Search

Autor je pri pisanju diplomskog rada koristio stručnu literaturu koja govori o situaciji na otoku Visu od kapitulacije Italije do kraja Drugog svjetskog rata. Također, koristeći se arhivskom građom i tadašnjom periodikom, pokušao je dodatno prikazati život lokalnog stanovništva pod talijanskom okupacijom i nakon nje. Najprije je prikazana situacija na otoku Visu prije kapitulacije Italije te se osvrnuo na njegovo strategijsko i političko značenje koje će biti od iznimne važnosti za sam tijek Rata na prostoru Jugoslavije. Naime, otok Vis je bio etapna stanica za zbjeg stanovništva u Italiju te se od tamo dio izbjeglica prebacio Savezničkim brodovima u Egipat. Osim toga, otok je bio tada važna točka na Jadranu za transport Savezničkog oružja i opreme koja je bila prijeko potrebna NOVJ u borbi protiv Nijemaca i njihovih saveznika. Otok Vis dobiva dodatno na važnosti 7. lipnja 1944. godine. Naime, od tada do 18. rujna 1944. godine na otoku su boravili članovi Vrhovnog štaba, Predsjedništvo AVNOJ-a zajedno s Josipom Brozom Titom. U tom vremenskom intervalu oni su iz otoka Visa rukovodili vojnim operacijama NOVJ-a na otoku i kopnu te su se diplomatski borili za svoju ideju buduće Jugoslavije nakon Rata. Također, Vrhovni štab se iz Visa nije se bavio samo s Narodno Oslobodilačkim Pokretima unutar teritorija predratne Jugoslavije, nego je surađivao i s grčkim, albanskim i bugarskim Narodno Oslobodilačkim Pokretima koji su djelovali protiv nacista i njihovih saveznika. Tako se može reći da je tada otok Vis imao međunarodno značenje u borbi protiv nacizma. In writing his thesis, the author used professional literature that talks about the situation on the island of Vis from the capitulation of Italy to the end of World War II. Also, using archival material and periodicals of the time, he tried to show further the life of the local population under and after the Italian occupation. First, the situation on the island of Vis before the capitulation of Italy was presented, and he commented on its strategic and political significance, which will be extremely important for the course of the War in Yugoslavia. Namely, the island of Vis was a stage station for the refugee population to Italy, and from there part of the refugees were transferred by Allied ships to Egypt. In addition, the island was then an important point on the Adriatic for the transport of Allied weapons and equipment that was much needed by the NOVJ in the fight against the Germans and their allies. The island of Vis gained additional importance on June 7, 1944. Namely, from then until September 18, 1944, members of the Supreme Staff, the Presidency of AVNOJ, together with Josip Broz Tito, stayed on the island. In that time interval, they led the NOVJ's military operations on the island and the mainland from the island of Vis and fought diplomatically for their idea of a future Yugoslavia after the War. Also, the Supreme Headquarters from Vis not only dealt with the People's Liberation Movements within the territory of pre-war Yugoslavia, but also cooperated with the Greek, Albanian and Bulgarian People's Liberation Movements that acted against the Nazis and their allies. Thus, it can be said that at that time the island of Vis had international significance in the fight against Nazism.

Статья посвящена одному из самых важных факторов, определивших специфику формирования «героического» и образов военных героев на страницах российской печати в годы Первой мировой войны. Этот фактор – военная цензура и цензурная политика. На основе ранее неизвестных документов и материалов российской периодической печати в статье раскрывается деятельность бюрократического механизма военной цензуры. Составными элементами этого механизма были органы армейской и прифронтовой цензуры, центральные цензурные учреждения, а также многочисленные военные цензоры, в большинстве своем офицеры. Руководствуясь, с одной стороны, установленными правилами, а с другой – собственными представлениями об охране военных тайн в печати, военные цензоры решали, появятся или нет на страницах газет и журналов те или иные известия с фронта. Именно они на протяжении 1914–1916 гг. определяли судьбу тем и сюжетов, которые содержали описание «героического» и которые могли стать известными читателям по всей России. В статье показано, что военная цензура стремилась не допустить до обнародования многие конкретные обстоятельства совершения подвигов солдатами и офицерами. Такая цензурная политика закономерно приводила к обезличиванию и формализации «героического» в газетных и журнальных сообщениях о ходе военных действий. Газеты и журналы могли представить читателям фигуру героя и описание его подвига лишь в самом общем виде. Цензурные преграды не позволяли им создать яркие и убедительные образы героев, которые стали бы объектом всеобщего восхищения, олицетворением духовных ценностей страны и примером для подражания. В результате газетные и журнальные описания подвигов фронтовиков не производили на читателей того мотивирующего воздействия, которое было необходимо для поддержания боевого духа и патриотического настроения на фронте и в тылу., The article highlights military censorship as one of the most important factors which was responsible for specific images of war heroes and heroism depicted in the Russian press during World War I. Based on previously unknown documents and materials from the periodical press, the article reveals the bureaucratic mechanism of military censorship which involved such components as the army and front-line censorship, central censorship bodies, as well as numerous other censors, mostly, officers. Guided by the established rules, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, by what they believed how military classified information needed to be guarded, military censors would decide whether front news was or was not to appear on the pages of the press. From 1914 to 1916 they determined on the destiny of plots and topics featuring “the heroic” that could have reached the reader throughout Russia. The authors show that the military censorship succeeded in concealing numerous circumstances of heroic deeds and actions performed by soldiers and officers. Such censorship policy resulted in the depersonalization and formalization as the newspapers and magazines reported about “the heroics” displayed in the course of military operations. Hence, due to the censorship, the heroes and their feats were often presented by the press in a far too general form, with their character lacking vividness and credibility. This prevented those heroic images from becoming an object of people’s admiration, the embodiment of the country’s moral values and a model to follow. As a result, the military feats as depicted in the press failed to arouse the motivation among the readers which was strong enough to keep up morale and patriotic sentiment at the front and in the rear.

U članku su s aspekta povijesti institucija prikazani rezultati istraživanja ustroja i nadležnosti tehničko-prometnih organa 6. korpusa narodnooslobodilačke vojske, kao i njihovo djelovanje vezano uz organizaciju željezničkog prometa. Detaljnije je razrađen rad Tehničkog odsjeka 6. korpusa, koji je do početka kolovoza 1944. bio nadležan za željeznice na svome području djelovanja. Željezničke pruge na području djelovanja 6. korpusa bile su prve pruge na prostoru Hrvatske koje su koristile jedinice narodnooslobodilačke vojske. Tako je već 22. listopada 1943. Tehnički odsjek 6. korpusa izdao Naredbu o željezničkom saobraćaju na pruzi Zvečevo – Cikočka Rijeka. U kolovozu 1944. proveden je preustroj Tehničkog odsjeka 6. korpusa. Saobraćajna sekcija izdvojena je iz Tehničkog odsjeka i otada je djelovala kao samostalni Saobraćajni odsjek koji je preuzeo nadležnost za željeznice na svome području djelovanja. Rezultati istraživanja temelje se prvenstveno na analizi arhivskog gradiva fondova koji se nalaze u Hrvatskom državnom arhivu. U radu su korišteni i zbornici dokumenata i podataka o narodnooslobodilačkom ratu, te predmetna literatura., From the aspect of history of institutions this article shows research results of the structure and jurisdiction of the technical-traffic bodies of the 6th Corps of the National Liberation Army, together with their activities regarding organizing rail traffic. The work of the 6th Corps’ Technical Division is developed in detail, since until the beginning of August 1944 it was in charge of the railways in its area of activity. The railway lines in the area of the 6th Corps activity were the first ones in the area of Croatia used by the units of the National Liberation Army. Already on the October 22, 1943 the Technical Division of the 6th Corps issued the Decree about the Rail Traffic on the Zvečevo – Cikočka Rijeka Railway Line. The Technical Division of the 6th Corps was reorganized in August 1944. The Traffic Section was singled out from the Technical Division and was since then active as an independent Traffic Division that took over the jurisdiction of the railways in its area of activity. The research results are primarily based on the analysis of the archives of fonds kept in the Croatian State Archives. Other used sources include anthologies of documents and information on the Liberation War, as well as subject literature.

U članku se prikazuje ustroj Željeznica narodnooslobodilačke vojske (ŽNOV) kroz vojnu (Vrhovni štab, Glavni štab Hrvatske) i, uvjetno rečeno, civilnu (Povjereništvo za saobraćaj NKOJ-a i Povjereništvo prometa ZAVNOH-a) strukturu. Za poslove željeznica unutar Vrhovnoga štaba bio je mjerodavan Tehnički odsjek, dok je unutar Glavnoga štaba Hrvatske za poslove željeznica bilo zaduženo Saobraćajno odjeljenje. Od 3. studenoga 1944. cjelokupni promet i prometne službe spadale su pod neposrednu upravu Povjereništva saobraćaja NKOJ-a. Vrhovnu upravu nad narodnim željeznicama u Hrvatskoj obavljalo je Povjereništvo prometa ZAVNOH-a., The article presents organization of the Railways of People's Liberation Army (ŽNOV/Željeznice narodnooslobodilačke vojske) analysing military (Supreme Headquarters, General staff for Croatia), and civil (Traffic Commission of NKOJ/National Committee of Yugoslav Liberation/; Traffic Commission of ZAVNOH/Federal Antifascist Council of People's Liberation of Croatia/) bodies responsible for it. Care for the railway issues inside the Supreme Headquarters was a task of the Technical Department, while a Traffic Department was responsible for them inside the General staff for Croatia. Scope of the Traffic Commission of NKOJ regarding railways included construction, maintaining and control of railway traffic, and organization and management of technical training i.e. of professional schools. According to that, Traffic Commission of NKOJ had responsilibities for the traffic in entirety. The first traffic commissioner was a general-lieutenant Sreten Žujović-Crni, being, at the same time, a member of the Supreme Headquarters of the People's Liberation Army and Partisan Units of Yugoslavia. Supreme governement of the people's railway network in Croatia was a responsability of the Traffic Commission of ZAVNOH. A head of that Commission was a traffic commissioner according to whose orders and under whose ruling and supervision all traffic activities in Croatia were going on (people's railway, post, telegraph and telephone, radio, road and river traffic). Executive control and direct administration of the Croatian railway service was a task of the Directorate of People's Railways in Croatia. And finally, a testimony of Vladimir Dedijer on partisan railways and sabotages of railroads, is presented, same as the citation from the speech of the minister responsible for railways in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, regarding conditions of the Yugoslav railways in the People's Liberation War.