Search

Cannabis has been legalized for medical and recreational purposes in multiple countries. A large number of people are using cannabis and some will develop cannabis use disorder (CUD). There is a growing recognition that CUD requires specific interventions. This Review will cover this topic from a variety of perspectives, with a particular emphasis on neurobiological findings and innovative treatment approaches that are being pursued. We will first describe the epidemiology and burden of disease of CUD1 including risk factors associated with CUD (both in terms of general risk and genetic risk variants). Neurobiological alterations identified in brain imaging studies will be presented. Several psychosocial interventions that are useful for the management of CUD1 including motivational enhancement therapy behavioral and cognitive therapy and contingency management will be covered. Although no pharmacological interventions are yet approved for CUD1 we present the most promising pharmacological interventions being tested., Epidemiology of cannabis use disorder Cannabis ranks among the most used psychoactive substances globally, following only caffeine, alcohol, and tobacco (1). An estimated 219 million people between the ages of [...]

Cannabis has been legalized for medical and recreational purposes in multiple countries. A large number of people are using cannabis and some will develop cannabis use disorder (CUD). There is a growing recognition that CUD requires specific interventions. This Review will cover this topic from a variety of perspectives, with a particular emphasis on neurobiological findings and innovative treatment approaches that are being pursued. We will first describe the epidemiology and burden of disease of CUD, including risk factors associated with CUD (both in terms of general risk and genetic risk variants). Neurobiological alterations identified in brain imaging studies will be presented. Several psychosocial interventions that are useful for the management of CUD, including motivational enhancement therapy, behavioral and cognitive therapy, and contingency management, will be covered. Although no pharmacological interventions are yet approved for CUD, we present the most promising pharmacological interventions being tested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are severe conditions that remain extremely challenging to treat in clinical practice. With high rates of non-response to current treatment options and several SUDs with no approved interventions, novel therapies are needed. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can non-invasively modulate the neurocircuitry of brain-based disorders, and investigation into its therapeutic potential for SUDs is growing rapidly. Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the clinical research to date evaluating its safety and efficacy for various SUDs. We highlight the investigations comparing different stimulation parameters to present our current understanding on optimal stimulation parameters. Additionally, we cover key research avenues in the use of neuroimaging to guide treatment, cue-induction paradigms, and adjunctive or combination treatments that may optimize outcomes. Expert opinion: Evidence of rTMS as an effective treatment for certain SUDs has emerged and is preliminary for others. There are a growing number of studies showing benefit and meta-analyses suggesting that rTMS can significantly reduce substance craving and consumption. However, the optimal approach has not been determined, and there is a great deal of heterogeneity in rTMS protocols and mixed outcomes. Further research into strategies for enhancing precision will be crucial in moving the field forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Capacity to consent to treatment of substance use disorders at Ontario's Consent and Capacity Board: A review of past reported decisions Plain Language Summary Title: An Ontario review of legal cases which have considered patients' ability to consent to substance use treatments Plain Language Summary: In general, prescribers must consider whether informed consent was provided prior to starting a treatment. A patient is presumed to be capable to consent to a proposed treatment but could be incapable with respect to any medical treatment. While incapacity is often considered for psychiatric treatments, it could be relevant to substance use treatment like methadone or suboxone, which are also called "Opioid Agonist Therapies" or OAT. OAT is lifesaving and prevents relapse and overdose when a person has an opioid use disorder. If a patient is found incapable of consenting to a treatment, a Substitute Decisions Maker would become the decision maker. In such cases, the patient has the ability to contest or disagree with the finding, and this results in a tribunal hearing at the Consent and Capacity Board in Ontario (CCB). In certain circumstances, the CCB publishes what are known as its Reasons for Decision (RDs), which explain the tribunal's reasoning in coming to a decision in favour of the physician or the person found incapable. This information is publicly searchable. Our methods involved a search of all available CCB RDs in Ontario for search terms related to substance use treatment, such as "methadone". We found that between June 1, 2003 (the date on reporting of RDs began) and June 27, 2023, only 71 RDs involved substance use search terms, out of a total of 10,463 reported RDs. Only one case involved the CCB upholding a finding of incapacity with respect to methadone treatment. These results imply that there are few cases in which the CCB has considered incapacity with respect to substance use treatment, although it is possible that these cases are reported at a lower frequency than other cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment-resistant bipolar depression can be treated effectively using electroconvulsive therapy, but its use is limited because of stigma and cognitive adverse effects. Magnetic seizure therapy is a new convulsive therapy with promising early evidence of antidepressant effects and minimal cognitive adverse effects. However, there are no clinical trials of the efficacy and safety of magnetic seizure therapy for treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Methods: Participants with treatment-resistant bipolar depression were treated with magnetic seizure therapy for up to 24 sessions or until remission. Magnetic seizure therapy was applied over the prefrontal cortex at high (100 Hz; n = 8), medium (50 or 60 Hz; n = 9) or low (25 Hz; n = 3) frequency, or over the vertex at high frequency (n = 6). The primary outcome measure was the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Participants completed a comprehensive battery of neurocognitive tests. Results: Twenty-six participants completed a minimally adequate trial of magnetic seizure therapy (i.e., [greater than or equal to] 8 sessions), and 20 completed full treatment per protocol. Participants showed a significant reduction in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Adequate trial completers had a remission rate of 23.1% and a response rate of 38.5%. Per-protocol completers had a remission rate of 30% and a response rate of 50%. Almost all cognitive measures remained stable, except for significantly worsened recall consistency on the autobiographical memory inventory. Limitations: The open-label study design and modest sample size did not allow for comparisons between stimulation parameters. Conclusion: In treatment-resistant bipolar depression, magnetic seizure therapy produced significant improvements in depression symptoms with minimal effects on cognitive performance. These promising results warrant further investigation with larger randomized clinical trials comparing magnetic seizure therapy to electroconvulsive therapy. Clinical trial registration: NCT01596608; clinicaltrials.gov, Introduction Bipolar disorder is a recurrent neuropsychiatric disorder associated with substantial burden and impairment. (1) It is characterized by episodes of mania or hypomania and episodes of depression, with the [...]

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and chronic pain disorders are pervasive, multifaceted medical conditions that often co-occur. However, their comorbidity is often overlooked, despite its prevalence and clinical relevance. Individuals with AUD are more likely to experience chronic pain than the general population. Conversely, individuals with chronic pain commonly alleviate their pain with alcohol, which may escalate into AUD. This narrative review discusses the intricate relationship between AUD and chronic pain. Based on the literature available, the authors present a theoretical model explaining the reciprocal relationship between AUD and chronic pain across alcohol intoxication and withdrawal. They propose that the use of alcohol for analgesia rapidly gives way to acute tolerance, triggering the need for higher levels of alcohol consumption. Attempts at abstinence lead to alcohol withdrawal syndrome and hyperalgesia, increasing the risk of relapse. Chronic neurobiological changes lead to preoccupation with pain and cravings for alcohol, further entrenching both conditions. To stimulate research in this area, the authors review methodologies to improve the assessment of pain in AUD studies, including self-report and psychophysical methods. Further, they discuss pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies that may target both conditions, potentially improving both AUD and chronic pain outcomes simultaneously. Finally, the authors emphasize the need to manage both conditions concurrently, and encourage both the scientific community and clinicians to ensure that these intertwined conditions are not overlooked given their clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is growing interest in the potential of neuromodulation options in treatment‐resistant obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Magnetic seizure therapy (MST), is a new treatment intervention in which generalized seizures are induced with transcranial magnetic stimulation. We conducted a pilot study to assess the efficacy and cognitive effects of MST in patients with treatment‐resistant OCD. Methods: In an open‐label pilot study, participants with treatment‐resistant OCD and a baseline Yale‐Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y‐BOCS) scores of ≥16 were treated with up to 24 acute treatments. The primary clinical outcomes were clinical response (Y‐BOCS score reduction ≥30%) and remission (final Y‐BOCS score ≤8). A neurocognitive battery, the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptoms–Self Report (QIDS‐SR), the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire‐Short Form (Q‐LES‐Q‐SF) were also completed as secondary measures. Results: Ten participants with OCD who had not responded to medications or psychotherapy enrolled in the study and seven completed an adequate trial (defined as ≥8 treatments). MST was associated with minimal cognitive effects except for some decrease in autobiographical memory and no serious adverse effects. Only one participant met the predefined criteria for response, and none for remission. The baseline and endpoint Y‐BOCS scores were not statistically different. Conclusion: Overall, MST was not beneficial in a small group of patients with treatment‐resistant OCD. At this time, other studies of MST for OCD are not warranted until different coil placements targeting other brain circuits can be proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prerequisite opioid withdrawal symptoms prior to buprenorphine induction are unacceptable to many patients. We assessed whether transdermal buprenorphine minimized withdrawal while bridging to sublingual therapy among hospital inpatients.Methods: Retrospective chart review of (n = 23) inpatients with opioid use disorder or opioid dependence due to chronic pain.Results: Of 23 inpatients, 65% transitioned without symptoms, while 35% experienced mild withdrawal. Ninety-six percent completed planned hospitalizations, with 83% engaged in treatment 4 weeks post-discharge.Discussion and Conclusions: Bridging to sublingual therapy with transdermal buprenorphine patches was feasible without withdrawal symptoms.Scientific Significance: This strategy may facilitate buprenorphine therapy in hospital inpatients. (Am J Addict 2019;00:1-4). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are leading causes of disability, and patients are frequently affected by both conditions. This comorbidity is known to confer worse outcomes and greater illness severity. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation method that has demonstrated antidepressant effects. However, the study of rTMS for patients with MDD and commonly associated comorbidities, such as AUD, has been largely overlooked, despite significant overlap in clinical presentation and neurobiological mechanisms. This narrative review aims to highlight the interrelated aspects of the literature on rTMS for MDD and rTMS for AUD. First, we summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness of rTMS for each condition, both most studied through stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Second, we describe common symptom constructs that can be modulated by rTMS, such as executive dysfunction, that are transdiagnostic across these disorders. Lastly, we describe promising approaches in the personalization and optimization of rTMS that may be applicable to both AUD and MDD. By bridging the gap between research efforts in MDD and AUD, rTMS is well positioned to be developed as a treatment for the many patients who have both conditions concurrently. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]