19 results on '"Susan, Urba"'
Search Results
2. A phase 2 trial of surgery with perioperative INGN 201 (Ad5CMV-p53) gene therapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for advanced, resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx: report of the Southwest Oncology Group
- Author
-
George H. Yoo, James Moon, Michael LeBlanc, Fulvio Lonardo, Susan Urba, Harold Kim, Ehab Hanna, Terry Tsue, Joseph Valentino, John Ensley, and Gregory Wolf
- Subjects
Squamous cell carcinoma -- Care and treatment ,Squamous cell carcinoma -- Patient outcomes ,Squamous cell carcinoma -- Research ,Head and neck cancer -- Care and treatment ,Head and neck cancer -- Patient outcomes ,Head and neck cancer -- Research ,Gene therapy -- Patient outcomes ,Gene therapy -- Research ,Chemotherapy -- Patient outcomes ,Chemotherapy -- Research ,Radiotherapy -- Patient outcomes ,Radiotherapy -- Research ,Cancer -- Chemotherapy ,Cancer -- Patient outcomes ,Cancer -- Research ,Health - Published
- 2009
3. Palliative Care in Thoracic Oncology
- Author
-
Susan Urba and Joseph A. Bovi
- Published
- 2018
4. Treatment of Malignant Pheochromocytomas With 131-I Metaiodobenzylguanidine and Chemotherapy
- Author
-
James C. Sisson, Shirley A. Zempel, Brahm Shapiro, Barry L. Shulkin, Susan A. Spaulding, and Susan Urba
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Cancer Research ,Vincristine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cyclophosphamide ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Dacarbazine ,Adrenal Gland Neoplasms ,Urology ,Pheochromocytoma ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,medicine ,Humans ,Radionuclide Imaging ,Aged ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Combined Modality Therapy ,Nitrogen mustard ,Surgery ,Radiation therapy ,3-Iodobenzylguanidine ,Oncology ,chemistry ,Female ,Radiopharmaceuticals ,business ,Progressive disease ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Malignant pheochromocytomas have exhibited partial responses to treatments with 131-I metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and with chemotherapy. The authors combined these two therapeutic methods to determine if beneficial effects from each would be additive. Patients with documented malignant pheochromocytomas were recruited with the intent of administering 131-I MIBG in three substantial amounts of radioactivity at 3-month intervals followed by a year of chemotherapy in which cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, and vincristine were to be given in 21-day cycles. Six patients entered the protocol. After the 131-I MIBG treatments, three patients manifested declines in the presence of tumor (smaller tumor volume or abnormalities on bone and 131-I MIBG scans) and the function of tumor (decreased rate of normetanephrine excretion as the major index). Two patients completed at least 9 months of chemotherapy and showed further reductions in the presence and function of tumors and were classified as having partial responses. Progressive disease afflicted three of the other four subjects. Even though toxicity was minimal from 131-I MIBG, it was sufficient to force reduction in the dosages or duration of chemotherapy. A combination of 131-I MIBG treatments and chemotherapy produced additive effects in reducing malignant pheochromocytomas. Toxicity moderately curtailed the proposed chemotherapy protocol.
- Published
- 1999
5. Adult cancer pain
- Author
-
Robert, Swarm, Amy Pickar, Abernethy, Doralina L, Anghelescu, Costantino, Benedetti, Craig D, Blinderman, Barry, Boston, Charles, Cleeland, Nessa, Coyle, Oscar A, Deleon-Casasola, June G, Eilers, Betty, Ferrell, Nora A, Janjan, Sloan Beth, Karver, Michael H, Levy, Maureen, Lynch, Natalie, Moryl, Barbara A, Murphy, Suzanne A, Nesbit, Linda, Oakes, Eugenie A, Obbens, Judith A, Paice, Michael W, Rabow, Karen L, Syrjala, Susan, Urba, and Sharon M, Weinstein
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Anti-Inflammatory Agents ,Pain ,Opioid ,Article ,Quality of life (healthcare) ,7.1 Individual care needs ,Multidisciplinary approach ,Pain assessment ,Neoplasms ,medicine ,Humans ,Pain Management ,Dosing ,Oncology & Carcinogenesis ,Adverse effect ,Acetaminophen ,Pain Measurement ,Cancer ,Analgesics ,business.industry ,Pain Research ,Neurosciences ,Social Support ,medicine.disease ,Clinical Practice ,Oncology ,National Comprehensive Cancer Network ,Musculoskeletal ,Physical therapy ,Patient Safety ,Management of diseases and conditions ,Chronic Pain ,Cancer pain ,business ,Non-Steroidal - Abstract
Pain is a common symptom associated with cancer and its treatment. Pain management is an important aspect of oncologic care, and unrelieved pain significantly comprises overall quality of life. These NCCN Guidelines list the principles of management and acknowledge the range of complex decisions faced in the management oncologic pain. In addition to pain assessment techniques, these guidelines provide principles of use, dosing, management of adverse effects, and safe handling procedures of pharmacologic therapies and discuss a multidisciplinary approach for the management of cancer pain.
- Published
- 2013
6. Circulating CD4-positive lymphocyte levels as predictor of response to induction chemotherapy in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer
- Author
-
Nicholas A, Dewyer, Gregory T, Wolf, Emily, Light, Francis, Worden, Susan, Urba, Avraham, Eisbruch, Carol R, Bradford, Douglas B, Chepeha, Mark E, Prince, Jeffrey, Moyer, and Jeremy, Taylor
- Subjects
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes ,Male ,Laryngectomy ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Risk Assessment ,Disease-Free Survival ,Article ,Cohort Studies ,Predictive Value of Tests ,parasitic diseases ,Humans ,Neoplasm Invasiveness ,Laryngeal Neoplasms ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Proportional Hazards Models ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Induction Chemotherapy ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,Survival Analysis ,Oropharyngeal Neoplasms ,Logistic Models ,Treatment Outcome ,Female ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Tumor regression after induction chemotherapy (ICT) identifies laryngeal cancers that are responsive to chemoradiation. Patient immune parameters have recently been associated with response to chemotherapy and may identify responding patients. A retrospective analysis was performed to determine if pretreatment, circulating T lymphocyte levels predicted ICT response in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer.Pretreatment, circulating T lymphocyte subpopulations were correlated with response to therapy and survival. Results were compared with similar data from an identical phase II trial involving patients with oropharyngeal cancer.An increased percentage of CD4+ cells predicted response to ICT and suggested improved survival in patients with laryngeal, but not oropharyngeal, cancer. In the combined group of patients, increased CD4 levels predicted response to ICT.These findings demonstrate the potential importance of the immune system in chemotherapy response and clinical outcome. Differences in findings between patients with advanced laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancer may reflect different cellular immunity function in the patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-16+ oropharyngeal cancer.
- Published
- 2013
7. Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy in East Asian patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: Results of an exploratory subgroup analysis of a phase III trial
- Author
-
Susan, Urba, Ruey-Long, Hong, Anwar M, Hossain, Rebecca, Cheng, and Mauro, Orlando
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Guanine ,Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck ,Pemetrexed ,Middle Aged ,Survival Analysis ,Treatment Outcome ,Asian People ,Double-Blind Method ,Glutamates ,Head and Neck Neoplasms ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ,Humans ,Female ,Cisplatin ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,Aged - Abstract
An exploratory subgroup analysis of East Asian (EA) patients in a phase III trial was conducted to assess efficacy and safety trends based on ethnicity.The 795 patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck included 111 EA patients randomized to pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 55) and placebo-cisplatin (n = 56) and 684 non- EA patients randomized to pemetrexed-cisplatin (n = 343) and placebo-cisplatin (n = 341). Treatment differences in median overall survival and progression-free survival were compared using a stratified log-rank test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.The median overall survival in the pemetrexed-cisplatin and placebo-cisplatin arms of the EA group (6.8 and 5.7 months, respectively [P = 0.275]) was similar to that in the global population (7.3 and 6.3 months, respectively [P = 0.082]); the median progression-free survival in the pemetrexed-cisplatin and placebo-cisplatin arms in the EA group (2.8 and 1.9 months, respectively [P = 0.748]) was similar to that in the global population (3.6 and 2.8 months, respectively [P = 0.166]). Compared to the findings in the global population, overall survival for the EA group receiving prior platinum-based therapy was longer (P = 0.042 vs P = 0.065). There was no significant interaction between treatment arms and ethnicity.Consistent with findings in the global population, pemetrexed-cisplatin did not improve survival compared with placebo-cisplatin for the EA group. However, in a subgroup analysis, pemetrexed-cisplatin showed an overall survival advantage in EA patients receiving prior platinum-based therapy.
- Published
- 2012
8. Alternating and concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for unresectable head and neck carcinoma
- Author
-
Allan Thornton, Patrick McLaughlin, Gregory Wolf, Susan Urba, and Arlene Forastiere
- Subjects
Cisplatin ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Radiation ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,medicine.disease ,Acute toxicity ,Surgery ,Radiation therapy ,Regimen ,Concurrent chemotherapy ,Oncology ,medicine ,Mucositis ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,business ,Chronic toxicity ,medicine.drug ,Head and neck carcinoma - Abstract
Between 1987 and 1989, 12 patients with advanced unresectable head and neck carcinoma were entered on a regimen of alternating and concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. During the initial phase, cisplatin (50 mg/m2/day × 3 days) was administered 1 week and alternated with 160 cGy TID radiation week 3. This alternating schedule was repeated once for a total dose of 300 mg/m2 cisplatin and a total radiation dose of 4,800 cGy. Week 9, concurrent cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day × 5 days) was administered with 200 cGy BID radiation to boost ports. In spite of the alternating schedule, acute toxicity from 160 cGy TID was severe and delays secondary to mucositis increased the average duration of therapy to 11 weeks. Unexpected chronic toxicity included 2 of 12 patients with swallowing difficulty due to a sensory neuropathy which was likely a combined modality effect. This had not been reported in previous combined modality studies. A complete response was achieved in 5 of 12 patients and a partial response in 7 of 12 patients. Overall median survival was 17 months. Although the combination of cisplatin and accelerated radiation given in the above dose schedule induced a complete or partial response in all patients, severe toxicity and lack of survival benefit discourage further use of this regimen. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
- Published
- 1993
9. Antiemesis clinical practice guidelines in oncology
- Author
-
David S, Ettinger, Philip J, Bierman, Bob, Bradbury, Georgiana, Ellis, Robert J, Ignoffo, Steve, Kirkegaard, Dwight, Kloth, Amy, Krauss, Mark G, Kris, Dean, Lim, Michael Anne, Markiewicz, Robert, McNulty, Kim, Noonan, Lisa, Stucky-Marshall, Barbara, Todaro, Susan, Urba, and Sally, Yowell
- Subjects
Vomiting ,Neoplasms ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Antiemetics ,Humans ,Guidelines as Topic ,Nausea ,Medical Oncology ,Radiation Injuries ,Algorithms - Published
- 2009
10. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: palliative care
- Author
-
Michael H, Levy, Anthony, Back, Costantino, Benedetti, J Andrew, Billings, Susan, Block, Barry, Boston, Eduardo, Bruera, Sydney, Dy, Catherine, Eberle, Kathleen M, Foley, Sloan Beth, Karver, Sara J, Knight, Sumathi, Misra, Christine S, Ritchie, David, Spiegel, Linda, Sutton, Susan, Urba, Jamie H, Von Roenn, and Sharon M, Weinstein
- Subjects
Neoplasms ,Palliative Care ,Humans ,Guideline Adherence - Published
- 2009
11. A Phase I-II Trial of Continuous-Infusion Cisplatin, Continuous-Infusion 5-Fluorouracil, and VP-16 in Colorectal Carcinoma
- Author
-
Gregory Curt, Michael C. Wiemann, Frank J. Cummings, Susan Urba, Christopher A. Slapak, Paul Calabresi, Nicholas J. Robert, Alan B. Weitberg, Marcia J. Browne, Jeffery W. Clark, and Marshall R. Posner
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Adenocarcinoma ,Gastroenterology ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,medicine ,Mucositis ,Humans ,Infusions, Intravenous ,Etoposide ,Aged ,Cisplatin ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,Remission Induction ,Combination chemotherapy ,Leukopenia ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Thrombocytopenia ,Surgery ,Regimen ,Oncology ,Fluorouracil ,Toxicity ,Drug Evaluation ,Female ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Twenty-nine evaluable patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were treated in a phase I-II trial of combination chemotherapy with a 72-h continuous infusion of cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with an infusion of VP-16 given at 24 and 48 h after the start of therapy. There were five (17 +/- 14%) partial responses lasting 2-6 months (median, 3). Three of these responses occurred among the 10 previously untreated patients. The toxicity of this regimen was pronounced. Four of eight patients with severe neutropenia required hospitalization for infections, two of which were life-threatening; one of six patients with severe thrombocytopenia had a life-threatening hemorrhagic complication; and four patients experienced severe, dose-limiting fatigue. These complications occurred principally with CDDP and VP-16 at doses above 27.5 mg/m2/day and 110 mg/m2/dose, respectively. Mucositis occurred in six patients and limited the dose of 5-FU to 1,300 mg/m2/day. Although the response rate appeared to be high in previously untreated patients, the minimal palliative benefit of treatment and the brief duration of the responses do not compensate for the toxicity observed.
- Published
- 1990
12. Palliative care. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology
- Author
-
Michael H, Levy, Anthony, Back, Sadaf, Bazargan, Costantino, Benedetti, J Andrew, Billings, Susan, Block, Eduardo, Bruera, Michael A, Carducci, Sydney, Dy, Catherine, Eberle, Kathleen M, Foley, Juan-Diego, Harris, Sara J, Knight, Robert, Milch, Michelle, Rhiner, Neal E, Slatkin, David, Spiegel, Linda, Sutton, Susan, Urba, Jamie H, Von Roenn, and Sharon M, Weinstein
- Subjects
Patient Care Team ,Neoplasms ,Palliative Care ,Pain ,Medical Oncology - Published
- 2006
13. Antiemesis
- Author
-
David S, Ettinger, Philip J, Bierman, Bob, Bradbury, Carli C, Comish, Georgiana, Ellis, Robert J, Ignoffo, Steve, Kirkegaard, Dwight D, Kloth, Mark G, Kris, Dean, Lim, Michael Anne, Markiewicz, Robert, McNulty, Lidia, Nabati, Barbara, Todaro, Susan, Urba, and Sally, Yowell
- Subjects
Radiotherapy ,Vomiting ,Morpholines ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Nausea ,Medical Oncology ,Clinical Protocols ,Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists ,Oncology ,Area Under Curve ,Neoplasms ,Antiemetics ,Humans ,Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists ,Drug Interactions ,Aprepitant - Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (emesis) can significantly affect a patient's quality of life, leading to poor adherence with further chemotherapy treatment. In addition, nausea and vomiting can result in other serious complications and deterioration of the patient's status. These guidelines explore the prevention, treatment, and management of various types of emesis experienced by cancer patients, such as breakthrough, radiation-induced, and anticipatory. For the most recent version of the guidelines, please visit NCCN.org
- Published
- 2007
14. A Phase II Study of Imatinib in Patients with Advanced Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.
- Author
-
Huan T. Ha, Julia S. Lee, Susan Urba, Ronald J. Koenig, James Sisson, Thomas Giordano, and Francis P. Worden
- Subjects
IMATINIB ,THYROID cancer patients ,METASTASIS ,DNA microarrays ,GROWTH factors ,DIAGNOSTIC immunohistochemistry ,FOLLOW-up studies (Medicine) ,DISEASE progression - Abstract
Background:Currently, there is no standard treatment for metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). DNA microarray analysis has shown platelet-dervived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) overexpression in ATC relative to well-differentiated thyroid cancer. In p53-mutated/deficient ATC cell lines, cABL is overexpressed, and selective inhibition of cABL results in a cytostatic effect. Imatinib inhibits tyrosine kinase activity of Bcr-ABL and PDGF. We hypothesize that patients with ATC that over-expresses PDGF receptors or cABL will respond to imatinib.Methods:Patients with histologically confirmed ATC who had measurable disease and whose disease expressed PDGF receptors by immunohistochemistry were eligible for study. Imatinib was administered at 400 mg orally twice daily without drug holiday. Response to treatment was assessed every 8 weeks. Patients with complete response, partial responses, or stable disease were treated until disease progression. The study was terminated early due to poor accrual.Results:From February 2004 to May 2007, 11 patients were enrolled and were started on imatinib. At baseline, 4/11 had locoregional disease, 5/11 had distant metastases, and 2/11 had both. Nine of 11 had prior chemoradiation, and 7/11 had thyroidectomy. Eight of 11 were evaluable for response; 4 were excluded for lack of follow-up with radiologic evaluation. The overall response rates at 8 weeks were complete response 0/8, partial response 2/8, and stable disease 4/8. The median time to follow-up was 26 months (ranges 23–30 months). The rate of 6-month progression-free survival was 36% (95% confidence interval, 9%–65%). The rate of 6-month overall survival was 45% (95% confidence interval, 16%–70%). The most common grade 3 toxicity was edema in 25%; other grade 3 toxicities included fatigue and hyponatremia (12.5% each). There were no grade 4 toxicities or treatment related deaths.Conclusions:Imatinib appears to have activity in advanced ATC and is well tolerated. Due to difficulty of accruing patients with a rare malignancy at a single institution, further investigation of imatinib in ATC may be warranted in a multi-institutional setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update.
- Author
-
Sohal DPS, Kennedy EB, Khorana A, Copur MS, Crane CH, Garrido-Laguna I, Krishnamurthi S, Moravek C, O'Reilly EM, Philip PA, Ramanathan RK, Ruggiero JT, Shah MA, Urba S, Uronis HE, Lau MW, and Laheru D
- Subjects
- Clinical Decision-Making, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Metastasis, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Pancreatic Neoplasms drug therapy, Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Abstract
Purpose In 2016, ASCO published a guideline to assist in clinical decision making in metastatic pancreatic cancer for initial assessment after diagnosis, first- and second-line treatment options, palliative and supportive care, and follow-up. The purpose of this update is to incorporate new evidence related to second-line therapy for patients who have experienced disease progression or intolerable toxicity during first-line therapy. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on second-line therapy published between June 2015 and January 2018. Recommendations on other topics covered in the 2016 Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Guideline were endorsed by the Expert Panel. Results Two new studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations For second-line therapy, gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 1, and a favorable comorbidity profile; fluorouracil plus nanoliposomal irinotecan can be offered to patients with first-line treatment with gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel, an ECOG PS of 0 to 1, and a favorable comorbidity profile; fluorouracil plus irinotecan or fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin may be offered when there is a lack of availability of fluorouracil plus nanoliposomal irinotecan; gemcitabine or fluorouracil should be offered to patients with either an ECOG PS of 2 or a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens. Testing select patients for mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability is recommended, and pembrolizumab is recommended for patients with mismatch repair deficiency or high microsatellite instability tumors. Endorsed recommendations from the 2016 version of this guideline for computed tomography, baseline performance status and comorbidity profile, defining goals of care, first-line therapy, and palliative care are also contained within the full guideline text. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.
- Author
-
Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J, Engebretson A, Hong TS, Maitra A, Mohile SG, Mumber M, Schulick R, Shapiro M, Urba S, Zeh HJ, and Katz MHG
- Subjects
- Capecitabine administration & dosage, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Deoxycytidine administration & dosage, Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives, Humans, Pancreatectomy, Gemcitabine, Adenocarcinoma therapy, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Pancreatic Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Purpose To update the Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline published on May 31, 2016. The October 2016 update focuses solely on new evidence that pertains to clinical question 4 of the guideline: What is the appropriate adjuvant regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone an R0 or R1 resection of their primary tumor? Methods The recently published results of a randomized phase III study prompted an update of this guideline. The high quality of the reported evidence and the potential for its clinical impact prompted the Expert Panel to revise one of the guideline recommendations. Results The ESPAC-4 study, a multicenter, international, open-label randomized controlled phase III trial of adjuvant combination chemotherapy compared gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in 730 evaluable patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Median overall survival was improved in the doublet arm to 28.0 months (95% CI, 23.5 to 31.5 months) versus 25.5 months (95% CI, 22.7 to 27.9 months) for gemcitabine alone (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98; P = .032). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both arms, although higher rates of hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea occurred in patients randomly assigned to the doublet arm. Recommendations All patients with resected pancreatic cancer who did not receive preoperative therapy should be offered 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy in the absence of medical or surgical contraindications. The doublet regimen of gemcitabine and capecitabine is preferred in the absence of concerns for toxicity or tolerance; alternatively, monotherapy with gemcitabine or fluorouracil plus folinic acid can be offered. Adjuvant treatment should be initiated within 8 weeks of surgical resection, assuming complete recovery. The remaining recommendations from the original 2016 ASCO guideline are unchanged.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.
- Author
-
Sohal DP, Mangu PB, Khorana AA, Shah MA, Philip PA, O'Reilly EM, Uronis HE, Ramanathan RK, Crane CH, Engebretson A, Ruggiero JT, Copur MS, Lau M, Urba S, and Laheru D
- Subjects
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal diagnostic imaging, Communication, Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Pain Management, Palliative Care, Pancreatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Patient Care Planning, Patient Care Team, Symptom Assessment, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal secondary, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal therapy, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Pancreatic Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer., Methods: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, gastroenterology, palliative care, and advocacy experts to conduct a systematic review of the literature from April 2004 to June 2015. Outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events., Results: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria., Recommendations: A multiphase computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be performed. Baseline performance status and comorbidity profile should be evaluated. Goals of care, patient preferences, treatment response, psychological status, support systems, and symptom burden should guide decisions for treatments. A palliative care referral should occur at first visit. FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin; favorable comorbidity profile) or gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (NAB) -paclitaxel (adequate comorbidity profile) should be offered to patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 to 1 based on patient preference and support system available. Gemcitabine alone is recommended for patients with ECOG PS 2 or with a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens; the addition of capecitabine or erlotinib may be offered. Patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 3 and poorly controlled comorbid conditions should be offered cancer-directed therapy only on a case-by-case basis; supportive care should be emphasized. For second-line therapy, gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with FOLFIRINOX, an ECOG PS 0 to 1, and a favorable comorbidity profile; fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or nanoliposomal irinotecan should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel, ECOG PS 0 to 1, and favorable comorbidity profile, and gemcitabine or fluorouracil should be offered to patients with either an ECOG PS 2 or a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/MetPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki., (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.
- Author
-
Balaban EP, Mangu PB, Khorana AA, Shah MA, Mukherjee S, Crane CH, Javle MM, Eads JR, Allen P, Ko AH, Engebretson A, Herman JM, Strickler JH, Benson AB 3rd, Urba S, and Yee NS
- Subjects
- Humans, Medical Oncology, Societies, Medical, United States, Pancreatic Neoplasms therapy, Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Abstract
Purpose: To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for treatment of patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer., Methods: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, gastroenterology, palliative care, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic review of the literature from January 2002 to June 2015. Outcomes included overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events., Results: Twenty-six randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria., Recommendations: A multiphase computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be performed. Baseline performance status and comorbidity profile should be evaluated. The goals of care, patient preferences, psychological status, support systems, and symptoms should guide decisions for treatments. A palliative care referral should occur at first visit. Initial systemic chemotherapy (6 months) with a combination regimen is recommended for most patients (for some patients radiation therapy may be offered up front) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and a favorable comorbidity profile. There is no clear evidence to support one regimen over another. The gemcitabine-based combinations and treatments recommended in the metastatic setting (eg, fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel) have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials involving locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. If there is local disease progression after induction chemotherapy, without metastasis, then radiation therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy may be offered also with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2 and an adequate comorbidity profile. If there is stable disease after 6 months of induction chemotherapy but unacceptable toxicities, radiation therapy may be offered as an alternative. Patients with disease progression should be offered treatment per the ASCO Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treatment Guideline. Follow-up visits every 3 to 4 months are recommended. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/LAPC and www.asco.org/guidelines/MetPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki., (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.
- Author
-
Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J, Engebretson A, Hong TS, Maitra A, Mohile SG, Mumber M, Schulick R, Shapiro M, Urba S, Zeh HJ, and Katz MH
- Subjects
- Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Medical Oncology, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Societies, Medical, Pancreatic Neoplasms therapy, Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Abstract
Purpose: To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others on potentially curative therapy for patients with localized pancreatic cancer., Methods: ASCO convened a panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, palliative care, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic review of literature from January 2002 to June 2015. Outcomes included overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events., Results: Nine randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria., Recommendations: A multiphase computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis or magnetic resonance imaging should be performed for all patients to assess the anatomic relationships of the primary tumor and for the presence of intra-abdominal metastases. Baseline performance status, comorbidity profile, and goals of care should be evaluated and established. Primary surgical resection is recommended for all patients who have no metastases, appropriate performance and comorbidity profiles, and no radiographic interface between primary tumor and mesenteric vasculature. Preoperative therapy is recommended for patients who meet specific characteristics. All patients with resected pancreatic cancer who did not receive preoperative therapy should be offered 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy in the absence of contraindications. Adjuvant chemoradiation may be offered to patients who did not receive preoperative therapy with microscopically positive margins (R1) after resection and/or who had node-positive disease after completion of 4 to 6 months of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients should have a full assessment of symptoms, psychological status, and social supports and should receive palliative care early. Patients who have completed treatment and have no evidence of disease should be monitored. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/PCPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki., (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.