Search

Iron overload is a common complication experienced by transfusion-dependent children with hemoglobin disorders. Chelators such as deferasirox (DFX) and deferiprone (DFP) are effective in overcoming this problem. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of DFX compared to DFP in treating iron overload amongst pediatric patients with hemoglobin disorders.PubMed and Cochrane Central were searched from their inception until Dec 21 2021, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies, which assessed the efficacy of DFX compared to DFP in the treatment of inherited hemoglobin disorders. The outcomes of interest included myocardial iron concentration (MRI T2*) at the end of the trial and change in mean serum ferritin (SF) levels at the 6 and 12 months mark. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes using random effects model.A total of 5 studies comprising 607 children were included. The results of our analysis revealed no significant difference between DFX and DFP in MRI T2* at the end of treatment (WMD: -0.92; 95% CI [-3.35, 1.52]; p = 0.46; IOur analysis shows no significant difference between the efficacy of DFX and DFP in the management of iron overload in children with inherited blood disorders. Future large-scale clinical trials are required to further validate our results.

Alopecia Areata (AA) is found to be the most prevalent autoimmune disorder amongst the general population. It was observed that AA patients are at a significantly higher risk of developing obstructive sleep apnea and non-apneic insomnia than patients without AA. On the contrary, patients with identified sleep disorders were found to be more prone to developing AA as compared to the patients without sleep disorders. This study, therefore, validated the hypothesis of a bidirectional association between AA and sleep disorders.In this systematic review, our primary aim is to assess the prevalence of sleep disorders in Alopecia Areata patients while also assessing the inverse relationship between the two disorders.A literature search of MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed from their inception to April 2022. Articles were selected for inclusion if they met the following eligibility criteria: (a) Studies enrolling patients having alopecia areata to assess the sleep quality. (b) Studies assessing the risks of alopecia areata in individuals with sleep disorder (c) Studies evaluating the bidirectional association between alopecia areata and sleep quality. Case reports, commentaries, and editorials were excluded. The outcomes of recruited studies were qualitatively synthesised and study findings are summarized in the results section and tabulated in summary tables.Our search on electronic databases yielded 1562 articles. After abstract screening and full text review, 5 cross sectional and 3 cohort studies are included in this systematic review. Cases with PSQI scores higher than 5 and 6 were found to be in greater numbers amongst the AA patient population when compared to the control population (The findings from our results display a significant bi-directional cause-effect relation between AA and sleep disorders. However, more large-scale observational studies on this subject are required to further validate our findings.

Madam, preterm birth (PTB) is classified as having a gestational age of fewer than 37 weeks; annually, approximately 15 million infants are born preterm worldwide(1). Major risk factors of PTB include placenta previa, fetal distress, maternal thyroid disease, and maternal asthma(2). Both teenage (35 years) mothers carry an increased risk of giving birth prematurely(2). Previous studies have shown a positive correlation between PTB and numerous disorders, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia(3). Mounting evidence suggests PTB is a significant risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke. However, due to prior discrepant findings, there is a possibility that these associations might be spurious. However, recent literature surfaced two cohorts by Crump et al. in 2019(4) and 2021(3). In 2019, compiled data from 2,141,709 participants over 43 years, and preterm babies were found to have a significantly higher risk of developing IHD in the future (aHR: 1.44 [1.19-1.73](4). Moreover, the incidence of IHD was more prevalent among preterm-born men than preterm-born women(4). The 2021 cohort evaluated the frequency of stroke with PTB. It concluded that PTB was associated with higher risks of both hemorrhagic stroke (aHR: 1.15 [0.97–1.35]) and ischemic stroke (aHR: 1.31 [1.07–1.60]), compared with full-term birth(3). These results are worrisome for Pakistan since it has a high tally of PTB cases, as highlighted by a 2017 study by Hanif et al., which showed a 21.64% prevalence of PTB among 1691 females(2). These preterm infants have an increased likelihood of acquiring IHD and Stroke coupled with the already established diseases including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia later in life, which exacerbates the already high disease burden in Pakistan. Moreover, unaware of the medicines’ cost-effectiveness, medical practitioners commonly prescribe expensive popular generics for treating IHD(5), which inflicts a substantial financial burden on these patients. Hence, paediatricians should be advised to follow up with preterm babies regularly assess their progress, educate mothers about the risk factors of PTB and minimize the chances of them showing up down the line by emphasizing proper diet, regular exercise, and abstinence from smoking. Nationwide campaigns and awareness drives are a few ways the general population could be made aware of PTB and its threat to the health of these children in the future. Continue...

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), characterized by chronic inflammation and accumulation of fat in liver tissue. Affecting estimated 35 million people globally, NASH is the most common chronic liver condition in Western populations, and with patient numbers growing rapidly, the market for NASH therapy is projected to rise to $27.2 B in 2029. Despite this clinical need and attractive commercial opportunity, there are no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies specifically for this disease. Many have tried and unfortunately failed to find a drug, or drug combination, capable of unravelling the complexities of this metabolic condition. At the time of writing this review, only Zydus Cadila’s new drug application for Saroglitazar had been approved (2020) for NASH therapy in India. However, it is hoped that this dearth of therapy options will improve as several drug candidates progress through late-stage clinical development. Obeticholic acid (Intercept Pharmaceuticals), Cenicriviroc (Allergan), Aramchol (Galmed Pharmaceuticals), Resmetirom (Madrigal Pharmaceuticals), Dapagliflozin and Semaglutide (Novo Nordisk) are in advanced Phase 3 clinical trials, while Belapectin (Galectin Therapeutics), MSDC-0602K (Cirius Therapeutics), Lanifibranor (Inventiva), Efruxifermin (Akero) and Tesamorelin (Theratechnologies) are expected to start Phase 3 trials soon. Here, we have performed an exhaustive review of the current therapeutic landscape for this disease and compared, in some detail, the fortunes of different drug classes (biologics vs small molecules) and target molecules. Given the complex pathophysiology of NASH, the use of drug combination, different mechanisms of actions and the targeting of each stage of the disease will likely be required. Hence, the development of a single therapy for NASH seems challenging and unlikely, despite the plethora of later stage trials due to report. We therefore predict that clinical, patient and company interest in pipeline and next-generation therapies will remain high for some time to come.

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. There is no universally accepted effective treatment for NAFLD. Although various studies propose statins effective in lowering liver enzymes and in improving liver histology, their potency in the treatment and development of NAFLD remains unknown.We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of statins in the treatment and the development of NAFLD.Electronic databases (MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from their inception until May 2021 for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of statins for the treatment of NAFLD and its development. Studies were included irrespective of the dosage or duration, and their risk of bias was assessed. The outcomes of interest for our study were the effect of statins on liver histology (steatosis, fibrosis and necroinflammation, NAFLD activity score [NAS]) and liver enzymes (Alanine transaminase [ALT], Aspartate transaminase [AST], and Gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT] levels). To pool continuous outcomes, a random-effects model was used to derive weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Generic inverse variance was then used for different measurement units reported by the studies. For studies investigating the effects of statins on the development of NAFLD, generic inverse variance along with random effects model was used to derive odds ratio (ORs) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).A total of 14 studies including 1,247,503 participants were short-listed for our analysis. All the studies included in our analysis had a low to moderate risk of bias. The results of our analysis suggest that statins may significantly reduce the risk of developing NAFLD (OR:0.69, 95% CI [0.57,0.84]; p = 0.0002; I² =36%). Statin use significantly reduced ALT levels (WMD: -27.28, 95% CI [-43.06, -11.51]; p = 0.0007; I² =90%), AST levels (WMD: -10.99, 95% CI [-18.17, -3.81]; p = 0.003; I² =79%) and GGT levels (WMD: -23.40, 95% CI [-31.82, -14.98]; p 0.00001; I² = 21%) in patients presenting with NAFLD at baseline. In liver histology outcomes, steatosis grade (SMD: -2.59, 95% CI [-4.61, -0.56]; p = 0.01; I² = 95%), NAS (WMD: -1.03, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.74]; p 0.00001; I² = 33%), necro-inflammatory stage (WMD: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.26, -0.13]; p 0.00001; I² = 0%) and significant fibrosis (OR:0.20, 95% CI [0.04, 0.95]; p = 0.04; I² = 97%) underwent notable reduction. However, fibrosis stage outcome (WMD: 0.07, 95% CI [-0.05, 0.20]; p = 0.27; I² = 0%) was non-significant.There was a significant decrease in transaminase and transferase levels. Marked improvement in liver histology of NAFLD patients was observed. Statin use also remarkably reduced the risk of developing NAFLD. Future large-scale trials can further aid in identifying the positive impact of statins in treatment for NAFLD and those at risk of developing it.

The acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has spread across the world, resulting in a pandemic COVID-19 which is a human zoonotic disease that is caused by a novel coronavirus (CoV) strain thought to have originated in wild or captive bats in the initial COVID outbreak region. The global COVID-19 outbreak started in Guangdong Province, China’s southernmost province. The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been hampered by the sheer number of infected people, many of whom need intensive care before succumbing to the disease. The epidemic is being handled by a combination of disease control by public health interventions and compassionate treatment for those who have been impacted. There is no clear anti-COVID-19 medication available at this time. However, the need to find medications that can turn the tide has led to the development of a number of investigational drugs as potential candidates for improving outcomes, especially in the severely and critically ill. Although many of these adjunctive medications are still being studied in clinical trials, professional organizations have attempted to define the circumstances in which their use is deemed off-label or compassionate. It is important to remind readers that new information about COVID-19’s clinical features, treatment options, and outcomes is released on a regular basis. The mainstay of treatment remains optimized supportive care, and the therapeutic effectiveness of the subsequent agents is still being studied., Graphical Abstract