Search

Study design: Individual interview and questionnaire of a regional spinal cord-injured (SCI) population. Objective: Local health care centres are mainly responsible for the SCI patients health care and rehabilitation after initial hospitalization in Finland. The purpose of the present study was to study aspects of the SCI patients life situation and their opinion of the health care services after 1 year since the injury. Setting: Regional study in Central Finland. Methods: Subjects were individually interviewed in their homes using a semi-structured questionnaire, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Results: The female/male ratio was 1:4. The mean age at the time of injury was 34 years in female and 40 in male. Traffic accidents accounted for 46% of the injuries. In all, 48 subjects (63%) used electrical or manual wheelchair or both. Most subjects regarded their living conditions as good having enough personal assistance in their everyday life. Only 10% of the subjects were employed. Half of the subjects had had out-patient physiotherapy, but no other therapies after 1 year since the injury. More than half of the subjects were dissatisfied with the current health care services. Many had experienced complications after the initial hospitalization, especially urinary tract infections, decubitus ulcers and neurogenic-type pain. FIM classified well according to the disability groups. The motor complete tetraplegic group had the lowest mean scores (63) and the recovered group the highest ones (122). There was no association between the FIM and the BDI results. There was a correlation between the BDI and the subject's age at the time of the injury and the year of the injury. The older the subjects were when injuried, the higher were the BDI scores, that is, they had more depressive symptoms. Those injuried in the 1990s had the highest BDI scores. Nearly one-third of the subjects had mild, moderate or severe depression. Conclusions: The reported medical complications, depression and dissatisfaction with the health care services support a life-long care for SCI patients in Jyvaskyla Central hospital, not in the local health care centres. The psychological services, for example, prevention and treatment of depression, in particular, require more attention.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcome of intranasal calcitonin treatment of elderly hip fracture patients on pain, bone loss, functional recovery, and length of hospital stay. In addition, we wanted to compare the effect of calcitonin with placebo on fusion of hip fractures treated with internal fixation using a screw or a nail. In a randomized, double-blind, clinically controlled trial, 260 independently living patients (aged 65 years or older) with acute hip fracture were randomly assigned to intranasal calcitonin 200 IU daily for 3 months or matching placebo nasal spray. Analyses were completed on an intention-to-treat basis. Three months after the operation, the median intensity of pain in visual analog scale was 0 mm (IQR 0.20) in the calcitonin group and 4 mm (IQR 0.33) in the placebo group (P = 0.15). The mean change in calcaneal bone mineral density from baseline to 3 months was not statistically significant between the groups -0.004 (95% CI -0.008 to -0.001) in the calcitonin group and -0.007 (95% CI -0.012 to -0.003) in the placebo group (P = 0.28). There were no significant differences in mortality, side effects, length of hospital stay, and functional recovery. Among patients with internal fixation using a screw or a nail (n = 99), fusion of the fracture was observed in an X-ray 3 months after the operation in 84% in the calcitonin group and in 63% in the placebo group (P = 0.029, difference 20% [95% CI 2 to 39]). We conclude that intranasal calcitonin might be useful for hip fracture patients but the clinical significance of this finding needs to be confirmed by studies with more participants, a longer treatment period, a longer follow-up, and perhaps a higher dose of calcitonin.