Search

Background: Difficult airway management remains a critical procedure with life-threatening adverse events. Current guidelines suggest high-flow therapy by nasal cannulae (HFNC) as a preoxygenation device in this setting. However, there is an evidence gap to support this recommendation., Methods: The PREOPTI-DAM study is an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled phase 3 trial done at Nantes University Hospital, France. Patients were aged 18-90 years with one major or two minor criteria of anticipated difficult airway management, and requiring intubation for scheduled surgery, were eligible. Patients with body mass index >35 kg/m 2 were excluded. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive 4-min preoxygenation by HFNC or facemask. Randomisation was stratified according to the intubation strategy (laryngoscopic versus fiberoptic intubation). The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen desaturation ≤94% or of bag-mask ventilation during intubation. The primary and safety analyses included the intention to treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03604120) and EudraCT (2018-A00434-51)., Findings: From September 4 2018 to March 31 2021, 186 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. One participant withdrew consent and 185 (99.5%) were included in the primary analysis (HFNC, N = 95; Facemask, N = 90). The incidence of the primary outcome was not significantly different between the HFNC and the facemask groups, respectively 2 (2%) versus 7 (8%); adjusted difference, -5.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), -11.8 to 0.6], P = 0.10. In the HFNC group, 76 patients (80%) versus 53 (59%) in the facemask group, reported good or excellent intubation experiences; adjusted difference 20.5 [95% CI, 8.3-32.8], P = 0.016. Comparing HFNC with facemask, severe complication occurred in 22 (23%) versus 27 (30%) patients (P = 0.29), and moderate complication in 14 (15%) versus 18 (20%) patients (P = 0.35). No death or cardiac arrest occurred during the study., Interpretation: Compared with facemask, HFNC did not significantly reduce the incidence of desaturation ≤94% or bag-mask ventilation during anticipated difficult intubation but the trial was underpowered to rule out a clinically significant benefit. Patient satisfaction was improved with HFNC., Funding: Nantes University Hospital and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare., Competing Interests: MV declares personal fees from MSD, Pfizer, Baxter, Grants from Fisher Paykel, outside the submitted work. KA reprorts grants from Fischer & Paykel and Biomerieux, and consulting fees from Baxter, LFB, and Edward Lifesciences. AR reports receiving consulting fees from MSD and bioMerieux. BR reports receiving lecture fees from NordicPharma, Aguettant, and LFB and support for attending meetings NordicPharma. Other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest involving the work under consideration for publication. No compensation was received for this study., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Introduction: Although preoxygenation and airway management respond to precise algorithms, difficult intubation (DI) remains a daily challenge in intensive care units and in the operating rooms because of its frequent complications, including hypoxaemia. To prevent desaturation during DI, high-flow oxygenation by nasal cannula (HFNC) could prove beneficial. Indeed, contrary to standard preoxygenation device, it can be held in place throughout the intubation trying to perform apnoeic oxygenation during DI. Hence, recent guidelines recommend HFNC during DI, but its relevance has never been evaluated in this setting in a large randomised study until now., Methods and Analysis: The PREOPTIDAM trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, controlled study in Nantes University Hospital. In anticipated DI, we hypothesised that HFNC can decrease the incidence of desaturation ≤94% or face mask ventilation from 16% to 4% compared with standard device. Using a two-sided t-test with a first species risk of 5% and 80% power, a total of 186 patients will be included. Using a computer-generated randomisation, with a 1:1 allocation ratio, patients will be randomised to HFNC or face mask preoxygenation. Randomisation will be stratified on intubation sequence: Rapid sequence intubation or awake fibreoptic intubation. The primary objective is to determine whether HFNC is more efficient than standard oxygenation techniques to prevent desaturation ≤94% or face mask ventilation during DI. Intent-to-treat and per-protocol analysis are planned for the primary outcome., Ethics and Dissemination: The study project has been approved by an independent ethics committee. Written informed consent will be obtained before study inclusion. Participant recruitment begins in September 2018. Results will be submitted to international peer-reviewed medical journals., Trial Registration Number: NCT03604120., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MV reports personal fees from MSD, Pfizer, Baxter, grants from Fischer Paykel, outside the submitted work. SJ reports personal fees from Draeger, Fresenius-Xenios and Fisher Paykel Healthcare, outside the submitted work. KA declares personal fees from Fisher Paykel Healthcare, Baxter, LFB, Fresenius. The other authors declared to have no conflict of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Because of the lack of controlled studies, there is no consensus regarding the practice of routine haemostasis tests before neuraxial blockade in children. The purpose of this study was to describe the French surgical practice about the preoperative evaluation of coagulation in children who were scheduled for paediatric neuraxial anaesthesia., Study Design: Descriptive analysis of the practice., Methods: A telephone survey for coagulation screening was conducted in French surgical paediatric units, known to perform paediatric neuraxial anaesthesia on a routine basis. The aim of the standardized questionnaire was to evaluate the expertise in performance of neuraxial block, the modalities of the preoperative haemostasis screening, and the indications of biological tests and to assess whether a standardized team procedure was used., Results: Forty-two hospitals (27 universities, 10 general hospitals and five private institutions) were contacted; 61 anaesthesiologists with an expertise with central block answered the survey. Thirty-five institutions used a standardized procedure and 57,1% of them undertook routines tests only in children who are not walking. In the remaining 42,9%, the strategy was to screen systematically all patients whatever their age, familial and personal history as well as physical examination. However, only 54% of the anaesthesiologists performed an extensive physical examination in order to detect symptoms in favour of signs of haemostatic disorders., Conclusion: While numerous data suggest that routine testing does not to provide much extra information in the absence of a positive history, a systematic strategy is still widely applied in children. Guidelines need to be developed to insure the safety of oriented tests.

Background: The objective of this prospective study was the evaluation of the analgesia provided by an epidural infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl after different types of surgery in children., Methods: Data were collected from 348 epidural analgesia in 87 children below 2 years of age, in 80 children between 2 and 6 years and 181 above 6 years of age, for a median duration of 43 postoperative hours. Bupivacaine (mean concentration 0.185%) and fentanyl (5 microg.kg-1.day-1) were administered on the surgical ward., Results: Pain control was considered excellent in 86% of the 11 072 pain hourly assessments. Analgesia was found to be better for children older than 2 years, and the overall quality of their night's sleep was better than that of older children. Higher pain scores were noted for Nissen fundoplication surgery and club foot repairs. Early discontinuation rarely occurred, and only because of technical problems with the epidural catheter (4%) or insufficient analgesia (6%). Complications were minor (nausea/vomiting 14%, pruritus 0.6%, urinary retention 17%) and easily reversed., Conclusions: This combination of bupivacaine-fentanyl provides safe analgesia after major surgery in children with frequent clinical monitoring. Regular pain assessments of intensity and duration are useful to improve the quality of postoperative analgesia.

The authors report a toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) due to ampicillin (Agram) in a 2-year-old child. During the acute phase a septic syndrome occurred. The severity of the clinical and biological symptoms led to the administration of antibiotics, their systematic use remaining controversial. Recovery was favourable in a paediatric burn centre. Sequelae were minor. TEN, the physiopathological mechanism of which remaining still unknown, may carry a vital risk.

Postoperative pain after spinal surgeries is highly dependent on the number of vertebrae included in the operation and on its invasiveness, opposing two extremes, discectomies and cyphoscoliosis corrections. Opiates by intravenous route remain the reference, either continuously given in predetermined doses, or better using a patient-controlled device. Nonsteroidal and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely popular for medical approach of sciatalgia and it is quite logical to use them for reducing, even to suppress, opiates after spinal surgeries. Supported by many studies, spinal administration of analgesics (opiates, alpha 2-agonists, corticosteroids) may be of interest in pain treatment of spinal surgeries. In order to prolong locoregional analgesia, a catheter may be inserted into epidural space by caudal route or surgically, before skin closure. Morphine is the most popular agent in this indication. Also, epidural clonidine results in excellent pain relief, but is associated with hypotension and marked sedation. In discectomy, injection of dexamethasone into the operative field has been proposed. Whatever the technique used, early diagnosis of neurological complications of spinal surgery should be not ruled out by postoperative analgesia.