Search

Background: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), persistent inflammation and increasing disease activity are associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs).Objectives: To assess relationships between RA disease activity and AEs of interest in patients treated with tofacitinib or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).Design: This was a post hoc analysis of a long-term, postauthorization safety endpoint trial of tofacitinib versus TNFi.Methods: In ORAL Surveillance, 4362 patients aged >= 50 years with active RA despite methotrexate, and >= 1 additional cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, were randomized 1:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or TNFi for up to 72 months. Post hoc time-dependent multivariable Cox analysis evaluated the relationships between disease activity [Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)], inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP)], and AEs of interest. The AEs included major adverse CV events (MACE), malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious infections, herpes zoster (HZ), nonserious infections excluding HZ (NSI), and death.Results: Across treatments, risk for NSI was higher when patients had CDAI-defined active disease versus remission; MACE and VTE risks trended higher, but did not reach significance. Hazard ratios for MACE, malignancies excluding NMSC, VTE, infections, and death rose by 2-9% for each 5-mg/L increment in serum CRP. The interaction terms evaluating the impact of treatment assignment on the relationship between disease activity and AEs were all p > 0.05.Conclusion: In ORAL Surveillance, higher NSI risk was observed in the presence of active RA versus remission. The risk of MACE and VTE directionally increased in active disease versus remission, although statistical power was limited due to small event numbers in these categories. The relationship between active disease and AEs was not impacted by treatment with tofacitinib versus TNFi.

Targeted therapies, including biologic DMARDs and Janus kinase inhibitors, can interfere with the mechanisms of pathological bone metabolism in inflammatory arthritis. In this Review, the authors discuss the effects of these therapies on local and generalized bone changes. Generalized bone loss (osteoporosis) and fragility fractures can occur in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis (SpA; including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis). In addition, rheumatoid arthritis can involve localized, periarticular bone erosion and, in SpA, local (pathological) bone formation can occur. The RANK-RANKL-osteoprotegerin axis and the Wnt-beta-catenin signalling pathway (along with its inhibitors sclerostin and Dickkopf 1) have been implicated in inflammatory bone loss and formation, respectively. Targeted therapies including biologic DMARDs and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors can stabilize bone turnover and inhibit radiographic joint damage, and potentially also prevent generalized bone loss. Targeted therapies interfere at various points in the mechanisms of local and generalized bone changes in systemic rheumatic diseases, and they effect biomarkers of bone resorption and formation, bone mass and risk of fragility fractures. Studies on the effects of targeted therapies on rates of fragility fracture are scarce. The efficacy of biologic DMARDs for arresting bone formation in axial SpA is debated. Improved understanding of the most relevant therapeutic targets and identification of important targeted therapies could lead to the preservation of bone in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for cardiovascular risk (CVR) management in gout, vasculitis, systemic sclerosis (SSc), myositis, mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: Following European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) standardised procedures, a multidisciplinary task force formulated recommendations for CVR prediction and management based on systematic literature reviews and expert opinion. RESULTS: Four overarching principles emphasising the need of regular screening and management of modifiable CVR factors and patient education were endorsed. Nineteen recommendations (eleven for gout, vasculitis, SSc, MCTD, myositis, SS; eight for SLE, APS) were developed covering three topics: (1) CVR prediction tools; (2) interventions on traditional CVR factors and (3) interventions on disease-related CVR factors. Several statements relied on expert opinion because high-quality evidence was lacking. Use of generic CVR prediction tools is recommended due to lack of validated rheumatic diseases-specific tools. Diuretics should be avoided in gout and beta-blockers in SSc, and a blood pressure target <130/80 mm Hg should be considered in SLE. Lipid management should follow general population guidelines, and antiplatelet use in SLE, APS and large-vessel vasculitis should follow prior EULAR recommendations. A serum uric acid level <0.36 mmol/L (<6 mg/dL) in gout, and disease activity control and glucocorticoid dose minimisation in SLE and vasculitis, are recommended. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in SLE because it may also reduce CVR, while no particular immunosuppressive treatment in SLE or urate-lowering therapy in gout has been associated with CVR lowering. CONCLUSION: These recommendations can guide clinical practice and future research for improving CVR management in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.