Search

There is a little datum about the impact of paclitaxel dosage in patients undergoing drug-coated balloons (DCB) in endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal lesions. In the current study, the authors sought to compare the clinical outcomes of low-dose (LD) and high-dose (HD) paclitaxel DCBs for patients undergoing EVT for femoropopliteal lesions in a real-world setting.The study population was derived from a multicenter registry named "Evaluation of clinical outcome after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal artery disease in Kanagawa" (LANDMARK registry). This registry consists of patients from 5 hospitals in Kanagawa, Japan. Overall, 1,378 patients with 1,777 lesions received treatment between July 2017 and June 2020. Among these, DCB angioplasty was performed in 477 patients (516 lesions). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of LD-DCB (Lutonix; Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) and HD-DCB (IN.PACT Admiral; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA).A total of 160 matched pairs of lesions were analyzed. Primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization at 2 years were similar between the two groups (LD-DCB vs. HD-DCB: 72% vs. 70%, p = 0.53; and 75% vs. 73%, p = 0.59, respectively).No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between LD-DCB and HD-DCB angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions.Level 3.

Little evidence is available regarding the long-term outcome in elderly patients after deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve (FFR).Methods and Results: From the J-CONFIRM registry (long-term outcomes of Japanese patients with deferral of coronary intervention based on fractional flow reserve in multicenter registry), 1,262 patients were divided into 2 groups according to age: elderly and younger patients (aged ≥75 or75 years, respectively). The primary endpoint was the cumulative 5-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (CDTVR). Cumulative 5-year incidence of TVF was not significantly different between elderly and younger patients (14.3% vs. 10.8%, P=0.12). Cardiac death occurred more frequently in elderly patients than younger patients (4.4% vs. 0.8%, P0.001), whereas TVMI and CDTVR did not differ between groups (1.3% vs. 0.9%, P=0.80; 10.7% vs. 10.1%, P=0.80, respectively). FFR values in lesions with diameter stenosis50% were significantly higher in elderly patients than in younger patients (0.88±0.07 vs. 0.85±0.07, P=0.01), whereas this relationship was not observed in those with diameter stenosis ≥50%.Elderly patients had no excess risk of ischemic events related to the deferred coronary lesions by FFR, although FFR values in mild coronary artery stenosis were modestly different between elderly and younger patients.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). However, outcomes stratified according to the preoperative symptoms of PAD in patients with AF have not been sufficiently investigated. This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data pertaining to 2237 patients (1179 patients with intermittent claudication [IC] and 1058 patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI]) who underwent endovascular therapy at 34 hospitals between August 2014 and August 2016. AF was present in 91 (7.7%) patients with IC and 150 (14.2%) patients with CLTI. In the CLTI group, patients with AF had a higher event rate of MACCE and all-cause death than those without AF (1-year rates of freedom from MACCE: 0.66 and 0.81 in patients with and without AF, respectively, p 0.001). In contrast, in the IC group, there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of MACCE between patients with and without AF. In the Cox multivariate analysis, AF was a significant predictor of MACCE in patients with CLTI but not in patients with IC, even after adjusting for covariates. The impact of AF on the outcome of patients with PAD was greater in those with CLTI. Further studies are needed to clarify the possible mechanisms underlying these differences.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of thrombotic risk on the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with deferred revascularization after fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements.Deferral of revascularization on the basis of FFR is generally considered to be safe, but after deferral, some patients have cardiovascular events over time.From J-CONFIRM registry (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), 1,263 patients with deferral of revascularization on the basis of FFR were evaluated. The association between thrombotic risk as assessed by CREDO-Kyoto (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto) thrombotic score and 5-year target vessel failure (TVF) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was investigated.FFR and high thrombotic risk (HTR) were associated with increased risk for 5-year TVF (FFR per 0.01-unit decrease: HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05-1.11; P 0.001; HTR: HR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.37-3.39; P 0.001) and MACCE (FFR per 0.01-unit decrease: HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06; P 0.001; HTR: HR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.56-2.84; P = 0.001). Patients with HTR had higher risk for 5-year TVF (HR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.45-3.66; P 0.001) and MACCE (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.75-3.13; P 0.001) than those without HTR, even when they had negative FFR.Assessment of thrombotic risk provides additional prognostic value to FFR in predicting 5-year TVF and MACCE in patients with deferral of revascularization after FFR measurements. (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry; UMIN000014473).

Background: The effect of symptoms on clinical outcomes after deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains poorly understood. Methods and Results: From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter) Registry, this study evaluated 1,215 patients with stable coronary artery disease, including symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (n=571 and 644, respectively). The primary endpoint was the cumulative 2-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (CDTVR). An inverse probability weighted analysis was performed to adjust for the differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. At 2 years, the TVF rate did not differ significantly between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (6.5% vs. 4.9%, respectively; P=0.15) or between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with lesions with an FFR ≤0.80 (8.0% vs. 12.3%, respectively; P=0.20). Conversely, symptomatic patients showed significantly higher rates of TVF (6.2% vs. 3.3%; P=0.01) and CDTVR (6.2% vs. 3.1%; P=0.009) than asymptomatic patients, regardless of negative FFR values (>0.80). Conclusions: Despite negative FFR values, symptomatic patients were at higher risk of TVF than asymptomatic patients, driven primarily by a higher rate of CDTVR. Conversely, those with a positive FFR were likely to develop TVF regardless of their symptoms.

Background: Little large-scale data is available about the long-term (beyond 3 years) clinical outcomes after fractional flow reserve (FFR)–based deferral of revascularization in clinical practice. We sought to assess the 5-year outcomes after deferral of revascularization based on FFR. Methods: The J-CONFIRM registry (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry) prospectively enrolled 1263 patients with 1447 lesions in whom revascularization was deferred based on FFR from 28 Japanese centers. The primary study end point was the cumulative 5-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Results: Five-year follow-up was completed in 92.2% of patients. The 5-year TVF rate was 11.6% in deferred lesions, mainly driven by clinically driven target vessel revascularization (9.8%). Cardiac death and target vessel–related myocardial infarction were 1.9% and 0.95%, respectively. Cumulative 5-year incidence of TVF was similar between the FFR 0.75 to 0.80 and 0.81 to 0.85 groups even after adjustment for baseline characteristics (12.2% versus 13.0%, inverse probability–weighted hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.46–1.60]; P =0.63). Compared with the almost normal FFR (0.86–1.00) group, the significant (P Conclusions: The 5-year TVF rate was 11.6% in deferred lesions, mainly driven by clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Notably, cardiac death and target vessel–related myocardial infarction rarely occurred during the follow-up. Our findings highlight the long-term safety of FFR-based deferral of revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr ; Unique identifier: UMIN000014473.

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is essential to prevent future cardiovascular events in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients. However, whether achieving optimal GDMT could improve clinical outcomes in CCS patients with deferred lesions based on fraction flow reserve (FFR) remains thoroughly investigated. We sought to evaluate the association of GDMT adherence with long-term outcomes after FFR-based deferral of revascularization in a real-world registry.This is a post-hoc analysis of the J-CONFIRM registry (long-term outcomes of Japanese patients with deferral of coronary intervention based on fractional flow reserve in multicentre registry). Optimal GDMT was defined as combining four types of medications: antiplatelet drug, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, beta-blocker, and statin. After stratifying patients by the number of individual GDMT agents at 2 years, landmark analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between GDMT adherence at 2 years and 5-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Compared with the suboptimal GDMT group (continuing ≤3 types of medications, n = 974), the optimal GDMT group (n = 139) showed a lower 5-year incidence of MACE (5.2% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.02). The optimal GDMT was associated with a lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.92; P = 0.03).Patients with optimal GDMT were associated with better outcomes, suggesting the importance of achieving optimal GDMT on long-term prognosis in CCS patients after FFR-guided deferral of revascularization.

Purpose: The underlying difference between intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) still remains unclear. This prospective multicenter observational study aimed to clarify differences in clinical features and prognostic outcomes between IC and CLTI, and prognostic factors in patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT). Materials and Methods: A total of 692 patients with 808 limbs were enrolled from 20 institutions in Japan. The primary measurements were the 3-year rates of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and reintervention. Results: Among patients, 79.0% had IC and 21.0% had CLTI. Patients with CLTI were more frequently women and more likely to have impaired functional status, undernutrition, comorbidities, hypercoagulation, hyperinflammation, distal artery disease, short single antiplatelet and long anticoagulation therapies, and late cilostazol than patients with IC. Aortoiliac and femoropopliteal diseases were dominant in patients with IC and infrapopliteal disease was dominant in patients with CLTI. Patients with CLTI underwent less frequently aortoiliac intervention and more frequently infrapopliteal intervention than patients with IC. Longitudinal change of ankle-brachial index (ABI) exhibited different patterns between IC and CLTI (pinteraction=0.002), but ABI improved after EVT both in IC and in CLTI (pConclusions: The CLTI is characterized not only by more systemic comorbidities and distal disease but also by more inflammatory coagulation disorder compared with IC. Also, CLTI has approximately twice MACE and reintervention rates than IC, and the underlying inflammatory coagulation disorder per se is associated with these outcomes. Clinical Impact The underlying difference between intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) still remains unclear. This prospective multicenter observational study, JPASSION study found that CLTI was characterized not only by more systemic comorbidities and distal disease but also by more inflammatory coagulation disorder compared to IC. Also, CLTI had approximately twice major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and reintervention rates than IC. Intriguingly, the underlying inflammatory coagulation disorder per se was independently associated with MACE and reintervention. Further studies to clarify the role of anticoagulation and anti-inflammatory therapies will contribute to the development of post-interventional therapeutics in the context of peripheral artery disease.

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) play an important role in endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. Cilostazol improves patency after bare-metal nitinol stent (BNS) implantation for femoropopliteal lesions. This study aimed to establish whether cilostazol is effective in improving the patency of DESs and determine whether BNS or DESs with or without cilostazol are more effective in improving the 12-month patency after EVT for FP lesions.In this prospective, open-label, multicenter study, 85 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease due to de novo FP lesions were enrolled and treated with DESs with cilostazol from eight cardiovascular centers between April 2018 and May 2019. They were compared with 255 patients from the DEBATE SFA study, in which patients were randomly assigned to the BNS, BNS with cilostazol, or DES groups. The primary endpoint was the 12-month patency rate using duplex ultrasound (peak systolic velocity ratio2.5). This study was approved by the ethics committee of each hospital.The 12-month patency rates for the BNS, BNS with cilostazol, DES, and DES with cilostazol groups were 77.6%, 93.1%, 82.8%, and 94.2%, respectively (p = 0.007). The 12-month patency rate was higher in the DES with cilostazol group than in the DES group (p = 0.044). In small vessels, the DES with cilostazol group had a higher patency rate than the DES group (100.0% vs. 83.4%, p = 0.023).DES with cilostazol showed better patency than DES alone. Cilostazol improved patency after EVT with DES in FP lesions and small vessels.University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (no. UMIN 000032473).

Aim: Although the Innova™ self-expanding nitinol stent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) exhibits acceptable performance in long-term safety and efficacy when used for the treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) lesions, clinical outcomes following its implantation have not been systematically studied in real-world settings. We investigated the one-year clinical outcomes after implantation of Innova™ self-expanding nitinol stents for the treatment of FP lesions in real-world settings. Methods: In this multicenter study, 481 lesions in 453 consecutive patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) (74 ± 9 years; male, 70%; diabetes mellitus, 61%; dialysis, 27%; critical limb ischemia, 37%) who underwent endovascular therapy with the implantation of Innova™ self-expanding nitinol stents for FP lesions were analyzed from February 2016 to April 2017. The primary endpoint was one-year restenosis, whereas the secondary endpoints included one-year major adverse limb events and predictors for one-year restenosis. Results: The mean lesion length was 18 ± 10 cm. One-year restenosis and major adverse limb event rates were 36% and 18%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR]: 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–3.13), distal reference vessel diameter (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.09–3.16), spot stenting (OR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.27–4.06), and lack of one-year cilostazol treatment (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.33–1.00) were independent risk factors for one-year restenosis. Conclusion: The current study demonstrated one-year clinical outcomes after Innova™ self-expanding nitinol stent placement for the treatment of FP lesions, including challenging cases in real-world settings.

To identify the risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in real-world practice for symptomatic peripheral artery disease in Japan.Data on Japanese patients (N = 880) from the Observational Prospective Multicenter Registry Study on Outcomes of Peripheral Arterial Disease Patients Treated by Angioplasty Therapy for Aortoiliac Artery who underwent de novo aortoiliac stent placement. The 3-year risk of incident MACEs was investigated.The median age of the patients was 72.6 years (range, 34-97 years), and 83.1% of the patients were men. The patients had the following conditions: smoking (35.6%), hypertension (94.1%), dyslipidemia (81.7%), diabetes (48.0%), renal failure on dialysis (12.6%), myocardial infarction (12.7%), stroke (15.8%), and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (7.1%). Femoropopliteal lesions were present in 38.8% of the limbs with aortoiliac lesions. The 3-year rate of freedom from MACEs was 89.1%. Baseline characteristics, such as age, renal failure on dialysis, myocardial infarction, stroke, and femoropopliteal lesions, were independently associated with the risk of incident MACEs. When the study population was stratified according to these risk factors, the rate of MACEs was highest in patients with at least 3 risk factors (32.9% at 3 years).The 3-year rate of freedom from MACEs was reported. Baseline characteristics, such as age, renal failure on dialysis, myocardial infarction, stroke, and femoropopliteal lesions, are independent risk factors for MACEs after aortoiliac stent placement.

Background Stent thrombosis (ST) after drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation remains a life‐threatening complication. Recurrent ST (RST) is not a rare phenomenon, potentially contributing to high mortality after the index ST events. However, little evidence is available about the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of definite RST after DES thrombosis. Methods and Results From REAL‐ST (Retrospective Multicenter Registry of ST After First‐ and Second‐ Generation DES Implantation), this study evaluated 595 patients with definite ST (first‐generation DES thrombosis, n=314; second‐generation DES thrombosis, n=281). During a median follow‐up of 31 months, we identified 32 patients with definite RST after first‐generation DES thrombosis (n=18) and second‐generation DES thrombosis (n=15). Cumulative incidence of RST was 4.5% and 6.0% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, which did not significantly differ between first‐generation DES thrombosis and second‐generation DES thrombosis. Independent predictors of definite RST were early ST (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.06–5.35 [ P =0.035]) and multivessel ST (HR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.03–11.7 [ P =0.044]). Definite RST was associated with a 2.8‐fold increased risk of mortality (adjusted HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.35–5.73 [ P =0.006]). Conclusions Cumulative incidence of definite RST did not significantly differ between first‐generation DES thrombosis and second‐generation DES thrombosis. Early ST and multivessel ST were risk factors of definite RST. Definite RST significantly increased mortality after DES thrombosis, highlighting the clinical importance of preventing RST to improve outcomes of patients with ST. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: UMIN000025181.

Several studies have reported a relationship between clinical outcomes and the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in different populations. However, the relationship in Japanese patients or in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been examined well.Methods and Results:The subjects were 1,857 patients who underwent PCI from July 2007 to May 2010 and in whom the carotid and renal arteries and abdominal aorta were examined simultaneously by ultrasonography and ABI. We investigated the relationship between ABI and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke). The median follow-up was 1,322 days (interquartile range: 1,092-1,566 days). Patients with low (0.9), borderline (0.9-1.0) and high ABI (1.4) had significantly higher incidence of MACE at 4 years (31%, 15%, 10%, and 29% for the low, borderline, normal, and high groups, respectively; log-rank P0.0001) and all-cause mortality at 4 years (22%, 12%, 6.9%, and 29%, respectively; P0.0001) compared with the normal ABI group (1.0≤ABI≤1.4). The adjusted hazard ratios for MACE were 2.35 (1.72-3.20), 1.27 (0.89-1.80) and 1.87 (0.81-3.79) for low, borderline and high ABI, respectively.This study suggested that ABI provides additional information for cardiovascular disease risk stratification in Japanese patients undergoing PCI, even it is borderline ABI.

Crossover stenting of femoral bifurcation raises the concern of jeopardizing the deep femoral artery (DFA) entry, thereby increasing future risk of limb-threatening ischemia and amputation. This retrospective multicenter study compared clinical outcomes of crossover stenting and non-crossover stenting for ostial superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. We reviewed 125 limbs in 103 patients with successful stent implantation for ostial SFA lesions and allocated them to two groups, based on whether the stent crossed over the DFA orifice (CO, n = 54) or not (NC, n = 71). The decision of applying whether CO or NC was at the operators' discretion. Primary endpoints were incidences of major amputation and acute limb ischemia (ALI) at 24 months, and secondary endpoints were incidences of death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), composite of amputation or death, and major adverse limb events which was a composite of major amputation, ALI, TLR, or death at 24 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Major amputation occurred only in the NC group, while ALI occurred only in the CO group. Kaplan-Meier estimation showed no significant differences in incidences of major amputation (NC: 3.0% vs. CO: 0.0%, p = 0.21), ALI, or any of the secondary endpoints. However, there was a trend towards higher incidence of ALI in the CO group (NC 0.0% vs. CO 3.9%, p = 0.11). Crossover stenting did not result in a significant difference in major amputation compared to non-crossover stenting within 24 months. However, it showed a trend towards higher incidence of ALI.

Objectives The NIPPON (Nobori Dual Antiplatelet Therapy as Appropriate Duration) study was a multicenter randomized investigation of the noninferiority of short-term versus long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with implantation of the Nobori drug-eluting stent (DES) (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), which has a biodegradable abluminal coating. Background The optimum duration of DAPT for patients with a biodegradable polymer-coated DES is unclear. Methods The subjects were 3,773 patients with stable or acute coronary syndromes undergoing Nobori stent implantation. They were randomized 1:1 to receive DAPT for 6 or 18 months. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical and cerebrovascular events (NACCE) (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding) from 6 to 18 months after stenting. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed in 3,307 patients who were followed for at least 6 months. Results NACCE occurred in 34 patients (2.1%) receiving short-term DAPT and 24 patients (1.5%) receiving long-term DAPT (difference 0.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 0.3). Because the lower limit of the 95% CI was inside the specified margin of −2%, noninferiority of short-term DAPT was confirmed. Mortality was 1.0% with short-term DAPT versus 0.4% with long-term DAPT, whereas myocardial infarction was 0.2% versus 0.1%, and major bleeding was 0.7% versus 0.7%, respectively. The estimated probability of NACCE was lower in the long-term DAPT group (hazard ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.86 to 2.43). Conclusions Six months of DAPT was not inferior to 18 months of DAPT following implantation of a DES with a biodegradable abluminal coating. However, this result needs to be interpreted with caution given the open-label design and wide noninferiority margin of the present study. (Nobori Dual Antiplatelet Therapy as Appropriate Duration [NIPPON]; NCT01514227)

New-generation bare-metal nitinol (BNS) and drug-eluting stents have improved long-term outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal lesions. Furthermore, cilostazol reduces in-stent restenosis (ISR) after first-generation BNS implantation for femoropopliteal lesions.We studied 255 patients with femoropopliteal lesions treated at 25 cardiovascular centers. Patients were randomly assigned to the BNS group (Misago stent implantation without cilostazol), BNS with cilostazol group (Misago stent implantation with cilostazol), or drug-eluting stents group (Zilver PTX stent implantation without cilostazol). Primary end point was 1-year restenosis noted using duplex ultrasound (peak systolic velocity ratio,2.0). Secondary end point was major adverse limb events (limb-related death, target lesion revascularization, major amputation, and major bleeding). During the 1-year follow-up, 12 patients (4.7%) died and 237 (92.9%) had relevant ultrasound findings. The 1-year ISR rate did not differ significantly among the BNS, BNS with cilostazol, and drug-eluting stents groups (28.4% versus 12.2% versus 21.0%; P=0.052). Although the 1-year ISR rate was significantly lower in the BNS with cilostazol group than in the BNS group, it was similar to that in the drug-eluting stents group ( P=0.16). Major adverse limb event was significantly higher in the BNS group (16.9% versus 6.5% versus 6.3%; P=0.034); however, target lesion revascularization and major bleeding were similar (9.7% versus 5.1% versus 3.6%; P=0.25, 4.8% versus 1.2% versus 2.4%; P=0.37, respectively).Misago stent implantation with cilostazol showed a comparable 1-year ISR rate with Zilver PTX. Cilostazol reduced the 1-year ISR rate after endovascular therapy when used with new-generation BNS.URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ . Unique identifier: UMIN 000010071.

Background: New-generation bare-metal nitinol (BNS) and drug-eluting stents have improved long-term outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal lesions. Furthermore, cilostazol reduces in-stent restenosis (ISR) after first-generation BNS implantation for femoropopliteal lesions. Methods and Results: We studied 255 patients with femoropopliteal lesions treated at 25 cardiovascular centers. Patients were randomly assigned to the BNS group (Misago stent implantation without cilostazol), BNS with cilostazol group (Misago stent implantation with cilostazol), or drug-eluting stents group (Zilver PTX stent implantation without cilostazol). Primary end point was 1-year restenosis noted using duplex ultrasound (peak systolic velocity ratio, >2.0). Secondary end point was major adverse limb events (limb-related death, target lesion revascularization, major amputation, and major bleeding). During the 1-year follow-up, 12 patients (4.7%) died and 237 (92.9%) had relevant ultrasound findings. The 1-year ISR rate did not differ significantly among the BNS, BNS with cilostazol, and drug-eluting stents groups (28.4% versus 12.2% versus 21.0%; P =0.052). Although the 1-year ISR rate was significantly lower in the BNS with cilostazol group than in the BNS group, it was similar to that in the drug-eluting stents group ( P =0.16). Major adverse limb event was significantly higher in the BNS group (16.9% versus 6.5% versus 6.3%; P =0.034); however, target lesion revascularization and major bleeding were similar (9.7% versus 5.1% versus 3.6%; P =0.25, 4.8% versus 1.2% versus 2.4%; P =0.37, respectively). Conclusions: Misago stent implantation with cilostazol showed a comparable 1-year ISR rate with Zilver PTX. Cilostazol reduced the 1-year ISR rate after endovascular therapy when used with new-generation BNS. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ . Unique identifier: UMIN 000010071.

BACKGROUND The present study was performed to clarify whether the preoperative clinical symptoms for endovascular therapy (EVT) can predict post-EVT death and cardiovascular prognosis in Japanese patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), including acute disease.Methods and Results:The TOkyo taMA peripheral vascular intervention research COmraDE (Toma-Code) Registry is a Japanese prospective cohort of 2,321 consecutive patients with PAD treated with EVT, in 34 hospitals in the Kanto and Kōshin'etsu regions, from August 2014 to August 2016. In total, 2,173 symptomatic patients were followed up for a median of 10.4 months, including 1,370 with claudication, 719 with critical limb ischemia (CLI), and 84 with acute limb ischemia (ALI) for EVT. The all-cause death rates per 100 person-years for claudication, CLI and ALI were 3.5, 26.2, and 24.5, respectively. Similarly, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rates per 100 person-years for claudication, CLI, ALI, and others were 5.2, 31.2, and 29.7, respectively. After adjusting for the predictors of all-cause death and MACCE, namely, age, body mass index

Stent placement for treating superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions has been approved. The Zilver PTX stent, a drug-eluting stent (DES) for treating SFA lesions, has been available in Japan since 2012. However, the penetration rate of this DES has not yet been reported. This prospective multicenter registry study enrolled 314 patients (354 limbs) to be treated by stent placement in 2014 (UMIN000011551). The primary endpoint was the measurement of the penetration rate of the DES. The secondary endpoints were measuring the freedom from restenosis, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), freedom from major adverse limb event (MALE), and the survival rate at 12 months postoperatively. Female patients comprised 28% participants. The mean age was 73.1 ± 9.2 years. A total of 56% patients had diabetes mellitus (DM), 36% patients were receiving hemodialysis, and 30% used cilostazol at baseline. The mean lesion length was 156 ± 101 mm, and the percentage of TASC II C/D lesions was 58%. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) was observed in 32% limbs. The penetration rates of the Zilver PTX stent were only 8%. The primary patency rate was similar between DES and bare-metal stents (BMS) at 12 months postoperatively (77 vs. 84%, p = 0.52). In this study, the rates of freedom from restenosis, freedom from TLR, freedom from MALE, and the survival rate at 12 months postoperatively were 83, 86, 85, and 89%, respectively. The penetration rate of a first-generation DES placement for treating SFA lesions is low in Japan. On the other hand, BMS is well utilized and its primary patency is acceptable.

Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of polyvascular disease (polyVD; defined as lower extremity artery disease, carotid artery disease, renal artery disease, or abdominal aortic aneurysm) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results: The subjects were 1,597 patients who underwent PCI and who were prospectively enrolled in the study. The carotid, renal and peripheral arteries and abdominal aorta were simultaneously evaluated using duplex ultrasound and ankle-brachial index to evaluate the presence of polyVD. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction [MI], and stroke). PolyVD was found in 446 of 1,597 patients (27.9%). MACE were significantly higher in the polyVD group compared to those with coronary artery disease (CAD) alone (n=1,151; 12.1% vs. 3.8%, P

A 69-year-old man who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery in February 2008. The surgery included grafting of the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to the diagonal branch (D1) and a saphenous vein graft (SVG) to the left circumflex artery (LCX) due to ostial stenosis of the left main coronary artery (LMCA). The patient presented with recurring effort chest pain 18 months later. Coronary CT revealed that the LITA-D1 graft was patent, the SVG-LCX graft was occluded, and there was severe ostial stenosis of the LMCA. Coronary angiography was performed in August 2009, but a 5-Fr diagnostic catheter could not be engaged due to the severe ostial stenosis. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed 5 days later with an attempt to cross the lesion with a guidewire using a retrograde approach through the LITA-D1 graft. However, the guidewire could not be crossed using a conventional technique due to the extreme angulation of the LITA-D1 anastomosis. Therefore, we attempted to use a reversed guidewire technique. After crossing the LMCA ostial lesion the retrograde wire was snared through antegradely for insertion of the guiding catheter via the right brachial artery. We were able to engage the guiding catheter in the left coronary artery and implant the stent successfully using the antegrade approach.