Search

Your search keyword '"Szacilo, Julia"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "Szacilo, Julia"
5 results on '"Szacilo, Julia"'

1. Development of the PSYCHS: Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS

Author

Woods, Scott W., Parker, Sophie, Kerr, Melissa J., Walsh, Barbara C., Wijtenburg, S. Andrea, Prunier, Nicholas, Nunez, Angela R., Buccilli, Kate, Mourgues-Codern, Catalina, Brummitt, Kali, Kinney, Kyle S., Trankler, Carli, Szacilo, Julia, Colton, Beau-Luke, Ali, Munaza, Haidar, Anastasia, Billah, Tashrif, Huynh, Kevin, Ahmed, Uzair, Adery, Laura L., Marcy, Patricia J., Allott, Kelly, Amminger, Paul, Arango, Celso, Broome, Matthew R., Cadenhead, Kristin S., Chen, Eric Y. H., Choi, Jimmy, Conus, Philippe, Cornblatt, Barbara A., Glenthøj, Louise Birkedal, Horton, Leslie E., Kambeitz, Joseph, Kapur, Tina, Keshavan, Matcheri S., Koutsouleris, Nikolaos, Langbein, Kerstin, Lavoie, Suzie, Diaz-Caneja, Covadonga Martinez, Mathalon, Daniel H., Mittal, Vijay A., Nordentoft, Merete, Pasternak, Ofer, Pearlson, Godfrey D., Gaspar, Pablo A., Shah, Jai L., Smesny, Stefan, Stone, William S., Strauss, Gregory P., Wang, Jijun, Corcoran, Cheryl M., Perkins, Diana O., Schiffman, Jason, Perez, Jesus, Mamah, Daniel, Ellman, Lauren M., Powers III, Albert R., Coleman, Michael J., Anticevic, Alan, Fusar-Poli, Paolo, Kane, John M., Kahn, Rene S., McGorry, Patrick D., Bearden, Carrie E., Shenton, Martha E., Nelson, Barnaby, Calkins, Monica E., Hendricks, Larry, Bouix, Sylvain, Addington, Jean, McGlashan, Thomas H., Yung, Alison R., Woods, Scott W., Parker, Sophie, Kerr, Melissa J., Walsh, Barbara C., Wijtenburg, S. Andrea, Prunier, Nicholas, Nunez, Angela R., Buccilli, Kate, Mourgues-Codern, Catalina, Brummitt, Kali, Kinney, Kyle S., Trankler, Carli, Szacilo, Julia, Colton, Beau-Luke, Ali, Munaza, Haidar, Anastasia, Billah, Tashrif, Huynh, Kevin, Ahmed, Uzair, Adery, Laura L., Marcy, Patricia J., Allott, Kelly, Amminger, Paul, Arango, Celso, Broome, Matthew R., Cadenhead, Kristin S., Chen, Eric Y. H., Choi, Jimmy, Conus, Philippe, Cornblatt, Barbara A., Glenthøj, Louise Birkedal, Horton, Leslie E., Kambeitz, Joseph, Kapur, Tina, Keshavan, Matcheri S., Koutsouleris, Nikolaos, Langbein, Kerstin, Lavoie, Suzie, Diaz-Caneja, Covadonga Martinez, Mathalon, Daniel H., Mittal, Vijay A., Nordentoft, Merete, Pasternak, Ofer, Pearlson, Godfrey D., Gaspar, Pablo A., Shah, Jai L., Smesny, Stefan, Stone, William S., Strauss, Gregory P., Wang, Jijun, Corcoran, Cheryl M., Perkins, Diana O., Schiffman, Jason, Perez, Jesus, Mamah, Daniel, Ellman, Lauren M., Powers III, Albert R., Coleman, Michael J., Anticevic, Alan, Fusar-Poli, Paolo, Kane, John M., Kahn, Rene S., McGorry, Patrick D., Bearden, Carrie E., Shenton, Martha E., Nelson, Barnaby, Calkins, Monica E., Hendricks, Larry, Bouix, Sylvain, Addington, Jean, McGlashan, Thomas H., and Yung, Alison R.

Abstract

Aim To harmonize two ascertainment and severity rating instruments commonly used for the clinical high risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P): the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). Methods The initial workshop is described in the companion report from Addington et al. After the workshop, lead experts for each instrument continued harmonizing attenuated positive symptoms and criteria for psychosis and CHR-P through an intensive series of joint videoconferences. Results Full harmonization was achieved for attenuated positive symptom ratings and psychosis criteria, and modest harmonization for CHR-P criteria. The semi-structured interview, named Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS (PSYCHS), generates CHR-P criteria and severity scores for both CAARMS and SIPS. Conclusions Using the PSYCHS for CHR-P ascertainment, conversion determination, and attenuated positive symptom severity rating will help in comparing findings across studies and in meta-analyses.

Published
2024

2. Development of the PSYCHS:Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS

Author

Woods, Scott W., Parker, Sophie, Kerr, Melissa J., Walsh, Barbara C., Wijtenburg, S. Andrea, Prunier, Nicholas, Nunez, Angela R., Buccilli, Kate, Mourgues-Codern, Catalina, Brummitt, Kali, Kinney, Kyle S., Trankler, Carli, Szacilo, Julia, Colton, Beau Luke, Ali, Munaza, Haidar, Anastasia, Billah, Tashrif, Huynh, Kevin, Ahmed, Uzair, Adery, Laura L., Marcy, Patricia J., Allott, Kelly, Amminger, Paul, Arango, Celso, Broome, Matthew R., Cadenhead, Kristin S., Chen, Eric Y. H., Choi, Jimmy, Conus, Philippe, Cornblatt, Barbara A., Glenthøj, Louise Birkedal, Horton, Leslie E., Kambeitz, Joseph, Kapur, Tina, Keshavan, Matcheri S., Koutsouleris, Nikolaos, Langbein, Kerstin, Lavoie, Suzie, Diaz-Caneja, Covadonga Martinez, Mathalon, Daniel H, Mittal, Vijay A., Nordentoft, Merete, Pasternak, Ofer, Pearlson, Godfrey D, Gaspar, Pablo A., Shah, Jai L., Smesny, Stefan, Stone, William S., Strauss, Gregory P., Wang, Jijun, Corcoran, Cheryl M., Perkins, Diana O., Schiffman, Jason, Perez, Jesus, Mamah, Daniel, Ellman, Lauren M., Powers, Albert R., Coleman, Michael J., Anticevic, Alan, Fusar-Poli, Paolo, Kane, John M., Kahn, Rene S., McGorry, Patrick D., Bearden, Carrie E, Shenton, Martha E., Nelson, Barnaby, Calkins, Monica E., Hendricks, Larry, Bouix, Sylvain, Addington, Jean, McGlashan, Thomas H, Yung, Alison R., Woods, Scott W., Parker, Sophie, Kerr, Melissa J., Walsh, Barbara C., Wijtenburg, S. Andrea, Prunier, Nicholas, Nunez, Angela R., Buccilli, Kate, Mourgues-Codern, Catalina, Brummitt, Kali, Kinney, Kyle S., Trankler, Carli, Szacilo, Julia, Colton, Beau Luke, Ali, Munaza, Haidar, Anastasia, Billah, Tashrif, Huynh, Kevin, Ahmed, Uzair, Adery, Laura L., Marcy, Patricia J., Allott, Kelly, Amminger, Paul, Arango, Celso, Broome, Matthew R., Cadenhead, Kristin S., Chen, Eric Y. H., Choi, Jimmy, Conus, Philippe, Cornblatt, Barbara A., Glenthøj, Louise Birkedal, Horton, Leslie E., Kambeitz, Joseph, Kapur, Tina, Keshavan, Matcheri S., Koutsouleris, Nikolaos, Langbein, Kerstin, Lavoie, Suzie, Diaz-Caneja, Covadonga Martinez, Mathalon, Daniel H, Mittal, Vijay A., Nordentoft, Merete, Pasternak, Ofer, Pearlson, Godfrey D, Gaspar, Pablo A., Shah, Jai L., Smesny, Stefan, Stone, William S., Strauss, Gregory P., Wang, Jijun, Corcoran, Cheryl M., Perkins, Diana O., Schiffman, Jason, Perez, Jesus, Mamah, Daniel, Ellman, Lauren M., Powers, Albert R., Coleman, Michael J., Anticevic, Alan, Fusar-Poli, Paolo, Kane, John M., Kahn, Rene S., McGorry, Patrick D., Bearden, Carrie E, Shenton, Martha E., Nelson, Barnaby, Calkins, Monica E., Hendricks, Larry, Bouix, Sylvain, Addington, Jean, McGlashan, Thomas H, and Yung, Alison R.

Abstract

Aim: To harmonize two ascertainment and severity rating instruments commonly used for the clinical high risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P): the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). Methods: The initial workshop is described in the companion report from Addington et al. After the workshop, lead experts for each instrument continued harmonizing attenuated positive symptoms and criteria for psychosis and CHR-P through an intensive series of joint videoconferences. Results: Full harmonization was achieved for attenuated positive symptom ratings and psychosis criteria, and modest harmonization for CHR-P criteria. The semi-structured interview, named Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS (PSYCHS), generates CHR-P criteria and severity scores for both CAARMS and SIPS. Conclusions: Using the PSYCHS for CHR-P ascertainment, conversion determination, and attenuated positive symptom severity rating will help in comparing findings across studies and in meta-analyses.

Published
2024

3. Development of the PSYCHS: Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS

Author

Woods, Scott W., Parker, Sophie, Kerr, Melissa J., Walsh, Barbara C., Wijtenburg, S. Andrea, Prunier, Nicholas, Nunez, Angela R., Buccilli, Kate, Mourgues-Codern, Catalina, Brummitt, Kali, Kinney, Kyle S., Trankler, Carli, Szacilo, Julia, Colton, Beau-Luke, Ali, Munaza, Haidar, Anastasia, Billah, Tashrif, Huynh, Kevin, Ahmed, Uzair, Adery, Laura L., Corcoran, Cheryl M., Perkins, Diana O., Schiffman, Jason, Perez, Jesus, Mamah, Daniel, Ellman, Lauren M., Powers, Albert R., Coleman, Michael J., Anticevic, Alan, Fusar-Poli, Paolo, Kane, John M., Kahn, Rene S., McGorry, Patrick D., Bearden, Carrie E., Shenton, Martha E., Nelson, Barnaby, Calkins, Monica E., Hendricks, Larry, Bouix, Sylvain, Addington, Jean, McGlashan, Thomas H., Yung, Alison R., Allott, Kelly, Clark, Scott R., Kapur, Tina, Lavoie, S., Lewandowski, Kathryn E., Mathalon, Daniel H., Pasternak, Ofer, Stone, William S., Torous, John, Rowland, Laura M., Zhan, Ming, Amminger, Paul, Arango, Celso, Broome, Matthew R., Cadenhead, Kristin S., Chen, Eric Y.H., Choi, Jimmy, Kevin Cho, Kang Ik, Conus, Philippe, Cornblatt, Barbara A., Glenthøj, Louise Birkedal, Horton, Leslie E., Kambeitz, Joseph, Keshavan, Matcheri S., Koutsouleris, Nikolaos, Langbein, Kerstin, Diaz-Caneja, Covadonga Martinez, Mittal, Vijay A., Nordentoft, Merete, Gaspar Ramos, Pablo A., Pearlson, Godfrey D., Shah, Jai L., Smesny, Stefan, Strauss, Gregory P., Wang, Jijun, Marcy, Patricia J., Matneja, Priya, Phassouliotis, Christina, Ray, Susan, Snowball, Collum, Spark, Jessica, and Tod, Sophie

Subjects
Article
Abstract

AIM: To harmonize two ascertainment and severity rating instruments commonly used for the clinical high risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P): the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). METHODS: The initial workshop is described in the companion report from Addington et al. After the workshop, lead experts for each instrument continued harmonizing attenuated positive symptoms and criteria for psychosis and CHR-P through an intensive series of joint videoconferences. RESULTS: Full harmonization was achieved for attenuated positive symptom ratings and psychosis criteria, and partial harmonization for CHR-P criteria. The semi-structured interview, named P ositive SY mptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the C AARMS H armonized with the S IPS (PSYCHS), generates CHR-P criteria and severity scores for both CAARMS and SIPS. CONCLUSION: Using the PSYCHS for CHR-P ascertainment, conversion determination, and attenuated positive symptom severity rating will help in comparing findings across studies and in meta-analyses.

Published
2023

4. Development of the PSYCHS: Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS.

Author

Woods SW, Parker S, Kerr MJ, Walsh BC, Wijtenburg SA, Prunier N, Nunez AR, Buccilli K, Mourgues-Codern C, Brummitt K, Kinney KS, Trankler C, Szacilo J, Colton BL, Ali M, Haidar A, Billah T, Huynh K, Ahmed U, Adery LL, Marcy PJ, Allott K, Amminger P, Arango C, Broome MR, Cadenhead KS, Chen EYH, Choi J, Conus P, Cornblatt BA, Glenthøj LB, Horton LE, Kambeitz J, Kapur T, Keshavan MS, Koutsouleris N, Langbein K, Lavoie S, Diaz-Caneja CM, Mathalon DH, Mittal VA, Nordentoft M, Pasternak O, Pearlson GD, Gaspar PA, Shah JL, Smesny S, Stone WS, Strauss GP, Wang J, Corcoran CM, Perkins DO, Schiffman J, Perez J, Mamah D, Ellman LM, Powers AR 3rd, Coleman MJ, Anticevic A, Fusar-Poli P, Kane JM, Kahn RS, McGorry PD, Bearden CE, Shenton ME, Nelson B, Calkins ME, Hendricks L, Bouix S, Addington J, McGlashan TH, and Yung AR

Subjects
Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Prodromal Symptoms, Psychotic Disorders diagnosis
Abstract

Aim: To harmonize two ascertainment and severity rating instruments commonly used for the clinical high risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P): the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS)., Methods: The initial workshop is described in the companion report from Addington et al. After the workshop, lead experts for each instrument continued harmonizing attenuated positive symptoms and criteria for psychosis and CHR-P through an intensive series of joint videoconferences., Results: Full harmonization was achieved for attenuated positive symptom ratings and psychosis criteria, and modest harmonization for CHR-P criteria. The semi-structured interview, named Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS (PSYCHS), generates CHR-P criteria and severity scores for both CAARMS and SIPS., Conclusions: Using the PSYCHS for CHR-P ascertainment, conversion determination, and attenuated positive symptom severity rating will help in comparing findings across studies and in meta-analyses., (© 2023 The Authors. Early Intervention in Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Development of the PSYCHS: Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS.

Author

Woods SW, Parker S, Kerr MJ, Walsh BC, Wijtenburg SA, Prunier N, Nunez AR, Buccilli K, Mourgues-Codern C, Brummitt K, Kinney KS, Trankler C, Szacilo J, Colton BL, Ali M, Haidar A, Billah T, Huynh K, Ahmed U, Adery LL, Corcoran CM, Perkins DO, Schiffman J, Perez J, Mamah D, Ellman LM, Powers AR 3rd, Coleman MJ, Anticevic A, Fusar-Poli P, Kane JM, Kahn RS, McGorry PD, Bearden CE, Shenton ME, Nelson B, Calkins ME, Hendricks L, Bouix S, Addington J, McGlashan TH, and Yung AR

Abstract

Aim: To harmonize two ascertainment and severity rating instruments commonly used for the clinical high risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P): the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS)., Methods: The initial workshop is described in the companion report from Addington et al. After the workshop, lead experts for each instrument continued harmonizing attenuated positive symptoms and criteria for psychosis and CHR-P through an intensive series of joint videoconferences., Results: Full harmonization was achieved for attenuated positive symptom ratings and psychosis criteria, and partial harmonization for CHR-P criteria. The semi-structured interview, named P ositive SY mptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the C AARMS H armonized with the S IPS (PSYCHS), generates CHR-P criteria and severity scores for both CAARMS and SIPS., Conclusion: Using the PSYCHS for CHR-P ascertainment, conversion determination, and attenuated positive symptom severity rating will help in comparing findings across studies and in meta-analyses.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results