Search

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) initiation and its relation to various clinical factors was studied by reviewing intracardiac electrograms from patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Events were divided into (1) sudden onset without preceding ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), (2) extrasystolic onset with VPCs, or (3) paced, depending on the type and morphology of the last 5 beats before initiation of VT. Prematurity index, sinus rate, cycle length, and presence of short-long-short sequence for each episode was noted. A total of 268 episodes of VT among 52 patients were analyzed. Extrasystolic initiation was the most frequent pattern (177; 66%) followed by sudden onset (75; 28%) and paced (16; 6%). Among extrasystolic onset, 99 episodes (56%) were due to multiple VPCs and 149 episodes (84%) had different VPC morphology than the subsequent VT. Among pacing-induced VT, 13 of 16 episodes were due to inappropriate pacing due to undersensing of prior R waves. Sudden-onset episodes were slower (mean cycle length 383+/-97 ms) than extrasystolic (mean cycle length 336+/-88 ms, p = 0.002) and paced (mean cycle length 313+/-85 ms, p = 0.01) onset. Patients in the sudden-onset group had better left ventricular ejection fraction (33+/-15%) than the extrasystolic (29+/-11%, p<0.001) and paced (28+/-14%, p<0.01) groups. Extrasystolic onset with multiple, late coupled VPCs was the most common pattern of VT initiation and was associated with lower ejection fraction. Sudden-onset initiation was more common with better preserved systolic function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Compared with adults patients (n = 309) receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators at the same institution, pediatric patients (n = 11) exhibited a trend toward lower defibrillation thresholds. At follow-up of 29 +/- 17 months, the incidence of recurrent arrhythmias was similar, but lead revisions and device infections were more common in the pediatric patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have become an important therapeutic modality for patients who have had a cardiac arrest or are at risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Clinical trials have confirmed the role of the ICD for patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias and have expanded the indications to include patients with coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and inducible ventricular tachycardia. Numerous technologic advances in ICDs have resulted in decreased size, greater ease of placement, and increased functionality. Important advancements have been made in the effectiveness of arrhythmia classification and electrogram storage. Dual-chamber ICDs have become increasingly sophisticated with rate-adaptive sensors. Biventricular pacing is being combined with ICD function in patients with heart failure, systolic dysfunction, and QRS widening. Future advances in devices will likely lead to improved arrhythmia classification, more advanced automated features, and additional features including more sophisticated sensors and biventricular pacing systems.