Search

This document is a correction notice for an article titled "AMPK-Activated Protein Kinase Suppresses Ccr2 Expression by Inhibiting the NF-κB Pathway in RAW264.7 Macrophages." The correction states that there was an error in Figure 2 of the article, specifically with the beta actin. The correct Figure 2 is provided in the correction notice. The article discusses the effects of AMPK activation on Ccr2 expression in macrophages and presents experimental data to support the findings. The authors of the article are Fumiaki Kumase, Kimio Takeuchi, Yuki Morizane, Jun Suzuki, Hidetaka Matsumoto, Keiko Kataoka, Ahmad Al-Moujahed, Daniel E. Maidana, Joan W. Miller, and Demetrios G. Vavvas. [Extracted from the article]

EGFL7 is a secreted angiogenic factor, which in contrast to the well-known secreted angiogenic molecules VEGF and FGF-2, is almost exclusively expressed by endothelial cells and may act in an autocrine fashion. Prior studies have shown EGFL7 to mediate its angiogenic effects by interfering with the Notch pathway and/or via the intronic miR126. Less is known about its effects on VEGF signaling. We wanted to investigate the role of epidermal growth factor-like domain 7 (EGFL7) in VEGF-driven angiogenesis using an ex vivo Matrigel-embedded mouse eye cup assay and siRNA mediated knockdown of EGFL7 by siRNA. Our results suggested that VEGF-induced vascular tube formation was significantly impaired after siRNA downregulation of EGFL7. In addition, knockdown of EGFL7 suppressed VEGF upregulation of phospho-Akt and phospho-Erk(1/2) in endothelial cells, but did not alter VEGFR phosphorylation and neuropilin-1 protein expression or miR126 expression. Thus, in conclusion, EGFL7 is required for VEGF upregulation of the Akt/Erk (1/2) pathway during angiogenesis, and may represent a new therapeutic target in diseases of pathological neovascularization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the effects of nilvadipine on the progression of central visual field defect in retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Design: Prospective, randomized, nonmasked, single-center trial. Methods: Patients with RP were randomly divided into a treated group receiving oral nilvadipine at 4 mg/day for ≥30 months and a control group receiving tocopherol nicotinate at 300 mg/day, helenien at 15 mg/day or no medication for the same periods. Progression of RP was evaluated using the 10-2 SITA Fast Program of the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, and regression coefficients calculated from the time courses of mean deviation (MD slope) were compared between groups. Results: Nineteen patients in the treated group and 14 patients in the control group completed the follow-up for ≥30 months. The mean (±standard deviation) duration of observation was 48.8 ± 11.8 months (median 48 months, range 30-66 months) for the treated group and 49.2 ± 18.1 months (median 48 months, range 30-90 months) for the control group (p = 0.94). Mean (±standard error of the mean, SEM) regression coefficients of the averaged MD values for the initial 30 months were -0.35 ± 0.17 dB/year in the treated group and -0.75 ± 0.06 dB/year in the control group (p < 0.01). Mean (±SEM) MD slopes for total observational periods were -0.49 ± 0.17 dB/year in the treated group and -0.89 ± 0.16 dB/year in the control group (mean ± SEM, p = 0.042). Conclusion: Nilvadipine at 4 mg/day significantly retarded progression of central visual field defects in RP in this small patient series. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]