Search

Purpose: Suramin is a multifunctional molecule with a wide range of potential applications, including parasitic and viral diseases, as well as cancer., Methods: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled single ascending dose study was conducted to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of suramin in healthy Chinese volunteers. A total of 36 healthy subjects were enrolled. All doses of suramin sodium and placebo were administered as a 30-minute infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected at the designated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. Safety was assessed by clinical examinations and adverse events., Results: After a single dose, suramin maximum plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC last ) increased in a dose-proportional manner. The plasma half-life (t 1/2 ) was dose-independent, average 48 days (range 28-105 days). The cumulative percentages of the dose excreted in urine over 7 days were less than 4%. Suramin can be detected in urine samples for longer periods (more than 140 days following infusion). Suramin was generally well tolerated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally mild in severity., Conclusion: The PK and safety profiles of suramin in Chinese subjects indicated that 10 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg could be an appropriate dose in a future multiple-dose study., Competing Interests: Lie Gu and Nanfang Hong are employed by Hainan Honz Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. who funded the study. Jianzhong Shentu, as the principal investigator, received funding from Hainan Honz Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© 2023 Wu et al.)

Suramin (Sur) acts as an ecto -NTPDase inhibitor in Trypanosoma cruzi and a P2-purinoceptor antagonist in mammalian cells. Although the potent antitrypanosomal effect of Sur has been shown in vitro , limited evidence in vivo suggests that this drug can be dangerous to T. cruzi -infected hosts. Therefore, we investigated the dose-dependent effect of Sur-based chemotherapy in a murine model of Chagas disease. Seventy uninfected and T. cruzi -infected male C57BL/6 mice were randomized into five groups: SAL = uninfected; INF = infected; SR5, SR10, and SR20 = infected treated with 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg Sur. In addition to its effect on blood and heart parasitism, the impact of Sur-based chemotherapy on leucocytes myocardial infiltration, cytokine levels, antioxidant defenses, reactive tissue damage, and mortality was analyzed. Our results indicated that animals treated with 10 and 20 mg/kg Sur were disproportionally susceptible to T. cruzi , exhibiting increased parasitemia and cardiac parasitism (amastigote nests and parasite load ( T. cruzi DNA)), intense protein, lipid and DNA oxidation, marked myocarditis, and mortality. Animals treated with Sur also exhibited reduced levels of nonprotein antioxidants. However, the upregulation of catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione-S-transferase was insufficient to counteract reactive tissue damage and pathological myocardial remodeling. It is still poorly understood whether Sur exerts a negative impact on the purinergic signaling of T. cruzi -infected host cells. However, our findings clearly demonstrated that through enhanced parasitism, inflammation, and reactive tissue damage, Sur-based chemotherapy contributes to aggravating myocarditis and increasing mortality rates in T. cruzi -infected mice, contradicting the supposed relevance attributed to this drug for the treatment of Chagas disease.

Suramin is a trypan blue analogon originally developed to treat protozoan infections, which was found to have diverse antitumor effects. One of the most severe side effects in clinical trials was the development of a peripheral sensory-motor polyneuropathy. In this study, we aimed to investigate suramin-induced neuropathy with a focus on calcium (Ca 2+ ) homeostasis as a potential pathomechanism. Adult C57Bl/6 mice treated with a single injection of 250 mg/kg bodyweight suramin developed locomotor and sensory deficits, which were confirmed by electrophysiological measurements showing a predominantly sensory axonal-demyelinating polyneuropathy. In a next step, we used cultured dorsal root ganglia neurons (DRGN) as an in vitro cell model to further investigate underlying pathomechanisms. Cell viability of DRGN was significantly decreased after 24-hour suramin treatment with a calculated IC 50 of 283 µM. We detected a suramin-induced Ca 2+ influx into DRGN from the extracellular space, which could be reduced with the voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) inhibitor nimodipine. Co-incubation of suramin and nimodipine partially improved cell viability of DRGN after suramin exposure. In summary, we describe suramin-induced neurotoxic effects on DRGN as well as potentially neuroprotective agents targeting intracellular Ca 2+ dyshomeostasis., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Although suramin (Sur) is suggested as a potential drug candidate in the management of Chagas disease, this issue has not been objectively tested. In this study, we examined the applicability of concomitant treatment with benznidazole (Bz) and suramin in mice infected with a virulent strain of Trypanosoma cruzi. Eighty 12-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were equally randomized in eight groups: (i) noninfected mice (negative control) and mice infected with T. cruzi Y strain receiving (ii) no treatment (positive control), (iii) Bz, 100 mg/kg of body weight per day, (iv) Sur, 20 mg/kg/day, and (v to viii) Sur, 20 mg/kg/day, combined with Bz, 100, 50, 25, or 5 mg/kg/day. Bz was administered by gavage, and Sur was administered intraperitoneally. Sur dramatically increased the parasitemia, cardiac content of parasite DNA, inflammation, oxidative tissue damage, and mortality. In response to high parasitic load in cardiac tissue, Sur stimulated the immune system in a manner typical of the acute phase of Chagas disease, increasing tissue levels of gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and inducing a preferential IgG2a anti-T. cruzi serum pattern. When Sur and Bz were combined, the infection severity was attenuated, showing a dose-dependent Bz response. Sur therapy had a more harmful effect on the host than on the parasite and reduced the efficacy of Bz against T. cruzi infection. Considering that Sur drastically reinforced the infection evolution, potentiating the inflammatory process and the severity of cardiac lesions, the in vivo findings contradicted the in vitro anti-T. cruzi potential described for this drug., (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Purpose: Suramin, a polysulfonated naphthylurea, inhibits the actions of polypeptide growth factors including acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors (aFGF and bFGF), which confer broad spectrum chemotherapy resistance. We hypothesized that suramin at non-cytotoxic doses in combination with weekly paclitaxel would be well tolerated and demonstrate anti-tumor activity., Methods: Women with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with a taxane in the adjuvant or metastatic setting were eligible. The primary objective of the phase I was to determine the dose of intravenous (IV) weekly suramin that resulted in plasma concentrations between 10 and 50 umol/l over 8-48 h (or the target range) in combination with IV 80 mg/m(2) of weekly paclitaxel. The primary objective of the phase II trial was to determine the anti-tumor activity of the dosing regimen defined in phase I. Therapy was continued until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity., Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled (9: phase I; 22: phase II). In phase I, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Pharmacokinetics during the first cycle showed suramin concentrations within the target range for 21 of 24 weekly treatments (88 %). In phase II, the objective response rate (ORR) was 23 % (95 % CI 8-45 %), the median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95 % CI 2.1-4.9 months), and the median overall survival was 11.2 months (95 % CI 6.6-16.0 months)., Conclusions: Non-cytotoxic doses of suramin in combination with weekly paclitaxel were well tolerated. The efficacy was below the pre-specified criteria required to justify further investigation.

Purpose: In preclinical models, non-cytotoxic suramin (concentrations <50 μM) potentiates the activity of multiple chemotherapeutic agents. The present study evaluated the safety and tolerability of suramin in combination with docetaxel or gemcitabine in previously chemotherapy-treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer., Methods: Patients received suramin intravenously in combination with either docetaxel on day 1 or gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, of each 21-day treatment cycle. After 3 cycles, patients with partial response (PR) or better continued on the same combination, whereas patients with stable disease (SD) or worse crossed-over to the other combination. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed before and after each treatment., Results: Eighteen patients received a total of 79 courses (37 suramin plus docetaxel, 42 suramin plus gemcitabine). The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was febrile neutropenia, observed in three of six patients treated with suramin and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). No DLTs were observed with suramin plus docetaxel 56 mg/m(2) or suramin plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2). Common adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, skin rash, hyperglycemia, and electrolyte abnormalities. The target plasma suramin concentration range of 10-50 μM was achieved in 90% of treatments. Discernable antitumor activity was noted in 11 patients (2 PR, 9 SD)., Conclusions: Non-cytotoxic suramin, in combination with docetaxel 56 mg/m(2) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2), was reasonably well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile. Target plasma concentrations were correctly predicted by our previously described dosing nomogram. The observed preliminary evidence of antitumor activity encourages evaluation of this strategy in efficacy trials.

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of noncytotoxic doses of suramin to reverse chemotherapy resistance in advanced chemonaive and chemoresistant non-small-cell lung cancer patients., Patients and Methods: Patients received paclitaxel (Taxol) (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve 6 mg/ml/min) every 3 weeks. The total suramin per cycle dose was calculated using a nomogram derived from the preceding phase I trial to obtain the desirable plasma concentration range of 10-50 microM., Results: Thirty-nine response-assessable chemonaive patients (arm A) received 213 cycles. Thirty-eight cycles were administered to 15 patients with demonstrated resistance to paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm B). The pattern/frequency of toxic effects was similar to those expected for paclitaxel/carboplatin, and pharmacokinetic analyses (199 cycles) showed suramin plasma concentrations maintained between 10 and 50 microM in 94% of cycles. In arm A, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval 22% to 54%; two complete, 12 partial); 15 patients (38%) had disease stabilization for > or =4 months; median progression-free survival (intention to treat) was 6.4 months; median overall survival (OS) 10.4 months and 1-year survival rate 38%. In arm B, no RECIST responses occurred; four patients had disease stabilization for > or =4 months; median OS was 132 days and 1-year survival rate 7%. Plasma basic fibroblast growth factor levels were higher in chemopretreated/refractory patients compared with chemonaive patients (P = 0.05). Sequence analysis of the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain in a long-term disease-free survivor revealed an ATP-binding pocket mutation (T790M)., Conclusions: Noncytotoxic suramin did not increase paclitaxel/carboplatin's toxicity and the suramin dose was predicted from clinical parameters. No clinically significant reversal of primary resistance was documented, but a modulatory effect in chemotherapy-naive patients cannot be excluded. Controlled randomization is planned for further evaluation of this treatment strategy.

Background: Low and nontoxic concentrations (10-50 microM) of suramin, which is a nonspecific inhibitor of multiple growth factors, including fibroblast growth factors, enhances the activities of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, such as doxorubicin and paclitaxel, both in vitro and in vivo. Suramin has not been evaluated as a chemosensitizing agent in dogs with cancer., Hypothesis: Nontoxic suramin can be used safely as a chemosensitizer in dogs., Animals: Sixteen dogs of various breeds with measurable tumors were treated; 1 dog that had undergone amputation for osteosarcoma received adjuvant therapy., Methods: The dogs received 53 courses of treatment with suramin in combination with doxorubicin. The suramin dosage was 6.75 mg/kg IV 3 h before standard doxorubicin administration every 2 weeks. The pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy were determined., Results: The pharmacokinetics of low-dose suramin followed a 2-compartment model with half-lives of 2 h and 6 days. The distribution volume was a 0.34 +/- 0.12 L/kg, and clearance was 1.86 +/- 0.76 mL/kg/h. During the time interval that doxorubicin was present at therapeutically active concentrations (ie, from the start of infusion to 24 hours), the plasma concentrations were maintained within 20% of the target range (8-60 microM) in 72% of the treatments. The toxicity of the suramin/doxorubicin combination was mild and comparable to the toxicity expected for doxorubicin monotherapy. Objective partial responses were observed in 2 out of 16 evaluable dogs (13%). All 5 dogs that previously received doxorubicin showed improved responses to the suramin/doxorubicin combination., Conclusions and Clinical Importance: A fixed, low-dose suramin regimen yields the desired target plasma concentrations in most dogs, and appears to enhance the activity of doxorubicin without enhancing toxicity.

Background: The term exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC) has been coined for a group of congenital malformations that includes epispadias, bladder exstrophy and cloacal exstrophy. It is usually thought that these malformations develop against a similar embryological background. This background, however, is still obscure. This is mainly due to the lack of availability of abnormal human or non-human embryos showing the crucial developmental steps in the morphogenesis of EEC malformations. In this paper, we present chick embryos that show cloacal exstrophy at early developmental stages. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documentation of this rare malformation in young embryos., Materials and Methods: Embryos with cloacal exstrophy (n=4) were found among embryos from two experimental series (n=50) that were primarily performed to document the early morphogenesis of facial and cardiovascular malformations. The malformations were induced by the administration of suramin according to established protocols. Suramin can induce a spectrum of malformations including facial clefts, heart defects, and cloacal exstrophy., Results and Conclusions: Besides the presence of an abnormal opening into the cloaca, all embryos were characterised by an abnormal broadening of the caudal trunk at the level of the leg buds, which, in the youngest embryos, was associated with the abnormal presence of large aneurysmatic swellings of the dorsal aortae at this side. We postulate that these aneurysmatic swellings might be the primary defects leading to the development of EEC malformations. These space-occupying anomalies seem to cause abnormal distensions of the developing pelvis and of the infra-umbilical portion of the developing body wall. In consequence, the mid-portion of the developing ventral body wall between the origin of the umbilical cord and the cloacal plate becomes stretched and thinned out. Tension and thinning of the ventral body wall might ultimately lead to its rupture with exposure of the lumen of the embryonic cloaca and allantois. This new concept on the morphogenesis of the EEC is the first not to be inferred from the conditions seen in fetal or postnatal human cases but is based entirely on data from malformed embryos.

Background: Research has suggested that men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma have a lower quality of life (QOL) compared with men who have hormone-sensitive prostate carcinoma and that quality of life (QOL) steadily declines over the last year of life for men with prostate carcinoma. The primary purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether there was evidence of palliative effects associated with suramin at any of the three doses administered in the original clinical trial., Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed advanced hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate were randomized to receive suramin at a low dose (n = 129; median age, 69 years), an intermediate dose (n = 129; median age, 71 years), or a high dose (n = 127; median age, 70 years) as part of the Intergroup 0159/Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9480 trial. Patients completed a battery of assessment tools, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Prostate, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), the Brief Pain Inventory, and an opioid medication log, at baseline, on Day 1 of the sixth week of active therapy, during the second week after treatment termination, and 3 months after administration of the final suramin dose., Results: Patients who received low-dose suramin reported improvement in QOL (FACT-General: P < 0.01; FACT-Treatment Outcome Index: P < 0.01) and decreased levels of depression (CES-D: P < 0.0006) during treatment compared with patients in the intermediate- and high-dose arms. After treatment, all groups experienced equal decreases in FACT and CES-D scores., Conclusions: The pattern of results suggests that the lowest dose of suramin administered had a palliative effect in terms of improvement in QOL and decreased levels of depression and that this effect was lost once suramin was discontinued., ((c) 2004 American Cancer Society)

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is a major clinical problem because it represents the dose-limiting side effects of a significant number of antineoplastic drugs. The incidence of CIPN varies depending on the drugs and schedules used, and this can be quite high, particularly when neurophysiological methods are used to make a diagnosis. However, even when CIPN is not a dose-limiting side effect, its onset may severely affect the quality of life of cancer patients and cause chronic discomfort. In this review the features of CIPN due to the administration of the most widely used drugs, such as platinum drugs, taxanes and vinca alkaloids, and of two old drugs with new clinical applications, suramin and thalidomide, will be discussed. Moreover, the earliest data regarding the neurotoxicity of some new classes of very promising antineoplastic agents, such as epothilones and proteasome inhibitors, will be discussed. Finally, the data available on neuroprotectants, evaluated in the attempt to prevent CIPN, will be summarised.

To elucidate the underlying mechanisms involved in AIDS therapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, we have developed a model of nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor-induced painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat, using 2',3'-dideoxycytidine (ddC), 2',3'-dideoxyinosine (ddI) and 2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine (d4T), AIDS chemotherapeutic drugs that are also components of AIDS highly active anti-retroviral therapy. Administration of ddC, ddI and d4T produced dose-dependent mechanical hypersensitivity and allodynia. Peripheral administration of inhibitors of protein kinase A, protein kinase C, protein kinase G, p42/p44-mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2) and nitric oxide synthase, which have demonstrated anti-hyperalgesic effects in other models of metabolic and toxic painful peripheral neuropathies, had no effect on ddC-, ddI- and d4T-induced hypersensitivity. Since suramin, an anti-parasitic and anti-cancer drug, which shares with the anti-retroviral nucleoside analogs, mitochondrial toxicity, altered regulation of intracellular calcium, and a sensory neuropathy in humans, also produced mechanical hypersensitivity that was not sensitive to the above second messenger inhibitors we evaluated the role of intracellular calcium. Intradermal or spinal injection of intracellular calcium modulators (TMB-8 and Quin-2), which had no effect on nociception in control rats, significantly attenuated and together eliminated ddC and suramin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity. In electrophysiology experiments in ddC-treated rats, C-fibers demonstrated alterations in pattern of firing as indicated by changes in the distribution of interspike intervals to sustained suprathreshold stimuli without change in mechanical activation thresholds or in number of action potentials in response to threshold and suprathreshold stimulation. This study provides evidence for a novel, calcium-dependent, mechanism for neuropathic pain in a model of AIDS therapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy.

Suramin is a polysulfonated naphthylurea that inhibits the function of growth factors and growth factor receptors implicated in glioma progression, angiogenesis, and radioresistance. The safety and benefits of combining inhibitors of angiogenesis and growth factors with cytotoxic therapies in patients with neoplasms of the central nervous system remain unclear. The objectives of this phase 2 study were to determine the safety of administering suramin with standard cranial radiotherapy (RT) and to estimate survival using this approach in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Fifty-five patients with newly diagnosed GBM (Karnofsky performance status >or= 60) were enrolled in this multicenter phase 2 study. Patients received suramin by a conventional intermittent fixed-dosing regimen for 1 week prior to and during cranial RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions, weeks 2-7). Patients with stable or responsive disease at week 18 received an additional 4 weeks of suramin (weeks 19-22). The median survival for suramin-treated patients was 11.6 months, with 1-year and 18-month survival rates of 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-62%) and 18% (95% CI, 8%-28%), respectively. Overall, 55% of the patients (30/55) had greater than grade 2 toxicity at least possibly related to suramin therapy. Two patients died of possibly related neurologic events (i.e., stroke, elevated intracranial pressure). Otherwise, toxicities were generally transient and self-limited. Administration of suramin using an intermittent fixed-dosing regimen during cranial RT was generally well tolerated. However, overall survival is not significantly improved when compared with the New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy GBM database or other comparable patient populations.

Purpose: Suramin is a polysulfonated naphthylurea that inhibits proliferation and DNA synthesis of transitional cell carcinoma cell lines. Its large molecular size and negative charge inhibit bladder absorption, making suramin an excellent candidate for intravesical chemotherapy. Intravesical suramin was evaluated in a phase I study to define dose limiting toxicity and systemic absorption, determine a starting dose and regimen for phase II studies and provide a preliminary assessment of in vivo antitumor activity., Materials and Methods: Intravesical suramin treatment was administered in 9 patients with histologically identified transitional cell carcinoma (Tcis, Ta or T1) in whom at least 1 course of standard intravesical chemotherapy (bacillus Calmette-Guerin, thiotepa or mitomycin C) had failed. Suramin was administered once weekly for 6 weeks. Patients were treated in groups of 3 using a 60 cc volume and intrapatient dose escalation schedule. Suramin doses of 0.3 to 614.4 mg./ml. were administered intravesically. The last group was treated with the same weekly dose for 6 weeks., Results: The 9 patients underwent 54 treatments with suramin. Plasma suramin concentration after treatment was 1.9 to 38.0 microg./ml. and was not related to treatment dose. The dose escalation phase was limited by the solubility of suramin in solution. Complications included self-limited bladder spasms (less than 24 hours) in 4 of 54 treatments (7%) and new or worsening vesicoureteral reflux in 3 ureters (17%). Another patient who was treated after the Foley balloon was inflated in the urethra experienced bladder spasms, skin flushing and fever (39C). Mean bladder capacity before and after treatment was 600 and 540 ml., respectively. At followup 7 patients had stage Ta tumors and 2 had carcinoma in situ., Conclusions: An intravesical suramin dose of 153 mg./ml was defined as a safe treatment parameter with acceptable plasma concentrations and minimal side effects. Phase II studies are needed to assess the antitumor activity of suramin in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Purpose of Review: Peripheral neuropathy is a common neurotoxic effect of medications. When medications are used to treat life-threatening illnesses, balancing the toxic effects of peripheral neuropathy with the therapeutic benefits of the drug can be difficult. This article examines recent research into the cellular mechanisms associated with neuropathy after treatment with medications to treat cancer, and HIV, and to prevent transplant rejection., Recent Findings: Cisplatin and suramin induce a length, dose, and time-dependent axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Cisplatin and suramin both result in apoptosis in dorsal root ganglion neurons that may partially explain the neuropathy that develops with treatment. In contrast, nerve growth factor prevents initiation of the programmed cell death associated with cisplatin neurotoxicity. Suramin causes accumulation of lamellar inclusion bodies in dorsal root ganglion neurons related to dose of administration and severity of the neuropathy. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors affect mitochondrial function and lead to depletion of the nerve's mitochondrial DNA and inhibition of DNA polymerase. These effects on the mitochondrion may be related to the polyneuropathy that develops in these patients. In contrast to the axonal neuropathies, tacrolimus and rarely suramin can result in a demyelinating neuropathy that may mimic Guillain-Barré syndrome or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Many of these neuropathies can be reversed by early recognition of the symptoms or by using sensitive electrophysiological testing. In certain instances, specific therapies may ameliorate the neuropathy. Glutamine may reduce paclitaxel-induced toxicity, while some patients with tacrolimus or suramin-induced demyelinating neuropathy may respond to intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis., Summary: Improved understanding of neurotoxic mechanisms in the peripheral nervous system associated with chemotherapeutic and anti-HIV medications, coupled with early improved diagnosis, promises to help limit neurotoxicity associated with these medications.

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the efficacy and toxicity of suramin in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer was dose dependent., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized with equal probability to receive low-, intermediate-, or high-dose suramin (total doses 3.192, 5.320, and 7.661 g/m(2), respectively). Overall survival, time to progression, and response rate (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and objective) for each treatment arm were compared. Relationships between plasma suramin concentrations and response, toxicity, and survival were also evaluated., Results: Three hundred ninety patients were randomized. For the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose arms, the median survival time was 16, 14, and 13 months, respectively (P =.49). The objective response rate was 9%, 7%, and 15%, respectively (P =.10). PSA response rates were 24%, 28%, and 34%, respectively (P =.082). Landmark analyses of a 50% decline in PSA at 20 weeks showed a significant correlation with survival. There was a dose-response relationship between dose and toxicity. After adjusting for treatment arm, the measured suramin concentration was not associated with clinical response, PSA response, survival, or toxicity., Conclusion: Although high-dose suramin was associated with higher objective and PSA response rates, these were not statistically significant. Overall, no dose-response relationship was observed for survival or progression-free survival, but toxicity was increased with the higher dose. Patients treated with the low-dose level experienced modest toxicity, making it the preferred arm on this study. The lack of a dose-response relationship and the toxicity profile observed raise questions regarding the utility of suramin, particularly high-dose suramin, as administered on this schedule.

Purpose: The optimal schedule of administration of suramin has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicities of suramin when administered using a fixed dosing scheme on a once- or twice-monthly schedule., Methods: A total of 40 patients were treated on this phase I dose-escalation study employing a once-monthly (day 1 of each 28-day cycle) and a twice-monthly (days 1 and 8 of each 28-day cycle) schedule., Results: The most common dose-limiting events included fatigue, neuropathy, and anorexia. We identified the 1440 mg/m(2) dose level to be the maximal tolerated dose for both schedules, with 83% of patients developing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) on the twice-monthly schedule, and 67% developing DLT on the monthly schedule. At the 1200 mg/m(2) dose level, only 25% developed DLT on the twice-monthly schedule and 33% developed DLT on the monthly schedule. Trough suramin levels gradually increased with higher dose levels but fell well below the putative toxic concentration of 350 microg/ml., Conclusion: Suramin can be safely administered using a monthly schedule without using plasma concentrations to guide dosing.

Suramin, a polysulphonated napthylurea, has been extensively evaluated over the past 10 years as an anticancer agent, with the most interest in the treatment of prostate cancer. Early clinical results were promising with response rates of up to 70% being reported. However, a recent double-blind study showed only modest palliative effect in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer. In retrospect, it appears those initial reports failed to control for confounding variables such as antiandrogen withdrawal and hydrocortisone. Suramin causes numerous reversible toxicities (lethargy, rash, fatigue, anemia, hyperglycemia, hypocalcemia, coagulopathies, neutropenia, renal and hepatic complications). Neurotoxicity has been the most significant complication and appears to be related to the intensity of the dosing regimen. An optimal therapeutic dose has not been determined, but it is clear that adaptive controls add little benefit. Aside from moderate toxicities and the low therapeutic index in patients with prostate cancer, suramin's development has taught us some valuable lessons (i.e., anti-androgen withdrawal was noted during suramin's development, the use of PSA as an indicator of tumor burden was initiated during the evaluation of suramin). These lessons can be applied to all clinical trials in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Suramin has significantly enhanced the evolution of our knowledge in several areas of prostate cancer biology and treatment.

Peripheral neurotoxicity is a crucial side effect of chemotherapeutic agents. It is the only situation where there is no preventive treatment. Neuromuscular toxicity has become the major dose limiting side effect for many chemotherapeutic agents. The iatrogenic toxic neuropathy is a growing neurologic problem, as cancer patients are beign treated with increasing doses of chemotherapy drugs. Major advances in cancer treatment have resulted from the use of drug combinations; for some combinations this raises the possibility of sinergistic neurotoxicity. The following report reviews the SNP toxicities encountered with cisplatin, vincristine, taxanes and others, and methods to minimize the deleterious effect of chemotherapeutic agents.

Suramin is a polysulfonated naphthylurea with multiple potential mechanisms of action against tumors, including the ability to bind growth factors known to promote tumor angiogenesis. Using an established fixed dosing scheme for the administration of suramin in patients, a pilot study was conducted in patients with progressive, metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective of this trial is to define the effect of suramin on the angiogenic activity in individual patients using in vitro laboratory assays. The secondary objective was to assess the antitumor effect of suramin in a population of metastatic breast cancer patients. No objective tumor responses were observed in any of the 9 patients who received treatment with suramin, however 1 patient did maintain stable disease status. The strength of angiogenic activity present in patient samples was assessed by testing patient plasma in the capillary endothelial cell migration assay. Angiogenic activity followed over time was lowest in patients with the highest suramin concentrations and highest in patients with the lowest suramin concentrations. We conclude that it is feasible to continually monitor the activity of antiangiogenic agents in individual patients without relying on clinical tumor response., (Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of administering a combination of suramin and hydrocortisone in addition to androgen deprivation in a cooperative group setting; to assess the feasibility of treatment with multiple courses of suramin; and to assess progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who underwent such treatment., Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who had adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic, and coagulation parameters were treated by combined androgen deprivation and suramin plus hydrocortisone. Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles. The statistical design was developed on the basis of the feasibility of administering suramin, as judged by the number of patients who developed neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher or by treatment interruption of 4 weeks or longer due to any persistent suramin-related toxicity., Results: Of the 62 patients enrolled onto the study between August 1994 and January 1997, 59 were eligible and assessable for toxicity on the first cycle. Thirty-two (54%) of 59 patients received a second cycle, 13 (22%) of 59 patients received a third cycle, and only five patients (8%) received a fourth cycle. During the first cycle, 27 patients were removed from the study: 17 because of toxicity, five because of disease progression, two who had died, and three because of other reasons. There was one therapy-related death. Grade 4 toxicities were noted in 11 and three patients during first and second courses, respectively. Neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher was observed in nine and seven patients during the first and second cycles, respectively. Fifteen patients had treatment interruptions of 4 weeks or longer. Overall, only 54% (95% confidence interval, 41% to 67%) of the patients demonstrated acceptable limits of toxicity., Conclusion: Suramin plus hydrocortisone and androgen deprivation has limited applicability in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Background: Suramin and epirubicin are both active agents in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory advanced prostate carcinoma, with demonstrated antitumor synergism in vitro on human prostate carcinoma cells and different dose-limiting toxicities. The authors conducted this Phase II study to determine the feasibility, toxicity, and antitumor activity of suramin in combination with epirubicin., Methods: Only patients with hormone-independent advanced prostate carcinoma who had progressive disease after the last therapeutic maneuver they had undergone, including antiandrogen withdrawal, entered the study. Suramin was administered initially as a 6-day continuous infusion for 10 consecutive weeks and then for 6 days every 28 days for a maximum of 6 months. Doses were determined by a computer-assisted dosing system that used Bayesian pharmacokinetics to maintain suramin plasma concentrations of 200-250 microg/mL. Cortisone acetate 25 mg, administered at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. daily, was begun 4 weeks after the initiation of suramin therapy. Epirubicin 25 mg/m2 was given as a weekly intravenous bolus beginning on Day 1 and was continued for a maximum of 6 months., Results: Twenty-six patients entered the study. Toxicities mainly included World Health Organization Grade 1-2 nausea, fatigue, anorexia, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, creatinine elevation, proteinuria, and prolonged prothrombin time, whereas Grade 3 toxicities were uncommon. Among 11 patients with measurable disease, 3 (27%) demonstrated an objective response. Among 24 patients evaluated for prostate specific antigen (PSA) response, 8 (33%; 95% confidence interval 16-55%) had a > or =50% decrease in PSA levels, which lasted a median of 32 (range, 8-52) weeks. Median progression free and overall survival were both 8 months., Conclusions: The combination of suramin and epirubicin used in the current study is feasible, is associated with moderate toxicities, and has antitumor activity in advanced hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. However, the results obtained with this combination do not represent major improvements in the treatment of patients with this disease, compared with suramin or epirubicin alone or other available treatments.

This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and toxicity of suramin administered using a fixed dose schedule in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Fourteen eligible patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were enrolled and treated on a fixed dose schedule of suramin administered over 12 weeks. Suramin was administered by intravenous infusions over 1 hour. None of the 13 evaluable patients demonstrated an objective response. Only 3 patients completed the 12-week therapy course, with the majority developing progressive disease on therapy. The fixed dosage schedule was well tolerated with minimal to moderate toxicity. Suramin in this fixed dose schedule is well tolerated but has no activity in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Suramin was administered to 49 patients in a Phase I cancer trial with real-time pharmacokinetic monitoring and dose individualization to achieve targeted mean plasma concentrations of 210 and 155 mg/liter during the 7-day period between days 15 and 22. Pharmacokinetic sampling after doses on days 1, 3, 5, and 8 was used to modify weekly suramin doses, beginning on day 15, in an attempt to achieve specific averaged plasma concentrations of 210 and 155 mg/liter. A 200-mg test dose was not effective in prospectively determining individual pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage requirements. Patients with peak plasma suramin concentrations in excess of 350 mg/liter may be more likely to experience neurotoxicity (P = 0.06), but there was no statistically significant effect of peak suramin concentration or of cumulative dose. Biopsy and autopsy tissue samples demonstrated low penetration of suramin into brain tissue and muscle but good penetration into prostate and other visceral organs. Prospective use of surrogate substrates for CYP1A2, CYP3A3/4, and CYP2D6 showed no consistent effect of suramin on these enzymes. Although a correlation between creatinine clearance and suramin renal clearance was found (r2 = 0.38; P < 0.00005), there was no correlation between creatinine clearance and total suramin clearance (P = 0.21). No suramin dose modification for renal or hepatic dysfunction can be supported at this time. Three of four ovarian cancer patients demonstrated a drop in CA-125 serum concentrations during suramin treatment.

In this study, we determined the maximum tolerated plasma concentration of suramin (within the predetermined study target range) when combined with doxorubicin in the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Twenty-four patients received suramin dosages based on proportional adjustment of the steady-state plasma suramin concentration to achieve the targeted plasma concentrations of 50-100, 101-150, 151-200, or 201-250 microg/ml. Doxorubicin (20 mg/m2) was administered i.v. over 24 h at weekly intervals. Suramin was given i.v. over 2 h twice weekly. Patients received treatment until dose-limiting toxicity or disease progression. Side effects similar to those reported for suramin and doxorubicin administered as individual agents were observed. Dose-limiting motor neuropathy developed in three patients (13%). Twelve of 24 evaluable patients (50%; 95% confidence interval, 28-71%) and 6 of 10 evaluable patients (60%; 95% confidence interval, 26-88%) had a >50% decrease of prostate-specific antigen and measurable lesions, respectively. The maximum tolerated plasma level of suramin when combined with doxorubicin was 151-200 microg/ml. Future studies on suramin combined with doxorubicin or other agents could be performed using a fixed dosing scheme with a targeted suramin steady-state plasma concentration of 200 microg/ml.

Objective: Ten male patients with onchocerciasis received six weekly infusions of suramin according to the WHO-recommended regimen., Results: In no case did the plasma concentration of suramin exceed 300 mg x l(-1), and serious toxicity was not observed. The apparent volume of distribution (median 20.6 l) was comparable to that reported for patients with prostatic carcinoma. Elimination from patients with onchocerciasis was relatively slow (median plasma clearance 6.2 ml x h(-1), median terminal elimination half-life 91.8 days)., Conclusion: Microfilariae were eliminated in eight out of ten patients. Spontaneous nodule regression was noted in four patients.

Management of prostate cancer progression after failure of initial hormonal therapy is controversial. Recently, the activity of the simple discontinuation of antiandrogen therapy has been established by several groups, as well as the enhanced activity when combined with adrenal suppression (i.e., aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone). Furthermore, suramin has generated considerable interest following reports of response rates ranging from 17 to 70%. More recently, suramin response rates of 18 and 22% have been reported when the potential confounding variables of flutamide withdrawal and hydrocortisone were prospectively controlled. On the basis of the activity of combining aminoglutethimide with flutamide withdrawal, we designed a protocol in which suramin was combined with aminoglutethimide in two cohorts of patients (those with simultaneous antiandrogen withdrawal compared to those who had previously discontinued antiandrogen therapy). Eighty-one evaluable patients were enrolled in this study between June 1992 and November 1994. Patients were a priori divided into two cohorts, those receiving prior antiandrogen withdrawal (n = 56) and those receiving simultaneous antiandrogen withdrawal (n = 25) at the time the patients were enrolled into the trial. For the group that discontinued antiandrogen prior to enrolling in therapy, the partial response rate (> 50% decline in PSA for > 4 weeks) was 14.2%, whereas the partial response was 44% for those patients who discontinued their antiandrogen at the time of starting suramin and aminoglutethimide. The median time to progression was 3.9 months in patients failing prior antiandrogen withdrawal and 5.5 months in those patients having concomitant antiandrogen withdrawal (P = 0.36 for the overall difference). The progression-free survival estimate at 1 year for patients having prior antiandrogen withdrawal was 19.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11-32.9%]. For those patients who experienced antiandrogen withdrawal simultaneous with the treatment, the progression-free survival estimates at 1 and 2 years were 27.1 (95% CI, 13.2-47.6%) and 4.5% (95% CI, 0.8-21.6%). The median survival time for those patients having prior antiandrogen withdrawal was 14.2 months, whereas the median survival was 21.9 months for those having concomitant antiandrogen withdrawal (P = 0.029 for the overall difference). In conclusion, the partial response rate of 44% for those who had concomitant flutamide withdrawal with adrenal suppression was consistent with that of other reports using a similar maneuver. Although this study was not randomized and thus we should not over-interpret the results, flutamide withdrawal plus adrenal suppression appears to have greater activity than flutamide withdrawal alone. Furthermore, these data suggest that suramin adds little to the response rate observed for other adrenal suppressive agents in the presence of antiandrogen withdrawal. This interpretation is in agreement with those studies controlling for adrenal suppression and flutamide withdrawal prior to suramin administration, which noted modest activity of short duration. Given that antiandrogen withdrawal is now accepted as an active maneuver for a subset of patients progressing after maximum androgen blockade, we propose that future trials attempting to maximize response rates incorporate this maneuver whenever possible into prospectively designed regimens.

Background: We have previously shown that basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) enhances corneal epithelial healing in different experimental models in vivo. In order to study the healing effect of this growth factor in pathological conditions of the cornea, we investigated whether topical application of FGF-2 could affect herpes keratitis in rabbits. Since HSV-1 infection is prevented in vitro by incubation with heparin, we also topically applied heparin and suramin, considering the similar interaction of herpes simplex virus and FGF-2 with cell membrane-anchored heparan sulfate., Methods: After virus inoculation with a human BEY.2 strain, rabbits were treated with either FGF-2 (200 ng to 2 micrograms/application), heparin (250 micrograms/application) or suramin (250 micrograms/application) 4 times daily until day 14. Acyclovir and placebo administrations served as controls (n = 48 rabbits). Computerized ulcer surface analysis, clinical observations and virus recovery assays were performed., Results: Topical FGF-2, heparin and suramin treatment revealed a significant reduction in peak ulcer sizes, and complete epithelial healing was achieved earlier than in placebo-treated corneas. However, no significant antiviral effect of FGF-2, heparin and suramin was detectable in plaque assays from conjunctival swabs., Conclusions: These experiments demonstrate that FGF-2 is effective in promoting herpetic epithelial ulcer healing, either due to its proliferative effects on epithelial cells or indirectly by occupying the sites on cell surface heparan sulfate necessary for the attachment of the virion. The latter mechanism of action is presumably the reason for the similar effect of heparin and suramin.

Suramin represents a new class of antitumor drugs that targets growth factor networks. In this Phase II trial, suramin was administered by continuous infusion to 10 patients with advanced breast cancer. The target level of 280 microgram/ml suramin was achieved in a median of 10 days; toxicities in this patient group were low. We monitored the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) network in these patients because of the previously defined growth-promoting role of the IGFs in breast cancer. Plasma levels of total IGF-I and total IGF-II showed variable responses to suramin with median decreases of 24 and 23%, respectively, for the 10 patients; for total IGF-I levels, this did not reach statistical significance. On the other hand, free IGF-I plasma levels were consistently and dramatically increased (over 250%) after suramin infusion. IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), modulators of IGF bioavailability, were also measured. Levels of IGFBP-3, the major carrier of IGFs in the circulation, were decreased 21% after suramin treatment when measured by immunoradiometric assay. However, the majority of the plasma IGFBP-3 remaining after suramin was not the intact high-affinity IGF-binding form but rather a 30-kDa fragment with markedly reduced affinity for IGF-I. IGFBP-3 protease activity was evident in the plasma of 3 of 10 patients after suramin. Measurements of plasma IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4 revealed no significant changes in response to suramin. The dramatic increase in active free IGF-I seen after suramin raises concern and underscores the importance of measuring relevant biomarkers in clinical trials.

Suramin has demonstrated modest activity against prostate cancer and is being investigated in clinical trials. We describe a patient with metastatic prostate cancer who developed nonoliguric renal failure during treatment with suramin. Other potential causes of renal failure were not present in our patient and his renal function gradually recovered with the cessation of suramin treatment. Acute renal failure should be recognized as a potential complication of suramin treatment.

Suramin, a promising chemotherapeutic agent, causes a dose-limiting sensorimotor polyneuropathy. We undertook a phase 1 study of suramin that included serial neurologic and electrophysiologic examinations as part of the safety evaluation. We found that 6 of 41 (15%) patients developed suramin-induced demyelinating neuropathy which resembled Guillain-Barre syndrome clinically. There was 1 asymptomatic patient with electrophysiologic abnormalities suggestive of a demyelinating neuropathy. In addition, 1 patient with mild axonal neuropathy at baseline had deterioration of his symptoms during suramin treatment. Four asymptomatic patients developed electrophysiologic findings suggestive of a mild axonal neuropathy. We conclude that: (1) serial electrophysiologic monitoring is helpful for early detection of suramin-induced neuropathy; and (2) fixed dosing schedule of suramin without adaptive control does not lead to an increased incidence of demyelinating neuropathy when compared to adaptively controlled dosing schedules.

Suramin inhibits the growth of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer in vitro by blocking the action of most known growth factors. The clinical efficacy of suramin was evaluated in patients with unresectable or relapsed NSCLC (n = 16) and advanced breast cancer (ABC) resistant to conventional therapies (n = 12). A plasma level > or = 200 micrograms/ml was maintained by three times weekly administrations using adaptive control with feedback. Treatment was continued until documented progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. No clinical responses were observed in any patient. Median overall survival was 4.5 months in NSCLC and 9 months in ABC patients. Mean treatment duration was 6.6 weeks in NSCLC patients and 15.9 weeks in ABC patients. Treatment was discontinued due to disease progression in 14 patients, unacceptable adverse effects in 11 patients, while three patients refused to continue therapy. We cannot recommend this drug for further clinical trials in NSCLC and ABC.

Background: During a Phase I trial of suramin, a novel antineoplastic agent with activity against hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma, the authors observed two patients with clinical mineralocorticoid insufficiency in spite of hydrocortisone replacement therapy., Methods: The authors retrospectively assessed adrenal cortical function in 20 such patients via adrenocorticotropic stimulation testing, measuring both cortisol and aldosterone responses, either at the time or treatment of immediately after discontinuation of treatment., Results: Two of 9 patients (22%) treated at relatively low dose levels (< or = 1200 mg/m2 on Day 1) demonstrated adrenal cortical insufficiency, as compared with 9 of 11 patients (32%) treated with relatively high doses (> 1200 mg/m2 on Day 1) (P = 0.03 by 1-tailed Fisher's exact test). There appeared to be a cumulative dose-response relationship to the development of glucocorticoid insufficiency, with no instances being observed at doses < 4.8 g/m2 and uniform toxicity occurring at doses > 7.6 g/m2. Long term glucocorticoid insufficiency was present in 1 of 5 patients (20%) tested at an interval of > 90 days after discontinuation of suramin treatment. All instances of glucocorticoid insufficiency were associated with mineralocorticoid insufficiency. Suramin did not affect the absorption or excretion of exogenously administered glucocorticoid in one patient., Conclusions: Suramin causes both primary mineralocorticoid and primary glucocorticoid insufficiency. This may occur in a dose-dependent manner. Long term glucocorticoid insufficiency appears to occur in a minority of patients treated with low doses of suramin. Patients receiving high doses of suramin for treatment of advanced carcinoma should receive at least physiologic replacement doses of both mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid. Higher doses of glucocorticoid may be required in selected patients.

Suramin is an investigational drug that has shown therapeutic activity in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer in Phase I/II trials. Dose-limiting neurotoxicity remains the most serious complication of suramin treatment. We performed a prospective study to define the incidence, severity, characteristics, and dose relationships of suramin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Twenty-two patients who received suramin in a Phase-I trial underwent baseline and serial follow-up neurological evaluations consisting of history, examination, nerve conduction studies and quantitative sensory testing (QST). Suramin was administered intravenously in escalating dosages by using a 5-day schedule (repeated monthly), with the dose, determined by a population pharmacokinetic model, to accomplish 30-min post-infusion concentrations of 300 micrograms ml-1 (cohort I), 350 micrograms m-1 (cohort II) and 400 micrograms ml-1 (cohort III). Twelve patients developed a mild, axonal, length-dependent, sensory-motor poly-neuropathy. Three other patients developed a subacutely progressive, functionally disabling, demyelinating neuropathy; sural nerve biopsy in two patients showed lymphocytic inflammation. These three patients improved after drug discontinuation and plasmapheresis. Although there was no apparent correlation between the cumulative dose and the severity of the neuropathy, no patient from cohort I, but 88% of patients from cohorts II and III, developed neuropathy. We conclude that when suramin is used at peak concentrations of > or = 350 micrograms ml-1 its administration is associated with two patterns of neuropathy, a distal axonal neuropathy and an inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy that is partially reversible. Neurological monitoring for development of neuropathy will improve the safety of suramin use in future clinical studies.

This paper presents a retrospective review of 6 cases of severe neutropenia attributed to suramin, the response to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the possible mechanism. Plasma suramin concentrations, G-CSF, platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB) and fibroblast growth factor basic (FGF basic) levels were measured and correlated with neutropenic course. The time course of neutropenia was unpredictable and occurred both during and following discontinuation of suramin. Neutropenia rapidly resolved with G-CSF. Neither the measured growth factor levels nor plasma suramin concentrations correlated with neutropenia. We conclude that neutropenia secondary to suramin is unpredictable and responds to G-CSF administration permitting further suramin therapy. The mechanism remains unknown.

Purpose: To confirm the previously reported high response rates and prolonged survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with suramin., Patients and Methods: Thirty-six eligible patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer with either measurable disease or bone disease only and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 50 ng/mL were enrolled. Treatment consisted of two 8-week courses of outpatient-based therapy with an interposed rest period. A bayesian adaptive control strategy and a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model that accommodates clearance changes was used to guide individual dosing. A rapid infusion of 1,000 mg/m2 suramin was followed by five daily infusions that targeted 285 micrograms/mL peak plasma levels during the first week. All patients received concomitant hydrocortisone. For the next 7 weeks, patients received one to two doses per week that targeted levels in the 150 to 285 micrograms/mL range and integrated weekly averages of 200 ug/mL., Results: Nine patients (28%) had a partial response to suramin based on a > or = 50% decrease in PSA levels coupled with either relief of bone pain or by a 50% decrease in measurable disease. The median overall survival time for all patients is 31 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 23 to 51). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with fatigue being the most common significant toxicity, but fatal idiosyncratic myelosuppression (grade V) was observed in one patient., Conclusion: Using this dosing schedule, suramin has limited activity against hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. Recent data suggest that hydrocortisone administered with suramin may be partly responsible for the benefit attributed to the drug. Although a small cohort of patients appeared to benefit, we were unable to confirm the previously reported high rate of activity and durability of remission using this agent.

Purpose: Therapy with suramin sodium has been associated with photophobia, iritis, optic atrophy, and vortex keratopathy. We studied the ocular findings in patients who underwent treatment with suramin sodium for metastatic cancer of the prostate., Methods: In a prospective study, 114 patients who underwent treatment with suramin sodium for cancer of the prostate had an ophthalmologic examination with two weeks of onset of treatment and two weeks after termination of therapy. Additional examinations were performed on patients who developed ocular symptoms during suramin sodium therapy., Results: Nineteen (16.6%) of 114 patients developed ocular symptoms and signs while taking suramin sodium. Thirteen of these patients developed bilateral corneal epithelial whorllike deposits. In ten patients, the corneal deposits were associated with foreign body sensation and lacrimation. Symptoms in all of these patients resolved with topical lubricants. Three patients developed asymptomatic corneal deposits. Seven patients had blurred vision and were found to have a mean hyperopic shift in refractive error of 1.13 +/- 0.45 diopters (range, 0.75 to 2.00 diopters) that persisted throughout their treatment course. None of these patients had a decrease in best-corrected visual acuity., Conclusions: In this study, ocular symptoms and signs associated with suramin sodium were common but were not considered a dose-limiting toxicity. Hyperopic shift in refractive error is a previously unreported ocular finding in association with suramin sodium therapy.

Although suramin has long been used to treat human trypanosomiasis, recent clinical trials have tested its efficacy against the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and various malignancies. Thromobocytopenia was observed in early trials with suramin in AIDS, but has been uncommon in patients treated for solid tumors. Here we describe 5 patients out of a total of 67 (7%) who developed severe thrombocytopenia while receiving suramin as part of a phase II clinical trial for metastatic prostate carcinoma refractory to hormonal therapy. IgG purified from one patient's plasma caused suramin-dependent platelet aggregation. There was also evidence of crossreactivity between suramin and heparin in this system. An immune mechanism, however, could not be documented in the other cases, suggesting that multiple mechanisms may be responsible for severe thrombocytopenia in this patient population.

Introduction: Suramin is a synthetic polysulfonated naphthylurea which has been used for the treatment of African trypanosomiasis and onchocerciasis, but since the mid-1980s has received attention as a possible antiretroviral and antineoplastic agent., Objective: This clinical trial of suramin was undertaken as a phase I/II study in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, with the hypothesis that the intensity of therapy with suramin could be increased significantly if measures were undertaken to maintain the plasma concentrations of the drug under 300 microg/ml., Methods: We report the clinical results of this trial, wherein patients were treated at three different targeted plasma suramin concentrations (275, 215 and 175 microg/ml) for varying periods of time (2, 4 or 8 weeks), with delivery of the drug by continuous intravenous infusion., Results: The major toxicity observed in this trial was neurologic, consisting of a motor and sensory peripheral neuropathy that resulted in both paresis and paralysis of the limbs. Nearly all of this severe (CTEP grade III, IV) neurologic toxicity was observed in the patients treated at a plasma suramin concentration of 275 microg/ml for 4 or more weeks. A single patient treated at 215 microg/ml for 8 weeks developed moderate (CTEP grade III) proximal lower extremity weakness, and no patient treated at 175 microg/ml developed this toxicity. The second most common toxicity observed was infection of the central venous catheter. The overall response rate for all of the evaluable patients was 17% (13 of 75 patients). In addition, prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-defined responses were observed in six patients receiving therapy at 175 microg/ml, but these responses were confounded by cessation of therapy with flutamide during suramin treatment., Conclusions: In summary, although plasma suramin concentrations were maintained below 300 microg/ml, neurologic toxicity nonetheless occurred with high frequency in patients treated at 275 microg/ml for 4 or more weeks. Therapy at 215 and 175 microg/ml was in general well tolerated, but central venous catheter-related infection, as well as the inconvenience and expense of continuous infusional therapy, make this method of drug delivery impractical. Only moderate antitumor activity was observed during this trial, but it is possible that both continuation of flutamide and flutamide withdrawal during suramin therapy confounded the assessment of suramin's activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Background and Design: During a trial of suramin for advanced solid tumors, a high rate of cutaneous adverse reactions was observed. We present a prospective study, describing the clinical, histopathologic, histochemical, and immunochemical findings of the cutaneous reactions observed in 60 patients treated with suramin., Results: Forty-nine (82%) of the 60 patients studied experienced at least one cutaneous reaction attributable to suramin therapy. Although morbilliform reactions predominated, a wide variety of eruptions was observed. Most reactions occurred within the first 24 hours of therapy and were self-limited despite continued drug infusion. Distinctive cutaneous findings included scaling erythematous papules (suramin keratoses) and a predilection of many eruptions for previously sun-exposed areas. Six patients experienced severe cutaneous reactions, but no patient permanently withdrew from therapy because of cutaneous toxic reactions. Common histopathologic findings included hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, spongiosis, acanthosis, exocytosis, apoptosis, a perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, upper dermal edema, and increased dermal mucin. Staining with S100 antigen was markedly positive in several specimens. Only trace amounts of suramin were detected in skin samples tested with high-pressure liquid chromatography., Conclusions: The incidence of cutaneous toxic reactions from suramin greatly exceeds that seen with other medications. A wide spectrum of skin manifestations were observed, including suramin keratoses and UV recall, although serious reactions were infrequent. Cutaneous toxic reactions neither predicted nor correlated with other toxic reactions from suramin. Suramin may soon become more widely used; practitioners should be aware of the high incidence and wide spectrum of cutaneous toxic reactions to this drug.

Purpose: To describe pharmacologic variables correlated with the development of neurologic toxicity in patients treated with suramin., Methods: Eighty-one patients were treated with suramin in a phase I study. The rate of drug infusion was continuously adjusted to maintain a preassigned plasma suramin concentration (175, 215, or 275 micrograms/mL) for a fixed duration (2 to 8 weeks)., Results: Eight patients developed grade III/IV neurologic motor impairment (predominantly motor axonal polyneuropathy). All were treated at the 275-micrograms/mL concentration. One patient treated at the 215-micrograms/mL concentration developed grade II motor dysfunction. In addition, seven of nine patients had sensory symptoms. Pharmacologic variables associated with the development of polyneuropathy included total cumulative suramin dose, duration of exposure to plasma concentrations greater than 200 micrograms/mL, and area under the curve (AUC) greater than 200 micrograms/mL., Conclusion: Significant neurologic toxicity can result from therapy with suramin, even when dosing is designed to avoid exposure to plasma concentrations greater than 350 micrograms/mL. Future clinical trials of suramin should be designed in such a way as to limit the total cumulative dose to < or = 157 mg/kg given over a period of > or = 8 weeks, limit the period of exposure to plasma suramin concentrations greater than 200 micrograms/mL to < or = 25 days, and limit the AUC greater than 200 micrograms/mL to < or = 48,000 mg.h/AL.