Search

Bladder cancer, often asymptomatic in the early stages, is a type of cancer where early detection is crucial. Herein, endoscopic images are meticulously evaluated by experts, and sometimes even by different disciplines, to identify tissue types. It is believed that the time spent by experts can be utilized for patient treatment with the creation of a computer-aided decision support system. For this purpose, in this study, it is evaluated that the performances of three models proposed using the bladder tissue dataset. The first model is a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning (DL) network, and the second is a model named hybrid cnn-machine learning (ML) or DL + ML, which involves classifying deep features obtained from a CNN-based network with ML. The last one, and the one that achieved the best performance metrics, is a vision transformer (ViT) architecture. Furthermore, a graphical user interface (GUI) is provided for an accessible decision support system. As a result, accuracy and F1 score values for DL, DL + ML, and ViT models are 0.9086-0.8971-0.9257 and 0.8884-0.8496-0.8931, respectively., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.)

The differentiation of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors is of major significance as it directly affects the treatment process. In addition, it is also a vital task in terms of early and accurate diagnosis of parotid gland tumors and the determination of treatment planning accordingly. As in other diseases, the differentiation of tumor types involves several challenging, time-consuming, and laborious processes. In the study, Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of 114 patients with parotid gland tumors are used for training and testing purposes by Image Fusion (IF). After the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), Contrast-enhanced T1-w (T1C-w), and T2-w sequences are cropped, IF (ADC, T1C-w), IF (ADC, T2-w), IF (T1C-w, T2-w), and IF (ADC, T1C-w, T2-w) datasets are obtained for different combinations of these sequences using a two-dimensional Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)-based fusion technique. For each of these four datasets, ResNet18, GoogLeNet, and DenseNet-201 architectures are trained separately, and thus, 12 models are obtained in the study. A Graphical User Interface (GUI) application that contains the most successful of these trained architectures for each data is also designed to support the users. The designed GUI application not only allows the fusing of different sequence images but also predicts whether the label of the fused image is benign or malignant. The results show that the DenseNet-201 models for IF (ADC, T1C-w), IF (ADC, T2-w), and IF (ADC, T1C-w, T2-w) are better than the others, with accuracies of 95.45%, 95.96%, and 92.93%, respectively. It is also noted in the study that the most successful model for IF (T1C-w, T2-w) is ResNet18, and its accuracy is equal to 94.95%., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.)

Rationale and Objectives: Salivary gland tumors constitute 2%-6% of all head and neck tumors and are most common in the parotid gland. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most sensitive imaging modality for diagnosis. Tumor type, localization, and relationship with surrounding structures are important factors for treatment. Therefore, parotid gland tumor segmentation is important. Specialists widely use manual segmentation in diagnosis and treatment. However, considering the development of artificial intelligence-based models today, it is seen that artificial intelligence-based automatic segmentation models can be used instead of manual segmentation, which is a time-consuming technique. Therefore, we segmented parotid gland tumor (PGT) using deep learning-based architectures in the paper., Materials and Methods: The dataset used in the study includes 102 T1-w, 102 contrast-enhanced T1-w (T1C-w), and 102 T2-w MR images. After cropping the raw and manually segmented images by experts, we obtained the masks of these images. After standardizing the image sizes, we split these images into approximately 80% training set and 20% test set. Hereabouts, we trained six models for these images using ResNet18 and Xception-based DeepLab v3+. We prepared a user-friendly Graphical User Interface application that includes each of these models., Results: From the results, the accuracy and weighted Intersection over Union values of the ResNet18-based DeepLab v3+ architecture trained for T1C-w, which is the most successful model in the study, are equal to 0.96153 and 0.92601, respectively. Regarding the results and the literature, it can be seen that the proposed system is competitive in terms of both using MR images and training the models independently for T1-w, T1C-w, and T2-w. Expressing that PGT is usually segmented manually in the literature, we predict that our study can contribute significantly to the literature., Conclusion: In this study, we prepared and presented a software application that can be easily used by users for automatic PGT segmentation. In addition to predicting the reduction of costs and workload through the study, we developed models with meaningful performance metrics according to the literature., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The COVID-19 pandemic has been affecting the world since December 2019, and nowadays, the number of infected is increasing rapidly. Chest X-ray images are clinical adjuncts that can be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. Because of the rapid spread of COVID-19 disease worldwide and the limited number of expert radiologists, the proposed method uses the automatic diagnosis method rather than a manual diagnosis method. In the paper, COVID-19 Positive/Negative (2275 Positive, 4626 Negative) and Normal/Pneumonia (2313 Normal, 2313 Pneumonia) are diagnosed using chest X-ray images. Herein, 80 % and 20 % of the images are used in the training and validation set, respectively. In the proposed method, six different classifiers are trained using chest X-ray images, and the five most successful classifiers are used in both phases. In Phase-1 and Phase-2, image features are extracted using the Bag of Features method for Cosine K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Linear Discriminant, Logistic Regression, Bagged Trees Ensemble, Medium Gaussian Support Vector Machine (SVM), excluding SqueezeNet Deep Learning (K = 2000 and K = 1500 for Phase-1 and Phase-2, respectively). In both phases, the five most successful classifiers are determined, and images classify with the help of the Majority Voting (Mathematical Evaluation) method. The application of the proposed method is designed for users to diagnose COVID-19 Positive, Normal, and Pneumonia. The results show that accuracy values obtained by Majority Voting (Mathematical Evaluation) method for Phase-1 and Phase-2 are equal to 99.86 % and 99.28 %, respectively. Thus, it indicates that the accuracy of the whole system is 99.63 % . When we analyze the classification performance metrics for Phase-1 and Phase-2, Specificity (%), Precision (%), Recall (%), F 1 Score (%), Area Under Curve (AUC), and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) are equal to 99.98-99.83-99.07-99.51-0.9974-0.9855 and 99.73-99.69-98.63-99.23-0.9928-0.9518, respectively. Moreover, if the classification performance metrics of the whole system are examined, it is seen that Specificity (%), Precision (%), Recall (%), F 1 Score (%), AUC, and MCC are 99.88, 99.78, 98.90, 99.40, 0.9956, and 0.9720 , respectively. When the studies in the literature are examined, the results show that the proposed model is better than its counterparts. Because the best performance metrics for the dataset used were obtained in this study. In addition, since the biphasic majority voting technique is used in the study, it is seen that the proposed model is more reliable. On the other hand, although there are tens of thousands of studies on this subject, the usability of these models is debatable since most of them do not have graphical user interface applications. Already, in artificial intelligence technologies, besides the performance of the developed models, their usability is also important. Because the developed models can generally be used by people who are less knowledgeable about artificial intelligence., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)