Search

Your search keyword '"Taylor, Stephanie J. C."' showing total 386 results
Start Over Author "Taylor, Stephanie J. C."
386 results on '"Taylor, Stephanie J. C."'

4. Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of comparing enhanced acceptance and commitment therapy plus (+) added to usual aftercare versus usual aftercare only, in patients living with or beyond cancer: SUrvivors’ Rehabilitation Evaluation after CANcer (SURECAN) trial

Author

Khan, Imran, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Robinson, Clare, Moschopoulou, Elisavet, McCrone, Paul, Bourke, Liam, Thaha, Mohamed, Bhui, Kamaldeep, Rosario, Derek, Ridge, Damien, Donovan, Sheila, Korszun, Ania, Little, Paul, Morgan, Adrienne, Quentin, Olivier, Roylance, Rebecca, White, Peter, and Chalder, Trudie

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. The IMPROVE trial: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of using lay health workers to improve uptake and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Author

Gilworth, Gill, Harris, Katherine, Morgan, Toby L., Ayis, Salma, Fox-Rushby, Julia, Godfrey, Emma, Hopkinson, Nicholas S., Lewin, Simon, Lim, Ka Keat, Spinou, Arietta, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., and White, Patrick

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP2ART) in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled implementation trial

Author

McClatchey, Kirstie, Hammersley, Vicky, Steed, Liz, Sheringham, Jessica, Marsh, Viv, Barat, Atena, Delaney, Brigitte, Hamborg, Thomas, Fitzsimmons, Deborah, Holmes, Steve, Jackson, Tracy, Ehrlich, Elisabeth, Morgan, Noelle, Saxon, Ann, Preston, Megan, Price, David, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., and Pinnock, Hilary

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Prioritising primary care respiratory research needs: results from the 2020 International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) global e-Delphi exercise

Author

Abdel-Aal, Arwa, Lisspers, Karin, Williams, Siân, Adab, Peymané, Adams, Rachel, Agarwal, Dhiraj, Barnard, Amanda, Bouloukaki, Izolde, van Boven, Job F. M., Chavannes, Niels, Dickens, Andrew P., van Gemert, Frederik, Escarrer, Mercedes, Haroon, Shamil, Kayongo, Alex, Kirenga, Bruce, Kocks, Janwillem W. H., Kotz, Daniel, Newby, Chris, McNulty, Cliodna, Metting, Esther, Moral, Luis, Papadakis, Sophia, Pinnock, Hilary, Price, David, Ryan, Dermot, Singh, Sally J., Correia de Sousa, Jaime, Ställberg, Björn, Szefler, Stanley J., Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Tsiligianni, Ioanna, Turner, Alice, Weller, David, Yusuf, Osman, Tabyshova, Aizhamal K., and Jordan, Rachel E.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. Supported online self-management versus care as usual for symptoms of fatigue, pain and urgency/incontinence in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD-BOOST): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Author

Norton, Christine, Syred, Jonathan, Kerry, Sally, Artom, Micol, Sweeney, Louise, Hart, Ailsa, Czuber-Dochan, Wladyslawa, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Mihaylova, Borislava, Roukas, Chris, Aziz, Qasim, Miller, Laura, Pollok, Richard, Saxena, Sonia, Stagg, Imogen, Terry, Helen, Zenasni, Zohra, Dibley, Lesley, and Moss-Morris, Rona

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Development of theoretically informed audit and feedback: An exemplar from a complex implementation strategy to improve asthma self‐management in UK primary care.

Author

McClatchey, Kirstie, Sheldon, Aimee, Steed, Liz, Sheringham, Jessica, Holmes, Steve, Preston, Megan, Appiagyei, Francis, Price, David, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., and Pinnock, Hilary

Subjects
ASTHMA treatment, AUDITING, PROFESSIONAL practice, FAMILY medicine, EVIDENCE-based medicine, PRIMARY health care, HUMAN services programs, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, RESEARCH funding, HEALTH self-care, MEDICAL societies
Abstract

Rationale: Audit and feedback is an evidence‐based implementation strategy, but studies reporting the use of theory to guide design elements are limited. Aims and Objectives: Within the context of a programme of research aiming to improve the implementation of supported asthma self‐management in UK primary care (IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self‐management as RouTine [IMP2ART]), we aimed to design and develop theoretically‐informed audit and feedback that highlighted supported asthma self‐management provision and areas for improvement in primary care general practices. Method: Aligned with the Medical Research Council (MRC) complex intervention framework, the audit and feedback was developed in three phases: (1) Development: literature and theory exploration, and prototype audit and feedback design; (2) Feasibility: eliciting feedback on the audit and feedback from general practice staff (n = 9); (3) Prepiloting: delivering the audit and feedback within the IMP2ART implementation strategy (incorporating patient and professional resources and an asthma review template) and eliciting clinician feedback (n = 9). Results: Audit and feedback design was guided by and mapped to existing literature suggestions and theory (e.g., Theoretical Domains Framework, Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy). Feedback on the prototype audit and feedback confirmed feasibility but identified some refinements (a need to highlight supporting self‐management and importance of asthma action plans). Prepiloting informed integration with other IMP2ART programme strategies (e.g., patient resources and professional education). Conclusion: We conclude that a multistage development process including theory exploration and mapping, contributed to the design and delivery of the audit and feedback. Aligned with the MRC framework, the IMP2ART strategy (incorporating the audit and feedback) is now being tested in a UK‐wide cluster randomised controlled trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Non-randomised feasibility study testing a primary care intervention to promote engagement in an online health community for adults with troublesome asthma: protocol

Author

Karampatakis, Georgios Dimitrios, primary, Wood, Helen E, additional, Griffiths, Chris J, additional, Taylor, Stephanie J C, additional, Toffolutti, Veronica, additional, Bird, Victoria J, additional, Lea, Nathan C, additional, Ashcroft, Richard E, additional, Day, Bill, additional, Coulson, Neil S, additional, Panzarasa, Pietro, additional, Li, Xiancheng, additional, Sheikh, Aziz, additional, Relton, Clare, additional, Sastry, Nishanth, additional, Watson, Jane S, additional, Marsh, Viv, additional, Mant, Jonathan, additional, Mihaylova, Borislava, additional, Walker, Neil, additional, and De Simoni, Anna, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. Supervised pulmonary hypertension exercise rehabilitation (SPHERe): study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Author

McGregor, Gordon, Bruce, Julie, Ennis, Stuart, Mason, James, Lall, Ranjit, Ji, Chen, Sandhu, Harbinder, Seers, Kate, Banerjee, Prithwish, Canaway, Alastair, Booth, Katie, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Robertson, Elizabeth, Pincus, Tamar, Singh, Sally, Fitzmaurice, David, Bowater, Sarah, Clift, Paul, and Underwood, Martin

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. Reducing Opioid Use for Chronic Pain With a Group-Based Intervention

Author

Sandhu, Harbinder K., primary, Booth, Katie, additional, Furlan, Andrea D., additional, Shaw, Jane, additional, Carnes, Dawn, additional, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., additional, Abraham, Charles, additional, Alleyne, Sharisse, additional, Balasubramanian, Shyam, additional, Betteley, Lauren, additional, Haywood, Kirstie L., additional, Iglesias-Urrutia, Cynthia P., additional, Krishnan, Sheeja, additional, Lall, Ranjit, additional, Manca, Andrea, additional, Mistry, Dipesh, additional, Newton, Sian, additional, Noyes, Jennifer, additional, Nichols, Vivien, additional, Padfield, Emma, additional, Rahman, Anisur, additional, Seers, Kate, additional, Tang, Nicole K. Y., additional, Tysall, Colin, additional, Eldabe, Sam, additional, and Underwood, Martin, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Childhood blood pressure : the influence of fetal and childhood factors

Author

Taylor, Stephanie J. C.

Subjects
618.92132
Abstract

Background: The 'fetal origins' hypothesis suggests raised blood pressure may arise from adverse events associated with impaired growth when the individual was in utero. Understanding the determinants of childhood blood pressure may have implications for the primary prevention of adult cardiovascular disease. Aims: To examine the influence of both current and early life factors (including size at birth, maternal antenatal blood pressure and maternal smoking during pregnancy) on the level of childhood blood pressure and on blood pressure change during childhood. Methods: A mixed longitudinal, school based survey of children from ten towns in England and Wales. The thesis uses cross-sectional data collected from the 1994 survey on 3,724 children aged 8-11 years, and longitudinal data from the 1990 and 1994 surveys on 2,322 children between the ages of 5-7 years and 9-11 years. Results: Current body size was the most important determinant of blood pressure at age 8-11 and change in ponderal index was the most important determinant of blood pressure change between 5-7 and 9-11 years. Birth weight was inversely associated with systolic blood pressure at 8-11 after adjustment for current body size. An unexplained sex difference was seen in this association - the inverse association was concentrated in the girls and attenuated or absent in the boys. Placental weight and other measures of size at birth, apart from head circumference, were not consistently associated with blood pressure in either sex. The association between birth weight and blood pressure was not explained by maternal antenatal hypertension. Maternal smoking during pregnancy did not influence childhood blood pressure at 8-11 years. Conclusions: Childhood adiposity has the strongest influence on childhood blood pressure. Although small size at birth is inversely related to childhood blood pressure, the magnitude of this effect is small.

Published
2002

26. IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP2ART) in primary care:study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled implementation trial

Author

McClatchey, Kirstie, Hammersley, Vicky, Steed, Liz, Sheringham, Jessica, Marsh, Viv, Barat, Atena, Delaney, Brigitte, Hamborg, Thomas, Fitzsimmons, Deborah, Holmes, Steve, Jackson, Tracy, Ehrlich, Elisabeth, Morgan, Noelle, Saxon, Ann, Preston, Megan, Price, David, Taylor, Stephanie J C, and Pinnock, Hilary

Subjects
Asthma/therapy, Primary Health Care, Self-Management, General Practice, Quality of Life, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common long-term condition and major public health problem. Supported self-management for asthma that includes a written personalised asthma action plan, supported by regular professional review, reduces unscheduled consultations and improves asthma outcomes and quality of life. However, despite unequivocal inter/national guideline recommendations, supported self-management is poorly implemented in practice. The IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP2ART) implementation strategy has been developed to address this challenge. The aim of this implementation trial is to determine whether facilitated delivery of the IMP2ART strategy increases the provision of asthma action plans and reduces unscheduled care in the context of routine UK primary care.METHODS: IMP2ART is a parallel group, cluster randomised controlled hybrid II implementation trial. One hundred forty-four general practices will be randomly assigned to either the IMP2ART implementation strategy or control group. Following a facilitation workshop, implementation group practices will receive organisational resources to help them prioritise supported self-management (including audit and feedback; an IMP2ART asthma review template), training for professionals and resources to support patients to self-manage their asthma. The control group will continue with usual asthma care. The primary clinical outcome is the between-group difference in unscheduled care in the second year after randomisation (i.e. between 12 and 24 months post-randomisation) assessed from routine data. Additionally, a primary implementation outcome of asthma action plan ownership at 12 months will be assessed by questionnaire to a random sub-group of people with asthma. Secondary outcomes include the number of asthma reviews conducted, prescribing outcomes (reliever medication and oral steroids), asthma symptom control, patients' confidence in self-management and professional support and resource use. A health economic analysis will assess cost-effectiveness, and a mixed methods process evaluation will explore implementation, fidelity and adaptation.DISCUSSION: The evidence for supported asthma self-management is overwhelming. This study will add to the literature regarding strategies that can effectively implement supported self-management in primary care to reduce unscheduled consultations and improve asthma outcomes and quality of life.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15448074. Registered on 2 December 2019.

Published
2023

27. Chronic Headache Education and Self-Management Study (CHESS): a process evaluation

Author

Pincus, Tamar, Ellard, David R., Nichols, Vivien P, Griffiths, Frances E, Underwood, Martin, and Taylor, Stephanie J C

Abstract

BackgroundThe Chronic Headache Education and Self-Management Study (CHESS) multicentre randomised trial evaluated the impact a group education and self-management support intervention with a best usual care plus relaxation control for people living with chronic headache disorders (tension type headaches or chronic migraine, with or without medication overuse headache). Here we report the process evaluation exploring potential explanations for the lack of positive effects from the CHESS intervention.MethodsThe CHESS trial included 736 (380 intervention: 356 control) people across the Midlands and London UK. We used a mixed methods approach. Our extensive process evaluation looked at context, reach, recruitment, dose delivered, dose received, fidelity and experiences of participating in the trial, and included participants and trial staff. We also looked for evidence in our qualitative data to investigate whether the original causal assumptions underpinning the intervention were realised.ResultsThe CHESS trial reached out to a large diverse population and recruited a representative sample. Few people with chronic tension type headaches without migraine were identified and recruited. The expected ‘dose‘of the intervention was delivered to participants and intervention fidelity was high. Attendance (“dose received”) fell below expectation, although 261/380 (69%) received at least at least the pre-identified minimum dose. Intervention participants generally enjoyed being in the groups but there was little evidence to support the causal assumptions underpinning the intervention were realised.ConclusionsFrom a process evaluation perspective despite our extensive data collection and analysis, we do not have a clear understanding of why the trial outcome was negative as the intervention was delivered as planned. However, the lack of evidence that the intervention causal assumptions brought about the planned behaviour change may provide some insight. Our data suggests only modest changes in managing headache behaviours and some disparity in how participants engaged with components of the intervention within the timeframe of the study. Moving forwards, we need a better understanding of how those who live with chronic headache can be helped to manage this disabling condition more effectively over time.

Published
2023

40. IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP2ART) in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled implementation trial.

Author

McClatchey, Kirstie, Hammersley, Vicky, Steed, Liz, Sheringham, Jessica, Marsh, Viv, Barat, Atena, Delaney, Brigitte, Hamborg, Thomas, Fitzsimmons, Deborah, Holmes, Steve, Jackson, Tracy, Ehrlich, Elisabeth, Morgan, Noelle, Saxon, Ann, Preston, Megan, Price, David, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., and Pinnock, Hilary

Subjects
ASTHMATICS, PRIMARY care, RESEARCH protocols, ASTHMA, ORAL medication
Abstract

Background: Asthma is a common long-term condition and major public health problem. Supported self-management for asthma that includes a written personalised asthma action plan, supported by regular professional review, reduces unscheduled consultations and improves asthma outcomes and quality of life. However, despite unequivocal inter/national guideline recommendations, supported self-management is poorly implemented in practice. The IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP2ART) implementation strategy has been developed to address this challenge. The aim of this implementation trial is to determine whether facilitated delivery of the IMP2ART strategy increases the provision of asthma action plans and reduces unscheduled care in the context of routine UK primary care. Methods: IMP2ART is a parallel group, cluster randomised controlled hybrid II implementation trial. One hundred forty-four general practices will be randomly assigned to either the IMP2ART implementation strategy or control group. Following a facilitation workshop, implementation group practices will receive organisational resources to help them prioritise supported self-management (including audit and feedback; an IMP2ART asthma review template), training for professionals and resources to support patients to self-manage their asthma. The control group will continue with usual asthma care. The primary clinical outcome is the between-group difference in unscheduled care in the second year after randomisation (i.e. between 12 and 24 months post-randomisation) assessed from routine data. Additionally, a primary implementation outcome of asthma action plan ownership at 12 months will be assessed by questionnaire to a random sub-group of people with asthma. Secondary outcomes include the number of asthma reviews conducted, prescribing outcomes (reliever medication and oral steroids), asthma symptom control, patients' confidence in self-management and professional support and resource use. A health economic analysis will assess cost-effectiveness, and a mixed methods process evaluation will explore implementation, fidelity and adaptation. Discussion: The evidence for supported asthma self-management is overwhelming. This study will add to the literature regarding strategies that can effectively implement supported self-management in primary care to reduce unscheduled consultations and improve asthma outcomes and quality of life. Trial registration: ISRCTN15448074. Registered on 2 December 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. Additional file 1 of Evaluating an interactive acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) workshop delivered to trained therapists working with cancer patients in the United Kingdom: a mixed methods approach

Author

Moschopoulou, Elisavet, Brewin, Debbie, Ridge, Damien, Donovan, Sheila, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Bourke, Liam, Eva, Gail, Khan, Imran, and Chalder, Trudie

Abstract

Additional file 1. Content of the ACT+ Training Programme and Topic Guide for Therapist Interviews post ACT+ training. Description of data: Two tables are included in this word document. S1 presents in detail the content and structure of the ACT+ training programme. S2 presents the topic guide used for the purposes of the qualitative interviews reported in this article.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

45. Additional file 1 of STOP— a training intervention to optimise treatment for smoking cessation in community pharmacies: cluster randomised controlled trial

Author

Jumbe, Sandra, Madurasinghe, Vichithranie W., James, Wai Yee, Houlihan, Colin, Jumbe, Samantha L., Yau, Tammy, Tomini, Florian, Eldridge, Sandra, Mihaylova, Borislava, Steed, Liz, Sohanpal, Ratna, Attar, Darush, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Griffiths, Chris, and Walton, Robert

Abstract

Additional file 1: Figure S1. TIDieR Checklist for the STOP Trial Intervention.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

50. Additional file 3 of The development of a theory and evidence-based intervention to aid implementation of exercise into the prostate cancer care pathway with a focus on healthcare professional behaviour, the STAMINA trial

Author

Turner, Rebecca R., Madelynne A. Arden, Reale, Sophie, Sutton, Eileen, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Bourke, Liam, Greenfield, Diana M., Morrissey, Dylan, Brown, Janet, Doherty, Patrick, Rosario, Derek J., and Steed, Liz

Subjects
education, humanities
Abstract

Additional file 3. Feedback on the healthcare professional intervention following the rehearsal delivery. This file provides feedback on the intervention (training package) following rehearsal delivery to healthcare professionals. Feedback is collated into key themes and mapped onto the APEASE criteria.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results