Search

Femoral neck fractures in patients 55 years or younger, although relatively uncommon, may cause considerable surgeon stress because they may be thought to be surgical emergencies and are difficult to manage, resulting in serious complications. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the optimal timing for, the reduction options and techniques for, the fixation options for, and the results of surgical management of femoral neck fractures in patients 55 years or younger. The optimal timing of the surgical management of femoral neck fractures in these patients is a subject of debate. Anatomic reduction, which correlates with patient outcomes, is the goal in the management of femoral neck fractures whether it is attained via open or closed means. Multiple surgical approaches, including the Watson-Jones, Smith-Petersen, and Hueter approaches, may be used for the open reduction of femoral neck fractures. Multiple options are available for fixation, with cannulated screws and the compression hip screw most used in the literature. These implants should provide torsional stability, minimal bone loss, and a length-stable construct. Currently, no ideal implant exists. The outcomes of young patients with a femoral neck fracture who undergo surgical treatment depend more on fracture type, fracture reduction, and stable fixation than early surgical management; however, surgical management should not be excessively delayed.

Purpose To determine the prevalence of ipsilateral sacroiliac (SI) joint disease among patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) associated with labral ossification (LO) who underwent hip arthroscopy compared with a matched control group of patients with symptomatic FAI and no LO. Methods Computed tomography (CT) scans of all patients undergoing arthroscopic correction of FAI were obtained. The inclusion criterion for the study group was a diagnosis of FAI with a secondary diagnosis of LO made by plain radiography, CT, or magnetic resonance imaging or made intraoperatively. The exclusion criterion was the absence of evidence of LO. We reviewed 52 patients (56 hips) with LO to assess the SI joint and compared them with a control group matched by age, sex, and FAI type. The SI joints were graded according to the modified New York criteria. Results CT scans were available for evaluation of the ipsilateral SI joint in 28 patients (29 hips) with LO: 17 women and 11 men with an average age of 44.6 years (range, 26-56 years). Of the hips, 23 had combined FAI and 6 had pincer-type FAI. The control group consisted of 29 hips, exactly matched for sex and FAI type, with an average age of 44.8 years (range, 21-58 years). Grade 3 SI joint abnormalities were significantly more prevalent in the LO group (28%) than in the control group (7%, P = .037), and grade 0 or 1 changes (relatively normal SI joints) were significantly less common in patients with LO (38%) than in controls (72%, P = .008). Subanalysis showed that 35% of the LO group aged 45 years or younger had ipsilateral grade 3 SI joint abnormalities compared with none of the control patients aged 45 years or younger (P = .041). Grade 3 changes were found in 42% of male patients with LO compared with 8% of male controls (P = .155). Grade 3 changes were noted in 18% of women in the LO group compared with 6% of female controls (P = .601). Conclusions Patients with symptomatic FAI and LO are more likely to show associated SI joint pathology than patients with FAI not involving LO. These differences are greatest among men and among patients aged 45 years or younger. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Background context The Morel-Lavallee lesion occurs from a compression and shear force that usually separates the skin and subcutaneous tissue from the underlying muscular fascia. A dead space is created that becomes filled with blood, liquefied fat, and lymphatic fluid from the shearing of vasculature and lymphatics. If not treated appropriately, these lesions can become infected, cause tissue necrosis, or form chronic seromas. Purpose To review appropriate identification and treatment of Morel-Lavallee lesions in spinopelvic dissociation patients. Study design Uncontrolled case series. Methods Retrospective review of medical records. No funding was received in support of this study. The authors report no conflicts of interest. Results We present four cases of patients with traumatic spinopelvic dissociation. All had concomitant lumbosacral Morel-Lavallee lesions. All four trauma patients suffered traumatic spinopelvic dissociation with concomitant lumbosacral Morel-Lavallee lesions. Appropriate treatment included irrigation and debridement, drainage, antibiotics, and vacuum-assisted wound closure. Conclusions Our series reflects an association of Morel-Lavallee lesion in spinopelvic dissociation trauma patients. Possibly, the rotatory injury that occurs at the spinopelvic junction creates a shear force to form the Morel-Lavallee lesion. When presented with a spinopelvic dissociation patient, one should be prepared to treat a Morel-Lavallee lesion.

The management of some orthopaedic extremity injuries has changed over the past decade because of changing resource availability and the risks of complications. It is helpful to review the current literature regarding orthopaedic extremity emergencies and urgencies. The effects of the techniques of damage control orthopaedic techniques and the concept of the orthopaedic trauma room have also affected the management of these injuries. The available literature indicates that the remaining true orthopaedic extremity emergencies include compartment syndrome and vascular injuries associated with fractures and dislocations. Orthopaedic urgencies include open fracture management, femoral neck fractures in young patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation, and talus fractures that are open or those with impending skin compromise. Deciding when the definitive management of orthopaedic extremity injuries will occur has evolved as the concept of damage control orthopaedics has become more commonly accepted. Patient survival rates have improved with current resuscitative protocols. Definitive fixation of extremity injuries should be delayed until the patient's physiologic and extremity soft-tissue status allows for appropriate definitive management while minimizing the risks of complications. In patients with semiurgent orthopaedic injuries, the use of an orthopaedic trauma room has led to more efficient care of patients, fewer complications, and better time management for surgeons who perform on-call service for patients with traumatic orthopaedic injuries.

Fragility fractures of the pelvis are common and the incidence is increasing with the aging population. The primary risk factor is osteoporosis. Diagnosis is challenging and advanced imaging with computed tomography (CT), bone scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful. These injuries result in significant morbidity, including prolonged hospitalization, immobility, and loss of autonomy in previously active patients. The mortality rate is high, similar to hip fracture patients. This problem is underappreciated and deserves attention. An opportunity exists to improve outcomes with medical and surgical management.

For decades, the basic tenets of managing displaced femoral neck fractures have not changed, but the optimal treatment choice continues to be highly debated. The contemporary controversies associated with the treatment principles of displaced femoral neck fractures are distinct between young and old patients and are considered individually in this article about the current evidence. Although fixation constructs all seem to have similar complication rates, there is increasing evidence suggesting that total hip replacement improves patient functional outcomes for healthy, independent, elderly patients compared with hemiarthroplasty and should be considered as the treatment of choice for these patients.

Summary:Femoral neck fractures account for half of all hip fractures with a rapidly increasing incidence. Since they are associated with high mortality, decrease in quality of life, and high total costs, much research on the optimal treatment of these fractures has been undertaken. In this article

SUMMARYFemoroacetabular impingement is a cause of groin pain, which frequently afflicts young, active patients. Patients with irregularities in the morphology of the proximal femoral head–neck junction are at risk for developing impingement of the acetabular labrum. Furthermore, the cam effect cause

Defining pathologic widening of the pubic symphysis in the pediatric population continues to be a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study is to define a normal range of pubic symphyseal widths in various age and gender groups using axial computerized tomography (CT) scans.Axial CT images of 140 patients aged between 2 years and 15 years were obtained from our database of preexisting scans. Using a commercially available software package, the single image with the narrowest pubic symphyseal width was identified and measured. Patients were further stratified based on gender and by age into three groups: group A (age 2-5 years), group B (age 6-11 years), and group C (age 12-15 years).The mean width ± 95% confidence interval for all cases was 4.59 mm ± 0.18 mm. The mean width for male and female patients was 4.86 mm ± 0.26 mm and 4.33 mm ± 0.24 mm, respectively. Based on the two-way analysis of variance, both age group and gender had a statistically significant effect. Post hoc testing demonstrated a statistically significant difference in mean symphyseal width between groups A and C (p0.0001) and groups B and C (p = 0.0025) but not between groups A and B (p = 0.055). When grouped by age, the mean male pubic symphyseal width was found to be 5.10 mm, 4.93 mm, and 4.45 mm, while the mean female width was found to be 4.94 mm, 4.33 mm, and 3.54 mm at 2 to 6 years, 7 to 11 years, and 12 to 15 years of age, respectively.In the pediatric population, males seem to have a wider pubic symphysis than females of the same age group. In both males and females, pubic symphyseal width decreases during the transition from infancy toward skeletal maturity.Epidemiologic study, level III.

The optimal management strategy for femoral neck fractures remains highly debated. The femoral neck is intracapsular and the vascular supply is fragile. Furthermore, the curvature of the proximal femur results in high mechanical stresses through the femoral neck. Poor outcomes of nonunion and avascular necrosis (AVN) are common. This chapter reviews the current evidence with respect to the treatment principles of femoral neck fractures in two distinct patient populations: “young” and “old.” Contemporary controversies including surgical timing, choice of implant, arthroplasty options, nonoperative management, capsulotomy, and associated complications will be discussed.

Using a prospective database of 1309 displaced acetabular fractures gathered between 1980 and 2007, we calculated the annual mean age and annual incidence of elderly patients > 60 years of age presenting with these injuries. We compared the clinical details and patterns of fracture between patients > 60 years of age (study group) with those < 60 years (control group). We performed a detailed evaluation of the radiographs of the older group to determine the incidence of radiological characteristics which have been previously described as being associated with a poor patient outcome. In all, 235 patients were > 60 years of age and the remaining 1074 were < 60 years. The incidence of elderly patients with acetabular fractures increased by 2.4-fold between the first half of the study period and the second half (10% (62) vs 24% (174), p < 0.001). Fractures characterised by displacement of the anterior column were significantly more common in the elderly compared with the younger patients (64% (150) vs 43% (462), respectively, p < 0.001). Common radiological features of the fractures in the study group included a separate quadrilateral-plate component (50.8% (58)) and roof impaction (40% (46)) in the anterior fractures, and comminution (44% (30)) and marginal impaction (38% (26)) in posterior-wall fractures. The proportion of elderly patients presenting with acetabular fractures increased during the 27-year period. The older patients had a different distribution of fracture pattern than the younger patients, and often had radiological features which have been shown in other studies to be predictive of a poor outcome.

We aimed to identify variables associated with clinical and radiological outcome following fractures of the acetabulum associated with posterior dislocation of the hip. Using a prospective database of 1076 such fractures, we identified 109 patients with this combined injury managed operatively within three weeks and followed up for two or more years. The patients had a mean age of 42 years (15 to 79), 78 (72%) were male, and 84 (77%) had been involved in motor vehicle accidents. Using multivariate analysis the quality of reduction of the fracture was identified as the only significant predictor of radiological grade, clinical function and the development of post-traumatic arthritis (p < 0.001). All patients lacking anatomical reduction developed arthritis whereas only 25.5% (24 patients) with an anatomical reduction did so (p = 0.05). The quality of the reduction of the fracture is the most important variable in forecasting the outcome for patients with this injury. The interval to reduction of the dislocation of the hip may be less important than previously described.

Evidence-based medicine in orthopaedic surgery comprises predominantly observational studies. While the gold standard of study methodology is considered to be randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies provide valuable information regarding disease prevalence and etiology, rare outcomes, and adverse treatment effects. Orthopaedic surgeons care for many diseases and injuries that are rare and will likely never be the subject of an RCT. Given the bias to which observational studies are prone, however, transparent reporting is imperative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement is a checklist of items that can help clinician-scientists to improve the transparency with which observational studies are reported. We offer the following guidelines and examples for how the STROBE statement can be applied to reporting observational studies in orthopaedic surgery. Observational studies inform clinicians about disease etiology, natural history, prognostic factors, and treatment effectiveness1,2. The most common observational study designs include cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. In a cohort study, subjects are divided into two groups, or cohorts: those with an exposure of interest and those without. The groups are then followed prospectively and are observed for an outcome of interest. In a case-control study, subjects who have experienced an outcome (cases) are matched with subjects who have not experienced an outcome (controls). The two groups are then studied retrospectively to determine a causal relationship between unmatched risk factors and the outcome of interest. In a cross-sectional study, each subject in a population is evaluated at a single point in time, often to calculate the prevalence of disease or to establish an association between risk factors and outcome. Observational studies, specifically, case series, predominate the surgical literature in both general surgery (46%) and orthopaedic surgery (88%)2-4. One reason for the high prevalence of observational studies …