Search

Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is associated with fewer lead-related complications than a transvenous ICD; however, the subcutaneous ICD cannot provide bradycardia and antitachycardia pacing. Whether a modular pacing-defibrillator system comprising a leadless pacemaker in wireless communication with a subcutaneous ICD to provide antitachycardia and bradycardia pacing is safe remains unknown., Methods: We conducted a multinational, single-group study that enrolled patients at risk for sudden death from ventricular arrhythmias and followed them for 6 months after implantation of a modular pacemaker-defibrillator system. The safety end point was freedom from leadless pacemaker-related major complications, evaluated against a performance goal of 86%. The two primary performance end points were successful communication between the pacemaker and the ICD (performance goal, 88%) and a pacing threshold of up to 2.0 V at a 0.4-msec pulse width (performance goal, 80%)., Results: We enrolled 293 patients, 162 of whom were in the 6-month end-point cohort and 151 of whom completed the 6-month follow-up period. The mean age of the patients was 60 years, 16.7% were women, and the mean (±SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.1±12.6%. The percentage of patients who were free from leadless pacemaker-related major complications was 97.5%, which exceeded the prespecified performance goal. Wireless-device communication was successful in 98.8% of communication tests, which exceeded the prespecified goal. Of 151 patients, 147 (97.4%) had pacing thresholds of 2.0 V or less, which exceeded the prespecified goal. The percentage of episodes of arrhythmia that were successfully terminated by antitachycardia pacing was 61.3%, and there were no episodes for which antitachycardia pacing was not delivered owing to communication failure. Of 162 patients, 8 died (4.9%); none of the deaths were deemed to be related to arrhythmias or the implantation procedure., Conclusions: The leadless pacemaker in wireless communication with a subcutaneous ICD exceeded performance goals for freedom from major complications related to the leadless pacemaker, for communication between the leadless pacemaker and subcutaneous ICD, and for the percentage of patients with a pacing threshold up to 2.0 V at a 0.4-msec pulse width at 6 months. (Funded by Boston Scientific; MODULAR ATP ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04798768.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) and leadless pacemakers (LPs) are intended to diminish transvenous lead-related complications. However, S-ICDs do not deliver antibradycardia pacing or antitachycardia pacing, and currently, there is no commercially available coordinated leadless option for patients with defibrillator and (expected) pacing needs., Objective: We evaluated the performance, safety, and potential replacement strategies of a novel modular cardiac rhythm management (mCRM) system, a wirelessly communicating antitachycardia pacing-enabled LP and S-ICD in a preclinical model., Methods: LP implantation was attempted in 68 canine subjects, and in 38 an S-ICD was implanted as well. Animals were evaluated serially up to 18 months. At all evaluations, communication thresholds (CTs) between the devices, LP electrical parameters, and system-related complications were assessed. Different replacement strategies were tested., Results: The LP was successfully implanted in 67 of 68 (98.5%) and the concomitant S-ICD in 38 of 38 (100%). mCRM communication was successful in 1022 of 1024 evaluations (99.8%). The mean CT was 2.2 ± 0.7 V at implantation and stable afterward (18 months: 1.8 ± 0.7 V). In multivariable analysis, larger LP-to-S-ICD angle and dorsal posture were associated with higher CTs. At implantation, the mean pacing capture threshold, impedance, and R-wave amplitude were 0.3 ± 0.1 V, 898.4 ± 198.9 Ω, and 26.4 ± 8.2 mV. The mean pacing capture threshold remained stable and impedance and R-wave amplitudes were within acceptable ranges throughout (0.7 ± 0.4 V, 619.1 ± 90.6 Ω, and 20.1 ± 8.4 mV at 18 months). Different replacement strategies seem feasible., Conclusion: This first mCRM system demonstrated excellent performance up to 18 months in a preclinical model., (Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The primary objective was to assess the acute and 3-month performance of the modular antitachycardia pacing (ATP)-enabled leadless pacemaker (LP) and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) system, particularly device-device communication and ATP delivery., Background: Transvenous pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have considerable rates of lead complications. We examined the next step in multicomponent leadless cardiac rhythm management: feasibility of pacing (including ATP) by a LP, commanded by an implanted S-ICD through wireless, intrabody, device-device communication., Methods: The combined modular cardiac rhythm management therapy system of the LP and S-ICD prototypes was evaluated in 3 animal models (ovine, porcine, and canine) both in acute and chronic (90 days) experiments. LP performance, S-ICD to LP communication, S-ICD and LP rhythm discrimination, and ATP delivery triggered by the S-ICD were tested., Results: The LP and S-ICD were successfully implanted in 98% of the animals (39 of 40). Of the 39 animals, 23 were followed up for 90 days post-implant. LP performance was adequate and exhibited appropriate VVI behavior during the 90 days of follow-up in all tested animals. Unidirectional communication between the S-ICD and LP was successful in 99% (398 of 401) of attempts, resulting in 100% ATP delivery by the LP (10 beats at 81% of the coupling interval). Adequate S-ICD sensing was observed during normal sinus rhythm, LP pacing, and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation., Conclusions: This study presents the preclinical acute and chronic performance of the combined function of an ATP-enabled LP and S-ICD. Appropriate VVI functionality, successful wireless device-device communication, and ATP delivery were demonstrated by the LP. Clinical studies on safety and performance are needed., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)