Search

Venetoclax is an approved BCL-2 inhibitor, currently under evaluation in different hematological malignancies in adult and pediatric populations. Venetoclax is available as 10, 50, and 100 mg tablets. To provide an alternative to patients who find taking the commonly prescribed 100 mg tablet a challenge, the interchangeability of lower-strength tablets with the 100 mg tablet was investigated. Additionally, newly developed oral suspension powder formulations to facilitate dosing in pediatrics were evaluated.Pharmacokinetic data from 80 healthy female participants from three phase I studies were utilized to evaluate the bioavailability of (1) 10 and 50 mg tablets relative to a 100 mg tablet; (2) 0.72 and 7.2% (drug to total weight) oral powder formulations relative to the 100 mg tablet; and (3) oral powder formulations administered using different vehicles (apple juice, apple sauce, and yogurt) relative to water under fed conditions.Bioavailability assessments at a 100 mg dose of venetoclax demonstrated bioequivalence across the 10, 50, and 100 mg tablet strengths. Oral powder formulations met the bioequivalence criteria (0.80-1.25) with respect to area under the concentration-time curve to time of the last measurable concentration (AUCThe smaller-sized tablets (10 and 50 mg) and the newly developed oral powder formulations of venetoclax can be used interchangeably with the 100 mg tablets to improve the patients' experience, while maintaining adequate exposure. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIERS: NCT01682616, 11 September 2012; NCT02005471, 9 December 2013; NCT02242942, 17 September 2014; NCT02203773, 30 July 2014; NCT02287233, 10 November 2014; NCT02993523, 15 December 2016; NCT03069352, 3 March 2017.

This study evaluated venetoclax population pharmacokinetics (popPK) in patients with treatment-naïve acute myeloid leukemia and assessed the relationship between venetoclax exposure and clinical response for venetoclax in combination with either a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). A total of 771 patients who received venetoclax from 5 Phase 1-3 studies were included in the popPK model. Exposure-response analyses included data from 575 patients for venetoclax/placebo plus HMA and 279 patients for venetoclax/placebo plus LDAC. The popPK model successfully characterized venetoclax plasma concentrations over time and confirmed venetoclax exposure did not vary significantly with age, weight, sex, mild to moderate hepatic impairment, or mild to severe renal impairment. Asian patients had 67% higher mean relative bioavailability than non-Asian patients, however the range of exposures in Asian patients was similar to non-Asian patients. For all efficacy endpoints with both treatment combinations, efficacy was higher in the venetoclax treatment groups compared with the respective control arm of placebo plus azacitidine or LDAC. Within patients who received venetoclax, no significant exposure-efficacy relationships were identified for either treatment combination, indicating that the beneficial effects of venetoclax were already maximized in the dose ranges studied. There was no apparent effect of venetoclax exposure on treatment-emergent Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia or infections for either combination. Rates of treatment-emergent Grade ≥3 neutropenia were higher in the venetoclax treatment arms compared with the respective control arms; however, within patients who received venetoclax, there was only a shallow relationship or no apparent relationship with venetoclax exposure for venetoclax plus HMA or LDAC, respectively. Along with the efficacy and safety data previously published, the exposure-response analyses support the venetoclax dose regimens of 400 mg once daily (QD) plus HMA and 600 mg QD plus LDAC in treatment-naïve AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Veliparib (ABT‐888) is a poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor in development for the treatment of high‐grade ovarian cancer or BRCA‐mutated breast cancer in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The population pharmacokinetics of veliparib were characterized using combined data from 1470 adult subjects with ovarian cancer, breast cancer, or other solid tumors enrolled in 6 phase 1 studies, 1 phase 2 study, and 2 phase 3 studies of veliparib oral doses of 10 to 400 mg twice daily as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. A 1‐compartment model with linear clearance and first‐order absorption best characterized veliparib pharmacokinetics. The predicted apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vc/F) were 479 L/day and 152 L, respectively. The significant covariates in the final model included albumin, creatinine clearance, strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, and sex on CL/F and albumin, body weight, and sex on Vc/F. Mild and moderate renal impairment increased veliparib median (95%CI) steady‐state AUC (AUCss) by 27.3% (23.7%‐30.9%) and 65.4% (56.0%‐75.5%), respectively, compared with normal renal function. Male subjects had 16.5% (7.53%‐23.9%) lower AUCss compared with female subjects and coadministration with strong CYP2D6 inhibitors increased AUCss by 13.0% (6.11%‐20.8%). Race, age, region, cancer type, or enzyme (CYP3A4, CYP2C19) or transporter (P‐glycoprotein, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1/2, organic cation transporter 2) inhibiting/inducing comedications were not found to significantly impact veliparib pharmacokinetics. Other than baseline creatinine clearance and hence renal impairment effect on veliparib clearance, no other covariates had a clinically meaningful effect on veliparib exposure warranting dose adjustment.

Budigalimab is a humanized, recombinant, Fc mutated IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1) receptor, currently in phase I clinical trials. The safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and budigalimab dose selection from monotherapy dose escalation and multihistology expansion cohorts were evaluated in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors who received budigalimab at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks (Q2W) in dose escalation, including Japanese patients that received 3 and 10 mg/kg Q2W. PK modeling and PK/PD assessments informed the dosing regimen in expansion phase using data from body‐weight‐based dosing in the escalation phase, based on which patients in the multihistology expansion cohort received flat doses of 250 mg Q2W or 500 mg every four weeks (Q4W). Immune‐related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11 of 59 patients (18.6%), of which 1 of 59 (1.7%) was considered grade ≥ 3 and the safety profile of budigalimab was consistent with other PD‐1 targeting agents. No treatment‐related grade 5 AEs were reported. Four responses per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were reported in the dose escalation cohort and none in the multihistology expansion cohort. PK of budigalimab was approximately dose proportional and sustained > 99% peripheral PD‐1 receptor saturation was observed by 2 hours postdosing, across doses. PK/PD and safety profiles were comparable between Japanese and Western patients, and exposure‐safety analyses did not indicate any trends. Observed PK and PD‐1 receptor saturation were consistent with model predictions for flat doses and less frequent regimens, validating the early application of PK modeling and PK/PD assessments to inform the recommended dose and regimen, following dose escalation.

BRCA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer (BROCADE3) is a phase 3 study, evaluating veliparib in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel with continuation as monotherapy if carboplatin/paclitaxel is discontinued in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation-associated, advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. The objective of the current analysis was to characterize the veliparib exposure-response relationships for efficacy (progression-free survival [PFS]) and safety in this study. Exposure-efficacy analyses of PFS were conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and cox proportional hazards (CPH) models using treatment alone or both treatment and exposure as time-dependent predictors to estimate the effect of veliparib in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and as monotherapy. The cox proportional hazards model with only treatment as the time-varying predictor estimated a statistically significant benefit of veliparib monotherapy compared to placebo monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.33-0.73) and a modest, non-statistically significant benefit (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95%CI, 0.62-1.05) of adding veliparib to carboplatin/paclitaxel. Inclusion of exposure as an additional time-varying predictor in the cox proportional hazards model indicated a flat exposure-response relationship between the veliparib exposure and PFS when veliparib was administered in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel or as monotherapy. The exposure-safety analysis did not reveal any meaningful exposure-dependent trend in the incidence of adverse events of interest. These analyses support the dose regimen of veliparib (120 mg twice daily) in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and continuation of veliparib (300-400 mg twice daily) as monotherapy if carboplatin/paclitaxel were discontinued before disease progression in this patient population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with a registration ID: NCT02163694.

Glecaprevir (GLE)/pibrentasvir (PIB) 300 mg/120 mg once daily (Mavyret/Maviret) is an all-oral, pangenotypic, interferon- and ribavirin-free combination regimen approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The objective of the current analyses was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GLE/PIB in HCV-infected Japanese patients. Data from 332 subjects enrolled in 2 Japan phase 3 trials, CERTAIN-1 and CERTAIN-2, were used in the analyses. Pharmacokinetics of GLE/PIB were characterized using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The analyses evaluated the impact of covariates (concomitant medications and demographic and clinical covariates such as renal impairment, effect of cirrhotic status) on GLE/PIB PK. GLE and PIB PK were described by 1- and 2-compartment models, respectively. Presence of cirrhosis, age, and body weight were identified as significant covariates on GLE/PIB PK. A trend toward higher GLE and PIB exposures in older patients and higher PIB exposures in heavier patients was observed; however, these increases were not considered clinically meaningful. GLE and PIB exposures were higher in HCV-infected subjects with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A; GLE area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 160% higher, and PIB area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 21% higher) compared to subjects without cirrhosis. Renal function (including subjects with end-stage renal disease with dialysis) had no impact on GLE or PIB exposures. The GLE/PIB dose was well tolerated in the Japanese population, and no dose adjustment is needed for the evaluated intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

Veliparib, a poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2 enzyme inhibitor, was administered at 120 mg twice daily (BID) for 7 days in a 21-day cycle with carboplatin/paclitaxel in the Phase 2 BROCADE study in patients with BRCA-deficient recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, a dose based on Phase 1 results. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure–response analyses were undertaken to retrospectively evaluate whether an optimal dose was used in BROCADE. A population PK analysis was performed using data from 168 patients in BROCADE along with data from 288 subjects in another 5 studies. The relationship between veliparib exposure and efficacy variables (including progression-free survival [PFS] and objective response rate [ORR]) and safety variables (selected grade 3 or greater hematological adverse events) were analyzed. Veliparib PK parameters in BROCADE were comparable to the previous studies. Creatinine clearance on veliparib apparent clearance and lean body weight on veliparib apparent volume of distribution were identified as covariates. A trend of better efficacy (PFS and ORR) in the veliparib arm compared to placebo was observed. However, veliparib exposure-efficacy response was relatively flat with higher veliparib exposures not showing better efficacy. No exposure–response relationship was observed in grade 3 or greater hematological toxicities (anemia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia). The exposure–response analysis suggested that intermittent 7-day veliparib 120 mg BID dosing in a 21-day cycle provided additional efficacy without meaningfully impacting the safety and tolerability when co-administered with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with BRCA-deficient breast cancer. A higher dose of veliparib is unlikely to provide greater benefit in this combination in patients with BRCA-deficient recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

The objective of this research was to characterize the venetoclax exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships and determine its optimal dose in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving venetoclax in combination with low intensity therapies (hypomethylating agent [HMA; azacitidine or decitabine] or low-dose cytarabine [LDAC]). A total of 212 patients from the HMA study and 92 patients from the LDAC study were included in the exposure-safety analyses. Those who received at least one dose of venetoclax and had at least one measurable response (201 and 83 in the HMA and LDAC studies, respectively) were included in the exposure-efficacy analyses. The probability of response based on International Working Group (IWG) for AML response criteria, adverse events of grade 3 or worse neutropenia or infection or a serious adverse event was modeled using logistic regression analyses to characterize the venetoclax exposure-response relationships. In combination with an HMA, increasing concentrations of venetoclax, up to those associated with a less than or equal to 400-mg once daily (QD) dose, were associated with a higher probability of response, with a trend for flat or decreasing probabilities of response thereafter. In combination with LDAC, increasing concentrations of venetoclax were associated with higher probabilities of response, with no plateau observed. Increasing concentrations of venetoclax were not associated with increasing probability of any safety event except for a slight increase in grade 3 or worse infections with HMAs; however, tolerability issues were observed at doses of greater than or equal to 800 mg QD in each study. Exposure-response analyses support the use of venetoclax 400 mg QD in combination with an HMA and 600 mg QD in combination with LDAC (ie, the next highest dose evaluated below 800 mg in each combination) to safely maximize the probability of response in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important emerging clinical end point in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The objective of this research was to develop an integrated mechanistic model to evaluate the impact of venetoclax-rituximab combination therapy on MRD kinetics. Using data from 435 patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, an integrated model was developed and validated that accounted for venetoclax dosing and pharmacokinetics, rituximab treatment, absolute lymphocyte count, and blood and bone marrow (BM) MRD data. Simulations of venetoclax-rituximab (six cycles) combination predicted the proportion (90% confidence interval) of patients with BM MRD below 10-4 to be 57% (54-61%) and 63% (59-67%) at 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. Continued venetoclax treatment to 48 months only increased the predicted rate of negative BM MRD to 66% (63-70%). These results indicate that treatment with venetoclax-rituximab combination for a finite 2-year period would nearly maximize the rate of negative BM MRD (< 10-4 ). Preliminary clinical data agree with these predictions and more long-term follow-up data are awaited to confirm the same.

The clinical development program of the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combination therapy of paritaprevir (coadministered with ritonavir) and ombitasvir, with and without dasabuvir (3-DAA [3D] and 2-DAA [2D] regimens, respectively) used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection has generated a robust dataset across various dosing regimens and patient populations. The current analysis aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics in patients without cirrhosis (‘non-cirrhotic’) and with compensated cirrhosis (‘cirrhotic’), while accounting for differences across hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GT) 1, 2, and 4, multiple regimens (3D regimen ± ribavirin for GT1 in global studies, 2D regimen for subgenotype 1b in Japan, 2D regimen + ribavirin for GT2 in Japan, and 2D regimen + ribavirin for GT4), and ethnicities. Pharmacokinetic data from nine clinical studies (~ 1850 patients) were used to model the population pharmacokinetics of each component of the DAA regimens. Model development was performed in stages, starting with an initial base model. Covariate–parameter relationships were then assessed using forward inclusion/backward elimination procedures. Model development was guided by goodness-of-fit plots, likelihood ratio tests, plausibility of parameter estimates, and knowledge of DAA, ritonavir, and ribavirin pharmacokinetics. Paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were described by a one-compartment model, while dasabuvir and ribavirin pharmacokinetics were characterized by a two-compartment model. The analysis showed generally overlapping exposures between compensated cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients or between subgroups of the identified significant covariates. The largest differences were the approximately 30–60% higher dasabuvir and paritaprevir exposures in compensated cirrhotic patients. These differences did not warrant dose adjustments for the DAAs when used in HCV-infected patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Exposure-response analyses were performed for a venetoclax monotherapy study in 106 patients with varying subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (NCT01328626). Logistic regression, time-to-event, and progression-free survival (PFS) analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between venetoclax exposure, NHL subtype and response, PFS, or occurrence of serious adverse events. Trends for small increases in the probability of response with increasing venetoclax exposures were identified, and became more evident when assessed by NHL subtype. Trends in exposure-PFS were shown for the mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) subtype, but not other subtypes. There was no increase in the probability of experiencing a serious adverse event with increasing exposure. Overall, the results indicate that venetoclax doses of 800-1200 mg as a single agent may be appropriate to maximize efficacy in MCL, follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes with no expected negative impact on safety.

The triple direct-acting antiviral (3-DAA) regimen (two co-formulated tablets of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir once daily and one tablet of dasabuvir twice daily) for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection has been reformulated for once-daily administration containing all three active DAAs (3QD regimen). Two bioequivalence studies compared the 3-DAA and 3QD regimens. In study 1, fed, single-, and multiple-dose crossover comparisons revealed exposures for drug components that were slightly outside the bioequivalence criteria, i.e., 21 to 29% lower dasabuvir C trough, paritaprevir C max, and ritonavir C max. In study 2, fed and fasted single-dose crossover comparisons demonstrated a large impact of food on exposures, confirming the product’s labeling requirement for administration only with food, and revealed a lack of bioequivalence under fasting conditions. Exposure-response analyses using efficacy data from phase 2/3 studies of the 3-DAA regimen demonstrated that the lower dasabuvir C trough for the 3QD regimen (under fed condition) would have minimal impact on sustained virologic response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12). Thus, the pharmacodynamic similarity between the regimens was established and the analyses provided the basis for regulatory approval of the 3QD regimen to treat patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection.

Context: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a group of bone marrow disorders involving cytopenia, hypercellular bone marrow, and dysplastic hematopoietic progenitors. Death is commonly caused by the effects of cytopenia, leading to infections or bleeding [1]. Finding efficacious treatment regimens in MDS remains a challenge as it involves understanding of both disease induced and treatment related cytopenias. Objective: The objective was to develop a semi-mechanistic model of disease progression in MDS based on clinical data, involving relevant hematopoietic cells that can describe the effect of drug intervention with venetoclax azacitidine combination therapy. The model was subsequently used to simulate different treatment regimens (with respect to dose, dosing duration in a cycle, and number of cycles) and compare the outcomes. Study Design and Data: Data from an ongoing Phase 1b study evaluating the safety and efficacy of venetoclax (400 mg or 800 mg for 28 days or 100 mg to 400 mg for 14 days in each 28-day cycle) with azacitidine (75 mg/m2 on days 1-7 of each cycle) in treatment-naive patients with higher-risk MDS were used for the analysis. The data contained venetoclax concentrations, neutrophil, red blood cell, and platelet count in the blood and blasts in the bone marrow. Methods: An integrated semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was developed that accounted for venetoclax PK and azacitidine treatment to describe time dynamics of neutrophils, red blood cells, and platelets. The model also included crowding in the bone marrow due to excess stem cells, MDS blasts, and progenitor cells, and its effect on hematopoiesis. Results: The model described the observed clinical data well and showed predictive ability across considered cell types. Complete remission (CR) and marrow complete remission (mCR) rates were predicted close to observed rates in the study. Simulated efficacy (recovery of blast count, CR, and mCR rates) and safety (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) endpoints are comparable to the expected outcomes from various dosing regimens. Conclusions: A model describing drug-disease interactions in MDS was developed that integrates multiple end points and differentiates disease driven from drug-induced cytopenia. Reference: [1] Dayyani, F, et al. Cause of death in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 2010 May 1; 116.9:2174-2179. Disclosures: The analysis presented was funded by AbbVie. AbbVie contributed to the design, research, and interpretation of data, writing, reviewing, and approving the publication. NT, JZ, RM, BE, JW, SM, and SG are employees of AbbVie and may hold stock. AHW receives honoraria from Novartis, Astellas, Pfizer, Macrogenics, Abbvie, Genentech, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, Astra Zeneca and Janssen. AHW also receives research funding from Novartis, Celgene, Abbvie, Servier, Astra Zeneca and Amgen. AHW is a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax. G-GM is an investigator in AbbVie funded Clinical Trials. DM is a Genentech employee and may own stock. C.M. performed the analysis at AbbVie during an internship. C.M. also receives research funding from an industry consortium (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Grunenthal GmbH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Merck KGaA and Sanofi) for the PharMetrX program

Aim To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of a triple direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen (3D) (ombitasvir, paritaprevir-ritonavir, and dasabuvir) and adjunctive ribavirin and estimate covariate effects in a broad spectrum of subjects with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. Methods Pharmacokinetic data from six phase 3 studies and one phase 2 study in subjects receiving the currently approved doses of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen for treating HCV genotype 1 infection for 12 or 24 weeks were characterized using separate population pharmacokinetic models built using each component of the regimen from non-linear mixed-effects methodology in NONMEM 7.3. In the models, demographic and clinical covariates were tested. Models were assessed via goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks, and bootstrap evaluations. Results The population pharmacokinetic models for each component of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen (DAAs and ritonavir, N = 2348) and ribavirin (N = 1841) adequately described their respective plasma-concentration-time data. Model parameter estimates were precise and robust, and all models showed good predictive performance. Significant covariate effects associated with apparent clearance and volume of distribution included age, body weight, sex, cirrhosis, HCV subtype, opioid or antidiabetic agent use, and creatinine clearance. Conclusion Population pharmacokinetics of the 3D ± ribavirin regimen components in HCV-infected patients were characterized using phase 3 and 2 HCV clinical trial data. Although several statistically significant covariates were identified, their effects were modest and not clinically meaningful to necessitate dose adjustments for any component of the 3D regimen. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Venetoclax is a selective, potent, first-in-class B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor that restores apoptosis in cancer cells and has demonstrated efficacy in a variety of hematological malignancies. The objective of this research was to characterize the relationship between venetoclax exposures and efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). A total of 272 and 338 patients from four clinical studies were pooled for the exposure–efficacy and exposure–safety analyses, respectively. Demographics, baseline disease characteristics, and select co-medications were evaluated for their impact on efficacy (lymphocytes, tumor size, objective response [OR]) and safety (neutropenia and infection). Higher venetoclax concentrations led to a more rapid decrease in lymphocyte counts and tumor size, which translated into patients more rapidly achieving OR. The 17p deletion somatic mutation was not identified, in any of the analyses, to affect the responsiveness of patients to venetoclax. Model-based simulations of lymphocyte counts and tumor size estimated an OR rate (ORR) of 84.8 % (95 % confidence interval 81.5–88.0 %) at a venetoclax dosage of 400 mg daily, with minimal increase in ORR at higher doses. The safety analyses of the adverse events (grade 3 or higher) of neutropenia and infection indicated that higher average venetoclax concentrations were not associated with an increase in adverse events. The exposure–response analyses indicated that a venetoclax dosage regimen of 400 mg daily results in a high (>80 %) probability of achieving OR in R/R CLL/SLL patients, with minimal probability of increasing neutropenia or infection with higher exposures.

The all-oral 2 direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir 25/150/100 mg once a day has been evaluated in hepatitis C virus subgenotype 1b-infected Japanese adults in the GIFT-I study. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate potential relationships between DAA exposures and laboratory abnormalities/adverse events of peripheral edema in patients in GIFT-I. The GIFT-I study consisted of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled substudy in patients without cirrhosis and an open-label substudy in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Patients received ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir for 12 weeks. Exposure–response relationships between individual components of the ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir regimen and clinical parameters of interest were explored using pharmacokinetic and clinical data from patients in the study. Graphical analyses were performed. For events that occurred in at least 10 patients (total bilirubin elevation ≥grade 2 and peripheral edema ≥grade 1), multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant relationships between predictor variables (drug exposures) and response variables (probability of adverse events or laboratory abnormalities), with consideration for the effect of potential covariates and baseline status of response variables. Data from 321 noncirrhotic and 42 compensated cirrhotic patients were analyzed. There were 14 events of peripheral edema (10 at grade 1 and 4 at grade 2) in patients who received concomitant administration of calcium channel blockers and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir. There was no apparent relationship between the incidences of peripheral edema and exposures of paritaprevir, ombitasvir, or ritonavir. There was a shallow relationship between total bilirubin elevation and exposures of paritaprevir which is an inhibitor of bilirubin transporter organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B. Based on graphical analyses, exposures of paritaprevir, ombitasvir, or ritonavir were weakly associated with hemoglobin decrease, but not associated with post baseline alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase elevations. In Japanese patients, there were no associations or only shallow relationships between DAA exposures and peripheral edema or laboratory abnormalities. Consequently, therapeutic drug monitoring is not expected to be beneficial in managing patients on the 2-DAA regimen. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02023099. AbbVie Inc.

Introduction: Venetoclax (VEN), an orally bioavailable selective BCL-2 inhibitor, was granted accelerated approval by the FDA for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). The objective of this analysis was to characterize the exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships using data from the nonrandomized Phase 1/2 studies and the confirmatory Phase 3 studies in subjects with treatment-naïve AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for VEN was characterized using data from 771 AML subjects across 5 Phase 1 - 3 studies including subjects with relapsed/refractory AML and subjects with treatment-naïve AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. PK parameters from this model were used to calculate the exposure metric, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve at steady-state (AUCss), for exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses. Logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to characterize the exposure-response relationships for overall survival, event-free survival, and conversion to post-baseline transfusion independence for red blood cells or platelets as well as key safety endpoints of treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and infections. Additionally, best overall response of complete remission (CR), CR + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), and CR + CR with partial hematological recovery (CRh) were also characterized in the exposure-response analyses. Separate analyses were performed for VEN + HMA and VEN + LDAC, including subjects taking placebo (PBO) + HMA or PBO + LDAC, respectively, to inform the intercepts. A total of 575 subjects with treatment-naïve AML were included in the exposure-response analyses for VEN + HMA and 279 subjects with treatment-naïve AML were included in the exposure-response analyses for VEN + LDAC. Results: VEN + HMA: For all efficacy endpoints studied, there was a clear trend for higher efficacy in subjects treated with VEN + HMA as compared to PBO in combination with azacitidine (AZA). When PBO patients were included, significant exposure-response relationships between VEN exposure and overall survival and event-free survival were identified, and a maximal effect (Emax) model best described the statistically significant positive relationships between VEN exposure and best overall response of CR + CRi and CR + CRh. However, there were no apparent relationships between VEN exposure and any efficacy endpoint without the inclusion of PBO subjects, suggesting that the beneficial effect of VEN is already maximized in the dose range studied (400 to 1200 mg daily [QD]). No exposure-response relationship was identified between VEN exposure and treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia or infections. An Emax model best described the statistically significant relationship between VEN exposure and treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, consistent with the clinical finding that subjects in the VEN + HMA treatment arms had higher rates of reported neutropenia than those in the PBO + AZA arm. VEN + LDAC: For all efficacy endpoints studied, there was a clear trend for higher efficacy in subjects treated with VEN + LDAC as compared to PBO + LDAC. With PBO subjects included, an Emax model best described the statistically significant relationships between VEN exposure and best overall response of CR, CR + CRi, and CR + CRh, with probability of response plateauing at exposures corresponding to 600 mg QD of VEN. There were no apparent relationships between VEN exposure and any efficacy endpoint when the PBO subjects were excluded from analysis, indicating that the beneficial effect of VEN is already maximized at 600 mg QD. Although reported rates of treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia were higher in the VEN + LDAC treatment arms as compared to PBO + LDAC, no significant exposure-response relationships were found between VEN exposure and treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or infections. Conclusion: The VEN exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses confirm the benefit of adding VEN to either HMA or LDAC and support the dose regimens of VEN 400 mg QD in combination with an HMA and VEN 600 mg QD in combination with LDAC in treatment-naïve AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Disclosures Eckert: AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Brackman:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Menon:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Salem:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Potluri:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or stock options. Smith:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Wei:AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MacroGenics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Other: former employee and receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax; Pfizer: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hayslip:Abbvie Inc: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Miles:Genentech Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mensing:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Gopalakrishnan:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Zha:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important clinical endpoint in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) because it correlates with progression free survival and overall survival. The objective of this work is to investigate the impact of venetoclax (VEN) exposures on undetectable MRD rates in blood and bone marrow (BM) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL patients receiving VEN monotherapy or combination therapy with rituximab (RTX). Data from a total of 708 patients from four VEN monotherapy studies and one combination Phase 1b study (VEN + 6-9 cycles of RTX) in R/R CLL patients were utilized to perform this analysis. The median number of prior therapies in these studies was 3, 42% of the patients had 17p chromosomal deletion and 28% had prior B-Cell Receptor inhibitor (BCRi) therapy. Blood and BM MRD assessments were available for 70% and 38%, respectively, of patients included in the analysis. Absence of an MRD measurement was assumed as detectable MRD for the purposes of this analysis. The average concentration (Cavg) of VEN was computed for each patient by fitting a population pharmacokinetic model to the observed VEN concentration data. The model was used to calculate area under the curve and compute Cavg accounting for VEN dose ramp-ups, reductions and interruptions. The relationships between venetoclax Cavg and undetectable MRD rates were assessed by using quartile plots. Logistic regression analyses were also conducted to quantify the exposure-response relationship. With VEN monotherapy, the undetectable MRD rates in blood and BM increased with the increase in VEN exposures. With VEN + RTX combination treatment, the undetectable MRD rates in blood and BM showed an increase with increasing VEN average concentration, but the benefit saturated with limited increase at exposures beyond 400mg. Logistic regression analyses indicated statistically significant (p These results demonstrate that higher venetoclax concentrations are associated with higher undetectable MRD rates in both blood and BM. When VEN is combined with RTX, an increase in VEN dose beyond 400mg is unlikely to result in higher undetectable MRD rates. Citation Format: Sathej Gopalakrishnan, Rajeev Menon, Brenda Chyla, Divya Samineni, Amanda Jacobson, Su Young Kim, Sven Mensing, Ahmed Hamed Salem. Relationship between venetoclax concentrations and undetectable MRD in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3024.

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are established as the standard of care for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. One of the newest additions to the HCV arsenal is an oral three-DAA combination therapy (i.e., the 3D regimen) that does not require concomitant use of pegylated interferon. The clinical development program for the 3D regimen has yielded a robust dataset that is inclusive of various dosing schemes and a diverse patient population. Using data from nine phase 1b/2a/2b studies that enrolled patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, population pharmacokinetic models were developed for each component of the 3D regimen (ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, and dasabuvir) and for ribavirin, an adjunctive therapy used to enhance therapeutic efficacy in some populations. Formulation effects, accumulation, relative bioavailability, and interactions between DAAs were assessed during model development, and demographic and clinical covariates were identified and evaluated for their effects on drug exposures. Proposed models were assessed via goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks, and bootstrap evaluations. Population pharmacokinetic models adequately described their respective plasma concentration-time data with precise and reliable model parameter estimates and with good predictive performance. Covariates, including age, sex, body weight, cytochrome P450 2C8 inhibitor use, non-Hispanic ethnicity, and creatinine clearance, were associated with apparent clearance and/or apparent volume parameters; however, the magnitude of effect on drug exposure was modest and not considered to be clinically significant. No patient-related or clinical parameters were identified that would necessitate dose adjustment of the 3D regimen in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection.

Background The three drug direct-acting antiviral regimen (3D regimen) of ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir, with and without ribavirin, was evaluated in one Phase II trial and six Phase III trials in over 2,300 HCV genotype-1-infected patients. Patients continued taking their protocol-permitted co-medications while receiving the 3D ± ribavirin regimen. The effects of the co-medications on exposures of the 3D regimen and ribavirin were examined. Methods Population pharmacokinetic model-predicted steady-state area under the curve (AUC24,ss) values were evaluated in the presence/absence of the co-medications. Interactions resulting in a greater than 50% reduction or 100% increase in an AUC24,ss value were examined as covariates for an effect on apparent clearance (CL/F). Results More than 1,200 co-medications belonging to 15 drug classes and/or 19 enzyme and transporter inhibitor and/or inducer categories were used concomitantly with the 3D regimen in the trials. Approximately 1,500 patients (65%) in Phase III trials received two or more co-medications from multiple drug classes or categories. No co-medication class/category decreased or increased ombitasvir, dasabuvir, ritonavir or ribavirin AUC24ss by more than half or twofold, respectively. Opioids, antipsychotics, anti-epileptics, antidiabetics and non-ethinyl estradiol-containing hormone replacement therapies appeared to have an effect (AUC24ss ratio ≤0.5 or ≥2.0) on paritaprevir exposures. However, when these classes were included in the paritaprevir population pharmacokinetic model, only opioids and antidiabetics had a statistically significant effect on CL/F, but with no clinically meaningful increase in exposures (≤55%). Conclusions No dose adjustment is necessary for the 3D + ribavirin regimen when used with the co-medications included in this analysis as there were no clinically meaningful effects on exposures of the DAAs.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is of considerable clinical concern in Japan. We modeled the population pharmacokinetics of an oral interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) regimen (i.e., the 2D regimen) recently approved for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 infection as a new option for affected Japanese patients. Using data from a phase III clinical trial (GIFT-I) that enrolled Japanese patients with HCV genotype 1b infection, population pharmacokinetic models were developed for the drugs that comprise the 2D regimen: paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and ritonavir. Demographic and clinical covariates with potential to influence 2D pharmacokinetics were evaluated for their effects on drug exposures. Proposed models were assessed using goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks, and bootstrap evaluations. One-compartment models with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described the population pharmacokinetics of paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and ritonavir. On average, patients with cirrhosis had approximately 95–145 % higher, 19–24 % lower, and 58–68 % higher exposures of paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and ritonavir, respectively. Female patients had 58–81 % higher ombitasvir exposures, whereas patients with mild renal impairment (creatinine clearance 75 mL/min) had 9–14 % higher ombitasvir exposures than did patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance 105 mL/min). The DAA exposure values were comparable between responders and non-responders. Population pharmacokinetic modeling did not reveal any patient-related or clinical parameters that would require dose adjustment of the 2D regimen when used for the treatment of HCV genotype 1b infection in Japanese patients.

Ombitasvir, paritaprevir (given with low-dose ritonavir), and dasabuvir are direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) used with or without ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of renal function as determined by creatinine clearance (CrCL) on the pharmacokinetics of the DAAs, ritonavir, and ribavirin in HCV genotype 1-infected patients with or without cirrhosis. Total exposure, measured by area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC), was generated for the DAAs, ritonavir, and ribavirin using population pharmacokinetic modeling of data (N = 2093 patients) from 6 Phase 3 studies and 1 Phase 2 study. The effect of CrCL on the AUC values of each DAA, ritonavir, and ribavirin was separately evaluated and adjusted for any significant patient-specific covariates including, age, sex, body weight, cirrhosis, and Asian race in multiple linear regression analysis. Using the final models, AUC values were predicted for patients with normal renal function (CrCL = 105 mL/min), mild renal impairment (CrCL = 75 mL/min) and moderate renal impairment (CrCL = 45 mL/min). CrCL was not a statistically significant predictor of DAA or ritonavir AUC values. Age, sex, and cirrhosis were significant covariates for the AUC values of all the DAAs and body weight was a significant covariate for the AUC values of ombitasvir and dasabuvir. Asian race was significant only for dasabuvir. Only age and sex were statistically significant predictors for the AUC values of ritonavir. CrCL showed a significant relationship with the ribavirin AUC values, consistent with ribavirin’s renal excretion. Age, sex, body weight, and cirrhosis were also significant covariates for the AUC values of ribavirin. The DAA and ritonavir AUC values were comparable (≤10 % difference) among different levels of renal function, while ribavirin AUC values were up to 17 % higher in mild/moderate renal impairment compared with normal renal function. No dose adjustments are needed for the 3D regimen in HCV genotype-1 infected patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Ribavirin doses should be adjusted for renal impairment as recommended in the ribavirin label.

The three-direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combination regimen of ombitasvir, paritaprevir (coadministered with ritonavir [paritaprevir/ritonavir], and dasabuvir (the 3D regimen) ± ribavirin for treatment of HCV genotype 1-infected patients demonstrated efficacy and safety in Phase II and Phase III clinical trials. The relationships between the steady-state exposure (area under the concentration-time curve at steady state and trough concentration at steady state) of the three DAAs and ribavirin with sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) following administration of the 3D regimen in six Phase II/III studies were examined. HCV non-cirrhotic genotype 1-infected adult male and female patients (N = 1690) enrolled in the one Phase II study or one of the five Phase III studies were included for graphical analysis. HCV subgenotype 1a-infected patients who received the 3D regimen with ribavirin (approved regimen for that patient population) (N = 615) from the same studies were included in the multivariate logistic regression exposure-response analysis. Graphical analysis suggested a shallow trend between exposure and % SVR12 for paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and ribavirin exposure but not for dasabuvir exposure. After adjusting for covariate effects, the exposure-response logistic-regression analysis indicated that ombitasvir exposure was the single significant predictor, demonstrating a 1 % change in SVR12 with up to 25 % change in ombitasvir exposure at steady state. The results of these analyses indicate that the doses selected for the 3D regimen were optimal, achieving high SVR12 rates across the range of exposures observed in the Phase III studies.

Paritaprevir is a direct-acting antiviral agent that is a component of approved multidrug regimens used in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A population pharmacokinetic model for paritaprevir was developed using data from formulation, bioavailability, and drug-drug interaction studies that evaluated the pharmacokinetics of paritaprevir (coadministered with ritonavir to enhance exposure) with or without ombitasvir and/or dasabuvir at different paritaprevir dose levels.A non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach was applied to data from 12 phase I, single- and multiple-dose studies that enrolled a total of 369 healthy volunteers. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, body weight, body surface area, body mass index, and baseline creatinine clearance were evaluated as covariates during model development. In addition, the influences of dose, formulation, and concomitant medications (e.g. ombitasvir and dasabuvir) on paritaprevir bioavailability were included in the model.A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination optimally described paritaprevir plasma concentration-time data. Paritaprevir bioavailability was formulation- and dose-dependent, and increased supraproportionally. The accumulation of paritaprevir was 1.57-fold on repeated dosing compared with the first dose. Coadministration of dasabuvir increased paritaprevir bioavailability by 59 %; however, ombitasvir coadministration did not affect the pharmacokinetic profile of paritaprevir. No subject-specific covariate influenced the paritaprevir pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic model was robust in bootstrap evaluations and was consistent with observed data based on diagnostic goodness-of-fit plots and visual predictive checks.The complex pharmacokinetics of paritaprevir were well described by the model, which can be used as a basis for clinical trial dosing and further evaluations in patients with HCV.

Introduction: Venetoclax, a selective BCL2 inhibitor, is approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in patients who received at least one prior therapy and is being studied in several other hematological malignancies including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The objective of this analysis was to characterize the exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships of venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed AML who are not eligible for standard anthracycline-based induction therapy treated with venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (HMA) either azacitidine or decitabine, or low dose cytarabine (LDAC) to inform dose selection. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model for venetoclax was developed using data from 336 AML subjects. Post hoc pharmacokinetic parameters generated from the model were used to calculate the exposure metric, steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCss), in the exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses. Multivariate cumulative logistic regression analyses were performed using efficacy and safety data. In total, for the venetoclax plus HMA combination, 201 subjects were included in the exposure-efficacy and 212 subjects were included in the exposure-safety analyses. For the venetoclax plus LDAC combination, 83 subjects were included in the exposure-efficacy and 92 subjects were included in the exposure-safety analyses. Predictions based on the exposure-response model parameter estimates were used to explore the exposure- and dose-response relationships and select the optimal venetoclax dose. Results: Venetoclax in Combination with HMAs: Simulations indicated that venetoclax dosage of 400 mg once daily (QD) in combination with HMAs maximizes the probability of a typical subject achieving a response of complete remission (CR).. Venetoclax exposure-response relationship was similar for both azacitidine and decitabine combination (P > 0.05). For exposure-safety analyses, only treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 infections showed a statistically significant relationship with venetoclax exposures in combination with HMAs across the tested venetoclax dose range (400 - 1200 mg QD). The probability of occurrence of treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 infections at venetoclax dose of 400 mg and 800 mg was 51% (95% CI: [43, 58%]) and 59% (95% CI: [50, 66%]), respectively. Venetoclax in Combination with LDAC: A statistically significant association of best responses was determined with increasing steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCss). Based on the tolerability data, the probability of achieving CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) or better, and CR was predicted for doses up to 600 mg. The predicted probability of achieving CRi or better was approximately 46% (95% CI: [37, 55%]) and 55% (95% CI: [45 - 66%]) at exposures associated with the 400 mg and 600 mg dosage regimen given once daily, respectively. Conclusions: The venetoclax exposure- efficacy and exposure-safety analyses supported the 400 mg QD dosage regimen of venetoclax in combination with the HMAs and 600 mg QD dosage regimen of venetoclax in combination with LDAC in treatment naïve AML patients who are ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy. Disclosures Agarwal: AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gopalakrishnan:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mensing:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Potluri:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hayslip:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Friedel:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Menon:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Salem:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Navitoclax is a first-in-class, orally bioavailable, targeted Bcl-2 family protein inhibitor and promotes apoptosis. Thrombocytopenia is a primary dose-limiting toxicity of navitoclax which exhibited a distinct time profile in circulating platelets from that caused by traditional chemotherapies. A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was developed to describe the pharmacokinetic of navitoclax as well as the time course of the platelet counts in cancer patients receiving navitoclax. Data from 256 patients who received oral navitoclax (dose range 10–475 mg) as a 14/21-day schedule or a continuous once daily (QD) schedule were used to construct the model using NONMEM. The PK model was a two-compartmental model with a lag-time and a transit compartment in absorption. The PD model was a semi-physiological model that comprised a progenitor cell compartment, three transition compartments representing the maturation chain in the bone marrow and a peripheral blood compartment. Compared with the previously published models, the model established in this analysis applied a different feedback mechanism and introduced a new concept of progenitor cell “pool”, which describes a large pool of platelet progenitor cells at the beginning of navitoclax treatment. The PD model was able to describe a slight downward trend of platelet counts over the long-term navitoclax treatment as observed in around 8 % of the patients and the initial drop in platelets seen in our Phase 1/2a studies. We have developed a new semi-physiological platelet model for describing fast drop of platelets after initial navitoclax administration and long-term decline of platelets after continuous administration of navitoclax.

Venetoclax is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable, small molecule, B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl–2) inhibitor that restores apoptosis in cancer cells. Clinical efficacy of venetoclax has been observed in a variety of hematological malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). The objective of this research was to characterize the relationship between venetoclax exposures and efficacy in relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) subjects, as well as safety in R/R CLL/SLL and NHL subjects. A total of 272 and 444 subjects from 4 clinical studies were included in the exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses, respectively. Characteristics evaluated for their impact on efficacy and safety included: demographics (bodyweight, sex, etc.), baseline disease characteristics (e.g. lymphocyte count, tumor size, 17p del somatic mutation), and select co-medications. Model based simulations indicated that a venetoclax dosage of 400 mg daily maximized the probability of a typical subject with R/R CLL/SLL achieving an objective response (OR) by 6 months of venetoclax treatment with estimated OR rates of 80.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [77.5% - 84.0%]), 84.8% (95% CI: [81.5% - 88.0%]), and 85.5% (95% CI: [82.6% - 88.4%]) at the 200, 400, and 600 mg dosage regimens, respectively. The 17p deletion was not identified in any of the exposure-efficacy analyses to be related to the responsiveness of R/R CLL/SLL subjects to venetoclax. Therefore, subjects with the 17p deletion chromosomal aberration appear to be as sensitive to the effects of venetoclax as subjects who do not have the 17p deletion, consistent with its Bcl-2 inhibitor mechanism of action that bypasses the signaling events associated with the 17p deletion. The safety analyses of the adverse events (Grade ≥ 3) of neutropenia and infection in R/R CLL/SLL and NHL subjects both indicated that higher average venetoclax concentrations were associated with a decrease in adverse events, indicating that these evaluated safety endpoints are not dose-limiting. Sensitivity analyses supported that increasing venetoclax concentration did not increase these adverse events. It is hypothesized that the association is driven by disease improvement with venetoclax treatment and not by directly affecting neutrophils or granulocyte progenitor cells. Overall, the exposure-response-safety analyses indicated that a venetoclax dosage regimen of 400 mg daily maximizes (>80%) the probability of achieving objective response in R/R CLL/SLL subjects with minimal probability of neutropenia or infection. Citation Format: Kevin J. Freise, Aksana K. Jones, Doerthe Eckert, Sven Mensing, Shekman Wong, Rod Humerickhouse, Walid Awni, Ahmed H. Salem. Relationship of venetoclax dose and exposure to response in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subjects. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2045.

P0820 PHARMACOKINETICS OF PARITAPREVIR, OMBITASVIR, DASABUVIR, RITONAVIR AND RIBAVIRIN IN SUBJECTS WITH HCV GENOTYPE 1 INFECTION IN PHASE 3 STUDIES S. Mensing, S. Sharma, D. Eckert, A. Polepally, A. Khatri, T. Podsadecki, W. Awni, R. Menon, S. Dutta. AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany; Former AbbVie employee, AbbVie, North Chicago, United States E-mail: sven.mensing@abbvie.com