Search

Your search keyword '"TAŞDÖĞEN, AYDIN"' showing total 42 results
Start Over Author "TAŞDÖĞEN, AYDIN"
42 results on '"TAŞDÖĞEN, AYDIN"'

11. Configuration of the Anesthesia Clinic in COVID-19 Pandemic: Dokuz Eylul Faculty of Medicine Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department

Author

HANCI, VOLKAN, ÖZKARDEŞLER ÖZGÜL, SEVDA, YURTLU, BÜLENT SERHAN, HEPAĞUŞLAR, HASAN, AKSU ERDOST, HALE, OLGUNER, ÇİMEN GÜLBEN, GÜNENÇ, SAKİZE FERİM, ERKİN, YÜKSEL, TAŞDÖĞEN, AYDIN, ÖÇMEN, ELVAN, ÖZBİLGİN, ŞULE, KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ, SEMİH, KARCI, AYŞE, KUVAKİ BALKAN, BAHAR, GÖKMEN, ALİ NECATİ, İYİLİKÇİ KARAOĞLAN, LEYLA, KOCA, UĞUR, GÖKEL, EROL, and MALTEPE, FİKRET

Published
2022

12. Configuration of the Anesthesia Clinic in the COVID-19Pandemic: Dokuz Eylül Faculty of Medicine Anesthesiologyand Reanimation Department

Author

AKSU ERDOST, HALE, İYİLİKÇİ KARAOĞLAN, LEYLA, HANCI, VOLKAN, YURTLU, BÜLENT SERHAN, MALTEPE, FİKRET, ÖZKARDEŞLER ÖZGÜL, SEVDA, ÖZBİLGİN, ŞULE, KOCA, UĞUR, GÖKMEN, ALİ NECATİ, GÜNENÇ, SAKİZE FERİM, ERKİN, YÜKSEL, TAŞDÖĞEN, AYDIN, OLGUNER, ÇİMEN GÜLBEN, KARCI, AYŞE, ÖÇMEN, ELVAN, GÖKEL, EROL, KUVAKİ BALKAN, BAHAR, KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ, SEMİH, and HEPAĞUŞLAR, HASAN

Published
2022

40. Ischemic preconditioning attenuates lipid peroxidation and apoptosis in the cecal ligation and puncture model of sepsis

Author

OLGUNER, ÇIMEN GÜLBEN, primary, KOCA, UĞUR, additional, ALTEKIN, EMEL, additional, ERGÜR, BEKIR UĞUR, additional, DURU, SEDEN, additional, GIRGIN, PELIN, additional, TAŞDÖĞEN, AYDIN, additional, GÜNDÜZ, KERIM, additional, GÜZELDAĞ, SEDA, additional, AKKUŞ, MUHAMMED, additional, and MICILI, SERAP CILAKER, additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

42. Propofol and sevoflurane during epidural/general anesthesia: comparison of early recovery characteristics and pain relief.

Author

Hepağuşlar H, Ozzeybek D, Ozkardeşler S, Taşdöğen A, Duru S, and Elar Z

Subjects
Abdomen surgery, Adult, Aged, Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, Analgesics, Opioid administration & dosage, Analgesics, Opioid therapeutic use, Female, Fentanyl administration & dosage, Fentanyl therapeutic use, Hemodynamics drug effects, Hemodynamics physiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Pain epidemiology, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative epidemiology, Pain, Postoperative prevention & control, Respiratory Mechanics drug effects, Respiratory Mechanics physiology, Sevoflurane, Sex Characteristics, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Anesthesia, Epidural, Anesthesia, General, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Anesthetics, Intravenous, Methyl Ethers, Pain prevention & control, Propofol
Abstract

We investigated the early recovery characteristics and pain relief of adult patients during combined anesthesia with (epidural and general), either with propofol or sevoflurane for maintenance in major abdominal surgery. Twenty-two patients (ASA I-III) were enrolled in this randomized, prospective study. After fluid preloading, 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 5 ml of prilocaine 0.5% + 1 ml of fentanyl 50 microg mL(-1) were administered via an epidural catheter. General anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol after T6 sensorial blockade. Propofol group (n = 11) received propofol (2-5 mg kg(-1) h(-1)), sevoflurane group (n = 11) received sevoflurane (1-2%) for maintenance. Anesthesia was supplemented with N2O in O2 and intravenous fentanyl. Continuous epidural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine + 1 microg fentanyl (5-7 mL h(-1)) was started forty-five min after the epidural bolus dose and 5 ml of it was given at the start of the wound closure. All anesthetics were discontinued except epidural infusion during the last suture. After emergence time was determined, the patients were transferred to the PACU. They were observed for orientation times of person and place. The pain scores (verbal analogue scale, 0-10) were assessed with 30 min intervals. When the patient's pain score was >3, rescue analgesic protocol (diclofenac Na 75 mg im followed by meperidine HCI approximately 0.25 mg kg(-1) iv at the latter period) was applied. In the case of inadequate pain relief during the latter assessment periods, meperidine HCI approximately 0.25 mg kg(-1) was administered. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were used for the statistical analysis. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. Between the groups no statistical differences were observed in the emergence time (5 vs. 6 min, median) and in the orientation time to person (6 vs. 10 min). Recovery of orientation to place was found faster in propofol group (7 vs. 12 min, p = 0.041). Pain scores of the patients between the groups were not statistically different at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 min postoperatively (3, 2, 3, 2, 2, and 2, 4, 4, 3, 3, respectively). Rescue analgesic protocol and additional meperidine HCI were applied to 63.6% and 45.4% of patients in the propofol group, 54.5% and 36.3% of patients in the sevoflurane group, respectively. There weren't any statistical differences in regard to these, either. Except orientation time to place, the times of emergence and orientation to person, the pain scores and the analgesic requirements of the patients in both groups were similar. Propofol or sevoflurane did not offer any advantages for postoperative pain relief on behalf of either one when combined with epidural anesthesia.

Published
2004

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results