Search

Polymeric in situ forming depots have emerged as highly promising drug delivery systems for long-acting applications. Their effectiveness is attributed to essential characteristics such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and the ability to form a stable gel or solid upon injection. Moreover, they provide added versatility by complementing existing polymeric drug delivery systems like micro- and nanoparticles. The formulation's low viscosity facilitates manufacturing unit operations and enhances delivery efficiency, as it can be easily administered via hypodermic needles. The release mechanism of drugs from these systems can be predetermined using various functional polymers. To enable unique depot design, numerous strategies involving physiological and chemical stimuli have been explored. Important assessment criteria for in situ forming depots include biocompatibility, gel strength and syringeability, texture, biodegradation, release profile, and sterility. This review focuses on the fabrication approaches, key evaluation parameters, and pharmaceutical applications of in situ forming depots, considering perspectives from academia and industry. Additionally, insights about the future prospects of this technology are discussed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Unexplained sudden cardiac death (SCD) describes SCD with no cause identified. Genetic testing helps to diagnose inherited cardiac diseases in unexplained SCD; however, the associations between pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants of inherited cardiomyopathies (CMs) and arrhythmia syndromes and the risk of unexplained SCD in both White and African American adults living the United States has never been systematically examined., Objective: To investigate cases of unexplained SCD to determine the frequency of P/LP genetic variants of inherited CMs and arrhythmia syndromes., Design, Setting, and Participants: This genetic association study included 683 African American and White adults who died of unexplained SCD and were included in an autopsy registry. Overall, 413 individuals had DNA of acceptable quality for genetic sequencing. Data were collected from January 1995 to December 2015. A total of 30 CM genes and 38 arrhythmia genes were sequenced, and variants in these genes, curated as P/LP, were examined to study their frequency. Data analysis was performed from June 2018 to March 2021., Main Outcomes and Measures: The frequency of P/LP variants for CM or arrhythmia in individuals with unexplained SCD., Results: The median (interquartile range) age at death of the 413 included individuals was 41 (29-48) years, 259 (62.7%) were men, and 208 (50.4%) were African American adults. A total of 76 patients (18.4%) with unexplained SCD carried variants considered P/LP for CM and arrhythmia genes. In total, 52 patients (12.6%) had 49 P/LP variants for CM, 22 (5.3%) carried 23 P/LP variants for arrhythmia, and 2 (0.5%) had P/LP variants for both CM and arrhythmia. Overall, 41 P/LP variants for hypertrophic CM were found in 45 patients (10.9%), 9 P/LP variants for dilated CM were found in 11 patients (2.7%), and 10 P/LP variants for long QT syndrome were found in 11 patients (2.7%). No significant difference was found in clinical and heart characteristics between individuals with or without P/LP variants. African American and White patients were equally likely to harbor P/LP variants., Conclusions and Relevance: In this large genetic association study of community cases of unexplained SCD, nearly 20% of patients carried P/LP variants, suggesting that genetics may contribute to a significant number of cases of unexplained SCD. Our findings regarding both the association of unexplained SCD with CM genes and race-specific genetic variants suggest new avenues of study for this poorly understood entity.

OBJECTIVE: Healing processes, particularly reendothelialization, are essential for vascular homeostasis after plain old balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are commonly used for percutaneous coronary intervention because restenosis rates are reduced as compared with bare metal stents (BMS). However, in addition to understanding the nature of regenerated endothelial cells, concerns over incomplete stent healing persist, and the molecular effects of antiproliferative drug coatings on endothelium remain poorly understood. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We used the rabbit iliac artery model to analyze differences in stent endothelialization in BMS and DES. Histology and immunohistochemistry confirmed that stent coverage was significantly greater in BMS than in DES at 30 days after stent implantation. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed a more immature transcriptomic signature of neointimal endothelial cell harvested from stented arteries in comparison with native and plain old balloon angioplasty– treated arteries. Whereas the genetic signature of BMS was overall proangiogenic with enrichment of genes involved in endothelial proliferation, sprouting, and migration, as well as extracellular matrix assembly, DES-derived endothelial cell showed upregulation of genes associated with angiogenesis inhibition and endothelial activation. CONCLUSIONS: Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis identified unique transcriptional changes within regenerated endothelium after plain old balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. These data suggest unique endothelial transcriptional differences, which characterize the different response of the endothelium to vascular injury and may help explain why long-term responses in DES remain suboptimal.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been applied to vascular coronary devices to avoid neointimal growth and have become the predominant pharmacological agents used to prevent restenosis. mTOR inhibitors can affect not only proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells but also endothelial cells and therefore can result in delayed healing of the vessel including endothelialization. Emerging evidence suggests accelerated atherosclerosis due to the downstream negative effects on endothelial barrier functional recovery. The development of neoatherosclerosis within the neointima of drug-eluting stents can result in late thrombotic events. This type of problematic healing response may open the way for specific mTOR kinase inhibitors, such as ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitors. These inhibitors demonstrate a better healing profile than traditional limus-based drug-eluting stent and their clinical efficacy remains unknown.

The presence of macrophages within the plaque is a defining hallmark of atherosclerosis. Macrophages are exposed to various microenvironments such as oxidized lipids and cytokines which effect their phenotypic differentiation and activation. Classically, macrophages have been divided into two groups: M1 and M2 macrophages induced by T-helper 1 and T-helper 2 cytokines, respectively. However, for a decade, greater phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of these cells have since been reported in various models. In addition to M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes, the concept of additional macrophage phenotypes such as M (Hb), Mox, and M4 has emerged. Understanding the mechanisms and functions of distinct phenotype of macrophages can lead to determination of their potential role in atherosclerotic plaque pathogenesis. However, there are still many unresolved controversies regarding their phenotype and function with respect to atherosclerosis. Here, we summarize and focus on the differential subtypes of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques and their differing functional roles based upon microenvironments such as lipid, intraplaque hemorrhage, and plaque regression.

Introduction : Coronary bifurcation lesions are involved in up to 20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, bifurcation lesion intervention is associated with a high complication rate, and optimal treatment of coronary bifurcation is an ongoing debate. Areas covered : Both different stenting techniques and a variety of devices have been suggested for bifurcation treatment, including the use of conventional coronary stents, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS), drug-eluting balloons (DEB), and stents dedicated to bifurcations. This review will summarize different therapeutic approaches with their advantages and shortcomings, with special emphasis on histopathologic and physiologic effects of each treatment strategy. Expert opinion : Histopathology and clinical data have shown that a more simple treatment strategy is beneficial in bifurcation lesions, achieving superior results. Bifurcation interventions through balloon angioplasty or placement of stents can importantly alter the bifurcation's geometry and accordingly modify local flow conditions. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies have shown that the outcome of bifurcation interventions is governed by local hemodynamic shear conditions. Minimizing detrimental flow conditions as much as possible should be the ultimate strategy to achieve long-term success of bifurcation interventions.

Aims: Vascular calcification is routinely encountered in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and severe coronary calcification is a known predictor of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. However, the histopathologic mechanisms behind such events have not been systematically described., Methods and Results: From our registry of 1211 stents, a total of 134 newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) (Xience, Resolute-Integrity, PROMUS-Element, and Synergy) with duration of implant ≥30 days were histologically analysed. The extent of calcification of the stented lesions was evaluated radiographically and divided into severe (SC, n = 46) and non-severely calcified lesions (NC, n = 88). The percent-uncovered struts per section {SC vs. NC; median 2.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.0-19.0] % vs. 0.0 (IQR 0.0-4.6) %, P = 0.02} and the presence of severe medial tears (MTs) (59% vs. 44%, respectively, P = 0.03) were greater in SC than NC. In addition, SC had a higher prevalence of ≥3 consecutive struts lying directly in contact with surface calcified area (3SC) (52% vs. 8%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that sections with duration of implantation ≤6 months [odds ratio (OR): 7.7, P < 0.0001], 3SC (OR: 6.5, P < 0.0001), strut malapposition (OR: 5.0, P < 0.0001), and lack of MTs (OR: 2.5, P = 0.0005) were independent predictors of uncovered struts. Prevalence of neoatherosclerosis was significantly lower in SC than that of NC (24% vs. 44%, P = 0.02)., Conclusion: Severe calcification, especially surface calcified area is an independent predictor of uncovered struts and delayed healing after newer-generation DES implantation. These data expand of knowledge of the vascular responses of stenting of calcified arteries and suggests further understand of how best to deal with calcification in patients undergoing PCI., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The use of endovascular therapy for peripheral artery disease and coronary artery disease has increased and spread worldwide and is considered as the foremost, guideline-based invasive treatment. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) utilise anti-proliferative drugs similar to drug-eluting stents; however, the do not leave any permanent metallic scaffold. Excipients and drug formulations play a crucial role in innovative DCB technologies and allow for treatment of lesions where stents are not suitable. Although the significance of downstream embolic effects after DCB use remains uncertain, several preclinical studies suggest such side effects might pose safety concerns. Recently, a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of paclitaxel devices suggested an association between increased mortality and paclitaxel device use. Subsequently, unfavourable criticism of paclitaxel devices attracted much attention and gave rise to a discussion about the safety of such devices. In this review, we will focus on the novel DCB technologies from the standpoint of preclinical studies and clinical trials, as well as discuss current controversies regarding the increase in death rates from paclitaxel-coated DCBs versus control devices seen in a recent meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials., Competing Interests: Disclosure: Renu Virmani has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Celonova, Cook Medical, Cordis, CSI, Lutonix Bard, Medtronic, OrbusNeich Medical, CeloNova, SINO Medical Technology, ReCore, Terumo Corporation, W. L. Gore and Spectranetics; and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Celonova, Cook Medical, Cordis, CSI, Edwards Lifescience, Lutonix Bard, Medtronic, OrbusNeich Medical, ReCore, Sinomededical Technology, Spectranetics, Surmodics, Terumo Corporation, W. L. Gore and Xeltis. Aloke V Finn has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Celonova, Cook Medical, CSI, Lutonix Bard, Sinomed and Terumo Corporation; and is a consultant for Amgen, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Celonova, Cook Medical, Lutonix Bard and Sinomed. Yu Sato, Salomé H Kuntz, Dipti Surve, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Atsushi Sakamoto, Anne Cornelissen and Frank Kolodgie have nothing to declare in relation to this article. CVPath Institute has received institutional research support from R01 HL141425 Leducq Foundation Grant, 480 Biomedical, 4C Medical, 4Tech, Abbott, Accumedical, Amgen, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Cardiac Implants, Celonova, Claret Medical, Concept Medical, Cook, CSI, DuNing Inc, Edwards Life Sciences, Emboline, Endotronix, Envision Scientific, Lutonix/Bard, Gateway, Lifetech, Limflo, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Mercator, Merill, Microport Medical, Microvention, Mitraalign, Mitra assist, NAMSA, Nanova, Neovasc, NIPRO, Novogate, Occulotech, OrbusNeich Medical, Phenox, Profusa, Protembis, Qool, Recor, Senseonics, Shockwave, Sinomed, Spectranetics, Surmodics, Symic, Vesper, W.L. Gore and Xeltis., (© Touch Medical Media 2019.)