Search

The antiviral drugs tecovirimat, brincidofovir, and cidofovir are considered for mpox (monkeypox) treatment despite a lack of clinical evidence. Moreover, their use is affected by toxic side-effects (brincidofovir, cidofovir), limited availability (tecovirimat), and potentially by resistance formation. Hence, additional, readily available drugs are needed. Here, therapeutic concentrations of nitroxoline, a hydroxyquinoline antibiotic with a favourable safety profile in humans, inhibited the replication of 12 mpox virus isolates from the current outbreak in primary cultures of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts and a skin explant model by interference with host cell signalling. Tecovirimat, but not nitroxoline, treatment resulted in rapid resistance development. Nitroxoline remained effective against the tecovirimat-resistant strain and increased the anti-mpox virus activity of tecovirimat and brincidofovir. Moreover, nitroxoline inhibited bacterial and viral pathogens that are often co-transmitted with mpox. In conclusion, nitroxoline is a repurposing candidate for the treatment of mpox due to both antiviral and antimicrobial activity.

Recent findings in permanent cell lines suggested that SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 induces a stronger interferon response than Delta. Here, we show that BA.1 and BA.5 but not Delta induce an antiviral state in air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures of primary human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells and primary human monocytes. Both Omicron subvariants caused the production of biologically active type I (α/β) and III (λ) interferons and protected cells from super-infection with influenza A viruses. Notably, abortive Omicron infection of monocytes was sufficient to protect monocytes from influenza A virus infection. Interestingly, while influenza-like illnesses surged during the Delta wave in England, their spread rapidly declined upon the emergence of Omicron. Mechanistically, Omicron-induced interferon signalling was mediated via double-stranded RNA recognition by MDA5, as MDA5 knock-out prevented it. The JAK/ STAT inhibitor baricitinib inhibited the Omicron-mediated antiviral response, suggesting it is caused by MDA5-mediated interferon production, which activates interferon receptors that then trigger JAK/ STAT signalling. In conclusion, our study 1) demonstrates that only Omicron but not Delta induces a substantial interferon response in physiologically relevant models, 2) shows that Omicron infection protects cells from influenza A virus super-infection, and 3) indicates that BA.1 and BA.5 induce comparable antiviral states.

Omicron BA.1 variant isolates were previously shown to replicate less effectively in interferon-competent cells and to be more sensitive to interferon treatment than a Delta isolate. Here, an Omicron BA.2 isolate displayed intermediate replication patterns in interferon-competent Caco-2-F03 cells when compared to BA.1 and Delta isolates. Moreover, BA.2 was less sensitive than BA.1 and similarly sensitive as Delta to betaferon treatment. Delta and BA.1 displayed similar sensitivity to the approved anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs remdesivir, nirmatrelvir, EIDD-1931 (the active metabolite of molnupiravir) and the protease inhibitor aprotinin, whereas BA.2 was less sensitive than Delta and BA.1 to EIDD-1931, nirmatrelvir and aprotinin. Nirmatrelvir, EIDD-1931, and aprotinin (but not remdesivir) exerted synergistic antiviral activity in combination with betaferon, with some differences in the extent of synergism detected between the different SARS-CoV-2 variants. In conclusion, even closely related SARS-CoV-2 (sub)variants can differ in their biology and in their response to antiviral treatments. Betaferon combinations with nirmatrelvir and, in particular, with EIDD-1931 and aprotinin displayed high levels of synergism, which makes them strong candidates for clinical testing. Notably, effective antiviral combination therapies are desirable, as a higher efficacy is expected to reduce resistance formation.

The nucleoside analogue nelarabine, the prodrug of arabinosylguanine (AraG), is effective against T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) but not against B-cell ALL (B-ALL). The underlying mechanisms have remained elusive. Here, data from pharmacogenomics studies and a panel of ALL cell lines reveal an inverse correlation between nelarabine sensitivity and the expression of SAMHD1, which can hydrolyse and inactivate triphosphorylated nucleoside analogues. Lower SAMHD1 abundance is detected in T-ALL than in B-ALL in cell lines and patient-derived leukaemic blasts. Mechanistically, T-ALL cells display increased SAMHD1 promoter methylation without increased global DNA methylation. SAMHD1 depletion sensitises B-ALL cells to AraG, while ectopic SAMHD1 expression in SAMHD1-null T-ALL cells induces AraG resistance. SAMHD1 has a larger impact on nelarabine/AraG than on cytarabine in ALL cells. Opposite effects are observed in acute myeloid leukaemia cells, indicating entity-specific differences. In conclusion, SAMHD1 promoter methylation and, in turn, SAMHD1 expression levels determine ALL cell response to nelarabine., Rothenburger et al. combine the analysis of data from large pharmacogenomics screens with cell line experiments to elucidate mechanisms behind nelarabine resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). They identify low expression of the dNTP hydrolase SAMHD1 as a determinant of nelarabine sensitivity, suggesting the enzyme as a biomarker.

SummaryBackgroundSAMHD1 mediates resistance to anti-cancer nucleoside analogues, including cytarabine, decitabine, and nelarabine that are commonly used for the treatment of leukaemia, through cleavage of their triphosphorylated forms. Hence, SAMHD1 inhibitors are promising candidates for the sensitisation of leukaemia cells to nucleoside analogue-based therapy. Here, we investigated the effects of the cytosine analogue CNDAC, which has been proposed to be a SAMHD1 substrate, in the context of SAMHD1.MethodsCNDAC was tested in 13 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML cell lines), in 26 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cell lines, ten AML sublines adapted to various antileukaemic drugs, 24 single cell-derived clonal AML sublines, and primary leukaemic blasts from 24 AML patients. Moreover, 24 CNDAC-resistant sublines of the AML cell lines HL-60 and PL-21 were established. The SAMHD1 gene was disrupted using CRISPR/Cas9 and SAMHD1 depleted using RNAi, and the viral Vpx protein. Forced DCK expression was achieved by lentiviral transduction. SAMHD1 promoter methylation was determined by PCR after treatment of genomic DNA with the methylation-sensitive HpaII endonuclease. Nucleoside (analogue) triphosphate levels were determined by LC-MS/MS. CNDAC interaction with SAMHD1 was analysed by an enzymatic assay and by crystallisation.ResultsAlthough the cytosine analogue CNDAC was anticipated to inhibit SAMHD1, SAMHD1 mediated intrinsic CNDAC resistance in leukaemia cells. Accordingly, SAMHD1 depletion increased CNDAC triphosphate (CNDAC-TP) levels and CNDAC toxicity. Enzymatic assays and crystallisation studies confirmed CNDAC-TP to be a SAMHD1 substrate. In 24 CNDAC-adapted acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) sublines, resistance was driven by DCK (catalyses initial nucleoside phosphorylation) loss. CNDAC-adapted sublines displayed cross-resistance only to other DCK substrates (e.g. cytarabine, decitabine). Cell lines adapted to drugs not affected by DCK or SAMHD1 remained CNDAC sensitive. In cytarabine-adapted AML cells, increased SAMHD1 and reduced DCK levels contributed to cytarabine and CNDAC resistance.ConclusionIntrinsic and acquired resistance to CNDAC and related nucleoside analogues are driven by different mechanisms. The lack of cross-resistance between SAMHD1/ DCK substrates and non-substrates provides scope for next-line therapies after treatment failure.

Hypomethylating agents decitabine and azacytidine are regarded as interchangeable in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, their mechanisms of action remain incompletely understood, and predictive biomarkers for HMA efficacy are lacking. Here, we show that the bioactive metabolite decitabine triphosphate, but not azacytidine triphosphate, functions as activator and substrate of the triphosphohydrolase SAMHD1 and is subject to SAMHD1-mediated inactivation. Retrospective immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow specimens from AML patients at diagnosis revealed that SAMHD1 expression in leukemic cells inversely correlates with clinical response to decitabine, but not to azacytidine. SAMHD1 ablation increases the antileukemic activity of decitabine in AML cell lines, primary leukemic blasts, and xenograft models. AML cells acquire resistance to decitabine partly by SAMHD1 up-regulation. Together, our data suggest that SAMHD1 is a biomarker for the stratified use of hypomethylating agents in AML patients and a potential target for the treatment of decitabine-resistant leukemia., In acute myeloid leukemia, hypomethylating agents decitabine and azacytidine are used interchangeably. Here, the authors show that the major metabolite of decitabine, but not azacytidine, is subject to SAMHD1 inactivation, highlighting SAMHD1 as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target

Background:MDM2 inhibitors are under investigation for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients in phase III clinical trials. To study resistance formation to MDM2 inhibitors in AML cells, we here established 45 sub-lines of the AMLTP53wild-type cell lines MV4-11 (15 sub-lines), OCI-AML-2 (10 sub-lines), OCI-AML-3 (12 sub-lines), and SIG-M5 (8 sub-lines) with resistance to the MDM2 inhibitor nutlin-3.Methods: Nutlin-3-resistant sub-lines were established by continuous exposure to stepwise increasing drug concentrations. TheTP53status was determined by next generation sequencing, cell viability was measured by MTT assay, and p53 was depleted using lentiviral vectors encoding shRNA.Results:All MV4-11 sub-lines harboured the same R248W mutation and all OCI-AML-2 sub-lines the same Y220C mutation, indicating the selection of pre-existingTP53-mutant subpopulations. In concordance, rare alleles harbouring the respective mutations could be detected in the parental MV4-11 and OCI-AML-2 cell lines. The OCI-AML-3 and SIG-M5 sub-lines were characterised by varyingTP53mutations or wild typeTP53, indicating the induction ofde novo TP53mutations. Doxorubicin, etoposide, gemcitabine, cytarabine, and fludarabine resistance profiles revealed a noticeable heterogeneity among the sub-lines even of the same parental cell lines. Loss-of-p53 function was not generally associated with decreased sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs.Conclusion:We introduce a substantial set of models of acquired MDM2 inhibitor resistance in AML. MDM2 inhibitors select, in dependence on the nature of a given AML cell population, pre-existingTP53-mutant subpopulations or inducede novo TP53mutations. Although loss-of-p53 function has been associated with chemoresistance in AML, nutlin-3-adapted sub-lines displayed in the majority of experiments similar or increased drug sensitivity compared to the respective parental cells. Hence, chemotherapy may remain an option for AML patients after MDM2 inhibitor therapy failure. Even sub-lines of the same parental cancer cell line displayed considerable heterogeneity in their response to other anti-cancer drugs, indicating the need for the detailed understanding and monitoring of the evolutionary processes in cancer cell populations in response to therapy as part of future individualised treatment protocols.