Search

Supplementary Table 4: List of cell lines evaluated for sensitivity to SHP099 (Tab 1) or an RTK-inhibitor (Tab 2) in 2D or 3D. Included is the lineage and the KRAS mutation status. Where data are blank, no viable data was available, or the cell line did not grow appropriately as a tumor spheroid.

In vivo efficacy of SHP099 (100 mg/kg, daily) in the KYSE-520 esophageal cancer cell line model. Data are plotted as the treatment mean {plus minus} s.e.m (n=7) ( (B-I) In vivo efficacy data for cell line models represented in Fig. 3E. SHP099 and trametinib were orally administered at the doses, schedules and for the duration indicated. Data are plotted as the treatment mean {plus minus} s.e.m.

Supplementary Material and Methods. File contains the following: Transcriptome sequencing and analysis, Soft agar assay, 2D and 3D Cell proliferation screen and compound characterization information.

Purpose: SHP2 inhibitors offer an appealing and novel approach to inhibit receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling, which is the oncogenic driver in many tumors or is frequently feedback activated in response to targeted therapies including RTK inhibitors and MAPK inhibitors. We seek to evaluate the efficacy and synergistic mechanisms of combinations with a novel SHP2 inhibitor, TNO155, to inform their clinical development. Experimental Design: The combinations of TNO155 with EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi), BRAFi, KRASG12Ci, CDK4/6i, and anti–programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody were tested in appropriate cancer models in vitro and in vivo, and their effects on downstream signaling were examined. Results: In EGFR-mutant lung cancer models, combination benefit of TNO155 and the EGFRi nazartinib was observed, coincident with sustained ERK inhibition. In BRAFV600E colorectal cancer models, TNO155 synergized with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors by blocking ERK feedback activation by different RTKs. In KRASG12C cancer cells, TNO155 effectively blocked the feedback activation of wild-type KRAS or other RAS isoforms induced by KRASG12Ci and greatly enhanced efficacy. In addition, TNO155 and the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib showed combination benefit in a large panel of lung and colorectal cancer patient–derived xenografts, including those with KRAS mutations. Finally, TNO155 effectively inhibited RAS activation by colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, which is critical for the maturation of immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophages, and showed combination activity with anti–PD-1 antibody. Conclusions: Our findings suggest TNO155 is an effective agent for blocking both tumor-promoting and immune-suppressive RTK signaling in RTK- and MAPK-driven cancers and their tumor microenvironment. Our data provide the rationale for evaluating these combinations clinically.

KRAS, an oncogene mutated in nearly one third of human cancers, remains a pharmacologic challenge for direct inhibition except for recent advances in selective inhibitors targeting the G12C variant. Here, we report that selective inhibition of the protein tyrosine phosphatase, SHP2, can impair the proliferation of KRAS-mutant cancer cells in vitro and in vivo using cell line xenografts and primary human tumors. In vitro, sensitivity of KRAS-mutant cells toward the allosteric SHP2 inhibitor, SHP099, is not apparent when cells are grown on plastic in 2D monolayer, but is revealed when cells are grown as 3D multicellular spheroids. This antitumor activity is also observed in vivo in mouse models. Interrogation of the MAPK pathway in SHP099-treated KRAS-mutant cancer models demonstrated similar modulation of p-ERK and DUSP6 transcripts in 2D, 3D, and in vivo, suggesting a MAPK pathway–dependent mechanism and possible non-MAPK pathway–dependent mechanisms in tumor cells or tumor microenvironment for the in vivo efficacy. For the KRASG12C MIAPaCa-2 model, we demonstrate that the efficacy is cancer cell intrinsic as there is minimal antiangiogenic activity by SHP099, and the effects of SHP099 is recapitulated by genetic depletion of SHP2 in cancer cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SHP099 efficacy in KRAS-mutant models can be recapitulated with RTK inhibitors, suggesting RTK activity is responsible for the SHP2 activation. Taken together, these data reveal that many KRAS-mutant cancers depend on upstream signaling from RTK and SHP2, and provide a new therapeutic framework for treating KRAS-mutant cancers with SHP2 inhibitors.

FGFR1 was recently shown to be activated as part of a compensatory response to prolonged treatment with the MEK inhibitor trametinib in several KRAS-mutant lung and pancreatic cancer cell lines. We hypothesize that other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) are also feedback-activated in this context. Herein, we profile a large panel of KRAS-mutant cancer cell lines for the contribution of RTKs to the feedback activation of phospho-MEK following MEK inhibition, using an SHP2 inhibitor (SHP099) that blocks RAS activation mediated by multiple RTKs. We find that RTK-driven feedback activation widely exists in KRAS-mutant cancer cells, to a less extent in those harboring the G13D variant, and involves several RTKs, including EGFR, FGFR, and MET. We further demonstrate that this pathway feedback activation is mediated through mutant KRAS, at least for the G12C, G12D, and G12V variants, and wild-type KRAS can also contribute significantly to the feedback activation. Finally, SHP099 and MEK inhibitors exhibit combination benefits inhibiting KRAS-mutant cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. These findings provide a rationale for exploration of combining SHP2 and MAPK pathway inhibitors for treating KRAS-mutant cancers in the clinic.

Summary Background Resistance to first-generation and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is mediated by the emergence of the Thr790Met mutation in 50–60% of treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the safety and activity of nazartinib (EGF816), a third-generation EGFR TKI that selectively inhibits EGFR with Thr790Met or activating mutations (or both), while sparing wild-type EGFR, in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Methods This phase 1 dose-escalation part of an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 study was conducted at nine academic medical centres located in Europe, Asia, and North America. Patients were included if they were aged 18 years or older and had stage IIIB–IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC (with varying statuses of EGFR mutation and previous therapy allowed), at least one measurable lesion, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less. Nazartinib (at seven dose levels between 75 mg and 350 mg, in capsule or tablet form) was administered orally, once daily, on a continuous 28-day dosing schedule. A two-parameter Bayesian logistic regression model, guided by the escalation with overdose control principle, was implemented to make dose recommendations and estimate the maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase 2 dose of nazartinib (the primary outcome). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02108964 ); enrolment to phase 1 is complete and the study is ongoing. Findings By Aug 31, 2017, 180 patients (116 [64%] women; median age 60 years (52–69); 116 [64%] with ECOG performance status 1) received nazartinib across seven dose levels: 75 mg (n=17), 100 mg (n=38), 150 mg (n=73), 200 mg (n=8), 225 mg (n=28), 300 mg (n=5), and 350 mg (n=11). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were observed in six (3%) patients who received 150 mg, 225 mg, or 350 mg nazartinib once daily. Although the maximum tolerated dose was not met, the recommended phase 2 dose was declared as 150 mg once daily (tablet). The most common adverse events, regardless of cause, were rash (all subcategories 111 [62%] patients, maculopapular rash 72 [40%], dermatitis acneiform 22 [12%]), diarrhoea (81 [45%]), pruritus (70 [39%]), fatigue (54 [30%]), and stomatitis (54 [30%]), and were mostly grades 1–2. Any-cause grade 3–4 adverse events were reported in 99 (55%) patients across all doses, the most common being rash (all subcategories grouped 27 [15%]), pneumonia (12 [7%]), anaemia (ten [6%]), and dyspnoea (nine [5%]). Serious adverse events suspected to be drug-related occurred in 16 (9%) patients. Interpretation Nazartinib has a favourable safety profile, with low-grade skin toxicity characterised by a predominantly maculopapular rash that required minimal dose reductions. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

3005 Background: SHP2 transduces signals from activated receptor tyrosine kinases to downstream pathways including MAPK. TNO155 is a selective, allosteric, oral inhibitor of SHP2. Methods: CTNO155X2101 (NCT03114319) is an ongoing first-in-human, open-label dose escalation/expansion trial of TNO155 in adults with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective is to characterize the safety and tolerability of TNO155 and identify regimen(s) for future study. Secondary assessments included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical efficacy. Here we present data from TNO155 single agent escalation. Results: As of 10/26/2020, 118 patients received TNO155 in variable schedules: once (QD; 1.5–70 mg; n = 55) or twice daily (BID; 30–50 mg; n = 25) in a 2 weeks on/1 week off (2w/1w) cycle; or QD in a 3w/1w cycle (30–60 mg; n = 32), or continuously (40 or 50 mg QD; n = 6). The most common cancer diagnoses treated were colorectal (54%), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (16%), non-small cell lung (12%), and head & neck (8%). The median number of prior antineoplastic therapies was 4 (range 1–10). Overall 109 patients (92%) have discontinued study treatment, 94 (80%) for progressive disease and 6 (5%) for adverse events (AEs). TNO155 showed rapid absorption (median day 1 Tmax ̃1.1 hours), an effective median T½ of ̃34 hours, and near dose-proportional exposure at day 14 (power model: AUCτ beta = 1.09 [90% CI 1.02–1.16]). AEs were mostly Grade 1/2 and generally consistent with on-target effects of SHP2 inhibition. The most common treatment-related AEs (all grades) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (n = 33, 28%), peripheral edema (n = 31, 26%), diarrhea (n = 31, 26%), and acneiform dermatitis (n = 27, 23%). The most common treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs were decreased platelets (n = 5, 4%), increased aspartate aminotransferase, diarrhea, and decreased neutrophils (each n = 4, 3%). The best observed response was stable disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1, reported in 24 (20%) patients, with a median duration of SD of 4.9 months (range 1.7–29.3). Evidence of SHP2 inhibition, as measured by change in DUSP6 expression by qPCR in paired pre- vs. on-treatment tumor samples, was seen in the majority of patients treated with TNO155 doses ≥20 mg/day (≥25% reduction, 38/42 [90%]; ≥50% reduction, 25/42 [60%]). Analysis of tumor whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing data is ongoing. Conclusions: TNO155 shows favorable pharmacokinetic properties and promising early safety and tolerability data at doses with evidence of target inhibition. The optimal dose using several schedules is still under evaluation. Studies of TNO155 in combination with other agents, including nazartinib (mutant-selective EGFR inhibitor[i]), adagrasib (KRAS G12Ci), spartalizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody), ribociclib (CDK4/6i), and dabrafenib (BRAFi) with LTT462 (ERKi), are ongoing (NCT03114319, NCT04330664, NCT04000529, NCT04294160). Clinical trial information: NCT03114319.

TPS146 Background: KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer and a key mediator of the RAS/MAPK signaling cascade that promotes cellular growth and proliferation. KRAS G12C tumor mutations occur in approximately 14% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma and 3-4% of colorectal adenocarinoma. SHP2 is a phosphatase that acts as a key mediator of signaling from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) to downstream RAS/MAPK pathways. Adagrasib (MRTX849) is a specific small-molecule investigational inhibitor of KRAS G12C that covalently binds to and locks mutant KRAS in its GDP-bound inactive form. Adagrasib has been optimized for a long half-life and extensive tissue distribution to enable inhibition throughout the entire dosing interval. Preliminary results from a Phase 1/2 study of adagrasib demonstrated promising antitumor activity and tolerability across multiple KRAS G12C tumor types. TNO155 is a selective inhibitor of SHP2 with demonstrated inhibition of RTK signaling and significant antitumor activity in preclinical models. Preclinical studies have shown that resistance to KRAS G12C inhibition may be mediated by SHP2-dependent feedback loops. Because KRAS G12C retains some level of cycling between GTP- and GDP-bound states, KRAS G12C that is not bound by inhibitor can activate downstream signaling. Active SHP2 functions to increase the active state of RAS proteins (including mutant KRAS) and also increases ERK pathway activation. Therefore, the addition of TNO155 to adagrasib may augment antitumor activity and overcome resistance by inhibiting cycling to GTP-bound KRAS and/or through inhibition of feedback activation and more comprehensively inhibiting downstream ERK signaling. In KRAS G12C human tumor models, adagrasib combined with a SHP2 inhibitor demonstrated greater activity compared to each agent alone. These data provide support for clinical evaluation of this combination in KRAS G12C tumors. Methods: KRYSTAL-2 is a multicenter Phase 1/2 study evaluating adagrasib and TNO155 in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a KRAS G12C mutation. Overall objectives of the trial include evaluating safety, tolerability, and PK. The Phase 1 portion will evaluate adagrasib and TNO155 utilizing a modified Toxicity Probability Interval dose escalation design to identify maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose. The Phase 2 portion utilizes a Simon's optimal two-stage design to evaluate the clinical activity of adagrasib with TNO155 in 2 cohorts of up to 108 patients—CRC (54 patients) and NSCLC (54 patients). Efficacy endpoints include Objective Response Rate (RECIST 1.1), Duration of Response (DOR), Progression-free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS). The study is currently enrolling and patients will receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, patient withdrawal, or death. Clinical trial information: NCT04330664.

Background: WNT974, a Porcupine inhibitor, has shown evidence of Wnt pathway inhibition in clinical trials. Dysregulated Wnt signaling has been linked to immunotherapy resistance, suggesting WNT974 may act synergistically with checkpoint inhibitors. Spartalizumab is an αPD-1 mAb with demonstrated clinical activity in solid tumors. Methods: In this Phase I, open-label trial (NCT01351103) adult pts received WNT974 ± spartalizumab; here we report on the dose escalation of the combination. Eligible pts had melanoma (including uveal), lung SCC, HNSCC, esophageal SCC, cervical SCC, or TNBC. Pts with melanoma, lung SCC, or HNSCC must have had a best response of progressive disease (primary refractory) to prior αPD-1 therapy; other pts were naïve or primary refractory to prior αPD-1. WNT974 was dosed orally QD in 28-day cycles (2.5-10 mg, Days 1-8 or 1-15 of Cycles 1 or 1-4); spartalizumab was dosed IV at 400 mg Q4W. Objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended dose for expansion (RDE), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and activity of WNT974 + spartalizumab. Pre- and on-treatment pt samples were collected: skin samples for RT-PCR analysis of AXIN2, a marker of Wnt pathway activity; tumor samples for RNAseq of AXIN2 and immune cell markers. Results: As of Sept 2, 2019, 27 pts were enrolled: 24 discontinued (18 due to disease progression; 67%), 3 were ongoing. Most common tumor types were non-uveal melanoma (n=8), TNBC (n=7), and uveal melanoma (n=5); 63% had received prior αPD-1. PK parameters for WNT974 + spartalizumab were consistent with prior single agent data. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 2 pts: Grade (G) 2 spinal compression fracture that occurred in the setting of trauma and G3 arthralgia. 78% of pts experienced a treatment-related AE, the most common being hypothyroidism (19%); 4 pts (15%) had 7 suspected-related G3/4 AEs (arthralgia, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemia, hyponatremia, and maculopapular rash). One pt (4%) with TNBC had a partial response, 11 pts (41%) had stable disease (SD), 13 pts (48%) had progressive disease; response was unknown in 2 pts. SD was reported in 9/17 pts (53%) who were primary refractory to prior αPD-1; 4 remained on study >24 wks. All pts with uveal melanoma (n=5) had SD. Evidence of Porcupine inhibition, assessed by skin AXIN2 suppression, was detected at all dose levels studied. Pts with the largest reductions in tumor size had on-treatment increases in immune marker mRNA in tumor samples, including a pt with αPD-1 primary refractory melanoma with high baseline AXIN2 expression and 42% reduction in the sum of target lesion diameters; this pt remained on study at 48 wks at the cutoff date. Conclusions: WNT974 + spartalizumab was well tolerated; MTD/RDE have not been determined. Preliminary data suggest blocking Wnt signaling may enable response to checkpoint inhibition in some pts. Citation Format: Filip Janku, Filip de Vos, Maria de Miguel, Patrick Forde, Antoni Ribas, Misako Nagasaka, Guillem Argiles, Ana Maria Arance, Aitano Calvo, Marios Giannakis, Maritza Melendez, Jiachang Gong, Sebastian Szpakowski, Rebecca Kan, Susan E. Moody, Maja De Jonge. Phase I study of WNT974 + spartalizumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT034.

Introduction: The RTK-RAS-MAPK pathway is frequently activated in cancers due to a variety of mechanisms including mutations or amplifications in RTK, KRAS or BRAF. The effectiveness of inhibitors targeting those oncogenic drivers is often limited by the pathway feedback activation originated at the RTK level in response to ERK inhibition. The non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 mediates RAS activation downstream of various receptor tyrosine kinases. Potent and selective allosteric SHP2 inhibitors such as TNO155 are in clinical development and offer an appealing one-size-fits-all approach to overcome RTK-mediated feedback activation of RAS and enhance the efficacy of inhibitors targeting RTK, BRAF or KRASG12C. We sought to study the combination efficacy and mechanism in pre-clinical models for prioritization in clinical trials. Experimental procedures: The combination efficacy and synergy of TNO155 with EGF816 (a 3rd generation EGFR inhibitor), dabrafenib+trametinib or a tool KRAS G12C inhibitor (G12Ci) were respectively assessed in a number of EGFR mutant lung cancer models, BRAFV600E colorectal cancer models and KRASG12C lung and colorectal cancer models. The effect of the combinations on ERK inhibition was also studied. Results: TNO155 has varying single agent activity in vitro in EGFR mutant lung cancer cell lines and is not affected by clinically relevant resistance mechanisms to EGFR inhibitors such as secondary mutations in EGFR (T790M and C797S) or MET amplification. In addition, the combination of TNO155 and EGF816 is synergistic across cell lines, coincident with sustained ERK inhibition. In BRAFV600E colorectal cancer cell lines with feedback activation of EGFR, MET or FGFR respectively in response to treatment with dabrafenib+trametinib, TNO155 synergistically enhanced the efficacy of dabrafenib+trametinib in all three cell lines, phenocopying respective RTK inhibitors. In KRASG12C lung cancer cell lines, quick rebound of p-ERK was observed as early as 24 hour post treatment with G12Ci and cannot be blocked by increasing concentrations of G12Ci, suggesting feedback activation of wild-type KRAS or other RAS isoforms. In contrast, TNO155 effectively blocked the p-ERK rebound and enhanced the efficacy of G12Ci. Similar observations were made in KRASG12C colorectal cancer cell lines. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that SHP2 inhibition is an effective strategy to block the feedback activation of wild type and G12C KRAS, as well as NRAS and HRAS, by a variety of RTKs, in response to ERK inhibition. Given the mutant selective properties of those inhibitors we studied, the tolerability of their combinations with TNO155 is highly expected. Our data provide pre-clinical rationale to explore those TNO155 combinations in the corresponding cancer indications in clinic. Citation Format: Huaixiang Hao, Chen Liu, Hongyun Wang, Hengyu Lu, Scott Delach, Matthew LaMarche, Jeffrey Engelman, Peter Hammerman, Giordano Caponigro, Susan Moody, Morvarid Mohseni. Combinations of SHP2 inhibitor to overcome RAS activation by receptor tyrosine kinases in response to ERK inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-122.

FGFR1 was recently shown to be activated as part of a compensatory response to prolonged treatment with MEK inhibitor trametinib in several KRAS-mutant lung and pancreatic cancer cell lines. We hypothesize that other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are also feedback activated in this context. Herein, we profile a large panel of KRAS-mutant cancer cell lines for the contribution of RTKs to the feedback activation of phospho-MEK following MEK inhibition, using a SHP2 inhibitor (SHP099) that blocks RAS activation mediated by multiple RTKs. We find that RTK-driven feedback activation widely exists in KRAS mutant cancer cells and involves several RTKs including EGFR, FGFR, and MET. We further demonstrate this pathway feedback activation is mediated through mutant KRAS. Finally, SHP099 and MEK inhibitors exhibit combination benefits inhibiting KRAS mutant cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. These findings provide a rationale for exploration of combining SHP2 and MAPK pathway inhibitors for treating KRAS-mutant cancers in the clinic. Citation Format: Hengyu Lu, Chen Liu, Roberto Velazquez, Hongyun Wang, Lukas M. Dunkl, Malika Kazic-Legueux, Anne Haberkorn, Eric Billy, Eusebio Manchado, Saskia M. Brachmann, Susan Moody, Jeffrey A. Engelman, Peter S. Hammerman, Giordano Caponigro, Morvarid Mohseni, Huai-Xiang Hao. SHP2 inhibition overcomes RTK-mediated pathway reactivation in KRAS-mutant tumors treated with MEK inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Targeting RAS-Driven Cancers; 2018 Dec 9-12; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2020;18(5_Suppl):Abstract nr A44.

Purpose Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors like nazartinib are active against EGFR mutation–positive lung cancers with T790M-mediated acquired resistance to initial anti-EGFR treatment, but some patients have mixed responses. Methods Multiple serial tumor and liquid biopsies were obtained from two patients before, during, and after treatment with nazartinib. Next-generation sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction were performed to assess heterogeneity and clonal dynamics. Results We observed the simultaneous emergence of T790M-dependent and -independent clones in both patients. Serial plasma droplet digital polymerase chain reaction illustrated shifts in relative clonal abundance in response to various systemic therapies, confirming a molecular basis for the clinical mixed radiographic responses observed. Conclusion Heterogeneous responses to treatment targeting a solitary resistance mechanism can be explained by coexistent tumor subclones harboring distinct genetic signatures. Serial liquid biopsies offer an opportunity to monitor clonal dynamics and the emergence of resistance and may represent a useful tool to guide therapeutic strategies.

Most anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung tumors initially respond to small-molecule ALK inhibitors, but drug resistance often develops. Of tumors that develop resistance to highly potent second-generation ALK inhibitors, approximately half harbor resistance mutations in ALK, while the other half have other mechanisms underlying resistance. Members of the latter group often have activation of at least one of several different tyrosine kinases driving resistance. Such tumors are not expected to respond to lorlatinib-a third-generation inhibitor targeting ALK that is able to overcome all clinically identified resistant mutations in ALK-and further therapeutic options are limited. Herein, we deployed a shRNA screen of 1,000 genes in multiple ALK-inhibitor-resistant patient-derived cells (PDCs) to discover those that confer sensitivity to ALK inhibition. This approach identified SHP2, a nonreceptor protein tyrosine phosphatase, as a common targetable resistance node in multiple PDCs. SHP2 provides a parallel survival input downstream of multiple tyrosine kinases that promote resistance to ALK inhibitors. Treatment with SHP099, the recently discovered small-molecule inhibitor of SHP2, in combination with the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) ceritinib halted the growth of resistant PDCs through preventing compensatory RAS and ERK1 and ERK2 (ERK1/2) reactivation. These findings suggest that combined ALK and SHP2 inhibition may be a promising therapeutic strategy for resistant cancers driven by several different ALK-independent mechanisms underlying resistance.

Oncogenic PIK3CA mutations are found in a significant fraction of human cancers, but therapeutic inhibition of PI3K has only shown limited success in clinical trials. To understand how mutant PIK3CA contributes to cancer cell proliferation, we used genome scale loss-of-function screening in a large number of genomically annotated cancer cell lines. As expected, we found that PIK3CA mutant cancer cells require PIK3CA but also require the expression of the TCA cycle enzyme 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (OGDH). To understand the relationship between oncogenic PIK3CA and OGDH function, we interrogated metabolic requirements and found an increased reliance on glucose metabolism to sustain PIK3CA mutant cell proliferation. Functional metabolic studies revealed that OGDH suppression increased levels of the metabolite 2-oxoglutarate (2OG). We found that this increase in 2OG levels, either by OGDH suppression or exogenous 2OG treatment, resulted in aspartate depletion that was specifically manifested as auxotrophy within PIK3CA mutant cells. Reduced levels of aspartate deregulated the malate–aspartate shuttle, which is important for cytoplasmic NAD+ regeneration that sustains rapid glucose breakdown through glycolysis. Consequently, because PIK3CA mutant cells exhibit a profound reliance on glucose metabolism, malate–aspartate shuttle deregulation leads to a specific proliferative block due to the inability to maintain NAD+/NADH homeostasis. Together these observations define a precise metabolic vulnerability imposed by a recurrently mutated oncogene.

Targeting HER2 with antibodies or small molecule inhibitors in HER2-positive breast cancer leads to improved survival, but resistance is a common clinical problem. To uncover novel mechanisms of resistance to anti-HER2 therapy in breast cancer, we performed a kinase open reading frame screen to identify genes that rescue HER2-amplified breast cancer cells from HER2 inhibition or suppression. In addition to multiple members of the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase) signaling pathways, we discovered that expression of the survival kinases PRKACA and PIM1 rescued cells from anti-HER2 therapy. Furthermore, we observed elevated PRKACA expression in trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer samples, indicating that this pathway is activated in breast cancers that are clinically resistant to trastuzumab-containing therapy. We found that neither PRKACA nor PIM1 restored MAPK or PI3K activation after lapatinib or trastuzumab treatment, but rather inactivated the pro-apoptotic protein BAD, the BCl-2-associated death promoter, thereby permitting survival signaling through BCL-XL. Pharmacological blockade of BCL-XL/BCL-2 partially abrogated the rescue effects conferred by PRKACA and PIM1, and sensitized cells to lapatinib treatment. These observations suggest that combined targeting of HER2 and the BCL-XL/BCL-2 anti-apoptotic pathway may increase responses to anti-HER2 therapy in breast cancer and decrease the emergence of resistant disease.

Introduction: FGFR1 was recently shown to be activated as part of a compensatory response to prolonged treatment with MEK inhibitor (MEKi) such as trametinib in several KRAS mutant lung and pancreatic cancer cell lines. We hypothesize that other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are also feedback activated in KRAS mutant cell lines after MEKi treatment. Experimental procedures: We profiled a large panel (n>32) of KRAS mutant cancer cell lines for the contribution of RTKs to the feedback activation of phospho-MEK following MEK inhibition, using a SHP2 inhibitor (SHP099) that blocks RAS activation mediated by multiple RTKs. We then performed in vitro and in vivo combination efficacy studies and pathway analysis in various KRAS mutant cancer models. Results: We find that RTK-driven feedback activation widely exists in KRAS mutant cancer cells and involves several RTKs including EGFR, FGFR, and MET. We further demonstrate that this pathway feedback activation is mediated through mutant KRAS in KRAS G12C or G12D models. Finally, SHP099 and MEK inhibitors exhibit combination benefits inhibiting MAPK pathway and KRAS mutant cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that MAPK inhibition in KRAS mutant cancer provokes feedback re-activation of the pathway that often involves RTK activity and SHP2 inhibition may enhance the efficacy of MEKi in KRAS mutant tumors. These findings provide a rationale for exploration of combining SHP2 and MAPK pathway inhibitors for treating KRAS mutant cancers in the clinic. Citation Format: Hengyu Lu, Chen Liu, Roberto Velazquez, Hongyun Wang, Lukas M. Dunkl, Malika Kazic-Legueux, Anne Haberkorn, Eric Billy, Eusebio Manchado, Saskia M. Brachmann, Susan Moody, Jeffrey A. Engelman, Peter S. Hammerman, Giordano Caponigro, Morvarid Mohseni, Huaixiang Hao. SHP2 inhibition overcomes RTK-mediated pathway reactivation in KRAS mutant tumors treated with MEK inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 954.

Amplification and/or overexpression of the receptor tyrosine kinase HER2 occurs in 20-25% of breast cancers, and is associated with poor prognosis. Targeting of HER2 with drugs such as trastuzumab, lapatinib, or pertuzumab has led to clinical benefit in patients with both metastatic and early-stage HER2-amplified breast cancer. However, resistance and disease progression always occurs in patients with metastatic disease, and many patients with early-stage breast cancer experience recurrences despite adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. As such, understanding the mechanisms of resistance to anti-HER2 therapy has important clinical implications. Recent studies have identified mutations in PIK3CA, the gene encoding the catalytic subunit of Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K), as one mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab. However, such mutations are present in only a fraction of trastuzumab-resistant breast cancers. We therefore sought to uncover novel mechanisms of resistance to anti-HER2 therapy through an unbiased screen for kinases and kinase-related molecules that are able to rescue HER2-amplified breast cancer cells from HER2 inhibition. We utilized a library of nearly 600 lentivirally-delivered open reading frames (ORFs) to constitutively express the coding sequence of each molecule individually in HER2-amplified BT474 breast cancer cells in arrayed high-throughput format. We conducted two parallel screens for the ability of each of these molecules to rescue cells from anti-HER2 therapy: one in which we treated the cells with a lapatinib-like drug that inhibits the kinase activity of HER2 and EGFR, and one in which we lentivirally delivered a short hairpin RNA that suppresses expression of HER2. We identified those ORFs that restored viability of BT474 cells to greater than two standard deviations above the median of all ORFs in each screen. Multiple members of the MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways scored in both screens, serving to validate the approach. In addition, the survival kinases PIM1 and PRKACA scored robustly. Mechanistic studies suggest that these kinases may confer resistance by restoring the phosphorylation of, and thereby inactivating, the pro-apoptotic protein BAD. Consistent with this finding, overexpression of Bcl-xl, which is inhibited by BAD, also conferred resistance to lapatinib in HER2-amplified breast cancer cells. Furthermore, pharmacological blockade of Bcl-xl and Bcl-2 with ABT-263 enhanced lapatinib-induced killing of HER2-amplified breast cancer cells in vitro, and partially abrogated the rescue conferred by both PRKACA and PIM1. These findings suggest that combined inhibition of HER2 and the anti-apoptotic molecules Bcl-xl and Bcl-2 could enhance tumor cell eradication and prevent or delay the emergence of resistant disease. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-08-01.

Background: Dysregulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been linked to several cancers, including pancreatic cancer (PC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). WNT974 (formerly LGK974) - a first-in-class, selective, oral inhibitor of Porcupine (an O-acyltransferase required for Wnt activation and secretion) - has shown preclinical activity in tumor models with mutations upstream in the Wnt pathway. Furthermore, dysregulated Wnt signaling has been linked to T-cell exclusion in tumor tissue and resistance to immunotherapy, suggesting WNT974 may act synergistically with checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: This ongoing Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion study (NCT01351103) is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended dose for expansion, characterize the safety and tolerability, and assess preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic properties of WNT974, alone or combined with PDR001 (spartalizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody) in advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Here, we focus on preliminary biomarker analyses from the single-agent part of the study. The study initially enrolled pts with lobular breast cancer and melanoma and was later amended to enroll pts with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), PC, and CRC, and those with tumors with genetic alterations upstream in the Wnt pathway. Pre and on-treatment skin and tumor tissue specimens were collected for RT-PCR analysis of AXIN2, a marker of Wnt pathway activity. NanoString gene expression was measured in a subset of pts using remnant RNA from the tumor samples, and chemokine and dendritic cell signatures were analyzed pre and on-treatment. Results: At the data cut-off date, March 2, 2017, 94 pts were enrolled. Median age was 58.5 years (range, 28-77), 43% were male, and the most common cancer types were PC (30%), melanoma (26%), and breast cancer (21%). Patients received single-agent WNT974 orally at doses of 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 22.5, or 30 mg daily, 30 or 45 mg intermittently (4 days on, 3 days off), or 5 mg twice daily. Median duration of exposure was 4.9 weeks (range, 0.1-27.7). Safety, tolerability, and PK have previously been reported. AXIN2 expression in paired samples from skin and tumor showed evidence of Wnt pathway inhibition in all indications; this was not dose-dependent in the dose range studied. Immune signature analyses of a paired tumor sample subset (n=8) revealed an inverse association between change in AXIN2 expression and change in chemokine and activated dendritic cell signatures. Conclusions: Biomarker analyses show that WNT974 can potently inhibit Wnt pathway activity in skin and tumors. Immune signature data suggest that WNT974 treatment may promote T-cell recruitment into tumors, and support investigation of the combination of WNT974 with immunotherapy. The combination part of this study evaluating WNT974 combined with PDR001 (spartalizumab) is ongoing. Citation Format: Jordi Rodon, Guillem Argilés, Roisin M. Connolly, Ulka Vaishampayan, Maja de Jonge, Elena Garralda, Marios Giannakis, David C. Smith, Jason R. Dobson, Margaret McLaughlin, Abdelkader Seroutou, Yan Ji, Sinead Dolan, Jennifer Morawiak, Susan Moody, Filip Janku. Biomarker analyses from a phase I study of WNT974, a first-in-class Porcupine inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT175.

Most anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung tumors initially respond to small-molecule ALK inhibitors, but drug resistance often develops. After tumors develop resistance to highly potent 2nd-generation ALK inhibitors, approximately half harbor ALK resistance mutations, while the other half have other mechanisms of resistance. The latter often have activation of at least one of several different tyrosine kinases driving resistance. Such tumors are not expected to respond to the 3rd-generation ALK inhibitor, lorlatinib, which is able to overcome all clinically identified ALK resistance mutations, and further therapeutic options are limited. Herein, we deployed an shRNA screen of 1000 genes in multiple ALK inhibitor-resistant patient-derived cells (PDC) to discover sensitizers to ALK inhibition. This approach identified SHP2, a non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase, as a common targetable resistance node in multiple PDCs. SHP2 provides a parallel survival input downstream of multiple tyrosine kinases that promote resistance to ALK inhibitors. The recently discovered small-molecule SHP2 inhibitor, SHP099, in combination with the ALK TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor), ceritinib, halted the growth of resistant PDCs by preventing compensatory RAS and ERK1/2 reactivation. These findings suggest that combined ALK and SHP2 inhibition may be a promising therapeutic strategy for resistant cancers driven by several different ALK-independent resistance mechanisms. Citation Format: Leila Dardaei, Hui Qin Wang, Manrose Singh, Paul Fordjour, Satoshi Yoda, Grainne Kerr, Jinsheng Liang, Yichen Cao, Yan Chen, Justin Gainor, Luc Friboulet, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, David Myers, Emma Labrot, David Ruddy, Melissa Parks, Dana Lee, Richard DiCecca, Susan Moody, Huaixiang Hao, Morvarid Mohseni, Matthew LaMarche, Juliet Williams, Keith Hoffmaster, Giordano Caponigro, Alice Shaw, Aaron Hata, Cyril Benes, Fang Li, Jeffrey Engelman. SHP2 inhibition restores sensitivity to ALK inhibitors in resistant ALK-rearranged NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A145.

Despite development of highly potent and selective inhibitors (e.g., ceritinib, alectinib, lorlatinib) targeting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), resistance invariably develops and limits the efficacy of these inhibitors in the clinic. The major classes of resistance are on-target genetic alterations (e.g., secondary ALK kinase domain mutations) and activation of alternative or bypass signaling pathways. While most patients are responsive to sequential treatment with two or more ALK inhibitors, ALK-independent resistance eventually emerges and leads to failure of further ALK-directed monotherapy. We used a synthetic lethal pooled shRNA screen to discover loss-of-function events that could sensitize resistant patient-derived cell lines to ALK inhibition. In addition to identifying known bypass targets such as FGFR, EGFR and SRC, we also identified PTPN11 (which encodes SHP2, a non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase that modulates signaling downstream of growth factor receptors) as a common hit shared by cell lines exhibiting different mechanisms of bypass activation. In parallel with the shRNA screen, we also performed a high throughput combination compound screen in the same patient-derived models, and identified activation of the same bypass signaling pathways. We showed that the highly potent and selective small-molecule SHP2 inhibitor SHP099 could sensitize resistant cell lines to ALK inhibition. In biochemical studies, co-targeting of ALK and SHP2 overcame resistance mediated by ALK-independent bypass mechanisms by decreasing RAS-GTP loading potential of cells and inhibiting phospho-ERK rebound. These results suggest that dual ALK and SHP2 inhibition may represent a new therapeutic strategy for ALK-positive patients, whose lung cancers have evolved ALK-independent mechanisms of resistance, including activation of bypass signaling pathways. Citation Format: Leila Dardaei, Hui Qin Wang, Paul Fordjour, Manrose Singh, Grainne Kerr, Satoshi Yoda, Jinsheng Liang, Yichen Cao, Yan Chen, Justin F. Gainor, Luc Friboulet, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack, David T. Myers, Emma Labrot, David Ruddy, Melissa Parks, Dana Lee, Richard H. DiCecca, Susan Moody, Huaixiang Hao, Morvarid Mohseni, Matthew LaMarche, Juliet Williams, Keith Hoffmaster, Giordano Caponigro, Cyril H. Benes, Alice T. Shaw, Aaron N. Hata, Fang Li, Jeffrey A. Engelman. SHP2 inhibition restores sensitivity to ALK inhibition in resistant ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1007. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1007

11506 Background: Up to 60% of patients (pts) with NSCLC harboring an activating EGFR mutation (mut) and treated with a 1st generation EGFR TKI develop a secondary gatekeeper T790M mut. EGF816 is an irreversible EGFR TKI that is highly potent against activating mut (L858R, ex19del) and T790M mut, while sparing wild-type EGFR. As previously reported, in a Phase I dose escalation study, the overall response rate to EGF816 in pts with advanced EGFR T790M mut NSCLC was 47% and the disease control rate was 87%. However, pts ultimately develop disease progression. Tumor biopsies were obtained from pts who had progressed on EGF816 to identify mechanisms of resistance. Methods: Pts with NSCLC with locally or centrally confirmed T790M status were enrolled in this multicenter, dose escalation study to determine the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of EGF816 (NCT02108964). EGF816 was administered at 7 dose levels ranging from of 75-350 mg QD. Following disease progression, a tumor sample was obtained and was analyzed by the Foundation Medicine next-generation sequencing (NGS) T7 panel, which interrogates 395 cancer-related genes for base substitutions, insertion-deletions, and copy number changes, as well as introns of 31 genes involved in rearrangements. Results: Tumor samples taken following disease progression on EGF816 were analyzed from 9 pts. Of the 8 pts whose tumors were T790M+ at baseline, this was detected in only 3 pts’ post-EGF816 progression samples. One patient developed an EGFR C797S mut and concurrent deletion in mTOR. Other identified alterations include BRAF fusions (n = 2) and c-MET amplification (n = 1). Only one patient was found to have concurrent TP53 mutation and RB1 truncating mutation. Individual patient response data, including duration of response, will be presented along with detailed genomic parameters. Conclusions: NGS analysis of tumors that developed resistance to EGF816 revealed multiple potential mechanisms of resistance. These data are hypothesis-generating and could lead to rational combination studies with EGF816 to improve the depth and/or duration of response to EGF816. Clinical trial information: NCT02108964.

Although the roles of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling in KRAS-driven tumorigenesis are well established, KRAS activates additional pathways required for tumor maintenance, the inhibition of which are likely to be necessary for effective KRAS-directed therapy. Here, we show that the IκB kinase (IKK)–related kinases Tank-binding kinase-1 (TBK1) and IKKϵ promote KRAS-driven tumorigenesis by regulating autocrine CCL5 and interleukin (IL)-6 and identify CYT387 as a potent JAK/TBK1/IKKϵ inhibitor. CYT387 treatment ablates RAS-associated cytokine signaling and impairs Kras-driven murine lung cancer growth. Combined CYT387 treatment and MAPK pathway inhibition induces regression of aggressive murine lung adenocarcinomas driven by Kras mutation and p53 loss. These observations reveal that TBK1/IKKϵ promote tumor survival by activating CCL5 and IL-6 and identify concurrent inhibition of TBK1/IKKϵ, Janus-activated kinase (JAK), and MEK signaling as an effective approach to inhibit the actions of oncogenic KRAS. Significance: In addition to activating MAPK and PI3K, oncogenic KRAS engages cytokine signaling to promote tumorigenesis. CYT387, originally described as a selective JAK inhibitor, is also a potent TBK/IKKϵ inhibitor that uniquely disrupts a cytokine circuit involving CCL5, IL-6, and STAT3. The efficacy of CYT387-based treatment in murine Kras-driven lung cancer models uncovers a novel therapeutic approach for these refractory tumors with immediate translational implications. Cancer Discov; 4(4); 452–65. ©2014 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 377

Malaria is the major life threatening parasitic disease and the cause of a global public health problem. The failure of vector eradication programs and the appearance and spread of drug resistant parasites have posed the urgent challenge of developing effective, safe and affordable anti-malarial drugs. The design of such drugs is largely based on the targeting of agents to the parasite-based machinery for host digestion and to the products of hemoglobin catabolism. Iron chelators, by depriving intracellular parasites from essential iron, lead to selective suppression of parasite growth. However, by acting on parasite-impaired macrophages, chelators can also expedite resumption of phagocytosis and elimination of parasites. In order to be clinically effective, chelators need to be maintained in the blood for extensive time periods. Therapeutic doses can be attained with appropriate drug combinations and formulations or delivery devices and these must be presented in a form well tolerated by the host. The early documentation that chelation therapy has activity against human malaria has paved the road for the design of novel and more efficient remedies based on short-term iron deprivation.

The lipophosphoglycan-like (LPG-like) molecules of E. histolytica virulent strains are clearly distinct from those of the avirulent E. histolytica and E. dispar strains. Abundant 'LPG' levels are apparently limited to virulent strains, while lipophosphopeptidoglycans ('LPPG's) are common to both virulent and avirulent strains of E. histolytica and E. dispar. It is therefore conceivable that 'LPPG' performs a function that is essential to survival within the host, while the 'LPG' performs a more specific function related to virulence.

9044Background: Up to 60% of patients (pts) with NSCLC harboring an activating EGFR mutation (mut) and treated with a first-generation EGFR TKI develop a secondary gatekeeper T790M mut. EGF816 is an irreversible EGFR TKI that is highly potent against activating mut (L858R, ex19del) and T790M mut, while sparing wild-type EGFR. Methods: Pts with NSCLC with locally or centrally confirmed T790M status were enrolled in this multicenter, dose-escalation study to determine the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of EGF816 (NCT02108964). EGF816 was administered in capsule or tablet form on a continuous 28-day schedule. Dose escalation began at 75 mg QD and was guided by adaptive Bayesian logistic regression models to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Results: As of 30 Sept 2015, 132 pts had been treated (104 capsule; 28 tablet) across 7 dose levels (75, 150, 225, 300, and 350 mg QD for capsules; 100, 150, 200, and 225 mg QD for tablets), with median age 61.5 (range 32-82) years, 36% male, and 64% Asi...

The receptor tyrosin kinase HER2 is amplified and/or overexpressed in 25-30% of all breast cancers. Blockade of HER2 with drugs such as trastuzumab or lapatinib has led to clinical benefit in patients with both metastatic and early-stage HER2-amplified breast cancer. However, resistance and disease progression always occurs in patients with metastatic disease, and many patients with early-stage breast cancer experience recurrences despite adjuvant treatment with one of these agents. To identify novel mechanisms of resistance to anti-HER2 therapy, I conducted a screen for molecules whose forced expression in HER2-amplified breast cancer cells confers resistance to HER2 inhibition. I screened an open reading frame library of approximately 600 kinases and kinase-related molecules. I found that both activated HRAS and the catalytic subunit of Protein Kinase A (PRKACA) conferred significant resistance to both compound-mediated and genetic inhibition of HER2. Upon further mechanistic investigation, I found that activated HRAS fully restored phospo-ERK levels in the presence of either of two HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but did not restore phospho-AKT1 levels. By contrast, PRKACA expression provided resistance to anti-HER2 treatment, but did not restore phospho-ERK or phospho-AKT1 levels. The mechanisms by which resistance is conferred by PRKACA are under continued investigation.

Although this chapter is entitled ‘Alternatives to Prison’ it is imprisonment itself which should be regarded as the final alternative, since the abolition of capital punishment in 1965. This view of prison as a ‘last resort’ is not new. Penal philosophers from Beccaria to Baroness Wooton have asserted that the extreme deprivation of liberty which imprisonment represents requires equally stringent justifications for its imposition (see Honderich, 1971). Indeed, this principle is endorsed in legislation so that a court must not pass sentence of imprisonment on a person of or over 21 years of age who has not previously been sentenced to imprisonment or detention by a court in any part of the United Kingdom, unless the court considers that no other method of dealing with him is appropriate. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1980

The proto-oncogene KRAS is mutated in a wide array of human cancers, most of which are aggressive and respond poorly to standard therapies. Although the identification of specific oncogenes has led to the development of clinically effective, molecularly targeted therapies in some cases, KRAS has remained refractory to this approach. A complementary strategy for targeting KRAS is to identify gene products that, when inhibited, result in cell death only in the presence of an oncogenic allele. Here we have used systematic RNA interference to detect synthetic lethal partners of oncogenic KRAS and found that the non-canonical IkappaB kinase TBK1 was selectively essential in cells that contain mutant KRAS. Suppression of TBK1 induced apoptosis specifically in human cancer cell lines that depend on oncogenic KRAS expression. In these cells, TBK1 activated NF-kappaB anti-apoptotic signals involving c-Rel and BCL-XL (also known as BCL2L1) that were essential for survival, providing mechanistic insights into this synthetic lethal interaction. These observations indicate that TBK1 and NF-kappaB signalling are essential in KRAS mutant tumours, and establish a general approach for the rational identification of co-dependent pathways in cancer.