Search

There are more than 260 million people of Slavic descent worldwide, who reside mainly in Eastern Europe but also represent a noticeable share of the population in the USA and Canada. Slavic populations, particularly Eastern Slavs and some Western Slavs, demonstrate a surprisingly high degree of genetic homogeneity, and, consequently, remarkable contribution of recurrent alleles associated with hereditary diseases. Along with pan-European pathogenic variants with clearly elevated occurrence in Slavic people (e.g., ATP7B c.3207C>A and PAH c.1222C>T), there are at least 52 pan-Slavic germ-line mutations (e.g., NBN c.657_661del and BRCA1 c.5266dupC) as well as several disease-predisposing alleles characteristic of the particular Slavic communities (e.g., Polish SDHD c.33C>A and Russian ARSB c.1562G>A variants). From a clinical standpoint, Slavs have some features of a huge founder population, thus providing a unique opportunity for efficient genetic studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Interferon I (IFN I) signaling hyperactivation is considered one of the most important pathogenetic mechanisms in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Early manifestation and more severe SLE courses in children suggest a stronger genetic influence in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Aim: To evaluate IFN-I score and SLE-associated genetic variants in cSLE. Material and Methods: 80 patients with cSLE were included in the study. IFN I-score was assessed by real-time PCR quantitation of 5 IFN I-regulated transcripts (IFI44L, IFI44, IFIT3, LY6E, MXA1) in 60 patients. Clinical exome sequencing (CES) was performed in 51 patients. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 32 patients with negative results of CES. Results: 46/60 patients (77%) had elevated IFN-I scores. Leucopenia and skin involvement were associated with over-expression of IFI44 and IFI44L, while hypocomplementemia—with hyperactivation of IFIT3, LY6E, and MX1. No correlation of IFN-I score with disease activity was found. At least one rare genetic variant, potentially associated with SLE, was found in 29 (56.9%) patients. The frequency of any SLE-genetic variants in patients with increased IFN scores was 84%, in patients with normal IFN scores—33%, and in the group whose IFN score was not assessed was 65% (p = 0.040). The majority of genetic variants (74%) are functionally related to nucleic acid sensing and IFN-signaling. The highest frequency of genetic variants was observed in Sakha patients (9/14; 64.3%); three and two unrelated patients had identical variants in PTPN22 and TREX1 genes, respectively. Conclusions: More than half of patients with childhood-onset SLE have rare variants in SLE-associated genes. The IFN-I score could be considered a tool for the selection of patients for further genetic assessment in whom monogenic lupus is suspected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations occur in a significant number of unselected ovarian cancer (OC) patients, thus making a noticeable contribution to OC morbidity. It is of interest whether CHEK2, which is frequently regarded as a third breast cancer specific gene, is also relevant to ovarian cancer pathogenesis. In this report we analyzed the presence of CHEK2 1100 delC founder mutation in 268 randomly recruited OC patients. The mutation was identified in 2 women with OC (0.8%) as compared to 1/448 (0.2%) healthy middle-aged and 0/373 elderly tumour-free women. Taken together this result and the negative findings of two other published reports on an association of CHEK2 with ovarian cancer indicate that there is no justification for intensive ovarian cancer screening in CHEK2 1100 delC carriers.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the clinical and laboratory features and MEFV allele distribution in Crimean Tatar familial Mediterranean fever patients and to compare them with Turkish familial Mediterranean fever patients and healthy controls. Materials and Methods: All newly diagnosed familial Mediterranean fever patients with Crimean Tatar nationality (n = 18) in Children's Regional Hospital in Simferopol were enrolled in the study and were compared to 40 familial Mediterranean fever cases followed up at Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. The distribution of MEFV alleles was assessed in the 127 unrelated healthy Crimean Tatar adults aged 20 years or more from different parts of the Crimea peninsula. Results: Age and gender distribution, the frequency of colchicine resistance, and colchicine intolerance were similar between Turkish and Crimean Tatar children with familial Mediterranean fever. The duration of familial Mediterranean fever attack was shorter in Turkish patients than in Crimean Tatar (2.0 vs. 3.0 days, P < .001). Chest pain was more frequent in Turkish familial Mediterranean fever patients, whereas arthralgia, arthritis, and erysipeloid rash were more common in Crimean TatarT. MEFV allele distribution in Crimean Tatar was M694V-81%, M680I and V726A 9.5% both, and 68.6%, 14.3%, and 12.9% in Turkish, consequently. Homozygous carriers were 11%, compound-heterozygous was 6%, and heterozygous was 83%, compared to Turkish being 45%, 30%, and 25%, respectively. The allele distribution in healthy Crimean Tatar and Turkish was 10.2% and M694V was 7.1%, M680I was 1.6%, and V726A was 1.6%. Conclusion: The similar MEFV allele prevalence in both populations suggests the high prevalence of familial Mediterranean fever and the high number of undiagnosed patients in the Crimea peninsula. Younger age at onset, shorter duration of attacks, the prevalence of articular involvement, and erysipeloid rash were distinctive features of familial Mediterranean fever in Crimean Tatar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background A significant portion of ovarian cancer (OC) cases is caused by germ-line mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. BRCA testing is cheap in populations with founder effect and therefore recommended for all patients with OC diagnosis. Recurrent mutations constitute the vast majority of BRCA defects in Russia, however their impact in OC morbidity has not been yet systematically studied. Furthermore, Russian population is characterized by a relatively high frequency of CHEK2 and NBS1 (NBN) heterozygotes, but it remains unclear whether these two genes contribute to the OC risk. Methods The study included 354 OC patients from 2 distinct, geographically remote regions (290 from North-Western Russia (St.-Petersburg) and 64 from the south of the country (Krasnodar)). DNA samples were tested by allele-specific PCR for the presence of 8 founder mutations (BRCA1 5382insC, BRCA1 4153delA, BRCA1 185delAG, BRCA1 300T>G, BRCA2 6174delT, CHEK2 1100delC, CHEK2 IVS2+1G>A, NBS1 657del5). In addition, literature data on the occurrence of BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and NBS1 mutations in non-selected ovarian cancer patients were reviewed. Results BRCA1 5382insC allele was detected in 28/290 (9.7%) OC cases from the North-West and 11/64 (17.2%) OC patients from the South of Russia. In addition, 4 BRCA1 185delAG, 2 BRCA1 4153delA, 1 BRCA2 6174delT, 2 CHEK2 1100delC and 1 NBS1 657del5 mutation were detected. 1 patient from Krasnodar was heterozygous for both BRCA1 5382insC and NBS1 657del5 variants. Conclusion Founder BRCA1 mutations, especially BRCA1 5382insC variant, are responsible for substantial share of OC morbidity in Russia, therefore DNA testing has to be considered for every OC patient of Russian origin. Taken together with literature data, this study does not support the contribution of CHEK2 in OC risk, while the role of NBS1 heterozygosity may require further clarification.

Abstract Although the probability of both parents being affected by BRCA1 mutations is not negligible, such families have not been systematically described in the literature. Here we present a large breast-ovarian cancer family, where 3 sisters and 1 half-sister inherited maternal BRCA1 5382insC mutation while the remaining 2 sisters carried paternal BRCA1 1629delC allele. No BRCA1 homozygous mutations has been detected, that is consistent with the data on lethality of BRCA1 knockout mice. This report exemplifies that the identification of a single cancer-predisposing mutation within the index patient may not be sufficient in some circumstances. Ideally, all family members affected by breast or ovarian tumor disease have to be subjected to the DNA testing, and failure to detect the mutation in any of them calls for the search of the second cancer-associated allele.