Search

127 Background: Access to care is often a challenge for healthcare organizations – especially as pressures on time increase and workforce availability decreases – and is often complex to solve. In this quality improvement (QI) initiative, a team from a rural academic medical center deployed the Lean Six Sigma approach to develop a two-pronged method that reduced the median time to first visit for new melanoma patients. Methods: The project team deployed the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) processes to address access for melanoma patients after the healthcare organization set a goal that 55% of new specialty care patients be seen within 10 days. Define: Concern was raised by the melanoma clinical care team that the lack of a well-defined and standardized referral workflow for melanoma patients could delay patient care. Measure: Data from the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated that only 31% of incoming referrals were seen within 10 days, and the median number of days to first visit was 15, or 50% over the organizational standard. Analyze: Analysis found considerable waste in the existing referral system. First, untrained staff made referral and routing decisions, meaning patients could potentially be seen by inappropriate departments based on the assessment of those not specialized in melanoma care and treatment. This led to the second area of waste: rework. Every referral had to be reviewed by multiple staff in several departments to ensure the referral made was appropriate based on the characteristics of disease. This was a very labor-intensive processes that allowed too many patients to “slip through the cracks” of the system. Improve: Two interventions were deployed to address the identified waste. First, a centralized referral point for all melanomas monitored by the Program Coordinator. Second, a referral questionnaire developed by an interdisciplinary team to guide where routine cases should be referred. Early results show that the interventions had marked impact on the time to first appointment for all referrals, whether originating inside of the organization or out. After the intervention 54% of newly referred patients were seen within 10 days. Results: Control: A standard report was built to support the project team in monthly monitoring of the KPI, days from referral to patient seen. The report is monitored by a dedicated Program Coordinator who can escalate any issues during regular interdisciplinary care team meetings. Conclusions: Improvements in access can be achieved by adopting standard work that is targeted to reduce waste in the referral workflow. The model developed by this QI initiative is easily replicable and may be especially useful for interdisciplinary teams who provide care to complex diseases.[Table: see text]

Healing Spaces proposes a new approach to multisensory interventions that show potential in ameliorating the behavioral and psychological symptoms of advanced dementia in older adults. Using smart technology, the project combines both digital and physical components to transform spaces and create unified, curated sensory experiences that provide meaningful context for interaction, and are easy for caregivers to deliver. A usability study was conducted for the Healing Spaces app followed by a feasibility evaluation of the full experience in a memory care facility recruiting caregivers, and residents in advanced stages of dementia. The feasibility evaluation successfully illuminated strengths as well as areas for improvement for the Healing Spaces experience in a memory care setting with older adults with advanced dementia. Caregivers and facility managers expressed interest in continuing to use Healing Spaces with the residents of the facility. Lessons learned about the technical and logistical implementation of Healing Spaces are discussed, as well as future directions for study design and potential therapeutic value of the experience., PETRA 20: Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. June 2020. Article No 24. Pages 1 to 9

Background: Posterior interosseous nerve neurectomies (PINN) are an option in the treatment of chronic dorsal wrist pain. However, the literature describing PINN consists primarily of small case series, and the procedure is typically done as an adjunct treatment; therefore, the outcomes of the PINN itself are not well known. We performed a systematic review of the literature to provide characteristics of patients following a PINN. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Papers published in the PubMed database in English on isolated PINN were included. Articles in which a PINN was performed as an adjunct were excluded. Primary outcomes were return to work, patient satisfaction, pain/function scores, wrist range of motion, complications, and pain recurrence. Weighted averages were used to calculate continuous data, whereas categorical data were noted in percentages. Results: The search yielded 427 articles including 6 studies and 135 patients (136 cases). The average age was 43.6 years (range, 17-75), and most patients were female (54.1%). At an average final follow-up of 51 months, 88.9% of patients were able to return to work. After initial improvement, a recurrence of pain occurred in 25.5% of patients at an average of 12.3 months. Excluding recurrence of pain, the complication rate was 0.9%, including 1 reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Overall, 88.4% of patients experienced a subjective improvement and were satisfied with the procedure. Conclusions: Isolated PINN have shown excellent clinical outcomes, with few patients experiencing recurrent pain at long-term follow-up. PINN can provide relief in patient’s chronic wrist pain.

Background: Triceps tendon ruptures (TTR) are an uncommon injury. The aim of this systematic review was to classify diagnostic signs, report outcomes and rerupture rates, and identify potential predisposing risk factors in all reported cases of surgical treated TTR. Methods: A literature search collecting surgical treated cases of TTR was performed, identifying 175 articles, 40 of which met inclusion criteria, accounting for 262 patients. Data were pooled and analyzed focusing on medical comorbidities, presence of a fleck fracture on the preoperative lateral elbow x-ray film (Dunn-Kusnezov Sign [DKS]), outcomes, and rerupture rates. Results: The average age of injury was 45.6 years. The average time from injury to day of surgery was 24 days while 10 patients had a delay in diagnosis of more than 1 month. Renal disease (10%) and anabolic steroid use (7%) were the 2 most common medical comorbidities. The DKS was present in 61% to 88% of cases on the lateral x-ray film. Postoperatively, 89% of patients returned to preinjury level of activity, and there was a 6% rerupture rate at an average follow-up of 34.6 months. The vast majority (81%) of the patients in this review underwent repair via suture fixation. Conclusions: TTR is an uncommon injury. Risks factors for rupture include renal disease and anabolic steroid use. Lateral elbow radiographs should be scrutinized for the DKS in patients with extension weakness. Outcomes are excellent following repair, and rates of rerupture are low.