Search

A krónikus myeloid leukaemia a tirozin­kináz-gátló kezelések megjelenése óta ha­lálos betegségből jól kezelhető, krónikus kórképpé vált. A betegség alapját a Phi­la­del­­phia-kromoszóma kialakulása és a kons­ti­tutívan aktív BCR-ABL1 tirozinkináz ke­let­kezése okozza. A tirozinkináz-gátlók al­kal­mazása mellett a krónikus fázisú CML-es betegek életkilátásai ma már megköze­lítik a normálpopulációét. Az elérhető ké­szítmények közötti választást olyan tényezők befolyásolják, mint a beteg kora, társbetegségei, a kezelés célja és az alkalmazni kívánt készítmény mellékhatásai. A tirozinkináz-gátló kezelésre refrakter betegek terápiája ma is kihívást jelent. Megoldást jelenthetnek az olyan új hatásmechanizmusú készítmények, mint az asciminib, amely a BCR-ABL1 alloszterikus inhibitora és a fenti esetekben is kiváló a hatékonysága. Az előrehaladott, blastos fázisú CML prognózisa továbbra is kedvezőtlen, a tirozinkináz-gátlók mellett általában kemoterápiás kezelés is szükséges, és a betegek hosszú távú gyógyulása csak allogén haemopoeticus őssejt-transzplantációval érhető el.

Background and purpose – Despite the decrease in transplant-related mortality, patients who receive hematopoietic stemcell transplants often suffer from short-and long-term morbidities, poorer quality of life, and psychosocial functioning deficits. Several studies have compared the quality of life and affective symptoms of patients after undergoing autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplants. Some studies have reported similar or greater quality of life impairments in allogeneic hematopoietic stemcell recipients, but the findings have been inconsistent. Our purpose was to examine the influence of the type of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on the quality of life and affective symptoms of patients. Methods – The study sample comprised 121 patients with various hematological diseases who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation at St. István and St. László Hospitals, Budapest. The study had a cross-sectional design. Quality of life was evaluated using the Hungarian version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy– Bone Marrow Transplant scale (FACT-BMT). Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using Spielberger’s State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), respectively. Basic sociodemographic and clinical variables were also recorded. Comparisons between autologous and allogeneic recipients were analyzed using a t-test when the variables were normally distributed and a Mann–Whitney U test otherwise. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors that contributed to the quality of life and the affective symptoms in each group. Results – Quality of life (p=0.83) and affective symptoms (pBDI=0.24; pSSTAI=0.63) were similar between the autologous and allogeneic transplant groups. The BDI scores of allogeneic transplant patients indicated mild depression, but their STAI scores were similar to those of the general population. Allogeneic transplant patients with symptoms of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) experienced more severe clinical conditions (p=0.01), poorer functional status (p

Az onko-kardiológia napjaink egyik dinamikusan fejlődő határterületi tudománya, amelynek célja, hogy a multidiszciplináris szemlélet jegyében, optimalizálja a daganatellenes kezelések eredményességét és minimalizálja a kardiovaszkuláris szövődmények kialakulását. A személyre szabott, a kockázatbecslésen és a társszakmák szoros együttműködésen alapuló ellátásnak kiemelkedő szerepe van az onkológiai betegek kezelésének minden egyes fázisában. A sikeres daganatellenes kezelés, a hoszszú távú túlélés és a jobb életminőség biztosításának alappillére. A European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2022-ben kiadott első onko-kardiológiai útmutatójának célja egy új szemlélet közvetítése a klinikusok és a multidiszciplináris onkológiai team számára. Fő témája az onkológiai betegek kezelés alatti és utáni kardiovaszkuláris szövődményeinek megelőzése, felismerése és kezelése. Tartalmában számos újszerű elemet hordoz. A publikáció célja az ajánlás átfogó bemutatása.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare severe autoimmune bleeding disorder with significant morbidity and mortality. Although critical for disease control, there is no consensus for the best immunosuppressive regimen. Most authors use steroids first line, followed by other agents for steroid failures. Upfront combined regimens offer the advantage of reduced steroid exposure and toxicity as well as increased efficacy. We retrospectively analyzed data from 32 patients with AHA treated on an identical such institutional protocol: cyclophosphamide 1000 mg on days 1 and 22, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, and rituximab 100 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (the regimen was termed CyDRi). All patients received at least 1 cycle of CyDRi. If necessary, CyDRi was repeated until remission, no sooner than day 43 of the previous cycle. Bleeding control was rapidly achieved. The median time for bleeding control was 15.5 days (range, 0-429 days; interquartile range, 2.5-29.5 days). Thirty-one (96.8%) of 32 patients achieved durable complete remission (CR); 29 (90.6%) of 32 patients were alive at last follow-up, all of them in CR. The median time to reach first CR was 77 days (range, 19-939 days; interquartile range, 31-115 days). Toxicity and side effects were acceptable and milder than those of commonly used, prolonged steroid therapies. In conclusion, the CyDRi regimen produced markedly higher CR rates and overall survival than currently used sequential regimens. Taken together, CyDRi proved to be an attractive option for the immunosuppression of elderly patients with AHA.

BACKGROUND: Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone has shown improved progression-free and overall survival versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We aimed to assess these regimens in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: ELOQUENT-1 is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 185 hospitals, oncology practices, and research centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed, untreated, symptomatic myeloma and not candidates for high-dose therapy plus HSCT, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone using an interactive voice response system, stratified by the International Staging System (ISS; stage I-II vs III), age (

Aim: To investigate the serum circulating DPP4 activity in patients with COVID-19 disease. Materials & methods: Serum samples from 102 hospitalized COVID-19 patients and 43 post-COVID-19 plasma donors and 39 SARS-CoV-2 naive controls and their medical data were used. Circulating DPP4 activities according to different COVID-19 disease peak severity (WHO) groups at sampling and at peak were assessed. Results: A significant decrease (p [area = 0.5] < 0.0001) as single predictor and 83.45% (p[area = 0.5] < 0.0001) in combination with age among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Conclusion: Decreased circulating DPP4 activity is associated with severe COVID-19 disease and is a strong prognostic biomarker of mortality.

Háttér: A szívamyloidosis egy ritkának gondolt betegség, amely kezelés nélkül gyorsan halálhoz vezet. Az utóbbi években a rohamosan fejlődő diagnosztikus módszereknek és modern terápiás lehetőségeknek köszönhetően egyre gyakrabban ismerik fel. A diagnosztikában az EKG-nak és szívultrahangnak kiemelt jelentőséget tulajdonítanak. Célkitűzés: A legfrissebb 2021-es Európai Kardiológusok Társaságának ajánlása tükrében kívántuk vizsgálni, hogy szívamyloidosisban jellemzőnek gondolt EKG-eltérések (alacsony kilengések, R-redukció), illetve a legegyszerűbb ultrahangos paraméter, mint a megnövekedett (≥12 mm) balkamra-falvastagság milyen gyakran fordulnak elő betegeink között. Szintén vizsgálni kívántuk, hogy a bal kamrai falvastagság és az EKG-n látott low voltage, illetve R-redukció előfordulása különbözik-e a háttérben álló patológiák esetén betegeinknél. Módszerek: Retrospektív vizsgálatunkba 104, 2009. január és 2022. április között szívamyloidosis miatt a Semmelweis Egyetem Belgyógyászati és Hematológiai Klinikáján megfordult beteget vontunk be. A háttérben álló patológia alapján három csoportot alkottunk: könnyűlánc-amyloidosis (AL), mutációs típusú transztiretin-amyloidosis (ATTRv) és vad típusú transztiretin-amyloidosis (ATTRwt). Leírtuk és összehasonlítottuk a legfontosabb demográfiai-, klinikai-, EKG-, szívultrahangos- és laboratóriumi paramétereket. Eredmények: Betegeink életkorának mediánja 68 (59–78) év volt, közülük. 55% férfi (n=57). AL-amyloidosisból 71, ATTRwt-csoportból 19, ATTRv-csoportból, pedig 13 beteget vizsgáltunk. Az EKG-n low voltage 54%-ban (n=56), R-hullám-redukció 56%-ban (n=58) fordult elő. Szívultrahanggal, 2D-módban mért bal kamrai szeptum és hátsó fal vastagságát átlagoltuk minden betegnél. Az így nyert értékek mediánja 16 (14–18) mm volt. A betegek 91%-ánál (n=95) megnövekedett bal kamrai falvastagságot láttunk. A fő célkitűzésünket vizsgálva szignifikánsnak adódott a különbség betegeink között mind a bal kamrai átlagos falvastagodás (nagyobb vagy egyenlő 12 mm) és low voltage, mind a bal kamrai átlagos falvastagság és EKG-n látott R-redukció jelenlétének aránya között (91% vs. 54% és 91% vs. 56%; p

Venetoclax, a potent B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). VENICE II is an open-label, single-arm, phase 3b study (NCT02980731) evaluating the impact of venetoclax monotherapy (400 mg once daily) for ≤2 years on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. The primary endpoint was mean change in the global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) from baseline to Week 48. Overall, 210 patients received ≥1 dose of venetoclax; median treatment duration was 67.4 weeks. The primary endpoint was met with mean improvement of +9.3 points (n = 156, 95% confidence interval 6.1-12.5; p=.004) in GHS/QoL. At Week 48, clinically meaningful improvements were observed for role functioning, fatigue, and insomnia domains of EORTC QLQ-C30, suggesting venetoclax monotherapy has a positive impact on HRQoL. No new safety signals were reported.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A myeloma multiplex mindmáig alapvetően gyógyíthatatlan betegség, ezért nagy klinikai jelentőségük van az eredményes mentő kezeléseknek. A szájon át adható első proteaszómagátlóval, az ixazomibbal kiegészített lenalidomid-dexametazon terápia jól tolerálható, csak orális szerekből álló kombináció, mely hazánkban 2015 áprilisától kezdődően a „Named Patient Program” keretén belül vált elérhetővé relabált, refrakter myeloma multiplexes betegek kezelésére. Célkitűzés: Kutatásunk célja az ixazomib-lenalidomid-dexametazon kezelés mellett a hosszú távon progressziómentes túlélők célzott vizsgálata. Módszer: A program keretében összesen 7 centrumban 80 visszaeső beteg részesült e triplet kezelésben, adataikat retrospektíven elemeztük. Leíró statisztikai és Kaplan–Meier-analízist végeztünk. Eredmények: A betegek nagyobb hányada reagált: 63,75%-os válaszarány mellett 14 (17,5%) betegnél nem volt terápiás válasz/stabil betegség alakult ki, és 15-nél (18,75%) a betegség a kezelés mellett is progrediált. A progressziómentes túlélés a teljes betegcsoportban 10,6 hónapnak adódott, ugyanakkor 16 beteg (18,75%) két éven túl progressziómentesnek bizonyult, sőt közülük 11-nél a betegség még 3 év után sem progrediált. Tanulmányunkban a fenti, hosszú távú túlélő betegcsoport tulajdonságait tárjuk fel. Megbeszélés: A folyamatos terápia a myeloma multiplex kezelésében meghatározóvá vált. Ezért fontos ismernünk, hogy kik lehetnek azok a betegek, akik különösen sokat profitálnak egy bizonyos terápiából. A hosszú távon progressziómentes túlélők között az immunglobulin-nehézláncot érintő transzlokációk vagy triszómiák közül (trend szintjén) az utóbbiak kedvezőbb progressziómentes túléléssel bírtak, de progressziómentes platót mindkét betegcsoportban észleltünk. A betegség tumortömegét mérő nemzetközi stádiumbeosztás (ISS) nem jelezte előre a hosszú túlélést. Gyógyszerelhagyáshoz vezető mellékhatást a hosszú távú túlélő csoportban egyet sem regisztráltunk; az észlelt mellékhatások nagy része enyhe volt. Következtetések: Munkánk során az ixazomib-lenalidomid-dexametazon kombinációt effektívnek és biztonságosnak találtuk relabált, refrakter myeloma multiplex kezelésére, mely a betegek mintegy hatodánál több éven át eredményesen alkalmazható. Cikkünkkel a hazai beteganyagon szerzett tapasztalatainkat szeretnénk megosztani a COVID–19-világjárvány alatt különösen aktuálissá vált, tisztán orális terápiás lehetőségről. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(36): 1451–1458. Summary. Introduction: Despite great advances in therapy, multiple myeloma is still a largely incurable disease, therefore the importance of salvage therapies is paramount. The first oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone is a tolerable, orally administered regime, which has become available for Hungarian relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma patients from April 2015 in the Named Patient Program. Objective: Our goal was to investigate the long-time progression-free surviving patient population treated with the ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone triplet. Method: We retrospectively studied a total of 80 patients from 7 centers who received the triplet combination. Survival analyses were performed. Results: Two-third of the patients responded: the overall response rate was 63.75%. 14 patients (17.5%) did not respond/had stable disease and 15 patients (18.75%) outright progressed upon therapy. Although progression-free survival was only 10.6 months for the entire patient cohort, the disease in a subgroup of 16 patients did not progress within two years. In fact, 11 of them were still in sustained remission after 3 years of therapy. Our goal was to analyze the characteristics of this subgroup. Discussion: The idea of long-term therapy of multiple myeloma is gaining widespread acceptance. Therefore it is important to know which patients may benefit the most from certain therapies. Among these 16 long-term responder patients, reciprocal translocation of the immunoglobulin heavy chain seemed to lack an adverse impact on progression-free survival; comparable to trisomies, both curves had a progression-free plateau. The International Staging System (ISS) score at the start of therapy did not predict long-term survivorship. Most of the side effects in this subgroup were mild, manageable, none led to therapy discontinuation. Conclusion: Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone was confirmed to be an effective and safe combination for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma, and one-sixth of the treated patients were able to receive it for several years, effectively. This fully oral therapeutic option is at its best during the present COVID–19 pandemic. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(36): 1451–1458.

Helicobacter pylori is a common pathogen causing gastric inflammation and malignancy. Fetuin-A is a multifunctional protein that is involved in the regulation of calcification, insulin resistance and inflammation. Reports on serum levels of fetuin-A in acute H. pylori infection are contradictory. We intended to see whether H. pylori post-infection status has a long-term effect on serum fetuin-A levels in a well-characterized series of systemic lupus erythematosus cases. In this cross-sectional study 117 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus were enrolled. Helicobacter infection status and serum fetuin-A concentration were determined by ELISA and radial immunodiffusion, respectively. H. pylori positive patients had higher serum fetuin-A concentration than negative ones: 517 (456–603) vs. 476 (408–544) mg L−1, median (25–75% percentiles), P = 0.020. No other parameters differed between these groups. During univariate regression analysis fetuin-A levels were associated with Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), White blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), serum total protein, albumin, and the SLEDAI index at the time of diagnosis but only serum albumin remained a significant determinant in multivariate regression study.

Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils of light chains produced by clonal CD38+ plasma cells. Daratumumab, a human CD38-targeting antibody, may improve outcomes for this disease.We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis to receive six cycles of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone either alone (control group) or with subcutaneous daratumumab followed by single-agent daratumumab every 4 weeks for up to 24 cycles (daratumumab group). The primary end point was a hematologic complete response.A total of 388 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 11.4 months. The percentage of patients who had a hematologic complete response was significantly higher in the daratumumab group than in the control group (53.3% vs. 18.1%) (relative risk ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.1; P0.001). Survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression favored the daratumumab group (hazard ratio for major organ deterioration, hematologic progression, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.02). At 6 months, more cardiac and renal responses occurred in the daratumumab group than in the control group (41.5% vs. 22.2% and 53.0% vs. 23.9%, respectively). The four most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (13.0% in the daratumumab group and 10.1% in the control group), pneumonia (7.8% and 4.3%, respectively), cardiac failure (6.2% and 4.8%), and diarrhea (5.7% and 3.7%). Systemic administration-related reactions to daratumumab occurred in 7.3% of the patients. A total of 56 patients died (27 in the daratumumab group and 29 in the control group), most due to amyloidosis-related cardiomyopathy.Among patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone was associated with higher frequencies of hematologic complete response and survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ANDROMEDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03201965.).

According to our experience the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) may be used to estimate the pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism (acPE). To this end, we devised a novel ECG score (nECGs) composed of 5 known ECG criteria, best characterizing the key pathogenetic steps of acPE. A retrospective derivation cohort including 136 patients with acPE and a prospective validation cohort including 149 consecutive patients were used to devise and validate the nECGs. The latter cohort consisted of 76 patients with acPE and 73 controls presenting with characteristic symptoms of acPE, in whom the work-up ruled out acPE. We compared the diagnostic value of our nECGs with those of another ECG score (Daniel-ECG-score) and of the best prediction rules (3 Wells score and 2 Geneva score variants). The sensitivity (98.7%), negative predictive value (98%), test accuracy (84.4%) and the negative likelihood ratio (LR) (0.019) of the nECGs were superior to those of all other investigated methods. There was no between-groups difference in the positive LR. The specificity (69%) of the nECGs was inferior to those of the Daniel-ECG-score and Wells scores and did not differ or was superior to those of the Geneva score variants. The positive predictive value (77.3%) of the nECGs was superior to those of the 2 Geneva scores and did not differ from those of the other methods. In conclusion, the nECGs due to its superior sensitivity, negative predictive value, test accuracy, and negative LR estimated the pretest probability of acPE better than the Daniel-ECG-score and the prediction rules.

Absztrakt: A súlyos akut légúti szindrómát kiváltó, új típusú koronavírus, a SARS-CoV2 olyan példátlan világjárványt okozott, amely szélsőséges terhelést jelent a még a legfejlettebb országok egészségügyi rendszereire is és azok társadalmaira. Az újonnan emberi kórokozóvá váló vírus ellen sem védőoltás, sem hatékony célzott terápia nem áll rendelkezésre. A járványhelyzetre reagálva a világszerte, köztük Magyarországon is, meghozott szigorú korlátozások a vérellátás tevékenységét egyfelől a donációs hajlandóság és aktivitás kifejezett csökkenése, másfelől a felhasználók igényeinek nehezebben jósolható csökkenése révén érintették. Az OVSz országos adatai szerint a vörösvérsejt-, illetve plazmakészítmények felhasználása mintegy 30%-os, míg a thrombocytakészítményeké mintegy 20%-os csökkenést mutatott 2020. április hónapban az előző év azonos időszakához képest. Ugyanebben az időszakban a mobil véradási események száma országosan 61%-kal, a véradásra megjelent donorok száma pedig 28%-kal csökkent. A korábban járványt okozó légúti vírusokkal és a SARS-CoV2-vel is meglevő klinikai tapasztalatok alapján nem valószínűsíthető az új koronavírus hematogén úton történő átvitele, így a véradás előtti szűrés sem indokolt a potenciálisan fertőzöttek kiszűrését segítő általános óvintézkedések betartása mellett. A hematológiai betegellátásban a vérkészítmények felhasználásának csökkenése kisebb mértékű volt, és kifejezett szóródást mutatott a vizsgált szegedi és budapesti egyetemi központok összehasonlításában. Az új kórokozó elleni vakcina és célzott kezelés hiányában a SARS-CoV2 elleni konvaleszcens plazmaterápia ígéretes és racionális, azonnal hozzáférhető terápiás lehetőség. Az FDA kivételesen gyorsan meghozott bátorító állásfoglalása és irányelve hatására több párhuzamos, nagyobb esetszámú és a korszerű klinikai kutatási szempontokat is figyelembe vevő, a SARS-CoV2 elleni konvaleszcens plazmaterápiára irányuló klinikai vizsgálat indult az USA-ban és más nyugati országokban, köztük Magyarországon is a vérellátó szolgálatok aktív részvételével.

Summary Background The PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV trials aimed to compare the novel monopegylated interferon ropeginterferon alfa-2b with hydroxyurea, the standard therapy for patients with polycythaemia vera, over 3 years of treatment. Methods PROUD-PV and its extension study, CONTINUATION-PV, were phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label, trials done in 48 clinics in Europe. Patients were eligible if 18 years or older with early stage polycythaemia vera (no history of cytoreductive treatment or less than 3 years of previous hydroxyurea treatment) diagnosed by WHO's 2008 criteria. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to ropeginterferon alfa-2b (subcutaneously every 2 weeks, starting at 100 μg) or hydroxyurea (orally starting at 500 mg/day). After 1 year, patients could opt to enter the extension part of the trial, CONTINUATION-PV. The primary endpoint in PROUD-PV was non-inferiority of ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus hydroxyurea regarding complete haematological response with normal spleen size (longitudinal diameter of ≤12 cm for women and ≤13 cm for men) at 12 months; in CONTINUATION-PV, the coprimary endpoints were complete haematological response with normalisation of spleen size and with improved disease burden (ie, splenomegaly, microvascular disturbances, pruritus, and headache). We present the final results of PROUD-PV and an interim analysis at 36 months of the CONTINUATION-PV study (per statistical analysis plan). Analyses for safety and efficacy were per-protocol. The trials were registered on EudraCT, 2012-005259-18 (PROUD-PV) and 2014-001357-17 (CONTINUATION-PV, which is ongoing). Findings Patients were recruited from Sept 17, 2013 to March 13, 2015 with 306 enrolled. 257 patients were randomly assigned, 127 were treated in each group (three patients withdrew consent in the hydroxyurea group), and 171 rolled over to the CONTINUATION-PV trial. Median follow-up was 182·1 weeks (IQR 166·3–201·7) in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b and 164·5 weeks (144·4–169·3) in the standard therapy group. In PROUD-PV, 26 (21%) of 122 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group and 34 (28%) of 123 patients in the standard therapy group met the composite primary endpoint of complete haematological response with normal spleen size. In CONTINUATION-PV, complete haematological response with improved disease burden was met in 50 (53%) of 95 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group versus 28 (38%) of 74 patients in the hydroxyurea group, p=0·044 at 36 months. Complete haematological response without the spleen criterion in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group versus standard therapy group were: 53 (43%) of 123 patients versus 57 (46%) of 125 patients, p=0·63 at 12 months (PROUD-PV), and 67 (71%) of 95 patients versus 38 (51%) of 74 patients, p=0·012 at 36 months (CONTINUATION-PV). The most frequently reported grade 3 and grade 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased γ-glutamyltransferase (seven [6%] of 127 patients) and increased alanine aminotransferase (four [3%] of 127 patients) in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group, and leucopenia (six [5%] of 127 patients) and thrombocytopenia (five [4%] of 127 patients) in the standard therapy group. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in three (2%) of 127 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group and five (4%) of 127 patients in the hydroxyurea group. One treatment-related death was reported in the standard therapy group (acute leukaemia). Interpretation In patients with early polycythaemia vera, who predominantly presented without splenomegaly, ropeginterferon alfa-2b was effective in inducing haematological responses; non-inferiority to hydroxyurea regarding haematological response and normal spleen size was not shown at 12 months. However, response to ropeginterferon alfa-2b continued to increase over time with improved responses compared with hydroxyurea at 36 months. Considering the high and durable haematological and molecular responses and its good tolerability, ropeginterferon alfa-2b offers a valuable and safe long-term treatment option with features distinct from hydroxyurea. Funding AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG.

Summary Background Polycythaemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterised by excessive proliferation of erythroid, myeloid, and megakaryocytic components in the bone marrow due to mutations in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene. Ruxolitinib, a JAK 1 and JAK 2 inhibitor, showed superiority over best available therapy in a phase 2 study in patients with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. We aimed to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib with best available therapy in patients with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. Methods We report the 5-year results for a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (RESPONSE) that enrolled patients at 109 sites across North America, South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients (18 years or older) with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either ruxolitinib or best available therapy. Patients randomly assigned to the ruxolitinib group received the drug orally at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day. Single-agent best available therapy comprised hydroxyurea, interferon or pegylated interferon, pipobroman, anagrelide, approved immunomodulators, or observation without pharmacological treatment. The primary endpoint, composite response (patients who achieved both haematocrit control without phlebotomy and 35% or more reduction from baseline in spleen volume) at 32 weeeks was previously reported. Patients receiving best available therapy could cross over to ruxolitinib after week 32. We assessed the durability of primary composite response, complete haematological remission, overall clinicohaematological response, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety after 5-years of follow-up. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01243944 . Findings We enrolled patients between Oct 27, 2010, and Feb 13, 2013, and the study concluded on Feb 9, 2018. Of 342 individuals screened for eligibility, 222 patients were randomly assigned to receive ruxolitinib (n=110, 50%) or best available therapy (n=112, 50%). The median time since polycythaemia vera diagnosis was 8·2 years (IQR 3·9–12·3) in the ruxolitinib group and 9·3 years (4·9–13·8) in the best available therapy group. 98 (88%) of 112 patients initially randomly assigned to best available therapy crossed over to receive ruxolitinib and no patient remained on best available therapy after 80 weeks of study. Among 25 primary responders in the ruxolitinib group, six had progressed at the time of final analysis. At 5 years, the probability of maintaining primary composite response was 74% (95% CI 51–88). The probability of maintaining complete haematological remission was 55% (95% CI 32–73) and the probability of maintaining overall clinicohaematological responses was 67% (54–77). In the intention-to-treat analysis not accounting for crossover, the probability of survival at 5 years was 91·9% (84·4–95·9) with ruxolitinib therapy and 91·0% (82·8–95·4) with best available therapy. Anaemia was the most common adverse event in patients receiving ruxolitinib (rates per 100 patient-years of exposure were 8·9 for ruxolitinib and 8·8 for the crossover population), though most anaemia events were mild to moderate in severity (grade 1 or 2 anaemia rates per 100 patient-years of exposure were 8·0 for ruxolitinib and 8·2 for the crossover population). Non-haematological adverse events were generally lower with long-term ruxolitinib treatment than with best available therapy. Thromboembolic events were lower in the ruxolitinib group than the best available therapy group. There were two on-treatment deaths in the ruxolitinib group. One of these deaths was due to gastric adenocarcinoma, which was assessed by the investigator as related to ruxolitinib treatment. Interpretation We showed that ruxolitinib is a safe and effective long-term treatment option for patients with polycythaemia vera who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. Taken together, ruxolitinib treatment offers the first widely approved therapeutic alternative for this post-hydroxyurea patient population. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Absztrakt: Bevezetés: Az autológ haemopoeticus őssejtek transzplantációja ígéretes kezelési lehetőség egyes malignus és nem malignus betegségek körében. A beavatkozás ugyanakkor szövődményekkel járhat, ezek közül kiemelkedő fontosságúak a korai, illetve késői poszttranszplantációs szakban fellépő infekciók. Célkitűzés: A korai (Módszer: A 2007 és 2014 között intézetünkben autológ haemopoeticus őssejtek transzplantációjával kezelt 699 beteg prospektíven gyűjtött adatait retrospektív módon vizsgáltuk és dolgoztuk fel. Eredmények: A 699 beteg medián életkora 56 (interkvartilis tartomány: 43–62) év, 54%-uk (376 fő) férfi. 25 pácienst más centrumba irányítottak vissza további gondozásra, 19 beteg utánkövetése pedig megszakadt. A betegek 69,8%-ában (488 fő) fordult elő neutropeniás láz. 96 betegben (13,7%) összesen 102 infekciós epizódot azonosítottunk. A leggyakrabban – összesen 49 epizódban – bacteriaemiát észleltünk. Ezek előfordulási mediánja 7 (5–11) nap volt a transzplantációt követően. A bacteriaemiák döntő többsége (33/49) a megtapadás előtt lépett fel. Incidenciájuk a malignus lymphomában szenvedő betegek esetében szignifikánsan magasabb volt, mint a plazmasejt-rendellenességekben szenvedő csoportban (p = 0,0005, OR: 2,41, 95% CI: 1,49–3,99). Vírusfertőzés 12, míg bizonyított vagy valószínű invazív gombainfekció 8 alkalommal következett be. A poszttranszplantációs +100 napig követett 655 páciensnél a kórházi halálozás 2,4% (16 fő) volt, amelyből 8 haláleset infekciós szövődménnyel állt összefüggésben. A korai infekciók kedvezőtlenül befolyásolták a túlélést (p = 0,0001). Következtetés: Autológőssejt-transzplantáltakban az ismeretlen eredetű, neutropeniás láz gyakori. A dokumentált bacteriaemiák aránya azonban alacsony. A plazmasejtes alapbetegség miatt kezeltekhez képest a lymphomás betegekben nagyobb valószínűséggel lép fel bacteriaemia. A korai infekciók rontják a túlélés esélyeit, így megelőzésük és hatékony kezelésük továbbra is kiemelt fontosságú. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(3): 103–109.

Despite the introduction of novel agents, multiple myeloma remains incurable for most patients, necessitating further therapeutic options. Venetoclax, a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, had shown promising results in patients with translocation t(11;14), but questions remain open about its optimal use. We have contacted all Hungarian haematology centers for their experience treating t(11;14) myeloma patients with venetoclax. 58 patients were reported. 37 received venetoclax in the relapsed/refractory setting with few or no other therapeutic options available. 21 patients started venetoclax as salvage after failing to achieve satisfactory response to first line therapy. In the relapsed/refractory setting objective response rate (ORR) was 94%, median progression-free survival (PFS) 10.0 months and median overall survival (OS) 14.6 months. In reinduction patients, ORR was 100%, median PFS and OS were not reached. Importantly, we found no adverse effect of high risk features such as deletion 17p or renal failure, in fact renal failure ameliorated in 42% of the cases, including three patients who became dialysis independent. Our study also reports the highest number of plasma cell leukemia cases successfully treated with venetoclax published in literature, with refractory plasma cell leukemia patients achieving a median PFS of 10.0 and a median OS of 12.2 months.

Fedratinib, an oral Janus kinase-2 (JAK2) inhibitor, reduces splenomegaly and improves symptom burden in patients with myelofibrosis. Regulatory approval of fedratinib 400-mg daily was based on results of an updated analysis of the pivotal phase III, placebo-controlled JAKARTA trial in patients with JAK-inhibitor-naive myelofibrosis. At week 24, spleen volume response rate was 47% and symptom response rate was 40% with fedratinib 400 mg, versus 1% and 9% respectively, with placebo. Common adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, anaemia, and vomiting. No Wernicke encephalopathy occurred in patients receiving fedratinib 400 mg/day. These updated data support use of first-line fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis.

Background: Variant transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease, where the mutation of the transthyretin gene (TTR) results in the deposition of pathogenic protein fibrils in various tissues. The mutation type influences the clinical course. Until now, no data were available on the genotype, phenotype, and prevalence of Hungarian ATTRv patients. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence, regional distribution, genotypes, and phenotypes of Hungarian patients with ATTRv. Methods: With the collaboration of Hungarian regional and university centers, we identified patients diagnosed with ATTRv. We also searched prior publications for case studies of Hungarian ATTRv patients. Results: 40 individuals in 23 families with ATTRv were identified within the borders of Hungary. At the time of the diagnosis, 24 of them were symptomatic. The two most common mutations were ATTRHis88Arg (nine families) and ATTRIle107Val (8 families). ATTRVal30Met was demonstrated in 2 families, and ATTRVal122del, ATTRPhe33Leu, ATTRIle84Ser, and ATTRAsp18Gly in one family each. The median age of the symptomatic patients at the time of clinical diagnosis was 65 years. The most common clinically significant organ involvement was restrictive cardiomyopathy, found in 24 patients. Polyneuropathy was diagnosed in 20 patients. A total of 19 patients showed a mixed phenotype. The leading symptom was heart failure in 8 cases (3 of them had only cardiac symptoms), polyneuropathy in 11 cases (all of them also had cardiac symptoms), and equally severe cardiac and neuropathy symptoms were present in 3 cases. Out of 24 symptomatic patients, 10 received targeted pharmacological therapy. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 195 months. At the time of the retrospective analysis, 12 patients had already died, and 1 patient underwent heart transplantation. Conclusions: As TTR genotype influences the phenotype and clinical course of ATTRv, it is important to know the regional data. In Hungary, ATTRHis88Arg and ATTRIle107Val are the most common mutations in ATTRv, both presenting with mixed phenotype, but the median age at the time of the diagnosis is 9 years lower in patients with ATTRHis88Arg than in patients with ATTRIle107Val.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative therapeutic option for malignant hematopoietic diseases. Cytokines including transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) play a pivotal role in immune reconstruction, and the development of graft versus host disease (GvHD) or infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of TGFB1 gene -1347C>T variant in the outcome of HSCT in a cohort of 409 adult recipient-donor pairs. TGFB1 variant was analysed from genomic DNA with LightCycler hybridisation probe method. In case of myeloablative conditioning, donor TGFB1 genotype correlated with overall survival (60-month OS for CC: 62.1 ± 4.8%; CT: 46.8 ± 4.8%; TT: 35.6 ± 9.3%; p = 0.032), which was independent of age, donor type and GvHD prophylaxis in multivariate analysis (HR:2.35, 95%CI:1.35-4.10, p = 0.003). The cumulative incidence of acute GvHD grade III-IV [CC:10%; CT:17%; TT:24%], and non-relapse mortality was higher in TT-carriers (24-month NRM: CC:24%; CT:26%; TT:46%, p = 0.035). We did not find any association between recipient TGFB1 -1347C>T polymorphism and HSCT outcome. Our results suggest that donor TGFB1 -1347C>T may exert an adverse influence on the outcome of myeloablative conditioning transplantation.

Absztrakt: Az akut myeloid leukemia (AML) osztalyozasanak es rizikobecslesenek alapjaul a citogenetikai elteresek szolgalnak, azonban az elmult evekben az uj generacios szekvenalasnak (NGS) koszonh...

AIM To retrospectively assess the clinical effectiveness of intra-arterial steroid administration (IASA) treatment in adult patients who developed steroid-refractory gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease (GI-aGvHD) (≥stage II) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical data of 10 consecutive adult patients (age range, 19–61 years; mean age, 42 years) of a single centre with GI-aGvHD (≥stage II) who showed no response to intravenous methylprednisolone and received IASA into the superior (SMA) and/or inferior mesenteric arteries (IMA) were analysed. The severity of aGvHD was determined as the volume of diarrhoea (stages 0–IV) and the Glucksberg grading system before and 12±3 SD, 27±4 and 54±6 days after IASA treatment. Median follow-up was 65 days (range, 22–370 days). RESULTS Six out of 10 patients at 12 days, 8/10 patients at 27 days, 6/10 patients at 54 days after IASA showed gastrointestinal response. Among them, 1/10 patients at 12 days, 4/10 patients at 27 days, and the same 4/10 patients at 54 days showed complete resolution of GI-aGvHD. The 4/10 patients who reached complete resolution of GI-aGvHD at day 12 or 27 showed a sustained symptom-free state. One in 10 patient showed only a temporary response, 5/10 patients died between days 22 and 67. CONCLUSIONS IASA seems to be a potentially useful second-line therapy for intravenous steroid-refractory GI-aGvHD.

PEREIRA, JULIANA/0000-0002-0655-2821; ZINZANI, PIER LUIGI/0000-0002-2112-2651; Trotman, Judith/0000-0001-8009-4593 WOS: 000462407900001 PubMed: 30707661 PURPOSEThe aim of this open-label, first-in-setting, randomized phase III trial was to evaluate the efficacy of alisertib, an investigational Aurora A kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).PATIENTS AND METHODSAdult patients with relapsed/refractory PTCLone or more prior therapywere randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral alisertib 50 mg two times per day (days 1 to 7; 21-day cycle) or investigator-selected single-agent comparator, including intravenous pralatrexate 30 mg/m(2) (once per week for 6 weeks; 7-week cycle), or intravenous gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) or intravenous romidepsin 14 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15; 28-day cycle). Tumor tissue (disease subtype) and imaging were assessed by independent central review. Primary outcomes were overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Two interim analyses and one final analysis were planned.RESULTSBetween May 2012 and October 2014, 271 patients were randomly assigned (alisertib, n = 138; comparator, n = 133). Enrollment was stopped early on the recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee as a result of the low probability of alisertib achieving PFS superiority with full enrollment. Centrally assessed overall response rate was 33% for alisertib and 45% for the comparator arm (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.08). Median PFS was 115 days for alisertib and 104 days for the comparator arm (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.637 to 1.178). The most common adverse events were anemia (53% of alisertib-treated patients v 34% of comparator-treated patients) and neutropenia (47% v 31%, respectively). A lower percentage of patients who received alisertib (9%) compared with the comparator (14%) experienced events that led to study drug discontinuation. Of 26 on-study deaths, five were considered treatment related (alisertib, n = 3 of 11; comparator, n = 2 of 15). Two-year overall survival was 35% for each arm.CONCLUSIONIn patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL, alisertib was not statistically significantly superior to the comparator arm. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited Funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

The phase 3 AETHERA trial established brentuximab vedotin (BV) as a consolidative treatment option for adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) at high risk of relapse or progression after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). Results showed that BV significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo plus best supportive care alone. At 5-year follow-up, BV continued to provide patients with sustained PFS benefit; 5-year PFS was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51-66) with BV vs 41% (95% CI, 33-49) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.521; 95% CI, 0.379-0.717). Similarly, patients with ≥2 risk factors in the BV arm experienced significantly higher PFS at 5 years than patients in the placebo arm (HR, 0.424; 95% CI, 0.302-0.596). Upfront consolidation with BV significantly delayed time to second subsequent therapy, an indicator of ongoing disease control, vs placebo. Peripheral neuropathy, the most common adverse event in patients receiving BV, continued to improve and/or resolve in 90% of patients. In summary, consolidation with BV in adult patients with cHL at high risk of relapse or progression after auto-HSCT confers a sustained PFS benefit and is safe and well tolerated. Physicians should consider each patient's HL risk factor profile when making treatment decisions. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01100502.

The ENESTfreedom trial assessed the feasibility of treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) following frontline nilotinib treatment. Results for long-term outcomes after a 5-year follow-up are presented herein. Patients who had received ≥2 years of frontline nilotinib therapy and achieved MR4.5 underwent a 1-year nilotinib treatment consolidation phase before attempting TFR. At the 5-year data cut-off, 81/190 patients entering the TFR phase (42.6%) were still in TFR, with 76 (40.0%) in MR4.5. Patients who lost major molecular response (MMR) entered a treatment re-initiation phase; 90/91 patients entering this phase (98.9%) regained MMR and 84/91 patients (92.3%) regained MR4.5. The Kaplan–Meier estimated treatment-free survival rate at 5 years was 48.2%. No disease progression or CML-related deaths were reported. Whereas the incidence of adverse events (AEs) declined from 96 weeks following the start of TFR, an increase in AE frequency was observed for patients in the treatment re-initiation phase. Low Sokal risk score, BCR-ABL1IS levels at 48 weeks of TFR and stable MR4.5 response for the first year of TFR were associated with higher TFR rates. Overall, these results support the efficacy and safety of attempting TFR following upfront nilotinib therapy of >3 years in patients with CML-CP.

In Hungary, the cost of lenalidomide-based therapy is covered only for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, therefore lenalidomide is typically used in the second-line either as part of a triplet with proteasome inhibitors or as a doublet. Lenalidomide-dexamethasone is a standard treatment approach for relapsed/refractory MM, and according to recent large randomized clinical trials (RCT, the standard arm of POLLUX, ASPIRE, TOURMALINE), the progression-free survival (PFS) is expected to be approximately 18 months. We surveyed ten Hungarian centers treating MM and collected data of 278 patients treated predominantly after 2016. The median age was 65 years, and patients were distributed roughly equally over the 3 international staging system groups, but patients with high risk cytogenetics were underrepresented. 15.8% of the patients reached complete response, 21.6% very good partial response, 40.6% partial response, 10.8% stable disease, and 2.5% progressed on treatment. The median PFS was unexpectedly long, 24 months, however only 9 months in those with high risk cytogenetics. We found interesting differences between centers regarding corticosteroid type (prednisolone, methylprednisolone or dexamethasone) and dosing, and also regarding the choice of anticoagulation, but the outcome of the various centers were not different. Although the higher equivalent steroid dose resulted in more complete responses, the median PFS of those having lower corticosteroid dose and methylprednisolone were not inferior compared to the ones with higher dose dexamethasone. On multivariate analysis high risk cytogenetics and the number of prior lines remained significant independent prognostic factors regarding PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005). Our results show that in well-selected patients Lenalidomide-dexamethasone can be a very effective treatment with real-world results that may even outperform those reported in the recent RCTs. This real world information may be more valuable than outdated RCT data when treatment options are discussed with patients.

Background Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a peptide–drug conjugate with unique PK properties that rapidly penetrates cells, where it is metabolised to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen has only been administered via central venous catheter (CVC); however, peripheral venous catheter (PVC) administration may be preferred by patients if safety and tolerability are acceptable. The ongoing PORT study aims to assess the PK, safety, tolerability and efficacy of melflufen CVC vs PVC administration in patients with RRMM (NCT04412707). Methods Patients (following ≥2 lines of prior therapy) were randomised (1:1) to melflufen 40 mg (with oral dexamethasone 40 mg [20 mg for patients aged ≥75 years] weekly on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22) either via PVC in cycle 1 then CVC in cycle 2 (Arm A) or via CVC in cycle 1 and then PVC in cycle 2 (Arm B). From cycle 2 (Arm A) or cycle 3 (Arm B) onwards, patients received melflufen via CVC. PK sampling was performed frequently during and after the 30-minute melflufen infusion. Primary endpoints were maximum observed concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration–time profile from start of infusion to both last measurable concentration (AUC0–t) and to infinity (AUC0–inf) for melphalan, and frequency and severity of PVC-related local infusion-site reactions. Secondary endpoints included PK variables for melflufen and desethyl-melflufen and general safety and tolerability. PK parameters after CVC and PVC administration were compared using bioequivalence methods. Results At data cutoff (2 June 2021), 27 patients had received melflufen (median age 67 years; 48.1% male), of whom 19 patients received at least two doses and were evaluable for PK analysis. Melphalan Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–inf were all bioequivalent for CVC and PVC administration, as demonstrated by a 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of means within 80–125%. For melflufen, the ratio of means was 107–117% for the PK parameters, with all upper 90% CIs above 125%. For desethyl-melflufen, AUC0–t and AUC0–inf were bioequivalent and the 90% CI for Cmax was marginally above the upper limit (127%). Melflufen disappeared rapidly from plasma after the end of infusion, with an average half-life of 5–7 minutes. Melphalan Cmax was observed on average 7–9 minutes after the end of melflufen infusion for both routes of administration, which reflects the delay in distribution of melphalan from tissues to plasma. No PVC-related local reactions were reported. The overall melflufen safety profile was in line with previous studies. Conclusion Systemic melphalan exposure is similar after melflufen PVC and CVC administration. Differences between PVC- and CVC-related PK parameters for melflufen and desethyl-melflufen are considered to have no clinical consequences as their plasma-exposure duration is short. There were no local reactions after melflufen PVC administration.

Background Despite therapeutic advances, multiple myeloma remains incurable. Venetoclax, a selective bcl-2 inhibitor may be a step toward personalised therapy for t(11;14) patients, but questions remain about its optimal use. Methods We retrospectively evaluated hematologic response, survival and safety after venetoclax treatment in t(11;14) myeloma patients in Hungary. Results Overall, 49 patients from seven clinical centers were reported. We divided patients into two groups based on the clinical setting: 32 relapsed/refractory patients, who received venetoclax after multiple lines of therapy, often in an ultimate effort; and 17 frontline patients, who achieved unsatisfactory response to standard first line therapy and were treated with venetoclax as reinduction before intended ASCT. We observed remarkably good hematological response rates (ORR): 94% in the relapsed/refractory group and 100% in the frontline setting. This translated into a median PFS of 9.6 months and a median OS of 14.6 months in the relapsed group; median PFS and OS were not reached in the reinduction group. Known adverse prognostic factors, such as 17p deletion, kidney failure or 1q21 amplification did not convey significantly worse prognosis in our study. Almost one third of patients had impaired kidney function during venetoclax therapy, including three patients requiring dialysis. Clinically relevant improvement was observed in 42% of these patients; dialysis could be stopped in all three cases. Notably, our study also included six plasma cell leukemia patients, with a remarkable median PFS of 10 months and over one year median OS in relapsed disease. Vulnerable patients with PCL, renal failure or refractory disease reported more adverse events, requiring supportive measures or dose adjustment, but cessation of venetoclax therapy did not become necessary. Conclusion Venetoclax therapy is a promising option with few side effects and very good response rates for t(11;14) patients, both in the frontline and in the relapsed setting

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has revolutionised the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Acquired mutations emerging at position C481 in the BTK tyrosine kinase domain are the predominant genetic alterations associated with secondary ibrutinib resistance. To assess the correlation between disease progression, and the emergence and temporal dynamics of the most common resistance mutation BTK

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A myeloma multiplex mindmáig alapvetően gyógyíthatatlan betegség, ezért nagy klinikai jelentőségük van az eredményes mentő kezeléseknek. A szájon át adható első proteaszómagátlóval, az ixazomibbal kiegészített lenalidomid-dexametazon terápia jól tolerálható, csak orális szerekből álló kombináció, mely hazánkban 2015 áprilisától kezdődően a "Named Patient Program" keretén belül vált elérhetővé relabált, refrakter myeloma multiplexes betegek kezelésére. Célkitűzés: Kutatásunk célja az ixazomib-lenalidomid-dexametazon kezelés mellett a hosszú távon progressziómentes túlélők célzott vizsgálata. Módszer: A program keretében összesen 7 centrumban 80 visszaeső beteg részesült e triplet kezelésben, adataikat retrospektíven elemeztük. Leíró statisztikai és Kaplan-Meier-analízist végeztünk. Eredmények: A betegek nagyobb hányada reagált: 63,75%-os válaszarány mellett 14 (17,5%) betegnél nem volt terápiás válasz/stabil betegség alakult ki, és 15-nél (18,75%) a betegség a kezelés mellett is progrediált. A progressziómentes túlélés a teljes betegcsoportban 10,6 hónapnak adódott, ugyanakkor 16 beteg (18,75%) két éven túl progressziómentesnek bizonyult, sőt közülük 11-nél a betegség még 3 év után sem progrediált. Tanulmányunkban a fenti, hosszú távú túlélő betegcsoport tulajdonságait tárjuk fel. Megbeszélés: A folyamatos terápia a myeloma multiplex kezelésében meghatározóvá vált. Ezért fontos ismernünk, hogy kik lehetnek azok a betegek, akik különösen sokat profitálnak egy bizonyos terápiából. A hosszú távon progressziómentes túlélők között az immunglobulin-nehézláncot érintő transzlokációk vagy triszómiák közül (trend szintjén) az utóbbiak kedvezőbb progressziómentes túléléssel bírtak, de progressziómentes platót mindkét betegcsoportban észleltünk. A betegség tumortömegét mérő nemzetközi stádiumbeosztás (ISS) nem jelezte előre a hosszú túlélést. Gyógyszerelhagyáshoz vezető mellékhatást a hosszú távú túlélő csoportban egyet sem regisztráltunk; az észlelt mellékhatások nagy része enyhe volt. Következtetések: Munkánk során az ixazomib-lenalidomid-dexametazon kombinációt effektívnek és biztonságosnak találtuk relabált, refrakter myeloma multiplex kezelésére, mely a betegek mintegy hatodánál több éven át eredményesen alkalmazható. Cikkünkkel a hazai beteganyagon szerzett tapasztalatainkat szeretnénk megosztani a COVID-19-világjárvány alatt különösen aktuálissá vált, tisztán orális terápiás lehetőségről. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(36): 1451-1458.Despite great advances in therapy, multiple myeloma is still a largely incurable disease, therefore the importance of salvage therapies is paramount. The first oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone is a tolerable, orally administered regime, which has become available for Hungarian relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma patients from April 2015 in the Named Patient Program.Our goal was to investigate the long-time progression-free surviving patient population treated with the ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone triplet.We retrospectively studied a total of 80 patients from 7 centers who received the triplet combination. Survival analyses were performed.Two-third of the patients responded: the overall response rate was 63.75%. 14 patients (17.5%) did not respond/had stable disease and 15 patients (18.75%) outright progressed upon therapy. Although progression-free survival was only 10.6 months for the entire patient cohort, the disease in a subgroup of 16 patients did not progress within two years. In fact, 11 of them were still in sustained remission after 3 years of therapy. Our goal was to analyze the characteristics of this subgroup.The idea of long-term therapy of multiple myeloma is gaining widespread acceptance. Therefore it is important to know which patients may benefit the most from certain therapies. Among these 16 long-term responder patients, reciprocal translocation of the immunoglobulin heavy chain seemed to lack an adverse impact on progression-free survival; comparable to trisomies, both curves had a progression-free plateau. The International Staging System (ISS) score at the start of therapy did not predict long-term survivorship. Most of the side effects in this subgroup were mild, manageable, none led to therapy discontinuation.Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone was confirmed to be an effective and safe combination for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma, and one-sixth of the treated patients were able to receive it for several years, effectively. This fully oral therapeutic option is at its best during the present COVID-19 pandemic. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(36): 1451-1458.

PURPOSE The double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) versus placebo-Rd in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We report the final analyses for overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to ixazomib-Rd (n = 360) or placebo-Rd (n = 362), stratified by number of prior therapies (1 v 2 or 3), previous proteasome inhibitor (PI) exposure (yes v no), and International Staging System disease stage (I or II v III). OS (intent-to-treat population) was a key secondary end point. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 85 months, median OS with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd was 53.6 versus 51.6 months (hazard ratio, 0.939; P = .495). Lower hazard ratios, indicating larger magnitude of OS benefit with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd, were seen in predefined subgroups: refractory to any (0.794) or last (0.742) treatment line; age > 65-75 years (0.757); International Staging System stage III (0.779); 2/3 prior therapies (0.845); high-risk cytogenetics (0.870); and high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q21 amplification (0.862). Following ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd, 71.7% versus 69.9% of patients received ≥ 1 anticancer therapy, of whom 24.7% versus 33.9% received daratumumab and 71.8% versus 76.9% received PIs (next-line therapy: 47.5% v 55.8%). Rates of new primary malignancies were similar with ixazomib-Rd (10.3%) and placebo-Rd (11.9%). There were no new or additional safety concerns. CONCLUSION Median OS values in both arms were the longest reported in phase III studies of Rd-based triplets in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma at the time of this analysis; progression-free survival benefit with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd did not translate into a statistically significant OS benefit on intent-to-treat analysis. OS benefit was greater in subgroups with adverse prognostic factors. OS interpretation was confounded by imbalances in subsequent therapies received, especially PIs and daratumumab.