Search

After the occurrence of acute rejection following solid organ transplantation, high-dose glucocorticoid (steroid) pulse therapy is commonly used. However, high-dose steroid pulse therapy is ineffective for some patients, leading to steroid resistant acute rejection, which may easily result in graft loss and severely affect patient prognosis. It is currently believed that both cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection are involved in the occurrence and development of steroid resistant acute rejection. The diagnosis and treatment of steroid resistant acute rejection after kidney transplantation have become relatively mature, while the focus on steroid resistant acute rejection after liver transplantation has been relatively low in the past in China, and a unified standardized treatment plan has not yet been formed. Therefore, this article reviews the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of steroid resistant acute rejection after liver transplantation, in order to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of steroid resistant acute rejection after liver transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rejection in kidney transplantation are significant barriers affecting the survival of recipients and transplant kidneys. To further standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of rejection in kidney transplant recipients in China, the Branch of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Medical Association and Branch of Organ Transplantation Physician of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized kidney transplant experts, transplant immunologists and other experts. Based on the " Technical specification for clinical diagnosis and treatment of renal transplant rejection (2019 edition)" issued by Branch of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Medical Association, and referring to recent domestic and international research findings, expert consensus, guidelines, and mature clinical experience, combined with the current clinical situation of rejection diagnosis and treatment in kidney transplant recipients in China, the "Guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment of rejection in kidney transplant recipients in China" have been formulated. The content covers the clinical standard diagnosis and treatment of kidney transplant hyperacute rejection, acute rejection (acute T cell-mediated rejection, acute antibody-mediated rejection), and chronic rejection (chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, chronic active antibody-mediated rejection), aiming to provide theoretical and clinical practice references for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of rejection in Chinese kidney transplant recipients, with the goal of improving and promoting the quality of kidney transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of mapping the T-cell repertoire in kidney transplant recipients, we have investigated and validated T-cell clonality, immune repertoire chronology at rejection, and contemporaneous allograft biopsy quantitative tissue injury, to better understand the pathobiology of acute T-cell fraction, T-cell repertoire and antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection. To follow the dynamic evolution of T-cell repertoire changes before and after engraftment and during biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, we sequenced 323 peripheral blood samples from 200 unique kidney transplant recipients, with (n=100) and without (n=100) biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. We report that patients who develop acute allograft rejection, have lower (p=0.01) T-cell fraction even before transplantation, followed by its rise after transplantation and at the time of acute rejection accompanied by high TCR repertoire turnover (p=0.004). Acute rejection episodes occurring after the first 6 months post-transplantation, and those with a component of antibody-mediated rejection, had the highest turnover; p=0.0016) of their T-cell repertoire. In conclusion, we validated that detecting repertoire changes in kidney transplantation correlates with post-transplant rejection episodes suggesting that T-cell receptor sequencing may provide recipient pre-transplant and post-transplant predictors of rejection risk.

All chronic and treatment-resistant acute rejections are "difficult-to-treat" and lead to progressive loss of graft function in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), as no effective treatment exists for such rejections to date. We review our experience with a novel strategy to treat such rejections by adding everolimus as a "rescue" to conventional triple maintenance therapy with prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor. We retrospectively analysed data in 28 KTR who received everolimus-based quadruple therapy at our institution for biopsy-proven chronic active T cell-mediated or antibody-mediated rejection (n = 19) or treatment-resistant acute rejections (n = 9) between 2011–2017. The primary outcome was 5-year death-censored graft survival. Main secondary outcomes were response to treatment defined by stable or improved graft function, 5-year patient survival and discontinuation rate of treatment. The Kaplan–Meier estimate for 5-year death-censored graft survival was 79% in all patients, 90% for patients with chronic active T cell-mediated rejections, 78% for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection and 67% for acute rejections. Response to treatment was achieved in 43% and 5-year patient survival was 94%. Treatment was stopped in 12 (43%) patients due to adverse events. Everolimus-based maintenance quadruple therapy, despite high rate of everolimus discontinuation due to adverse events, may be a valid approach in a subset of kidney transplant recipients with such difficult-to-treat rejections, which otherwise would lead to a high rate of graft loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionPeripheral blood (PB) molecular patterns characterizing the different effector immune pathways driving distinct kidney rejection types remain to be fully elucidated. We hypothesized that transcriptome analysis using RNA sequencing (RNAseq) in samples of kidney transplant patients would enable the identification of unique protein-coding and noncoding genes that may be able to segregate different rejection phenotypes.MethodsWe evaluated 37 biopsy-paired PB samples from the discovery cohort, with stable (STA), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) by RNAseq. Advanced machine learning tools were used to perform 3-way differential gene expression analysis to identify gene signatures associated with rejection. We then performed functional in silico analysis and validation by Fluidigm (San Francisco, CA) in 62 samples from 2 independent kidney transplant cohorts.ResultsWe found 102 genes (63 coding genes and 39 noncoding genes) associated with AMR (54 upregulated), TCMR (23 upregulated), and STA (25 upregulated) perfectly clustered with each rejection phenotype and highly correlated with main histologic lesions (ρ = 0.91). For the genes associated with AMR, we found enrichment in regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress, adaptive immunity, and Ig class-switching. In the validation, we found that the SIGLEC17P pseudogene and 9 SIGLEC17P-related coding genes were highly expressed among AMR but not in TCMR and STA samples.ConclusionsThis analysis identifies a critical gene signature in PB in kidney transplant patients undergoing AMR, sufficient to differentiate them from patients with TCMR and immunologically quiescent kidney allografts. Our findings provide the basis for new studies dissecting the role of noncoding genes in the pathophysiology of kidney allograft rejection and their potential value as noninvasive biomarkers of the rejection process.

In this clinical validation study, we developed and validated a urinary Q-Score generated from the quantitative test QSant, formerly known as QiSant, for the detection of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in kidney transplants. Using a cohort of 223 distinct urine samples collected from three independent sites and from both adult and pediatric renal transplant patients, we examined the diagnostic utility of the urinary Q-Score for detection of acute rejection in renal allografts. Statistical models based upon the measurements of the six QSant biomarkers (cell-free DNA, methylated-cell-free DNA, clusterin, CXCL10, creatinine, and total protein) generated a renal transplant Q-Score that reliably differentiated stable allografts from acute rejections in both adult and pediatric renal transplant patients. The composite Q-Score was able to detect both T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection patients and differentiate them from stable non-rejecting patients with a receiver-operator characteristic curve area under the curve of 99.8% and an accuracy of 98.2%. Q-Scores < 32 indicated the absence of active rejection and Q-Scores ≥ 32 indicated an increased risk of active rejection. At the Q-Score cutoff of 32, the overall sensitivity was 95.8% and specificity was 99.3%. At a prevalence of 25%, positive and negative predictive values for active rejection were 98.0% and 98.6%, respectively. The Q-Score also detected subclinical rejection in patients without an elevated serum creatinine level but identified by a protocol biopsy. This study confirms that QSant is an accurate and quantitative measurement suitable for routine monitoring of renal allograft status.

Despite the growing interest in the role of regulatory B cells (Bregs) in autoimmunity, their distinct role and function in kidney transplant outcomes remain elusive. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the proportion of Bregs, transitional Bregs (tBregs) and memory Bregs (mBregs) and their capacity to produce IL-10 in non-rejected (NR) versus rejected (RJ) kidney transplant recipients. In the NR group, we observed a significant increase in the proportion of mBregs (CD19+CD24hiCD27+) but no difference in tBregs (CD19+CD24hiCD38+), as compared to the RJ group. We also observed a significant increase in IL-10-producing mBregs (CD19+CD24hiCD27+IL-10+) in the NR group. As our group and others have previously reported a potential role of the human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) in human renal allograft survival, notably through IL-10, we then investigated possible crosstalk between HLA-G and IL-10+ mBregs. Our ex vivo data suggest a role of HLA-G in enhancing IL-10+ mBreg expansion upon stimulation, which further decreased CD3+ T cell proliferation capability. Using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), we identified potential key signaling pathways involved in HLA-G-driven IL-10+ mBreg expansion, such as the MAPK, TNF and chemokine signaling pathways. Together, our study highlights a novel HLA-G-mediated IL-10-producing mBreg pathway that may serve as a therapeutic target to improve kidney allograft survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early diagnosis of acute rejection is of significance for the protection of renal allograft function. Pathological puncture biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of acute rejection of renal allografts. Nevertheless, it may provoke multiple complications, such as bleeding, infection and renal parenchymal injury, which limit its widespread application. In recent years, the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute rejection has been constantly improved. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble technique has further enhanced the diagnostic specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, making it possible to replace pathological puncture biopsy. Besides, in the field of acute rejection treatment, microbubble ultrasonic cavitation may promote local delivery of immunosuppressants by inducing sonoporation and exhibit anti-rejection effect. In this article, the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of acute rejection after kidney transplantation was reviewed, aiming to provide reference for widespread application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in kidney transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management of long-term immune suppressive medication in kidney transplant recipients is a poorly explored field in the area of transplant medicine. In particular, older recipients are at an increased risk for side effects and have an exponentially increased risk of infection-related death. In contrast, an aged immune system decreases the risk of acute T-cell-mediated rejection in older recipients. Recent advances in alloimmunity research have shown a rapid and substantial decline in polyfunctional, high-risk CD4+ T cells post-transplantation. This lowers the direct alloreactivity responsible for T-cell-mediated rejection, also known as donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (c-aABMR) is the most frequent cause of kidney graft loss in the long term. However, in older adults, c-aABMR as a cause of graft loss is outnumbered by death with a functioning graft. In addition, DSA development and a diagnosis of c-aABMR plateau ~10 years after transplantation, resulting in a very low risk for rejection thereafter. The intensity of immune suppression regimes could likely be reduced accordingly, but trials in this area are scarce. Tacrolimus monotherapy for 1 year after transplantation seems feasible in older kidney transplant recipients with standard immunological risk, showing the expected benefits of fewer infections and better vaccination responses.

In this cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of mapping the T-cell repertoire in kidney transplant recipients, we have investigated and validated T-cell clonality, immune repertoire chronology at rejection, and contemporaneous allograft biopsy quantitative tissue injury, to better understand the pathobiology of acute T-cell fraction, T-cell repertoire and antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection. To follow the dynamic evolution of T-cell repertoire changes before and after engraftment and during biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, we sequenced 323 peripheral blood samples from 200 unique kidney transplant recipients, with (n=100) and without (n=100) biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. We report that patients who develop acute allograft rejection, have lower (p=0.01) T-cell fraction even before transplantation, followed by its rise after transplantation and at the time of acute rejection accompanied by high TCR repertoire turnover (p=0.004). Acute rejection episodes occurring after the first 6 months posttransplantation, and those with a component of antibody-mediated rejection, had the highest turnover; p=0.0016) of their T-cell repertoire. In conclusion, we validated that detecting repertoire changes in kidney transplantation correlates with post-transplant rejection episodes suggesting that T-cell receptor sequencing may provide recipient pre-transplant and posttransplant predictors of rejection risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after liver transplantation (LT) on the alterations in the gut microbiota (GM) and associated intestinal environment represented by fecal organic acids (OAs) require further elucidation. A rat allogeneic LT model was prepared without immunosuppressants or antibiotics, and a syngeneic model was used as a control. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of fecal samples at fixed time points were performed. Correlation analyses were also performed between liver function and GMs and OA levels. In the allogeneic TCMR group, the number of predominant obligate anaerobes decreased as liver function declined. Clostridioides difficile, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus were significantly increased. Regarding fecal OA concentration, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were depleted as liver function declined. In contrast, in the syngeneic group, GM and OAs exhibited only slight, transient, and reversible disturbances. In addition, alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin were positively correlated with the number of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus, and negatively correlated with the fecal concentration of SCFAs. The allogeneic TCMR model demonstrated distinct dysbiosis and depletion of fecal OAs as TCMR progressed after LT. The degree of graft injury was closely related to the number of specific bacterial strains and the concentrations of fecal SCFAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of mapping the T-cell repertoire in kidney transplant recipients, we have investigated and validated T-cell clonality, immune repertoire chronology at rejection, and contemporaneous allograft biopsy quantitative tissue injury, to better understand the pathobiology of acute T-cell fraction, T-cell repertoire and antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection. To follow the dynamic evolution of T-cell repertoire changes before and after engraftment and during biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, we sequenced 323 peripheral blood samples from 200 unique kidney transplant recipients, with (n=100) and without (n=100) biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. We report that patients who develop acute allograft rejection, have lower (p=0.01) T-cell fraction even before transplantation, followed by its rise after transplantation and at the time of acute rejection accompanied by high TCR repertoire turnover (p=0.004). Acute rejection episodes occurring after the first 6 months post-transplantation, and those with a component of antibody-mediated rejection, had the highest turnover; p=0.0016) of their T-cell repertoire. In conclusion, we validated that detecting repertoire changes in kidney transplantation correlates with post-transplant rejection episodes suggesting that T-cell receptor sequencing may provide recipient pre-transplant and post-transplant predictors of rejection risk.

The continuous evolution of metabolomics over the past two decades has stimulated the search for metabolic biomarkers of many diseases. Metabolomic data measured from urinary samples can provide rich information of the biological events triggered by organ rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. With additional validation, metabolic markers can be used to build clinically useful diagnostic tools. However, there are many methodological steps ranging from data processing to modeling that can influence the performance of the resulting metabolomic classifiers. In this study we focus on the comparison of various classification methods that can handle the complex structure of metabolomic data, including regularized classifiers, partial least squares discriminant analysis, and nonlinear classification models. We also examine the effectiveness of a physiological normalization technique widely used in the clinical and biochemical literature but not extensively analyzed and compared in urine metabolomic studies. While the main objective of this work is to interrogate metabolomic data of pediatric kidney transplant recipients to improve the diagnosis of T cell‐mediated rejection (TCMR), we also analyze three independent datasets from other disease conditions to investigate the generalizability of our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past 70 years, kidney transplantation has become not only the most mature but also the highest-success-rate surgery among all organ transplantation surgeries. However, the long-term survival of kidney transplant recipients is still challenged by such key factors as ischemia-reperfusion injury related to kidney transplantation, rejection, chronic renal allograft dysfunction, renal allograft fibrosis, immunosuppressive therapy, infections and others. Relevant fundamental and clinical studies have emerged endlessly. At the same time, the research related to kidney transplantation also becomes a new hot spot accordingly in the context of the normalization of novel coronavirus pneumonia. This article reviewed the cutting-edge hot spots in relation to the fundamental and clinical aspects of kidney transplantation together with relevant new techniques and new visions. The studies included in this article focused on the reports published by Chinese teams that are more applicable to the current situation of kidney transplantation in China, for the purpose of providing new thoughts and strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of kidney transplantation related issues in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Peripheral blood (PB) molecular patterns characterizing the different effector immune pathways driving distinct kidney rejection types remain to be fully elucidated. We hypothesized that transcriptome analysis using RNA sequencing (RNAseq) in samples of kidney transplant patients would enable the identification of unique protein-coding and noncoding genes that may be able to segregate different rejection phenotypes. Methods: We evaluated 37 biopsy-paired PB samples from the discovery cohort, with stable (STA), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) by RNAseq. Advanced machine learning tools were used to perform 3-way differential gene expression analysis to identify gene signatures associated with rejection. We then performed functional in silico analysis and validation by Fluidigm (San Francisco, CA) in 62 samples from 2 independent kidney transplant cohorts. Results: We found 102 genes (63 coding genes and 39 noncoding genes) associated with AMR (54 upregulated), TCMR (23 upregulated), and STA (25 upregulated) perfectly clustered with each rejection phenotype and highly correlated with main histologic lesions (ρ = 0.91). For the genes associated with AMR, we found enrichment in regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress, adaptive immunity, and Ig class-switching. In the validation, we found that the SIGLEC17P pseudogene and 9 SIGLEC17P-related coding genes were highly expressed among AMR but not in TCMR and STA samples. Conclusions: This analysis identifies a critical gene signature in PB in kidney transplant patients undergoing AMR, sufficient to differentiate them from patients with TCMR and immunologically quiescent kidney allografts. Our findings provide the basis for new studies dissecting the role of noncoding genes in the pathophysiology of kidney allograft rejection and their potential value as noninvasive biomarkers of the rejection process.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) based liquid kidney biopsies have the potential to detect the chances of kidney transplant rejection. Several studies have found that dd-cfDNA can be used to determine the risk of kidney transplant rejection and may correlate with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A high concentration of dd-cfDNA in the body fluids may indicate possible transplant rejection since dd-cfDNA is released as a result of apoptotic and necrotic processes initiated by the recipient's immune system. dd-cfDNA assays have advantages over conventional biopsies since they are noninvasive, and therefore, have the potential to provide a safe and reliable biomarker. Different dd-cfDNA levels have been reported above a number of cutoff thresholds: ABMR at 2.45% and TCMR at 1.3%, compared with 0.44% in healthy patients; and eGFR at 2.5%, a decrease of 25% compared with healthy patients. These results indicate the levels of dd-cfDNA that may be used to signal possible kidney rejection. dd-cfDNA assay is a rapid technique, making it particularly useful in emergencies, and further research into its use in the study of kidney rejection should prove beneficial.

T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is an important rejection type in kidney transplantation, characterized by T cells and macrophages infiltration. The application of bioinformatic analysis in genomic research has been widely used. In the present study, Microarray data was analyzed to identify the potential diagnostic markers of TCMR in kidney transplantation. Cell-type identification by estimating relative subsets of RNA transcript (CIBERSORT) was performed to determine the distribution of immune cell infiltration in the pathology. Totally 129 upregulated differently expressed genes (DEGs) and 378 downregulated DEGs were identified. The GO and KEGG results demonstrated that DEGs were mainly associated with pathways and diseases involved in immune response. The intersection of the two algorithms (PPI network and LASSO) contains three overlapping genes (CXCR6, CXCL13 and FCGR1A). After verification in GSE69677, only CXCR6 and CXCL13 were selected. Immune cells Infiltration analysis demonstrated that CXCR6 and CXCL13 were positively correlated with gamma delta T cells (p < 0.001), CD4+ memory activated T cells (p < 0.001), CD8+ T cells (p < 0.001) and M1 macrophages (p = 0.006), and negatively correlated with M2 macrophages (p < 0.001) and regulatory T cells (p < 0.001). Immunohistochemical staining and image analysis confirmed the overexpression of CXCR6 and CXCL13 in human allograft TCMR samples. CXCR6 and CXCL13 could be diagnostic biomarkers of TCMR and potential targets for immunotherapy in patients with TCMR.

Management of long-term immunosuppression following liver transplantation (LT) remains empirical. Surveillance liver biopsies in combination with transcriptional profiling could overcome this challenge by identifying recipients with active alloimmune-mediated liver damage despite normal liver tests, but this approach lacks applicability. Our aim was to investigate the utility of non-invasive tools for the stratification of stable long-term survivors of LT, according to their immunological risk and need for immunosuppression. We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre study of 190 adult LT recipients assessed to determine their eligibility to participate in an immunosuppression withdrawal trial. Patients had stable liver allograft function and had been transplanted for non-autoimmune non-replicative viral liver disease >3 years before inclusion. We performed histological, immunogenetic and serological studies and measured the intrahepatic transcript levels of an 11-gene classifier highly specific for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In this cohort, 35.8% of patients harboured clinically silent fibro-inflammatory liver lesions (13.7% had mild damage and 22.1% had moderate-to-severe damage). The severity of liver allograft damage was positively associated with TCMR-related transcripts, class II donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), ALT, AST, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and negatively correlated with serum creatinine and tacrolimus trough levels. Liver biopsies were stratified according to their TCMR transcript levels using a cut-off derived from biopsies with clinically significant TCMR. Two multivariable prediction models, integrating ALT+LSM or ALT+class II DSAs, had a high discriminative capacity for classifying patients with or without alloimmune damage. The latter model performed well in an independent cohort of 156 liver biopsies obtained from paediatric liver recipients with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria. ALT, class II DSAs and LSM are valuable tools to non-invasively identify stable LT recipients without significant underlying alloimmunity who could benefit from minimisation of immunosuppression. A large proportion of liver transplant patients with normal liver tests have inflammatory liver lesions, which in 17% of cases are molecularly indistinguishable from those seen at the time of rejection. ALT, class II donor-specific antibodies and liver stiffness are useful in identifying patients with this form of subclinical rejection. We propose these markers as a useful tool to help clinicians determine if the immunosuppression administered is adequate. [Display omitted] • 22% of stable liver recipients harbour moderate-to-severe subclinical immune allograft damage. • Subclinical damage is linked to allograft immunogenicity and degree of immunosuppression. • Recipients with active underlying alloimmunity can be identified using non-invasive markers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study aims to examine the association of LIM zinc finger domain containing 1 (LIMS1) genotype with allograft rejection in an independent kidney transplant cohort. Methods We genotyped 841 kidney transplant recipients for the LIMS1 rs893403 variant by Sanger sequencing followed by polymerase chain reaction confirmation of the deletion. Recipients who were homozygous for the LIMS1 rs893403 genotype GG were compared with the AA/AG genotypes. The primary outcome was T cell–mediated or antibody-mediated rejection (TCMR or ABMR, respectively) and secondary outcome was allograft loss. Results After a median follow-up of 11.4 years, the rate of TCMR was higher in recipients with the GG genotype (n  = 200) compared with the AA/AG genotypes (n  = 641) [25 (12.5%) versus 35 (5.5%); P = 0.001] while ABMR did not differ by genotype [18 (9.0%) versus 62 (9.7%)]. Recipients with the GG genotype had 2.4 times higher risk of TCMR than those who did not have this genotype [adjusted hazard ratio2.43 (95% confidence interval 1.44–4.12); P = 0.001]. A total of 189 (22.5%) recipients lost their allografts during follow-up. Kaplan–Meier estimates of 5-year (94.3% versus 94.4%; P = 0.99) and 10-year graft survival rates (86.9% versus 83.4%; P = 0.31) did not differ significantly in the GG versus AA/AG groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that recipient LIMS1 risk genotype is associated with an increased risk of TCMR after kidney transplantation, confirming the role of the LIMS1 locus in allograft rejection. These findings may have clinical implications for the prediction and clinical management of kidney transplant rejection by pretransplant genetic testing of recipients and donors for LIMS1 risk genotype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. Annette Jackson: HLA consultant (Hansa Biopharma); Research reagents/grant (CareDx); Speaker bureau (One Lambda/ThermoFisher). Josh Levitsky: Advisor (Eurofins; eGenesis); Speaker for Takeda; Mallinckrodt. Richard Taubert: Research grant (Oncocyte/Chronix Biomedical). The other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunological rejection is an important factor resulting in allograft dysfunction, and more valid therapeutic methods need to be explored to improve allograft outcomes. Many researches have indicated that artemisinin and its derivative exhibits immunosuppressive functions, apart from serving as a traditional anti-malarial drug. In this assay, we further explored the therapeutic effects of artemisinin for transplant rejection in a rat cardiac transplantation model. We found that it markedly attenuated allograft rejection and histological injury and significantly prolonged the survival of allograft. Upon further exploring the mechanism, we demonstrated that artemisinin not only attenuated T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) by reducing effector T cell infiltration and inflammatory cytokine secretion and increasing regulatory T cell infiltration and immunoregulatory cytokine levels, but also attenuated antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) through inhibition of B cells activation and antibody production. Furthermore, artemisinin also reduced macrophage infiltration in allografts, which was determined to be important for TCMR and ABMR. Moreover, we demonstrated that artemisinin significantly inhibited the function of pure T cells, B cells, and macrophages in vitro. All in all, this study provide evidence that artemisinin significantly attenuates TCMR and ABMR by targeting multiple effectors. Therefore, this agent might have potential for use in clinical settings to protect against transplant rejection.

Immunological rejection is an important factor resulting in allograft dysfunction, and more valid therapeutic methods need to be explored to improve allograft outcomes. Many researches have indicated that artemisinin and its derivative exhibits immunosuppressive functions, apart from serving as a traditional anti-malarial drug. In this assay, we further explored the therapeutic effects of artemisinin for transplant rejection in a rat cardiac transplantation model. We found that it markedly attenuated allograft rejection and histological injury and significantly prolonged the survival of allograft. Upon further exploring the mechanism, we demonstrated that artemisinin not only attenuated T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) by reducing effector T cell infiltration and inflammatory cytokine secretion and increasing regulatory T cell infiltration and immunoregulatory cytokine levels, but also attenuated antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) through inhibition of B cells activation and antibody production. Furthermore, artemisinin also reduced macrophage infiltration in allografts, which was determined to be important for TCMR and ABMR. Moreover, we demonstrated that artemisinin significantly inhibited the function of pure T cells, B cells, and macrophages in vitro. All in all, this study provide evidence that artemisinin significantly attenuates TCMR and ABMR by targeting multiple effectors. Therefore, this agent might have potential for use in clinical settings to protect against transplant rejection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Banff conference on allograft pathology (Banff conference) and the establishment of Banff classification on allograft pathology (Banff classification) are milestones in the development of international allograft pathology. At present, all organ transplantation centers around the world routinely perform pathological diagnosis by biopsy of the transplant kidney according to Banff classification. Subsequently, the consensus process and update mode of Banff classification for transplant kidney was quickly extended to transplant heart, lung, liver, pancreas, and small intestine, etc. The Banff conference has not only become a thematic meeting that includes the pathology study and discussion of various transplant organs, but also gradually developed unified diagnostic standard for the biopsy of each transplant organ, which better promoted the accurate diagnosis and treatment of complications after organ transplantation. This article summarized the history of international allograft pathology research, the Banff conference and Banff classification in promoting organ transplantation, which aimed to provide a reference for the smooth development of clinical organ transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Preformed donor‐reactive T cells are relatively resistant to standard immunosuppression and account for an increased incidence of T cell‐mediated rejection (TCMR) and inferior kidney allograft outcomes. We analyzed 150 living donor kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) of a first kidney allograft. Ninety‐eight ABO‐compatible (ABOc) and 52 ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) KTRs were included. Samples were collected at 6 time points, before rituximab, before immunoadsorption and pretransplantation, at +1, +2, and +3 months posttransplantation, and donor‐reactive T cells were measured by interferon‐γ ELISPOT assay. Twenty of 98 ABOc (20%) and 12 of 52 ABOi KTRs (23%) showed positive pretransplant ELISPOT. Eight of 20 ABOc‐KTRs (40%) with positive pretransplant ELISPOT showed TCMR, whereas 17 of 78 ABOc‐KTRs (22%) with negative pretransplant ELISPOT did (P = 0.148). Seven of 12 ABOi KTRs (57%) with positive pretransplant ELISPOT showed TCMR, whereas only 3 of 40 ABOi KTRs (8%) with negative pretransplant ELISPOT did (P < 0.001). Interestingly, 6 of 7 ABOi KTRs with positive pretransplant ELISPOT that persists after ABO desensitization developed TCMR. Among 118 KTRs with negative pretransplant ELISPOT, 10 of 72 ABOc‐KTRs (14%), but 0 of 46 ABOi KTRs, developed positive posttransplant ELISPOT (P = 0.006). Preformed donor‐reactive T cells that persist despite ABO desensitization identify KTRs at highest risk of TCMR. Less de‐novo donor‐reactive T cells after ABO desensitization may account for less TCMR. Both, the use of rituximab and early initiation of calcineurin inhibitor‐based maintenance immunosuppression may contribute to these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Rejection remains the most important factor limiting the survival of transplanted kidneys. Although a pathological biopsy of the transplanted kidney is the gold standard for diagnosing rejection, its limitations prevent it from being used as a routine monitoring method. Recently, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation testing has become an important means of assessing the body's immune system, however, its application value and strategy in the field of kidney transplantation need further exploration. Additionally, the development and utilization of routine test parameters are also important methods for exploring diagnostic strategies and predictive models for kidney transplant diseases. This study aims to explore the correlation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), as well as their diagnostic value, in conjunction with routine blood tests., Methods: A total of 154 kidney transplant recipients, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were treated at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January to December, 2021, were selected as the study subjects. They were assigned into a stable group, a TCMR group, and an ABMR group, based on the occurrence and type of rejection. The basic and clinical data of these recipients were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. The transplant kidney function, routine blood tests, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation data of the TCMR group and the ABMR group before rejection treatment were compared with those of the stable group., Results: The stable, TCMR group, and ABMR group showed no statistically significant differences in immunosuppressive maintenance regimens or sources of transplanted kidneys (all P >0.05). However, the post-transplant duration was significantly longer in the ABMR group compared with the stable group ( P <0.001) and the TCMR group ( P <0.05). Regarding kidney function, serum creatinine levels in the ABMR group were higher than in the stable group and the TCMR group (both P <0.01), with the TCMR group also showing higher levels than the stable group ( P <0.01). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had significantly higher blood urea nitrogen levels than the stable group ( P <0.01), with no statistically significant difference between TCMR and ABMR groups ( P >0.05). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in both TCMR and ABMR groups compared with the stable group (both P <0.01). In routine blood tests, the ABMR group had lower hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and platelet count than the stable group (all P <0.05). The TCMR group had higher neutrophil percentage ( P <0.05) and count ( P <0.05) than the stable group, and the ABMR group had a higher neutrophil percentage than the stable group ( P <0.05). The eosinophil percentage and count in the TCMR group were lower than in the stable and ABMR groups (all P <0.05). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had lower basophil percentage and count, as well as lower lymphocyte percentage and count, compared with the stable group (all P <0.05). There were no significant differences in monocyte percentage and count among the 3 groups (all P >0.05). In lymphocyte subpopulations, the TCMR and ABMR groups had lower counts of CD45 + cells and T cells compared with the stable group (all P <0.05). The TCMR group also had lower counts of CD4 + T cells, NK cells, and B cells than the stable group (all P <0.05). There were no significant differences in the T cell percentage, CD4 + T cell percentage, CD8 + T cell percentage and their counts, CD4 + /CD8 + T cell ratio, NK cell percentage, and B cell percentage among the stable, TCMR, and ABMR groups (all P >0.05)., Conclusions: The occurrence of rejection leads to impaired transplant kidney function, accompanied by characteristic changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in kidney transplant recipients. The different characteristics of changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations during TCMR and ABMR may help predict and diagnose rejection and differentiate between TCMR and ABMR.

Background The emergence of molecular systems offers opportunities for improving the assessment of rejection in heart transplant biopsy specimens. The present study developed a microarray-based system for assessing heart transplant endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) specimens. Methods We analyzed 331 protocol or for-cause EMB specimens from 221 subjects in 3 centers (Edmonton, Bologna, and Paris). Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) and archetype analysis used rejection-associated transcripts (RATs) shown in kidney transplants to be associated with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) or T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR), or both. To compare EMB specimens to kidney biopsy specimens, rejection status in both was simplified to TCMR, ABMR, or no rejection. Results The pattern of RAT expression was similar in EMB and kidney specimens, permitting use of RATs to assign scores and group (“cluster”) membership to each EMB, independent of histology. Three clusters emerged in EMB specimens, similar to kidney specimens: TCMR, ABMR, and no rejection. This permitted each EMB specimen to be given 3 scores and assigned to 1 cluster by its highest score. There was significant agreement between molecular phenotype—archetype scores or clusters—and both histologic diagnoses and donor-specific antibody. Area under curve estimates for predicting histologic TCMR, ABMR, and no rejection by molecular assessment were lower in EMB specimens than in kidney specimens, reflecting more uncertainty in EMB specimens, particularly in histologic diagnosis of TCMR. Conclusions Rejection-associated transcripts can be used to estimate the probability of TCMR and ABMR in heart transplant specimens, providing a new dimension to improve the accuracy of diagnoses and an independent system for recalibrating the histology guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is growing interest in daratumumab in the solid organ transplant realm owing to the potential immunomodulatory effects on CD38-expressing cells, primarily plasma cells, as they have a key role in antibody production. In particular there is interest in use of daratumumab for desensitization and potential treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. However, ongoing investigation with daratumumab has shown potential immunologic concerns in vitro, with a significant increase in populations of CD4-positive cytotoxic T cells and CD8-positive helper T cells in both peripheral blood and bone marrow that could lead to acute T cell-mediated rejection in the solid organ transplant patient. To date, there are no published reports of an association with daratumumab use and T cell-mediated rejection in vivo. In this case report we present what is to our knowledge the first documented case of an early severe T cell-mediated rejection in a low-immunologic-risk living-donor kidney transplant recipient who received daratumumab for multiple myeloma maintenance prior to transplant., (Copyright © 2023 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Xenotransplantation is a potential solution to the limited supply of donor organs. While early barriers to xenograft acceptance, such as hyperacute rejection, are now largely avoided through genetic engineering, the next frontier in successful xenograft survival will require prevention of T cell-mediated rejection. Most successful immunosuppressive regimens in xenotransplantation utilize T cell depletion with antibody therapy. Additionally, the use of T cell costimulatory blockade - specifically blockade of the CD40-CD154 pathway - shows promise with several reports of long-term xenograft survival. Additional therapies, such as transgenic expression of T cell coinhibitory molecules or transfer of immunomodulatory cells to promote tolerance, may be necessary to achieve reliable long-term xenograft acceptance. Further studies in pre-clinical models are essential in order to optimize these regimens prior to trials in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ushigome H, Okamoto M, Koshino K, Nobori S, Okajima H, Masuzawa N, Urasaki K, Yoshimura N. Findings of graft biopsy specimens within 90 days after ABO blood group incompatible living donor kidney transplantation compared with ABO-identical and non-identical transplantation. Clin Transplant 2010: 24 (Suppl. 22): 16–21. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. As immunosuppressive therapy has advanced, we have markedly improved the outcome of ABO blood group incompatible living donor kidney transplantation. Consequently, graft survival at early phase after ABO-incompatible transplantation has been favorable than ABO-compatible transplantation in Japan. But in these days, it has been assumed that transplant glomerulopathy within one yr after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation might be significantly precipitated. That may be because of chronic, active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We performed kidney graft biopsies at the early phase within 90 d after living donor kidney transplantation that involved the episode and protocol biopsies and studied findings of graft biopsy specimens when compared with ABO incompatible and compatible involving non-identical and identical transplantations. In ABO-incompatible transplant cases, the ratio occurring glomerulitis, especially severe injury of g 2–3, was significantly higher than that of identical and non-identical transplant cases (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in t score, i score, ptc score and v score between three transplant groups. The cases occurring AMR were concordant with the cases recognized with severe glomerulitis. AMR was difficult to be diagnosed by C4d analysis in ABO-incompatible transplant cases. Glomerular injury score, g score, may be considered as more significant and the injury should be cured thoroughly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence and long-term impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with serial histology and correlated TCMR events with the risk of graft loss. After a ~30% incidence of a first Banff Borderline or greater TCMR detected on for-cause (17%) or surveillance (13%) biopsies, persistent (37.4%) or subsequent (26.3%) TCMR occurred in 64% of recipients on follow-up biopsies. Alloimmune risk categories based on the HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet molecular mismatch correlated with the number of TCMR events (p = .002) and Banff TCMR grade (p = .007). Both a first and second TCMR event correlated with death-censored and all-cause graft loss when adjusted for baseline covariates and other significant time-dependent covariates such as DGF and ABMR. Therefore, a substantial portion of kidney transplant recipients, especially those with intermediate and high HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, remain under-immunosuppressed, which in turn identifies the need for novel agents that can more effectively prevent or treat TCMR., (© 2021 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Background: Despite advances in immune suppression, kidney allograft rejection and other injuries remain a significant clinical concern, particularly with regards to long-term allograft survival. Evaluation of immune activity can provide information about rejection status and help guide interventions to extend allograft life. Here, we describe the validation of a blood gene expression classifier developed to differentiate immune quiescence from both T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR)., Methods: A five-gene classifier (DCAF12, MARCH8, FLT3, IL1R2, and PDCD1) was developed on 56 peripheral blood samples and validated on two sample sets independent of the training cohort. The primary validation set comprised 98 quiescence samples and 18 rejection samples: seven TCMR, ten ABMR, and one mixed rejection. The second validation set included eight quiescence and 11 rejection samples: seven TCMR, two ABMR, and two mixed rejection. AlloSure donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was also evaluated., Results: AlloMap Kidney classifier scores in the primary validation set differed significantly between quiescence (median, 9.49; IQR, 7.68-11.53) and rejection (median, 13.09; IQR, 11.25-15.28), with P <0.001. In the second validation set, the cohorts were statistically different ( P =0.03) and the medians were similar to the primary validation set. The AUC for discriminating rejection from quiescence was 0.786 for the primary validation and 0.800 for the second validation. AlloMap Kidney results were not significantly correlated with AlloSure, although both were elevated in rejection. The ability to discriminate rejection from quiescence was improved when AlloSure and AlloMap Kidney were used together (AUC, 0.894)., Conclusion: Validation of AlloMap Kidney demonstrated the ability to differentiate between rejection and immune quiescence using a range of scores. The diagnostic performance suggests that assessment of the mechanisms of immunologic activity is complementary to allograft injury information derived from AlloSure dd-cfDNA. Together, these biomarkers offer a more comprehensive assessment of allograft health and immune quiescence., Competing Interests: E. Akalin reports receiving research funding from Angion, Astellas, CareDx, and National Institutes of Health (NIH); and having consultancy agreements with, receiving honoraria from, and serving as a scientific advisor for or member of CareDx and Immucor. D.C. Brennan reports having consultancy agreements with CareDx, Medeor, Sanofi, and Veloxis; receiving research funding from CareDx and Natera; receiving honoraria from CareDx, Sanofi, and Veloxis; and serving as a scientific advisor for or member of the editorial boards of Transplantation and UpToDate. D.C. Brennan, J.S. Bromberg, R. Weir, S. Bunnapradist, R. Delos Santos, and A. Langone report being DART investigators. J.S. Bromberg reports receiving research funding from Angion, Astellas, CareDx, Natera, Novartis, and Quark; having consultancy agreements with Eurofins; and serving as a scientific advisor for, or member of, NIH and Transplantation. S. Bunnapradist reports receiving research funding from Alexion, Angion, Astellas, CareDx, and Merck; receiving honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), CareDx, Sanofi, and Veloxis; serving on speakers bureau for BMS, CareDx, Natera, Veloxis, and Vitaeris; and having consultancy agreements with CareDx. R. Delos Santos reports having other interests/relationships with the American Society of Transplantation (AST) Conflict of Interest Committee and AST Transplant Nephrology Fellowship Training Accreditation Program Review Committee; receiving research funding from CareDx, Merck, and Veloxis; having ownership interest in Pfizer; and receiving honoraria from UpToDate. S. Dholakia reports having ownership interest in CareDx. S. Dholakia, X. Jin, H. Xu, and R.N. Woodward report being employees of CareDx. A. Djamali reports having consultancy agreements with, receiving honoraria from, and serving as a scientific advisor for or member of CareDx and CSL; and receiving research funding from CareDx and Takeda. X. Jin reports having ownership interest in CareDx. M.R. Weir reports having consultancy agreements (all are modest, <$10,000) with, receiving honoraria from, and serving as a scientific advisor for or member of AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, CareDx, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Vifor Pharma. R.N. Woodward reports having ownership interest in CareDx. H. Xu reports having ownership interest in CareDx and Proxim Diagnostics, and having consultancy agreements with Proxim Diagnostics., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.)