Search

Global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS) are reduced with cytotoxic chemotherapy. There are limited data on the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis on GCS and GRS.This study aimed to detail the role of GCS and GRS in ICI myocarditis.In this retrospective study, GCS and GRS from 75 cases of patients with ICI myocarditis and 50 ICI-treated patients without myocarditis (controls) were compared. Pre-ICI GCS and GRS were available for 12 cases and 50 controls. Measurements were performed in a core laboratory blinded to group and time. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, complete heart block, and cardiac death.Cases and controls were similar in age (66 ± 15 years vs 63 ± 12 years; P = 0.20), sex (male: 73% vs 61%; P = 0.20) and cancer type (P = 0.08). Pre-ICI GCS and GRS were also similar (GCS: 22.6% ± 3.4% vs 23.5% ± 3.8%; P = 0.14; GRS: 45.5% ± 6.2% vs 43.6% ± 8.8%; P = 0.24). Overall, 56% (n=42) of patients with myocarditis presented with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). GCS and GRS were lower in myocarditis compared with on-ICI controls (GCS: 17.5% ± 4.2% vs 23.6% ± 3.0%; P< 0.001; GRS: 28.6% ± 6.7% vs 47.0% ± 7.4%; P< 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 30days, 28 cardiovascular events occurred. A GCS (HR: 4.9 [95%CI: 1.6-15.0]; P = 0.005) and GRS (HR: 3.9 [95%CI: 1.4-10.8]; P = 0.008) below the median was associated with an increased event rate. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, GCS (AUC: 0.80 [95%CI: 0.70-0.91]) and GRS (AUC: 0.76 [95%CI: 0.64-0.88]) showed better performance than cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (AUC: 0.70 [95%CI: 0.58-0.82]), LVEF (AUC: 0.69 [95%CI: 0.56-0.81]), and age (AUC: 0.54 [95%CI: 0.40-0.68]). Net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement demonstrated incremental prognostic utility of GRS over LVEF (P = 0.04) and GCS over cTnT (P = 0.002).GCS and GRS are lower in ICI myocarditis, and the magnitude of reduction has prognostic significance.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes among patients with established heart failure. Despite supportive basic science studies, there are no data on the value of SGLT2 inhibitors among patients treated with anthracyclines.This study sought to test the cardiac efficacy and overall safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients treated with anthracyclines.This study identified 3,033 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and cancer who were treated with anthracyclines. Cases were patients with cancer and DM who were on SGLT2 inhibitor therapy during anthracycline treatment (n = 32). Control participants (n = 96) were patients with cancer and DM who were also treated with anthracyclines, but were not on an SGLT2 inhibitor. The primary cardiac outcome was a composite of cardiac events (heart failure incidence, heart failure admissions, new cardiomyopathy [10% decline in ejection fraction to 53%], and clinically significant arrhythmias). The primary safety outcome was overall mortality.Age, sex, ethnicity, cancer type, cancer stage, and other cardiac risk factors were similar between groups. There were 20 cardiac events over a median follow-up period of 1.5 years. The cardiac event incidence was lower among case patients in comparison to control participants (3% vs 20%; P = 0.025). Case patients also experienced lower overall mortality when compared with control participants (9% vs 43%; P 0.001) and a lower composite of sepsis and neutropenic fever (16% vs 40%; P = 0.013).SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with lower rate of cardiac events among patients with cancer and DM who were treated with anthracyclines. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors appeared to be safe. These data support the conducting of a randomized clinical trial testing SGLT2 inhibitors in patients at high cardiac risk treated with anthracyclines.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE), U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF), and Framingham Risk Score (FRS) models in predicting ASCVD events among patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNCA). From a large cohort of HNCA patients treated with RT, ASCVD events were adjudicated. Observed vs. predicted ASCVD events were compared. We compared rates by statin eligibility status. Regression models and survival analysis were used to identify the relationship between predicted risk and post-RT outcomes. Among the 723 identified patients, 274 (38%) were statin-eligible based on USPSTF criteria, 359 (49%) based on PCE, and 234 (32%) based on FRS. During follow-up, 17% developed an ASCVD, with an event rate of 27 per 1000 person-years, 68% higher than predicted (RR 1.68 (95% CI: 1.02, 2.12), p < 0.001). In multivariable regression, there was no difference in event rates by statin eligibility status (p > 0.05). Post-RT, the observed event rate was higher than the predicted ASCVD risk across all grades of predicted risk (p < 0.05) and the observed risk of an ASCVD event was high even among patients predicted to have a low risk of ASCVD. In conclusion, current ASCVD risk calculators significantly underestimate the risk for ASCVD among patients receiving RT for HNCA.