Search

The aim of this poster is to provide an overview of the work carried out in the CLS INFRA project and its conclusions for the field of Computational Literary Studies.

This 3-hour workshop will introduce span categorization as a method for the machine-annotation of text for various research tasks in the digital humanities. Participants will gain a conceptual understanding of how span categorization differs from entity recognition and complete practical exercises to train a spaCy span categorizer on the LitBank dataset.

Humanistic NLP articulates the multiple challenges facing interactions between NLP and humanities research and offers solutions to bridge this gap. Not merely an application of NLP in DH, it should be considered as an opportunity to engage more humanist scholars in the development and critical appraisal of NLP language resources.

Book of Abstracts from the Digital Humanities Conference 2023, held from 10th to 14th July in Graz, Austria

Research assessment reform is crucial for the social sustainability of research infrastructures (RIs): RIs can only thrive in the long term if the researchers who contribute to their development and growth receive academic credit for the kind of work they do in and around research infrastructures. To put it bluntly, research infrastructures have a vested interest in supporting the reform of research assessment. But, conversely, ongoing attempts to reform research assessment can also benefit from the work of research infrastructures because RIs have a great deal of experience creating and maintaining public services for producing, curating and harvesting both traditional and non-traditional academic outputs. The goal of this paper is to outline DARIAH’s position on the importance of research assessment reform for thematic RIs and the importance of thematic RIs for research assessment reform at the European level.

ERICs (European Research Infrastructure Consortia) are European legal entities to facilitate the establishment and operation of Research Infrastructures with European interest. ERICs are increasingly asked to account for their operations (see debate on KPI in the ERIC Forum). At the same time, web services such as the EOSC Resource Catalogues, the SSH Open Marketplace, and OpenAire, provide possibilities to register and disseminate research outputs, making them ready for automatic harvesting. While the need for standardization of the description of ERIC provided services and content is still very much debated, there are also conceptual dimensions we would like to address in this paper. ERICs, by definition, create and operate in a landscape of distributed, co-created, network of processes. To summarize, services in the large domain of SSH, are increasingly ‘shared’ resources. In the spirit of Open Science and the further consolidation of the European Research Area, this interconnectedness can only be applauded. This is how the integrating function of ERICs materializes, and how we avoid the duplication of effort. At the same time, ERICs are also defined organizations with boundaries, and subject to individual assessments. To some extent ERICs are even in competition with each other, for visibility, user groups, in-kind contributions, funds allocated nationally and from the EC. This paper makes a first attempt to reflect about intrinsic challenges in accounting single nodes in a network of collaborating nodes. While each ERIC already defines its own policy of how to deal with this complexity according to their needs, there is a debate needed as to how to assess contributions to distributed infrastructures in a way which gives credit to all participating while at the same time avoid mis-allocation, double counting and so on, in particular in the context of the development of the EOSC. The matter of ethical, balanced, effective research assessment which has been discussed extensively in the realm of scholarly communication (Leiden Manifesto) also needs to be addressed in the area of research infrastructures. Such a reflection will inform the current discourse of further standardizing the metadata schema which are behind the different catalogues; the search for meaningful Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for ERICs and the further shaping of the collaboration and division of labor between ERIC’s at national and European level. This paper takes the current discourse around the DARIAH service portfolio as an example/case to highlight these more generic challenges. It also attempts to sort out various sources of ‘assignment uncertainty’ of contributions (e.g. differences in controlled vocabularies, incompatibilities of metadata schemes, user-generated content, metrics of assignments, and policy decisions). While we focus the discussion on ERICs, our motivation to present this at the DARIAH Annual event is that it might be of particular interest to see how cultural heritage institutions (libraries, archives, museums…), in their roles as content providers also for ERICs are credited for their contribution to ERICs, and beyond. References: Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L. et al. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520, 429–431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a See also http://www.leidenmanifesto.org

Computational Literary Studies Infrastructure, funded by the Horizon2020 grant scheme, is a four-year, pan-European project that aims to unify the diverse landscape of computational text analysis, in terms of available texts, tools, methods, practices and so forth, within its growing international user community. The project started out in February 2021, meaning that it has been underway for just over a year. In our poster we discuss the various deliverables and activities that have come out of the CLS INFRA project in its first quarter to give an idea of its impact in practice.&nbsp

This multi-authored report summarizes the results from a transnational questionnaire survey conducted in 2015 by a research team within the DARIAH-EU Digital Methods and Practices Observatory Working Group (DiMPO). The Introduction offers a background to the study in the context of digital humanities work and scholarly practices research. Chapter 1 introduces the methodology, methods, and research design of the study. Chapter 2 presents and discusses the descriptive statistical results of analysing the full dataset of 2,177 valid responses of researchers who reside in Europe and identify one of the human sciences as their primary discipline. It summarises respondent profiles, and findings related to use of research materials and digital access, digitally-enabled scholarly activities, methods and tools, digital publication and dissemination of research results, use of software and services, and respondent assessment of digital needs. Chapters 3 to 9 present a similar analysis for respondents from European countries that have yielded more than 100 valid responses, in the form of national profiles for Austria (Chapter 3), Finland (Chapter 4), Greece (Chapter 5), Lithuania (Chapter 6), Poland (Chapter 7), Serbia (Chapter 8), and Switzerland (Chapter 9). Finally, the study questionnaire is included as an Appendix. The report will hopefully provide a useful baseline for further, timely longitudinal research on the shifting practices and needs of European digitally-enabled researchers in the human sciences.

In this article, we present OntoDomLab-Med, a domain label ontology focused on medical and health sciences. We have developed a taxonomy from thelabels included in the list of abbreviations of the Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa Contemporânea of the Lisbon Academy of Sciences. Our goal is to connect OntoDomLab-Med to a set of selected entries from the dictionary which have been encoded in TEI Lex-0, a stricter and more suitable format than TEI for dictionary encoding, in line with the FAIR principles. The ontology, built with Protégé and represented in OWL, allows the knowledge to be exported using an interoperable exchange format, thereby enabling the ontology to be applied to different lexical resources and to various domains, regardless of the natural language being used. OntoDomLab-Med will be useful not only to research information by domain but it will also allow the lexicographer to be more consistent in his/her work as both researcher and coder of information for lexicographic purposes., Available here: https://es.calameo.com/read/0038662368a28c0171ff4

Applying terminological methods to lexicography helps lexicographers deal with the terms occurring in general language dictionaries, especially when it comes to writing the definitions of concepts belonging to special fields. In the context of the lexicographic work of the Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa, an updated digital version of the last Academia das Ciências de Lisboa’ dictionary published in 2001, we have assumed that terminology – in its dual dimension, both linguistic and conceptual – and lexicography are complementary in their methodological approaches. Both disciplines deal with lexical items, which can be lexical units or terms. In this paper, we apply terminological methods to improve the treatment of terms in general language dictionaries and to write definitions as a form of achieving more precision and accuracy, and also to specify the domains to which they belong. Additionally, we highlight the consistent modelling of lexicographic components, namely the hierarchy of domain labels, as they are term identification markers instead of a flat list of domains. The need to create and make available structured, organised and interoperable lexicographic resources has led us to follow a path in which the application of standards and best practices of treating and representing specialised lexicographic content are fundamental requirements.

Computational Literary Studies Infrastructure, funded by the Horizon2020 grant scheme, is a four-year, pan-European project that aims to unify the diverse landscape of computational text analysis, in terms of available texts, tools, methods, practices and so forth, within its growing international user community. The project started out in February 2021, meaning that it has been underway for just over a year. In our poster we discuss the various deliverables and activities that have come out of the CLS INFRA project in its first quarter to give an idea of its impact in practice.

Session Chairs: Toma Tasovac (DARIAH-EU, Belgrade Center for Digital Humanities), Vicky Garnett (DARIAH-EU, Trinity College Dublin) Speakers (in alphabetical order):Ricarda Braukmann (SSHOC, DANS-KNAW), Vicky Garnett (DARIAH-EU), Ellen Leenarts, (SSHOC, DANS-KNAW), Costas Papadopoulos (#dariahTeach/ Maastricht University), Marianne Ping-Huang (#dariahTeach/ Aarhus University), Susan Schreibman (#dariahTeach/ Maastricht University), Toma Tasovac (DARIAH-EU), Tatsiana Yankelevich (SSHOC, LIBER) Abstract This panel session will look at the experiences of three emerging and established training initiatives within the Digital Humanities Training sphere. Since 2015, the increase in training resources that address the needs of researchers, particularly in the area of research data management and train-the-trainer materials has grown considerably. Projects launched since the mid-2010s more and more have included training and education as strong components of their mission. Yet with this increase in training, education and skills development, where do these training initiatives see their training materials meeting the future needs of researchers, especially in the context of available interfaces, both for the creation and consumption of learning resources? And crucially, how has the Covid Pandemic changed the modalities of creating and making available learning content? The speakers in this panel will address these issues with a view to initiating a conversation about the development of virtual training interfaces for the 2020s and beyond. Finessing an interactive user-interface for DARIAH-Campus Vicky Garnett (DARIAH-EU) Toma Tasovac (DARIAH-EU) DARIAH-Campus was officially launched in December 2019. It was formulated as part of the DESIR project with the intention to provide a sustainable one-stop shop for existing training resources created within the DARIAH community, while also providing original training resources written by and for (digital) humanists at all career stages. One of the crucial elements of design for this platform was the ability for the creators of these resources to upload their content themselves via a GitHub repository, thus giving control of these resources back to the community. This interactive interface has become a unique selling point for DARIAH-Campus, but also a barrier to some users who are less tech-savvy. Focus within the team has shifted therefore to creating, testing and launching a dual-interface to support and enable different editorial workflows: one based on the GitHub workflow allowing direct submissions via GitHub, and a second with a Content Management System built on top of the GitHub workflow, making the process more user-friendly. This presentation will give an overview of the challenges and barriers DARIAH-Campus has faced in developing and finessing its user interface in the nearly 2 years since its launch. #dariahTeach: Multimodal Interfaces for Student-Centred Teaching/Learning Costas Papadopoulos (#dariahTeach/ Maastricht University) Marianne Ping-Huang (#dariahTeach/ Aarhus University) Susan Schreibman (#dariahTeach/ Maastricht University) This paper focuses on the interfaces developed for #dariahTeach (https://teach.dariah.eu/), the open-source, freely-available online platform for digital arts and humanities curriculum, with a particular focus on the courses that were recently released as part of the project IGNITE: Design Thinking & Making in the Arts and Sciences. These courses, developed specifically for Masters students, took a multimodal approach to course content, utilising videos, audio, timelines, slideshows, and interactive quizzes. They were utilised in both formal postgraduate educational programmes (in the Netherlands and Denmark), as well as in less formal workshops and summer schools during the lockdown. This presentation will discuss the interactive design cycle used to develop these courses, as well as the integration of what are considered more playful learning objects (videos, interactive quizzes) alongside more traditional assignments (e.g. articles and book chapters) for a virtual classroom experience. The presentation will reflect on the lessons learnt through focus groups, interviews, and surveys to utilising #dariahTeach both before and during Covid-induced virtual teaching. Interfaces to training and engagement for virtual training resources during COVID-19 – SSHOC Case Study Ellen Leenarts, SSHOC, DANS-KNAW Tatsiana Yankelevich SSHOC, LIBER Ricarda Braukmann SSHOC, DANS-KNAW The Social Sciences and Humanities Open Cloud (SSHOC) project aims to support and raise awareness of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). Within the project, a team of researchers are tasked with organising training events, and building a training network in Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), all with the purpose of raising awareness and supporting knowledge exchange in SSH and Open Science. The team has done this through the development of the SSH Training Discovery Toolkit, a curated train-the-trainer focussed collection of materials; and by establishing the SSH Training Community, which brings together more than 150 trainers in the field. They have also established workshops around Research Data Management, engaging virtual training, and evaluation, etc. Here in particular, the global pandemic forced the addition of another interface, as these workshops originally intended for face-to-face delivery were moved to the virtual space. This presentation will discuss the challenges SSHOC has faced in terms of metadata around training resources that are necessary for creating the SSH Training Discovery Toolkit interface, as well as how they overcame the challenges that moving training workshops from the real world to virtual space created. _____ These presentations were delivered at the DARIAH-EU Annual Event 'Interfaces', September 2021.&nbsp

International audience; MORDigital is a newly funded Portuguese lexicographical project that aims to produce highquality and searchable digital versions of the first three editions (1789; 1813; 1823) of the Diccionario da Lingua Portugueza by António de Morais Silva, preserving and making accessible this important work of European heritage. This paper will describe the current state of the art, the project, its objectives and the methodology proposed, the latter of which is based on a rigorous linguistic analysis and will also include steps necessary for the ontologisation of knowledge contained in and relating to the text. A section will be dedicated to the various investigation domains of the project description. The output of the project will be made available via a dedicated platform.

UID/LIN/03213/2013 MORDigital is a newly funded Portuguese lexicographic project that aims to produce high-quality and searchable digital versions of the first three editions (1789; 1813; 1823) of the Diccionario da Lingua Portugueza by António de Morais Silva, preserving and making accessible this important work of European heritage. This paper will describe the current state of the art, the project, its objectives and the methodology proposed, the latter of which is based on a rigorous linguistic analysis and will also include steps necessary for the ontologisation of knowledge contained in and relating to the text. A section will be dedicated to the various investigation domains of the project description. The output of the project will be made available via a dedicated platform. publishersversion published

These are the slides from the LIBER 2021 Keynote AddressDigital Libraries: The Next Frontier by Toma Tasovac. The keynote speech was moderated by Julien Roche, LIBER Vice-President, Chair of the LIBER Conference Programme Committee. Session description: The classical model of the library was both an archive and a temple. The library was a defense against decay and destruction, an institution that preserved not only a system of values but also certain rituals of using knowledge: the book as a physical object and, consequently, a model of text that is final and unchangeable. But electronic textuality has changed all that. We are not in Kansas anymore, and some rather pesky people among us -- generally referred to as digital humanists -- have developed a craving for digital collections in which a text or an image is not only an object but a service; not a static entity but an interactive method. Can libraries keep up with the instability and fluidity of infinitely enrichable digital objects? And should they? &nbsp

Dictionaries lie at the core of humanity’s ability to conceptualize, systematize and convey meaning. Indeed, a dictionary is many things at once: it is a text, a tool, a model of language, and a cultural artifact deeply embedded in the historical moment of its production [1]. The DARIAH Working Group Lexical Resources (DWGLR) has been established to help scholars create, transform and study dictionaries as digital objects. The activities of the DWGLR have been seminal in integrating and sustaining previous work on encoding dictionaries; improving the coverage of lexicographic data in the TEI Guidelines; propelling the scholarly debate around modeling lexicographic data; championing the importance of open standards to a new generation of scholars; and establishing TEI Lex-0 as an internationally recognized data interchange format. In recognition of these activities, the DWGLR was awarded the 2020 Rahtz Prize for TEI Ingenuity by the TEI Consortium.

How does technology impact research practices in the humanities? How does digitisation shape scholarly identity? How do we negotiate trust in the digital realm? What is scholarship, what forms can it take, and how does it acquire authority? This diverse set of essays demonstrate the importance of asking such questions, bringing together established and emerging scholars from a variety of disciplines, at a time when data is increasingly being incorporated as an input and output in humanities sources and publications. Major themes addressed include the changing nature of scholarly publishing in a digital age, the different kinds of ‘gate-keepers’ for scholarship, and the difficulties of effectively assessing the impact of digital resources. The essays bring theoretical and practical perspectives into conversation, offering readers not only comprehensive examinations of past and present discourse on digital scholarship, but tightly-focused case studies. This timely volume illuminates the different forces underlying the shifting practices in humanities research today, with especial focus on how humanists take ownership of, and are empowered by, technology in unexpected ways. Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research is essential reading for scholars, students, and general readers interested in the changing culture of research practices in the humanities, and in the future of the digital humanities on the whole.

Introduction: What’s in a Word? The word infrastructure carries the undeniable whiff of heavy engineering, of tar, and gear oil, all accompanied by the sound of a jackhammer. Looking in a dictionary, we will be reminded that infrastructure is basic and foundational, but also that its primary examples are, and remain (in the imagination, if not in reality) in the realm of bricks and mortar: roads, bridges, electricity grids. But the etymology of the word implies nothing of this sort, merely th...

The purpose of this paper is to compare and analyse the use of domain labels in three large scholarly dictionaries – Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa Contemporânea (DLPC), published in 2001 by the Academia das Ciências de Lisboa (ACL); the 23th online edition of Diccionario de la lengua española (DLE), published by Real Academia Española (RAE); and the 9th online edition of Dictionnaire de l’Académie Française (DAF), a work in progress – in order to a) highlight the commonalities and differences in their editorial practices and approaches to knowledge organisation; b) report on a mapping exercise for a particular domain (GEOLOGY) which can serve as a test case for establishing procedural rules for the alignment of domain labels in general language dictionaries. We show how “meta-labels” can be used to optimise the alignment of specialised senses in lexicographic works.

UIDB/03213/2020 UIDP/03213/2020 The modelling and encoding of polylexical units, i.e. recurrent sequences of lexemes that are perceived as independent lexical units, is a topic that has not been covered adequately and in sufficient depth by the Guidelines of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI), a de facto standard for the digital representation of textual resources in the scholarly research community. In this paper, we use the Dictionary of the Portuguese Academy of Sciences as a case study for presenting our ongoing work on encoding polylexical units using TEI Lex-0, an initiative aimed at simplifying and streamlining the encoding of lexical data with TEI in order to improve interoperability. We introduce the notion of macro- and microstructural relevance to differentiate between polylexicals that serve as headwords for their own independent dictionary entries and those which appear inside entries for different headwords. We develop the notion of lexicographic transparency to distinguish between those units which are not accompanied by an explicit definition and those that are: the former are encoded as –like constructs, whereas the latter becomes –like constructs, which can have further constraints imposed on them (sense numbers, domain labels, grammatical labels etc.). We codify the use of attributes on to encode different kinds of labels for polylexicals (implicit, explicit and normalised), concluding that the interoperability of lexical resources would be significantly improved if dictionary encoders would have access to an expressive but relatively simple typology of polylexical units. publishersversion published

This poster demonstrates the structure of DARIAH-Campus, including the Event Capture Tool, and the benefits of DARIAH-Campus for both students, and course-providers, offering examples of the four different learning resource types, and discussing how it contributes to the evolving DH pedagogical landscape by offering sustainability to training material developers while simultaneously providing training materials in a findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable manner.

Dans cet article, nous présentons OntoDomLab-Med, une ontologie des marques de domaines des sciences médicales et de la santé. Nous avons élaboré une taxonomie à partir des marques présentes dans la liste des abréviations du Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa Contemporânea de l’Académie des Sciences de Lisbonne. Notre objectif est de mettre en rapport OntoDomLab-Med et les entrées sélectionnées du dictionnaire balisées en TEI Lex-0 – système de balisage plus stricte et plus adapté que TEI au codage des dictionnaires – en ligne avec les principes FAIR. L’ontologie construite avec Protégé et codifiée en OWL permet l’exportation des connaissances dans un format d’échange interopérable permettant que l’ontologie puisse être appliquée à différentes ressources lexicales pour référencer les domaines indépendamment de la langue utilisée. OntoDomLab-Med sera utile non seulement pour rechercher de l’information par domaine, mais permettra au lexicographe d’être plus cohérent dans son travail de chercheur et de codeur de l’information à des fins lexicographiques.

UIDB/00749/2020 UIDP/00749/2020 In this article, we will introduce two of the new parts of the new multi-part version of the Lexical Markup Framework(LMF) ISO standard, namely Part 3 of the standard (ISO 24613-3), which deals with etymological and diachronic data, andPart 4 (ISO 24613-4), which consists of a TEI serialisation of all of the prior parts of the model. We will demonstrate the useof both standards by describing the LMF encoding of a small number of examples taken from a sample conversion of thereference Portuguese dictionaryGrande Dicion ́ario Houaiss da L ́ıngua Portuguesa, part of a broader experiment comprisingthe analysis of different, heterogeneously encoded, Portuguese lexical resources. We present the examples in the UnifiedModelling Language (UML) and also in a couple of cases in TEI. publishersversion published

International audience; DARIAH, the digital humanities infrastructure with origins and an organisational home in Europe, is nearing the completion of its implementation phase. The significant investment from the European Commission and member countries has yielded a robust set of technical and social infrastructures, ranging from working groups, various registries, pedagogical materials, and software to support diverse approaches to digital humanities scholarship. While the funding and leadership of DARIAH to date has come from countries in, or contiguous with, Europe, the needs that drive its technical and social development are widely shared within the international digital humanities community beyond Europe. Scholars on every continent would benefit from well-supported technical tools and platforms, directories for facilitating access to information and resources, and support for working groups.The DARIAH Beyond Europe workshop series, organised and financed under the umbrella of the DESIR project (“DARIAH ERIC Sustainability Refined,” 2017–2019, funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program), convened three meetings between September 2018 and March 2019 in the United States and Australia. These workshops served as fora for cross-cultural exchange, and introduced many non-European DH scholars to DARIAH; each of the workshops included a significant delegation from various DARIAH bodies, together with a larger number of local presenters and participants. The local contexts for these workshops were significantly different in their embodiment of research infrastructures: on the one hand, in the U.S., a private research university (Stanford) and the de facto national library (the Library of Congress), both in a country with a history of unsuccessful national-scale infrastructure efforts; and in Australia, a system which has invested substantially more in coordinated national research infrastructure in science and technology, but very little on a national scale in the humanities and arts. Europe is in many respects ahead of both host countries in terms of its research infrastructure ecosystem both at the national and pan-European levels.The Stanford workshop had four main topics of focus: corpus management; text and image analysis; geohumanities; and music, theatre, and sound studies. As the first of the workshops, the Stanford group also took the lead in proposing next steps toward exploring actionable “DARIAH beyond Europe” initiatives, including the beginnings of a blog shared among participants from all the workshops, extra-European use of DARIAH’s DH Course Registry, and non-European participation in DARIAH Working Groups.The overall theme of the Library of Congress workshop was “Collections as Data,” building on a number of U.S.-based initiatives exploring how to enhance researcher engagement with digital collections through computationally-driven research. In Washington, D.C., the knowledge exchange sessions focussed on digitised newspapers and text analysis, infrastructural challenges for public humanities, and the use of web-archives in DH research. As at Stanford, interconnecting with DARIAH Working Groups was of core interest to participants, and a new Working Group was proposed to explore global access and use of digitised historical newspapers. A further important outcome was the agreement to explore collaboration between the U.S.-based “Collections as Data” initiatives and the Heritage Data Reuse Charter in Europe. The third and final workshop in the series took place in March 2019 in Australia, hosted by the National Library of Australia in Canberra. Convened by the Australian Academy of the Humanities (AAH), together with the Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) and DARIAH, this event was co-located with the Academy’s second annual Humanities, Arts and Culture Data Summit. The first day of the event, targeted at research leadership and policy makers, was intended to explore new horizons for data-driven humanities and arts research, digital cultural collections and research infrastructure. The two subsequent days focused on engaging with a wide variety of communities, including (digital) humanities researchers and cultural heritage professionals. Organised around a series of Knowledge Exchange Sessions, combined with research-led lightning talks, the participants spoke in detail about how big ideas can be implemented practically on the ground. This poster reflects on the key outcomes and future directions arising from these three workshops, and considers what it might look like for DARIAH to be adopted as a fundamental DH infrastructure in a complex variety of international, national, and regional contexts, with diverse funding models, resources, needs, and expectations. One major outcome of all workshops was the shared recognition that, in spite of extensive funding, planning, and goodwill, these workshops were not nearly global enough in their reach: most importantly they were not inclusive of the Global South. Our new DARIAH beyond Europe community has a strong shared commitment to address this gap.

International audience; Achieving consistent encoding within a given community of practice has been a recurrent issue for the TEI Guidelines. The topic is of particular importance for lexical data if we think of the potential wealth of content we could gain from pooling together the information available in the variety of highly structured, historical and contemporary lexical resources. Still, the encoding possibilities offered by the Dictionaries Chapter in the Guidelines are too numerous and too flexible to guarantee sufficient interoperability and a coherent model for searching, visualising or enriching multiple lexical resources.Following the spirit of TEI Analytics [Zillig, 2009], developed in the context of the MONK project, TEI Lex-0 aims at establishing a target format to facilitate the interoperability of heterogeneously encoded lexical resources. This is important both in the context of building lexical infrastructures as such [Ermolaev and Tasovac, 2012] and in the context of developing generic TEI-aware tools such as dictionary viewers and profilers. The format itself should not necessarily be one which is used for editing or managing individual resources, but one to which they can be univocally transformed to be queried, visualised, or mined in a uniform way. We are also aiming to stay as aligned as possible with the TEI subset developed in conjunction with the revision of the ISO LMF (Lexical Markup Framework) standard so that coherent design guidelines can be provided to the community (cf. [Romary, 2015]).The paper will provide an overview of the various domains covered by TEI Lex- 0 and the main decisions that were taken over the last 18 months: constraining the general structure of a lexical entry; offering mechanisms to overcome the limits of when used in retro-digitized dictionaries (by allowing, for instance, and as children of ); systematizing the representation of morpho-syntactic information [Bański et al., 2017]; providing a strict -based encoding of sense-related information; deprecating ; dealing with internal and external references in dictionary entries, providing more advanced encodings of etymology (see submission by Bowers, Herold and Romary); as well as defining technical constraints on the systematic use of @xml:id at different levels of the dictionary microstructure. The activity of the group has already lead to changes in the Guidelines in response to specific GitHub tickets.

Die europäische Umfrage zu wissenschaftlichen Praktiken und digitalen Bedürfnissen in den Geisteswissenschaften ist das Produkt eines kollaborativen Unterfangens europäischer Forschender, die mit der DiMPOArbeitsgruppe zusammenarbeiten. Sie wurde als überregionale Längsschnittstudie konzipiert, die in einem europäischen Rahmen nach einigen Jahren jeweils wiederholt werden soll. Ziel der Studie ist es, einen evidenzbasierten Ausblick über wissenschaftliche Praktiken sowie die Bedürfnisse und Einstellungen europäischer DH-Forschender zu digitalen Ressourcen, Methoden und Werkzeuge zu geben. Die Ergebnisse der ersten Studie (März 2015 abgeschlossen) werden in einem von mehreren Autoren und Autorinnen verfassten Bericht zusammengetragen, der vergleichende und konsolidierte Analysen sowie sechs Länderprofile enthält. Eine neue Erhebung ist für 2017/18 geplant. Weitere Informationen: bit.ly/scholarlypractices Deutsche Übersetzung: Beat Immenhauser (Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften) ---------------- The highlights of the European survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanities carried out by DARIAH Digital Methods and Practices Observatory WG (DiMPO). This research is the outcome of collaborative work of European researchers from different countries, working within the DiMPO Working Group. It has been designed as a multiregional longitudinal survey, to be conducted online across European countries and to be repeated every few years. Its aim is to provide an evidence-based outlook of scholarly practices, needs and attitudes of European humanities researchers towards digital resources, methods and tools across space and time. Results of the first run of the survey (completed in March 2015) are presented in a multi-authored report, which includes comparative and consolidated analyses, as well as five country profiles. A new run is planned for 2017-18. For more information, see bit.ly/scholarlypractices. German translation: Beat Immenhauser (Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences)

Najważniejsze wyniki europejskiegosondażu praktyk badawczych oraz potrzeb cyfrowych w humanistyce i naukach o sztuce, przeprowadzonego przez grupę roboczą DARIAH Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO). Badanie jest efektem współpracy europejskich badaczy z różnych krajów w ramach Grupy Roboczej DiMPO. Badanie zostało pomyślana jako ponadregionalny sondaż podłużny, przeprowadzany co kilka lat online w krajach europejskich. Jego celem jest dostarczenie opartego na danych przeglądu praktyk badawczych, potrzeb i postaw europejskich badaczy z nauk humanistycznych wobec zasobów cyfrowych, metod i narzędzi, w perspektywie przestrzennej i czasowej. Wyniki pierwszego sondażu (zakończonego w marcu 2015) zostaną zaprezentowane w wieloautorskim raporcie, który zawiera analizy zbiorcze i porównawcze oraz pięć raportów narodowych. Kolejne badanie planowane jest na 2017-2018. Więcej informacji: bit.ly/scholarlypractices Przekład na polski: Maciej Maryl (Centrum Humanistyki Cyfrowej Instytutu Badań Literackich PAN) ------ The highlights of the European survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanities carried out by DARIAH Digital Methods and Practices Observatory WG (DiMPO). This research is the outcome of collaborative work of European researchers from different countries, working within the DiMPO Working Group. It has been designed as a multiregional longitudinal survey, to be conducted online across European countries and to be repeated every few years. Its aim is to provide an evidence-based outlook of scholarly practices, needs and attitudes of European humanities researchers towards digital resources, methods and tools across space and time. Results of the first run of the survey (completed in March 2015) are presented in a multi-authored report, which includes comparative and consolidated analyses, as well as five country profiles. A new run is planned for 2017-18. For more information, see bit.ly/scholarlypractices. Polish translation: Maciej Maryl (Digital Humanities Centre at the Institute of Literary Research, Polish Academy of Sciences)

A single abstract from the DHd-2018 Book of Abstracts., Sofern eine editorische Arbeit an dieser Publikation stattgefunden hat, dann bestand diese aus der Eliminierung von Bindestrichen in Überschriften, die aufgrund fehlerhafter Silbentrennung entstanden sind, der Vereinheitlichung von Namen der Autor*innen in das Schema "Nachname, Vorname" und/oder der Trennung von Überschrift und Unterüberschrift durch die Setzung eines Punktes, sofern notwendig., {"references":["https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3684897","https://github.com/DHd-Verband/DHd-Abstracts-2018"]}

Este informe resume el análisis estadístico de los resultados de una encuesta online que ha sido llevada a cabo por el Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO), un grupo de trabajo del VCC2 de la infraestructura de investigación DARIAH (Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities).Para proporcionar resultados basados en evidencias reales y actualizadas sobre las prácticas que se están desarrollando actualmente, así como las necesidades y actitudes de los investigadores europeos que implican el uso del entorno digital, esta encuesta se ha llevado a cabo gracias a un grupo internacional de investigadores de más de una docena de países, y se ha realizado centrándose en analizar las prácticas, actitudes y necesidades del mundo digital en la investigación en Europa a través de diferentes disciplinas de artes y humanidades y sus contextos de aplicación.

This report summarizes the statistical analysis of the findings of a web-based survey conducted by the Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO), a working group under VCC2 of the DARIAH research infrastructure (Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities).In order to provide an evidence-based, up-to-date, and meaningful account of the emerging information practices, needs and attitudes of arts and humanities researchers in the evolving European digital scholarly environment, the web survey involved a transnational team of researchers from more than a dozen countries, and addressed digitally-enabled research practices, attitudes and needs in all areas of Europe and across different arts and humanities disciplines and contexts.

Najważniejsze wyniki europejskiego sondażu praktyk badawczych oraz potrzeb cyfrowych w humanistyce i naukach o sztuce, przeprowadzonego przez grupę roboczą DARIAH Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO). Badanie jest efektem współpracy europejskich badaczy z różnych krajów w ramach Grupy Roboczej DiMPO. Badanie zostało pomyślana jako ponadregionalny sondaż podłużny, przeprowadzany co kilka lat online w krajach europejskich. Jego celem jest dostarczenie opartego na danych przeglądu praktyk badawczych, potrzeb i postaw europejskich badaczy z nauk humanistycznych wobec zasobów cyfrowych, metod i narzędzi, w perspektywie przestrzennej i czasowej. Wyniki pierwszego sondażu (zakończonego w marcu 2015) zostaną zaprezentowane w wieloautorskim raporcie, który zawiera analizy zbiorcze i porównawcze oraz pięć raportów narodowych. Kolejne badanie planowane jest na 2017-2018. Więcej informacji: bit.ly/scholarlypracticesPrzekład na polski: Maciej Maryl (Centrum Humanistyki Cyfrowej Instytutu Badań Literackich PAN)

Este informe resume el análisis estadístico de los resultados de una encuesta online que ha sido llevada a cabo por el Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO), un grupo de trabajo del VCC2 de la infraestructura de investigación DARIAH (Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities). Para proporcionar resultados basados en evidencias reales y actualizadas sobre las prácticas que se están desarrollando actualmente, así como las necesidades y actitudes de los investigadores europeos que implican el uso del entorno digital, esta encuesta se ha llevado a cabo gracias a un grupo internacional de investigadores de más de una docena de países, y se ha realizado centrándose en analizar las prácticas, actitudes y necesidades del mundo digital en la investigación en Europa a través de diferentes disciplinas de artes y humanidades y sus contextos de aplicación.

This report summarizes the statistical analysis of the findings of a web-based survey conducted by the Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO), a working group under VCC2 of the DARIAH research infrastructure (Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities).\ud \ud In order to provide an evidence-based, up-to-date, and meaningful account of the emerging information practices, needs and attitudes of arts and humanities researchers in the evolving European digital scholarly environment, the web survey involved a transnational team of researchers from more than a dozen countries, and addressed digitally-enabled research practices, attitudes and needs in all areas of Europe and across different arts and humanities disciplines and contexts.

This report summarizes the statistical analysis of the findings of a web-based survey conducted by the Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO), a working group under VCC2 of the DARIAH research infrastructure (Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities). In order to provide an evidence-based, up-to-date, and meaningful account of the emerging information practices, needs and attitudes of arts and humanities researchers in the evolving European digital scholarly environment, the web survey involved a transnational team of researchers from more than a dozen countries, and addressed digitally-enabled research practices, attitudes and needs in all areas of Europe and across different arts and humanities disciplines and contexts.