two types of preoperative radiation treatment commonly accepted as standard for the intermediate risk group: (1) short-course (5 fractions of 5 Gy over 1 week) radiotherapy (RT) with surgery carried out within the next 5 days and (2) long-course chemoradiation (conventionally fractionated RT consisting of 25–28 fractions of 1.8 or 2 Gy over 5–5.5 weeks concomitantly used with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) with surgery carried out 6–8 weeks thereafter.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy The introduction of computed tomography simulation and computer-based treatment planning in radiotherapy provided improved definition of target and normal structures, and lead to the era of 3D conformal therapy. However, it was the modern generation of linear accelerators, equipped with dynamic multileaf collimators, that truly revolutionized radiotherapy. Multileaf collimators consist of multiple, individually motorized leaves that are driven by sophisticated computerized algorithms, moving them in and out of the beam’s path, thereby modulating the beam’s intensity. These technological advancements precipitated the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), enabling highly conformal radiation delivery with dose sculpting of target volumes and a rapid dose fall-off for the sparing of normal structures, or ‘organs at risk’ (OAR). Cumulative data on clinical tolerance and dose–effect correlations have allowed the definition of specific tolerance doses for OAR. Respecting these OAR dose limits while delivering the appropriate therapeutic dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) has been facilitated by the pairing of IMRT with image-guided radiotherapy, which allows for accurate tumor and OAR localization during radiotherapy planning and delivery. Ultimately, this has lead to an improvement in local tumor control in a variety of different tumor sites, while reducing the dose to OAR, thus diminishing radiation-related toxicity. IMRT has been particularly useful in the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer, whereby the sculpting of concave target doses permits dose restriction around the parotids. This has lead to parotid function preservation while achieving identical local disease control. Thus, patient quality of life has been improved by the decrease in xerostomia observed in conventional r adiation treatment [1]. Subsequently, IMRT was studied for pelvic tumors, starting with gynecologic malignancies. Dosimetric studies analyzing dose–volume histograms showed significant dose sparing for OAR, especially for the small bowel, bladder, rectum and bone marrow [2,3]. Subsequent clinical studies substantiated these predicted benefits, with lower reported gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity [4,5], pelvic girdle toxicity [6]

Pain and anxiety have been reported as primary concerns for patients with head-and-neck, gynecologic, and prostate cancers undergoing high dose rate (hdr) brachytherapy. However, almost no research has been published on the degree to which these symptoms are experienced by rectal cancer patients undergoing hdr brachytherapy. We conducted a pilot study examining the experiences of rectal cancer patients during hdr brachytherapy, specifically the intensity and trajectory of their anxiety and pain. Rectal cancer patients (n = 25) who received hdr brachytherapy treatment at a hospital in Montreal, Quebec, completed verbal analog scales for pain and anxiety at 4 time points over 4 treatment days. On all 4 days, a subset of patients reported moderate-to-severe anxiety before applicator insertion. Pain increased significantly from the time patients were lying on the table to immediately after insertion of the applicator (p < 0.001). Insertion of the applicator appears to be the most painful part of the procedure, and although anxiety declined to below baseline after applicator removal, pain remained somewhat elevated. Some patients required conscious sedation, however, reports of moderate-to-severe pain were more frequent from patients who received pain medications than from patients who did not receive such medication (p < 0.05). Most patients with rectal cancer tolerated hdr rectal brachytherapy well, although the procedure is stressful and painful for some. Insertion of the applicator was found to be the point of maximal pain, and medication was not always completely successful at alleviating the pain, suggesting that additional psychosocial interventions might be needed, with particular emphasis on the time of applicator insertion.

The management of older cancer patients remains difficult because of data paucity. Radiation oncologists need to identify potential issues which could affect treatment of those patients. A workshop was organized in Barcelona among international radiation oncologists with special interest in the management of older cancer patients on April 22, 2018. The following consensus was reached: 1. Older cancer patients often faced unconscious discriminating bias from cancer specialists and institutions because of their chronological age. 2. Advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed patients with multiple co-morbidities precluding surgery or systemic therapy to achieve potential cure in early disease stages. 3. The lack of biomarkers for frailty remains an impediment to future research. 4. Access to healthcare insurance and daily transportation remains an issue in many countries; 5. Hypofractionation, brachytherapy, or stereotactic techniques may be ideally suited for older cancer patients to minimize transportation issues and to improve tolerance to radiotherapy. 6. Patients with locally advanced disease who are mentally and physically fit should receive combined therapy for potential cure. 7. The role of systemic therapy alone or combined with radiotherapy for frail patients needs to be defined in future clinical trials because of targeted agents or immunotherapy may be less toxic compared to conventional chemotherapy.

Purpose During the last decade due to the availability of a CT scan in the brachytherapy suite, high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) has evolved as a CT-based daily adaptive treatment. An update of the technical and practical aspects of HDREBT is provided. Methods and Materials Description of technical and practical aspects of HDREBT focused on the preoperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. During preoperative HDREBT, 26 Gy is delivered in four daily applications of 6.5 Gy prescribed to the 100% isodose, covering the clinical target volume. Daily CT scans are obtained and used for plan optimization, leaving patient positioning unchanged between CT scan and treatment delivery. Results All steps of HDREBT treatment procedure are discussed in detail: flexible proctosigmoidoscopy and clipping; patient setup; applicator placement; target delineation; treatment planning and delivery; and patient care. Afterward, treatment results are reviewed. Conclusions CT-based adaptive preoperative HDREBT is a practical and feasible therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, offering excellent local control with a favorable toxicity profile.

Radiotherapy has been driven by constant technological advances since the discovery of X-rays in 1895. Radiotherapy aims to sculpt the optimal isodose on the tumour volume while sparing normal tissues. The benefits are threefold: patient cure, organ preservation and cost-efficiency. The efficacy and tolerance of radiotherapy were demonstrated by randomized trials in many different types of cancer (including breast, prostate and rectum) with a high level of scientific evidence. Such achievements, of major importance for the quality of life of patients, have been fostered during the past decade by linear accelerators with computer-assisted technology. More recently, these developments were augmented by proton and particle beam radiotherapy, usually combined with surgery and medical treatment in a multidisciplinary and personalized strategy against cancer. This article reviews the timeline of 100 years of radiotherapy with a focus on breakthroughs in the physics of radiotherapy and technology during the past two decades, and the associated clinical benefits.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate in local staging of rectal cancer. It can identify features known to be associated with increased risk of metastatic disease. We evaluated the incidence of synchronous metastatic disease on fludeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and contrast-enhanced multiple-row detector computed tomography (ceMDCT) in MRI-stratified high- and low-risk rectal cancers. The aim was to determine the incidence of synchronous metastatic disease according to MRI risk features. A total of 236 patients with rectal cancer were recruited to a study evaluating FDG-PET/CT. All patients underwent MRI staging and were stratified into high and low risk (high risk: extramural venous invasion, extramural spread of >5 mm or T4, involved circumferential resection margin or intersphincteric plane involved for low rectal tumors). Confirmed metastases were those identified on FDG-PET/CT and ceMDCT. Imaging data were available for 230 (97.5%) of 236 patients. Incidence of confirmed distant metastases was significantly greater in the MRI high-risk group, with 28 (20.7%) of 135 (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.8–28.3), versus the low-risk group, with 4 (4.2%) of 95 (95% CI 1.7–10.3) (odds ratio 6.0, 95% CI 2.0–17.6, P