Search

ObjectivesVaccination remains the most effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Most vaccines use two-dose regimens. In turn, single-dose vaccines also have high potential, since, on the one hand, they simplify the vaccination program, make it more accessible and convenient for more people around the world, and on the other hand, they are better suited for subsequent revaccination. However, there is not enough data on the effectiveness of single-dose vaccine variants against new genetic lines to assess their current potential. It is not clear how much a single dose of immunization protects against the globally dominant delta variant. In this work, we investigated the effectiveness of a single dose vaccine (Sputnik Light, the first component of Sputnik V vaccine) against the Delta variant in Moscow.MethodsTo assess the effectiveness of one dose of viral vector vaccine based on rAd26 against the delta variant in Moscow, we used data from the Moscow registries of vaccination against COVID-19 and the incidence of COVID-19. The availability of data on the number of seropositive residents of Moscow made it possible to consider the size of the immune layer formed because of a previous COVID-19 disease or vaccination. To calculate the effectiveness, the proportion of COVID-19 cases among those vaccinated with a single dose and the proportion of cases among those who were not vaccinated in July 2021.ResultsOur data indicate that throughout July 2021, the dominant variant of the coronavirus at the level of 99.5% in Moscow was the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant and its subsidiary lines. Considering the immune layer of 46% allowed us to calculate the effectiveness of a one-shot vaccine against the delta variant in Moscow during the first three months after vaccination at the level of 69.85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.08 to 74.70). In the 18-29-year-old group, the overall vaccine efficacy against the delta variant was 88.61%, in the 18-59 group - 75.28%. Sputnik Light demonstrates higher efficacy against Delta variant than many two-shot vaccines.ConclusionThe results indicate a high efficacy of a single immunization first component of Sputnik V vaccine against delta variant among young and middle-aged people, at least during the first 3 months after receiving the one-shot vaccine.

Introduction Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is acute inflammatory disease of respiratory system with a high mortality, caused Ьу coronavirus MERS-CoV At present moment, we still lack specific therapeutic preparations and vaccines against MERS Vaccine administration can help to limit the spread of the disease and lower the mortality Duration of vaccine-induced immune response is one of the key characteristics of a vaccine, which is connected with duration of its protective effectiveness Unfortunately, the data on duration of vaccine-induced immune response against MERS is scarce The aim of the study was to determine duration of humoral immune response in mice and primates and duration of protective immune response in mice after immunization with the heterologous virus-vectored vaccine against MERS (BVRS-GamVac-Combi), developed earlier Ьу our research group Material and methods To study duration of humoral immune response, we used mice of C57BL/6 strain and common marmosets Animals were immunized with the vaccine BVRS-GamVac-Combi, based on recomЬinant adenoviral vectors rAd26 and rAd5 Antigen-specific-antibody titers were determined with ELISA, virus-neutralizing antibody titers were measured with virus neutralization assay using MERS-CoV (EMC/2012) To study duration of protective immune response, we used a model of lethal infection on transgenic mice, carrying human DPP4 gene of viral receptor Results In present research, we showed that vaccination of animals with BVRS-GamVac-Combi induced robust humoral immune response, which persisted at least 18 months after immunization In addition, our vaccine protected 100 % of animals from lethal infection for at least 7 months after immunization Concluslon Strength of vaccine-induced immune response is generally connected with a protective effectiveness of a vaccine One of the key problems of vaccine design is to find a way to provide as long and robust immune response as possible Duration of vaccine-induced immune response is one of the key characteristics of a vaccine, which demands quality control during multiple steps of a vaccine development Введение Ближневосточный респираторный синдром (БВРС) - это острое воспалительное заболевание дыхательной системы с высокой летальностью, возбудителем которого является коронавирус БВРС-КоВ В настоящее время в мире не существует специфических профилактических и терапевтических средств против БВРС Вакцино-профилактика позволит ограничить распространение данного заболевания и снизить летальность Одной из ключевых характеристик вакцин является длительность индуцируемого иммунного ответа, от которой зависит продолжительность протективного эффекта вакцины К сожалению, данных по длительности поствакцинального иммунного ответа для вакцин против БВРС сейчас недостаточно Цель исследования - определение длительности гуморального иммунного ответа у грызунов и приматов и протективного иммунного ответа после иммунизации комбинированной векторной вакциной против БВРС (БВРС-ГамВак-Комби), разработанной нами ранее Материал и методы Длительность гуморального иммунитета исследовали на мышах линии C57BL/6 и обыкновенных игрунках Животных иммунизировали вакциной БВРС-ГамВак-Комби на основе рекомбинантных векторов rAd26 и rAd5 Титр антиген-специфических антител определяли методом иммуноферментного анализа (ИФА) Титр вирус-нейтрализующих антител определяли с помощью реакции вирус-нейтрализации против вируса БВРС-КоВ (MERS-CoV EMC/2012) Длительность протективного иммунитета исследовали на модели летальной инфекции у трансгенных мышей, несущих ген человека DPP4, кодирующий рецептор к БВРС-КоВ Результаты Исследование длительности поствакцинального гуморального иммунного ответа у грызунов и приматов показало, что вакцинация животных БВРС-ГамВак-Комби индуцирует формирование напряженного гуморального иммунного ответа к гликопротеину S БВРС-КоВ, который сохраняется на протяжении не менее 18 мес Также было показано, что вакцинация позволяет защитить 100 % животных от летальной инфекции, вызванной БВРС-КоВ (MERS-CoV EMC/2012, 100 ЛД50/мышь), через 7 мес после иммунизации Заключение Напряженность поствакцинального гуморального иммунного ответа, как правило, связана с протективностью вакцины Одной из ключевых задач при дизайне вакцин является обеспечение наиболее длительного напряженного иммунного ответа Длительность поствакцинального иммунного ответа - одна из ключевых характеристик вакцин, которая требует контроля на различных этапах их разработки

Background A heterologous recombinant adenovirus (rAd)-based vaccine, Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V), showed a good safety profile and induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses in participants in phase 1/2 clinical trials. Here, we report preliminary results on the efficacy and safety of Gam-COVID-Vac from the interim analysis of this phase 3 trial. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at 25 hospitals and polyclinics in Moscow, Russia. We included participants aged at least 18 years, with negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR and IgG and IgM tests, no infectious diseases in the 14 days before enrolment, and no other vaccinations in the 30 days before enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive vaccine or placebo, with stratification by age group. Investigators, participants, and all study staff were masked to group assignment. The vaccine was administered (0·5 mL/dose) intramuscularly in a prime-boost regimen: a 21-day interval between the first dose (rAd26) and the second dose (rAd5), both vectors carrying the gene for the full-length SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein S. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 from day 21 after receiving the first dose. All analyses excluded participants with protocol violations: the primary outcome was assessed in participants who had received two doses of vaccine or placebo, serious adverse events were assessed in all participants who had received at least one dose at the time of database lock, and rare adverse events were assessed in all participants who had received two doses and for whom all available data were verified in the case report form at the time of database lock. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04530396). Findings Between Sept 7 and Nov 24, 2020, 21 977 adults were randomly assigned to the vaccine group (n=16 501) or the placebo group (n=5476). 19 866 received two doses of vaccine or placebo and were included in the primary outcome analysis. From 21 days after the first dose of vaccine (the day of dose 2), 16 (0·1%) of 14 964 participants in the vaccine group and 62 (1·3%) of 4902 in the placebo group were confirmed to have COVID-19; vaccine efficacy was 91·6% (95% CI 85·6–95·2). Most reported adverse events were grade 1 (7485 [94·0%] of 7966 total events). 45 (0·3%) of 16 427 participants in the vaccine group and 23 (0·4%) of 5435 participants in the placebo group had serious adverse events; none were considered associated with vaccination, with confirmation from the independent data monitoring committee. Four deaths were reported during the study (three [

Ebola hemorrhagic fever, also known as Ebola virus disease or EVD, is one of the most dangerous viral diseases in humans and animals. In this open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial, we assessed the safety, side effects, and immunogenicity of a novel, heterologous prime-boost vaccine against Ebola, which was administered in 2 doses to 84 healthy adults of both sexes between 18 and 55 years. The vaccine consists of live-attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and adenovirus serotype-5 (Ad5) expressing Ebola envelope glycoprotein. The most common adverse event was pain at the injection site, although no serious adverse events were reported. The vaccine did not significantly impact blood, urine, and immune indices. Seroconversion rate was 100 %. Antigen-specific IgG geometric mean titer at day 42 was 3,277 (95 % confidence interval 2,401–4,473) in volunteers immunized at full dose. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in 93.1 % of volunteers immunized at full dose, with geometric mean titer 20. Antigen-specific response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was also detected in 100 % of participants, as well as in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in 82.8 % and 58.6 % of participants vaccinated at full dose, respectively. The data indicate that the vaccine is safe and induces strong humoral and cellular immune response in up to 100 % of healthy adult volunteers, and provide a rationale for testing efficacy in Phase III trials. Indeed, the strong immune response to the vaccine may elicit long-term protection. This trial was registered with grls.rosminzdrav.ru (No. 495*), and with zakupki.gov.ru (No. 0373100043215000055).

Summary Background We developed a heterologous COVID-19 vaccine consisting of two components, a recombinant adenovirus type 26 (rAd26) vector and a recombinant adenovirus type 5 (rAd5) vector, both carrying the gene for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike glycoprotein (rAd26-S and rAd5-S). We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of two formulations (frozen and lyophilised) of this vaccine. Methods We did two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies at two hospitals in Russia. We enrolled healthy adult volunteers (men and women) aged 18–60 years to both studies. In phase 1 of each study, we administered intramuscularly on day 0 either one dose of rAd26-S or one dose of rAd5-S and assessed the safety of the two components for 28 days. In phase 2 of the study, which began no earlier than 5 days after phase 1 vaccination, we administered intramuscularly a prime-boost vaccination, with rAd26-S given on day 0 and rAd5-S on day 21. Primary outcome measures were antigen-specific humoral immunity (SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies measured by ELISA on days 0, 14, 21, 28, and 42) and safety (number of participants with adverse events monitored throughout the study). Secondary outcome measures were antigen-specific cellular immunity (T-cell responses and interferon-γ concentration) and change in neutralising antibodies (detected with a SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation assay). These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04436471 and NCT04437875. Findings Between June 18 and Aug 3, 2020, we enrolled 76 participants to the two studies (38 in each study). In each study, nine volunteers received rAd26-S in phase 1, nine received rAd5-S in phase 1, and 20 received rAd26-S and rAd5-S in phase 2. Both vaccine formulations were safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were pain at injection site (44 [58%]), hyperthermia (38 [50%]), headache (32 [42%]), asthenia (21 [28%]), and muscle and joint pain (18 [24%]). Most adverse events were mild and no serious adverse events were detected. All participants produced antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein. At day 42, receptor binding domain-specific IgG titres were 14 703 with the frozen formulation and 11 143 with the lyophilised formulation, and neutralising antibodies were 49·25 with the frozen formulation and 45·95 with the lyophilised formulation, with a seroconversion rate of 100%. Cell-mediated responses were detected in all participants at day 28, with median cell proliferation of 2·5% CD4+ and 1·3% CD8+ with the frozen formulation, and a median cell proliferation of 1·3% CD4+ and 1·1% CD8+ with the lyophilised formulation. Interpretation The heterologous rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based COVID-19 vaccine has a good safety profile and induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses in participants. Further investigation is needed of the effectiveness of this vaccine for prevention of COVID-19. Funding Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.