Search

Myelodysplastic syndrome, or myelodysplastic neoplasms, are a rare finding in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) patients. More literature is needed to highlight trends of survival or treatment resistance in subpopulations to improve treatment. Here we report a single center retrospective analysis of pediatric and AYA patients from 2000 to 2022 including molecular and cytogenetic data. Using the IPSS-R and IPSS-M, which have been reported exclusively in adults, and excluding patients with bone marrow failure syndromes, we analyzed 119 pediatric and AYA patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms. Therapy-related myelodysplastic neoplasms were present in 36 % of patients, and 31 % of patients developed acute myeloid leukemia. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for the entire cohort was 45 %. Contrary to young adults and older adults, mutations were not common in pediatrics. Those who underwent stem cell transplant (SCT)(at any time) had significantly longer median OS. Although SCT at any time improved OS in the de novo myelodysplastic neoplasm group, the choice of the initial treatment with intensive chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, or SCT did not significantly alter OS. Median OS was shorter in the pediatric group (<18 years old) and longer for those with isolated deletion of 5q or TET2 mutation, but these were not significant findings. Median OS was significantly shorter in those with monosomy 7 or 7q deletion and those with therapy-related myelodysplastic neoplasms. These findings build on previously reported findings and encourage the use of SCT along with molecular and cytogenetic analysis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing financial interests or other conflicts of interests to declare for this study. Declarations of interest: none, (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The presence of BRAF mutation in hematological malignancies, excluding Hairy cell leukemia, and its significance as a driver mutation in myeloid neoplasms (MNs) remains largely understudied. This research aims to evaluate patient characteristics and outcomes of BRAF -mutated MNs. Among a cohort of 6667 patients, 48 (0.7%) had BRAF -mutated MNs. Notably, three patients exhibited sole BRAF mutation, providing evidence supporting the hypothesis of BRAF 's role as a driver mutation in MNs. In acute myeloid leukemia, the majority of patients had secondary acute myeloid leukemia, accompanied by poor-risk cytogenic and RAS pathway mutations. Although the acquisition of BRAF mutation during disease progression did not correlate with unfavorable outcomes, its clearance through chemotherapy or stem cell transplant exhibited favorable outcomes (median overall survival of 34.8 months versus 10.4 months, p  = 0.047). Furthermore, G469A was the most frequently observed BRAF mutation, differing from solid tumors and hairy cell leukemia, where V600E mutations were predominant.

Purpose: AML presenting with hyperleukocytosis is associated with poor outcomes. We aim to understand the factors associated with early mortality and overall survival (OS) to help guide management and improve early mortality., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 129 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AML and a WBC count ≥100 × 10 9 /L between January 2010 and April 2020. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios for 4-week mortality. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios for OS., Results: The median age was 65 years (range, 23-86); the median WBC was 146 × 10 9 /L (range, 100-687). Seventy-five (58%) patients had clinical leukostasis (CL). FLT3 , NPM1 , and RAS pathway mutations were detected in 63%, 45%, and 27% of patients, respectively. Cytoreduction consisted of hydroxyurea in 124 (96%) patients, cytarabine in 69 (54%), and leukapheresis in 31 (24%). The cumulative 4-week and 8-week mortality rates were 9% and 13%, respectively, all in patients age 65 years and older. By multivariate analysis, older age, CL, and thrombocytopenia <40 × 10 9 /L were independently associated with a higher 4-week mortality rate. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the median OS was 14.3 months (95% CI, 7 to 21.6), with 4-year OS of 29%. Age 65 years and older, CL, tumor lysis syndrome, elevated LDH ≥2,000 U/L, elevated lactate ≥2.2 mmol/L, and poor-risk cytogenetics were independent factors associated with worse OS., Conclusion: Hyperleukocytosis is a life-threatening hematologic emergency. Early recognition and intervention including cytoreduction, blood product support, antibiotics, and renal replacement therapy may help mitigate the risk of morbidity and early mortality.

Background: Hypomethylating agents combined with venetoclax are effective regimens in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Decitabine and cedazuridine (ASTX727) is an oral formulation of decitabine that achieves equivalent area-under-curve exposure to intravenous decitabine. We performed a single centre phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASTX727 plus venetoclax., Methods: This study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed (frontline treatment group) acute myeloid leukaemia who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (aged ≥75 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status of 2-3, or major comorbidities) or relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. Being aged 18 years or older and having an ECOG performance status of 2 or less were requirements for the relapsed or refractory disease treatment cohort, without any limits in the number of previous lines of therapy. Treatment consisted of ASTX727 (cedazuridine 100 mg and decitabine 35 mg) orally for 5 days and venetoclax 400 mg orally for 21-28 days in 28-day cycles. The primary outcome was overall response rate of ASTX727 plus venetoclax. Living patients who have not completed cycle one were not evaluable for response. Safety was analysed in all patients who started treatment. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04746235) and is ongoing. The data cutoff date for this analysis was Sept 22, 2023., Findings: Between March 16, 2021, and Sept 18, 2023, 62 patients were enrolled (49 frontline and 13 relapsed or refractory) with a median age of 78 years (IQR 73-82). 36 (58%) were male; 53 (85%) were White, 4 (6%) Black, 2 (3%) Asian and 3 (5%) other or did not answer. 48 (77%) of 62 patients were European LeukemiaNet 2022 adverse risk, 24 (39%) had antecedent myelodysplastic syndromes, 12 (19%) had previously failed a hypomethylating agent, ten (16%) had therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia, and 11 (18%) had TP53 mutations. The median follow-up time was 18·3 months (IQR 8·8-23·3). The overall response rate was 30 (64%) of 47 patients (95% CI 49-77) in frontline cohort and six (46%) of 13 patients (19-75) in relapsed or refractory cohort. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were febrile neutropenia in 11 (18%) of 62 patients, pneumonia in eight (13%), respiratory failure in five (8%), bacteraemia in four (6%), and sepsis in four (6%). Three deaths occurred in patients in remission (one sepsis, one gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and one respiratory failure) and were potentially treatment related., Interpretation: ASTX727 plus venetoclax is an active fully oral regimen and safe in most older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Our findings should be confirmed in larger multicentric studies., Funding: MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant, Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Moon Shot, Leukemia SPORE, Taiho Oncology, and Astex Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GG-M declares grants from Astex, Novartis, AbbVie, Genentech, Aprea, Curis, and Gilead; consulting fees from Astex, Acceleron, and BMS; and payment or honoraria from Astex, Acceleron, AbbVie, Gilead, Curis, Genentech, and BMS. NS declares research funding from Takeda Oncology, Astellas Pharma, Xencor, Stemline Therapeutics, and NextCure; consulting fees from Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, NKARTA, Autolus, and Sanofi; and payment or honoraria from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda Oncology, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Sanofi, and BeiGene. GI declares grants from Celgene, Kura Oncology, Syndax, Merck, Cullinan, and Novartis and consulting fees from Novartis, Kura Oncology, and Nuprobe. NJ declares research funding from Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Genentech, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, ADC Therapeutics, Cellectis, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Precision Biosciences, Fate Therapeutics, Kite and Gilead, Mingsight, Takeda, Medisix, Loxo Oncology, Novalgen, Dialectic Therapeutics, Newave, TransThera Sciences, Novartis, Carna Biosciences, Sana Biotechnology, and Kisoji Biotechnology and honoraria or advisory board participation from Pharmacyclics, Janssen, AbbVie, Genentech, AstraZeneca, BMS, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Kite and Gilead, Precision Biosciences, Beigene, Cellectis, MEI Pharma, Ipsen, CareDX, MingSight, and Novalgen. AM declares research funding from Lin Biosciences and Chimeric Therapeutics and travel support from Cero Bio. EJ declares grants from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Pfizer, and Takeda and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BMS, Genentech, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. CDD declares grants from AbbVie, Astex, ImmuneOnc, BMS, Cleave, Foghorn, Loxo, Rigel, and Servier; consulting fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Astellas, BMS, Genmab, GSK, Gilead, Jazz, Shrodinger, Servier, and Stemline; payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Astellas, BMS, Jazz, and Servier; travel support from Servier; and participation on a data safety board for Genmab. TK declares grants from BMS, AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage Pharma Group, Astellas Pharma, DrenBio, Astex, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Incyte, Cellenkos, Cyclacel, Delta-Fly Pharma, Genentech, Genfleet, Glycomimetics, Iterion, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Pulmotect, Regeneron, and SELLAS; consulting fees from AbbVie, Agios, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Genzyme, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Liberum, Novartis, Pfizer, PinotBio, Pulmotect, Sanofi-Aventis, and Servier; and payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Agios, Daiichi Sankyo, DAVA Oncology, Delta-Fly, DrenBio, Genentech, Genfleet, Genzyme, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Liberum, Novartis, Pfizer, Rigel, Sanofi-Aventis, SELLAS, and Servier. ND declares grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, BMS, Pfizer, Gilead, Servier, Genentech, Astellas, AbbVie, ImmunoGen, Amgen, Trillium, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE Therapeutics, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, and KITE and consulting fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, BMS, Pfizer, Gilead, Servier, Genentech, Astellas, AbbVie, ImmunoGen, Amgen, Trillium, Arog, Novartis, Jazz, Celgene, Syndax, Shattuck Labs, Agios, KITE, and Stemline and Menarini. MK declares grants from AbbVie, Genentech, Gilead, ImmunoGen, MEI Pharma, Precision Biosciences, Rafael Pharmaceutical, Sanofi-Aventis, and Stemline Therapeutics; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Hoffman-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Legend Biotech, MEI Pharma, Redona, Sanofi-Aventis, Sellas, Stemline Therapeutics, and Vincerx; participation on an advisory board for AbbVie, Auxenion, GmbH, Bakx Therapeutics, Dark Blue Therapeutics, Hoffman-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead, Stemline Therapeutics, and Vincerx; has a board of directors role for Immune Oncology; clinical trial support from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Cellectis, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Stemline Therapeutics; and intellectual property from Reata Pharmaceuticals. HK declares grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Immunogen, Jazz, and Novartis and payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Amphista, Ascentage, Astellas, Biologix, Curis, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, KAHR Medical, Labcorp, Novartis, Pfizer, Shenzhen Target Rx, Stemline, and Takeda. FR declares clinical trial support from Astex and Taiho Oncology and payment or honoraria from Taiho Oncology. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The treatment of adults with ALL has undergone tremendous progress over the past 15 years. The advances have been particularly marked with B-lineage ALL. The development of bispecific antibodies directed against CD19 ushered in a new era in overcoming persistent minimal disease in newly diagnosed ALL patients as well as successfully treating those with relapsed disease. The immune-conjugates targeting CD22 have also had a similarly impressive role in improving the outcome in such patients. These advances are now being extended to frontline regimens for B-lineage ALL, including the Philadelphia-chromosome-positive subtype. Over the past decade, the development of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has ushered in a new era, opening up hope when none was available for patients with particularly advanced disease. Such advances come at a considerable price for toxicity, which, however, are lessening with experience and the development of new agents to ameliorate some of the toxicities. Unfortunately, the progress for T-cell in ALL has lagged behind that of B-lineage ALL. Of late, however, there are preliminary results of potentially exciting data using monoclonal antibodies against CD38, in the form of daratumumab, and it is hoped that these will lead to an equally successful advance in the treatment of T-ALL. Despite all these advances, ALL in adults remains a formidable disease. While ongoing progress is being made, also in the therapy of older patients, we are still lagging behind the almost totally curative potential of current therapy for childhood ALL., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2021 Abuasab et al.)