1. In vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) by PBTK modeling for animal-free risk assessment approaches of potential endocrine-disrupting compounds
- Author
-
Bennard van Ravenzwaay, Barbara Birk, Caroline Gomes, Rene Zbranek, Tabitha Williford, Christian Haase, Tzutzuy Ramirez Hernandez, Robert Landsiedel, and Eric Fabian
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Male ,medicine.drug_class ,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis ,In silico ,Administration, Oral ,010501 environmental sciences ,Pharmacology ,Endocrine Disruptors ,Toxicology ,Animal Testing Alternatives ,01 natural sciences ,Models, Biological ,Risk Assessment ,Androgen receptor binding ,03 medical and health sciences ,Trenbolone ,In vivo ,Yeasts ,medicine ,Toxicokinetics ,Animals ,Humans ,Methyltestosterone ,Rats, Wistar ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,Chemistry ,General Medicine ,In vitro ,030104 developmental biology ,Liver ,Receptors, Estrogen ,Estrogen ,Receptors, Androgen ,Female ,medicine.drug - Abstract
While in vitro testing is used to identify hazards of chemicals, nominal in vitro assay concentrations may misrepresent potential in vivo effects and do not provide dose–response data which can be used for a risk assessment. We used reverse dosimetry to compare in vitro effect concentrations-to-in vivo doses causing toxic effects related to endocrine disruption. Ten compounds (acetaminophen, bisphenol A, caffeine, 17α-ethinylestradiol, fenarimol, flutamide, genistein, ketoconazole, methyltestosterone, and trenbolone) have been tested in the yeast estrogen screening (YES) or yeast androgen-screening (YAS) assays for estrogen and androgen receptor binding, as well as the H295R assay (OECD test guideline no. 456) for potential interaction with steroidogenesis. With the assumption of comparable concentration–response ratios of these effects in the applied in vitro systems and the in vivo environment, the lowest observed effect concentrations from these assays were extrapolated to oral doses (LOELs) by reverse dosimetry. For extrapolation, an eight-compartment Physiologically Based Toxicokinetic (PBTK) rat model based on in vitro and in silico input data was used. The predicted LOEL was then compared to the LOEL actually observed in corresponding in vivo studies (YES/YAS assay versus uterotrophic or Hershberger assay and steroidogenesis assay versus pubertal assay or generation studies). This evaluation resulted in 6 out of 10 compounds for which the predicted LOELs were in the same order of magnitude as the actual in vivo LOELs. For four compounds, the predicted LOELs differed by more than tenfold from the actual in vivo LOELs. In conclusion, these data demonstrate the applicability of reverse dosimetry using a simple PBTK model to serve in vitro–in silico-based risk assessment, but also identified cases and test substance were the applied methods are insufficient.
- Published
- 2018