Search

Background: Rapid steroid withdrawal (RSW) is used increasingly in kidney transplantation but long-term outcomes in African-American (AA) recipients are not well known. We compared 1 and 5 year transplant outcomes in a large cohort of AA patients who were maintained on continued steroid therapy (CST) to those who underwent RSW., Methods: Post-transplant courses of A as receiving kidney allografts from 2003-2011 at two urban transplant centers in Chicago were followed. Prior to outcome analysis, we used Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW) to match the two groups on a set of baseline risk factors. Graft and patient survival, GFR at 1 and 5 years, incidence and type of rejection, incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), delayed graft function, CMV and BK viremia were compared., Results: There were 150 AA recipients in the CST analytic group and 157 in the RSW analytic group. Graft and patient survival was similar between the two groups. Rates of CMV viremia were higher in the RSW compared to the CST analytic group at 1 year. Biopsy-proven acute rejection and PTDM were similar between the RSW and CST groups., Conclusions: In AA recipients, RSW has similar long-term outcomes to CST.

Accurate assessment of kidney function by measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential to the risk assessment of prospective living kidney donors. We evaluated the performance of various estimating equations for creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault), GFR (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration), and 24-hour urine collections for creatinine clearance in obese potential kidney donors. We evaluated 164 potential kidney donors including 49 with a BMI of 30-35 and 32 with a BMI >35 that have completed a routine living donor evaluation with a measured GFR. All the estimating equations performed poorly in obese donors. While 24-hour urine collections performed better, only 15% had an adequate 24-hour urine collection. Since obese kidney donors may be at higher than average risk for kidney failure, accurate assessment of kidney function in these donors is crucial to ensure their long-term health postdonation.

Chronic Hepatitis C (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. Renal transplantation confers a survival advantage in HCV-infected patients. Renal transplant candidates with serologic evidence of HCV infection should undergo a liver biopsy to assess for fibrosis and cirrhosis. Patients with Metavir fibrosis score ≤3 and compensated cirrhosis should be evaluated for interferon-based therapy. Achievement of sustained virological response (SVR) may reduce the risks for both posttransplantation hepatic and extrahepatic complications such as de novo or recurrent glomerulonephritis associated with HCV. Patients who cannot achieve SVR and have no live kidney donor may be considered for HCV-positive kidneys. Interferon should be avoided after kidney transplant except for treatment of life-threatening liver injury, such as fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Early detection, prevention, and treatment of complications due to chronic HCV infection may improve the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with chronic HCV infection.

Anti-graft antibodies are often associated with graft rejection. Under special conditions, grafts continue to function normally even in the presence of anti-graft antibodies and complement. This condition is termed accommodation. We developed a xenograft accommodation model in which baby Lewis rat hearts are transplanted into Rag/GT-deficient mice, and accommodation is induced by repeated i.v. injections of low-dose anti-alpha-Gal IgG(1). The accommodated grafts survived a bolus dose of anti-alpha-Gal IgG(1), while freshly transplanted second grafts were rejected. To study the mechanism of anti-alpha-Gal IgG(1)-mediated accommodation, both real-time PCR and immunohistochemical staining revealed elevated expression of DAF, Crry and CD59 in the accommodated grafts. In vitro exposure of rat endothelial cells to anti-alpha-Gal IgG(1) also induced the up-regulation of DAF, Crry and CD59, as revealed by Western blot analyses, and was associated with an acquired resistance to antibody and complement-mediated lysis in vitro. Collectively, these studies suggest that the up-regulation of complement regulatory proteins may abrogate complement-mediated rejection and permit the development of xenograft accommodation.

The introduction of several immunosuppressive agents over the past decade has reduced the rate of acute rejection significantly and has improved short-term renal allograft survival. However, their impact on long-term outcomes remains unclear. Current immunosuppressive strategies are focused on improving long-term graft and patient survival along with maintaining allograft function. The approval of the new immunosuppressive agents: rabbit antithymocyte globulin, basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and sirolimus, also has facilitated the development of steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in kidney transplantation. We discuss the impact of various immunosuppressive regimens on the outcome measures of kidney transplantation: acute rejection episodes, allograft survival, and renal function.

Background: Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is an effective anticoagulant for patients who have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Anticoagulation is usually required for renal replacement therapy (RRT)., Objective: To prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of argatroban during RRT in hospitalized patients with or at risk for HIT., Methods: Five patients with known or suspected HIT underwent hemodialysis (n = 4) or continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH, n = 1), while receiving a continuous infusion of argatroban 0.5-2 microg/kg/min. Activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs), activated clotting times (ACTs), argatroban concentrations (plasma, dialysate, CVVH effluent), and safety were assessed before, during, and after a 4-hour session of RRT. Systemic and dialytic argatroban clearances were calculated., Results: Among the 4 hemodialysis patients, aPTT, ACT, and plasma argatroban concentrations remained stable during RRT, with respective mean +/- SD values of 74.3 +/- 34.2 seconds, 198 +/- 23 seconds, and 499 +/- 353 ng/mL before RRT, and 70.6 +/- 21.4 seconds, 181 +/- 12 seconds, and 453 +/- 295 ng/mL 2 hours after starting RRT (p values NS). Systemic clearance was 17.7 +/- 12.8 L/h before hemodialysis and 17.0 +/- 9.5 L/h during hemodialysis (n = 2). The dialyzer clearance (dialysate recovery method) was 1.5 +/- 0.4 L/h (n = 4). Generally similar responses occurred in the CVVH patient: systemic argatroban clearance was 4.8 L/h before CVVH and 4 L/h during CVVH. The hemofilter argatroban clearance was 0.9 L/h. No bleeding or thrombosis occurred., Conclusions: Argatroban provides effective alternative anticoagulation in patients with or at risk for HIT during RRT. Argatroban clearance by high-flux membranes during hemodialysis and CVVH is clinically insignificant, necessitating no dose adjustment.

Perioperative acute renal failure (ARF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients undergoing cardiac, vascular and major abdominal surgery and those with pre-operative renal insufficiency are at increased risk for developing post-operative ARF. The aetiologies of perioperative ARF are multi-factorial. However, pre-renal azotaemia and ischaemic acute tubular necrosis (ATN) are the predominant causes. Preventive strategies involve identifying patients at risk, optimizing intravascular volume as well as renal function with perioperative haemodynamic monitoring, and avoiding nephrotoxins. Various pharmacological agents have been used to optimize renal perfusion and tubular function. Unfortunately, none has been shown to be effective in randomized placebo-controlled trials. In this chapter, we discuss the prophylactic use of fluids, vasoactive drugs, diuretics and other agents, as well as modification of surgical techniques to reduce the incidence of perioperative ARF.

The increased incidence of vascular access thrombosis (VAT) associated with recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) therapy is multifactorial and controversial. Sixty-three hemodialysis patients who received > or = 12 weeks of r-HuEPO therapy were prospectively followed for the incidence of VAT. Those who experienced VAT (Group 1) were compared with those who did not (Group 2). The patients initially received r-HuEPO 50 U/kg intravenously three times a week. The dose was adjusted for a target hematocrit (t-Hct) of 30-33%. Twenty-five of the 63 patients (40%) experienced VAT (Group 1). These patients were older (mean, 54.0 +/- 14.0 years versus 47.3 +/- 15.0 years, p = 0.08). There was no difference between Groups 1 and 2 with respect to the baseline Hct level (21.5 +/- 2.9% versus 21.4 +/- 4.3%), the number of patients who achieved t-Hct (20 versus 28), and the mean time to reach t-Hct (18.6 +/- 15.1 weeks versus 16.9 +/- 16.2 weeks). However, 20 of 25 Group 1 patients (80%) were diabetic compared with only 18 of 38 Group 2 patients (47%, p = 0.0169, by Fisher's exact test). In addition, the types of vascular access differed markedly between the two groups: arteriovenous (AV) grafts/AV fistulae/Permcaths, Group 1: 21/3/1 versus Group 2: 15/21/2, p = 0.0018. It was concluded that the occurrence of VAT in r-HuEPO treated patients was not related to the patient's hematologic response to the drug, but rather, it depended upon the integrity of the patient's vasculature and the type of vascular access used.

This report evaluates the incidence of clinically significant HSV infection among 23 renal allograft recipients receiving OKT3 for treatment of steroid- or ALG-resistant acute rejection. No HSV infections occurred among the five HSV seronegative patients studied; three of 11 HSV seropositive patients (27%) treated with a ten-day course of low-dose acyclovir prophylaxis developed HSV infection. All three occurred after acyclovir was stopped. Five of six evaluable seropositive patients (83%) who did not receive acyclovir prophylaxis suffered HSV infection. We conclude that low-dose oral acyclovir may be effective in the prevention of HSV infection during OKT3 treatment of seropositive patients. Continuation of acyclovir prophylaxis for two to four weeks following the conclusion of OKT3 therapy may prevent occurrence of delayed infections.