Search

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between breastfeeding and postpartum maternal weight change. Method: This study used data from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS), an ongoing nationwide birth cohort study. Participants were categorized into two groups: full breastfeeding (FB) and non-full breastfeeding (NFB) groups. Postpartum weight changes between the FB (n = 26,340) and NFB (n = 38,129) groups were compared. Results: At 6 months postpartum, mean weight retention was significantly lower in the FB group than in the NFB group (0.2 vs 0.8 kg, respectively, p<0.001). Weight retention differed by pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), with postpartum weights of overweight (pre-pregnancy BMI 25.0–29.9) and obese (pre-pregnancy BMI ≥30.0) participants being lower than pre-pregnancy weight; this trend was more pronounced in the FB group than in the NFB group (overweight: −2.2 vs −0.7 kg, respectively; obese: −4.8 vs −3.4 kg, respectively). Factors affecting weight retention at 6 months postpartum were weight gain during pregnancy (β = 0.43; p<0.001), pre-pregnancy BMI (β = −0.147; p<0.001) and feeding method. FB resulted in lower weight retention than NFB (β = −0.107; p<0.001). Conclusion: Breastfeeding reduced maternal weight retention, which was greater in mothers who were obese before pregnancy. For obese women, active breastfeeding may improve their health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to classify patients with placental abruption (PA) into those with a history of PA (recurrence group) and those without a history (first-occurrence group), and compare the two groups to investigate whether perinatal outcomes differ between first-time PA and recurrent PA.Materials and Methods: Subjects include 6475 patients diagnosed with PA from the Pregnancy Birth Registry System of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Patients were classified into recurrence group and first-occurrence group. Perinatal outcomes were compared between 141 patients in the recurrence group and 705 patients in the first-occurrence group with 1:5 propensity score matching, adjusting for maternal age, history of smoking, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and premature rupture of membranes as covariates.Results: There were no cases of maternal mortality in either groups, and the perinatal mortality rate did not exhibit a significant difference. Gestational age at delivery was significantly earlier in the recurrence group than in the first-occurrence group (35.3 vs 37.9 weeks, p < .001). The rate of preterm delivery at less than both 32 and 37 weeks of gestation was significantly higher in the recurrence group. The rate of UmApH < 7.1 and 5 min Apgar score < 7 were significantly higher in the recurrence group (21 vs 13%, p = .020, 20% vs 10%, p = .003, respectively).Conclusions: The results suggest that recurrent PA occurs at an earlier gestational age and follows a more severe course than the first occurrence of PA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to examine how physical activity (PA) before and during pregnancy influences pregnancy outcomes, particularly preterm delivery and mode of delivery. Methods: This study was based on the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. A total of 92,796 pregnant women who gave birth to live singleton babies were included. Information on mean PA per week during pregnancy was extracted from the responses to questionnaires completed by women during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Information on PA before pregnancy was obtained from questionnaires answered based on recall at participation. The level of PA was stratified into the following quartiles for categorical analysis: Very low, Low, Medium, and High. Pregnancy outcomes, gestational age at delivery (whether preterm delivery or not), and mode of delivery (spontaneous, instrumental, or caesarean delivery) were compared between the different groups adjusted for multiple covariates. Results: With respect to PA during pregnancy, the risk of preterm delivery and instrumental delivery increased significantly in the Very low group compared to that in the Medium group (odds ratios [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.29; OR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.03–1.22, respectively). Moreover, the risks of caesarean delivery in the Low group and instrumental delivery in the High group were significantly higher than the risks in the Medium group (OR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.00–1.15; OR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.02–1.22, respectively). In contrast, with respect to PA before pregnancy, there were no statistically significant differences when the other groups were compared to the Medium group. Conclusions: Pre-pregnancy PA has no negative effects on preterm birth and caesarean delivery. In contrast, both may be affected by PA during pregnancy because a low level of PA appears to slightly increase the risk of preterm delivery and operative delivery (caesarean and instrumental). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]