Search

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of polypectomy with cutting current (PCC) for colorectal polyps, compared with cold snare polypectomy (CSP).The study design was a singlecenter randomized controlled trial. We included patients with one or more non-pedunculated colorectal polyps of 6 mm or more and less than 10 mm. The primary endpoint was the proportion of complete resection of the muscularis mucosae.Twenty-seven patients (37 polyps) were assigned to the CSP group, and 22 (29 polyps) were assigned to the PCC group. The number of polyps that could achieve complete muscularis mucosae resection was 7 (20.0%) in the CSP group and 24 (92.3%) in the PCC group, and the rate of complete muscularis mucosae resection was statistically significantly higher in the PCC group.PCC is a safer procedure because it can remove the muscularis mucosae more reliably.

A 53-year-old woman visited the hospital of this study complaining of constipation. Colonoscopy revealed a circumferential tumor with severe stenosis, and a computed tomography scan showed neoplastic lesions in the rectum and right breast area. Histology was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, requiring differentiation between type 4 and metastatic rectal cancer. Additional immunohistochemical tests were performed and a rectal metastasis of breast cancer diagnosis was made. Hormonal therapy was effective and the tumor volume was significantly reduced. Rectal metastasis of breast cancer is said to be rare. However, in the case of patients diagnosed with breast cancer or with a history of breast cancer, considering the possibility of gastrointestinal metastasis using histopathological examination is important.

The patient was a 90-year-old male. For early gastric cancer on the posterior wall of the upper gastric body, which is not indicated for endoscope treatment, chemotherapy with arterial infusion was carried out at other facilities at the request of the patient and his family. Thereafter, he suffered a relapse during follow-up, for which our hospital carried out endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD). The outcome was a resection without cure. Taking into consideration his age and the fact that the scoring system for early gastric cancer with excised lesions without cure by ESD indicated a medium risk, we carried out no additional treatment but did conduct a follow-up. There has been no recurrence for 15 months following surgery. ESD does not provide evidence with regard to recurrence after other treatments. This patient had a scar following arterial infusion chemotherapy and a local injection solution was not infused into the submucosa right under the lesion. Although the treatment of exfoliation was difficult due to fibrosis of the submucosa, en-bloc resection was possible without any complications.

Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically difficult and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ESD using a multibending endoscope to treat superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms.Methods Patients with a single early gastric cancer who met the absolute or expanded indications for ESD according to the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo ESD using a conventional endoscope (C-ESD) or a multibending endoscope (M-ESD). Randomization was stratified by ESD operator experience and tumor location. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time, calculated as the time from the start of submucosal injection to complete removal of the tumor.Results 60 patients were analyzed (30 C-ESD, 30 M-ESD). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ESD procedure times for M-ESD and C-ESD were 34.6 (SD 17.2) and 47.2 (SD 26.7) minutes, respectively (P = 0.03). Muscle layer damage occurred significantly less frequently with M-ESD (0.2 [SD 0.7] vs. 0.7 [SD 1.0]; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in procedure time or damage to muscle layers for tumors located in the lower third of the stomach.Conclusions ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with the multibending endoscope and fewer muscles were damaged. We recommend multibending endoscopy for ESD in the upper and middle thirds of the stomach to reduce procedure time and incidence of complications.