Search

According to the European Union (EU) Directive 2005/36, the medical specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) exists with two possible formats: dual degree OMFS called Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (DOMFS) - basic medical and basic dental training and single medical degree Maxillofacial Surgery (MFS). Within the EU and across all of Europe, differences in the nature and quality of OMFS training coexist. By implementing the highest possible standards of training, patient care can be improved. To establish quality metrics for an ideal OMFS training programme, the European OMFS Trainee Forum of the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes (UEMS) conducted a Delphi consensus protocol from November 2023 to January 2024. Facilitated by the OMFS Section of UEMS, 57 trainees from 32 countries participated. The process involved the definition of three quality levels using the red, amber, and green (RAG) rating system. Following the Delphi process, 46 domains were identified, including features within training programmes/rotations, teaching and education programmes, training placements, recording of training progression and activity, and external assessment of training programmes. The results were aligned with the UEMS OMFS European Training Requirement (ETR). With the introduction of a RAG rating, trainees and trainers can review their training programmes with the aim of improving them by moving domains from Red to Green. Raising the standard of training will benefit our patients. This initiative could mark a significant step towards the harmonisation of OMFS training, improving quality and ensuring consistent, high-level care throughout Europe., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Online reputation is misattributed in France in academic publications. However, this phenomenon is growing. The objective of this study was to establish an inventory of the e-reputation of French maxillofacial surgeons through the opinions posted on their professional Google® account., Material and Methods: A descriptive study included all the surgeons registered on the list of the French National Medical Council in "maxillofacial surgery and stomatology". Data collection was carried out from February to April 2022., Results: Among the 483 surgeons included, 61.1% had received at least one opinion, the number of per surgeon was 22.2. The average was 4.3/5. Among the 4433 written comments completing the review, 85% were positive. The average response rate of surgeons was 10% and was all the more important as the rating of the opinion was lower. Stomatology (65.3%), aesthetic surgery of the face (15.1%) and orthognathic surgery (14.5%) were the most commented maxillofacial procedures., Discussion: The online image of French maxillofacial surgeons was very positive. However, faced with a defamatory or insulting comment, the surgeon found in an unbalanced situation where he could not respond without risking betraying medical. We recall some common-sense recommendations for managing one's e-reputation and some legislative adjustments for better regulation of these platforms, also considering legal and ethical aspects., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The invasion of Ukraine by Russian troops on February 24, 2022, and the beginning of the full-scale war had huge humanitarian consequences. The major challenges facing the Ukrainian health care system included the disruption of medical infrastructure and logistics, the termination of the supply of expendable materials, significant migration, and a dramatic increase in high-velocity blast and gunshot injuries among combatants and civilians.The aim of the present study was to analyze the challenges and solutions in patient care faced by the Ukrainian system of maxillofacial surgery during the war in different regions of the country., Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed and implemented as an online survey to collect national data concerning maxillofacial surgeons' experiences and professional activities. The study was initiated and supported by Bogomolets National Medical University (Kyiv, Ukraine), the Ukrainian representative of AO CMF (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Craniomaxillofacial Surgery) and the University of Helsinki (Finland).The questionnaire was developed by specialists in maxillofacial surgery and sociologists and contained 65 close-ended questions. Surgeons who had not worked in this specialty in inpatient departments of hospitals since at least the beginning of the full-scale war were excluded from the study. We received and analyzed 97 responses that met the abovementioned criteria. The geography of respondents covered all the regions and the main cities of Ukraine, expect for the occupied territories., Results: After a year of warfare, the percentage of surgeons who treated patients with blast and gunshot injuries increased from 43.4% to 86.6%. This percentage was higher in military hospitals and in regions located in the vicinity of the front line. We found that, during the war, 78.6% of respondents performed osteosynthesis in cases of high-velocity multifragmented facial bone fractures (in such cases, 58.3% of them strictly followed AO CMF recommendations, while 41.7% performed the fixation based on available hardware, existing technical possibilities and their own preferences). We found that 70.2% of respondents had the opportunity to apply Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture technology and patient-specific implants for the treatment of gunshot injuries, 38.1% reported that their hospitals were able to perform microsurgical reconstructions for facial defects, 79.4% of respondents reported that their departments received humanitarian aid and support from volunteer organizations (either Ukrainian or international), which significantly facilitated the treatment process., Conclusions: According to this nationwide survey of Ukrainian maxillofacial surgeons during a year of the full-scale war, 86.6% of respondents were involved in the treatment of gunshot and ballistic injuries in civilians and combatants. The main problems reported by the respondents were (1) a lack of experience and knowledge related to the treatment of severe wounds, especially by secondary reconstruction, and (2) a deficit of resources (equipment, materials, and medications) under conditions of disrupted logistics and changes in the numbers and nosological distribution of patients. There were the opportunity to transfer the patients to European clinics (29.9%), online consultations (45.4%), collaboration with foreign surgeons who come to Ukraine asvolunteers (32%)., (© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site–for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: With respect to the European Union 2017 amendment of the Medical Device Regulations (MDR), this overview article presents recommendations concerning medical 3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS)., Methods: The MDR were screened for applicability of the rules to medical in-house 3D printing. Applicable regulations were summarized and compared to the status of medical use of 3D printing in OMFS in Germany. Recommendations were made for MDR concerning medical 3D printing., Results: In-house printed models, surgical guides, and implants fall under the category of Class I-III, depending on their invasive and active properties. In-house medical 3D printing for custom-made medical devices is possible under certain prerogatives: (1) the product is not being used in another facility, (2) appropriate quality systems are applied, (3) the reason for omitting commercial products is documented, (4) information about its use is supplied to the responsible authority, (5) there is a publicly accessible declaration of origin, identification, and conformity to the MDR, (6) there are records of manufacturing site, process and performance data, (7) all products are produced according to the requirements proclaimed before, and (8) there is an evaluation of clinical use and correction of possible issues., Conclusion: Several aspects must be addressed for in house medical 3D printing, according to the MDR. Devising MDR related to medical 3D printing is a growing challenge. The implementation of recommendations in OMFS could help practitioners to overcome the challenges and become aware of the in-house production and application of 3D printed devices., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: In this comprehensive evaluation, ten experienced oral surgeon experts posed a total of twenty oral surgery-related questions, including dental implant and tooth extractions, to three distinct Natural Language Processing (NLP)-based chatbot platforms: ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing, and Google Bard. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of these chatbots in responding to specialized medical questions., Materials and Methods: Two primary evaluation metrics were employed: a Likert Scale (LS) for measuring the accuracy and completeness of responses and a Global Quality Scale (GQS) for evaluating the clarity of responses. Statistical analyses, including one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Post Hoc Tukey, were conducted to assess and compare the performance of the chatbots as rated by the experts., Results: The results of the study revealed significant differences in the performance of the chatbots. ChatGPT statistically achieved a better mean LS score of 1.4000±0.15986 than Microsoft Bing (1.8750±0.18143) and Google Bards (2.0500±0.12472) (P < 0.001). Additionally, ChatGPT statistically achieved a higher GQS score of 4.4200±0.30111 than Microsoft Bing (3.7550±0.28621) and Google Bards (3.5250±0.22392) (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: These findings showed the substantial advantage of ChatGPT in effectively addressing oral surgery-related questions with superior accuracy, completeness, and clarity. The study highlights the potential of advanced NLP platforms to enhance information retrieval and communication within the field of oral surgery, reinforcing the utility of such technologies in medical and surgical domains., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study evaluates the mandibular lingual foramina (LF) using computed tomographic imaging data from a large Central European cohort, focusing on the most relevant anatomical parameters. We aimed to examine whether there are differences in key parameters between ethnic groups, or based on age and gender. Additionally, we analyze the potential effect of tooth loss on the LF and discuss risk management options before and during surgery., Methods: 460 CT scans of adults (273 females and 186 males) were examined. The number, the location and the diameter of the median and lateral LF were assessed for each patient. The data was analyzed statistically, whereby a p-value lower than 0.05 was considered as significant., Results: Median and lateral LF were present in 95,9%, and 38,9% of patients, respectively. Male patients had a greater number of LF than females. While the majority of median LF (62%) was located above the mental spine, the majority of lateral LF was located below (84%). The diameter of lateral LF (1,15 mm ± 0,33) was smaller than for median LF (1,22 mm ± 0,35), as well the lateral canals (4,8 mm ± 1,28) were shorter than the median canals (5,32 mm ± 1,74). Lateral LF were equidistant to the symphysis (13,89 ± 3,63 mm) on either side. Critical diameter size >1 mm was found in about 2/3 of our cases. The distance from the foramen to the residual ridge was ∼7 mm less in edentulous patients compared to dentulous patients., Conclusion: The median LF is a near-obligatory structure of the mandible, while the lateral LF is a frequently encountered structure. Age does not seem to affect the frequency of LF. Edentulous patients did not show differences regarding the presence of the LF, but their vertical osseous dimension was diminished by 7 mm and they may, therefore, be at an increased risk of adverse surgical incidents. The main findings of this study relate to the substantial variability in the anatomy and location of the LF and confirm with previous studies. As the LF can be reliably detected using CT/CBCT, the use of three-dimensional-imaging is recommended prior to conducting oral surgery. Careful pre-operative planning and accurate anatomical information may help to avoid surgical complications. To ascertain the potential significance of ethnicity on LF, more data need to be collected using standardized methodologies. A definitive conclusion on the impact of ethnicity on LF thus cannot currently be drawn based on the results of our study and those available from the published medical literature., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

The epidemic of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection has presented as a critical period. Until February 23th 2020, more than 77 000 cases of 2019-nCoV infection have been confirmed in China, which has a great impact on economy and society. It has also interferred with ordinary medical practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery seriously. In order to protect oral and maxillofacial surgery medical staff from 2019-nCoV infection during the outbreak period, this paper suggests the necessary medical protective measures for oral and maxillofacial surgery outpatient and ward., (Copyright © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This review elucidates the advantages and disadvantages of the different implant navigation methods to assist the precise surgical placement of dental implants. Implant navigation surgery can be classified into: dynamic and static navigation, and static navigation can further be divided into full (FG)- and half-guided (HG) implant surgery. The HG implant placement includes the drilling-guided, pilot-drill guided, and the non-computed guided approaches. In dynamic navigation, the bone drilling and the implant placement are completely tracked with a specific software; while the static navigation refers to the use of static surgical templates. The FG associated with flapless surgery and teeth/crown supported guides has demonstrated the highest accuracy, followed by the drilling and pilot HG surgery that may provide comparable results, while the non-computer HG and FH implant placement provide the least accuracy in transmitting the implant positioning from the pre-surgical planning to the patient. Additionally, flapless implant surgery is related to reduced pain, less analgesic consumption, less swelling, shorter chair-time, and reduced risk of hemorrhage while achieving greater patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, other methods such as non-computer HG and FH implant surgery procedures require more surgical experience to overcome their limitations. There is still limited evidence to support dynamic surgery, and further investigations are needed., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

Recent innovations in wearable action cameras with high-definition video recording enable surgeons to use cameras for their surgical procedures. In this study, the GoPro HERO 6 (and 7) Black edition camera was modified step by step to allow for a completely wireless surgeon-perspective recording with a battery life and memory capacity never previously obtained with such a high level of digital video quality. With this system, a surgeon can record for more than 14 hours 26 minutes in 1,080 pixels at 60 frames per second without breaking scrub and capture the operating surgeon's direct view of the field. By modifying the newest generation of devices, the authors successfully eliminated all shortcomings of the prior generation of GoPro cameras for surgical recording. The modified GoPro HERO6 camera produced professional recording quality for a total cost lower than US$850. This is critically important, because video-based surgical training will continue to be a primary area of development in the future and represents a novel and effective way for young generations of surgeons to attain technical excellence and knowledge in surgery., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To develop assessment-of-clinical-exodontia-skills (ACES) rating scale for formative and summative assessment of undergraduate dental students performing exodontia., Place and Duration of Study: Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad, from May 2017 to February 2018., Methodology: A preliminary scale was developed using literature search and informal discussion with experts. In the first round of Delphi, this scale was emailed to oral surgery faculty across Pakistan. Their opinions were sought and the form was modified accordingly. In the second round, the modified form was emailed again to the respondents of first round and thus the form was finalized by obtaining their comments on the modified form., Results: A preliminary 27-point round-1 questionnaire was sent to 42 experts. Out of these, 30 responded (overall response rate 71.4%) and the form was modified according to their response. Frequency, percentage, and mean of Likertbased responses was calculated along with thematic analysis of individual responses. In round 2, the modified form was sent to the 30 respondents of round 1. Out of these, 21 replied (response rate 70%) and form was further modified accordingly. In round 2, primary focus was on marking/scoring strategy., Conclusion: ACES form was developed, which can be important tool in assessing exodontia skills of undergraduate dental students. This needs practical application and testing for validity.

Training in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) in the UK has undergone considerable changes during the last 10years, and "core" surgical training has replaced "basic" surgical training. In 2014 a pilot "run-through" training programme from specialist training year one (ST1)-ST7 was introduced to facilitate early entry into the speciality. Run-through training guarantees that a trainee, after a single competitive selection process and satisfactory progress, will be given training that covers the entire curriculum of the speciality, whereas uncoupled training requires a second stage of competitive recruitment after the first one (for OMFS only) or two years of "core" training to progress to higher specialty training. The first two years of run-through training (ST1-ST2) are the same as for core surgical training. Dual-qualified maxillofacial aspirants and those in their second degree course are curious to know whether they should go for the uncoupled core surgical training or the run-through programme in OMFS. The General Medical Council (GMC) has now agreed that run-through training can be rolled out nationally in OMFS. To assess the two pathways we used an online questionnaire to gain feedback about the experience from all OMFS ST3 and run-through trainees (ST3/ST4) in 2016-2017. We identified and contacted 21 trainees, and 17 responded, including seven run-through trainees. Eleven, including five of the run-through trainees, recommended the run-through training programme in OMFS. Six of the seven run-through trainees had studied dentistry first. The overall mean quality of training was rated as 5.5 on a scale 0-10 by the 17 respondents. This survey gives valuable feedback from the current higher surgical trainees in OMFS, which will be useful to the GMC, Health Education England, OMFS Specialist Advisory Committee, and those seeking to enter higher surgical training in OMFS., (Copyright © 2018 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: There are no universally accepted tools to evaluate operative skills of surgical residents in a timely fashion. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using a smartphone application, SIMPL (System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning), developed by a multi-institutional research collaborative, to achieve a high rate of timely operative evaluations and resident communication and to collect performance data. The authors hypothesized that these goals would be achieved because the process is convenient and efficient., Materials and Methods: This was a prospective feasibility and engagement study using SIMPL to evaluate residents' operative skills. SIMPL requires the attending surgeon to answer 3 multiple-choice questions: 1) What level of help (Zwisch Scale) was required by the trainee? 2) What was the level of performance? 3) How complex was the case? The evaluator also can dictate a narrative. The sample was composed of 3 faculty members and 3 volunteer senior residents. Predictor variables were the surgeons, trainees, and procedures performed. Outcome variables included number and percentage of procedures performed by faculty-and-resident pairs assessed, time required to complete assessments, time lapsed to submission, percentage of assessments with narratives, and residents' response rates., Results: From March through June 2016, 151 procedures were performed in the operating room by the faculty-and-resident teams. There were 107 assessments submitted (71%). Resident response (self-assessment) to faculty evaluations was 81%. Recorded time to complete assessments (n = 75 of 107) was shorter than 2 minutes. The time lapsed to submission was shorter than 72 hours (100%). Dictations were submitted for 35 evaluations (33%). Data for the type of help, performance, and complexity of cases were collected for each resident., Conclusions: SIMPL facilitates timely intraoperative evaluations of surgical skills, engagement by faculty and residents, and collection of detailed procedural data. Additional prospective trials to assess this tool further are planned., (Copyright © 2017 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

China is currently in the process of establishing formal residency training programs in oral and maxillofacial surgery and other medical and dental specialties. Regulatory agencies, and educational and academic institutions in China are exploring mechanisms, goals and standards of residency training that meet the needs of the Chinese healthcare system. This article provides an introduction of residency training in oral and maxillofacial surgery in the United States, with emphasis on the accreditation standard by the Commission on Dental Accreditation. As there are fundamental differences in the medical and dental education systems between China and United States, the training standards in the United States may not be entirely applicable in China. A competency-based training model that focus on overall competencies in medical knowledge, clinical skills and values at the time of graduation should be taken into consideration in a Chinese residency training program in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Dental procedures are often performed on patients who present with some level of medical fragility. In many dental schools, the exercise of taking a medical history is all too often a transcription of information to the dental chart, with little emphasis on the presurgical risk assessment and the development of a treatment plan appropriate to the medical status of the dental patient. Changes in dentistry, driven by an increasingly medically complex population of dental patients, combined with treatment advances rooted in the biomedical sciences necessitate the adaptation of our dental education to include a stronger background in systemic health. Many predoctoral educators in the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) have expressed concern about the medical preparedness of our dental students; therefore, the AAOMS and its Committee on Predoctoral Education and Training have provided recommendations for improving the medical curriculum in predoctoral dental education, including a strengthening of training in clinical medicine and biomedical sciences, with specific recommendations for improved training of our dental students and dental faculty., (Copyright © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Clinical pathways have become an important and simple method of improving patient outcomes and decreasing health care resource usage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early outcomes associated with the implementation of a clinical pathway in a maxillofacial head and neck surgery unit., Materials and Methods: This investigation is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. Continuous variables were compared among 4 groups using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using χ 2 test or Fisher exact test where appropriate. The primary predictor variable was use of the clinical pathway. Groups included patients treated by surgeon A during periods before and after implementation of a postoperative clinical pathway. Two groups treated by surgeon B also were evaluated during the same periods and served as external controls. Each period covered a span of 6 months. Outcome variables across groups were evaluated, including length-of-stay metrics, infection rates, transfers to the intensive care unit, and unplanned return to the operating room., Results: Sixty-six patients who underwent microvascular head and neck reconstruction were included. There was a significant decrease in the average length of stay (P = .0364) and an increase in the rate of discharge within 7 days (P = .0416) in the group treated with the clinical pathway. Other outcomes, including infection rate, transfer to the intensive care unit, and unanticipated return to the operating room, showed no relevant difference among groups., Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that implementation of a clinical pathway can be beneficial for efficient management of postoperative care in the setting of microvascular head and neck reconstruction. More predictable and shorter lengths of stay are achievable and the clinical pathway serves as a valuable means of improving communication of the clinical care team., (Copyright © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This essay puts forth the proposition that academic program excellence does not arise by accident. Effective leadership is required. To support this proposition, the essay discusses the characteristics common to effective leaders. It then proceeds to use the example of a successful academic oral-maxillofacial surgery department and characteristics of its leader to provide evidence that excellence derives from effective leadership., (Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The French Society of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (SFSCMFCO) together with the Medical Society of Dento-Maxillofacial Orthopedics has drawn up in 2015 a new practice guideline concerning the management of one or several impacted cuspids. As the previous ones, this guideline is based on a rigorous French Heath Regulation Authorities type methodology. It is thus intended to become a major reference in its field. We report hereafter the short version of the text in the same way it has been presented during the 2015 French National Congress of the SFSCMFCO in Lyon - France. Each of these recommendations is marked A, B or C according to a decreasing evidence based rating scale. Lacking any evidence-based data, the recommendation is considered as an expert opinion (AE). The full text of this guideline is available on the website of the SFSCMFCO at the following address: http://www.sfscmfco.fr/; "Recommandations de bonnes pratiques" section. A patient information sheet is also proposed by the working group. Happy reading., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Criteria of quality of care in oral and maxillofacial surgery should reflect not only the quality of the repair functions of chewing, swallowing, breathing, speech, and should take into account the psycho-emotional condition of the patient; satisfaction of its appearance, quality cosmetic fill configuration of the face, tooth defects, smiles; adaptation to implants and dentures; their quality, the conditions and possibilities of their use. The application of the provisions of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in oral and maxillofacial surgery, is a condition that will allow to unify the approaches to the development of quality criteria of this type of medical care.

Aims and Objectives: To audit the content of dental practice websites offering dental implant services against a framework based on the GDC 2012 Guidelines for Ethical Advertising and other relevant advertising standards., Methods: An audit framework was constructed and applied to the top fifty websites resulting from a Google UK search using the search term 'dental implant specialist'., Results: Compliance with many elements of the GDC Guidance remains poor. Sixty-eight percent of websites claimed that the practitioner providing the service was a GDC registered specialist, though examples were found where this claim was unfounded. Fourteen percent of practice websites claimed that the service was being carried out by an 'implant specialist' and 16% claimed the practitioner was an 'implantologist'; the majority of sites using these terms (10%) involved practitioners that had no specialist status. The display of potentially misleading memberships and fellowships of a range of dental associations, academies, societies and foundations remains common (52%), as does the adoption of the title 'Dr' (60%)., Conclusion: Comparison with earlier studies indicates that compliance with recent GDC standards is generally improving, though whether the pace of improvement is seen as acceptable or not is something that policymakers and regulatory authorities may need to consider further.

Background: The United Kingdom and its national healthcare system represent a unique comparison for many other developed countries (such as Australia and France), as the practice of prophylactic removal of third molars in the United Kingdom has been discouraged for nearly two decades, with clear guidelines issued by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in 2000 to limit third molar removal to only pathological situations. No such guidelines exist in Australia or France. The healthcare systems in England, France and Australia all use the International Classification of Disease (ICD) coding system for diagnostic categorising of all admissions to hospitals., Aim: This study rested upon the opportunity of a universal coding system and semi-open access data to complete the first comparative study on an international scale of hospitalisations for removal of impacted teeth (between 99/00 and 08/09)., Results: Our international comparison revealed significant differences in rates of admission, with England having rates approximately five times less than France, and seven times less than Australia. Those results could be explained by the implementation of guidelines in the United Kingdom, and the absence of similar guidelines in France and Australia.

Background: The study was undertaken in an academic maxillofacial and oral surgical unit in a large quaternary hospital attached to the Medical School of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, between 2002 and 2006., Objective: To investigate the number of days in seven patient management intervals from facial fracture occurrence to discharge from hospital, to gain insight into reasons for treatment delays., Results: Facial fractures were treated a mean of 20.4 days from occurrence. There was a mean of 10.3 days from fracture to hospital presentation, and an identical period from hospital presentation to treatment. Statistical analysis showed that delay times decreased from 2002 to 2006., Conclusion: More rapid referral to the maxillofacial and oral surgical unit is the most practical way to reduce delays further.

Patients' perspective is increasingly re-cognised as an important outcome measure in oral surgery. However, how patients perceive the surgical treatment cannot be assessed currently. This would be an important indicator for process-related quality of care. It was the aim to develop and to validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-based measures of process-related quality of care in oral surgery. The new Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q) was developed in two steps in patients undergoing oral surgery. First, an item pool was created using semi-structured interviews in 90 patients. Second, a preliminary version was applied in 297 consecutively recruited patients to assess redundancy, completion rates, face validity, difficulty and distribution. Psychometric properties of the final version of the questionnaire were evaluated. The BiOS-Q consists of 16 items and showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0·84) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0·90). The questionnaire's mean score was significantly correlated with dentists' burdens (r = 0·44) and patients' overall satisfaction (r = 0·39) indicating sufficient validity. The BiOS-Q is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patient-based process-related quality of care in oral surgery., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Dental foundation training (DFT) is a two-year programme being introduced for new dental graduates. It is not currently compulsory but there are plans to make it so. Those studying oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) must complete both medical and dental degrees, and training, and if DFT becomes a requirement for dental registration, the process could be lengthened. We aimed to examine the overlap between DFT and medical foundation and core surgical training, to highlight areas of potential duplication for those who completed their surgical training before graduating from dental school. Relevant curricula for OMFS trainees were identified and compared with the DFT curriculum, and a qualitative assessment tool was developed to measure overlap between non-analogous curricula. Depending on previous experience, an OMFS trainee who completed core training in surgery before studying dentistry may already have covered 76% of the DFT curriculum. Areas with the least duplication in clinical skills (53%) were notably those related to restorative dentistry, prosthodontics, and periodontology, but there was considerable overlap in non-clinical areas such as communication skills (100%) and professionalism (90%). A method of standardised assessment of previous experience may allow for DFT to be shortened for OMFS trainees., (Copyright © 2011 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

It is a worldwide trend that oral surgeons do not stop patients' anticoagulant therapy, but they leave the INR in the therapeutic range (INR: 2.0-3.0). The reason is that stopping drugs carries a higher risk of embolism, and thrombosis. The purpose of the present study is to reproduce these international guidelines in a Hungarian setting. On the day of surgery a lab test is performed immediately before the operation. These tests include coagulation data. A control (INR < 1.89) and an experimental group (INR: 2.0-3.0) were formed. Clinical complications, especially bleeding and thromboembolic complications were monitored. Based on the data and types of surgery no significant differences were found between the two groups. In conclusion it can be stated that it would be advisable to implement international guidelines and recommendations because there is a higher risk for anticoagulated patients if their therapy is stopped as if their INR is left in the therapeutic range. Of course appropriate wound care and bleeding control are necessary.

Background: Traditionally, a 1-cm surgical resection margin is used for early oral tongue tumours., Methods: All tumour stage one (n = 65) and stage two (n = 13) oral tongue cancers treated between January 1999 and January 2009 were followed for a median of 38 months (minimum 12 months). The sites of close and involved margins were histologically reviewed., Results: Involved and close margins occurred in 14 and 55 per cent of cases, respectively. The number of involved vs clear or close margins was equivalent in tumour stage one (90 vs 82 per cent), node-negative (100 vs 84 per cent) and perineural or lymphovascular invasion (20 vs 21 per cent) cases. Close or involved margins were similarly likely to be posterior (59 per cent) as anterior (41 per cent, p = 0.22), lateral (57 per cent) as medial (43 per cent, p = 0.34), and mucosal (59 per cent) as deep (41 per cent, p = 0.22). Local recurrence occurred in 28 per cent of cases at a median of 12 months, and was more likely in cases with involved (50 per cent) than clear or close margins (25 per cent, p = 0.10). Disease-free survival was worse in involved margins cases (p = 0.002)., Conclusion: Involved margins are common in early tongue tumours, and are associated with increased local recurrence and worse survival. Close or involved margins occur in all directions and all tumour types. A wider margin may be justified.