Search

AimTo assess the associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and sensor glucose metrics in young children with type 1 diabetes, using masked, continuous glucose monitoring data from children aged 2 to < 8 years.Research design and methodsThe analysis included 143 children across 14 sites in the USA, enrolled in a separate clinical trial. Eligibility criteria were: age 2 to 10.0 mmol/l) and a median of ~1 h/day in hypoglycaemia (

Behavioural economics refers to the study of psychological and cognitive factors that relate to decision-making processes. This field is being applied increasingly to health care settings, in which patients receive tangible reinforcers or incentives for meeting objective behavioural criteria consistent with healthy lifestyles. This article reviews the background and efficacy of reinforcement interventions in general, and then as applied to behaviours related to diabetes prevention and management. Specifically, reinforcement interventions have been applied with some notable success towards promoting greater attendance at medical appointments, enhancing weight loss efforts, augmenting exercising regimes, improving medication adherence and increasing blood glucose monitoring. Suggestions for promising areas of future research are provided, keeping in mind the controversial nature of these interventions.

Objective: Even under closed-loop (CL) conditions, meal-related blood glucose (BG) excursions frequently exceed target levels as a result of delays in absorption of insulin from the subcutaneous site of infusion. We hypothesized that delaying gastric emptying with preprandial injections of pramlintide would improve postprandial glycemia by allowing a better match between carbohydrate and insulin absorptions.Research Design and Methods: Eight subjects (4 female; age, 15-28 years; A1C, 7.5 ± 0.7%) were studied for 48 h on a CL insulin-delivery system with a proportional integral derivative algorithm with insulin feedback: 24 h on CL control alone (CL) and 24 h on CL control plus 30-μg premeal injections of pramlintide (CLP). Target glucose was set at 120 mg/dL; timing and contents of meals were identical on both study days. No premeal manual boluses were given. Differences in reference BG excursions, defined as the incremental glucose rise from premeal to peak, were compared between conditions for each meal.Results: CLP was associated with overall delayed time to peak BG (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 h; P < 0.0001) and reduced magnitude of glycemic excursion (88 ± 42 vs. 113 ± 32 mg/dL; P = 0.006) compared with CL alone. Pramlintide effects on glycemic excursions were particularly evident at lunch and dinner, in association with higher premeal insulin concentrations at those mealtimes.Conclusions: Pramlintide delayed the time to peak postprandial BG and reduced the magnitude of prandial BG excursions. Beneficial effects of pramlintide on CL may in part be related to higher premeal insulin levels at lunch and dinner compared with breakfast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine exposure to hyper- and hypoglycemia using blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) profiles in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with residual β-cell function during the first year of insulin treatment.Research Design and Methods: Blinded, 3-7 day CGM profiles were obtained in 16 short-term T1D patients (age 8-18 years, T1D duration 6-52 weeks) who had peak C-peptide levels ranging from 0.46 to 1.96 nmol/L during a mixed-meal tolerance test. Results in this short-term group were compared with those in 34 patients with well-controlled, longer-term T1D (duration ≥5 years), matched for age and A1C with the short-term T1D group, and with those in 26 age-matched nondiabetic individuals.Results: Despite matching for A1C, and therefore similar mean sensor glucose levels in the two T1D groups, short-term T1D participants had a lower frequency of hypoglycemia (0.3 vs. 7.6%, P < 0.001), a trend toward less hyperglycemia (17 vs. 32%, P = 0.15), and a greater percentage in the target range (median 77 vs. 60%, P = 0.02). Indeed, the percentage of sensor glucose levels ≤70 mg/dL in the short-term T1D group (0.3%) did not differ from those in the nondiabetic group (1.7%, P = 0.73). The coefficient of variation of sensor glucose levels (an index of glucose variability) was lower in short-term vs. longer-term T1D participants (27 vs. 42%, respectively, P < 0.001).Conclusions: In youth with short-term T1D who retain residual β-cell function, there is negligible exposure to hypoglycemia and lower glucose variability than in youth with well-controlled T1D of longer duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE Clinicians who treat children with type 1 diabetes often try to minimize the number of daily injections to reduce treatment burden and improve compliance. Despite the manufacturer's cautions against mixing glargine with rapid-acting insulin analogs, clinical studies have failed to demonstrate deleterious effects of mixing on glucose excursions or A1C levels. However, no formal glucose clamp studies have been performed to determine whether mixing with glargine has an adverse effect on the early pharmacodynamic action of rapid-acting insulin in humans. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS To examine this question, euglycemic glucose clamps were performed twice, in random order, in 11 youth with type 1 diabetes (age 15.1 +/- 3 years, A1C 7.6 +/- 0.6%) with 0.2 units/kg lispro and 0.4 units/kg glargine, given either as separate or as a single mixed injection. RESULTS Mixing the two insulins shifted the time action curve to the right, with significantly lower glucose infusion rate (GIR) values after the mixed injections between 60 and 190 min and significantly higher values between 270 and 300 min, lowered the GIR(max) (separate 7.1 +/- 1 vs. mix 3.9 +/- 1, P = 0.03), and markedly delayed the time to reach GIR(max) (separate 116 +/- 8 min vs. mix 209 +/- 15 min, P = 0.004). The GIR area under the curve was significantly lower after the mixed injections. Mixing had similar effects on plasma insulin pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate that mixing lispro with glargine markedly flattens the early pharmacodynamic peak of lispro and causes a shift to the right in the GIR curve changes that might lead to difficulties in controlling meal-related glucose excursions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Pediatric obesity has escalated to epidemic proportions, leading to an array of comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes in youth. Since most overweight children become overweight adults, this chronic condition results in serious metabolic complications by early adulthood. To curtail this major health issue, effective pediatric interventions are essential.Objective: To compare effects of a weight management program, Bright Bodies, on adiposity and metabolic complications of overweight children with a control group.Design: One-year randomized controlled trial conducted May 2002-September 2005.Setting: Recruitment and follow-up conducted at Yale Pediatric Obesity Clinic in New Haven, Conn, and intervention at nearby school.Participants: Random sample of 209 overweight children (body mass index [BMI] >95th percentile for age and sex), ages 8 to 16 years of mixed ethnic groups were recruited. A total of 135 participants (60%) completed 6 months of study, 119 (53%) completed 12 months.Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to either a control or weight management group. The control group (n = 69) received traditional clinical weight management counseling every 6 months, and the weight management group (n = 105) received an intensive family-based program including exercise, nutrition, and behavior modification. Intervention occurred biweekly the first 6 months, bimonthly thereafter. The second randomization within the weight management group assigned participants (n = 35) to a structured meal plan approach (dieting), but this arm of the study was discontinued while enrollment was ongoing due to a high dropout rate.Main Outcome Measures: Change in weight, BMI, body fat, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at 6 and 12 months.Results: Six-month improvements were sustained at 12 months in weight management vs control, including changes in the following (mean [95% confidence interval]): weight (+0.3 kg [-1.4 to 2.0] vs +7.7 kg [5.3 to 10.0]); BMI (-1.7 [-2.3 to -1.1] vs +1.6 [0.8 to 2.3]); body fat (-3.7 kg [-5.4 to -2.1] vs +5.5 kg [3.2 to 7.8]); and HOMA-IR (-1.52 [-1.93 to -1.01] vs +0.90 [-0.07 to 2.05]).Conclusion: The Bright Bodies weight management program had beneficial effects on body composition and insulin resistance in overweight children that were sustained up to 12 months.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00409422. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the acute glucose-lowering effects of aerobic exercise in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.Research Design and Methods: Fifty children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (ages 10 to <18 years) were studied during exercise. The 75-min exercise session consisted of four 15-min periods of walking on a treadmill to a target heart rate of 140 bpm and three 5-min rest periods. Blood glucose and plasma glucagon, cortisol, growth hormone, and norepinephrine concentrations were measured before, during, and after exercise.Results: In most subjects (83%), plasma glucose concentration dropped at least 25% from baseline, and 15 (30%) subjects became hypoglycemic (< or = 60 mg/dl) or were treated for low glucose either during or immediately following the exercise session. The incidence of hypoglycemia and/or treatment for low glucose varied significantly by baseline glucose, occurring in 86 vs. 13 vs. 6% of subjects with baseline values <120, 120-180, and >180 mg/dl, respectively (P < 0.001). Exercise-induced increases in growth hormone and norepinephrine concentrations were marginally higher in subjects whose glucose dropped < or = 70 mg/dl. Treatment of hypoglycemia with 15 g of oral glucose resulted in only about a 20-mg/dl rise in glucose concentrations.Conclusions: In youth with type 1 diabetes, prolonged moderate aerobic exercise results in a consistent reduction in plasma glucose and the frequent occurrence of hypoglycemia when preexercise glucose concentrations are <120 mg/dl. Moreover, treatment with 15 g of oral glucose is often insufficient to reliably treat hypoglycemia during exercise in these youngsters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the effect of exercise on overnight hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).Study Design: At 5 clinical sites, 50 subjects with T1DM (age 11 to 17 years) were studied in a clinical research center on 2 separate days. One day included an afternoon exercise session on a treadmill. On both days, frequently sampled blood glucose levels were measured at the DirecNet central laboratory. Insulin doses were similar on both days.Results: During exercise, plasma glucose levels fell in almost all subjects; 11 (22%) developed hypoglycemia. Mean glucose level from 10 pm to 6 am was lower on the exercise day than on the sedentary day (131 vs 154 mg/dL; P=.003). Hypoglycemia developed overnight more often on the exercise nights than on the sedentary nights (P=.009), occurring on the exercise night only in 13 (26%), on the sedentary night only in 3 (6%), on both nights in 11 (22%), and on neither night in 23 (46%). Hypoglycemia was unusual on the sedentary night if the pre-bedtime snack glucose level was>130 mg/dL.Conclusions: These findings indicate that overnight hypoglycemia after exercise is common in children with T1DM and support the importance of modifying diabetes management after afternoon exercise to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study assessed the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of 3 doses (15 mg, 30 mg, and 45 mg) of pioglitazone in 36 adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Blood samples were obtained over a 48-hour interval after the first dose (day 1) and over a 72-hour interval after the last dose (day 15) of pioglitazone and were assayed for pioglitazone and active metabolites (M-III and M-IV). Pioglitazone systemic exposure increased dose dependently but was less than dose proportional during multiple dosing. The median peak pioglitazone concentration occurred at 2 hours. The mean half-life was 8 to 9 hours for pioglitazone and 24 to 32 hours for M-III and M-IV, with similar values at each dose level. During multiple dosing, accumulation for pioglitazone was negligible, but it reached 2.5- to 3.0-fold for M-III and M-IV. The sustained total serum concentration of active compounds during multiple dosing provides the basis for once-daily dose administration of pioglitazone in adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To describe the challenges and outcomes of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pump therapy in a toddler and adolescent with type 1 diabetes. Insight into patient-family aspects motivating pump use is provided. METHODS: Two cases treated at the Pediatric Diabetes Clinic at Yale University. RESULTS: Upon parental request, CSII was initiated to improve glycemic control in a 4-year-old boy (case 1) with unpredictable food intake. During 68 months of CSII therapy, hemoglobin A1C levels averaged 6.3% +/- 0.6%. Severe hypoglycemic episodes ceased 36 months ago, and occasional postprandial hyperglycemia during early school years was corrected with school nurses' reminders about premeal insulin bolus doses. Currently 9.5 years old, he independently manages all his insulin injections with parental assistance only to change the catheter site. Case 2 is a girl who was nearly 12 years of age when diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Initially managed with daily injections, hypoglycemic episodes were interfering with her physically active lifestyle. At age 13 years, she elected CSII therapy, and glycemic control improved. Temporarily erratic in the immediate period pre- and postmenarche, metabolic control has since stabilized. At 15 years old, she successfully manages her diabetes independently. CONCLUSIONS: To optimize glycemic control, CSII can be initiated and used effectively, both in children of all ages and in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. CSII may be ideal therapy for toddlers, with no apparent lower age boundary for initiating CSII; however, the parenting challenges and requirements for supportive education differ between toddlers and adolescents. When disease and pump management are appropriately individualized, CSII therapy can help children with diabetes achieve and sustain glycemic control. Lifestyle flexibility, quality-of-life improvement, and independence can thus begin early in childhood and be maintained throughout young adulthood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The profile of insulin secretion and the role of proinsulin processing across the spectrum of glucose tolerance in obese youth have not been studied. The aims of this study were to define the role of insulin secretion and proinsulin processing in glucose regulation in obese youth. We performed hyperglycemic clamps to assess insulin secretion, applying a model of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion to the glucose and C-peptide concentration data. Thirty obese youth with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 22 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 10 with type 2 diabetes were studied. The three groups had comparable anthropometric measures and insulin sensitivity. The glucose sensitivity of first-phase secretion showed a significant stepwise decline from NGT to IGT and from IGT to type 2 diabetes. The glucose sensitivity of second-phase secretion was similar in NGT and IGT subjects yet was significantly lower in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Proinsulin-to-insulin ratios were comparable during first- and second-phase secretion between subjects with NGT and IGT and were significantly increased in type 2 diabetes. Obese youth with IGT have a significant defect in first-phase insulin secretion, while a defect in second-phase secretion and proinsulin processing is specific for type 2 diabetes in this age-group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the child, parent, and family factors associated with quality of life and metabolic control in school-aged children with type 1 diabetes on intensive treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed of child, parent, and family psychosocial variables with child quality of life and metabolic control. RESULTS: Families of school-aged children were able to intensively manage type 1 diabetes, achieve good metabolic control (< 7.5%), experience good quality of life, and cope well with the demands of treatment. However, increased depressive symptoms were reported in children (8%) and a parent (29%). CONCLUSIONS: Most school-aged children and families in this sample coped well with the demands of intensive treatment. However, intensive psychosocial support may also be indicated because managing a complex chronic illness is stressful and potentially difficult for some families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study was conducted to determine whether recommendations from the Diabetes Conrol and Complications Trial (DCCT) could be implemented in a large pediatric population using a diabetes clinical nurse specialist program coordinator dedicated to intensive management. Methods: Patients' charts were reviewed to examine HbA|1c levels from before the results of the DCCT were published and again 1 year after the recommendations were implemented. Patients who met the following criteria (N=124) were enrolled: type 1 diabetes, less than 18 years old, followed at Yale for 1 year prior to the results of the DCCT and 1 year after, and HbA|1c level recorded in the medical chart. Results: HcA|1c levels were significantly lower 1 year after implementing the DCCT protocol; 3 years later these same patients improved even further as evidenced by another decrease in HbA|1c levels. The patients were taking more insulin (more Ultralente and regular insulin and less NPH) and had an increased number of injecting at both the 1-year and 3-year follow-up points. Conclusions: The DCCT protocol can be implemented in a large population of pediatric patients with the help of a nurse who is dedicated and available to the patients for ongoing adjustments and provides creative ways to overcome the barriers to achieving normoglycemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This study examined the self-reported impact of different factors on the overall diabetes care of college students with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: An 18-item questionnaire was mailed to 164 students with type 1 diabetes attending college away from home; results from 42 students fulfilled study criteria and wen analyzed. Metabolic control was assessed by relative changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) levels from medical records. RESULTS: HbA1c levels did not change significantly between high school and college, yet most college students reported that diabetes w more difficult to manage in college. Commonly reported barriers to diabetes control included diet, irregular schedules, lack of parental involvement, peer pressure, drugs and alcohol fear of hypoglycemia, and finances. Factors identified as improving diabetes control were an increased sense of responsibility, increased frequency of blood glucose testing, exercise, contact with healthcare providers, fear of hyperglycemia, and knowledge o f the results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Many students reported testing their blood more frequently and taking more injections than in high school; most were on intensive insulin regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the perception that diabetes management was more difficult in college, metabolic control was maintained during college, possibly due to a more intensive treatment approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This study examined the metabolic and quality-of-life effects of using lispro insulin in teenagers. METHODS: Teenagers on multiple daily injections who had not reached metabolic treatment goals were offered the opportunity to use lispro insulin as part of a larger ongoing study of intensive management in youth. Of the 51 who were eligible, 35 used lispro and were followed for 12 months; the remaining 16 had reached treatment goals, were not offered lispro, and comprised the control group. RESULTS: After 12 months, the teens who received lispro insulin achieved equivalent levels of metabolic control to those achieved by teens in the control group, without differences in total daily dose, insulin regimen, or adverse events. Those who received lispro found coping with diabetes less difficult than those who continued on regular insulin, and they reported less negative impact of diabetes on quality of life and fewer worries about diabetes. Both groups were equally satisfied with their diabetes treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Lispro insulin is a safe alternative for youth on intensive regimens, may assist youth in coping with diabetes, and may improve their quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Recommendations from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) indicate that adolescents with type 1 diabetes should be treated with intensive therapy involving multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin or insulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII] to help obtain better metabolic control and prevent later complications. Interest has thus focused on insulin pump therapy to help adolescents meet this challenge. The purpose of this study was to examine responses to CSII and MDI in a large group of adolescents with established type 1 diabetes during a 12-month period and to determine whether either treatment regimen more favorably affected clinical and psychosocial outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One-third of 75 youths aged 12-20 years who were candidates for intensive therapy chose CSII as their mode of treatment. Patients received intensive treatment and education as described by the DCCT investigators. Psychosocial data (e.g., quality of life, depression, self-efficacy, and coping) were collected at baseline and at 6-month intervals, and clinical data (e.g., HbA1c levels, adverse events) were collected every 4-6 weeks. RESULTS: Although both MDI- and CSII-treated adolescents initially exhibited improved metabolic control, this level of control was more difficult to sustain for 12 months in the MDI group (at 6 months HbA1c = 8.1, at 12 months HbA1c = 8.3), whereas average HbA1c levels in the CSII group continued to decrease during the 12 months of treatment (at 6 months HbA1c = 7.7, at 12 months HbA1c = 7.5). Despite lower HbA1c levels in CSII-versus MDI-treated patients, the rate of severe hypoglycemic events was reduced by almost 50% in the CSII group (P = 0.01). Self-reported questionnaires demonstrated that there was improvement in self-efficacy, depression, and quality of life in both MDI- and CSII-treated patients. Finally, adolescents using CSII found coping with diabetes to be less difficult than adolescents using MDI did. CONCLUSIONS: CSII is an alternative means to lower HbA1c levels and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia without adversely affecting psychosocial outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This study examined the metabolic trend and factors associated with an unexpected rise in HbA1c levels during the summer, with a return to baseline when school resumed, in 40 intensively treated adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Psychosocial data were collected using a variety of diabetes evaluation instruments. HbA1c was measured monthly. RESULTS: HbA1c values increased by a mean of .73% from May to July and decreased by a mean of .75% from August to October. Lack of consistency in summer routines compared with school days was associated with a worsening in metabolic control during the summer months. Other factors associated with the summer increase in HbA1c included lower guidance scores on the Diabetes Family Behavior Scale, and higher impact and worry scores on the Diabetes Quality of Life for Youth Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Interviews suggested that teenagers need to take a vacation from intensive diabetes care during the summer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial studying the effects of two different diabetes regimens on the development and progression of early vascular complications in persons with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). All of the centers have a Trial Coordinator. We administered a self-report questionnaire to each center to document the different activities for which the Trial Coordinator assumed responsibility in successfully orchestrating the trial. All Trial Coordinators were responsible primarily for recruitment, screening, medical management, education and training, and adherence and administration. Although documentation indicated that the Trial Coordinator was responsible for all of the above activities, the original applications reflected that very few of the Principal Investigators anticipated such a wide variety of duties. A Trial Coordinator was named in only 13 of the 21 applications and of these, only 6 actually assumed the position. This study points out the need to develop a means to define characteristics, background, and training appropriate for candidates for a Trial Coordinator position in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of crossing over from optimized multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy to sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy for 6 months, and the effects of 18 months' sustained use of SAP. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The 6-month, single-crossover continuation phase of Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C Reduction (STAR 3) provided SAP therapy to 420 subjects who completed the 1-year randomized study. The primary outcome was change in A1C in the crossover group. RESULTS A1C values were initially lower in the continuing-SAP group than in the crossover group (7.4 vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001). A1C values remained reduced in the SAP group. After 3 months on the SAP system, A1C decreased to 7.6% in the crossover group (P < 0.001); this was a significant and sustained decrease among both adults and children (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Switching from optimized MDI to SAP therapy allowed for rapid and safe A1C reductions. Glycemic benefits of SAP therapy persist for at least 18 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on quality of life (QOL) among individuals with type 1 diabetes.Research Design and Methods: In a multicenter trial, 451 children and adults with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to CGM treatment or the control group. Generic and diabetes-specific QOL questionnaires were completed at baseline and 26 weeks by all participants and parents of participants <18 years old, and the CGM satisfaction scale was completed by the CGM group (participants and parents) at 26 weeks.Results: After 26 weeks, QOL scores remained largely unchanged for both the treatment and the control group, although there was a slight difference favoring the adult CGM group on several subscales (P < 0.05). There was substantial satisfaction with CGM technology after 26 weeks among participants and parents.Conclusions: Baseline QOL was high, and the measures showed little change with CGM use, although a high level of CGM satisfaction was reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate long-term effects of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in intensively treated adults with type 1 diabetes.Research Design and Methods: We studied 83 of 86 individuals >or=25 years of age with type 1 diabetes who used CGM as part of a 6-month randomized clinical trial in a subsequent 6-month extension study. RESULTS After 12 months, median CGM use was 6.8 days per week. Mean change in A1C level from baseline to 12 months was -0.4 +/- 0.6% (P < 0.001) in subjects with baseline A1C >or=7.0%. A1C remained stable at 6.4% in those with baseline A1C <7.0%. The incidence rate of severe hypoglycemia was 21.8 and 7.1 events per 100 person-years in the first and last 6 months, respectively. Time per day with glucose levels in the range of 71-180 mg/dl increased significantly (P = 0.02) from baseline to 12 months.Conclusions: In intensively treated adults with type 1 diabetes, CGM use and benefit can be sustained for 12 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Self-monitoring of blood glucose was described as one of the most important advancements in diabetes management since the invention of insulin in 1920. Recent advances in glucose sensor technology for measuring interstitial glucose concentrations have challenged the dominance of glucose meters in diabetes management, while raising questions about the relationships between interstitial and blood glucose levels. This article will review the differences between interstitial and blood glucose and some of the challenges in measuring interstitial glucose levels accurately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent studies have shown that continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), or insulin pump therapy, provides a treatment option that can assist in the attainment of current goals of treatment in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). In pediatric patients, CSII has been demonstrated to reduce both glycosylated hemoglobin levels and frequency of severe hypoglycemia, without sacrifices in safety, quality of life, or excessive weight gain, particularly in conjunction with the use of new insulin analogs and improvements in pump technology. Clinical studies of safety and efficacy of CSII in children are reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing problem among youth. Although type 1 (insulin-dependent) DM is a disease typically diagnosed during childhood or adolescence, estimates indicate that < or = 45% of new diabetes cases in children are type 2. Children with new-onset type 2 DM are often overweight, aged 10 years or older, have a family history of the disease, and are members of a racial/ethnic minority group. DM treatment has progressed greatly in recent decades. Inadequate therapy, urine testing, glycosylated hemoglobin levels of >10%, and high rates of diabetic complications that were common in the past have yielded to more effective treatments, accurate monitoring, and better outcomes. Insulin pumps and insulin analogues represent promising new avenues that have enhanced convenience, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and metabolic control of childhood DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Impaired glucose tolerance is common among obese adolescents, but the changes in insulin sensitivity and secretion that lead to this prediabetic state are unknown. We investigated whether altered partitioning of myocellular and abdominal fat relates to abnormalities in glucose homoeostasis in obese adolescents with prediabetes.Methods: We studied 14 obese children with impaired glucose tolerance and 14 with normal glucose tolerance, of similar ages, sex distribution, and degree of obesity. Insulin sensitivity and secretion were assessed by the euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp and the hyperglycaemic clamp. Intramyocellular lipid was assessed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and abdominal fat distribution by magnetic resonance imaging.Findings: Peripheral glucose disposal was significantly lower in individuals with impaired than in those with normal glucose tolerance (mean 35.4 [SE 4.0] vs 60.6 [7.2] micromoles per kg lean body mass per min; p=0.023) owing to a reduction in non-oxidative glucose disposal metabolism (storage). Individuals with impaired glucose tolerance had higher intramyocellular lipid content (3.04 [0.43] vs 1.99 [0.19]%, p=0.03), lower abdominal subcutaneous fat (460 [47] vs 626 [39] cm2, p=0.04), and slightly higher visceral fat than the controls (70 [11] vs 47 [6] cm2, p=0.065), resulting in a higher ratio of visceral to subcutaneous fat (0.15 [0.02] vs 0.07 [0.01], p=0.002). Intramyocellular and visceral lipid contents were inversely related to the glucose disposal and non-oxidative glucose metabolism and positively related to the 2 h plasma glucose concentration.Interpretation: In obese children and adolescents with prediabetes, intramyocellular and intra-abdominal lipid accumulation is closely linked to the development of severe peripheral insulin resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the long-term effects of glucose-lowering medications (insulin glargine U-100, glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin) when added to metformin on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function., Research Design and Methods: In the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) cohort with type 2 diabetes (n = 4,801), HOMA2 was used to estimate insulin sensitivity (HOMA2-%S) and fasting β-cell function (HOMA2-%B) at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 years on treatment. Oral glucose tolerance test β-cell responses (C-peptide index [CPI] and total C-peptide response [incremental C-peptide/incremental glucose over 120 min]) were evaluated at the same time points. These responses adjusted for HOMA2-%S in regression analysis provided estimates of β-cell function., Results: HOMA2-%S increased from baseline to year 1 with glargine and remained stable thereafter, while it did not change from baseline in the other treatment groups. HOMA2-%B and C-peptide responses were increased to variable degrees at year 1 in all groups but then declined progressively over time. At year 5, CPI was similar between liraglutide and sitagliptin, and higher for both than for glargine and glimepiride [0.80, 0.87, 0.74, and 0.64 (nmol/L)/(mg/dL) * 100, respectively; P < 0.001], while the total C-peptide response was greatest with liraglutide, followed in descending order by sitagliptin, glargine, and glimepiride [1.54, 1.25, 1.02, and 0.87 (nmol/L)/(mg/dL) * 100, respectively, P < 0.001]. After adjustment for HOMA2-%S to obtain an estimate of β-cell function, the nature of the change in β-cell responses reflected those in β-cell function., Conclusions: The differential long-term effects on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function of four different glucose-lowering medications when added to metformin highlight the importance of the loss of β-cell function in the progression of type 2 diabetes., (© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.)

BACKGROUND: Incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in children and adolescents is increasing, but treatment options are limited. METHODS: This was a 26-week, phase 3 trial with a 26-week extension among patients (10 to 17 years of age) with uncontrolled T2D (A1C 6.5 to 10.5%) receiving metformin, insulin, or both. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to 5 mg of dapagliflozin (N=81), 2.5 mg of saxagliptin (N=88), or placebo (N=76). Patients in active treatment groups with A1C ≥7% at week 12 were further randomly assigned 1:1 at week 14 to continue the dose or up-titrate to a higher dose (10 mg of dapagliflozin or 5 mg of saxagliptin). The primary end point was change in A1C at week 26. Safety was assessed over 52 weeks. RESULTS: At week 26, the difference versus placebo in adjusted mean change in A1C was −1.03 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.57 to −0.49; P<0.001) for dapagliflozin and −0.44 percentage points (95% CI, −0.93 to 0.05; P=0.078) for saxagliptin. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs occurred in 72.8% and 8.6% of patients receiving dapagliflozin, 69.3% and 8.0% of patients receiving saxagliptin, and 71.1% and 6.6% of patients receiving placebo. Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 4.9%, 4.5%, and 7.9% of patients in each group, respectively. Over 52 weeks, the most common AE was headache (dapagliflozin 14.8%; placebo 5.3%). Most events were mild and none was considered serious or resulted in discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin, but not saxagliptin, showed significant improvement in A1C compared with placebo. Nonserious headaches were more common in participants treated with dapagliflozin than in those receiving placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03199053.)

Background: In youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D), high haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are associated with an increased risk for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)., Aims: This study examined whether daily school-supervised basal insulin injections were feasible and if they reduced the risk of morning ketosis in children and adolescents with high HbA1c levels. We hypothesized that supervised glargine and degludec would reduce the risk of ketosis and that the prolonged action of degludec would protect from ketosis after consecutive days of unsupervised injections., Materials & Methods: After a 2-4-week run-in, youth (10-18 years, HbA1c ≥ 8.5%) managing T1D with injections were randomized to school-supervised administration of degludec or glargine for 4 months. School nurses observed daily blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and glucose checks. During COVID closures, the research team supervised procedures remotely., Results: Data from 28 youth (age 14.3 ± 2.3 years, HbA1c 11.4 ± 1.9%, 64% F) were analysed. School-supervised injections of both basal insulins for 1-4 days progressively lowered the percent of participants with elevated BHB. The percent of participants with elevated BHB (≥0.6 mmol/L) after 2 days of unsupervised basal insulin doses at home was greater in the glargine than degludec group but had a high p-value (17.2% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.3). HbA1c was unchanged in both groups., Discussion: In youth with T1D at high risk for DKA, daily supervised long-acting insulin administration decreased the probability of elevated ketone levels on subsequent school days, regardless of basal insulin type. A larger sample size may have demonstrated that the longer action profile of degludec would offer additional protection from ketosis during days of not attending school., Conclusion: Engaging school-based caregivers in management of youth with T1D on injected insulin may decrease clinically significant ketosis and minimize acute complications of diabetes., (© 2023 Diabetes UK.)

Objectives: Achieving optimal glycemic outcomes in young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is challenging. This study examined the durability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) coupled with a family behavioral intervention (FBI) to improve glycemia., Study Design: This one-year study included an initial 26-week randomized controlled trial of CGM with FBI ( CGM+FBI ) and CGM alone ( Standard-CGM ) compared with blood glucose monitoring (BGM), followed by a 26-week extension phase wherein the BGM Group received the CGM+FBI ( BGM-Crossover ) and both original CGM groups continued this technology., Results: Time in range (70-180 mg/dL) did not improve with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 37%, 52 weeks 41%; Standard-CGM: baseline 41%, 52 weeks 44%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 38%, 52 weeks 40%). All three groups sustained decreases in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 3.4%, 52 weeks 2.0%; Standard-CGM: baseline 4.1%, 52 weeks 2.1%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 4.5%, 52 weeks 1.7%, P -values <.001). Hemoglobin A1c was unchanged with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 8.3%, 52 weeks 8.2%; Standard-CGM: baseline 8.2%, 52 weeks 8.0%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 8.1%, 52 weeks 8.3%). Sensor use remained high (52-week study visit: CGM+FBI 91%, Standard-CGM 92%, BGM-Crossover 88%)., Conclusion: Over 12 months young children with T1D using newer CGM technology sustained reductions in hypoglycemia and, in contrast to prior studies, persistently wore CGM. However, pervasive hyperglycemia remained unmitigated. This indicates an urgent need for further advances in diabetes technology, behavioral support, and diabetes management educational approaches to optimize glycemia in young children.