Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a chronic, impairing condition that affects between 1–4% of children and adolescents (Zohar, 1999). Its presentation is characterized by the presence of obsessions (i.e., recurrent, intrusive and typically distressing thoughts, ideas, or mental images) and compulsions (i.e., repetitive behaviors or mental acts designed to prevent, mitigate or attenuate anxiety) that yield substantial distress and functional impairment (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). The importance of early intervention has been emphasized (American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1998; Geller, 2006), especially given that as many as 80% of adult OCD cases have an onset during childhood (Millet et al., 2004) and childhood OCD is itself associated with significant multi-domain impairment (Piacentini, Bergman, Keller, & McCracken, 2003). Although pharmacological and psychosocial treatments have yielded promising results (Lewin, Storch, Geffken, Goodman, & Murphy, 2006), many youngsters fail to benefit from these interventions (Barrett, Farrell, Pina, Peris, & Piacentini, 2008). Indeed, in the largest clinical trial to date, only 39% of youth with OCD entered remission following cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; Pediatric OCD Treatment Study, 2004) and only 54% entered remission following combined CBT and pharmacotherapy. Thus, efforts have turned toward understanding factors that may influence treatment outcome for youth with OCD (Lewin & Piacentini, 2009). There are a number of features (e.g., comorbidity, symptom severity, poor insight) that may explain why certain youth with OCD fail to benefit from CBT (Lewin, Storch, Adkins, Murphy, & Geffken, 2005). Although current diagnostic criteria for OCD in adults requires patient recognition that the obsessions and compulsions are excessive and unreasonable (APA 2000), experts have noted that it is not uncommon for patients to lack insight into the bizarre or excessive nature of their thoughts and behaviors (Carmin, Wiegartz, & Wu, 2008; (Foa, Kozak, Goodman, Hollander, Jenike, & Rasmussen, 1995; Kozak & Foa, 1994). It is estimated that as many as 36% of adults with OCD have poor insight (Alonso et al., 2008). The degree to which a patient possesses insight into the irrational nature of his/her obsessional beliefs and compulsive rituals may contribute to both clinical presentation and treatment outcome (Bellino, Patria, Ziero, & Bogetto, 2005; Catapano, Sperandeo, Perris, Lanzaro, & Maj, 2001; Kozak et al., 1994; Vogel, Hansen, Stiles, & Gotestam, 2006). Several studies have examined correlates of insight among adults with OCD. Poor insight has been associated with increased OCD symptom severity (Bellino et al., 2005; Catapano et al., 2001; Ravi Kishore, Samar, Janardhan Reddy, Chandrasekhar, & Thennarasu, 2004) and psychiatric comorbidity (Bellino et al., 2005; Ravi Kishore et al., 2004). Other studies suggest that diminished insight is related to longer duration of illness, early onset of symptoms (Kishore et al., 2004), chronic course and increased family history of OCD (Bellino et al., 2005). Others studies have demonstrated that patients with worse insight (1) endorsed greater symptoms of depression and anxiety, (2) were more likely to have a comorbid depressive disorder, and (3) were less likely to resist obsessive and compulsive symptoms (Alonso et al., 2008; Turksoy, Tukel, Ozdemir, & Karali, 2002). One analysis, conducted by Matgunga et al. (2001), found that limited insight was linked to specific OCD symptoms (washing and checking compulsions) (Matsunaga et al., 2002). Studies also suggest that poor insight might contribute to failed responses to CBT and SRI treatment (Alonso et al., 2008; Basoglu, Lax, Kasvikis, & Marks, 1988; Catapano et al., 2001; Erzegovesi et al., 2001; Foa, 1979; Foa et al., 1983; Lax, Basoglu, & Marks, 1992; Neziroglu, Stevens, McKay, & Yaryura-Tobias, 2001; Salkovskis & Warwick, 1985; Shetti et al., 2005). Despite these findings, clinical correlates of insight among youth with OCD remain understudied. Unlike diagnostic requirements for adults with OCD, intact insight into obsessive-compulsive symptoms is not required for a diagnosis of childhood OCD (APA, 2000); however, youngsters can be diagnosed with the qualifier, “with poor insight” as needed (APA, 2000, pg 463). However, to date, the development of insight across different age groups is not documented. It is plausible that insight develops with age, consistent with higher-order cognitive processes such as abstract reasoning (Indelder & Piaget, 1958). Notably, insight into OC symptoms likely falls on a continuum (Insel & Akiskal, 1986), with severe deficits often bearing resemblance to delusional beliefs associated with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (Rodowski, Cagande, & Riddle, 2008). Whereas clinical observation indicates that most children and adolescents have reasonable level of awareness that their symptoms are unusual and excessive, there are a subset of youth with OCD who deny that their symptoms are problematic or unreasonable (Geller, 2006). These youth often experience difficulties with CBT and outcomes may be diminished (Lewin et al., 2006; Storch et al., 2008a; Storch et al., 2008b). To date, only one other study has examined correlates of insight among youth with OCD (Storch et al., 2008b). The authors dichotomized youth into two groups (high and low insight) based on and Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) item 11, a clinician-rated assessment of the child’s insight (Scahill et al., 1997). Children with low insight had higher levels of OCD symptom severity and had more repeating compulsions. Parents rated children with low insight as having more internalizing symptoms and reported higher levels of family accommodation compared to parents of youth with high insight. Although one might expect insight to improve with age, no group differences in age. Similarly, despite (or gender and comorbidity) were identified. Jensen and colleagues (1996) listed demographics, IQ, externalizing/internalizing symptoms, OCD-spectrum severity, parental psychopathology, and family functioning as factors for conceptualizing child psychiatric treatment outcomes (Jensen et al., 1996). Although Storch et al. (2008b) evaluated many of these factors, relations between insight and child intellectual functioning, perceived control, parental psychopathology, and other demographic characteristics that have been shown to relate to treatment outcome (e.g., family history, duration of OCD illness) remain unstudied. This is unfortunate given adult studies suggesting increased insight may bolster treatment outcome. Building on this work, the present study aimed to provide an initial examination of insight with regard to cognitive and developmental factors. First, we examined the relationship of insight to intellectual functioning and perceived control. In addition, we were also interested in providing an initial, albeit cross-sectional description of insight across age groups. Finally, we aimed to provide the initial replication of findings by Storch et al. (2008b) examining differences in insight across demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, adaptive functioning, and psychiatric comorbidity. We hypothesized that higher intellectual functioning and older age would predict higher insight. Based on the limited extant literature in this area, we also hypothesized that youth with poor insight would be younger, have a longer duration of illness, greater family history of OCD, increased OCD symptom severity, greater likelihood of psychiatric comorbidity, and lower adaptive functioning.