Propionate is an important intermediate in the conversion of organic matter to methane and carbon dioxide. In methanogenic environments, the degradation of propionate to acetate and CO2 may account for 6 to 35 mol% of the total methanogenesis (17). Propionate oxidation itself is energetically very unfavorable under standard thermodynamic conditions (see Table Table1).1). Under methanogenic conditions, proton-reducing acetogenic bacteria are only able to gain energy from this reaction when the concentration of products is kept low. Thus, the degradation of propionate is only accomplished in obligate syntrophic consortia of proton-reducing acetogenic bacteria and methanogenic archaea (27, 28, 33). So far, three syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria and some highly purified enrichment cultures have been described (3, 11, 20, 21, 22, 32, 43, 44, 49). TABLE 1 Reactions involved in the degradation of propionate and their standard Gibbs free-energy changes, corrected for a pH of 6.9 and a temperature of 37°Ca Studies have shown that most of the known syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria degrade propionate via the methylmalonyl-coenzyme A (CoA) pathway (14, 25, 43). During the oxidation of propionate in the methylmalonyl-CoA pathway, electrons are released in three reactions, namely, the oxidation of succinate to fumarate, malate to oxaloacetate, and pyruvate to acetyl-CoA (25). In methanogenic environments, the H2 partial pressure is low enough to allow the direct reduction of protons with the electrons released during the oxidation of pyruvate and malate. However, the H2 partial pressure is not sufficient to allow this reduction during the oxidation of succinate to fumarate. It was hypothesized that the electrons released during the oxidation of succinate are shifted to a lower redox potential via reversed electron transport. This transport would be driven by the hydrolysis of 2/3 mol of ATP (27, 28, 37). Some evidence has been obtained for the presence of a reversed electron transport system in syntrophic propionate-degrading bacteria (41). However, the methylmalonyl-CoA pathway yields only 1 mol of ATP via substrate level phosphorylation. Therefore, if such a reversed electron transport is occurring, only 1/3 mol of ATP per mol of propionate is left for growth. Under physiological conditions, the Gibbs free-energy change needed for ATP synthesis must amount to a minimum of 70 kJ mol of ATP−1. Thus, the minimum Gibbs free-energy quantum that can generate 1/3 mol of ATP would amount to approximately −23 kJ mol of propionate−1. It has been suggested that this amount of Gibbs free-energy change corresponds to the minimum energy quantum required to sustain microbial life (27, 28). In several methanogenic environments, the apparent Gibbs free-energy change for propionate oxidation was on the order of −3 to −15 kJ mol of propionate−1 and thus was rather small (5, 19, 26, 46). This amount of free-energy change is less than the minimum energy quantum needed to sustain microbial life. It is not clear why such small free-energy changes are observed during the degradation of propionate. Most syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria are not obligate syntrophs but are also able to grow on other substrates, such as fumarate, malate, and pyruvate, in the absence of a partner microorganism. A remarkable feature of the propionate-oxidizing Syntrophobacter species is their ability to couple the oxidation of propionate not only to an H2-consuming syntrophic partner but also to the reduction of sulfate. In fact, phylogenetic analysis of Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans has revealed that this bacterium is indeed related to sulfate-reducing bacteria (12). Perhaps the ability to reduce sulfate is of importance to explain the energetics of syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria. Besides propionate, many alcohols, fatty acids, amino acids, and aromatic compounds are anaerobically degraded by syntrophy. In each case, the available free energy is relatively low and has to be shared between the two syntrophic partners (27, 28). The energetics of syntrophic interspecies H2 transfer has been studied in defined cocultures of benzoate-, lactate-, ethanol-, propionate-, and butyrate-oxidizing fermenting bacteria with H2-consuming methanogens (1, 8, 9, 30, 31, 28, 39, 45). Propionate oxidation, however, has not yet been investigated in continuous-culture experiments. Therefore, we studied the energetics of propionate consumption in syntrophic cocultures of S. fumaroxidans and Methanospirillum hungatei in the absence and presence of sulfate by determining the Gibbs free energy available for both the propionate oxidizers and the H2-consuming methanogens under steady-state conditions in batch and chemostat cultures. The growth yields and maintenance coefficients of the syntrophic propionate oxidizer were also determined.