Search

Aims: The purpose of this EP wire is to examine clinical practice in the field of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) management, with special focus on in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Methods and Results: Fifty-three European centres, all members of the EHRA-EP Research network, completed the questions of the survey. A dedicated strategy for OHCA management is active in 85% of the centres. Shockable tachyarrhythmias such as initial OHCA rhythm are reported in >70% of the patients in 64% of the centres. In-hospital therapeutic hypothermia was applied in >50% of the patients in 53% of the centres and in <50% in 47% of the centres. In the year 2011 90% of the centres performed >10 primary percutaneous coronary angioplasties (PCI) in OHCA patients. The survival rate, when the initial documented rhythm was shockable, was >30% in 42% of the centres, and conversely, was significantly lower when asystole or pulseless electrical activity was the initial rhythm. A favourable neurological recovery was reported in >50% of the patients in 13 (26%) centres and in 21-50% of the patients in 21 (44%). Conclusions: This EP wire survey demonstrates a favourable implementation in OHCA of an invasive management strategy, including coronary angiography/PCI and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, while therapeutic hypothermia appears to be underused. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: SCN1Bb encodes the β-subunit of the sodium channel. A mutation in SCN1Bb R214Q has recently been shown both to increase the Kv4.3 current and to decrease the sodium current. The variant was suggested to increase the susceptibility to Brugada syndrome (BrS).Objective: To sequence a population of BrS and early-onset lone atrial fibrillation (AF) patients for the R214Q mutation in the SCN1Bb gene.Methods: The coding sequence and splice junctions of SCN1Bb were bidirectionally sequenced by using Big Dye chemistry in 192 early-onset lone AF patients and 22 BrS patients.Results: Three probands carrying the R214Q variant were identified. No mutations were identified in genes previously associated with BrS or AF in these patients. Case 1 also had the onset of persistent lone AF at the age of 39 years. Case 2 was a lone AF case with onset at the age of 39 years and paroxysmal lone AF. Case 3 was a BrS patient with a type 1 electrocardiogram and onset of disease at the age of 54 years. Both lone AF patients had electrocardiograms that raised the suspicion of BrS, but intravenous flecainide testing was, in both cases, negative. R214Q was not present in the control group (n = 216) and has not previously been reported in conjunction to AF.Conclusion: Three patients of 192 young lone AF and 22 BrS patients carried the nonsynonymous R214Q mutations in SCN1Bb, thereby indicating that this variant increases the susceptibility to both BrS and AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies on incidences of sports-related sudden cardiac death (SrSCD) are few and data are needed for the discussion of preparticipation screening for cardiac disease.Objective: We sought to chart the incidence and etiology of SrSCD in the young in Denmark (population 5.4 million) and to compare this to the incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the background population.Methods: All 5,662 death certificates for decedents in the period 2000 to 2006 in the age group 12 to 35 years in Denmark were read independently by 2 physicians to identify cases of SCD. Information from autopsy reports, selected hospital records, and multiple registries was used to identify cases of SCD and SrSCD. SrSCD was defined as SCD occurring during or within 1 hour after exercise in a competitive athlete. The size of the athlete population was estimated from national survey data.Results: Fifteen (range 0 to 5 per year) cases of SrSCD were found, 8 of which had antecedent symptoms. The incidence rate was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 2.00) per 100,000 athlete person-years. The most common autopsy findings were arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (n = 4), sudden unexplained death (n = 4), and coronary artery disease (n = 2). The incidence of SCD in the general population age 12 to 35 was 3.76 (95% CI: 3.42 to 4.14) per 100,000 person-years.Conclusion: In Denmark, SrSCD is a rare occurrence and the incidence rate is lower than that of SCD in the general population. This may imply a low value of preparticipation screening of athletes in Denmark. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is effective in primary and secondary prevention for patients who are at high risk of sudden cardiac death. However, the current risk stratification of patients who may benefit from this therapy is unsatisfactory. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are DNA sequence variations occurring when a single nucleotide in the genome differs among members of a species. A novel concept has emerged being that these common genetic variations might modify the susceptibility of a certain population to specific diseases. Thus, genetic factors may also modulate the risk for arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, and identification of common variants could help to better identify patients at risk. The DISCOVERY study is an interventional, longitudinal, prospective, multi-centre diagnostic study that will enrol 1287 patients in approximately 80 European centres. In the genetic part of the DISCOVERY study, candidate gene polymorphisms involved in coding of the G-protein subunits will be correlated with the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention. Furthermore, in order to search for additional sequence variants contributing to ventricular arrhythmias, a genome-wide association study will be conducted if sufficient a priori evidence can be gathered. In the second part of the study, associations of SNPs with ventricular arrhythmias will be sought and a search for potential new biological arrhythmic pathways will be investigated. As it is a diagnostic study, DISCOVERY will also investigate the impact of long-term device diagnostic data on the management of patients suffering from chronic cardiac disease as well as medical decisions made regarding their treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia and a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Among the gene defects previously associated with AF is a gain of function of the slowly activating delayed rectifier potassium current IKs, secondary to mutations in KCNQ1. Coexpression of KCNE5, the gene encoding the MiRP4 beta-subunit, has been shown to reduce IKs.Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that mutations in KCNE5 are associated with AF in a large cohort of patients with AF.Methods: One-hundred fifty-eight patients with AF were screened for mutations in the coding region of KCNE5.Results: A missense mutation involving substitution of a phenylalanine for leucine at position 65 (L65F) was identified in one patient. This patient did not have a history of familial AF, and neither KCNQ1 nor KCNE2 mutations were found. Transient transfection of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing IKs(KCNQ1+KCNE1) with KCNE5 suppressed the developing and tail currents of IKs in a concentration-dependent manner. Transient transfection with KCNE5-L65F failed to suppress IKs, yielding a current indistinguishable from that recorded in the absence of KCNE5. Developing currents recorded during a test pulse to +60 mV and tail currents recorded upon repolarization to -40 mV both showed a significant concentration-dependent gain of function in IKs with expression of KCNE5-L65F vs KCNE5-WT.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that a missense mutation in KCNE5 may be associated with nonfamilial or acquired forms of AF. The arrhythmogenic mechanism most likely is a gain of function of IKs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While atrial fibrillation (AF) is a key risk factor for stroke, recent studies have suggested that atrial cardiomyopathy may also increase stroke risk in the absence of AF. This study aimed to evaluate genetic determinants for left atrial (LA) function and volumes and risk of stroke., Methods and Results: Polygenic scores (PGSs) for LA measures were constructed and used in 380 017 individuals in the UK Biobank, without history of ischemic stroke, systemic arterial embolism, or AF at enrollment. Risk of ischemic stroke was estimated using time-to-event models, considering all-cause death and incident AF as competing events. Systemic arterial embolism was investigated as a secondary end point. The PGS for LA passive emptying fraction was associated with risk of ischemic stroke. Individuals with a PGS for LA passive emptying fraction in the lowest quartile had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.12 for ischemic stroke compared with those in the top quartile ( P =0.004). These associations were robust in a subgroup free of prevalent cardiovascular disease at baseline (HR for lowest quartile versus top quartile, 1.22; P <0.001). No associations were found for 4 other PGSs for LA measures or for risk of systemic arterial embolism. Two-sample Mendelian randomization was conducted between LA measures and cardioembolic stroke and indicated a protective effect of higher LA functional measurements., Conclusions: The PGS for LA passive emptying fraction was significantly associated with incident ischemic stroke when considering AF as a competing risk. Consistent results were found in Mendelian randomization analyses. These findings suggest that atrial dysfunction may influence stroke risk independently of AF.

Importance: Understanding of the genetics of accessory atrioventricular pathways (APs) and affiliated arrhythmias is limited., Objective: To investigate the genetics of APs and affiliated arrhythmias., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of APs, defined by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and/or confirmed by electrophysiology (EP) study. Genome-wide significant AP variants were tested for association with AP-affiliated arrhythmias: paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular tachycardia, and cardiac arrest. AP variants were also tested in data on other heart diseases and measures of cardiac physiology. Individuals with APs and control individuals from Iceland (deCODE Genetics), Denmark (Copenhagen Hospital Biobank, Danish Blood Donor Study, and SupraGen/the Danish General Suburban Population Study [GESUS]), the US (Intermountain Healthcare), and the United Kingdom (UK Biobank) were included. Time of phenotype data collection ranged from January 1983 to December 2022. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to January 2024., Exposures: Sequence variants., Main Outcomes and Measures: Genome-wide significant association of sequence variants with APs., Results: The GWAS included 2310 individuals with APs (median [IQR] age, 43 [28-57] years; 1252 [54.2%] male and 1058 [45.8%] female) and 1 206 977 control individuals (median [IQR] year of birth, 1955 [1945-1970]; 632 888 [52.4%] female and 574 089 [47.6%] male). Of the individuals with APs, 909 had been confirmed in EP study. Three common missense variants were associated with APs, in the genes CCDC141 (p.Arg935Trp: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.24-1.52, and p.Ala141Val: aOR, 1.55; 95% CI 1.34-1.80) and SCN10A (p.Ala1073Val: OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.30). The 3 variants associated with PSVT and the SCN10A variant associated with AF, supporting an effect on AP-affiliated arrhythmias. All 3 AP risk alleles were associated with higher heart rate and shorter PR interval, and have reported associations with chronotropic response., Conclusions and Relevance: Associations were found between sequence variants and APs that were also associated with risk of PSVT, and thus likely atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, but had allele-specific associations with AF and conduction disorders. Genetic variation in the modulation of heart rate, chronotropic response, and atrial or atrioventricular node conduction velocity may play a role in the risk of AP-affiliated arrhythmias. Further research into CCDC141 could provide insights for antiarrhythmic therapeutic targeting in the presence of an AP.

Background: The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) score integrates types and dosages of guideline-directed pharmacotherapies for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined the effects of cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to the modified HFC (mHFC) score in 1116 patients with nonischemic HFrEF from the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic HF on Mortality (DANISH)., Methods and Results: Patients were assigned scores for renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors, beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0, no use; 1, < 50% of maximum dosage; 2, ≥ 50% of maximum dosage). The maximum score was 6, corresponding to ≥ 50% of maximum dosage for all therapies. The median baseline mHFC score was 4, and the median follow-up was 9.5 years. Compared with an mHFC score of 3-4, an mHFC score of 1-2 was associated with a higher rate of all-cause death (mHFC = 1-2: adjusted HR 1.67 [95% CI, 1.23-2.28]; mHFC = 3-4, reference; mHFC = 5-6: adjusted HR 1.07 [95% CI, 0.87-1.31]). ICD implantation did not reduce all-cause death compared with control (reference) (HR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08]), regardless of mHFC score (mHFC = 1-2: HR 0.98 [95% CI, 0.56-1.71]; mHFC = 3-4: HR 0.89 [95% CI,0.66-1.20]; mHFC = 5-6: HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.64-1.12]; P interaction , 0.65). Similarly, ICD implantation did not reduce cardiovascular death (HR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]), regardless of mHFC score (P interaction , 0.59). The ICD group had a lower rate of sudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.60 [95% CI,0.40-0.92]); this association was not modified by mHFC score (P interaction , 0.35)., Conclusions: Lower mHFC scores were associated with higher rates of all-cause death. ICD implantation did not result in an overall survival benefit in patients with nonischemic HFrEF, regardless of mHFC score., Competing Interests: Disclosures JJT reports speaker's fees from Astra Zeneca and BMS and travel grants from AstraZeneca. JCN reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Danish Heart Foundation outside the submitted work. NEB reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation, Health Insurance Denmark, and the Kaj Hansen Foundation, not related to this work. FG is an aAdvisor to Abbott, Ionis, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Pfizer and is a speaker at Novartis. CH reports research grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Lundbeck Foundation, and the Danish Heart Foundation (not related to this work). JHS reports a research grant from Medtronic (outside of this work) and speaker's fee from Medtronic and is a member of the Advisory Board for Medtronic and for Vital Beats. SP reports a travel grant from Abbott. LK reports speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. JHB reports advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca and Bayer, consultant honoraria from Novartis and AstraZeneca and travel grants from AstraZeneca. All other authors have no disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with an increased prevalence of cardiovascular diseases compared with the general population. Any association between polygenic risk for HS, risk of incident cardiometabolic outcomes, and the plasma proteome is unclear., Objective: To investigate the genetic correlation between HS and cardiometabolic disease., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a polygenic risk score (PRS) for HS to examine the risks of coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes and identify changes in the plasma proteome in individuals of European ancestry from the UK Biobank. Participants were enrolled from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010. End of follow-up was January 1, 2023. Correlations were assessed between HS susceptibility and cardiometabolic traits using linkage disequilibrium score regression. Odds ratios were assessed in logistic regressions. The risk of incident CAD and diabetes was estimated in cause-specific survival models designed as time-to-event analyses., Exposure: The PRS for HS., Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were CAD and diabetes diagnosis measured by logistic regressions and incident disease measured by Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, and smoking status., Results: The study included 391 481 individuals (median [IQR] age, 58 [51-64] years; 209 235 [53%] female). Genetic variants for HS correlated significantly with variants associated with CAD, diabetes, and plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and C-reactive protein. Compared with the low-risk group, a high PRS for HS (≥75th percentile) conferred odds ratios of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.06-1.12; P < .001) for CAD and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.10-1.17; P < .001) for diabetes. Estimates remained consistent when examining only incident CAD and diabetes. The PRS for HS was significantly associated with altered expression of 58 plasma proteins. Integrating this proteomic profile and the PRS for HS in a machine learning model improved prediction of CAD and diabetes compared with a reference model based on sex, age, and body mass index., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that a high genetic risk of HS is associated with increased risk of subsequent CAD and diabetes and altered composition of the plasma proteome. Additional investigation into the identified proteins and their potential roles as drug targets is warranted.

Aims: Physical activity has shown association with ventricular arrhythmia, however, the role of specific behavioral patterns over a 24 h cycle remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to explore associations between physical behavior and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy., Methods and Results: We included patients with an ICD at two European sites, who wore wrist-based accelerometers capturing 24 h movement and sleep behaviours for 28 days. Behavioural measures included activity volume, duration and intensity, sleep duration, and efficiency. Participants were followed for 12 months for the outcome of appropriate ICD therapy. Cox proportional hazard models with restricted cubic splines were used for the analysis. Lastly, the predictive capacity was tested. A total of 253 ICD patients were included (mean age 63.5 (±10.2), 48 (19.0%) female). During follow-up, 40 participants (15.8%) received appropriate ICD therapy; 32 anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) only (12.6%), 5 shock only (2.0%), and 3 combined ATP and shock (1.2%). In the adjusted model, high inactive duration (HR 1.40 (95% 1.10-1.78)), peak walking cadence (HR 1.07 (95% 1.03-1.12)), and total sleep duration (HR 1.50 (1.02-2.22)) were associated with the outcome. The dose-response relationship was U-shaped for inactive duration with a cut-off at 16 h, and linear for peak cadence and sleep. The prediction model reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 ± 0.03, with highest accuracy in the first months., Conclusion: Wearable-derived 24 h movement and sleep behaviours collected over 28 days were associated with later appropriate ICD therapy risk. Testing of the predictive value of digital biomarkers for enhanced risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmia warrants larger prospective studies., Clinical Trial Registration: National Trial Registration (NL9218, http://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/)., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R.E.K. reports consultancy fees and research grants from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott and has stock options from AtaCor Medical Inc. F.V.Y.T. has grants or contracts from the Dutch Research Council (NWO) and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science and received payment or honoraria from Boston Scientific and Abbott (no personal financial gain). S.Z.D. reports consultancy fees and research grants from Acesion Pharma and Cortrium, and has received payment or honoraria from Bristol, Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Bayer. P.K.J. reports consultancy fees and research grants from Abbott and Medtronic, payment or honoraria from Abbott and Medtronic, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbott and Medtronic. J.H.S. reports grants or contracts from Medtronic (payed to institution), payment or honoraria from Medtronic, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbott and Medtronic, and participation in Advisory Board for Medtronic and Vital Beats. J.L. reports having stock or stock option from Activinsights Ltd. T.O.A. reports having stock or stock options from Vital Beats. D.M.F., M.Z.H.K., N.R., and H.L.T. have nothing to declare., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, disrupts the heart's rhythm through numerous small re-entry circuits in the atrial tissue, leading to irregular atrial contractions. The condition poses significant health risks, including increased stroke risk, heart failure, and reduced quality of life. Given the complexity of AF and its growing incidence globally, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) may provide additional benefits for people with AF or those undergoing routine treatment for the condition., Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of ExCR compared with non-exercise controls for people who currently have AF or who have been treated for AF., Search Methods: We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, PsycINFO Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection Thomson Reuters, CINAHL EBSCO, LILACS BIREME, and two clinical trial registers on 24 March 2024. We imposed no language restrictions., Selection Criteria: We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated ExCR interventions compared with any type of non-exercise control. We included adults 18 years of age or older with any subtype of AF or those who had received treatment for AF., Data Collection and Analysis: Five review authors independently screened and extracted data in duplicate. We assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's RoB 1 tool as outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We assessed clinical and statistical heterogeneity by visual inspection of the forest plots and by using standard Chi² and I² statistics. We performed meta-analyses using random-effects models for continuous and dichotomised outcomes. We calculated standardised mean differences where different scales were used for the same outcome. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence., Main Results: We included 20 RCTs involving a total of 2039 participants with AF. All trials were conducted between 2006 and 2024, with a follow-up period ranging from eight weeks to five years. We assessed the certainty of evidence as moderate to very low. Five trials assessed comprehensive ExCR programmes, which included educational or psychological interventions, or both; the remaining 15 trials compared exercise-only cardiac rehabilitation with controls. The overall risk of bias in the included studies was mixed. Details on random sequence generation, allocation concealment, and use of intention-to-treat analysis were typically poorly reported. Evidence from nine trials (n = 1173) suggested little to no difference in mortality between ExCR and non-exercise controls (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.49; I² = 0%; 101 deaths; low-certainty evidence). Based on evidence from 10 trials (n = 825), ExCR may have little to no effect on SAEs (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.67; I² = 0%; 28 events; low-certainty evidence). Evidence from four trials (n = 378) showed that ExCR likely reduced AF recurrence (measured via Holter monitoring) compared to controls (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.88; I² = 2%; moderate-certainty evidence). ExCR may reduce AF symptom severity (mean difference (MD) -1.59, 95% CI -2.98 to -0.20; I² = 61%; n = 600; low-certainty evidence); likely reduces AF symptom burden (MD -1.61, 95% CI -2.76 to -0.45; I² = 0%; n = 317; moderate-certainty evidence); may reduce AF episode frequency (MD -1.29, 95% CI -2.50 to -0.07; I² = 75%; n = 368; low-certainty evidence); and likely reduces AF episode duration (MD -0.58, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.03; I² = 0%; n = 317; moderate-certainty evidence), measured via the AF Severity Scale (AFSS) questionnaire. Moderate-certainty evidence from six trials (n = 504) showed that ExCR likely improved the mental component summary measure in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (MD 2.66, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.11; I² = 2%), but the effect of ExCR on the physical component summary measure was very uncertain (MD 1.75, 95% CI -0.31 to 3.81; I² = 52%; very low-certainty evidence). ExCR also may improve individual components of HRQoL (general health, vitality, emotional role functioning, and mental health) and exercise capacity (peak oxygen uptake (VO 2peak ) and 6-minute walk test) following ExCR. The effects of ExCR on serious adverse events and exercise capacity were consistent across different models of ExCR delivery: centre compared to home-based, exercise dose, exercise only compared to comprehensive programmes, and aerobic training alone compared to aerobic plus resistance programmes. Using univariate meta-regression, there was evidence of significant association between location of trial and length of longest follow-up on exercise capacity., Authors' Conclusions: Due to few randomised participants and typically short-term follow-up, the impact of ExCR on all-cause mortality or serious adverse events for people with AF is uncertain. ExCR likely improves AF-specific measures including reduced AF recurrence, symptom burden, and episode duration, as well as the mental components of HRQoL. ExCR may improve AF symptom severity, episode frequency, and VO 2peak . Future high-quality RCTs are needed to assess the benefits of ExCR for people with AF on patient-relevant outcomes including AF symptom severity and burden, AF recurrence, AF-specific quality of life, and clinical events such as mortality, readmissions, and serious adverse events. High-quality trials are needed to investigate how AF subtype and clinical setting (i.e. primary and secondary care) may influence ExCR effectiveness., (Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

We aimed to identify and characterise behavioural profiles in patients at high risk of SCD, by using deep representation learning of day-to-day behavioural recordings. We present a pipeline that employed unsupervised clustering on low-dimensional representations of behavioural time-series data learned by a convolutional residual variational neural network (ResNet-VAE). Data from the prospective, observational SafeHeart study conducted at two large tertiary university centers in the Netherlands and Denmark were used. Patients received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) between May 2021 and September 2022 and wore wearable devices using accelerometer technology during 180 consecutive days. A total of 272 patients (mean age of 63.1 ± 10.2 years, 81% male) were eligible with a total sampling of 37,478 days of behavioural data (138 ± 47 days per patient). Deep representation learning identified five distinct behavioural profiles: Cluster A (n = 46) had very low physical activity levels and a disturbed sleep pattern. Cluster B (n = 70) had high activity levels, mainly at light-to-moderate intensity. Cluster C (n = 63) exhibited a high-intensity activity profile. Cluster D (n = 51) showed above-average sleep efficiency. Cluster E (n = 42) had frequent waking episodes and poor sleep. Annual risks of malignant ventricular arrhythmias ranged from 30.4% in Cluster A to 9.8% and 9.5% for Clusters D-E, respectively. Compared to low-risk profiles (D-E), Cluster A demonstrated a three-to-four fold increased risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias adjusted for clinical covariates (adjusted HR 3.63, 95% CI 1.54-8.53, p < 0.001). These behavioural profiles may guide more personalised approaches to ventricular arrhythmia and SCD prevention., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) serve multiple purposes, including shared decision-making and patient communication, treatment monitoring, and health technology assessment. Patient monitoring using PROMs is constrained by recall and non-response bias, respondent burden, and missing data. We evaluated the potential of behavioural digital biomarkers obtained from a wearable accelerometer to achieve personalized predictions of PROMs., Methods and Results: Data from the multicentre, prospective SafeHeart study conducted at Amsterdam University Medical Center in the Netherlands and Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, were used. The study enrolled patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator between May 2021 and September 2022 who then wore wearable devices with raw acceleration output to capture digital biomarkers reflecting physical behaviour. To collect PROMs, patients received the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire at two instances: baseline and after six months. Multivariable Tobit regression models were used to explore associations between digital biomarkers and PROMs, specifically whether digital biomarkers could enable PROM prediction. The study population consisted of 303 patients (mean age 62.9 ± 10.9 years, 81.2% male). Digital biomarkers showed significant correlations to patient-reported physical and social limitations, severity and frequency of symptoms, and quality of life. Prospective validation of the Tobit models indicated moderate correlations between the observed and predicted scores for KCCQ [concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.49, mean difference: 1.07 points] and EQ5D-5L (CCC = 0.38, mean difference: 0.02 points)., Conclusion: Wearable digital biomarkers correlate with PROMs, and may be leveraged for real-time prediction. These findings hold promise for monitoring of PROMs through wearable accelerometers., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Purpose: Subclinical thyroid dysfunction is a marker for atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke risk. This study explored the effects of AF screening according to thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels., Methods: An AF screening trial (the LOOP study) was analyzed post-hoc according to baseline TSH. The primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, all-cause death, and the combination of stroke, SE, and cardiovascular death., Results: TSH measurement was available in 6003 of 6004 trial participants, 1500 randomized to implantable loop recorder (ILR) screening for AF and anticoagulation upon detection vs. 4503 to usual care; mean age was 74.7±4.1 years and 2836 (47%) were women. AF detection was approximately triple for ILR vs usual care across TSH tertiles (adjusted p-interaction=0.44). In the first tertile, screening was associated with decreased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio 0.52 [0.30-0.90]; p=0.02) and stroke, SE, or cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 0.54 [0.34-0.84]; p=0.006) compared to usual care, while no effect was observed among participants with higher TSH (adjusted p-interaction 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). There was no effect on other outcomes. Analyses of continuous TSH or excluding those with abnormal TSH or thyroid medication showed similar results., Conclusion: AF screening and subsequent treatment was associated with decreased stroke risk among participants with low TSH, though the yield of screening was similar across TSH levels. TSH may be useful as a marker to indicate benefit from AF screening vs. overdiagnosis and overtreatment. These findings should be considered exploratory and warrant further study., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT0203645., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. See the journal About page for additional terms.)

Background: Advances in medical treatment and outcomes in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients incentivize a need for improved candidate selection and identification of risk factors for ICD therapy. We examined contemporary rates of and risk factors for ICD therapy., Methods: Patients with ICD for primary (PP) or secondary prevention (SP), implanted between January 2010 and December 2020, were followed for appropriate and inappropriate incident and recurrent shock., Results: Overall, 2998 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 12.7 years, 20% female, 73% ICD carriers, and 47.1% SP) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 4.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.1-7.4) years. A total of 426/2998 (14.2%) patients had shock; 364/2998 (12.1%) had appropriate and 82/2998 (2.7%) inappropriate shock, with annualized event rates of 2.34 (2.11-2.59) and 0.49 (0.39-0.61) per 100 person-years, respectively. Of those with shock, 133/364 (36.5%) experienced recurrent appropriate shock and 8/364 (2.2%) received recurrent inappropriate shock, with event rates of 10.57 (8.85-12.53) and 0.46 (0.20-0.92), respectively. In multivariable analyses, female sex was associated with a reduced risk of incident appropriate shock (hazard ratio 0.69 [95% confidence interval 0.52; 0.91]). Of other variables, only revascularization status was associated with recurrent appropriate shock in PP, and CRT-D with recurrent appropriate shock in the overall cohort., Conclusion: One in eight ICD recipients received appropriate shock 2-7 years after guideline-directed implantation. More than one-third of patients with a first shock experienced recurrent shock. Few clinical variables showed potential in predicting shocks, illustrating a need for more advanced tools to select candidates for implantation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Electrocardiographic abnormalities are common in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and are included in the 2010 Task Force Criteria. Their time course, however, remains uncertain. In this retrospective observational study, we aimed to assess the long-term evolution of electrocardiographic characteristics and their relation to ventricular arrhythmias., Methods and Results: Three hundred fifty-three patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy as per the 2010 Task Force Criteria with 6871 automatically processed 12-lead digital ECGs were included. The relationship between the electrocardiographic parameters and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias was assessed at 10 years from the first ECG. Electrocardiographic parameters were compared between the first contact ECG, the ECG at diagnosis, and the most recent ECG. Median time between the first and the latest ECG was 6 [interquartile range, 1-14] years. Reductions of QRS voltage, R- and T-wave amplitudes between the first, diagnostic, and the latest ECGs were observed across precordial and extremity leads. Mean QRS duration increased from 96 to 102 ms ( P <0.001), terminal activation duration (V 1 ) from 47 to 52 ms ( P <0.001), and QTc from 419 to 432 ms ( P <0.001). T-wave inversions in leads V 3 to V 6 and aVF at first ECG were associated with ventricular arrhythmias (adjusted hazard ratio [HR adj ][V 3 ], 2.03 [95% CI, 1.23-3.34] and HR adj [aVF], 1.87 [95% CI, 1.13-3.08])., Conclusions: Depolarization and repolarization parameters evolved over time in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, supporting the progressive nature of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Electrocardiographic abnormalities may be detected before diagnosis and might, although not fulfilling the 2010 Task Force Criteria, be markers of early disease. T-wave inversion in leads V 3 or aVF before diagnosis was associated with ventricular arrhythmias during follow-up.

Aims: Although body mass index (BMI) is the most commonly used anthropometric measure to assess adiposity, alternative indices such as the waist-to-height ratio may better reflect the location and amount of ectopic fat as well as the weight of the skeleton., Methods and Results: The prognostic value of several alternative anthropometric measures was compared with that of BMI in 1116 patients with non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in DANISH. The association between anthropometric measures and all-cause death was adjusted for prognostic variables, including natriuretic peptides. Median follow-up was 9.5 years (25th-75th percentile, 7.9-10.9). Compared to patients with a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 (n = 363), those with a BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 had a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, although this association was only statistically significant for a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 (n = 91) (all-cause death: hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.48; cardiovascular death: HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.69-3.58). Compared to a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 , a BMI <18.5 kg/m 2 (n = 24) was associated with a numerically, but not a significantly, higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death. Greater waist-to-height ratio (as an exemplar of indices not incorporating weight) was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death (HR for the highest vs. the lowest quintile: all-cause death: HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.53-2.92; cardiovascular death: HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.49-3.15)., Conclusion: In patients with non-ischaemic HFrEF, there was a clear association between greater adiposity and higher long-term mortality., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00542945., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Wearable health technologies are increasingly popular. Yet, wearable monitoring only works when devices are worn as intended, and adherence reporting lacks standardization. In this study, we aimed to explore the long-term adherence to a wrist-worn activity tracker in the prospective SafeHeart study and identify patient characteristics associated with adherence., Methods and Results: This study enrolled 303 participants, instructed to wear a wrist-worn accelerometer day and night for 6 months. Long-term adherence was defined as valid days (≥22 h of wear time) divided by expected days, and daily adherence as mean hours of wear time per 24 h period. Optimal, moderate, and low long-term and daily adherence groups were defined as long-term adherence above or below 95 and 75% and daily adherence above or below 90 and 75%. Regression models were used to identify patient characteristics associated with long-term adherence. In total, 296 participants [median age 64 years; interquartile range (IQR) 57-72; 19% female] were found eligible, yielding 44 003 days for analysis. The median long-term adherence was 88.2% (IQR 74.6-96.5%). A total of 83 (28%), 127 (42.9%), and 86 (29.1%) participants had optimal, moderate, and low long-term adherence, and 163 (55.1%), 87 (29.4%), and 46 (15.5%) had optimal, moderate, and low daily adherence, respectively. Age and smoking habits differed significantly between adherence levels, and increasing changeover intervals improved the degree of long-term adherence., Conclusion: Long-term adherence to a wearable activity tracker was 88.2% over a 6-month period. Older age and longer changeover interval were positively associated with long-term adherence. This serves as a benchmark for future studies that rely on wearable devices., Trial Registration Number: The National Trial Registration number: NL9218 (https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/)., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: H.L.T., R.K., T.O.A., J.H.S., F.V.Y.T., and J.L. received funding for the SafeHeart study through the EUROSTARS PROJECT E! 113994 Horizon 2020 grant. T.O.A. is a co-founder of Vital Beats and has stock ownership. T.O.A. is the co-author of a pending patent application that is within the field of this study. J.L. is an employee and shareholder of Activinsights Ltd, the manufacturers of the behavioral assessment wearable used in the study. F.V.Y.T. received consulting honoraria (no personal gain) from Boston Scientific and Abbott. J.H.S. received research grants from Medtronic outside this study, and speaker fee and consultancy fee from Medtronic and Vital Beats. S.Z.D. is a consultant for Vital Beats. D.M.F. and M.Z.H.K. declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Mounting evidence indicates that even device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation is associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HF). However, the potential impact of atrial fibrillation screening on HF remains unknown., Methods: The LOOP Study (Atrial Fibrillation detected by Continuous ECG Monitoring using Implantable Loop Recorder to prevent Stroke in High-risk Individuals) evaluated the effects of atrial fibrillation screening on stroke prevention using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) versus usual care in older individuals with additional stroke risk factors. In this secondary analysis, we explored the following HF end points: (1) HF event or cardiovascular death; (2) HF event; (3) event with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); and (4) HFrEF event or cardiovascular death. Outcomes were assessed in a Cox model both as time-to-first events and as total (first and recurrent) events analyzed using the Andersen-and-Gill method., Results: Of 6004 participants (mean age 74.7 and 52.7% men), 1501 were randomized to ILR screening and 4503 to the control group. In total, 77 (5.1%) in the ILR group versus 295 (6.6%) in the control group experienced the primary outcome of an HF event or cardiovascular death. Compared with usual care, ILR screening was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the primary outcome for the time-to-first event analysis (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-1.01]) and the total event analysis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.59-1.01]). Similar results were obtained for the HF event. A significant risk reduction in total events was observed in the ILR group for the composite of HFrEF event or cardiovascular death and for HFrEF event (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.98] and 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97], respectively)., Conclusions: In an older population with additional stroke risk factors, ILR screening for atrial fibrillation tended to be associated with a lower rate of total HF events and cardiovascular death, particularly those related to HFrEF. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant further investigation., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02036450., Competing Interests: Dr Krieger reports to be a Medtronic Focus Group member. Dr Healey reports research grants and speaking honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, and Servier, and consulting fees from Boston Scientific and Bayer, not related to this work. Dr Branges reports research grants from The Region of Zealand, The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, The Danish Heart Foundation, and Theravance, and speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol-Myers Squibb, not related to this work. Dr Køber reports speaker honoraria from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Boehringer, not related to this work. Dr Svendsen reports to be a member of VitalBeats and Medtronic advisory boards and to have received speaker honoraria and research grants from Medtronic in relation to this work and outside this work. Dr Diederichsen reports to be a part-time employee of VitalBeats and an advisor at Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, not related to this work. The other authors report no conflicts.

Importance: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has a substantial genetic component. The importance of polygenic risk is well established, while the contribution of rare variants to disease risk warrants characterization in large cohorts., Objective: To identify rare predicted loss-of-function (pLOF) variants associated with AF and elucidate their role in risk of AF, cardiomyopathy (CM), and heart failure (HF) in combination with a polygenic risk score (PRS)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a genetic association and nested case-control study. The impact of rare pLOF variants was evaluated on the risk of incident AF. HF and CM were assessed in cause-specific Cox regressions. End of follow-up was July 1, 2022. Data were analyzed from January to October 2023. The UK Biobank enrolled 502 480 individuals aged 40 to 69 years at inclusion in the United Kingdom between March 13, 2006, and October 1, 2010. UK residents of European ancestry were included. Individuals with prior diagnosis of AF were excluded from analyses of incident AF., Exposures: Rare pLOF variants and an AF PRS., Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of AF and incident HF or CM prior to and subsequent to AF diagnosis., Results: A total of 403 990 individuals (218 489 [54.1%] female) with a median (IQR) age of 58 (51-63) years were included; 24 447 were diagnosed with incident AF over a median (IQR) follow-up period of 13.3 (12.4-14.0) years. Rare pLOF variants in 6 genes (TTN, RPL3L, PKP2, CTNNA3, KDM5B, and C10orf71) were associated with AF. Of these, TTN, RPL3L, PKP2, CTNNA3, and KDM5B replicated in an external cohort. Combined with high PRS, rare pLOF variants conferred an odds ratio of 7.08 (95% CI, 6.03-8.28) for AF. Carriers with high PRS also had a substantial 10-year risk of AF (16% in female individuals and 24% in male individuals older than 60 years). Rare pLOF variants were associated with increased risk of CM both prior to AF (hazard ratio [HR], 3.13; 95% CI, 2.24-4.36) and subsequent to AF (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.89-4.69)., Conclusions and Relevance: Rare and common genetic variation were associated with an increased risk of AF. The findings provide insights into the genetic underpinnings of AF and may aid in future genetic risk stratification.

A budget impact analysis estimates the short-term difference between the cost of the current treatment strategy and a new treatment strategy, in this case to implement population screening for atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study is to estimate the financial impact of implementing population-based AF-screening of 75-year-olds compared with the current setting of no screening from a healthcare payer perspective in eight European countries. The net budget impact of AF-screening was estimated in country-specific settings for Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden. Country-specific parameters were used to allow for variations in healthcare systems and to reflect the healthcare sector in the country of interest. Similar results can be seen in all countries AF-screening incurs savings of stroke-related costs since AF treatment reduces the number of strokes. However, the increased number of detected AF and higher drug acquisition will increase the drug costs as well as the costs of physician- and control visits. The net budget impact per invited varied from €10 in Ireland to €122 in the Netherlands. The results showed the increased costs of implementing AF-screening were mainly driven by increased drug costs and screening costs. In conclusion, across Europe, though the initial cost of screening and more frequent use of oral anti-coagulants will increase the healthcare payers' costs, introducing population screening for AF will result in savings of stroke-related costs., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.E., J.L., L.B., and K.A. report no conflicts of interest. L.Å.L. has received lecture fees and advisory board fees from BMS/Pfizer, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Zenicor and own stocks in Astra Zeneca. J.H.S. reports to be a member of Medtronic and Vital Beats advisory boards and to have received speaker honoraria and research grants from Medtronic. R.B.S. has received lecture fees and advisory board fees from BMS/Pfizer and Bayer outside this work. D.E. reports no conflicts of interest. C.M. and C.W. are employees of the Institute for Epidemiology, Statistics and Informatics GmbH. The Institute for Epidemiology, Statistics and Informatics GmbH has received grants from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb and CSL Behring outside the submitted work. S.Z.D. reports consultancy fees from VitalBeats, BMS/Pfizer, Cortrium, and Acesion Pharma, speaker grants from BMS/Pfizer and Bayer, and travel grants from Abbott and Boston Scientific. G.B. reports speaker’s fees of small amount from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, and Sanofi outside of the submitted work. C.M.B. reports no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Individuals with subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) face an increased risk of thromboembolic events, which may potentially be mitigated through AF screening and subsequent anticoagulation. However, data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) indicate a lower stroke risk in subclinical AF compared with the clinical phenotype. This-along with the inherent bleeding risk related to anticoagulation-seems to render the net clinical benefit of AF screening less evident. Further, current guidelines recommend consideration of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and AF episode duration to guide screening and treatment. These recommendations, in general, lack support and seem questionable in view of the limited RCT data. More evidence is warranted to provide insights into the potential benefits of screening and treatment of screen-detected AF in specific population subgroups and AF phenotypes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: L.Y.X., O.B.V., and D.E. have no conflicts of interest to report. J.H.S. reports to be a member of Vital Beats and Medtronic advisory boards and to have received speaker honoraria and research grants from Medtronic outside this work. S.Z.D. reports to be a part-time employee of Vital Beats and advisor at Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, not related to this work., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)