Search

Background: Spetzler-Martin (SM) Grade III brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) represent a transitional risk zone between low- and high-grade BAVMs, characterized by diverse angioarchitecture. The primary treatment options are endovascular embolization, microsurgical resection (MS), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study compares the efficacy and outcomes of MS and SRS., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study involving patients from the MISTA database with SM Grade III BAVMs treated with MS or SRS between 2010 and 2023. Propensity matching was based on age, favorable modified Rankin Score (mRS) at presentation, nidus size, rupture status, location depth, and eloquence., Results: After matching, 60 patients were equally divided between MS and SRS groups. Median age (MS: 45.0 vs. SRS: 42.5 years, p = 0.3) and AVM size (MS: 3.2 vs. SRS: 2.9 cm 3 , p = 0.6) were similar. MS showed higher obliteration rates (93.3 %) compared to SRS (46.7 %) at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). The median time to obliteration post-SRS was 31.5 months (IQR: 15.3-60.0). SRS obliteration rates were 19 %, 29 %, and 59 % at 24, 36, and 60 months, respectively. Overall complication rates (MS: 30 % vs. SRS: 20 %, p = 0.4) and permanent complications (MS: 10 % vs. SRS: 13.3 %, p > 0.9) were similar. Hemorrhage occurred once in the MS group and none in the SRS (p > 0.9). Favorable outcomes (mRS 0-2) were higher with SRS than MS (93.3 % vs 80.0 %, p = 0.3), with one AVM-related mortality in the MS group., Conclusion: MS and SRS are viable treatments for SM Grade III BAVMs. Treatment choice should be individualized by a multidisciplinary team, considering patient goals., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The researchers reported that there was no conflict of interest, (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are uncommon cerebral lesions that can cause significant neurological complications. Surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment, but endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable alternatives., Objective: To compare the outcomes of endovascular embolization versus SRS in the treatment of AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I-III., Methods: This study combined retrospective data from 10 academic institutions in North America and Europe. Patients aged 1 to 90 years who underwent endovascular embolization or SRS for AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I-III between January 2010 and December 2023 were included., Results: The study included 244 patients, including 84 who had endovascular embolization and 160 who had SRS. Before propensity score matching (PSM), complete obliteration at the last follow-up was achieved in 74.5% of the SRS group compared with 57.8% of the embolization group (OR=0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.48; P=0.01). After propensity score matching, SRS still achieved significantly higher occlusion rates at last follow-up (78.9% vs 55.3%; OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.90; P=0.03).Hemorrhagic complications were higher in the embolization group than in the SRS group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance after PSM (13.2% vs 2.6%; OR=5.6; 95% CI 0.62 to 50.47; P=0.12). Similarly, re-treatment rate was higher in the embolization group (10.5% vs 5.3%; OR=2.11; 95% CI 0.36 to 12.31; P=0.40) compared with the SRS group., Conclusion: Our findings indicate that SRS has a significantly higher obliteration rate at last follow-up compared with endovascular embolization. Also, SRS has a higher tendency for fewer hemorrhagic complications and lower re-treatment rate. Further prospective studies are needed., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)