Search

Background Radiotherapy is an effective evidence-based treatment modality for the definitive management of both early and locally advanced lung cancer. Whilst the literature reports a wide range of quality indicators (QIs) to assess the surgical management of lung cancer there is a deficit of robust QIs available to measure the quality of radiotherapy received by patients[1]. We propose a literature review and modified Delphi technique to develop a set of radiotherapy specific quality indicators and benchmarks aimed at evaluating the processes involved in the planning and delivery of radiotherapy for lung cancer. Methods A modified Delphi technique will be used and will include an international expert panel in two formal rounds with a target of 40 participants and intervening steering committee review with a minimum of 9 stakeholders. Candidate radiotherapy QIs will be selected from literature review and assessed by a steering committee to be included in the Delphi process. Both QIs and proposed benchmarks will be ranked by the expert panel in 2 rounds and included in the final set of QIs if a pre-defined consensus definition for importance is met by at least 70% of responses with a score of 7 or more on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria for feasibility and proposed benchmarks will be achieved if at least 70% of responses are reported as 3 or more on a 3-point Likert scale. Discussion We aim to address the current lack of quality indicators for assessing radiotherapy in lung cancer by using a robust modified Delphi method to attain international expert consensus for a set of QIs specific to the process involved in planning and delivering radiotherapy for definitive management of lung cancer. These have the potential to provide a foundation for QI measurement and benchmarking to guide quality improvement in radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Purpose: Not all patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are suitable for concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Local failure rate is high for sequential concurrent CRT. As such, there is a rationale for treatment intensification. Methods and Materials: Isotoxic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a multicenter feasibility study that combines different intensification strategies including hyperfractionation, acceleration, and dose escalation facilitated by IMRT. Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, and unsuitable for concurrent CRT were recruited. A minimum of 2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy was compulsory before starting radiation therapy (RT). Radiation dose was increased until a maximum dose of 79.2 Gy was reached or 1 or more of the organs at risk met predefined constraints. RT was delivered in 1.8-Gy fractions twice daily, and an RT quality assurance program was implemented. The primary objective was the delivery of isotoxic IMRT to a dose >60 Gy equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2 assuming an α/β ratio of 10 Gy for acute reacting tissues). Results: Thirty-seven patients were recruited from 7 UK centers. Median age was 69.9 years (range, 46-86 years). The male-to-female ratio was 17:18. ECOG PS was 0 to 5 in 14.2% of patients; PS was 1 to 27 in 77.1% of patients; PS was 2 to 3 in 8.6% of patients. Stage IIIA:IIIB ratio was 22:13 (62.9%:37.1%). Of 37 patients, 2 (5.4%) failed to achieve EQD2 > 60 Gy. Median prescribed tumor dose was 77.4 Gy (range, 61.2-79.2 Gy). A maximum dose of 79.2Gy was achieved in 14 patients (37.8%). Grade 3 esophagitis was reported in 2 patients, and no patients developed grade 3 to 4 pneumonitis. There were 3 grade 5 events: acute radiation pneumonitis, bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, and acute lung infection. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 25.4 months (range, 8.0-44.2) months for 11 of 35 survivors. The median survival was 18.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9-30.6), 2-year overall survival was 33.6% (95% CI, 17.9-50.1), and progression-free survival was 23.9% (95% CI, 11.3-39.1). Conclusions: Isotoxic IMRT is a well-tolerated and feasible approach to treatment intensification.

Background UK Bladder cancer survival remains low. Nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is potentially curable. It is unclear how many patients receive nonradical treatment owing to advanced age, comorbidities, or alternative factors. Objective To describe treatments and assess survival by disease stage and sex for all newly diagnosed nonmetastatic MIBC in England in 2016, and to observe associations between comorbidities and treatments. Design, setting, and participants All new nonmetastatic MIBC diagnoses in England in 2016 were identified retrospectively using National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Radiotherapy Datasets, Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy, and Hospital Episode Statistics databases. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and treatments were ascertained, and 1-yr survival was estimated using Pohar-Perme and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results and limitations Nonmetastatic MIBC diagnoses were registered for 2519 patients (median age 76 yr). Radical cystectomy was performed in 24%, 37% of whom received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Radical radiotherapy was performed in 29%, 48% of whom received NAC. NAC alongside radical treatment was associated with higher 1-yr overall survival (OS)—91% (88–93%) with NAC and 83% (80–85%) without (p = 0.05). Nonradical treatments occurred for 47%, with corresponding lower OS. Females with stage II and III disease had significantly lower net survival (NS). Radically treated patients had lower CCIs. Conclusions This analysis provides an overview of all nonmetastatic MIBC diagnosed in England in 2016. Just over half of the patients received curative-intent treatment. Of them, only 43% received NAC. One-year OS was disparate, correlating with treatment intensity. Those receiving NAC and radical therapy demonstrated highest OS. Female patients had significantly inferior NS. The data highlight a prescient unmet research need to understand the patient demographic and reasons behind treatment allocation, to address the poor survival observed in those treated nonradically, and the low NAC utilisation. The significantly aged population requires specific future focus. Patient summary We looked at all patients in England in 2016 who were diagnosed with bladder cancer invading the bladder muscle. Many patients were elderly, and the most intensive treatments aiming for cure were frequently not used. Survival in women was found to be considerably worse, as was survival for less intensively treated patients.

Organ motion as a result of respiratory and cardiac motion poses significant challenges for the accurate delivery of radiotherapy to both the thorax and the upper abdomen. Modern imaging techniques during radiotherapy simulation and delivery now permit better quantification of organ motion, which in turn reduces tumour and organ at risk position uncertainty. These imaging advances, coupled with respiratory correlated radiotherapy delivery techniques, have led to the development of a range of approaches to manage respiratory motion. This review summarises the key strategies of image-guided respiratory motion management with a focus on lung and liver radiotherapy.

Purpose The IDEAL-CRT phase 1/2 multicenter trial of isotoxically dose-escalated concurrent chemoradiation for stage II/III non-small cell lung cancer investigated two 30-fraction schedules of 5 and 6 weeks’ duration. We report toxicity, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for both schedules, with long-term follow-up for the 6-week schedule. Methods and Materials Patients received isotoxically individualized tumor radiation doses of 63 to 71 Gy in 5 weeks or 63 to 73 Gy in 6 weeks, delivered concurrently with 2 cycles of cisplatin and vinorelbine. Eligibility criteria were the same for both schedules. Results One-hundred twenty patients (6% stage IIB, 68% IIIA, 26% IIIB, 1% IV) were recruited from 9 UK centers, 118 starting treatment. Median prescribed doses were 64.5 and 67.6 Gy for the 36 and 82 patients treated using the 5- and 6-week schedules. Grade ≥3 pneumonitis and early esophagitis rates were 3.4% and 5.9% overall and similar for each schedule individually. Late grade 2 esophageal toxicity occurred in 11.1% and 17.1% of 5- and 6-week patients. Grade ≥4 adverse events occurred in 17 (20.7%) 6-week patients but no 5-week patients. Four adverse events were grade 5, with 2 considered radiation therapy related. After median follow-up of 51.8 and 26.4 months for the 6- and 5-week schedules, median OS was 41.2 and 22.1 months, respectively, and median PFS was 21.1 and 8.0 months. In exploratory analyses, OS was significantly associated with schedule (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.98; P = .04) and fractional clinical/internal target volume receiving ≥95% of the prescribed dose (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.00; P = .05). PFS was also significantly associated with schedule (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.86; P = .01). Conclusions Toxicity in IDEAL-CRT was acceptable. Survival was promising for 6-week patients and significantly longer than for 5-week patients. Survival might be further lengthened by following the 6-week schedule with an immune agent, motivating further study of such combined optimized treatments.

BackgroundApproximately 15%–20% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases present with stage I disease. Surgical resection traditionally offers the best chance of a cure but some patients will not have this treatment due to older age, comorbidities or personal choice. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become an established curative intent treatment option for patients who are not selected for or do not choose surgery. The aim of this study is to compare survival at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years for patients who received either lobectomy or SABR.MethodsWe used data from the 2015 National Lung Cancer Audit database and linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and the radiotherapy dataset to identify patients with NSCLC stage IA-IB and performance status (PS) 0–2 who underwent surgery or SABR treatment. We assessed the likelihood of death at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 year after diagnosis and procedure date to observe survival between two patient groups.ResultsWe identified 2373 patients in our cohort, 476 of whom had SABR. The median difference between date of diagnosis and date of treatment for surgery patients was 17 days while for SABR patients it was 73 days. Increasing age and worsening PS were associated with having SABR rather than surgery. Survival between the two treatment modalities was similar early on but by 1-year people who had surgery did better than those who had SABR (adjusted ORs 2.12, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.31). This difference persisted at 2 years and when the analysis was restricted to patients aged ConclusionOur analysis suggests that patients who have lobectomy have a better survival compared with SABR patients; however, we found considerable delays in patients receiving SABR which may contribute to poorer long-term outcomes with this treatment option. Reducing these delays should be a key focus in development and reorganisation of services.

Blood-based assays have shown increasing ability to detect circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patients with early-stage cancer. However, detection of ctDNA in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has continued to prove challenging. We performed retrospective analysis to quantify ctDNA levels in a cohort of 100 patients with early-stage NSCLC prior to treatment with curative intent enrolled in the LUCID study (NCT04153526). Where tumour tissue was available for whole exome sequencing, mutations identified were used to define patient-specific sequencing assays. For those 90 patients, plasma cell-free DNA was sequenced to high depth across capture panels targeting a median of 328 mutations specific to each patient. Data was analysed using Integration of Variant Reads (INVAR), detecting ctDNA in 66.7% of patients, including 52.7% (29 of 55) patients with stage I disease and >88% detection for patients with stage II and III disease (16/18 and 15/17). ctDNA was detected in plasma at fractional concentrations as low as 9.1×10−6, and in patients with tumour volumes as low as 0.23 cm3. A 36-gene sequencing panel (InVisionFirst-Lung™) was used to analyse plasma DNA in 27 samples including the 10 cases without tumour exome data, and detected ctDNA in 59% of samples tested (16 of 27). Across the entire cohort, detection rates were higher in squamous cell carcinoma patients compared to adenocarcinoma patients (81% vs. 59%). Detection of ctDNA prior to treatment was associated with significantly shorter time free from relapse, across all patients and in patient subgroups, with Hazard Ratios >11 for selected patient subsets. Our analysis indicates that for patients with stage I NSCLC, the median ctDNA fraction in plasma is approx. 12 parts per million (0.0012%). This indicates the limits of detection that would be required for ctDNA-based liquid biopsies to detect ctDNA in the majority of patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Aims We present the first analysis of the management and outcomes of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) conducted in England using National Lung Cancer Audit data. Materials and methods Patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC in 2016 were identified. Linked datasets (including Hospital Episode Statistics, the National Radiotherapy Dataset, the Systemic Anti-Cancer Dataset, pathology reports and death certificate data) were used to categorise the treatment received. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were obtained, with survival defined from the date of diagnosis to the date of death. Results In total, 6276 cases of stage III NSCLC were analysed: 3827 stage IIIA and 2449 stage IIIB; 1047 (17%) patients were treated with radical radiotherapy with 676 (11%) of these also receiving chemotherapy. Twenty per cent of patients with stage IIIA disease underwent surgery, with half of these also receiving chemotherapy, predominantly delivered in the adjuvant setting. Of note, 2148 (34%) patients received palliative-intent treatment and 2265 (36%) received no active anti-cancer treatment. The 1-year survival was 32.9% (37.4% for stage IIIA), with the highest survival seen for those patients receiving chemotherapy and surgery. Conclusions We highlight important gaps in the optimal care of patients with stage III NSCLC in England. Multimodality treatment with either surgery or radical radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy was delivered to less than one-fifth of patients, even though these regimens are considered optimal. Timely access to specialist resources and staff, the practice of effective shared decision making and challenging preconceptions have the potential to optimise management.

Background and purpose Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for lung plans requires 4DCT. Most radiotherapy centres use this to determine an internal target volume (ITV), despite studies suggesting that planning on a mid-ventilation (Mid-V) phase can reduce target volumes. The purpose of this study is two-fold: to determine whether the Mid-V approach provides adequate coverage and to discuss methods to enable the Mid-V approach to be applied more widely. Method 4D scans of 79 patients were outlined on every phase. The mid-V phase was identified. Margins were determined from the range of motion, and plans generated with a 55 Gy prescription. A grid-based method was used to get the probability of tumour coverage in the presence of systematic and random uncertainties, with and without blurring for breathing motion. Results For the Mid-V plans with the margins calculated from the van-Herk formula, after blurring doses for breathing, the coverage (dose covering 95% of the CTV 95% of the time) was greater than for plans with isotropic 5 mm margins uncorrected for breathing (58.2 Gy v 57.3 Gy). Similar results were obtained for a linear margin chosen as 0.15 of the breathing range. Deformable contour propagation in a commercial outlining system (ProSoma) identified the same mid-V phase in the majority of cases. Conclusion Our results confirm that a mid-V approach can be used to reduce the PTV size, with no loss of tumour coverage. We propose the use of a simplified margin formula equal to the margin ignoring breathing plus 0.15 of the range of motion.

IntroductionData from the National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) often show variation in outcomes between lung cancer units which are not entirely explained by case mix. We explore the association between the organisation of services and patient outcome.MethodsDetails of service provision were collected via an electronic survey in June 2017. An overall organisational score derived from eleven key service factors from national lung cancer commissioning guidance was calculated for each organisation. The results for each hospital were linked to their patient outcome results from the 2015 NLCA cases. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to link the organisational score to patient outcomes.ResultsLung cancer unit organisational audit scores varied from 0 to 11. Thirty-eight (29%) units had a score of 0–4, 64 (50%) had a score of 5–7 and 27 (21%) had a score of 8–11. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that, compared with an organisational score of 0–4, patients seen at units with a score of 8–11 had higher 1-year survival (adjusted OR (95% CI)=2.30 (1.04 to 5.08), pConclusionNational variation in the provision of services and workforce remain. We provide evidence that adherence to the national lung commissioning guidance has the potential to improve patient outcomes within the current service structure.

IntroductionLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality, comprising the largest national cancer disease burden in Australia and New Zealand. Regional reports identify substantial evidence-practice gaps, unwarranted variation from best practice, and variation in processes and outcomes of care between treating centres. The Australia and New Zealand Lung Cancer Registry (ANZLCR) will be developed as a Clinical Quality Registry to monitor the safety, quality and effectiveness of lung cancer care in Australia and New Zealand.Methods and analysisPatient participants will include all adults >18 years of age with a new diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SCLC, thymoma or mesothelioma. The ANZLCR will register confirmed diagnoses using opt-out consent. Data will address key patient, disease, management processes and outcomes reported as clinical quality indicators. Electronic data collection facilitated by local data collectors and local, state and federal data linkage will enhance completeness and accuracy. Data will be stored and maintained in a secure web-based data platform overseen by registry management. Central governance with binational representation from consumers, patients and carers, governance, administration, health department, health policy bodies, university research and healthcare workers will provide project oversight.Ethics and disseminationThe ANZLCR has received national ethics approval under the National Mutual Acceptance scheme. Data will be routinely reported to participating sites describing performance against measures of agreed best practice and nationally to stakeholders including federal, state and territory departments of health. Local, regional and (bi)national benchmarks, augmented with online dashboard indicator reporting will enable local targeting of quality improvement efforts.

Introduction Surgery is the preferred treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) while stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be applied in patients with major comorbidity or high age. We evaluated the association between age and treatment utilization for early-stage NSCLC in patients diagnosed in 2015–2016 in three European countries. Patients and methods Information was retrieved from population-based registries in England, Norway and the Netherlands. Treatment patterns and two-year overall survival rates for 105,124 patients with clinical stage I were analysed by age-group. Results Surgical resection rates were higher in Norway (55%) and England (53%) than in the Netherlands (47%), and decreased with increasing age. SBRT use was highest in the Netherlands (41%), followed by Norway (29%) and England (12%). In the Netherlands, SBRT was the prevailing treatment in patients aged 70 years or older. In octogenarians, the proportion not receiving curative intent treatment was 53% in England, versus 35% in Norway and 22% in the Netherlands. Two-year survival rates were better for surgery than for SBRT and slightly better in Norway. Conclusion In patients aged 70 years or older, the proportion not receiving any curative treatment remains substantial, and differs significantly between countries. Measures to address these disparities are needed.

Introduction Optimal management of people with advanced NSCLC depends on accurate identification of predictive markers. Yet, real-world data in this setting are limited. We describe the impact, timeliness, and outcomes of molecular testing for patients with advanced NSCLC and good performance status in England. Methods In collaboration with Public Health England, patients with stages IIIB to IV NSCLC, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, in England, between June 2017 and December 2017, were identified. All English hospitals were invited to record information. Results A total of 60 of 142 invited hospitals in England participated in this study and submitted data on 1157 patients. During the study period, 83% of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma underwent molecular testing for three recommended predictive biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, and programmed death-ligand 1). A total of 80% of patients with nonsquamous carcinomas on whom biomarker testing was performed had adequate tissue for analysis on initial sampling. First-line treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor was received by 71% of patients with adenocarcinoma and a sensitizing EGFR mutation and by 59% of those with an ALK translocation. Of patients with no driver mutation and a programmed death-ligand 1 expression of greater than or equal to 50%, 47% received immunotherapy. Conclusions We present a comprehensive data set for molecular testing in England. Although molecular testing is well established in England, timeliness and uptake of targeted therapies should be improved.

SummaryThe UK has the highest incidence of mesothelioma in the world, but services vary across the country partly due to uneven geographical distribution of cases. The Mesothelioma UK-funded national organisational audit has highlighted challenges in accessing diagnostic procedures such as thoracoscopy, as well as identifying examples of best practice, including access to clinical trials and specialist therapeutic procedures. To ensure equitable and optimal patient care, cancer alliances should have established referral pathways to specialist multidisciplinary team (MDT) services for discussion of all mesothelioma patients.

Introduction The National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) has previously demonstrated variation in provision of local services which relate to patient outcomes. As part of the National Mesothelioma Audit (funded by Mesothelioma UK), we have carried out an organisational audit across the UK to investigate access to services and organisation of multidisciplinary teams for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients. Methods Lung cancer clinical leads across the United Kingdom were invited to complete an online survey. Email reminders were sent at intervals over a 6-week period, and the specialist nursing network was used to further encourage participation. Results were analysed in Microsoft Excel. Result Overall there were 125 responses, equivalent to a 75% response rate (England 105, Wales 9, Scotland 7, N. Ireland 4). 46% of respondents stated that they see their MPM patients in the lung cancer clinic with only 13% having a specific pleural clinic. Access to investigation and treatment is shown in table 1. 78% reported routinely staging patients according to IASLC TNM v8 and 94% reported routinely recording the pathological subtype of mesothelioma. 21% of organisations perform a PET-CT scan, and 17% use biomarkers as part of the diagnostic assessment, although the survey did not distinguish between routine and exceptional use. A tissue biopsy is carried if pleural cytology suggests MPM routinely in 61%, sometimes in 34% and rarely in 5%. 95% of organisations routinely discuss MPM cases in the local lung cancer MDT. Whilst only 22% had a local MPM specialist MDT, 49% routinely discuss MPM patients in a regional specialist MDT. 19 of these regional specialist MDTs were identified through the survey (England 17, Wales 1, Scotland 1). 84% responded that the lung CNS acted as a key worker on MPM patients with only 14% having a mesothelioma specific CNS. Conclusion Access to key investigations are treatment are generally good. It is interesting that PET-CT and biomarkers are used so frequently despite not being recommended in BTS guidelines. 78% staging and 94% subtyping are considerably better (54% and 57% respectively) directly measured in the last NMA audit, perhaps reflecting genuine improvements in practice, or alternatively over-optimistic assessment of local practice. A second phase of this audit will look in detail at the self-declared specialist MDTs.

Aims Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is now considered the standard of care for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The English National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) collects data on all patients diagnosed with lung cancer, including information on treatment. We wanted to compare outcomes for patients with stage I NSCLC treated with radical radiotherapy with either SABR or fractionated radiotherapy. Materials and methods All patients diagnosed with stage I NSCLC in 2015 and 2016 were identified from the NCRAS dataset, validated by the National Lung Cancer Audit, and their treatment data were collated. For patients who received radiotherapy, those receiving radical dose fractionations, including SABR, were identified through linkage to the national Radiotherapy Dataset. Clinical outcomes for those receiving SABR or more fractionated radical radiotherapy were compared using univariate and fully adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Results In total, 12 384 patients with stage I NSCLC were identified during the study period; 53.5% underwent surgical resection, 24.3% received no documented treatment, 18.6% received radical radiotherapy and 3.5% received other non-curative-intent treatments. For those receiving radical radiotherapy, 69% received SABR and 31% received fractionated treatment. The hazard ratio of death for the 1587 patients who received SABR was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.61–0.79) compared with 717 patients who received radical fractionated radiotherapy; this benefit was seen for both stage Ia and stage Ib disease. The median overall survival was also longer for SABR versus radical radiotherapy (715 days versus 648 days). Exploratory travel time analysis shows that compared with stage I NSCLC patients receiving SABR, those receiving fractionated radiotherapy and those receiving no active treatment would have to travel longer and further to reach their nearest radiotherapy SABR centre. Conclusion This study adds to the data that SABR has a survival benefit when compared with fractionated radical radiotherapy. Although the use of SABR increased in England over this study period, it has still not reached levels of use seen in other countries. This study also highlights that one quarter of stage I NSCLC patients overall received no active treatment.

Background One possible explanation for poor survival in lung cancer patients in the UK is under-utilisation of curative-intent treatment. We carried out a spotlight audit to understand why eligible patients do not receive surgical treatment and whether national guidelines for assessment of early-stage lung cancer were being adhered to. Methods Details of patients in England with stage I/II NSCLC and a performance status of 0–1 who did not undergo surgical treatment were extracted from the NLCA dataset and used to populate a web-based portal developed in conjunction with the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS). Trusts were invited to populate their cases with additional data. Results 82 of 142 trusts in England took part in the audit and data on 775 patients was suitable for analysis (67% stage I and 33% stage II). 46% of patients did receive treatment with curative intent in the form of SABR or radical radiotherapy (including CHART). 8% received other anti-cancer therapy, and 46% received best supportive care. As expected, age over 75 independently predicted best supportive care, even after other factors associated with age (such as co-morbidity and PS) are taken into account. 31% of patients did not have surgery owing to patient choice and, of these, 66% preferred SABR or other radical radiotherapy, while the remainder elected for no treatment. Only 2% of patients had a second surgical opinion, 14% had a CPEX, 34% had an echocardiogram and 11% had a V/Q scan. Very few patients had a shuttle walk test, or had thoracoscore or a formal cardiac risk assessed. 1 year survival for patients having best supportive care was 37%, for SABR it was 67%, for radical radiotherapy it was 45% and for those undergoing palliative radiotherapy was 27%. After adjustment for age, PS, stage, deprivation index and comorbidity index (ACE-27), both SABR and radical radiotherapy improved survival compared with best supportive care. Conclusions Although nearly half the patients did receive an alternative treatment with curative intent, patient choice is a common reason for not receiving surgery. It is crucial that patients are assessed according to best practice and that information about their options is delivered and discussed appropriately.

Background Most lung cancer patients with symptoms have advanced disease. Early stage disease, treatable with curative intent, is often asymptomatic and goes undetected. Currently there is no screening programme for lung cancer in England. We aimed to determine what percentage of patients treated with curative intent are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. Methods We analysed the presentation of lung cancer patients treated with curative intent by surgical resection (April 2017- March 2018) or radical (chemo) radiotherapy (January – December 2016) in our tertiary thoracic oncology service. For those whose lung cancer was an incidental finding we determined how many would have been eligible for CT screening using the LLPv2.01 and USPTF2 models. Results Of 206 patients who received treatment with potential curative intent (177 surgical resection, 21 radiotherapy, 8 chemoradiotherapy), 99 were symptomatic including 8 with thromboembolic disease. The most common symptom was cough. 107 patients were initially classed as ‘asymptomatic’ although 26 subsequently recalled symptoms attributable to their underlying malignancy (e.g. presented with weight loss leading to GI investigations) so for subsequent analyses they were included in the symptomatic group (total n=125). Of the remaining 81 patients who were truly asymptomatic, 9 were under imaging surveillance in a clinical trial or following previous lung cancer surgery, leaving 72 who had an incidental finding of lung cancer through an unrelated presentation or investigation (e.g. post STEMI or AAA surveillance). Median age and smoking history were similar between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (table 1). By stage, 67/72 (93.1%) of asymptomatic patients had stage 1 disease compared with 78/125 (62.4%) in the symptomatic group (p Conclusions In our tertiary lung cancer service 35% (72/206) patients treated with curative intent were asymptomatic at presentation having been detected during treatment/investigations for non-malignant conditions. Patients in the asymptomatic group were more likely to have stage 1 disease. Between 39% and 47% of asymptomatic cases would have met criteria for lung cancer screening. References https://secure2.utlnet.co.uk/mylungrisk/welcome.aspx https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/lung-cancer-screening

8517 Background: Liquid biopsies based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis are being investigated for detection of residual disease and recurrence. Conclusive evidence for utility of ctDNA in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is awaited. Due to low ctDNA levels in early-stage disease or post-treatment, effective methods require high analytical sensitivity to detect mutant allele fractions (MAF) below 0.01%. Methods: We analysed 363 plasma samples from 88 patients with NSCLC recruited to the LUng cancer CIrculating tumour DNA (LUCID) study, with disease stage I (49%), II (28%) and III (23%). 62% were adenocarcinomas. Plasma was collected before and after treatment, and at 3, 6 and 9 months after surgery (N = 69) or chemoradiotherapy (N = 19). Additional plasma was collected at disease relapse for 17 patients. Median follow-up was 3 years, and 40 patients progressed or died of any cause. We employed the RaDaR™ assay, a highly sensitive personalized assay using deep sequencing of up to 48 tumor-specific variants. Variants identified by tumor exome analysis were tested by deep sequencing of tumor tissue and buffy coat DNA to verify somatic mutations and exclude clonal hematopoiesis. The RaDaR assay demonstrated 90% sensitivity at 0.001% MAF in analytical validation studies. Results: ctDNA was detected in 26% of samples, at median MAF of 0.047% (range: 0.0007% to > 2%), and prior to treatment in 87%, 77% and 24% for disease stage III, II and I respectively. For 62 patients, plasma was collected at a landmark timepoint, between 2 weeks and 4 months after initial treatment. ctDNA detection at the landmark timepoint was strongly predictive of clinical disease relapse, with Hazard Ratio of 20.7 (CI: 7.7-55.5, p-value < 0.0001). All 11 cases with ctDNA detected at landmark had disease progression, a median of 121 days after detection, and these included all 8 patients that relapsed within 300 days of treatment. Across 27 patients whose disease progressed during the study, ctDNA was detected at any timepoint post-treatment in 17 cases, with a median lead time of 203 days, and up to 741 days prior to clinical progression. ctDNA was detected post-treatment, in 13 of the 15 patients that progressed and had ctDNA detected prior to treatment. Conclusions: Our results support an emerging paradigm shift, by demonstrating that liquid biopsies can reliably detect recurrence of NSCLC at a preclinical stage, many months before clinical progression, thereby offering the opportunity for earlier therapeutic intervention. Clinical trial information: NCT04153526.

Introduction Overall survival of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor as patients are frequently diagnosed at late stage. The evaluation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been shown to offer a non-invasive method for cancer detection. However, detection rates of ctDNA in patients with early stage cancers have been low. The distribution of ctDNA levels in this population is unknown, and the analytical requirements for a test to detect the majority of cancers cannot be defined. Methods The LUCID study (LUng cancer - CIrculating tumour DNA study) recruited 100 patients with stage I-IIIB NSCLC according to the TNM 7th edition and collected plasma samples before and after radical treatment by surgery or radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy with curative intent. To measure levels of ctDNA in patients with early stage disease and very low tumor burden we developed a method for INtegration of VAriant Reads (INVAR), which uses sequencing data across hundreds to thousands of tumor-mutated loci to detect ctDNA in plasma samples at high sensitivity. We applied INVAR to 90 of the patients from the LUCID study, where tumor sequencing data was available. To measure ctDNA in the remaining LUCID patients, we applied the InVision® amplicon-based plasma sequencing assay. Results Across the 100 patients, ctDNA signals were observed in 67% of samples obtained prior to treatment. ctDNA was detected in 66% of cases, with ctDNA levels as low as 9.1x10-6 (9 parts per million), at a detection threshold with 95% specificity. ctDNA was detected in 52% of 60 patients with stage I NSCLC and in 88% of 40 patients with stage II/III disease. Analyzing different histological subtypes, ctDNA was detected in 79% of squamous cell carcinomas and 60% of adenocarcinomas. We found a good agreement when comparing the ctDNA results obtained from INVAR and the InVision® assay. Conclusions Our findings suggest that an assay with sensitivity to below 10 parts per million may be able to detect ctDNA in as many as 2/3 of patients with early stage NSCLC prior to treatment, including the majority of adenocarcinoma cases. Additionally, patient-specific analysis of ctDNA has the potential to aid in longitudinal cancer monitoring and in detection of low tumor burden and minimal residual disease. We aim to apply this approach to serial samples obtained through the LUCID study to investigate its application in treatment management. Citation Format: Katrin Heider, Jonathan C. Wan, Davina Gale, Andrea Ruiz-Valdepenas, Florent Mouliere, James Morris, Nagmi R. Qureshi, Wendi Qian, Jerome Wulff, Nikolaos Demiris, Karen Howarth, Emma Green, Viona Rundell, Tim Eisen, Wendy Cooper, Christopher G. Smith, Charles Massie, Susan Harden, Doris M. Rassl, Robert C. Rintoul, Nitzan Rosenfeld. ctDNA detection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 736.

Introduction Identification of minimal residual disease (MRD) following curative intervention of localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) holds promise for identifying patients who are at higher risk of relapse and who would benefit from adjuvant treatment. Current routine clinical practice involves serial radiographic imaging following surgery to detect macroscopic disease. Liquid biopsy can identify patients who have MRD without macroscopic disease. Currently available assays have only identified circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in a limited number of cases with early stage NSCLC. More sensitive methods are needed to accurately identify the majority of patients who will relapse. Here we evaluate the performance of InVision®MRD, a personalized sequencing assay for plasma cell-free DNA, for detection of ctDNA in patients with early-stage NSCLC undergoing treatment with curative intent. Methods InVision®MRD is a highly sensitive in vitro diagnostic assay, currently available for research use only (RUO), that can detect the presence of tumor DNA traces in cell-free DNA from plasma samples of cancer patients. InVision®MRD identifies tumor-specific variants from exome sequencing of tumor tissue and tracks them in plasma specimens by multiplex PCR and high-depth next-generation sequencing. We evaluated the detection of ctDNA in plasma samples collected from the LUng cancer - CIrculating tumor DNA (LUCID) study, which collected plasma samples from 100 patients with NSCLC stages I-III who underwent radical treatment with curative intent, either surgery or radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Of patients in the LUCID study, 60% had stage I NSCLC and 40% patients had stage II/III disease, according to TNM 7th edition. Results To evaluate the InVision®MRD assay, a subset of samples from the LUCID study were analyzed. Samples were collected before and after surgery and chemo-radiotherapy from patients with early-stage NSCLC. Using multiplexed analysis of 48 patient-specific variants and high-depth sequencing, ctDNA was detected in 50% of pre-treatment samples analyzed from the first set of 18 patients, at ctDNA fractions ranging from 20 ppm (equivalent to 0.002%) to 19576 ppm (equivalent to 1.958%). Conclusions These findings highlight an opportunity to improve ctDNA detection for early stage NSCLC using a patient-specific plasma sequencing assay. Initial detection rates have reached 50% for patients with early-stage disease prior to treatment, including detection of ctDNA to levels as low as a few parts per million. Together with further data to be presented, this suggests a possible route to improving treatment for early stage NSCLC by detection of residual disease post treatment and for monitoring for early detection of relapse. Citation Format: Katrin Heider, Davina Gale, Andrea Ruiz-Valdepenas, Giovanni Marsico, Garima Sharma, Malcolm Perry, Robert Osborne, Karen Howarth, Tadd Lazarus, Viona Rundell, Jelena Belic, Jerome Wulff, Susan Harden, Doris M. Rassl, Robert C. Rintoul, Nitzan Rosenfeld. Sensitive detection of ctDNA in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients with a personalized sequencing assay [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 735.

e15560 Background: Detection of residual circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patient plasma following curative intervention for localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could identify patients who are at higher risk of relapse. These patients may benefit from adjuvant treatment, even if they have no macroscopic disease identified by radiographic imaging, which is the current standard of care. Here we evaluate the performance of the Inivata personalized sequencing assays to detect ctDNA in a cohort of 90 patients with early-stage NSCLC undergoing treatment with curative intent. Methods: The Inivata assay uses a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing platform, to identify tumor-specific variants from exome sequencing of tumor tissue and to track up to 48 patient-specific mutations in plasma specimens by multiplex PCR and ultra-high-depth next-generation sequencing. Samples from 90 patients with Stage I-III NSCLC who underwent radical treatment with curative intent, either surgery or radiotherapy ± chemotherapy, were collected as part of the LUng cancer - CIrculating tumor DNA (LUCID) study. Results: 350 plasma samples from 90 patients were analyzed using the Inivata assay, including samples collected before and after treatment and at subsequent follow-up visits. ctDNA was detected in pre-treatment samples in 38% of 32 patients (12/32) with Stage I NSCLC and in 90% of 21 patients (19/21) with Stage II/III disease, at allele fractions ranging from 6 parts per million (ppm, equivalent to 0.0006%) to over 20,000 ppm (equivalent to 2%). In plasma samples collected post-treatment, ctDNA was detected in close to 50% of cases. Conclusions: These findings highlight the Inivata assay is a sensitive method for detection of residual ctDNA and recurrence in early stage NSCLC. Initial detection rates ranged from 38% in Stage I disease to 90% for patients with Stage II/III disease prior to treatment, including detection of ctDNA to levels as low as a few parts per million. ctDNA was detected in at least one post-treatment timepoint in close to 50% patients. Together with additional data to be presented from the full 90 patient cohort, this suggests a possible route to improving treatment and designs of adjuvant trials for early stage NSCLC by detection of residual disease post-treatment and monitoring for early detection of relapse.

Doctoral curriculum seminars are important contexts to engage educators in reflective practice for transformation of thought and practice. Thus, a semester-long curriculum and instruction doctoral seminar course in an urban mid-western university was used to study a group of educators’ qualitatively differing conceptions of curriculum. As part of the assignment, all twelve educators maintained a self-reflective journal to explore their and their peers’ evolving conceptions of curriculum. Based on journal recordings, they submitted two reflective papers, each five pages long. Thus, for this research study, twenty-four papers were collected and subjected to phenomenographic analysis. Phenomenography is a qualitative approach which depicts what and how people within the same community of practice experience, perceive, conceptualize, and understand a particular phenomenon. Based on educators’ reflections, three descriptive categories of curriculum were depicted, all focusing on student learning. The study implied that twenty-first-century curriculum theorists, as part of their task, should engage educators to reflect on curriculum related to student learning; document, interpret, and represent educators’ voices on curricular issues; and become part of their curricular lives as they explore and question curriculum for their professional growth.

In 2014, the method of data collection from NHS trusts in England for the National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) was changed from a bespoke dataset called LUCADA (Lung Cancer Data). Under the new contract, data are submitted via the Cancer Outcome and Service Dataset (COSD) system and linked additional cancer registry datasets. In 2014, trusts were given opportunity to submit LUCADA data as well as registry data. 132 NHS trusts submitted LUCADA data, and all 151 trusts submitted COSD data. This transitional year therefore provided the opportunity to compare both datasets for data completeness and reliability. We linked the two datasets at the patient level to assess the completeness of key patient and treatment variables. We also assessed the interdata agreement of these variables using Cohen's kappa statistic, κ. We identified 26 001 patients in both datasets. Overall, the recording of sex, age, performance status and stage had more than 90% agreement between datasets, but there were more patients with missing performance status in the registry dataset. Although levels of agreement for surgery, chemotherapy and external-beam radiotherapy were high between datasets, the new COSD system identified more instances of active treatment. There seems to be a high agreement of data between the datasets, and the findings suggest that the registry dataset coupled with COSD provides a richer dataset than LUCADA. However, it lagged behind LUCADA in performance status recording, which needs to improve over time., New lung cancer data submission method provides a richer dataset http://ow.ly/zE5r30ceaUU

Patients and clinicians are faced with uncertainty as to the optimal treatment strategy for potentially resectable NSCLC in which there is clinical evidence of involvement of the ipsilateral mediastinum. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have failed to demonstrate superiority of one bimodality strategy over another (chemotherapy plus surgery versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy). One trial of trimodality treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery demonstrated an improvement in progression-free, but not overall, survival versus chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There are a number of limitations to the data in this complex and heterogenous patient group. No randomized controlled trial has specifically studied patients with single-station N2 disease versus multistation N2 disease. When discussing treatment for fit patients with potentially resectable cN2 NSCLC, lung cancer teams should consider trimodality treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery or bimodality treatment with chemotherapy and either surgery or radiotherapy. We advocate that all patients see both a thoracic surgeon and the oncology team to discuss these different approaches.

Purpose Treating small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a therapeutic challenge. Experimental studies show that statins exert additive effects with agents, such as cisplatin, to impair tumor growth, and observational studies suggest that statins combined with anticancer therapies delay relapse and prolong life in several cancer types. To our knowledge, we report the first large, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of a statin with standard-of-care for patients with cancer, specifically SCLC. Patients and Methods Patients with confirmed SCLC (limited or extensive disease) and performance status 0 to 3 were randomly assigned to receive daily pravastatin 40 mg or placebo, combined with up to six cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin or carboplatin every 3 weeks, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and toxicity. Results Eight hundred forty-six patients from 91 United Kingdom hospitals were recruited. The median age of recruited patients was 64 years of age, 43% had limited disease, and 57% had extensive disease. There were 758 deaths and 787 PFS events. No benefit was found for pravastatin, either in all patients or in several subgroups. For pravastatin versus placebo, the 2-year OS rate was 13.2% (95% CI, 10.0 to 16.7) versus 14.1% (95% CI, 10.9 to 17.7), respectively, with a hazard ratio of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16; P = .90. The median OS was 10.7 months v 10.6 months, respectively. The median PFS was 7.7 months v 7.3 months, respectively. The median OS (pravastatin v placebo) was 14.6 months in both groups for limited disease and 9.1 months versus 8.8 months, respectively, for extensive disease. Adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusion Pravastatin 40 mg combined with standard SCLC therapy, although safe, does not benefit patients. Our conclusions are the same as those found in all four much smaller, randomized, placebo-controlled trials specifically designed to evaluate statin therapy in patients with cancer.

Overall survival of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor as patients are frequently diagnosed at a late stage. The evaluation of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been shown to offer a non-invasive method for detection of cancer. However, detection rates of ctDNA in patients with early stage cancers, including NSCLC, have been limited due to sampling and sensitivity issues. We developed a novel algorithm for INtegration of VAriant Reads (INVAR), which uses sequencing data across hundreds to thousands of tumour-mutated loci to detect ctDNA in plasma samples at high sensitivity. We applied this to a cohort of stage I-III NSCLC patients recruited in the LUCID study. LUCID is a prospective and observational study of 100 stage I-IIIB NSCLC who are planning to undergo radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy) with curative intent. Plasma samples were collected before and after treatment with curative intent. We analysed a total of 50 patients using patient specific-sequencing panels and detected ctDNA in 78% of cases before treatment, at ctDNA fractions as low as 1.7x10-5. For 17 of those patients staging information was available. Here, we detected ctDNA in 50% of stage I patients (split evenly between stages IA and B) and 100% of stage II and III patients. We also applied INVAR to whole exome and shallow whole genome sequencing data from plasma samples, and showed that this algorithm can be used to detect low ctDNA fractions in such data. Our findings highlight an opportunity to improve ctDNA detection in early stage NSCLC by using patient specific sequencing information. Additionally, our algorithm has the potential to aid in longitudinal cancer monitoring and is applicable to a variety of sequencing data types. We aim to apply this approach to serial samples obtained through the LUCID study to investigate its application in the treatment management. Citation Format: Katrin Heider, Jonathan C. Wan, Davina Gale, Florent C. Mouliere, Wendi Qian, Angels Kateb, Gail Doughton, Nicola Ramenatte, Ruth Tysoe, Christopher G. Smith, Doris M. Rassl, Susan Harden, Robert C. Rintoul, Charles Massie, Nitzan Rosenfeld. Improved ctDNA detection in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1377.

Introduction: The National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) was introduced in 2004 in the UK in order to collect data to improve the standard of care for patients. During this time, it has become important to refine the pathological phenotype of non-small cell lung cancer to determine optimum systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT), clinical trial eligibility and decision to genotype. Methods: Using data submitted to the NLCA between 2009-14, we calculated the total number of cases submitted, the proportion of cases receiving a pathological diagnosis, and the proportion of cases of pathologically-confirmed NSCLC coded as NSCLC not otherwise specified (NOS). Results: The number of cases submitted and the pathological confirmation rate remained stable over the period of investigation. There has been a gradual fall in the NSCLC NOS rate, from 30.5% in 2009 to 12.4% in 2014 (Table 1). Analysis by cancer network however showed a significant variation in the rate from 9.1% to 22.5%, and there was even greater variation across individual hospital trusts (range 0% to 36%), with 45 of 133 trusts failing to achieve a 15% benchmark. Conclusion: There has been a marked improvement in the proportion of patients in England who have their NSCLC subtyped over the last 6 years. However, some organisations continue to report high NOS rates. These organisations should examine their results and implement mechanisms to ensure that best practice in pathological sampling, processing and reporting is being followed.

Purpose To report toxicity and early survival data for IDEAL-CRT, a trial of dose-escalated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. Patients and Methods Patients received tumor doses of 63 to 73 Gy in 30 once-daily fractions over 6 weeks with 2 concurrent cycles of cisplatin and vinorelbine. They were assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to esophageal dose. In group 1, tumor doses were determined by an experimental constraint on maximum esophageal dose, which was escalated following a 6 + 6 design from 65 Gy through 68 Gy to 71 Gy, allowing an esophageal maximum tolerated dose to be determined from early and late toxicities. Tumor doses for group 2 patients were determined by other tissue constraints, often lung. Overall survival, progression-free survival, tumor response, and toxicity were evaluated for both groups combined. Results Eight centers recruited 84 patients: 13, 12, and 10, respectively, in the 65-Gy, 68-Gy, and 71-Gy cohorts of group 1; and 49 in group 2. The mean prescribed tumor dose was 67.7 Gy. Five grade 3 esophagitis and 3 grade 3 pneumonitis events were observed across both groups. After 1 fatal esophageal perforation in the 71-Gy cohort, 68 Gy was declared the esophageal maximum tolerated dose. With a median follow-up of 35 months, median overall survival was 36.9 months, and overall survival and progression-free survival were 87.8% and 72.0%, respectively, at 1 year and 68.0% and 48.5% at 2 years. Conclusions IDEAL-CRT achieved significant treatment intensification with acceptable toxicity and promising survival. The isotoxic design allowed the esophageal maximum tolerated dose to be identified from relatively few patients.