Search

Background/Aims: Gait training for patients with lateropulsion after stroke improves outcomes (eg reduced lateropulsion and improved function) but can be burdensome on the physical therapist. This study describes the physical therapist burden and performance of a patient with moderate lateropulsion during three gait training approaches during inpatient rehabilitation. Methods: A physical therapist delivered gait training (one session each of overground robotic exoskeleton, overground supported walking, and body weight-supported treadmill training) for a patient with lateropulsion (scoring 8 out of 17 on the Burke Lateropulsion Scale). Outcomes were physiological burden (heart rate, metabolic equivalents, respiratory exchange ratio and energy expenditure), which were measured via a wearable metabolic system and perceptual burden (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index) on the physical therapist. Patient performance (step count, time walking, time spent upright and time in moderate-to-vigorous intensity) was recorded. Results: During overground robotic exoskeleton gait training, the physical therapist's physiological metrics included an average heart rate of 116 beats per minute (minimum–maximum: 98–127, time in moderate-to-vigorous intensity was 0%), average metabolic equivalents of 3.2 (minimum–maximum: 1.7–4.3), a respiratory exchange ratio of 0.79 (minimum–maximum: 0.70–0.93), an energy expenditure of 228 kcal/hour and a perceptual burden of 33.3. The patient walked 228 steps, spent 15.4 minutes upright, 8.7 minutes walking and achieved 0% in moderate-to-vigorous intensity. During overground supported walking, the physical therapist's metrics included an average heart rate of 145 beats per minute (minimum–maximum: 113–164, time in moderate-to-vigorous intensity was 87%), average metabolic equivalents of 4.7 (minimum–maximum: 2.7–6.0), a respiratory exchange ratio of 0.96 (minimum–maximum: 0.81–1.16), an energy expenditure of 343 kcal/hour and a perceptual burden of 60.8. The patient walked 588 steps, spent 19.6 minutes upright, 10.5 minutes walking and achieved 38% in moderate-to-vigorous intensity. During body weight-supported treadmill training, the physical therapist's metrics included an average heart rate of 112 beats per minute (minimum–maximum: 69–137, time in moderate-to-vigorous intensity was 34%), average metabolic equivalents of 3.9 (minimum–maximum: 3.2–4.4), a respiratory exchange ratio of 0.89 (minimum–maximum: 0.82–0.95), an energy expenditure of 281 kcal/hour and a perceptual burden of 32.5. The patient walked 682 steps, spent 16.0 minutes upright, 10.0 minutes walking and achieved 0% in moderate-to-vigorous intensity. Conclusions: As concordance between physical therapist burden and patient gait performance was low in this study, future efforts to identify gait training approaches that minimise therapist burden while maximising outcomes for the patient with lateropulsion are necessary for the health of both. Implications for practice: Physical therapists may consider advanced technology use such as overground robotic exoskeletons to reduce the burden during the provision of gait training for patients with lateropulsion. Gait training performance of patients with lateropulsion may vary across different gait training approaches with low correspondence to therapist burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To describe the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of overground exoskeleton gait training (OEGT) integrated into clinical practice for patients after severe acquired brain injury (ABI). Inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Eligible patients with severe ABI met the following criteria: age > 18, medically stable, met exoskeleton frame limitations, and a score of ≤ 3 on the motor function portion of the Coma Recovery Scale – Revised (CRS-R). Presence of consciousness disorder was not exclusionary. Prospective observational study. Outcomes examined safety (adverse events), feasibility (session count and barriers to session completion), and tolerability of OEGT (session metrics and heart rate). Ten patients with ABI completed 10.4 ± 4.8 OEGT sessions with no adverse events. Barriers to session completion included clinical focus on prioritized interventions. Sessions [median up time = 17 minutes, (IQR: 7); walk time = 13 minutes, (IQR: 9); step count = 243, (IQR: 161); device assist = 74, (IQR: 28.0)] were primarily spent in Very Light to Light heart rate intensities [89%, (IQR: 42%) and 9%, (IQR: 33%), respectively]. OEGT incorporated into the rehabilitation plan of care during inpatient rehabilitation after severe ABI was observed to be safe, feasible, and tolerable. However, intentional steps must be taken to facilitate patient safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After spinal cord injury (SCI), inpatient rehabilitation begins and continues through outpatient therapy. Overground exoskeleton gait training (OEGT) has been shown to be feasible in both settings, yet its use as an intervention across the continuum has not yet been reported. This study describes OEGT for patients with SCI across the continuum and its effects on clinical outcomes. Medical records of patients with SCI who completed at least one OEGT session during inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II) scores, and OEGT session details (frequency, "walk" time, "up" time, and step count) were extracted. Eighteen patients [male (83%), White (61%), aged 37.4 ± 15 years, with tetraplegia (50%), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A (28%), B (22%), C (39%), D (11%)] completed OEGT sessions (motor complete, 18.2 ± 10.3; motor incomplete, 16.7 ± 7.7) over approximately 18 weeks (motor complete, 15.1 ± 6.4; motor incomplete, 19.0 ± 8.2). Patients demonstrated improved OEGT session tolerance on device metrics including "walk" time (motor complete, 7:51 ± 4:42 to 24:50 ± 9:35 minutes; motor incomplete, 12:16 ± 6:01 to 20:01 ± 08:05 minutes), "up" time (motor complete, 16:03 ± 7:41 to 29:49 ± 12:44 minutes; motor incomplete, 16:38 ± 4:51 to 23:06 ± 08:50 minutes), and step count (motor complete, 340 ± 295.9 to 840.2 ± 379.4; motor incomplete, 372.3 ± 225.2 to 713.2 ± 272). Across therapy settings, patients with motor complete SCI experienced improvement in WISCI-II scores from 0 ± 0 at inpatient admission to 3 ± 4.6 by outpatient discharge, whereas the motor incomplete group demonstrated a change of 0.2 ± 0.4 to 9.0 ± 6.4. Patients completed OEGT across the therapy continuum. Patients with motor incomplete SCI experienced clinically meaningful improvements in walking function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Obesity after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a public health issue and no evidence-based weight loss interventions exist to meet the unique needs of individuals after TBI. Purpose To (a) examine the efficacy of the Diabetes Prevention Program Group Lifestyle Balance for TBI (GLB-TBI) weight-loss intervention compared to an attention control for primary (weight-loss) and secondary health outcomes; (b) determine participant compliance with the GLB-TBI; and (c) determine if compliance is associated with improved outcomes. Methods Individuals with moderate to severe TBI, age 18–64 years, ≥6 months postinjury, and body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 were randomized to a 12-month, 22-session GLB-TBI intervention or attention control condition. Weight-loss (lbs.), anthropometric, biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results The GLB-TBI group (n = 27) lost 17.8 ± 41.4lbs (7.9%) over the 12-month program and the attention control group (n = 27) lost 0 ± 55.4lbs (0%). The GLB-TBI group had significant improvements in diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol. GLB-TBI attendance was 89.6% and weekly self-monitoring of diet and activity was 68.8%. Relative to baseline, the GLB-TBI compliant group (≥80% attendance; ≥85% self-monitoring; n = 10) had a statistically significant decrease in weight at each assessment, the noncompliant group had a significant decrease between 6 and 12 months (n = 17), with no change in weight in the attention control group (n = 27). Conclusions Findings suggest for adults with TBI who are overweight or obese, participation in the GLB-TBI can significantly reduce weight and metabolic risk factors and increase self-reported habits for diet and exercise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]