Search

Given the significant limitations of available literature, central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in large B-cell lymphomas remains debatable. Wilson and colleagues provide cautious recommendations, on a case-by-case basis, useful to guide discussion with individual patient. In daily practice, CNS relapse risk, prophylaxis safety and prognosis of CNS recurrence must be considered. Commentary on: Wilson et al. Central nervous system prophylaxis in large B-cell lymphoma: A British Society for Haematology Good Practice Paper. Br J Haematol 2024 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.19686., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Early diagnosis is crucial for the successful treatment of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), a rapidly progressing tumour. Suspicion raised on brain MRI must be confirmed by a histopathological diagnosis of a tumour specimen collected by stereotactic biopsy. In rare cases, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or vitreous humour might aid in providing a cytological diagnosis. Several disease-related, patient-related, and treatment-related factors affect the timing and accuracy of diagnosis and patient outcome. Some molecules detected in CSF, aqueous and vitreous humour, and peripheral blood were proposed as diagnostic biomarkers for PCNSL; however, detection methods for most of these molecules are not yet standardised, have a long turnaround time, are expensive, and have little reproducibility among labs. By contrast, the MYD88 Leu265Pro somatic hotspot mutation, revealed by PCR-based assay, is currently and reliably used during the diagnosis of some lymphomas, and IL-10, measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, is routinely used to diagnose and monitor different common metabolic and immunological diseases. Several independent studies have shown that MYD88 Leu265Pro and IL-10 can be easily assessed in peripheral blood, plasma, aqueous and vitreous humour, and CSF of patients with PCNSL with substantial sensitivity and specificity, especially when evaluated in combination. In this Viewpoint, evidence supporting the routine use of MYD88 Leu265Pro and IL-10 in diagnosing PCNSL is considered, and some examples of the frequent difficulties found in the diagnosis of PCNSL are provided, highlighting the role and indications of these two biomarkers to improve the timely recognition of this aggressive tumour., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TC received an independent grant (Award for Younger Researchers 2018) from Roche. AJMF was the chairman of the PAMINA trial, which supports the use of MYD88(Leu265Pro) and IL-10 as diagnostic markers in patients with primary CNS lymphoma. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

This EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing primary DLBCL of the CNS.The guideline covers clinical, imaging and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up.Algorithms for first-line and salvage treatments are provided.The author group encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe.Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors' collective expert opinion., Competing Interests: AJMF reports personal financial interests for advisory board membership for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Genmab, Gilead, Incyte, Juno, Novartis, PletixaPharm and Roche; institutional financial interests as local Principal Investigator (PI) for ADC Therapeutics, Amgen, BeiGene, BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Hutchison Medipharma, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics and Takeda; institution research grants from BTG Therapeutics; institutional funding from Roche; non‐financial interests as a member of the Global Outreach Committee of the EHA and as a member of the Board of Directors (President) of Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. GI reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for Gilead, Incyte, Roche and as an invited speaker for Riemser; non‐financial interests as a member of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Onkologie (DGHO) and a leadership role for the German Lymphoma Alliance (Mitglied des Vorstandes). JKD reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for Eli Lilly. DPA reports non‐financial interests as a member of an academic subcommittee for the British Society of Neuroradiologists. JECB reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for Gilead and lecture honorarium from Novartis; institutional financial interests for funding of educational symposia from Roche and TEVA. TC reports personal financial interests for advisory board membership and consultancy for Janssen‐Cilag S.p.A; speaking honoraria from Takeda; participation in the Hema for the Future project for Sandoz. KC reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Atara, Celgene, Incyte, Janssen, Kite, Roche and Takeda; personal financial interests as an invited speaker for Incyte, Kite, Roche and Takeda; non‐financial interests as a member of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the EHA, and leadership roles with the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI; chair of UK NCRI T‐cell lymphoma study group). CPF reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, MorphoSys, Ono, Roche, SERB and Sobi; personal financial interests as an invited speaker for AbbVie, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Roche and Takeda; institutional financial interests as coordinating PI for BeiGene and Roche; institutional financial interests as a steering committee member for Genmab and MorphoSys; non‐financial interests for an advisory role for Blood Cancer UK (clinical trials funding committee member) and Lymphoma Action (medical advisory panel member); non‐financial interests for leadership roles with Cure Leukaemia (clinical trials steering committee member) and the NCRI (chair of UK NCRI aggressive lymphoma study group). KHX reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for BTG. MP reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for BeiGene and Novartis; personal financial interests for expert testimony for Ventana Roche. ES reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for Riemser Pharma; personal financial interests for a writing engagement for Riemser Pharma; personal financial interests as an advisory board member for SERB Pharmaceuticals; institutional financial interests as a coordinating PI for Riemser Pharma and as a local PI for AbbVie, Riemser Pharma and Roche; non‐financial interests as a PI for AbbVie and Roche; non‐financial interests as a member of the DGHO and German Lymphoma Alliance. CS reports institutional funding from AstraZeneca. LS reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for Kyowa Kirin and Takeda; personal financial interests as author royalties from Munksgaard Publishing and Springer Verlag; institutional financial interests as a steering committee member for Varian and ViewRay; non‐financial interests for leadership roles with the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (Vice Chair) and the Danish Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (Chair); non‐financial interests as a PI for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); non‐financial interests as a member of ASCO, American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO). EZ reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for AbbVie, BeiGene, BMS, Curis, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Miltenyi Biomedicine and Roche; institutional financial interests for travel grants from BeiGene, Gilead, Janssen and Roche; institutional financial interests for trial sponsorship from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celgene/BMS, Incyte, Janssen and Roche. CB reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for AbbVie, Pfizer and Sobi; personal financial interests as an advisory board member for BeiGene, Celltrion, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Novartis, Regeneron and Roche; institutional funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Celltrion, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer and Roche. MJ reports personal financial interests as an advisory board member for BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Janssen and Novartis; personal financial interests as an invited speaker for Incyte; institutional financial interests as an invited speaker for Roche; institutional funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen and Roche; institutional financial interests as coordinating PI for BioInvent. MD reports personal financial interests as an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Novartis and Roche; personal financial interests as an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS/Celgene, Genmab, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly/Loxo, Novartis and Roche; institutional research grants from AbbVie, Bayer, Celgene, Janssen and Roche; institutional funding from Gilead/Kite; non‐financial interests as a member of ASCO, American Society of Hematology (ASH; subcommittee member), DGHO (prior Board member), EHA (Executive Board member), ESMO (Faculty member) and Lymphoma Research Foundation [LRF; Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Consortium member]. DM has declared no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. HemaSphere Published by John Wiley & Sons on behalf of European Hematology Association and by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is the most common indolent lymphoma primarily arising in the central nervous system (CNS). To date, 207 cases of primary CNS MZL (PCNSMZL) were published, mostly as single case reports or small case series. It most commonly presents as extra-axial dural-based masses, more frequently in middle-aged women, displaying an insidious onset, with a long history of symptoms preceding the diagnosis. PCNSMZL can be radiographically mistaken for meningioma. PCNSMZL consists of CD20 + , CD3 - small B lymphocytes with varying degrees of plasmacytic differentiation and low proliferation index. Trisomy 3, but not MALT1 or IgH translocation, is a common genetic abnormality. Other recurrent genetic abnormalities involve TNFAIP3 and NOTCH2. Ethiopathogenesis was poorly investigated. Due to its rarity, standard of care remains to be defined; it exhibits an excellent prognosis after varied treatments, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or their combinations. Nevertheless, each treatment should be considered after an accurate analysis of overtreatment risk. Short follow-up is a major limitation in reported PCNSMZL cases, which restrains our knowledge on long-term results and iatrogenic sequels. This review was focussed on presentation, differential diagnoses, pathological findings, treatment options and clinical outcomes of PCNSMZL; recommendations for best clinical practice are provided., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare, aggressive form of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. To predict the overall survival (OS) in advance is of utmost importance as it has the potential to aid clinical decision-making. Though radiomics-based machine learning (ML) has demonstrated the promising performance in PCNSL, it demands large amounts of manual feature extraction efforts from magnetic resonance images beforehand. deep learning (DL) overcomes this limitation., Methods: In this paper, we tailored the 3D ResNet to predict the OS of patients with PCNSL. To overcome the limitation of data sparsity, we introduced data augmentation and transfer learning, and we evaluated the results using r stratified k-fold cross-validation. To explain the results of our model, gradient-weighted class activation mapping was applied., Results: We obtained the best performance (the standard error) on post-contrast T1-weighted (T1Gd)-area under curve [Formula: see text], accuracy [Formula: see text], precision [Formula: see text], recall [Formula: see text] and F1-score [Formula: see text], while compared with ML-based models on clinical data and radiomics data, respectively, further confirming the stability of our model. Also, we observed that PCNSL is a whole-brain disease and in the cases where the OS is less than 1 year, it is more difficult to distinguish the tumor boundary from the normal part of the brain, which is consistent with the clinical outcome., Conclusions: All these findings indicate that T1Gd can improve prognosis predictions of patients with PCNSL. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time to use DL to explain model patterns in OS classification of patients with PCNSL. Future work would involve collecting more data of patients with PCNSL, or additional retrospective studies on different patient populations with rare diseases, to further promote the clinical role of our model., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: Patients with relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (rrPCNSL) have poor prognosis, with a median survival after relapse of 6.8 months. In this review, we discuss the evolving landscape and the possible future directions related to this important unmet clinical need., Recent Findings: The modern two-phase approach for newly diagnosed PCNSL based on an induction using high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) combinations and a subsequent consolidation, has significantly improved the outcome in this setting. However, this strategy is able to cure more or less 50% of patients. rrPCNSL patients have a very poor prognosis with a reported 5-year overall survival of 18%. Late relapses (after third year) and use of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) represent important factors associated with a better outcome in this setting. On the basis of the growing acquisition of knowledge on the molecular characteristics of PCNSL, the use of non-chemotherapeutic drugs such as bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTK-is), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) is increasing in the last years along with the introduction of novel approaches (CAR-T cells and blood--brain barrier disruption). However, despite high responses in some cases, durations are often short, translating in outcome results still unsatisfactory., Summary: Treatment of rrPCNSL patients is challenging. As no standard of care exist in this setting, it is of paramount importance to acquire new knowledge related to this condition and start multidisciplinary collaboration in order to improve pts outcome., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a diffuse large B cell lymphoma in which the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges and/or eyes are exclusive sites of disease. Pathophysiology is incompletely understood, although a central role seems to comprise immunoglobulins binding to self-proteins expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and alterations of genes involved in B cell receptor, Toll-like receptor and NF-κB signalling. Other factors such as T cells, macrophages or microglia, endothelial cells, chemokines, and interleukins, probably also have important roles. Clinical presentation varies depending on the involved regions of the CNS. Standard of care includes methotrexate-based polychemotherapy followed by age-tailored thiotepa-based conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation and, in patients unsuitable for such treatment, consolidation with whole-brain radiotherapy or single-drug maintenance. Personalized treatment, primary radiotherapy and only supportive care should be considered in unfit, frail patients. Despite available treatments, 15-25% of patients do not respond to chemotherapy and 25-50% relapse after initial response. Relapse rates are higher in older patients, although the prognosis of patients experiencing relapse is poor independent of age. Further research is needed to identify diagnostic biomarkers, treatments with higher efficacy and less neurotoxicity, strategies to improve the penetration of drugs into the CNS, and roles of other therapies such as immunotherapies and adoptive cell therapies., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. Although therapeutic progresses have significantly improved Overall Survival (OS), a number of patients do not respond to HD-MTX-based chemotherapy (15-25%) or experience relapse (25-50%) after an initial response. The reasons underlying this poor response to therapy are unknown. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop improved predictive models for PCNSL. In this study, we investigated whether radiomics features can improve outcome prediction in patients with PCNSL. A total of 80 patients diagnosed with PCNSL were enrolled. A patient sub-group, with complete Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) series, were selected for the stratification analysis. Following radiomics feature extraction and selection, different Machine Learning (ML) models were tested for OS and Progression-free Survival (PFS) prediction. To assess the stability of the selected features, images from 23 patients scanned at three different time points were used to compute the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and to evaluate the reproducibility of each feature for both original and normalized images. Features extracted from Z-score normalized images were significantly more stable than those extracted from non-normalized images with an improvement of about 38% on average ( p -value < 10-12). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) showed that radiomics-based prediction overcame prediction based on current clinical prognostic factors with an improvement of 23% for OS and 50% for PFS, respectively. These results indicate that radiomics features extracted from normalized MR images can improve prognosis stratification of PCNSL patients and pave the way for further study on its potential role to drive treatment choice.

Background: Consolidation therapy has improved the outcome of newly diagnosed PCNSL patients. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was the first consolidation strategy used and represented the gold standard for many years, but at the expense of a high risk of neurotoxicity. Thus, alternative strategies are being investigated in order to improve disease outcomes and to spare the neurocognitive side effects due to WBRT., Methods: We reviewed published studies on PCNSL patients treated with HDC/ASCT, focusing on the efficacy and safety of the conditioning regimens. Prospective and retrospective studies, published in the English language from 1992 to 2022, in high-quality international journals were identified in PubMed., Results: Consolidation with HDC containing highly CNS-penetrating agents (thiotepa, busulfan or BCNU) followed by ASCT provided long-term disease control and survival in PCNSL patients. Two prospective randomized studies, comparing HDC/ASCT versus WBRT, reported similar progression-free survival (PFS) and similar results on the decline in neurocognitive functions in a substantial proportion of patients after WBRT but not after HDC-ASCT. A recent randomized study comparing HDC/ASCT versus non-myeloablative consolidation reported a longer PFS in transplanted patients., Conclusion: ASCT conditioned with regimens, including highly CNS-penetrating agents, represents, to date, the best choice among the available consolidation strategies for fit newly diagnosed PCNSL patients.

To optimise management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection identifying high-risk patients and maintaining treatment dose intensity is an important issue in patients with aggressive lymphomas. In the present study, we report on the presentation, management, and outcome of an international series of 91 patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma and SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 was diagnosed before/during first-line treatment in 64 patients, during follow-up in 21, and during salvage therapy in six. Among the 64 patients infected before/during first-line chemotherapy, 38 (59%) developed pneumonia and 26 (41%) did not clear the virus. Prolonged exposure to steroids before viral infection and/or treatment with high-dose cytarabine favoured pneumonia development and virus persistence and were associated with poorer survival; 81% of patients who did not clear virus died early from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Vaccination was associated with lower pneumonia incidence and in-hospital mortality. Chemotherapy was initiated/resumed in 43 (67%) patients, more commonly among patients who did not develop pneumonia, cleared the virus, or did not receive steroids during infection. Chemotherapy resumption in patients with viral persistence should be indicated cautiously as it was associated with a poorer survival (6-month, 70% and 87%, p = 0.07). None of the 21 patients infected during follow-up died from COVID-19, requiring similar measures as infected subjects in the general population., (© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The blood-brain tumor barrier represents a major obstacle for anticancer drug delivery to brain tumors. Thus, novel strategies aimed at targeting and breaching this structure are of great experimental and clinical interest. This review is primarily focused on the development and use of a derivative of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) that can target and alter the blood-brain-tumor-barrier. This drug, called NGR-TNF, consists of a TNF molecule fused to the Cys-Asn-Gly-Arg-Cys-Gly (CNGRCG) peptide (called NGR), a ligand of aminopeptidase N (CD13)-positive tumor blood vessels. Results of preclinical studies suggest that this peptide-cytokine fusion product represents a valuable strategy for delivering TNF to tumor vessels in an amount sufficient to break the biological barriers that restrict drug penetration in cancer lesions. Moreover, clinical studies performed in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma, have shown that an extremely low dose of NGR-TNF (0.8 µg/m 2 ) is sufficient to promote selective blood-brain-tumor-barrier alteration, increase the efficacy of R-CHOP (a chemo-immunotherapy regimen) and improve patient survival. Besides reviewing these findings, we discuss the potential problems related to the instability and molecular heterogeneity of NGR-TNF and review the various approaches so far developed to obtain more robust and homogeneous TNF derivatives, as well as the pharmacological properties of other peptide/antibody-TNF fusion products, muteins and nanoparticles that are potentially useful for targeting the blood-brain tumor barrier. Compared to other TNF-related drugs, the administration of extremely low-doses of NGR-TNF or its derivatives appear as promising non-immunogenic approaches to overcome TNF counter-regulatory mechanism and systemic toxicity, thereby enabling safe breaking of the BBTB.

Prophylactic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is often used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients at high risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, despite limited evidence demonstrating efficacy or the optimal delivery method. We conducted a retrospective, international analysis of 1384 patients receiving HD-MTX CNS prophylaxis either intercalated (i-HD-MTX) (n = 749) or at the end (n = 635) of R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapy (EOT). There were 78 CNS relapses (3-year rate 5.7%), with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT: 5.7% vs 5.8%, P = .98; 3-year difference: 0.04% (-2.0% to 3.1%). Conclusions were unchanged on adjusting for baseline prognostic factors or on 6-month landmark analysis (n = 1253). In patients with a high CNS international prognostic index (n = 600), the 3-year CNS relapse rate was 9.1%, with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT. On multivariable analysis, increasing age and renal/adrenal involvement were the only independent risk factors for CNS relapse. Concurrent intrathecal prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in CNS relapse. R-CHOP delays of ≥7 days were significantly increased with i-HD-MTX vs EOT, with 308 of 1573 (19.6%) i-HD-MTX treatments resulting in a delay to subsequent R-CHOP (median 8 days). Increased risk of delay occurred in older patients when delivery was later than day 10 in the R-CHOP cycle. In summary, we found no evidence that EOT delivery increases CNS relapse risk vs i-HD-MTX. Findings in high-risk subgroups were unchanged. Rates of CNS relapse in this HD-MTX-treated cohort were similar to comparable cohorts receiving infrequent CNS prophylaxis. If HD-MTX is still considered for certain high-risk patients, delivery could be deferred until R-CHOP completion., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Introduction: The modern treatment of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) consists of two phases: induction, currently represented by a high-dose-methotrexate-based polychemotherapy, and consolidation. The optimal consolidation therapy has not been defined yet, but several strategies, such as whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) or nonmyeloablative chemotherapy, have been addressed in important randomized trials., Areas Covered: This review provides an overview of the current role of consolidation strategies in young and fit patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL. Publications in English language, peer-reviewed, from high-quality international journals, edited from 2003 to 2021 were identified on PubMed., Expert Opinion: Consolidation treatment significantly improved outcomes of PCNSL. Radiotherapy had represented for years the only choice in the consolidation therapy, but large randomized trials have demonstrated that HDC/ASCT is equally effective and associated with lower neurotoxicity risk in patients younger than 65-70 years. Encouraging results have been obtained using reduced-dose WBRT, while a recent randomized trial failed to demonstrate that consolidation with nonmyeloablative chemotherapy is more effective than HDC/ASCT in PCNSL patients. A personalized consolidation treatment, driven also by a response prediction model based on radiological and molecular details, may improve the management of PCNSL patients.

Objective: To investigate the role of quantitative muscle biomarkers assessed with skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar vertebra (L3-SMI) and temporal muscle thickness (TMT) in predicting progression-free and overall survival in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) undergoing first-line high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy., Methods: L3-SMI and TMT were calculated on abdominal CT and brain high-resolution 3D-T1-weighted MR images, respectively, using predefined validated methods. Standardized sex-specific cut-off values were used to divide patients in different risk categories. Kaplan-Meier plots were calculated, and survival analysis was performed using log-rank tests, univariate, and multivariable Cox-regression models, calculating hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), also adjusting for potential confounders (age, sex, and performance status)., Results: Forty-three patients were included in this study. Median follow-up was 23 months (interquartile range 12-40); at median follow-up, rates of progression-free and overall survival for the cohort were 46% and 57%, respectively. Thirteen (30%) and 11 (26%) patients showed L3-SMI or TMT values below the predefined cut-offs. In Cox-regression multivariable analysis patients with low L3-SMI or TMT showed significantly worse progression-free (HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.66-11.61, p = 0.003; HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.68-11.49, p = 0.003, respectively) and overall survival (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.09-9.11, p = 0.034; HR 4.93, 95% CI 1.78-13.65, p = 0.002, respectively) compared to patients with high L3-SMI or TMT., Conclusions: Quantitative muscle mass evaluation assessed by both L3-SMI and TMT is a promising tool to identify PCNSL patients at high risk of negative outcome. Confirmatory studies on larger independent series are warranted., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (PCNSL) represents a relevant challenge in onco-hematology. PCNSL has specific molecular profile and biological characteristics that distinguish it from systemic DLBCL. Several translational studies have allowed for significant improvement in the knowledge about its genomic and molecular profile. High-dose-methotrexate-based chemotherapy followed whole-brain irradiation or autologous stem cell transplantation is the most commonly used therapeutic approach in PCNSL patients. Areas covered: This work provides an overview of the new biomarkers of PCNSL, focusing on their potential diagnostic, predictive and prognostic role. Publications in English language, peer-reviewed, high-quality international journals, were identified on PubMed. Expert opinion: Early diagnosis, a better antitumor response definition and recognition of new effective treatments are important research fields aiming to improve PCNSL outcome and management. The acquisition of new molecular and genomic knowledge in PCNSL has allowed for the attainment of promising diagnostic and prognostic tools as well as the development of clinical trials with new therapeutic approaches beyond chemotherapy agents, which have demonstrated activity in refractory/relapsed PCNSL and deserve to be investigated in first-line therapy.

Primary adrenal lymphoma (PAL) and primary renal lymphoma (PRL) are rare extranodal lymphomas, predominantly of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtype. Primary adrenal and renal lymphomas (PARL) exhibit a high predilection for the central nervous system (CNS). Therefore, current guidelines support the use of CNS prophylaxis in PARL, particularly in cases of high-risk Central Nervous System International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI). However, the route of administration (i.e. systemic vs. intrathecal chemotherapy) has not been clearly elucidated. With this in mind, we initiated an international collaboration and literature review to analyze 50 patient cases, 20 of which received CNS prophylaxis. Based on our analysis, we conclude that PARL may indicate a need for CNS chemo-prophylaxis in the form of systemic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) over intrathecal methotrexate (IT-MTX), although IT-MTX may still have utility in certain cases., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Primary diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) lymphoma of the central nervous system (CNS) (PCNSL) is a new lymphoma entity, recognized by the 2017 WHO classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid tumors. Unlike systemic DLBCL, the use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy combinations is associated with disappointing outcomes, due to low CNS bioavailability of related drugs. Therefore, international researchers investigated alternative strategies, mostly including drugs able to cross the blood-brain-barrier at low or high doses, with a progressive improvement in survival. Some effective chemotherapy combinations of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) with alkylating agents and rituximab with or without cytarabine have been tested in international randomized trials and represent the induction treatment in everyday practice, with some variations among different geographical areas. In patients aged 70 years or younger, MATRix (HD-MTX/cytarabine/thiotepa/rituximab) chemotherapy followed by consolidative high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation or whole-brain irradiation has been associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. Other treatment options, such as non-myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy, oral drug maintenance, and some targeted drugs like ibrutinib or lenalidomide, are being tested in high-level international trials. These steps toward further effective treatments are motivated by an incessant search for less neurotoxic options. Thanks to international cooperation, we can affirm that PCNSL is a potentially curable tumor, especially in young patients. However, several questions remain unanswered: the optimal treatment for elderly patients as well as the management of intraocular and meningeal disease require further scientific efforts. Beside treatments, advances on molecular and radiological diagnostic tools will increase our knowledge of this disease, allowing the possibility to anticipate diagnosis and to better categorize patients' responses. This article analyzes the available literature in this setting and provides evidence-based recommendations for the management of PCNSL patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure TC: funding from Roche; other: Sandoz. AJMF: speaker fee from Adienne; research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Beigene, Pharmacyclics, Hutchison Medipharma, Amgen, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Gilead, Novartis, and Pfizer; advisory boards from Gilead, Novartis, Juno, and PletixaPharm; inventor of patents on NGR-hTNF/RCHOP in relapsed or refractory PCNSL and SNGR-hTNF in brain tumors. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Reliable biomarkers are needed to avoid diagnostic delay and its devastating effects in patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL). We analysed the discriminating sensitivity and specificity of myeloid differentiation primary response (88) (MYD88) L265P mutation (mut-MYD88) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of both patients with newly diagnosed (n = 36) and relapsed (n = 27) PCNSL and 162 controls (118 CNS disorders and 44 extra-CNS lymphomas). The concordance of MYD88 mutational status between tumour tissue and CSF sample and the source of ILs in PCNSL tissues were also investigated. Mut-MYD88 was assessed by TaqMan-based polymerase chain reaction. IL-6 and IL-10 messenger RNA (mRNA) was assessed on PCNSL biopsies using RNAscope technology. IL levels in CSF were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Mut-MYD88 was detected in 15/17 (88%) PCNSL biopsies, with an 82% concordance in paired tissue-CSF samples. IL-10 mRNA was detected in lymphomatous B cells in most PCNSL; expression of IL-6 transcripts was negligible. In CSF samples, mut-MYD88 and high IL-10 levels were detected, respectively, in 72% and 88% of patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL and in 1% of controls; conversely, IL-6 showed a low discriminating sensitivity and specificity. Combined analysis of MYD88 and IL-10 exhibits a sensitivity and specificity to distinguish PCNSL of 94% and 98% respectively. Similar figures were recorded in patients with relapsed PCNSL. In conclusion, high detection rates of mut-MYD88 and IL-10 in CSF reflect, respectively, the MYD88 mutational status and synthesis of this IL in PCNSL tissue. These biomarkers exhibit a very high sensitivity and specificity in detecting PCNSL both at initial diagnosis and relapse. Implications of these findings in patients with lesions unsuitable for biopsy deserve to be investigated., (© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background/aims : To report our five-year experience on vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) as a single-center tertiary hospital. Methods : The ophthalmic, cytopathology, and onco-hematologic records of patients with VRL consecutively seen from 2014 to 2019 were reviewed. Results : Fifty-nine eyes of 31 patients with large B-cell VRL were included. Eighty-one percent has developed central nervous system lymphoma at the end of follow-up. Several different imaging findings were noted, including vitritis, leopard spot appearance, Bruch's membrane/RPE infiltrations, and ellipsoid zone disruption. A variable combination of MYD88-L265P mutation in the aqueous and/or in the vitreous and positive cytology/histology allowed to reach a definite diagnosis in all the patients. Therapies included intravitreal injections of methotrexate and rituximab, systemic chemotherapy, pan-encephalic radiotherapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusion : No definite guidelines exist for VRL management. It is crucial to collect as much data as possible from tertiary referral hospitals, which suitably manage a conspicuous number of VRL patients.

Background: Secondary CNS lymphoma is a rare but potentially lethal event in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We aimed to assess the activity and safety of an intensive, CNS-directed chemoimmunotherapy consolidated by autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with secondary CNS lymphoma., Methods: This international, single-arm, phase 2 trial was done in 24 hospitals in Italy, the UK, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Adults (aged 18-70 years) with histologically diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and CNS involvement at the time of primary diagnosis or at relapse and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 3 or less were enrolled and received three courses of MATRix (rituximab 375 mg/m 2 , intravenous infusion, day 0; methotrexate 3·5 g/m 2 , the first 0·5 g/m 2 in 15 min followed by 3 g/m 2 in a 3 h intravenous infusion, day 1; cytarabine 2 g/m 2 every 12 h, in 1 h intravenous infusions, days 2 and 3; thiotepa 30 mg/m 2 , 30 min intravenous infusion, day 4) followed by three courses of RICE (rituximab 375 mg/m 2 , day 1; etoposide 100 mg/m 2 per day in 500-1000 mL over a 60 min intravenous infusion, days 1, 2, and 3; ifosfamide 5 g/m 2 in 1000 mL in a 24 h intravenous infusion with mesna support, day 2; carboplatin area under the curve of 5 in 500 mL in a 1 h intravenous infusion, day 2) and carmustine-thiotepa and autologous HSCT (carmustine 400 mg/m 2 in 500 mL glucose 5% solution in a 1-2 h infusion, day -6; thiotepa 5 mg/kg in saline solution in a 2 h infusion every 12 h, days -5 and -4). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 1 year. Overall and complete response rates before autologous HSCT, duration of response, overall survival, and safety were the secondary endpoints. Analyses were in the modified intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02329080. The trial ended after accrual completion; the database lock was Dec 31, 2019., Findings: Between March 30, 2015, and Aug 3, 2018, 79 patients were enrolled. 75 patients were assessable. 319 (71%) of the 450 planned courses were delivered. At 1 year from enrolment the primary endpoint was met, 42 patients were progression free (progression-free survival 58%; 95% CI 55-61). 49 patients (65%; 95% CI 54-76) had an objective response after MATRix-RICE, 29 (39%) of whom had a complete response. 37 patients who responded had autologous HSCT. At the end of the programme, 46 patients (61%; 95% CI 51-71) had an objective response, with a median duration of objective response of 26 months (IQR 16-37). At a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 20-40), 35 patients were progression-free and 33 were alive, with a 2-year overall survival of 46% (95% CI 39-53). Grade 3-4 toxicity was most commonly haematological: neutropenia in 46 (61%) of 75 patients, thrombocytopenia in 45 (60%), and anaemia in 26 (35%). 79 serious adverse events were recorded in 42 (56%) patients; four (5%) of those 79 were lethal due to sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacteria (treatment-related mortality 5%; 95% CI 0·07-9·93)., Interpretation: MATRix-RICE plus autologous HSCT was active in this population of patients with very poor prognosis, and had an acceptable toxicity profile., Funding: Stand Up To Cancer Campaign for Cancer Research UK, the Swiss Cancer Research foundation, and the Swiss Cancer League., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

A few prospective trials in HIV-positive patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) have been reported. Investigated therapies have shown good efficacy but relevant safety problems, with high rates of interruptions, severe mucositis, septic complications, and fungal infections. Here, we report the results of a multicentre phase II trial addressing a new dose-dense, short-term therapy aimed at maintaining efficacy and improving tolerability. The experimental programme included a 36-day polychemotherapy induction followed by high-dose cytarabine-based consolidation and response-tailored BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cyatarabine, and melphalan)- conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This therapy would be considered active if ≥11 complete remissions (CR) after induction (primary endpoint) were recorded among 20 assessable patients. HIV-positive adults (median age 42, range 26-58; 16 males) with untreated BL (n = 16), HGBL (n = 3) or double-hit lymphoma (n = 1) were enrolled. All patients had high-risk features, with meningeal and bone marrow infiltration in five and nine patients respectively. The experimental programme was safe and active in a multicentre setting, with only two episodes of grade 4 non-haematological toxicity (hepatotoxicity and mucositis), and no cases of systemic fungal infections; two patients died of toxicity (bacterial infections). Response after induction (median duration: 47 days; interquartile range 41-54), was complete in 13 patients and partial in five [overall response rate = 90%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 77-100]. All responders received consolidation, and five required autologous stem cell transplant. At a median follow-up of 55 (41-89) months, 14 patients are relapse-free and 15 are alive, with a five-year progression-free survival and an overall survival of 70% (95% CI = 60-80%) and 75% (95% CI = 66-84) respectively. No patient with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/meningeal lymphoma experienced central nervous system recurrence. With respect to previously reported regimens, this programme was delivered in a shorter period, and achieved the main goal of maintaining efficacy and improving tolerability., (© 2020 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Primary DLBCL of the central nervous system (CNS) (primary central nervous system lymphoma [PCNSL]) is an exception because of the low CNS bioavailability of related drugs. NGR-human tumor necrosis factor (NGR-hTNF) targets CD13+ vessels, enhances vascular permeability and CNS access of anticancer drugs, and provides the rationale for the treatment of PCNSL with R-CHOP. Herein, we report activity and safety of R-CHOP preceded by NGR-hTNF in patients with PCNSL relapsed/refractory to high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy enrolled in a phase 2 trial. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint. A sample size of 28 patients was considered necessary to demonstrate improvement from 30% to 50% ORR. NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP would be declared active if ≥12 responses were recorded. Treatment was well tolerated; there were no cases of unexpected toxicities, dose reductions or interruptions. NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP was active, with confirmed tumor response in 21 patients (75%; 95% confidence interval, 59%-91%), which was complete in 11. Seventeen of the 21 patients with response to treatment received consolidation (ASCT, WBRT, and/or lenalidomide maintenance). At a median follow-up of 21 (range, 14-31) months, 5 patients remained relapse-free and 6 were alive. The activity of NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP is in line with the expression of CD13 in both pericytes and endothelial cells of tumor vessels. High plasma levels of chromogranin A, an NGR-hTNF inhibitor, were associated with proton pump inhibitor use and a lower remission rate, suggesting that these drugs should be avoided during TNF-based therapy. Further research on this innovative approach to CNS lymphomas is warranted. The trial was registered as EudraCT: 2014-001532-11., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)