Search

Background: Despite a strong association between nutritional indices and disease prognosis, evidence regarding the evaluation of nutritional indices after preoperative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is insufficient. We evaluated the clinical significance of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with resectable (R‐) and borderline resectable (BR‐) PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by pancreatic resection. Methods: We assessed 153 patients with R‐ and BR‐PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative resection between 2009 and 2022. We evaluated the association between preoperative PNI after NACRT and short‐ and long‐term outcomes. Results: The median preoperative PNI value after NACRT was 42.1, and the optimal cutoff value from the time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curve was 38.6. The low PNI group (PNI < 38.6, n = 44) exhibited significantly worse inflammatory parameters, surgical outcomes, and prognoses than the high PNI group (PNI ≥ 38.6, n = 109). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative PNI ≤ 38.6 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00–5.38, p =.049), blood loss ≥1642 mL (HR: 3.05, 95% CI: 1.65–5.64, p <.001), node positive pathology (HR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.32–3.34, p =.002), and lack of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 3.55, 95% CI: 2.05–6.15, p <.001) as significant predictors of overall survival. Conclusions: For patients with R‐ and BR‐PDAC receiving preoperative treatment, it is imperative to closely monitor their nutritional status when determining the optimal surgical procedure timing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: KRAS, P16, TP53, and SMAD4/DPC4 mutations are common in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The study aimed to evaluate the association between gene mutations in pre‐treatment endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) samples and clinical outcomes of patients with PDAC. Methods: There were 43 patients with resectable (R) PDAC and 41 patients with borderline resectable (BR) PDAC. CDKN2A/p16, TP53, and SMAD4/DPC4 were evaluated through immunohistochemistry (IHC) of pretreatment EUS‐FNA (n = 84) and resected specimens (n = 71). All patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Results: IHC of EUS‐FNA specimens revealed p16 loss in 61 (73%), abnormal p53 in 61 (73%), and Smad4 loss in 38 (45%) patients. Abnormal p53 was associated with a lower resection rate (p =.017). Abnormal p53 and Smad4 loss were associated with recurrence within 6 months post‐pancreatectomy (p =.03, p =.03, respectively). Univariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to reveal that abnormal p53 (p =.07), p16 loss and abnormal p53 (p =.04), and Smad4 and p16 loss (p =.03) were associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions: Pre‐treatment abnormal labeling of p53 in EUS‐FNA specimen was associated with a lower resection rate and an early recurrence in R or BR PDAC cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies for pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is reported in recent years, ideal neoadjuvant treatment for patients with potentially resectable (R) PDAC remains uncertain. We conducted the retrospective study about the effect of short-term neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (sNACRT) on R PDAC. The 94 patients received curative intent pancreatectomy for R PDAC between 2000 and 2016. Among them, 31 patients received sNACRT (S1 60 mg/m2/day for 2w and RTx 30 Gy/2w). Clinical outcomes of the 31 patients with sNACRT were analyzed in comparison with 63 patients without sNACRT. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93, 71, and 62% in the patients with sNACRT and 78, 35, and 26% in the patients without sNACRT (P = .0007), respectively. Lymph node metastasis was found in 41.9% of patients with sNACRT and 56.5% of patients without sNACRT (P = .09). Microscopic tumor infiltration at resection margins (R1) was found in no patient with sNACRT and 5 patients (7.9%) without sNACRT (P=.042). Retropancreatic infiltration (P = .04), lymphatic invasion (P = .002), plexus invasion (P = .042), and main pancreatic duct extension (P = .004) were significantly fewer in patients with sNACRT than the patients without sNACRT. The recurrences were found in 64% of patients with sNACRT (39% distant, 16% local, and 10% mix pattern) and 68% in patients without sNACRT (28% distant, 21% local, and 19% mix pattern). The recurrence patterns were significantly different (P = .008) between the groups. Short-term neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy decreased R1 resection rate and improved OS. Short-term neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide ideal local control during the short term and improve clinical outcome of R PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Purpose: In the present study we aimed to prospectively assess the current prevalence and risk factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after total pancreatectomy (TP). Methods: Between August 2015 and December 2017, we prospectively collected data from 68 Japanese centers on 148 consecutive patients who underwent TP whose computed tomography (CT) attenuation values were evaluated for 12 months. We defined post‐TP NAFLD as a liver parenchyma CT value of less than 40 Hounsfield units (HU). Data on perioperative variables were retrieved from all patients and evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the perioperative risk factors of NAFLD. Results: In this prospective cohort study, supplementation of pancreatic exocrine enzymes was provided to all 148 patients, and 97% of them were treated with high‐titer pancrelipase (median dosage: 1800 mg) postoperatively. Indeed, 29 patients (19.6%) developed NAFLD within a year after TP. Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex (P =.002), higher body mass index (BMI) (P =.001), and postoperative diarrhea (P =.038) were independent risk factors for post‐TP NAFLD. However, post‐TP NAFLD ameliorated in 11 patients (37.9%) at 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Among patients with risk factors such as female sex, higher BMI, and postoperative diarrhea, attention should be paid to the occurrence of NAFLD after TP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]