Search

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a deadly neuroendocrine malignancy, notorious for its rapid tumor growth, early metastasis, and relatively cold immune environment. Only standard chemotherapies and a few immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for SCLC treatment, revealing an urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches. Moreover, SCLC has been recently recognized as a malignancy with high intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity, which explains the modest response rate in some patients and the early relapse. Molecular subtypes defined by the expression of lineage-specific transcription factors (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and, in some studies, YAP1) or immune-related genes display different degrees of neuroendocrine differentiation, immune cell infiltration, and response to treatment. Despite the complexity of this malignancy, a few biomarkers and targets have been identified and many promising drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials. In this review, we integrate the current progress on the genomic landscape of this shapeshifting malignancy, the characteristics and treatment vulnerabilities of each subtype, and promising drugs in clinical phases.

BACKGROUND: We report the final results of the randomized phase 2 FIGHT trial that evaluated bemarituzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody selective for fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b), plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with FGFR2b-positive (2 + /3 + membranous staining by immunohistochemistry), HER-2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC). METHODS: Patients received bemarituzumab (15 mg/kg) or placebo once every 2 weeks with an additional bemarituzumab (7.5 mg/kg) or placebo dose on cycle 1 day 8. All patients received mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and safety. Efficacy was evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 24 months. RESULTS: In the bemarituzumab-mFOLFOX6 (N = 77) and placebo-mFOLFOX6 (N = 78) arms, respectively, 59.7% and 66.7% of patients were FGFR2b-positive in ≥ 10% of tumor cells. The median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 9.5 months (7.3-13.7) with bemarituzumab-mFOLFOX6 and 7.4 months (5.7-8.4) with placebo-mFOLFOX6 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI 0.49-1.08); median OS (95% CI) was 19.2 (13.6-24.2) and 13.5 (9.3-15.9) months, respectively (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.52-1.14). Observed efficacy in FGFR2b-positive GC in ≥ 10% of tumor cells was: PFS: HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.26-0.73); OS: HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.31-0.85). No new safety findings were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In FGFR2b-positive advanced GC, the combination of bemarituzumab-mFOLFOX6 led to numerically longer median PFS and OS compared with mFOLFOX6 alone. Efficacy was more pronounced with FGFR2b overexpression in ≥ 10% of tumor cells. Confirmatory phase 3 trials are ongoing (NCT05052801, NCT05111626). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03694522.

The present review demonstrates the major tumor suppressor genes, including TP53, CDKN2A and SMAD4, associated with pancreatic cancer. Each genes role, prevalence and impact on tumor development and progression are analyzed, focusing on the intricate molecular landscape of pancreatic cancer. In addition, this review underscores the prognostic significance of specific mutations, such as loss of TP53, and explores some potential targeted therapies tailored to these molecular signatures. The findings highlight the importance of genomic analyses for risk assessment, early detection and the design of personalized treatment approaches in pancreatic cancer. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of the molecular intricacies of pancreatic tumors, paving the way for more effective and tailored therapeutic interventions.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a heterogeneous cancer composed of distinct molecular and pathologic subtypes. Unfortunately, MPM is aggressive, and current therapies for advanced, unresectable disease remain limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Our understanding of the genomic landscape of MPM is steadily growing, while the discovery of effective targeted therapies in MPM has advanced more slowly than in other solid tumors. Given the prevalence of alterations in tumor suppressor genes in MPM, it has been challenging to identify actionable targets. However, efforts to characterize the genetic signatures in MPM over the last decade have led to a range of novel targeted therapeutics entering early-phase clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the advancements made thus far in targeted systemic therapies in MPM and the future direction of targeted strategies in patients with advanced MPM.

On April 18, 2024, the Food and Drug Administration approved alectinib as an adjuvant treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after tumor resection. This approval was grounded in the outcomes of the ALINA trial, which demonstrated that alectinib significantly enhances disease-free survival compared to traditional platinum-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. The ALINA trial is notable not just for advancing ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into the adjuvant setting but also for its innovative approach of comparing them to adjuvant chemotherapy, distinguishing it from other landmark trials.

On December 22, 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the biologics license application for patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) for priority review. This treatment is aimed at adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutations, who have received at least two prior systemic therapies. Approval of patritumab deruxtecan would mark it as the first HER3 targeted therapy in the United States. This prioritization by the FDA is grounded in compelling results from the global Phase II HERTHENA-Lung01 trial, wherein HER3-DXd exhibited clinically meaningful efficacy, achieving a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.5 months in patients with heavily treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC. A pivotal question remains: Is a mPFS of 5.5 months sufficient in the context of the evolving first-line landscape observed in the FLAURA-2 and MARIPOSA trials?

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-secreted nanovesicles that play an important role in long-range cell-cell communication. Although EVs pose a promising alternative to cell-based therapy, targeted in vivo delivery still falls short. Many studies have explored the surface modification of EVs to enhance their targeting capabilities. However, to our knowledge, there are no standardized practices to confirm the successful surface modification of EVs or calculate the degree of conjugation on EV surfaces (conjugation efficiency). These pieces of information are essential in the reproducibility of targeted EV therapeutics and the determination of optimized conjugation conditions for EVs to see significant therapeutic effects in vitro and in vivo. This review will discuss the vast array of techniques adopted, technologies developed, and efficiency definitions made by studies that have calculated EV/nanoparticle surface conjugation efficiency and how differences between studies may contribute to differently reported conjugation efficiencies.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions are a rare subtype of EGFR mutations that do not respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors developed for sensitizing mutations. In 2021, two drugs, amivantamab and mobocertinib each received FDA accelerated approval for second line use after platinum based therapy. These drugs were then brought to first line setting clinical trials; PAPILLON and EXCLAIM2. PAPILLON, which compared amivantamab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy was positive, whereas EXCLAIM2, which compared mobocertinib to chemotherapy was negative. The PAPILLON regimen received subsequent FDA approval. In this commentary, we review the details of PAPILLON and also discuss why the rival trial, EXCLAIM2, may have failed.

Targeted therapies, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have revolutionized the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the emergence of resistance to EGFR TKIs especially the third generation TKIs such as osimertinib remains a major clinical challenge. As a broader strategy for combating resistance, several clinical trials have explored the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)+chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Until now, the ORIENT-31 and IMpower150 trials suggested that ICIs+ chemotherapy may be more effective than chemotherapy alone after failure of EGFR-TKIs (although ORIENT-31 was negative for overall survival [OS] and IMpower150 was a subset analysis, so the study was not powered to detect a difference); however, the CheckMate-722 trial yielded disappointing results. Thus, the results of this global trial KEYNOTE-789 were highly anticipated.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive subtype, presents a critical challenge due to the absence of approved targeted therapies. Hence, there is an urgent need to identify effective therapeutic targets for this condition. While epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is prominently expressed in TNBC and recognized as a therapeutic target, anti-EGFR therapies have yet to gain approval for breast cancer treatment due to their associated side effects and limited efficacy. Here, we discovered that intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) exhibits elevated expression levels in metastatic breast cancer and serves as a pivotal binding adaptor for EGFR activation, playing a crucial role in malignant progression. The activation of EGFR by tumor-expressed ICAM-1 initiates biased signaling within the JAK1/STAT3 pathway, consequently driving epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and facilitating heightened metastasis without influencing tumor growth. Remarkably, ICAM-1-neutralizing antibody treatment significantly suppressed cancer metastasis in a breast cancer orthotopic xenograft mouse model. In conclusion, our identification of ICAM-1 as a novel tumor intrinsic regulator of EGFR activation offers valuable insights for the development of TNBC-specific anti-EGFR therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research was intended to compare the clinical efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in conjunction with lenvatinib and PD1 inhibitors to first-line systemic chemotherapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC). The research enrolled advanced ICC patients who underwent HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD1 inhibitor(n = 51) or first-line systemic chemotherapy(cisplatin + gemcitabine, n = 39) between July 2020 to January 2023 in Zhongshan People's Hospital.Their clinical outcomes were assessed through measurement of parameters encompassing objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median duration of response (mDOR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). In accordance with the RECIST1.1, the ORR in the HAIC + L + P and SC groups was 43.1% and 20.5%, while the DCR was 90.2% and 69.2%, respectively (P = 0.04 and = 0.02, respectively). The change in the maximum diameter of intrahepatic target lesions in patients before and after treatment and the diameter of intrahepatic tumors in the HAIC + L + P group were sharply smaller versus the SC group (P < 0.001). The HAIC + L + P group had prolonged mOS (16.8 months vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.01) and mPFS (12.0 months vs. 6.9 months, P < 0.01) in comparison with the SC group. Compared to first-line systemic chemotherapy(cisplatin + gemcitabine), HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors contributes to improvement of tumor response and prolongation of OS and PFS in advanced ICC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Black patients with cancer are less likely to receive precision cancer treatments than White patients and are underrepresented in clinical trials. To address these disparities, the study aimed to develop and pilot‐test a digital intervention to improve Black patients' knowledge about precision oncology and clinical trials, empower patients to increase relevant discussion, and promote informed decision‐making. Methods: A community‐engaged approach, including a Community Advisory Board and two rounds of key informant interviews with Black patients with cancer, their relatives, and providers (n = 48) was used to develop and refine the multimedia digital intervention. Thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. The intervention was then pilot‐tested with 30 Black patients with cancer to assess feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, knowledge, decision self‐efficacy, and patient empowerment; Wilcoxon matched pairs signed‐rank test was used to analyze quantitative data. Results: The digital tool was found to be feasible, acceptable, and culturally appropriate. Key informants shared their preferences and recommendations for the digital intervention and helped improve cultural appropriateness through user and usability testing. In the pilot test, appreciable improvement was found in participants' knowledge about precision oncology (z = –2.04, p =.052), knowledge about clinical trials (z = –3.14, p =.001), and decisional self‐efficacy for targeted/immune therapy (z = –1.96, p =.0495). Conclusions: The digital intervention could be a promising interactive decision‐support tool for increasing Black patients' participation in clinical trials and receipt of precision treatments, including immunotherapy. Its use in clinical practice may reduce disparities in oncology care and research. Plain Language Summary: We developed a digital interactive decision support tool for Black patients with cancer by convening a Community Advisory Board and conducting interviews with Black patients with cancer, their relatives, and providers.We then pilot‐tested the intervention with newly diagnosed Black patients with cancer and found appreciable improvement in participants' knowledge about precision oncology, knowledge about clinical trials, and confidence in making decisions for targeted/immune therapy.Our digital tool has great potential to be an affordable and scalable solution for empowering and educating Black patients with cancer to help them make informed decisions about precision oncology and clinical trials and ultimately reducing racial disparities. We developed and pilot‐tested a digital intervention to promote informed decision‐making regarding precision oncology and clinical trial participation among Black patients with cancer. Key informant interviews and pilot‐testing suggest that the intervention could be a promising interactive decision‐support tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with the FMS‐related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD) mutation have a poorer prognosis, and treatment with FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been hindered by resistance mechanisms. One such mechanism is known as adaptive resistance, in which downstream signaling pathways are reactivated after initial inhibition. Past work has shown that FLT3/ITD cells undergo adaptive resistance through the reactivation of extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) signaling within 24 h of sustained FLT3 inhibition. We investigated the mechanism(s) responsible for this ERK reactivation and hypothesized that targeting tyrosine‐protein kinase receptor UFO (AXL), another receptor tyrosine kinase that has been implicated in cancer resistance, may overcome the adaptive ERK reactivation. Experiments revealed that AXL is upregulated and activated in FLT3/ITD cell lines mere hours after commencing TKI treatment. AXL inhibition combined with FLT3 inhibition to decrease the ERK signal rebound and to exert greater anti‐leukemia effects than with either treatment alone. Finally, we observed that TKI‐induced AXL upregulation occurs in patient samples, and combined inhibition of both AXL and FLT3 increased efficacy in our in vivo models. Taken together, these data suggest that AXL plays a role in adaptive resistance in FLT3/ITD AML and that combined AXL and FLT3 inhibition might improve FLT3/ITD AML patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the main type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is often associated with the deletion or mutation of the von Hippel Lindau (VHL) gene, enhancement of glucose and lipid metabolism, and heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment. VHL alterations in RCC cells lead to the activation of hypoxiainducible factors and their downstream target vascular endothelial growth factor, and to the reprogramming of multiple cell death pathways and metabolic weakness, including ferroptosis, which are associated with targeted therapy or immunotherapy. The changes in biological metabolites (e.g., iron and lipids) support ferroptosis as a potential therapeutic strategy for RCC, while iron metabolism and ferroptosis regulation have been examined as anti-RCC agents in numerous studies, and various ferroptosis-related molecules have been shown to be related to the metastasis and prognosis of ccRCC. For example, glutathione peroxidase 4 and glutaminase inhibitors can inhibit pyrimidine synthesis and increase reactive oxygen species levels in VHLdeficient RCC cells. In addition, the release of damage-associated molecular patterns by tumor cells undergoing ferroptosis also mediates antitumor immunity, and immune therapy can synergize with targeted therapy or radiotherapy through ferroptosis. However, Inducing ferroptosis not only suppresses cancer, but also promotes cancer development due to its potential negative effects on anti-cancer immunity. Therefore, ferroptosis and various tumor microenviroment-related molecules may co-occur during the development and treatment of RCC, and further understanding of the interactions, core targets, and related drugs of ferroptosis may provide new combination drug strategies for RCC treatment. Here we summarize the key genes and compounds on ferroptosis and RCC in order to envision future treatment strategies and to provide sufficient information for overcoming RCC resistance through ferroptosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a leading cause of hematopoietic cancer-related mortality, accounting for 20% of deaths. MM-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy, and since 2015, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved five targeted drugs. However, their cardiovascular safety has not been comprehensively evaluated. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between MM-targeted therapy and cardiovascular adverse events (AEs). Methods: Disproportionality analysis was conducted on reports from the FDA AE Reporting System database from 2014 to the second quarter of 2023. Cardiovascular AEs were grouped into nine narrow categories using the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Queries (SMQs). Results: A total of 3,228 cardiovascular AE cases involving MM-targeted therapy were extracted and analyzed. Significant disproportionality was identified for daratumumab, elotuzumab, and isatuximab. Among the nine narrow SMQ categories, the three most reported cardiovascular AEs were cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrhythmias, and embolic and thrombotic events. Noninfectious myocarditis/pericarditis, cardiac arrhythmias, and embolic and thrombotic events exhibited the strongest signal strengths. The cardiovascular AE risk was higher within the first month and gradually decreased thereafter; however, it increased rapidly again after 1 year. This trend was observed for all cardiovascular AEs. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the log-rank test revealed that isatuximab and elotuzumab exhibited a significantly lower probability of cardiovascular AEs than daratumumab (p < 0.001). Conclusions: MM-targeted therapy is significantly associated with an increased risk of previously unknown cardiovascular AE profiles, with the range and onset differing among various drugs, thereby warranting specific monitoring and appropriate management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The connections between cancer stem cells (CSCs) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is critical in cancer initiation, progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance, making it a focal point in cancer theragnosis. This review provides a panorama of associations and regulation pathways between CSCs and EMT, highlighting their significance in cancer. The molecular mechanisms underlined EMT are thoroughly explored, including the involvement of key transcription factors and signaling pathways. In addition, the roles of CSCs and EMT in tumor biology and therapy resistance, is further examined in this review. The clinical implications of CSCs-EMT interplay are explored, including identifying mesenchymal-state CSC subpopulations using advanced research methods and developing targeted therapies such as inhibitors and combination treatments. Overall, understanding the reciprocal relationship between EMT and CSCs holds excellent potential for informing the development of personalized therapies and ultimately improving patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive solid tumors. As a systemic disease, despite the improvement of multi-modality treatment strategies, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer was not improved dramatically. For resectable or borderline resectable patients, the surgical strategy centered on improving R0 resection rate is consensus; however, the role of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable patients and the optimal neoadjuvant therapy of chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in borderline resectable patients were debated. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine/capecitabine or mFOLFIRINOX is recommended regardless of the margin status. Chemotherapy as the first-line treatment strategy for advanced or metastatic patients included FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, or NALIRIFOX regimens whereas 5-FU plus liposomal irinotecan was the only standard of care second-line therapy. Immunotherapy is an innovative therapy although anti-PD-1 antibody is currently the only agent approved by for MSI-H, dMMR, or TMB-high solid tumors, which represent a very small subset of pancreatic cancers. Combination strategies to increase the immunogenicity and to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may sensitize pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy. Targeted therapies represented by PARP and KRAS inhibitors are also under investigation, showing benefits in improving progression-free survival and objective response rate. This review discusses the current treatment modalities and highlights innovative therapies for pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary For autoimmune disease (AD) and autoinflammatory disease (AID)‐related haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) (AD/AID‐HLH), there is still a lack of standardized treatment. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the main treatment currently; however, 37.9% to 61% of patients fail to achieve effective control of HLH, making it urgent to find novel treatment strategies. We conducted a retrospective, single‐centre study examining ruxolitinib (RUX)‐based regimen in children with AD/AID‐HLH. Patients were first treated with RUX monotherapy, and additional treatments including methylprednisolone and etoposide were added sequentially when the disease could not be controlled. The study included 26 patients with a median follow‐up of 23.9 months, of whom 15 had prior treatments. The overall response rate at week 8 with the RUX‐based regimen was 96.2%, with 92.3% attaining complete response (CR) and 3.9% attaining partial response. The 2‐year overall survival rate was 96.2% (95% CI, 80.4% to 99.9%). During RUX monotherapy, 46.1% of patients achieved CR as the best response, with a median first response time to RUX of 2 days. Additionally, 53.8% of patients required additional GCs and 23.1% required etoposide chemotherapy. All observed adverse events were manageable and acceptable. Overall, our study supports the efficacy and safety of the RUX‐based regimen in children with AD/AID‐HLH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Most pediatric low-grade-gliomas (LGG) and some high-gradegliomas (HGG) have alterations in the RAS/MAPK pathway. Promising high tumor response rates were achieved using BRAF/MEK inhibitors, however data on their use in low-middle-income-countries (LMICs) are limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our Jordanian experience of using compassionate BRAF/MEK inhibitors in treating children with gliomas. We reviewed patients' clinical characteristics, tumor response, and side effects. Results: Twenty patients (13 males, 7 females) were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 8.3 years (0.3-18.9years). There were fifteen LGGs, three HGGs and two grade-2 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA-2). Fifteen tumors were supratentorial, three posterior fossa/brainstem, one diffuse-glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) and one spinal. Five tumors were metastatic. Except for one patient with neurofibromatosis, ten patients underwent partial resection and nine had biopsy. All patients, except three, received BRAF/MEK inhibitors after initial standard chemo/radiotherapy. Seven LGGs had BRAF-mutation, six had BRAF-fusion, and two were empirically treated (one neurofibromatosis and one DLGNT). Fourteen LGGs were treated with 1-4 chemotherapy regimens before BRAF/MEK inhibitors' use; all had partial/stable response on targeted therapy at a median of 1.9 years (0.5-5.4years). Two patients with BRAFv600E-mutated/CDKN2A deleted PXA-2, had progression following resection, and experienced stable/partial response at 9 months of dabrafenib use. Two patients with HGGs had BRAFv600E-mutation, and one had an FGFR-mutation. All three patients with HGG had temporary stable/partial response, two with significant clinical improvement. At a median of 2.7 years (1.3-3.2years), all patients experienced tumor progression, and two died. Eight patients (40%) developed acneiform rash, three (15%) paronychia, and one had significant panniculitis and fatigue. Six patients (30%) needed dose-reduction. Nine patients had temporary drug interruptions [due to side effects (5) and drug shortage (4)]. Two patients who stopped trametinib due to side effects (significant acneiform rash/paronychia and intracranial bleeding) did not experience progression. Conclusions: Our experience with BRAF/MEK inhibitors' use was positive achieving response in all LGGs and provided sustained response with good quality of life for patients with HGG. Cost effectiveness analyses and patients' satisfaction comparisons with chemotherapy are needed to evaluate the routine use of these drugs in LMICs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex, dynamic network of multiple macromolecules that serve as a crucial structural and physical scaffold for neighboring cells. In the tumor microenvironment (TME), ECM proteins play a significant role in mediating cellular communication between cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Revealing the ECM modification of the TME necessitates the intricate signaling cascades that transpire among diverse cell populations and ECM proteins. The advent of single-cell sequencing has enabled the identification and refinement of specific cellular subpopulations, which has substantially enhanced our comprehension of the intricate milieu and given us a high-resolution perspective on the diversity of ECM proteins. However, it is essential to integrate single-cell data and establish a coherent framework. In this regard, we present a comprehensive review of the relationships among ECM, TAMs, and CAFs. This encompasses insights into the ECM proteins released by TAMs and CAFs, signaling integration in the TAM-ECM-CAF axis, and the potential applications and limitations of targeted therapies for CAFs. This review serves as a reliable resource for focused therapeutic strategies while highlighting the crucial role of ECM proteins as intermediates in the TME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Understanding the resistance mechanisms of tumor is crucial for advancing cancer therapies. The prospective MATCH-R trial (NCT02517892), led by Gustave Roussy, aimed to characterize resistance mechanisms to cancer treatments through molecular analysis of fresh tumor biopsies. This report presents the genomic data analysis of the MATCH-R study conducted from 2015 to 2022 and focuses on targeted therapies. Methods: The study included resistant metastatic patients (pts) who accepted an image-guided tumor biopsy. After evaluation of tumor content (TC) in frozen tissue biopsies, targeted NGS (10 < TC < 30%) or Whole Exome Sequencing and RNA sequencing (TC > 30%) were performed before and/or after the anticancer therapy. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were established by implanting tumor fragments into NOD scid gamma mice and amplified up to five passages. Results: A total of 1,120 biopsies were collected from 857 pts with the most frequent tumor types being lung (38.8%), digestive (16.3%) and prostate (14.1%) cancer. Molecular targetable driver were identified in 30.9% (n = 265/857) of the patients, with EGFR (41.5%), FGFR2/3 (15.5%), ALK (11.7%), BRAF (6.8%), and KRAS (5.7%) being the most common altered genes. Furthermore, 66.0% (n = 175/265) had a biopsy at progression on targeted therapy. Among resistant cases, 41.1% (n = 72/175) had no identified molecular mechanism, 32.0% (n = 56/175) showed on-target resistance, and 25.1% (n = 44/175) exhibited a by-pass resistance mechanism. Molecular profiling of the 44 patients with by-pass resistance identified 51 variants, with KRAS (13.7%), PIK3CA (11.8%), PTEN (11.8%), NF2 (7.8%), AKT1 (5.9%), and NF1 (5.9%) being the most altered genes. Treatment was tailored for 45% of the patients with a resistance mechanism identified leading to an 11 months median extension of clinical benefit. A total of 341 biopsies were implanted in mice, successfully establishing 136 PDX models achieving a 39.9% success rate. PDX models are available for EGFR (n = 31), FGFR2/3 (n = 26), KRAS (n = 18), ALK (n = 16), BRAF (n = 6) and NTRK (n = 2) driven cancers. These models closely recapitulate the biology of the original tumors in term of molecular alterations and pharmacological status, and served as valuable models to validate overcoming treatment strategies. Conclusion: The MATCH-R study highlights the feasibility of on purpose image guided tumor biopsies and PDX establishment to characterize resistance mechanisms and guide personalized therapies to improve outcomes in pre-treated metastatic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent malignant tumor and ranks as the second leading cause of death among cancer patients worldwide. Due to its hidden nature and difficulty in detection, GC has a high incidence and poor prognosis. Traditional treatment methods such as systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical resection are commonly used, but they often fail to achieve satisfactory curative effects, resulting in a very low 5-year survival rate for GC patients. Currently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy are prominent areas of research both domestically and internationally. These methods hold promise for the treatment of GC. This article focuses on the signaling pathways associated with the development of GC, as well as the recent advancements and applications of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The aim is to provide fresh insights for the clinical treatment of GC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is widely acknowledged that there is a considerable number of oncogenic mutations within the Ras superfamily of small GTPases which are the driving force behind a multitude of cancers. Ras proteins mediate a plethora of kinase pathways, including the MAPK, PI3K, and Ral pathways. Since Ras was considered undruggable until recently, pharmacological targeting of pathways downstream of Ras has been attempted to varying success, though drug resistance has often proven an issue. Nuances between kinase pathway activation in the presence of various Ras mutants are thought to contribute to the resistance, however, the reasoning behind activation of different pathways in different Ras mutational contexts is yet to be fully elucidated. Indeed, such disparities often depend on cancer type and disease progression. However, we are in a revolutionary age of Ras mutant targeted therapy, with directtargeting KRAS-G12C inhibitors revolutionising the field and achieving FDAapproval in recent years. However, these are only beneficial in a subset of patients. Approximately 90% of Ras-mutant cancers are not KRAS-G12C mutant, and therefore raises the question as to whether other distinct amino acid substitutions within Ras may one day be targetable in a similar manner, and indeed whether better understanding of the downstream pathways these various mutants activate could further improve therapy. Here, we discuss the favouring of kinase pathways across an array of Ras-mutant oncogenic contexts and assess recent advances in pharmacological targeting of various Ras mutants. Ultimately, we will examine the utility of individualised pharmacological approaches to Rasmediated cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Liver cancer represents a substantial global health challenge, contributing significantly to worldwide morbidity and mortality. It has long been understood that tumors are not composed solely of cancerous cells, but also include a variety of normal cells within their structure. These tumor-associated normal cells encompass vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and various inflammatory cells, including neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, mast cells, eosinophils, and lymphocytes. Additionally, tumor cells engage in complex interactions with stromal cells and elements of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Initially, the components of what is now known as the tumor microenvironment (TME) were thought to be passive bystanders in the processes of tumor proliferation and local invasion. However, recent research has significantly advanced our understanding of the TME's active role in tumor growth and metastasis. Tumor progression is now known to be driven by an intricate imbalance of positive and negative regulatory signals, primarily influenced by specific growth factors produced by both inflammatory and neoplastic cells. This review article explores the latest developments and future directions in understanding how the TME modulates liver cancer, with the aim of informing the design of novel therapies that target critical components of the TME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Protein kinases have essential responsibilities in controlling several cellular processes, and their abnormal regulation is strongly related to the development of cancer. The implementation of protein kinase inhibitors has significantly transformed cancer therapy by modifying treatment strategies. These inhibitors have received substantial FDA clearance in recent decades. Protein kinases have emerged as primary objectives for therapeutic interventions, particularly in the context of cancer treatment. At present, 69 therapeutics have been approved by the FDA that target approximately 24 protein kinases, which are specifically prescribed for the treatment of neoplastic illnesses. These novel agents specifically inhibit certain protein kinases, such as receptor protein-tyrosine kinases, protein-serine/threonine kinases, dual-specificity kinases, nonreceptor protein-tyrosine kinases, and receptor protein-tyrosine kinases. This review presents a comprehensive overview of novel targets of kinase inhibitors, with a specific focus on cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The majority of the reviewed studies commenced with an assessment of cancer cell lines and concluded with a comprehensive biological evaluation of individual kinase targets. The reviewed articles provide detailed information on the structural features of potent anticancer agents and their specific activity, which refers to their ability to selectively inhibit cancer-promoting kinases including CDKs and EGFR. Additionally, the latest FDA-approved anticancer agents targeting these enzymes were highlighted accordingly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a challenging subtype of breast cancer characterized by the absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 expression, leading to limited treatment options and a poorer prognosis. TNBC is particularly prevalent in premenopausal African-descent women and is associated with aggressive tumor behavior and higher metastatic potential. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are abundantly present within the TNBC microenvironment and play pivotal roles in promoting tumor growth, progression, and metastasis through various mechanisms, including immune suppression and enhancement of angiogenesis. This review provides an in-depth overview of TNBC, focusing on its epidemiology, its molecular characteristics, and the critical influence of TAMs. It discusses the pathological and molecular aspects that define TNBC's aggressive nature and reviews current and emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting these dynamics. Special attention is given to the role of TAMs, exploring their potential as therapeutic targets due to their significant impact on tumor behavior and patient outcomes. This review aims to highlight the complexities of the TNBC landscape and to present the innovative approaches that are currently being pursued to improve therapeutic efficacy and patient survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer therapies have evolved from traditional chemotherapy to more precise molecular-targeted immunotherapies, which have been associated with improved side effects and outcomes. These modern strategies rely on cancer-specific biomarkers that differentiate malignant from normal cells. The B7 family of immune checkpoint molecules is crucial for cancer immune evasion and a prime therapeutic target. B7-H6, a recently identified member of the B7 family, has emerged as a promising therapeutic target. Unlike other B7 proteins, B7-H6 is not expressed in healthy tissues but is upregulated in several cancers. It binds to NKp30, activating natural killer (NK) cells and triggering immune responses against cancer cells. This review explores the expression of B7-H6 in different cancers, the factors that regulate its expression, and its intrinsic and extrinsic pathways. Additionally, we discuss potential anticancer therapies targeting B7-H6, highlighting its significance in advancing precision medicine. Understanding the role of B7-H6 in cancer immunity may inform the development of appropriate therapies that exploit its cancer-specific expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are among the most aggressive lymphomas and in the majority of cases are considered incurable. Therefore, there is a cogent need for novel therapies. In this review, the authors analyzed the biological rationale, the experimental experience, and the real-world data concerning the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) to treat PTCLs. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are being recognized as a potentially effective treatment approach for peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs), a heterogeneous group of aggressive malignancies with an unfavorable prognosis. Recent evidence has shown that HDACis are effective in treating PTCL, especially in cases where the disease has relapsed or is resistant to conventional treatments. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that HDACis, such as romidepsin and belinostat, can elicit long-lasting positive outcomes in individuals with PTCLs, either when used alone or in conjunction with conventional chemotherapy. They exert their anti-tumor effects by regulating gene expression through the inhibition of histone deacetylases, which leads to cell cycle arrest, induction of programmed cell death, and,the transformation of cancerous T cells, as demonstrated by gene expression profile studies. Importantly, besides clinical trials, real-world evidence indicated that the utilization of HDACis presents a significant and beneficial treatment choice for PTCLs. However, although HDACis showed potential effectiveness, they could not cure most patients. Therefore, new combinations with conventional drugs as well as new targeted agents are under investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Survival for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) is poor, especially in the advanced stage, where curative treatments are not available. While chemotherapy and immunotherapy are used in standard practice, antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a novel therapy option. ADCs potentially enhance cancer cell death and reduce side effects. The anti-HER2 ADC Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-Dxd) has shown survival benefit for patients whose tumours are HER2-positive, including a subgroup of BTCs. In April 2024, the regulatory authority FDA approved T-Dxd for adults with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive solid tumours, including BTCs, lacking other treatment options. Ongoing trials are exploring other potentially actionable BTC molecular alterations. This review will discuss the current evidence and ongoing research in this subject area. Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are aggressive in nature, often presenting asymptomatically until they are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Surgical resection or liver transplantation are potential curative options. However, a large proportion of patients present with incurable locally advanced or metastatic disease and most of these patients are only eligible for palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care. More recently, targeted therapies have proven beneficial in a molecularly selected subgroup of patients with cholangiocarcinoma who have progressed on previous lines of systemic treatment. However, only a minority of patients with BTCs whose tumours harbour specific molecular alterations can access these therapies. Methods: In relation to ADCs, studies regarding use of antibody–drug conjugates in cancer, particularly in BTCs, were searched in Embase (1974 to 2024) and Ovid MEDLINE(R) (1946 to 2024) to obtain relevant articles. Examples of current clinical trials utilising ADC treatment in BTCs were extracted from the ClinicalTrials.gov trial registry. Conclusions: Overall, this review has highlighted that ADCs have shown encouraging outcomes in cancer therapy, and this should lead to further research including in BTCs, where treatment options are often limited. The promising results observed with ADCs in various cancers underscore their potential as a transformative approach in oncology, warranting continued exploration and development and the need for education on the management of their specific toxicities. By addressing current challenges and optimising ADC design and application, future studies could potentially improve treatment outcomes for patients with BTCs and beyond, potentially in both early and advanced stage settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Inclusion of Black patients and other racial minorities has been limited (<2%) in urothelial carcinoma clinical trials. On meta-analysis of all recent ICIs, ADCs and targeted therapy phase III trials in UC (n = 17), women had inferior OS to men (RR 0.89; p = 0.04) on investigational agents. No OS differences by race or age were observed on meta-analysis. Background: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide. However, minority populations, such as female, elder, and Black patients, may have disparate outcomes and are commonly neglected in randomized prospective trials. This review aims to study the relationship between age, sex, and race on urothelial cancer prognosis, particularly focusing on contemporary therapy and its effect on overall survival. Methods: Phase III prospective trials since 2016 of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, or targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma were identified from PubMed. Trials that did not report on survival by race, sex, or age distribution were excluded, and remaining trials (n = 17) were compared by subgroup. Results: Women were reported to have inferior OS on investigational agents compared to men in 9/17 trials. In a meta-analysis, women had inferior OS to men (OR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.78–0.99]; p = 0.04). Asian/Pacific Islander patients had inferior outcomes to White patients on investigational agents in 3/5 trials. In a meta-analysis, OS was not significant by race (OR 1.18 [0.90–1.46], p = 0.38). Black patients composed <2% of all trial patients, and no subgroup data were reported. Both 65 (n = 7) and 75 (n = 2) were reported as age cut-offs in trial subgroups, and survival data were mixed. Conclusions: Women in UC trials may have inferior survival outcomes to men. Racial diversity was poor and thus limited any conclusions on survival disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Gastric cancer (GC) represents a major global health challenge, ranking as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The high mortality rate is primarily due to late-stage diagnoses, which limit effective treatment options. Recent research emphasizes the development of targeted therapies and radiation immunotherapy as promising alternatives to traditional approaches. The review authors summarize recent advancements in targeted therapies for gastric cancer, focusing on both laboratory and clinical studies. They explore targeted approaches that have shown potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment effectiveness. The findings of this paper may significantly impact the research community by highlighting the importance of personalized medicine in gastric cancer treatment. By identifying specific molecular targets and utilizing nanotechnology for drug delivery, these advancements aim to enhance treatment efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity. Overall, the review suggests the potential for improved prognosis and treatment strategies through targeted therapies and precision medicine. Gastric cancer (GC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide and a serious public health concern. This high death rate is mostly caused by late-stage diagnoses, which lead to poor treatment outcomes. Radiation immunotherapy and targeted therapies are becoming increasingly popular in GC treatment, in addition to surgery and systemic chemotherapy. In this review, we have focused on both in vitro and in vivo research, which presents a summary of recent developments in targeted therapies for gastric cancer. We explore targeted therapy approaches, including integrin receptors, HER2, Claudin 18, and glutathione-responsive systems. For instance, therapies targeting the integrin receptors such as the αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins have shown promise in enhancing diagnostic precision and treatment efficacy. Furthermore, nanotechnology provides novel approaches to targeted drug delivery and imaging. These include glutathione-responsive nanoplatforms and cyclic RGD peptide-conjugated nanoparticles. These novel strategies seek to reduce systemic toxicity while increasing specificity and efficacy. To sum up, the review addresses the significance of personalized medicine and advancements in gastric cancer-targeted therapies. It explores potential methods for enhancing gastric cancer prognosis and treatment in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 15% of incident cancer cases. Prognosis is poor, with a metastasis and recurrence rate of 38% within 2 years of surgery and an overall 5-year survival rate of 54–60%. Here, we report successful apatinib monotherapy of early NSCLC in a patient who had declined surgery, radiofrequency ablation, and immunotherapy. The patient received apatinib for 64 months without clinical, laboratory, or radiographic evidence of disease progression. The curative effect was judged to be stable and safe.The role of apatinib as monotherapy for patients with early stage NSCLC who are not candidates for surgery or radiotherapy, or as an adjunct to standard therapy, deserves further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bio-orthogonal labeling of vesicles conjugated with fluorescent molecular groups, enables in vivo bioimaging to monitor their behavior, thus aiding in diagnostics or revealing the internalization mechanisms of extracellular vesicles (EVs). Orthogonally based magnetic beads, microfluidics, and microarray chips specifically and in a high-throughput manner isolate EVs derived from various cancers for diagnosis of diseases and cancer development. By loading drugs onto the surface of EVs or forming covalent bonds between EVs and cells through bio-orthogonal methods, the therapeutic efficiency of EVs can be enhanced. Bio-orthogonal glycometabolism enables EVs to directly target tumor cells and their derived EVs in vivo , thereby inhibiting tumor metastasis and growth. Extracellular vesicle (EV)-based therapeutics have gained substantial interest in the areas of drug delivery, immunotherapy, and regenerative medicine. However, the clinical translation of EVs has been slowed due to limited yields and functional heterogeneity, as well as inadequate targeting. Engineering EVs to modify their inherent function and endow them with additional functions has the potential to advance the clinical translation of EV applications. Bio-orthogonal click chemistry is an engineering approach that modifies EVs in a controlled, specific, and targeted way without compromising their intrinsic structure. Here, we provide an overview of bio-orthogonal labeling approaches involved in EV engineering. We also present the isolation methods of bio-orthogonally labeled vesicles using magnetic beads, microfluidics, and microarray chip technologies. We highlight the in vivo applications of bio-orthogonal labeling EVs for diagnosis and therapy, especially the exciting potential of bio-orthogonal glycometabolic engineered EVs for targeted therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) proves highly effective in addressing melanoma, and its synergy with targeted therapy offers a promising avenue in tumor treatment. However, the therapeutic outcome is largely impeded by the challenge of current photosensitizers and targeted drugs in reaching deep tumor tissues. Herein, a dually‐layered "microneedle rocket" termed PcNP/TRA‐HA‐Tyr/CLG‐MN is designed. The upper layer of the microneedle (MN) is composed of photodynamically active mesoporous silica nanoparticles, featuring photosensitizers covalently bonded to them. Within the mesopores of these nanoparticles lies trametinib (TRA), a compound that specifically targets the hyperactive MEK pathway present in melanoma cells. The lower layer is composed of an enzyme‐mediated hyaluronic acid‐tyramine hydrogel (HA‐Tyr/CLG) with collagenase (CLG), serving as rocket thrusters for remodeling the extracellular matrix (ECM) in tumor microenvironment. Among the three types of MNs prepared, the PcNP/TRA‐HA‐Tyr(II)/CLG‐MN exhibits the deepest penetration in tumor tissues and the longest retention time in vivo. Notably, the administrations of PcNP/TRA‐HA‐Tyr(II)/CLG‐MN alongside light irradiation significantly suppress the growth of A375‐xenografted tumors in mice. Together, the strategy of combining mesoporous silica nanoparticles, enzymatically cross‐linked hydrogels and CLG‐mediated ECM remodeling enables deep drug penetration and efficacious combination treatment against melanoma, showcasing significant potential in the realm of cancer nanomedicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preclinical models of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) suggest a synergistic role for combined MEK and autophagy signaling inhibition, as well as MEK and CDK4/6 pathway targeting. Several case reports implicate clinical activity of the combination of either trametinib and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with KRAS-mutant PDAC or trametinib with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with KRAS and CDKN2A/B alterations. However, prospective data from clinical trials is lacking. Here, we aim to provide clinical evidence regarding the use of these experimental regimens in the setting of dedicated precision oncology programs. Methods: In this retrospective case series, PDAC patients who received either trametinib/HCQ (THCQ) or trametinib/palbociclib (TP) were retrospectively identified across 11 participating cancer centers in Germany. Results: Overall, 34 patients were identified. 19 patients received THCQ, and 15 received TP, respectively. In patients treated with THCQ, the median duration of treatment was 46 days, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 52 days and median overall survival (OS) was 68 days. In the THCQ subgroup, all patients evaluable for response (13/19) had progressive disease (PD) within 100 days. In the TP subgroup, the median duration of treatment was 60 days, median PFS was 56 days and median OS was 195 days. In the TP subgroup, 9/15 patients were evaluable for response, of which 1/9 showed a partial response (PR) while 8/9 had PD. One patient achieved a clinical benefit despite progression under TP. Conclusion: THCQ and TP are not effective in patients with advanced PDAC harboring KRAS mutations or alterations in MAPK/CDKN2A/B. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past decades, liquid biopsy, especially circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has received tremendous attention as a noninvasive detection approach for clinical applications, including early diagnosis of cancer and relapse, real-time therapeutic efficacy monitoring, potential target selection and investigation of drug resistance mechanisms. In recent years, the application of next-generation sequencing technology combined with AI technology has significantly improved the accuracy and sensitivity of liquid biopsy, enhancing its potential in solid tumors. However, the increasing integration of such promising tests to improve therapy decision making by oncologists still has complexities and challenges. Here, we propose a conceptual framework of ctDNA technologies and clinical utilities based on bibliometrics and highlight current challenges and future directions, especially in clinical applications such as early detection, minimal residual disease detection, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. We also discuss the necessities of developing a dynamic field of translational cancer research and rigorous clinical studies that may support therapeutic strategy decision making in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the potential utility of antibody‐drug conjugates targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen‐2 (TROP‐2) in patients with primary penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC), patients with recurrence (REC cohort), and patient‐matched distant metastases (MET cohort), and to assess the potential use of TROP‐2 as a predictive non‐invasive biomarker in PSCC. Methods: A cohort comprising a PRIM (n = 37), REC (n = 5) and MET subcohort (n = 7), with MET including lymph node and lung metastases, was analysed using quantitative real‐time PCR, ELISA and immunohistochemical staining with evaluation of H‐score. Results: TROP‐2 mRNA and serum protein levels were significantly increased in primary and recurrent PSCC compared to cancer‐free controls (both P < 0.001). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that most of the PRIM cohort (n = 34/37, median H‐score 260, interquartile range [IQR] 210–300), as well as all patients in the REC (median [IQR] H‐score 200 [165–290]) and MET cohorts (median [IQR] H‐score 280 [260–300]) exhibited moderate to strong membranous TROP‐2 expression. Additionally, The H‐score (membranous TROP‐2 expression) was positively correlated with TROP‐2 mRNA (ρ = 0.69, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.70) and protein levels (ρ = 0.86, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.59), indicating its potential as a non‐invasive biomarker in PSCC. Conclusion: In summary, our results support further studies on TROP‐2 as a diagnostic and therapeutic target in primary, recurrent and metastatic PSCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the clinical significance of subtyping (type 1 vs 2) of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) in patients treated with targeted therapy, as well as the concordance, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of local review pathology review. Methods: Patients with advanced refractory PRCC were randomised to receive sunitinib or cabozantinib, crizotinib or savolitinib, stratified by PRCC subtype (type 1, type 2, or not otherwise specified [NOS]/mixed) by local review. Central review was retrospectively conducted by three expert genitourinary pathologists who independently reviewed cases. The sensitivity and PPV of local review were estimated and outcomes [objective response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS)] were summarised for treatment groups stratified by subtypes by central review. Results: Amongst the 147 patients reviewed, the prevalence of individual subtypes varied by local or central review (type 1: 17.7% vs 29.3%; type 2: 53.1% vs 45.6%; NOS/mixed: 29.3% vs 25.2%), respectively. Individual cases were frequently reclassified and local pathology review demonstrated low sensitivity (type 1: 48%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 33, 65; type 2: 67%, 95% CI 55, 78; NOS/mixed: 43%, 95% CI 27, 61). The PPVs of local review were 80%, 57.7% and 37% for type 1, 2 and NOS/mixed, respectively. Compared to sunitinib, cabozantinib demonstrated improved PFS for both type 1 and type 2 PRCC subgroups (7.4 vs 9.0 and 2.9 vs 5.6 months, respectfully) as well as higher ORR. Conclusions: The PRCC subtype assignment did not identify a subset of patients with greater clinical benefit from cabozantinib, with significant discordance between local and central review. Our findings confirm the limited clinical value of pathological subtyping of metastatic PRCC, in line with the recent World Health Organisation 2022 guidelines. Patient summary: In this study, categorising papillary renal cell carcinoma into type 1 or 2 subtypes showed limited concordance between central and local pathological review and did not enrich for patients more likely to benefit from cabozantinib in the S1500 PAPMET trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To analyze the impact of different patterns of healthcare delivery on remission of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with targeted therapies during the first wave (2020) and second/third waves (2021) of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (2019). Methods: In this observational real-life study, data from RA patients treated with biologic or targeted synthetic drugs were extracted from a longitudinal registry. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was analyzed in the same period from the 22nd of February to the 18th of May for three consecutive years. These three periods were characterized by different patterns of healthcare delivery: (1) before the pandemic (2019) only in-person visits, (2) during the first wave (2020) both in-person visits and telehealth, and (3) during the second/third waves (2021) only in-person visits. A generalized linear model with the binomial error was fitted to evaluate the difference in the proportion of patients in CDAI remission. Quantile regression was used to compare the median of CDAI in difficult-to-treat (D2T) patients. Results: In the three periods, we included 407, 450, and 540 RA patients respectively. The percentages of patients in CDAI remission were similar in the three periods (prevalence ratio 1.07, p value 0.423 between 2020 and 2019, and 1.01, p-value 0.934 between 2021 and 2019). The CDAI remission rate was 40.55% (N = 163), 43.18% (N = 155) and 40.82% (N = 220) in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Among our cohort of D2T patients, CDAI remission was similar across the three periods (N = 30, 22.22%; N = 27, 23.68%; and N = 34, 21.52% respectively). Conclusion: Although the pandemic has imposed changes in our healthcare delivery, these different strategies seem to be effective in ensuring satisfactory management of RA treated with targeted therapies. The approaches modulated in the context of the different periods have been a feasible compensation for ensuring disease control even in D2T patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The impact of cancer-related diarrhea (CRD) on changes in cancer therapy remains poorly characterized despite its prevalence. Methods: We performed a longitudinal observational study using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus claims data. Patients included adults with CRD identified by diagnosis codes or pharmacy claims and compared their outcomes to matched (1:1) patients without CRD. Treatment parameters (discontinuation, persistence, augmentation, dose titration, adherence) were evaluated and stratified for the first cancer therapy (chemotherapy vs. targeted therapy vs. both). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the difference in risk of each treatment parameter between cohorts, adjusting for cancer type, therapy, and comorbidities. Results: We identified 104,135 matched pairs of patients with solid (n = 94,411) or hematologic cancers (n = 9,724) receiving chemotherapy (n = 47,220), targeted therapy (n = 2,427), or both (n = 5,313). Patients with CRD discontinued therapy more frequently than those without CRD (chemotherapy [81.5% vs. 62.3%], targeted therapy [69.2% vs. 64.3%], both [96.0% vs. 85.5%], p < 0.0001). The overall proportion of discontinuation was higher (82.4% vs. 64.6%, p < 0.0001), including a higher risk of discontinuation (HR = 1.40, p < 0.001) for patients with CRD. The mean time to discontinuation (59.6 ± 54.1 vs. 68.3 ± 76.6 days), switch (72.0 ± 48.6 vs. 96.9 ± 84.0 days), persistence (95.1 ± 98.1 vs. 154.3 ± 142.7 days), and adherence (25.5% ± 37.2 vs. 47.9 ± 41%) were all lower (p < 0.0001) among patients with CRD. Conclusion: Patients who develop CRD undergo significant and clinically impactful index treatment discontinuation, treatment switching, and have lower adherence and persistence of anticancer therapy compared to patients without CRD. Strategies to control CRD to optimize cancer therapy are urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditionally, for patients who are poor candidates for surgery and/or radiotherapy, palliative chemotherapy is often offered but with significant toxic side effects. However, recent advancements in our understanding of tumor biology and molecular genetics have brought new understanding to the molecular pathways of certain tumors and cancers. This has ushered in a new era of precision medicine specific to a tumor or cancer treatment pathway (targeted therapy) or directed to host-tumor responses (immunotherapy). This article will focus on recent updates in the application of available targeted and immunotherapy for managing orbital and periorbital tumors and tumor-like conditions, which include cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, cutaneous melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, sebaceous gland carcinoma, solitary fibrous tumor, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, orbital meningioma, neurofibromatosis, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, ocular adnexal lymphoma, orbital lymphatic malformation, and adenoid cystic carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The past year has offered significant advancements in the field of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), both in the early and advanced disease settings. The identification of guideline‐recommended actionable targets has provided the foundation for developing multiple new therapeutic agents. There has been a focus on developing drugs designed to overcome acquired resistance, a limitation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor–based therapy in lung cancer. In addition, there is an emerging trend toward combination therapies for patients in the first‐line setting with the goal of preventing or delaying resistance. Another promising area of development has been the use of antibody–drug conjugates, where there are the initial reports of central nervous system efficacy and activity in patients with genomic alterations. Over the past year, numerous publications and presentations have highlighted multiple therapeutic advances, offering new treatment options for patients with NSCLC. The focus of this review is to summarize the most impactful findings, emphasizing their significance in the evolving treatment landscape for NSCLC. Several landmark trials in lung cancer with practice‐changing clinical implications have been presented and published in 2023. This article reviews a selection of these trials as they relate to early and advanced‐stage oncogene‐driven lung cancer. The ADAURA and ALINA trials, in which targeted therapy given in the adjuvant setting has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes, are reviewed. In the advanced‐stage setting, recent trials in the context of specific oncogene drivers are reviewed, including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET, ERBB2 (HER2), BRAF, MET exon 14 skipping (METex14), and KRAS alterations. Also discussed are the results of several trials that have evaluated the use of combination therapies and resistance‐mechanism agnostic treatment strategies. Plain Language Summary: Targeted therapy plays an important role for patients with early and advanced‐stage non–small cell lung cancer carrying specific genetic alterations.New strategies that combine multiple therapies are now being studied in randomized clinical trials, with the goal of enhancing the effectiveness of targeted therapy for patients with advanced lung cancer. Several clinical trials published this past year have contributed to significant advances in thoracic oncology. Here, the focus is on targeted therapy advances reported in 2023 that are impacting clinical decision‐making in everyday practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drugs or cellular products that bind to gp100 are being investigated for treatment of cutaneous melanoma. The relative specificity of gp100 expression in melanocytes makes it an attractive target to harness for therapeutic intent. For example, Tebentafusp, a bispecific gp100 peptide-HLA-directed CD3 T cell engager, has generated significant enthusiasm in recent years due to its success in improving outcomes for uveal melanoma and is being studied in cutaneous melanoma. However, the extent and intensity of gp100 expression in advanced cutaneous melanoma has not been well studied. Here, we interrogated a large cohort of primary and metastatic melanomas for gp100 expression by immunohistochemistry. Expression in metastatic samples was globally higher and almost uniformly positive, however the degree of intensity was variable. Using a quantitative immunofluorescence method, we confirmed the variability in expression. As gp100-binding drugs are assessed in clinical trials, the association between activity of the drugs and the level of gp100 expression should be studied in order to potentially improve patient selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer remains a prominent cause to life expectancy, and targeted cancer therapy stands as a pivotal approach in contemporary therapy. Calcium (Ca2+) signalling plays a multifaceted role in cancer progression, such as proliferation, invasion and distant metastasis. Otherwise, it also exerts an important influence on the efficacy of clinical treatment, including cancer therapy resistance. In this review we discuss the role of the L‐type calcium channel CaV1.3 (calcium voltage‐gated channel subunit alpha1 D) in different types of cancers, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target for certain cancer types. The development of selective blockers of the CaV1.3 channel has been of great interest and is expected to be a new option for the treatment of cancers such as prostate cancer and endometrial cancer. We present the pharmacological properties of CaV1.3 and the current status of selective blocker development, and analyse the challenges and possible directions for breakthroughs in the development of tailored medicines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Urologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Approximately 45% of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) patients harbor a BRAFV600E mutation and are eligible for target therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), nevertheless, few data advocate for this. Hence, we've conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness and safety of BRAFi/MEKi in BRAFV600E ATC patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for BRAFi/MEKi TT in BRAFV600E ATC patients. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and adverse events (AEs). Results: Nine studies with 168 patients were included. Median follow-up ranged from 2.0 to 47.9 months. 75% of patients had stage IVc. In a pooled analysis, ORR was 68.15% (95% CI 55.31–80.99, I2 = 47%) and DCR was 85.39% (95% CI 78.10–92.68, I2 = 0), with a median DOR of 14.4 months (95% CI 4.6–14.4) and a median PFS of 6.7 months (95% CI 4.7–34.2). Moreover, 1-year OS rate was 64.97% (95% CI 48.76–81.17, I2 = 84%) and 2-years OS rate was 52.08% (95% CI 35.71–68.45, I2 = 79%). Subgroup analysis showed patients in the neoadjuvant setting had higher rates of 1 and 2-years OS and observational studies tended to report higher rates of ORR than clinical trials. No new or unexpected adverse events were found. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated BRAFi/MEKi have a decent activity for BRAFV600E ATC patients, especially in the neoadjuvant setting, with a tolerable safety profile. However, further clinical trials are warranted to investigate these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, long-term prognosis and safety of combining chemotherapy with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Methods: In this single arm phase II trial, twenty-nine patients with advanced BTC were included, all of whom received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy combined with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as the first-line treatment. And the study analyzed anti-tumor efficacy, long-term prognosis, and adverse reactions. Results: Among the patients, 0 patient achieved complete response, 18 patients (62.1%) achieved partial response, 8 patients (27.6%) had stable disease, and 3 patients (10.3%) experienced progressive disease. The corresponding objective response rate (ORR) was 18/29 (62.1%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 26/29 (89.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0 -21.8) and the median progress free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.8-12.6). The 1-year OS and PFS were 65% (95% CI: 0.479-0.864) and 41% (95% CI: 0.234-0.656), respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was 27/29 (93.1%), and the incidence of grade III/IV adverse reactions was 5/29 (17.2%). Conclusion: The combination of chemotherapy, regorafenib, and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC may has good anti-tumor efficacy without causing serious adverse reactions, and can significantly improve the long-term prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma has evolved significantly. This study aimed to identify the most beneficial regimen. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from July 2012 to August 2024 across the following four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. This search focused on phase III prospective randomized controlled trials that compared first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Results: Seventeen studies involving 10322 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Of the studies we included, twelve studies were global multicenter clinical studies, four were initiated in China, and one was initiated in Korea. The results of our statistical analysis suggest that Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil (HAIC-FO) demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefits compared with most treatments, including various immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKIs). In terms of OS, HAIC had shown similar efficacy with sorafenib plus FOLFOX (HR, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.37-2.09) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib (HR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.30-1.56). Notably, immune-related treatments, such as ICIs combined with anti-VEGF therapies, also showed improved OS compared with anti-VEGF-TKIs alone. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), HAIC-FO outperformed anti-VEGF-TKI monotherapy, ICI monotherapy, and several ICI combinations. However, it was not superior to lenvatinib plus TACE or lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab. Based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values, HAIC-FO was ranked the most effective in terms of OS (SUCRA = 0.961) and objective response rate (ORR) (SUCRA = 0.971). The results of the subgroup analysis suggested that HAIC-FO achieved the best OS benefit in the macrovascular invasion (MVI) and extrahepatic spread (EHS) subgroup (SUCRA = 0.99) and that tremelimumab combined with durvalumab achieved the best OS benefit in the Asian subgroup (SUCRA = 0.88). Conclusion: This systematic review and network meta-analysis suggest that HAIC-based therapies may become a potential first-line treatment option for advanced HCC, especially for patients in Mainland China with MVI and EHS. Additionally, immune-related treatments may be more suitable for Asian populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]